Odyssey Stroke Lab Triple Track Putter
News

Odyssey Stroke Lab Triple Track Putter

Odyssey Stroke Lab Triple Track Putter

Technology Year Two

On one of the No Putts Given Podcasts, Tony mentioned that it’s typically the second release featuring a new golf technology (Odyssey Triple Track Putter) where significant gains happen. Basically, companies have had a full year of marketplace research to identify the bugs with the technology, ideally then removing said bugs and thus delivering purified product performance for the second iteration. Naturally, this idea holds true for more than just golf equipment, with each new version of a product typically being superior to the preceding ones, with late ’60s muscle cars being the exception, naturally.

Another situation where the second run of a product featuring a new technology may not actually be superior is when the technology didn’t change. Same tech, new year. In some cases, the tech is still working, so why change it?

That is the core of the 2020 story with Odyssey’s Stroke Lab shafted putters. When you compare the 2019 version to the 2020 version of the Stroke Lab putter shaft, you will find they are exactly the same. It is kind of an oddity, actually, in the ever-changing golf equipment landscape – a technology that lives unaltered through multiple release cycles.

Odyssey is committed to the Stroke Lab shaft, with it being the stock shaft on all of their putters, from the lowest- to the highest-priced models. Both of the new 2020 putter lines that I have to share with you, the Stroke Lab Black line and the Triple Track line, come stock with the Stroke Lab shaft. Like in 2019, Odyssey is all Stroke Lab all the time. As such, before we get to the new putters, let’s run a quick Stroke Lab shaft recap.

Deeper (Tour) Penetration

Odyssey Triple Track Putter

While tour usage typically drives about 0% of my golf purchases, people comment all of the time that if a technology truly gave the pros an advantage, then they would all be using it. Take a look at that graph above. During the first half of 2019, pros on all professional tours were switching to Stroke Lab shafted putters.

Not only were more pros using Stroke Lab putters, but they were also dominating the tours with these putters. Here are a couple of 2019 Odyssey putter stats to ponder.

  • Odyssey won the year-long count on every major tour.
  • More Odyssey putters in play than Titleist #2 and PING #3 combined.
  • More wins with Odyssey (65) than any other brand.
  • Odyssey won the count at every major in 2019 (14 of 14 and 6 major wins).

So over the course of last season, lots of Odyssey pros switched to the Stroke Lab shaft and those pros won tournaments. I get why redesigning the Stroke Lab shaft for 2020 was not imperative. The shaft is working and the population of Stroke Lab shaft users is growing. That’s not a recipe for product overhaul.

So it’s working, and gaining popularity, but what is the secret Stroke Lab sauce that is driving its proliferation?

Hits the Hole More

Odyssey Triple Track Putter

At the end of the day, it’s all about balls in cups. That’s what earns pro golfers prize money and gives the amateur a sense of satisfaction as he or she heads to the next tee box. Missing putts sucks. Something that helps us miss less is something that we need, period.

As you can see from the graphic above, the Stroke Lab shaft improves consistency over multiple putting metrics. Consistency may be the most important thing when it comes to putting. Simple logic states that if your stroke can become more consistent, then your putting should be more consistent. Even if you are consistently missing three feet left, that tells you to aim three feet right, correct?

Last month, when I visited Odyssey headquarters, the putter guys dove a little deeper into the Face Angle At Impact data point, providing the following table to show why the value is so important.

The quick interpretation of this table is that with a 4.25″ hole, as soon as you are more than 2.125″ off center, you are going to miss the putt. So green boxes are made putts, yellows are maybes, and red boxes are misses. As the Face Angle at Impact increases, so does the degree of off-center travel. Contrasting this, if you can improve the angle at impact, you should be closer to the center of the cup, and more putts should be falling.

 

The reported improvement of 13% doesn’t seem like much, but think about what making 13% more putts would mean for your index. I’d like to make ~three more putts a round. Naturally, the 13% Face Angle value doesn’t translate directly to 13% more putts made, but it should absolutely translate to more putts made. You can fight me on this, but anything that makes you a more consistent putter should make you a more accurate putter, assuming you can make reads and aim.

No, the Stroke Lab shaft won’t help you read greens better – take an Aimpoint class for that – but Odyssey does have a new aiming trick for you that we will get back to in a bit.

2020 Stroke Lab Black Expansion

We actually got to take a look at the Stroke Lab Black line back in October when Odyssey unveiled the Stroke Lab Black Ten and Bird of Prey models. While most people focused on the Spider-likeness of the Ten, the actual story was all about the new Microhinge Star insert.

