2018 Callaway Chrome Soft & Chrome Soft X – A New Material Changes the Ball that Changed the Ball
Golf Balls

2018 Callaway Chrome Soft & Chrome Soft X – A New Material Changes the Ball that Changed the Ball

2018 Callaway Chrome Soft & Chrome Soft X – A New Material Changes the Ball that Changed the Ball

In just three short years with Chrome Soft, Callaway has established a ball franchise that’s second in popularity only to the Titleist Pro V1. With steady gains in market share, Callaway is positioned as the clear #2 in the ball category. And while that might not sound like the type of stuff bragging rights are made of, it’s significant because, before Chrome Soft, it was Titleist and everybody else. After Chrome Soft, it’s Titleist, Callaway… and everybody else.

That’s great for Callaway, but we can’t overlook the fact that the ball market is changing. With USGA regulations stifling innovation in the ball category, small brands, direct to consumer brands, and even Costco have all nibbled away in a category that not long ago was the almost exclusive domain of big OEM brands. With new low-cost upstart brands emerging on an almost weekly basis, what can the industry leaders do to entice golfers to continue buying their higher priced products?

If you’re Callaway, you reinvent the ball that changed the ball.

cs-box

2018 Chrome Soft and Chrome Soft X

While I punch myself in the face for using the tired phrase, why don’t you take 5 minutes to read through what you need to know about the new Chrome Soft and Chrome Soft X golf balls.

4-Layer Construction

Before we dig into the really interesting stuff, it’s worth a quick mention that both the Chrome Soft and Chrome Soft X feature 4-piece construction. Many a ball designer has suggested that with more layers comes greater ability to tune spin characteristics throughout the bag. Basically, Callaway is throwing everything it has at both balls and not relying on layer count to be a differentiator.

cs-graphene

Graphene

The big story here is the integration of graphene – a one-atom-thick layer of carbon that has all the makings of golf’s next wonder material – in Chrome Soft’s outer core. If graphene is new to you, all you need to know is that, despite its flexibility, it’s believe to be the strongest material on earth.

Graphene is exceptionally strong, lightweight, and flexible. If those don’t sound like the characteristics of a material that lends itself well for use in golf equipment, I don’t know what does.

Thus far, graphene has made its way into Aldila’s new SYNERGY shafts and, of course, the new Chrome Soft. If the material works as well as Callaway says it does, I suspect it won’t be long before we start to see it appearing in clubhead designs as well.

Bigger, Softer, Faster

With respect to Chrome Soft, what the material allowed Callaway to do was make the inner core bigger and softer. Infusing graphene into the outer core allowed that layer to serve as what Callaway describes as a crash helmet for the inner core. Callaway says Graphene allowed it to increase the compression differential (the difference in compression between the two core layers). With the previous materials, Callaway couldn’t make the outer core firmer without the risk of it cracking.

What this all boils down to is a ball that Callaway says retains Chrome Soft’s signature soft feel, while producing more speed throughout the entire bag.

The disclaimer here is that golf ball distance is rigidly capped by the USGA, so anyone who can legitimately claim it’s getting more distance off the driver likely wasn’t near the limit with whatever it’s using as its point of comparison. Given the softness penalty incurred by some higher speed golfers with Chrome Soft, it’s likely that Callaway still had some room under the USGA limit. Similar to TaylorMade’s TP5 story, you’re most likely to see appreciable distance gains in the middle of the bag. If the story holds true, you’ll get those extra yards without sacrificing spin with your short irons and wedges. And of course, you get all of that from a softer feeling ball.

As a brief aside, it shouldn’t surprise anyone that Callaway was first to market with a new material. A little over a year ago, Callaway hired former Nike ball guy, Rock Ishii. Rock has a well-established history of being fearless when it comes to pushing material boundaries in pursuit of real innovation. Whether graphene’s performance lives up to the expectation remains to be seen, but this is exactly the sort of thing Callaway hired Rock to help create.

cs-white

Thinner/Softer Cover

It wouldn’t be Chrome Soft without a soft cover. There’s a risk that improvements in this area could easily get overlooked as part of the larger feel story. That would be a shame since, in addition to offering increased greenside spin, a thinner and softer cover is a more durable cover.

360 Hex Aerodynamics

Callaway’s signature HEX dimples (admit it, you think they look cool) continue forward with the new Chrome Soft. The notable change is that Callaway has implemented a new molding process that creates an entirely seamless cover with more consistent aerodynamic performance.

