First Look – PING i210 Irons
Irons

First Look – PING i210 Irons

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

First Look – PING i210 Irons

PING-i210-106

In January of 2017, Ping launched the i200 series iron, touting its boosted MOI and subtle aesthetic refinements. The net result was a players iron with game-improvement like forgiveness. Now, roughly 18-months later, Ping is replacing the i200 with the progressively refined and meaningfully modified, i210.

Consumers should be rightfully wary of expedited product cycles where products deemed new and improved are certainly the former, but mostly skip the later. Rushing equipment to market has never been Ping’s calling card. Case in point – consumers waited nearly three years for the iBlade to replace the S55, which improved upon the several-year-old S56 model.

The salient point is that when Ping releases product, it’s assuredly different in a way which matters both to the target audience and its tour staff.

PING-i210-101

SO WHAT’S NEW?

The end goal for the i210 was to produce PING’s most precise, best feeling players iron to date in a more visually appealing, crisper package.

As one would expect, the i210 is more of a nip and tuck and less of a complete overhaul. PING again utilizes a 431 stainless steel head and elastomer CTP insert. The i210 remains slotted for the player wanting workability and feel, but needing something a notch more forgiving than the iBlade. Count the likes of Lee Westwood, Daniel Summerhays and Tyrell Hatton amongst the target audience and  25%-30% of Ping’s professional staff playing on a major professional circuit (Web.com, European PGA, PGA Tour) bagging a 200 series iron.

The i200 series produces ample distance, though it doesn’t have the horsepower of the hollow-body i500. That said, a player with an average 4-iron carry distance of 185 yards should expect to pick up 4-6 additional yards of carry in the long irons (due to increased ball speed and higher peak apex) with the new i210. Also, for those still of the mindset that stronger-lofted irons launch lower, that’s not the case with the i210 and i500 which according to PING produce nearly identical initial launch conditions.

PING-i210-100-2

The charge for the mid/short irons was to become more exacting scoring tools, yet do so with a softer feel and traditional spin characteristics. The key to unlocking this combination is PING’s multi-material construction. The elastomer custom tuning port (CTP) is twice as soft and 30% larger than the CTP in the i200s. This results in 25% more CTP surface area to sit up against the iron’s face and with the elastomer more activated (it’s not just for glutes people) the sensation at impact is more dense and muted. Though physics doesn’t allow for it, the ball seems to stick to the clubface fractionally longer.

Generally, PING isn’t prone to hyperbole, but President John K. Solheim opined, “The soft feel of the i210 irons is unlike any we’ve ever offered.”

PING-i210-103

The sole of the i210 has more bounce than the iBlades and a wider sole than the i500s. This provides more forgiveness for shots caught fractionally heavy and more positive club/ball impact. Reduced offset and a cleaner, more defined look in the short-irons again shift the balance in the direction of the tighter look better players often prefer.

“Set” wedges are typically an engineering afterthought with little unique and targeted technology. With the i210, however, PING’s extends its Glide 2.0 groove technology to the pitching wedge and U-wedge. The milled faces and grooves impart up to 400 more RPM, according to PING, which makes it easier to control distance and trajectory from all lies, particularly those of the flyer variety.

Aesthetically, the i210 is sharper and a touch more sophisticated. The cavity, face, and grooves are all precision milled giving the model a posh, somewhat understated appearance. PING removed the toe area loft designation present in the i200s to negate any superfluous visual distractions and the updated HydroPearl Chrome 2.0 finish has more sheen but retains the low friction characteristics which help mitigate the effects when water and other debris are trapped between the ball and club face.

PING-i210-102

Specs, Pricing, and Availability

Like the i200, PING will offer the i210s in a stronger lofted, Power Spec arrangement, but new for the i210 is the Retro Spec array which builds off a 47° PW.  This set up likely caters to the better wedge player, preferring a three-wedge -set up or the player who could benefit from additional spin and bounce throughout the set.

i200spec

The i210 iron is available in 3-PW, UW at an MSRP of $137.50 (steel) and $152.50 (graphite). Stated prices include access to Ping’s standard suite of no up-charge shafts. Pre-Sale begins today (7/16/2018) with consumer availability starting 7/31.

It’s not revolutionary, but it is better – and while PING is never one to sacrifice performance for aesthetics, the i210 might serve as its best effort yet to combine the two in a single tour-ready package.

 

For You

For You

Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
Buyer's Guides
Apr 12, 2024
Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
First Look
Apr 12, 2024
Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
News
Apr 12, 2024
PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris is a self-diagnosed equipment and golf junkie with a penchant for top-shelf ice cream. When he's not coaching the local high school team, he's probably on the range or trying to keep up with his wife and seven beautiful daughters. Chris is based out of Fort Collins, CO and his neighbors believe long brown boxes are simply part of his porch decor. "Isn't it funny? The truth just sounds different."