The White Hot insert is the standard by which all inserts are judged at Odyssey. That insert’s popularity has been a bit of a curse for Odyssey designers. Players love the sound and feel of the White Hot insert so much that they resist trying any new putter with a different insert. Players want the White Hot sound and feel. The design challenge then becomes making an insert that performs better than White Hot, but still sounds and feels like White Hot.

Without getting too technical, the Microhinge Star insert’s new construction allows it achieve this seemingly impossible White Hot benchmark. The ball speed to club head speed ratio of the new Microhinge Star insert is within a few hundredths of the White Hot ratio, as are the tonal frequency and amplitude values. Simply put, the Microhinge Star insert feels and sounds like the White Hot insert, while delivering improved top spin on the ball.

Microhinge Star looks like it could be the insert that finally kicks White Hot putters out of bags, or at least the one that White Hot loyalists should take a long look at.

Seven Stroke Lab Black Options

In 2020, Odyssey will be adding five more models to the Stroke Lab Black line, with the Ten and Bird of Prey rounding out the set. Some of these models are the expected popular kids, like the One and the Seven, but Odyssey is also bringing back the historically beloved Rossi, as well as a brand-new large mallet design, the R-Line Arrow. Here are some up-close-and-personal shots with these two new models.

Rossi

R-Line Arrow

GET FIT FOR YOUR GAME WITH TRUEGOLFFIT™

Unbiased. No Guesswork. All Major Brands. Matched To Your Swing. Advanced Golf Analytics matches the perfect clubs to your exact swing using connected data and machine learning.

FREE FITTING

The Triple Track Story: 5 Minutes of R&D

Odyssey Triple Track Putter

One of my favorite things is to chat with putter designers about their design process. To me, there is nothing more interesting than hearing how moving metal and changing shape changes the performance and sound characteristics of a putter. Making a new putter is a lengthy process, with putter designs usually going through a bunch of prototype iterations before they settle on the final design.

For the Triple Track putters, the design process is rumored to have taken five minutes.

That five-minute design roundtable took place last year after Callaway introduced the Triple Track alignment scheme on their ERC balls. The design team supposedly grabbed some tape and a couple of Sharpies and created an instant mock-up of a Triple Track putter. Simple as that. Some designs basically design themselves.

I didn’t get what they were doing with these when I first saw the photos. I actually saw photos of these putters before I went down to visit and I have no problem reporting that my enthusiasm for their looks was definitely lacking. To my putter minimalist sensibilities, these putters looked gaudy and were almost immediately relegated to my not-gonna-ever-putt-with-that zone. My feeling of Triple Track blasé continued through the Odyssey putter guys’ presentation, until I saw this image:

Odyssey Triple Track Putter

That picture gobsmacked my smug disregard. How had I missed the brilliant simplicity of the design? Seriously, are you going to address the ball like the putter on the above right or the above left? Only someone looking to miss on purpose would address the ball without the lies all lined up. If you have aimed the lines on the ball correctly, then the putter head is aimed correctly as well.

It was so simple that I just didn’t see it, or maybe it just seemed too simple to be effective. Once again, Odyssey had some data to report.

Odyssey Triple Track Putter

Odyssey used a laser-based system to measure where their test golfers were aiming and the data supported that the Triple Track alignment system on the ball and putter increased the likelihood that golfers were indeed aiming at the target. The 29% number coming from the combination of ball and putter is not incosiderable. If you aim at the right target more, you are probably more likely to make putts.

Odyssey Triple Track Putter

In addition to aiming better, golfers using the Triple Track system were more likely to strike the center of the face of the putter. The Odyssey guys were a bit surprised by this, but definitely pleased. 106% is a crazy improvement. Apply that to any part of your game and see what I mean. You driving distance is now 106% longer. See, that’s a big deal.

So maybe it did come from a five-minute design meeting, but the Triple Track alignment system looks like it could really be an easy-to-use, beneficial technology. Obviously, you’ll also need Triple Track golf balls for maximum effectiveness but Callaway will be happy to sell you those as well.

The other big take-home from the Triple Track testing is that obviously nobody should ever putt with a blank Tuttle…

Triple Track Models

Odyssey Triple Track Putter

The Triple Track lineup is very mallet-centric with the only “blades” being the Double Wide and 2-Ball blade. Odyssey’s design theme of mallets that play like blades is alive and well in the Triple Track line as well, with slant-neck options available on the Ten and the Double Wide.