Increased Forgiveness

The idea of forgiveness is starting to make its way into the golf ball discussion. In most of those cases, companies claim higher MOI as a result of more weight in the outer layers. It works pretty much the same way as it does in club design – the more mass you move away from the center of gravity, the more stability you get. The real-world manifestation is often a ball that’s a little better in the wind.

Callaway’s forgiveness claim is a bit different. The company’s position is that softer balls compress more easily, and so compared to a firmer ball, a soft ball will compress more on off-center strikes leading to more distance.

Bigger Player Number

It’s not exactly a tech story, but Callaway has increased the size (the font size) of the player number on the golf ball. It’s a small cosmetic thing, but it should make the ball standout a bit while helping differentiate it from previous models.

csx-box

Chrome Soft vs. Chrome Soft X

It’s a bit of a surprise that Callaway would release a new version of Chrome Soft X just a year after the original was released, but with the addition of Graphene to the Chrome Soft formula, the company decided to bump up Chrome Soft X’s timeline.

As we said at the beginning, Chrome Soft X features the same 4-piece construction as the non-X version. Compared to the previous generation, Callaway is again saying the new ball is longer through the bag. It offers a lower ball flight, and better control around the greens.

As you’d expect, the majority of Callaway’s Professional Staff is expected to play Chrome Soft X, but the company admits the difference between the two balls is less than what it was with the previous generation.

Both models are softer, they’re appreciably longer with mid-irons, and they provide increased greenside spin.

For most golfers, feel will likely prove to be the deciding factor. While Chrome Soft X is softer than most other X balls, it’s firmer and a bit clickier than Chrome Soft.

The simple advice is to try them both, go with the one you like better.

csx-layers

Higher Price

Callaway’s original Chrome Soft was notable for being the first Tour-level ball to make any sort of impact at a price point below the Pro V1 and other balls in the category. Given that and the feel story, one could argue that Callaway’s two market advantages were feel and price. Feel, though somewhat quantifiable, is subjective. Price is absolute, and in Chrome Soft’s case, it’s going up.

The new ball will retail for $44.99 (up from $39.99). Callaway’s Senior VP of Marketing, Harry Arnett, says the price reflects the complexity of the new manufacturing process. Arnett believes the value is still there, adding “we think it’s by far the best ball in golf.”

In addition to white, Chrome Soft and Chrome Soft X will be available in Yellow and Truvis. Initial Truvis availability will be in white/red and yellow/black. Additional colors will be made available throughout the season.

Retail price for the 2018 Callaway Chrome Soft and Chrome Soft X is $44.99/dozen. Retail availability begins 2/16/18.

Superhot Family Of Golf Balls

superhot

In addition to Chrome Soft, Callaway is introducing the new Superhot family of 3-piece golf balls. A lower priced, distance-centric offering, the Superhot still retains a good amount of greenside control.

Perhaps the larger story here is the addition of BOLD options to the Superhot family. Superhot BOLD features a bright matte finish similar to what’s been offered by Volvik and Wilson. As golfers become more comfortable with something other than white (and yellow), bright options have grown in popularity, so it makes sense for Callaway to offer something in the space.

The Superhot golf ball will be available in white as well as matte yellow, red and orange.

Retail price for the Callaway Superhot family is $29.99/15-pack. Availability begins 2/16/18.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Jason Hutty

      6 years ago

      I hit the new Chrome X yesterday. I generally play either Pro V or B330RX, depending on conditions. My hcp is 3 and my swing speed about 105. The Bridgestone is a way better ball IMO. I think the margins on flight performance and distance are negligible, but the chrome X is SO HARD. It feels bad, and sounds awful. It spins less, and I suppose that could be a good or bad thing depending on what you’re after.

      Reply

      birdiespy

      6 years ago

      Agree. The X is incredibly hard. Usually play the Chrome Soft and love the feel and distance. Also love the Pro V but felt the feel of the Bridgestone was odd.

      Reply

      Jon D

      6 years ago

      Yeah, one more thing. I was kind of hyped up at the possibility of the new Titleist Soft, too bad Titleist couldn’t afford Urethane covers for this offering. It might have been a contender.

      Go figure

      Reply

      Jon D

      6 years ago

      $44.99 a dozen. Too rich for my blood on a consistent basis. If I only lost one a round maybe. I average loosing too many balls per round to play a ball that with tax is over $4 a piece. Now playing the Snell MTB. Can’t tell the difference between those and Pro VIs, except the price.

