NIKE GOLF – Going Crazy With Tons of Golf Patent Apps!
News

NIKE GOLF – Going Crazy With Tons of Golf Patent Apps!

NIKE GOLF – Going Crazy With Tons of Golf Patent Apps!


Want to see more golf patents…go to Golf-Patents.com

NIKE PATENT #1 – Adjustable Face Stiffness

Lots of interesting club face adjustability patents being applied for in the past couple years, mostly done by Titleist. Although a couple weeks ago Nike got in the mix as well.  They have actually had 4-5 really interesting golf patent applications in the last couple months…today we will show you 2 of the latest to be applied for. This patent app is titled “Golf Club Head or Other Ball Striking Device Having a Reinforced or Localized Stiffened Face Portion”

Patent Description

“A ball striking device, such as a golf club head, has a head that includes a face configured for striking a ball and a body connected to the face. A brace extends from an inner surface of the body or from a perimeter weight system to a contact point on the rear surface of the face. This brace may extend from the sole or a sole oriented perimeter weight member to the rear surface of the face. The brace applies force to the face (at least when the face is flexed by a threshold amount) such that the area of the face surrounding the contact point has less flexibility relative to other areas of the face located away from the contact point. The brace and club head may include structures that allow one to control and customize the force applied to the face.”

Yada…yada…yada. We won’t bore you with the rest of the god awful patent attorney language.  Basically the golfer will have the ability to use multiple types of stiffening rods in woods and irons to provide more force to the face in a particular area(s).  The rods would have different stiffnesses or flex characteristics, different lengths, different materials and different hardnesses.  Here is a picture to help.

PROS

  • Could provide golfer or fitter with adjustable ball flight (rods are different materials & stiffness)
  • Can change the spin rate
  • Also could alter feel
  • Guys with higher swing speeds might like it…could help from faces not caving in

CONS

  • Off center hits could be impacted more then usual
  • Loss of distance if correct rod is not used
  • Breakage of parts inside head could be an issue
  • Too many choices will most likely cause confusion for many golfers
  • Would change CG depending on which type of rod was used

nike golf 2011 patents

Tell Nike what your thoughts are on their new patent app.
Please share your comments below.

NIKE PATENT #2 – Adjustable Face Chambers

This next patent app by Nike Golf is pretty interesting and somewhat similar in regards to face stiffening to the 1st patent we showed above.  They simply changes the rods with multiple bladders that can be filled with viscous types of liquid.

Patent Description

“The head may include one or more stiffening elements or other structures contacting an inner surface of the face, to provide locally increased stiffness to particular areas of the face. The stiffening element includes a chamber adapted to contain a viscous substance. The viscous substance can be selected and inserted into the chamber to create regions of increased stiffness in desired locations, leaving other regions of the face to have increased flexibility as compared to the stiffened regions.” Read full application: nike patent

PROS

  • Could provide exact COR’s to multiple places on face…possibly making almost entire face hot.
  • Could provide golfer or fitter with adjustable ball flight
  • Can change the spin rate

CONS

  • Would be next to impossible for USGA to make ruling on COR limit with all the variables of materials and locations of bladders
  • Hard to determine where to place bladders.  Golfers do not always contact the ball in the same place so it would be ineffective just as much as it was effective for the average golfer
  • Hard to determine final swing weight of club depending on how much viscous material is inserted or removed

Tell Nike what your thoughts are on their new patent app.
Please share your comments below.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Coming Soon – Rife Drivers?

Is This The Future Of Putter Shafts?

For You

For You

Golf Wedges
Apr 16, 2024
Vokey WedgeWorks Low Bounce K Grind Wedge
News
Apr 16, 2024
It Was A Masters To Forget For LIV Golf
Golf Apparel
Apr 16, 2024
adidas Pioneers Next Generation of Lightweight Golf Garments
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Our mission is #ConsumerFirst. We are here to help educate and empower golfers. We want you to get the most out of your money, time and performance. That means providing you with equipment reviews you can trust, as well as honest reporting on the latest issues affecting the game today. #PowerToThePlayer

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Driver Ping G30 Hybrids PXG 0317
3/4 IRON PXG 0311XF 5-GW Srixon Z 565
SW PXG 0317 LW PXG 0311
Putter EVNROLL  
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Henny

      13 years ago

      Look golfers we buy golf equipment like women buy shoes and the golf manufactures know that. This is just another gimmick to get our hard earned monies. We all know in most cases, it’s not the equipment. Having said that I’m sure they will get more dollars from me sooner or later but, it will be because of looks not because I think I’ll play better with said changes.

      Reply

      theSpoon

      13 years ago

      Complexity = higher cost. Wrong tack in this economic climate. Just see how many unsold clubs are in the stores and the deep discounts being offered. That doesn’t happen in a boom market. Rolling out an even MORE expensive technology isn’t going to work for the next five years or so.

      Reply

      clam fist

      13 years ago

      Not interested. Too much guess work. If you get fitted for your clubs, you won’t need this.

      Reply

      Cheymike

      13 years ago

      I think this is going to wind up being one that gets left in the “idea” locker that won’t make it to market. Its a gimmick, period. They can’t change the COR above .083. Anything less and you will lose distance/ball speed. Who is going to want that?
      Moving the CG back… hmmm… I would think the movement would be minimal and doubt that a person could even feel it or see a difference in ball flight.
      I doubt the USGA would allow these ideas, as they could not control the COR (as you so rightly pointed out)
      Nice ideas, but almost seems like a desparate attempt to be “first” with something on the market.

      Reply

      Justin

      13 years ago

      Two words: Gimm. Icks.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Wedges
    Apr 16, 2024
    Vokey WedgeWorks Low Bounce K Grind Wedge
    News
    Apr 16, 2024
    It Was A Masters To Forget For LIV Golf
    Golf Apparel
    Apr 16, 2024
    adidas Pioneers Next Generation of Lightweight Golf Garments
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.