Like the Stroke Lab Black putters, the Triple Track putters all feature the new Microhinge Star insert and the Stroke Lab shaft.

Here are some more detailed shots of a few of the models.

Triple Track 2-Ball

Triple Track Ten

Triple Track Double Wide

Odyssey Will Be Fun To Watch In 2020

Odyssey Triple Track Putter

I think that 2020 will be a fun year to watch what happens with Odyssey, both with sales and on tour. Will the Microhinge Star insert be the one that finally takes away White Hot’s crown? Will more players move to the Stroke Lab shaft, especially players who are not under contract with Odyssey? Will players, both professional and amateur, embrace the Triple Track tech?

I totally expect to see someone on tour using a Triple Track putter. I’m basing this expectation on watching Joe Toulon, Odyssey’s putter specialist on tour, drop a ninety-foot putt with the Triple Track Ten when we played together during my visit. Not a nine-foot putt. Ninety. Joe is a great player who could obviously play any putter and was dropping bombs with the Triple Track Ten. Since Joe is on the Odyssey tour truck, that’s zero degrees of separation from Odyssey tour pros. You know that some tour pro is going to have a bad week on the greens and look for something new. It would be a great story if a five-minute design could earn a player $100,000 per design minute.

You should be able to find both of these lines in shops near you at the end of the month (01/30/2020) with the retail pricing of $299.99 for Stroke Lab Black, and $249.99 for the Triple Track putters. I can’t wait to hear what you think about both lines.

To find out more about both putter lines, be sure to visit www.odysseygolf.com

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

A putter-obsessed recreational golfer, constantly striving to improve his game while not getting too hung up about it. Golf should be fun, always.

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Toulon Golf Small Batch Meadow Club Putter
Apr 11, 2024 | 3 Comments
Bettinardi CB24 and MB24 Forged Irons
Mar 26, 2024 | 11 Comments
Toulon Golf Texas Small Batch Putter
Mar 14, 2024 | 0 Comments
Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Hazen Purey

      4 years ago

      Not going to slow me down at all. The TT ball has already saved me time lining up putts. No longer have to see a spot in front of my ball and then lose that spot when setting up. Just like any sharpie line in the past but with the TT ball no more smudges on my club faces getting to the green. The putter just makes sense and will be the first putter I’ve bought new in the 20 or so years I’ve played golf. I know I know, I still have to put a good stroke on the ball but less indecision at address will help a smoother stroke… For me at least.

      Reply

      golfraven

      4 years ago

      Alignment is the latest hype ans so are balls that has those extra lines. Do they work, sure. Does it work with only one line? Absolutely. However. If you don‘t align those suckers consistently (which most players don‘t) you will not see the benefits. I moved away from Odyssey because it‘s like they bring one model after another. Happy with my Scotty Phantom X which has all the alignment and not see myself changing for a decade.

      Reply

      Kevin

      4 years ago

      Definitely interested to see mygolfspy replicate the tests and see their results! Especially the whole 3 lines-different colors/line thickness like discussed in the podcast.

      As for the pace of play, are high hcp golfers gonna spend $250-$300 on a putter? Im a high hcp (bogey golfer) and use the tommy armour impact 3 putter, draw a line on my ball, and use the shaft to line up the putt. Weirdly enough my friends and I like to keep track of our putts for every hole tho we never actually add up our putts per rd at the end, will have to start doing that this yr to see if I am improving on the green. I feel like I three putt less since Ive started using the line and aim technique but dont have the data to see if it’s true for me. My guess would be this aiming sys would help most golfers with one of the main variables (aim) when standing over a putt. IF true, curious if it remains true later in the rd when most weekend golfers have had a few to drink. lol Which I think adds more to pace of play than anything else but which is also one of the main reasons for the weekend golfer to play!

      As for the marketing scheme of having to play the ball, sure I could see it. But specifically for high and mid hcps who aren’t following the rules to a t anyways, why not just use the ball just for putts and switch to a different ball for the rest of the hole?

      Reply

      Bob Wilks

      4 years ago

      I find it difficult to accurately position a penned equator on a ball with my chosen line of putt. For one thing., whenever I take my fingers away, .the plane of the equator never stays vertical For another, whenever I stand up, I find the line is rarely aimed where I want it. So it takes several attempts to get it right.

      Positioning the lined ball correctly takes so much time that don’t feel comfortable doing it.