      When I run out of my current stock of MTBs I am considering the Cut Golf’s Cut Blue or Cut Grey, $19.99 a dozen. If it works, great otherwise I will go back to one of the new Snell top line balls. The Cut and the Snell both have urethane covers. If I really wanted to go super cheap I guess it would be the Costco Callaway superhot 55.

      Reply

      birdiespy

      6 years ago

      golfballdivers.com is a solid solution. also the chrome soft from last season is $31 right now. Never could get into the Snell balls but loved the Vice Pro. good luck.

      Reply

      Troy

      6 years ago

      I switched to the Chrome Soft when it was first released and found it was similar in distance with the driver and fairway woods. Where I noticed a difference was with my irons and wedges, I gained 1/2 club extra distance. I loved it’s feel around the greens and off the putter. The original CS didn’t have the green side spin of other balls. The 2nd generation CS did have extra spin as does the CS X, which I love. I understand the price of the new CS is going up to essentially $45 and is still $4-$5 less then ProV’s with little if any noticeable difference in performance. Had wondered for a few years why so many used the ProV when the vast majority receive no appreciable benefits from a $50 ball over a $40 dollar or less golf ball. When I see mid to high handicappers with swing speeds of 90 mph and less using the ProV’s it akin to using a bazooka hunting deer, it does them no good to spend the extra $$$ for a ball that really isn’t mean for them.

      Reply

      dcorun

      6 years ago

      I won’t say you’ll agree with him or not but, Dean Snell says that the high end balls can help high handicappers like me. The reason is that from 150 yds in is where I’ll see a difference and will not lose much distance off the tee compared to the less expensive balls. I tried his MTB and I did see a difference in my ball finishing closer to the hole because of the spin and shorter putts.

      Reply

      Berniez40

      6 years ago

      The ball that changed the ball, that changed the ball’s price, which in turn changed the sales volume of the new ball which changed the ball.

      Reply

      Steve P

      6 years ago

      Let’s face it. Unless you’re a low handicapper, the ball ain’t the problem.

      Reply

      dcorun

      6 years ago

      SNELL. New for 2018 MTB Black and MTB Red. Best ball on the market. $31.99 doz w/ free shipping.

      Reply

      Felipe

      6 years ago

      Hey Tony nice article, but instead of rushing the story out how about throwing out some numbers data. Nothing too crazy, just the averages of about 10 shots with driver, 7 iron and pitching wedge or lob wedge vs like the other top two competitors. That would be the greater service.

      Reply

      Joe Simmons

      6 years ago

      I’m sorry but the biggest reason for buying the Chrome Soft was feel and price. In the UK sub £28 was fantastic value. Now looks like I’ll have to pay somewhere in the region of £40 to stay with the same brand? I think I’ll be looking at the smaller ball producers you mentioned in the article.

      Reply

      Jerry Noble

      6 years ago

      I have taken all the top golf balls to a tee box on the course. I can’t see any difference in distance in any of them. Around the green, the chrome soft, Taylor made x(I can’t remember if it is to but is the newest model, and the pro v1 x all react the same on short shots and chips. I use the Prov1x because i trust the quality.

      Reply

      Eric

      6 years ago

      Graphene! It’s just shavings from driver heads!!! Lol. Really use google it works and then there’s Wikipedia it’s pretty good too. Thinking you know everything when you know nothing. Congrats ur just like our president

      Reply

      Rich

      6 years ago

      Let me guess, you have all types “how to books”, “videos “, ” the latest gadget club”, believe everything you read but you can’t break 100. No need to look that up on google.

      Reply

      TR1PTIK

      6 years ago

      Grow up dude. First off, Graphene is not made from the shavings of driver heads which are typically made of titanium (and carbon fiber for several of today’s drivers). Secondly even if it were, Graphene is much more than you make it out to be. If you had been paying any attention at all, you’d realize that Graphene is a marvel of technology and science. Graphene has many applications beyond golf and will likely improve many facets of everyday life as cost comes down and it makes its way into more products.

      A decent article that explains how Graphene is actually made can be found here. http://www.techtimes.com/articles/166319/20160621/how-graphene-is-made-and-how-it-was-discovered.htm

      Reply

      Shane

      6 years ago

      Looks like you need to use google for some punctuation lessons!!

      Reply

      Shane

      6 years ago

      My above comment was meant for Eric’s reply!!