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Howard

      5 years ago

      Which do you like better, the i210s or Mizuno MP 18 MMCs?

      Reply

      Robert Cangey

      6 years ago

      I purchased the i500 but ended up trading them in. I couldn’t get over the impact sound. The shape was awesome but the sound was brutal. I had tried the i200, but ball speed was too low and the impact was harsh. I played the i25 iron and I was pretty happy with that club. Maybe the i210 will be better?

      Reply

      Dave

      6 years ago

      Just ordered 210s this weekend with Nippon 105 S. 57 YO, 5.5, played with AP2, S300 for years. A couple of months ago tested some P790’s with same 105’s thinking it time to get some more forgiveness and maybe a shaft that took a little less work. Hit them well, bought them. After 6-7 rounds decided I did not like their looks that much (topline in particular) and I did not hit them any further than my AP2’s. Tested 500 and 210 in screens 5 or 6 times. 500 always went 10 years further but 210 was softer. Found a course that had full Ping demo set. Hit 100 balls with both 500 and 210 rotating Nippon 105, Project X LZ and KBS Tour. KBS Tour out early, non-responsive for me. 105 and LZ virtually identical. For me the 210 went just as long as the 500 when I actually hit it on the range and not in the screen and I though it felt a bit better and seemed to be a bit more forgiving on off center hits. Honestly, I think I could have gone either way. Waiting for them to come in. Thank god for the 90 day return policies.

      Reply

      RMK

      6 years ago

      I just ordered the I210’s after a testing/fitting yesterday. They felt fantastic with the right amount of feedback on mishits. My current Apex CF16 combo set was not custom fit to me and never provided me with consistent over the ball confidence so it was time for a change. Should have them next week and can’t wait to game them. I now realize that custom fitting is very important for anyone but especially for those who are not average size.

      67 YO

      6.4 index

      6’5″, 200 lbs

      37″ sleeve and inseam

      Clubs are 1″ over, 2 degrees up, steel reg flex with mid size grip.

      Reply

      Craig

      6 years ago

      Just ordered the I210’s had a fitting the other day absolute pure feeling, got mine with the NS Pro Modus 105Tour shaft, currently play Ping I20’s which are still a great club.

      Reply

      Matt

      6 years ago

      What is the biggest reason you are switching from i20 to i210? I am playing i20 and didn’t experience a big enough difference with the i200 to justify an upgrade.

      Reply

      Johnny Penso

      6 years ago

      I wonder how much dirt, grass and debris will accumulate in that gap left by the insert.

      Reply

      Birdieputt3

      6 years ago

      Having done many Demo Days in the past, I was surprised how many low to mid handicap players came out to be fitted for PING iBlades and walked away ordering the i200’s. Most were there simply to “fine tune” their shaft selection for their iBlades but after they hit the i200 irons, they were sold.
      As a mid handicapper myself, I found the i200’s to be responsive, fairly easy to work with a really nice feel. I can’t wait to try the i210 blades.
      Thanks for a really good review Chris.

      Reply

      Mark Jefferies

      6 years ago

      We had a Ping demo day just last week. I was keen on trying the i200’s, and was disappointed to learn that they were no longer available. How soon might my course, Garrison Golf (Kingston, ON), have a demo set of i210’s available? I have tried the G400 set of irons we presently have, and want to be able to compare.

      Reply

      Frank Wiater

      6 years ago

      I love these improved offerings from Ping. As it states in the article they seem to release more for improvements than regular scheduling. These irons have both a clean aesthetic and should prove to be an improved version to the already proven 200 series. I for one will definitely give these a swing to decide for myself if they are right for my game. Too often I see players jump on hollow body offerings just because of a few yards more distance. But I would gladly sacrifice a few yards for more precise control if they have that verses the distance gain of the I500’s. I’m a numbers guy, and consistent distance front to back and the ability to work the ball, combined with a soft feel is what will sell me.

      Reply

      Count Tyrone Rugen

      6 years ago

      That insert gap tho….

      Reply

      Rob C

      6 years ago

      I got to try this iron over the weekend, and came away liking it a lot. I had previously demoed the I200 a few times, and despite all the love it was getting online and among my golf network, I didn’t “feel” it.

      Now as a mid to high cap (17) some will scoff at someone of my level talking about feel, but it exists, we all feel things differently regardless of our playing ability. The 200’s just felt harsh, and sure some of that may have been due to less than perfect contact.

      However, the I210’s in the first go round with them, felt as Mr. Solheim said, much softer. I look forward to giving this iron more demo time in the future.

      Reply

      Steve

      6 years ago

      Why were the 500’s out of your range Rob? The price, or did you have trouble hitting them?

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
    Buyer's Guides
    Apr 12, 2024
    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
    First Look
    Apr 12, 2024
    Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
    News
    Apr 12, 2024
    PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.