      If you use this alignment method, how do you avoid those problems?

      Reply

      Spitfisher

      4 years ago

      I feel naked….I don’t use any line on my golf ball, I put the ball down, remove my ball marker. I look at the leading edge of the putter, straight back – straight forward back of the cup. According to my peers I am a very good putter.

      Reply

      Alex

      4 years ago

      I am wary of “unbiased reporting” when an article about this product makes no comment on potential pace of play. Another 20 minutes added to the round for the 20 hcp ensuring their triple tracks are perfectly aligned….. yikes

      Reply

      Dave Wolfe

      4 years ago

      Are you assuming people don’t already use lines? What if someone who doesn’t use a line stands longer over the ball, not hitting the ball because he or she is unsure that the chosen the target line is correct? Is that a fast situation? The system won’t help read speed, but I can see a scenario where it can help the taking the putt speed increase.
      Slow play does suck, but just because something could potentially slow down play, doesn’t mean it will.. For some, this could be the thing that makes someone faster once they address the ball.
      Nice job shaming high HCP golfers too. Never once have I watched a pro take five minutes on a putt…

      Reply

      JT

      4 years ago

      It’s not shaming high handicap golfers to say this ‘could’ give them too much to think about, when the best thing for their game is probably a clear relaxed mind. I agree with Alex to an extent, my first thought on reading this was “people are going to get lost in trying to line up the ball lines with the putter lines and translating that to the stroke line could be challenging and distracting.”

      Always good to try new tech because it could be validated, but speaking of shaming, don’t shame your commentors when they provide a valid point in response to your article. You put together a good write, but seriously, grow a thicker hide.

      Will look forward to your future articles.

      Alex

      4 years ago

      While I appreciate the response, my point was that my golf spy generally is not hesitant to point out the potential negatives of products or product claims. In an article this lengthy, I am surprised there is no mention of the potential to slow down play, even if followed with “but just because something could potentially slow down play, doesn’t mean it will..” As far as the line comment, yes I think the majority of people who use the line on the ball for putting take longer to putt. I even used the line method for awhile, and while effective, I personally found it too time consuming. As far as shaming high handicaps, I only play to a 15 so I shame no one for their ability. However if your not playing for your profession, or high level tournaments than yes you should be conscious of you playing habits and how time consuming they are. If your shooting a 95 you probably have more low hanging fruit to improve your game rather than setting your putts up using a protractor.

      Jcosta

      4 years ago

      More hokey voodoo from the OEMs. Linking a particular ball to a particular putter is as bad as I’ve seen in a long time. You can do the same thing with any putter, ball and sharpie markers. No need to spend ~$300! If you want to get better at putting – practice more often. Find the stroke technique that works best for you and practice, practice, practice.

      Reply

      Ranny Reynolds

      4 years ago

      So, I think I will erase the solid black line on my 15 year old White Hot Two Ball and replace it with a red line and two blue lines. Save $300 with the same results.

      Reply

      JT

      4 years ago

      Odyssey has missed me since I moved away from white hot blade 5yrs or so ago for two reasons, 1) shift to mallet, 2) havent found an eye pleasing odyssey mallet that sits square at address. I’ll be interested to see the new models and give them a test run.

      Reply

      Frank Wiater

      4 years ago

      Looks interesting. We did a test one afternoon on the SAM lab at our practice facility. We used a mirror on the putter face, and a green laser lined up directly over the hole 10 ft away. It was amazing to see just how much people were mis-aligning their putter face based on changing the line configuration on their putters. I would also like to see MGS include a LAB putter in this years putter test. If face balanced VS toe hang really makes a difference, then wouldn’t lie angle balance make more sense? I don’t know, but it would make a dame interesting test.

      Reply

      Frank D.

      4 years ago

      Seeing a straight line, then hitting it, is the challenge. What’s going on before and after the strike is what makes a good putt. If you can’t do that, then starting straight is not going to be a game changer. As far as slowing the game down, in my opinion, if the marshalls at all the golf courses were doing their job, the pace of the game would improve.

      Reply

      W. Stillwaggon

      4 years ago

      Slow play is losing golfers. Lines on the ball has further slowed play. As a caddy in the 1950s, a 4 1/2 hour round was a long time to play 18 holes. Today, 5 1/2 hours is fast. We didn’t have lines of any kind on the ball – now, it takes 15 to 20 seconds per player per hole the align their lined ball. Assuming 2 putts per hole per player, you’ve added at least 36 minutes to a round of golf to align your lined golf ball. The lines on the putter have always been there – get rid of the lines on the ball – save the game.