      Joe Domill

      6 years ago

      the price change should not matter if the ball performs as they say

      Reply

      GilB

      6 years ago

      “The ball that changed the ball, that changed the ball, that changed the ball, yadah, yadah, yadah.

      Reply

      Andrew Han

      6 years ago

      Cool. I am seeing graphene utilized more. First batteries by Samsung and now the golfing industry.

      Reply

      Duffer E

      6 years ago

      Head (Tennis division) has been using Graphene in their racquets since 2013 (Head YouTek racquets).

      From the graphenetracker.com website:

      “HEAD chose to try and protect not only the use of graphene in rackets, but also in all other sporting goods, including skis, snowboards, golf clubs, and footwear. If the patent is approved with all its claims, it is sure to rake in large profits for HEAD, as other sporting goods manufacturers will certainly follow up with their own explorations of graphene. Strangely though, the patent application does not put a claim on balls made of graphene.”

      So maybe you will, and maybe we won’t see graphene used in clubs anytime soon…

      Reply

      Rich

      6 years ago

      Color : Wilson is already ahead with that flat bright color and low compression.
      Seamless : I thought everyone had gone to seamless except the cheap models.
      The cover Graphene: I guess this is attempt to recycle shavings of graphite from the manufacturing of heads and use it as a filler in the cover material. Not impressed..

      Reply

      Scoot24

      6 years ago

      Based on your un-quantified negative response I would assume you are a Pro-V1 user who is upset that you’ve been overpaying for your balls. Play with the ball and then decide or would that risk you having to say that there’s a better ball out there?

      Reply

      Shane

      6 years ago

      Rich isn’t overpaying… why over pay for something that everyone thinks is the greatest because the pros aybthem, plus they’re GIVEN to them… B’sones spin and stop as good or better for me than ANY Titleist I’ve ever tried. Not a Titleist fan AT ALL…… To each his own they say!!

      snap

      6 years ago

      Graphite and graphine are two different materials. Insert snide comment

      Reply

      Shane

      6 years ago

      If you’d read his reply closely, he says he’s guessing it’s a recycling of shavings etc… Insert here…… Always the latest and greatest. FWIW, it’s not THE ball that reinvented the ball. And I’d bet whatever ya wanted to wager, Rich doesn’t and won’t pay that price or the going price fir a box of Pro Vs!!!!!!

      Art

      6 years ago

      LOL! Filler in the cover material?? More like practical application of a Nobel Prize winning discovery!

      Reply

      Rich

      6 years ago

      WOW ! I can see some of y’all are callycowboys! Yee Haw! OverRated is what it is !
      I won’t pay 50 bucks for any dozen golf balls. I don’t play Pv ball either..Sure as heck won’t play cally either..
      P.S. naw it’s not worth the effort to continue on this anymore!

      Reply

      Nocklaus

      6 years ago

      Well, take a closer look at the precious ProV1 …
      It has a seam !

      Reply

      Rob

      6 years ago

      The major draw to the Chrome soft was the feel/performance BUT at the lower price point. Now that its price has increased to the same level, the appeal (for me) is gone. There are too many other balls out there now such as Snell, Vice, etc that are cheaper and if I’m going to spend the extra money I’ll just get the Taylormade TP5 ball which is amazing or the Bridgestone BXS.

      Reply

      Joe Simmons

      6 years ago

      Not sure about the TM or Bridgestone, but totally agree with your sentiment.

      Reply

      Greg p

      6 years ago

      A $3 price difference vs. the ProV is not enough to make me switch. It will be interesting to see if they are able to maintain that number 2 slot given that price.
      Gotta love them for trying, however.

      Reply

      Dave S

      6 years ago

      Maybe it’s better than direct-to-consumer brands like Snell or Vice, but maybe not. And even if so, I’m willing to be the advantages are marginal at best and certainly not worth paying double the price for the average weekend hacker.

      Reply

      birdiespy

      6 years ago

      Why would most of the tour pros play the X? Bummed on the price– always thought they had an edge by being less expensive than TM and Titliest. Great ball though.

      Reply

      Golfinnut

      6 years ago

      I want to hit one of these to see what all the hype is about. Some ground breaking new material … c’mon … there is always some new buzz word every year, whether it’s balls or clubs, that makes that iteration better than last year. When in fact they could just change the lettering and claim it’s better than last year’s ball when it’s still the same ball. With the talk of rolling the ball back & the caps put on by the USGA, there is only so far you can go into the manufacturing process.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.