      Reply

      Joe Hat

      4 years ago

      The math here is way off, by a factor of 3 or 4 depending on whether the writers assessment is 15 or 20 seconds per hole. If it is 20 seconds (EXTRA) per hole to line up a putt with the alignment lines on it, then that’s an additional 40 seconds per 2 putt hole, and an additional 12 minutes per round. Also, I had no 5.5 hour rounds last year (out of 60 plus rounds played, at a variety of courses). Slow players has never been a real issue for me, courses overbooking has been the problem (when it wasn’t weather). If your rounds are regularly taking 5.5 hours, you are likely playing at a poorly managed course that is overbooked, and generally afternoon rounds. Find the right course and play early and you can be done in under 4 easy!

      I wish more ball manufactures offered the alignment grid, particularly my preferred maker Snell!

      Reply

      W. Stillwaggon

      4 years ago

      I assumed 4 golfers playing group. Slow play is hurting golf. During the past 3 years, an average of 2500+ courses have closed per year – slow play has been the biggest complaint for new golfers.

      Martin Healey

      4 years ago

      Slow play is the worst ! To many new players suck. They have all the gear, but zero knowledge of how to play the game. I agree with Frank D. All the Marshall’s do is drive around and offer water on a hot day, if you see them at all. Nothing ruins your rhythm like waiting ten minutes between shots. Tiger woods is a awesome golfer, but he didn’t do the amuture golfer’s any favors. Everything is five times more expensive, than 20 years ago, and still climbing. Five hundred for a driver, three hundred for a putter. Fifty for a box of balls. Friday at the courses is now considered a holiday. Paying the increased rate. How due you grow the game based on that info ? Most of my friends only play one or twice a year, or quit altogether. I love all aspects of the game. But I play less because I can no longer find a playing partner. As my Dad use to say. AH, the good old days !!!

      Jeff

      4 years ago

      Are you saying that players didn’t mark their ball or line up the putt in the 50’s?
      Yes they did.

      Reply

      JP

      4 years ago

      Just wondering whether MyGolfSpy has done any testing to verify the claims in the “Why Is Stroke Lab Better?” graphic?

      Reply

      Nick Aquilino

      4 years ago

      Another sales scam.. Most golfers will not be able to align the lines on the ball with the lines on the putter. To prove my point look at the picture in the write up under the heading Odyssey will be fun to watch in 2020 and it is easily seen the lines on the ball are at a different angle than the lines on the putter. When the brain sees this it will create more indecision. Good luck putting better.

      Reply

      Aaron

      4 years ago

      Parallax error.

      Reply

      Leo

      4 years ago

      Fantastic way to present the idea. Is ERC the only ball with those lines though? I’m guessing the new “better” Chrome soft might use it now. Very curious to see the results in testing.
      And if it works that well, will they try it on a driver? ?

      Reply

      Rob

      4 years ago

      They make a piece of plastic with the triple track lines to sharpie in the triple track on any ball.

      Reply

      DawgDaddy

      4 years ago

      I got one from Amazon Prime for less than $7, it works fine.

      David

      4 years ago

      Add the new $500 putter shaft and your never miss another two foot
      putt again.

      Reply

      Regis

      4 years ago

      The triple track should only add about 1/2 hour to an already slow round. I’m a see putt, hit putt guy but everybody has their routine. A lot of my buddies spend an inordinate amount of time lining up putts only to leave them three feet short. They’ll be first in line to buy the triple track and marching balls. I’ll just load up on cigars. Gonna be a long round

      Reply

      KP

      4 years ago

      Love the putters. Might buy one. Hate the ball. ProV1 every shot. Your pic of how wrong you could be when lining up a putt when using both products is certainly thought provoking but for me I like a blank canvas. So for me, visually, I like looking at the blank side of the ball. No lines. In trying to use an alignment aid on the ball I would end up second guessing myself once I got over the ball, especially on breaking putts.

      Reply

      Sean

      4 years ago

      Interesting concept. I’m curious, I thought there was an old quote from a well known putter guru saying “there’s zero statistical evidence that sight lines improve putting. But people keep buying putter with sight lines. So we make them.”
      I’m paraphrasing, but the reasoning stands. Golf club manufacturers sell things that people buy, regardless of practical application.
      Are we saying there’s now evidence the lines help?
      Time to get that old 3 ball putter out of the garage.

      Reply

      Andy LaCombe

      4 years ago

      So – what if you are like most of us and you do not align the putter like you think you do and this technology points that out? You will be messed up – at least for a while. Maybe you cut your putts with a closed face which yields your reality for zero face angle..

      Also no two of your putts are performed exactly the same – that will mess with your mind IMO. I think there is a lot to be said for no mark on the ball and none on teh putter..

      Reply

      TC

      4 years ago

      It’s often the simplest design ideas are the best. And how often can you improve ball sales as well as putter sales?

      Reply

      bill

      4 years ago

      I love the concept. I used the ball last year, the problem is the ERC goes too far. If they add to the Chrome soft, I would certainly try.

      Reply

      Steve S

      4 years ago

      This is a first for me. I’ve never had a ball that “goes too far”.

      Reply

      george skinner

      4 years ago

      As a golfspy tester and the lab data for putting it will benefit all golfers to construct a putting line on their golf ball to assist in greater putting accuracy and I believe most or all golf ball manufactures will will printing alignment lines on their OEM golf balls. Alignment lines work as proven in GOLFSPY lab testing.

      Reply

      Art

      4 years ago

      George, MGS testing actually indicated the opposite–“Basically, using the line, especially from distances of 10 feet or more, likely does little more than annoy your playing partners.

      Our test revealed that marking the golf ball with a line (as 70% of our test participants reported doing) provides no statistical advantage whatsoever over putting with an unmarked ball.”

      Reply

      Bigskydog

      4 years ago

      Is it 106% for all the putters? Is one exponentially better then another? I suppose they will keep that info in house. Can MGS replicate this type of test?

      Reply

      Steve

      4 years ago

      If this StrokeLab technology is really what it is cracked up to be, then I would think the other OEMs will climb on board. The shaft does not look difficult to duplicate or construct, so I would think the others will mimic it this year unless they fear by doing so they are confirming Odyssey’s positioning. But that never stopped OEMs in the past, lol.

      Reply

      Charles W Keller

      4 years ago

      For those that don’t use Callaway balls how about a MGS test of these putters using balls marked with Eyeline Golf Impact Ball Liner? Or something similar.

      Or not, whatever…

      Reply

      Chiefbrown

      4 years ago

      Where is the center shaft putter? For the double wide

      Reply

      wbn

      4 years ago

      Agree. There are no center shaft putters shown. Why?

      Reply

      john leone

      4 years ago

      WOW! Simplicity at it’s finest! That looks so easy to use, and a genius move by Callaway/Odyssey, make people buy both! I agree however with Jerry, I will not part with my Bettinardi and if I do, it’s because I bought another Bettinardi. I also don’t use Callaway golf balls, although I love the 3 lines they put on their balls. I will just continue to use the one line I have printed on my Bridgestones and hope for the best.

      Reply

      Jaybee

      4 years ago

      It’s a pity they lost so much consumer faith in their ability to make golf balls properly. All we need is a clever entrepreneur to make some kind of golf ball stencil so a Snell (or golf ball of one’s choosing) can be popped into it and the lines added.

      Reply

      ComeOnSense

      4 years ago

      I got 1 from Ebay for less than a $2.
      Look for Golf Ball Line Marker Template then use color sharpies on any ball brand.

      Reply

      JP

      4 years ago

      http://www.tin-cup.com has the TripleTrack stencil. See my comment to Jerry below.

      Reply

      Charlie

      4 years ago

      I’d like to see the improvement over a single line on the ball and putter for alignment. I hate the triple track Callaway ball. But I feel my alignment is perfect with a single line on the ball and putter lined up at address.

      Reply

      JERRY REMIDES

      4 years ago

      The alignment is great. But what if u don’t want to play a Callaway ball. your back to 20 %. I love my bettinadi putter but this is really a improvement aid. I guess a player could make 3 lines on their brand ball. surprised this wasn’t adopted earlier by the putter industry. keep up the great info.

      Reply

      JP

      4 years ago

      Jerry,
      Tin Cup (www.tin-cup.com) makes a stencil for lining balls that replicates the TripleTrack line pattern. It is a custom design so is more expensive than their regular models ($50 vs. $20). You need to contact them to special order it. For some reason, they don’t show it on their website. I definitely aim balls with the Triple Track lines much more accurately than those with a single line and the Tin Cup stencil lets me play balls that don’t have the quality issues that Callaway has.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.