Bold Color, Bold Shaping – The Aeroficient Cobra KING F9 SPEEDBACK DRIVER
Drivers

Bold Color, Bold Shaping – The Aeroficient Cobra KING F9 SPEEDBACK DRIVER

Bold Color, Bold Shaping – The Aeroficient Cobra KING F9 SPEEDBACK DRIVER

Let’s get real.

More often than not, the only problem golf companies are trying to solve is lack of new product. It’s rare when a company starts with a problem and offers a product as an actual solution. Tired as it may be to some of us, Fast and Forgiving in all its various forms still sells, so there’s no reason for our friends at the equipment companies to wander too far off script. A good story and more of the same is, more often than not, a recipe for success.

That’s why, for me anyway, it’s refreshing when a golf company can clearly layout the design challenge it sought to overcome and then explain how it was able to solve a particular problem. Case in point, the Cobra KING F9 SPEEDBACK. Yes, yes, the end result is still fast and forgiving, but at least there’s some substance to how we got here, which is why I’m willing to give Cobra a pass for making up a word (Aeroficient) to describe the design of its new driver.

Aerodynamic and Low CG Don’t Mix

The problem, as Cobra sees it, is that to get good aerodynamic properties, you have to sacrifice in other places. Better aerodynamic can translate to faster swing speed and ultimately faster ball speeds in a way the USGA doesn’t regulate. But, when you look at the drivers with good aerodynamic properties – PING G400, TaylorMade M4, Callaway Rogue, what you find are center of gravity locations that range from mid (PING and Callaway) to high (TaylorMade).

Raised/domed crowns, turbulators, etc. all that stuff that makes for better aerodynamics pushes weight up and the center of gravity invariably follows. Almost everybody claims low and back. Almost nobody actually is. That’s especially true with aerodynamically efficient designs.

So how you do you make a more aeroficient driver? Cobra’s solution was to reshape the driver in some seriously aggressive ways. Considering how adverse golfers are to anything remotely non-traditional, it’s fair to say Cobra is making a bold move with F9 SPEEDBACK. Will golfers be receptive? I’m not sure, but I love that Cobra is going for it.

Aeroficiency

Aeroeficiency (I hate myself) begins with a crown that’s 12% larger than F8’s. The larger crown requires a bit of stiffening to prevent energy loss, so Cobra uses a what it calls PWR Ridges to enhance stability (and possible aid in alignment). Normally a big crown is a recipe for higher CG, but with F9 SPEEDBACK, Cobra actually wraps the crown (image below) into the skirt (the side) section of the driver. Despite the larger surface area, Cobra saves about 4 grams.

Next Cobra raised the entire skirt and the rear sections of the club. It creates a slightly boxier look with a trailing edge flat enough to mount a license plate on. The raised back end – think about the rear of a Ferrari –reduces aerodynamic drag. To my eye, it looks like a bigger, more exaggerated take on PING’s Vortec, albeit without the cavity. A bit more drag reduction still is achieved by way of rounded leading edges on the crown and sole.

 

If that was all the engineers did, you’d have an aerodynamically efficient driver with the highest CG of any non-Max Cobra driver in recent memory. To pull the weight back down, Cobra added a big chunk of mass to the bottom rear of the club where sole and skirt meet. It’s a bit like a fin or the keel of a boat. Pictures don’t do the best job at conveying how unique the shaping is, but it’s the signature design feature of the F9 SPEEDBACK.

The driver looks conventional at address, but side and sole views reveal that it’s perhaps the most radically different take on driver shaping since Callaway and Nike took their shots with square.

To validate the aerodynamic properties of the new driver, Cobra did some robot testing against the competitive set. It added mass where needed to ensure all drivers were the same weight and used the same shaft in every head. Under the same force, the KING F9 SPEEDBACK was a bit faster than M4, faster still than G400, and about 1.5 MPH faster than the Callaway Rogue. Mind you, this test was force equivalent to 120 MPH of head speed, so the differences are more pronounced than the average golfer should reasonably expect. The takeaway is that Cobra believes that the F9 SPEEDBACK driver has the best aerodynamics in golf.

With the aerodynamics and center of gravity stuff mostly out of the way, let’s look at some other features of the Cobra F9 SPEEDBACK.

Discrete Lofts

At the risk of minimizing the importance of the SPEEDBACK design, it’s my non-negotiable opinion that the most significant upgrade cobra made to its 2019 driver lineup is a move back to discrete lofts. Going as far back as Amp Cell, Cobra was in a group with Nike, TaylorMade, and Mizuno that, at one time or another, leveraged an all lofts in one head design philosophy. One head, one loft, a ton of hosel settings, and boom, one size fits all – at least that was the theory. TaylorMade was one and done (R1) with the idea. Nike left the golf business, and last year Mizuno moved back to discrete stamped lofts. For 2019, Cobra is doing the same. Finally!

With F9 SPEEDBACK Cobra will offer discrete 9°, 10.5° and 12° heads. Junior and Women’s heads will be stamped 12.5°. I’d wager the significance of this particular change is going to show up in next year’s Most Wanted testing. Over the past several seasons, Cobra has almost invariably been near the top in driver ball speed, but we’ve had issues with a segment of our testers hitting them straight. I’ve long suspected the face angle implications that come with loft adjustments were at least part, if not all, of the problem. I can’t overstate how big of a deal this is from a performance and fitting standpoint.

With the change to discrete lofts comes a tweak to the Cobra adapter. Physically and functionally, the adapter is unchanged . The cobra tips you have will work just fine, but instead of using absolute lofts, the new adapters show the amount of adjustment (+1°, -1.5°, etc.) rather than an absolute loft. You can still adjust by 1.5° in either direction, and there are still upright settings, but it’s a cleaner way to show the degrees of change and eliminates the confusion that came from dealing with standard and plus adapters.

The 9° head is the + Model

Deviating from the last several years, Cobra will not offer a F9+. Instead, Cobra is handling the needs of the typical plus (+) player a bit differently. The mass properties (center of gravity, MOI, etc.) vary between lofts. The 9-degree head is designed to be a true spin killer. That comes via a lower and more forward CG.

Cobra acknowledges that launch and spin difference between F8 and F8+ didn’t prove to be significant. That should be different with the F9 SPEEDBACK. For the faster swinger or the guy that needs to kill spin, the 9° SPEEDBACK should drop spin by about 500 RPM over F8+.

The 10.5° and 12° lofts should perform more like previous standard models. That means a bit higher trajectory and bit higher MOI.

Loft Specific Low Face Radii

As with previous designs, the F9 will offer dual roll. What that means is that the curvature of the face from top to middle isn’t the same as it is from middle to bottom. By using dual roll, Cobra is better able to optimize launch conditions on mishits above or below center. What’s different this time around is that the low face radii will differ between lofts. The premise is that higher speed players don’t need as much help getting low face shots in the air, and they certainly don’t want the spin penalty that comes from more loft. The lower roll radius of the 9° head will produce a lower launch than it will in the 10.5°. Along the same lines, slower swing speed players – guys who play 12° heads – need higher launch and more spin on low face hits, so the lower roll radius is designed to produce higher launch on a low face miss.

Milled Face

We covered Cobra’s milled face story last year. The company maintains that CNC milling the face allows it to more consistently produce its bulge and roll radii and dial in the thickness of each region to maximize ball speed. The design hasn’t change in any notable way from F8, but it’s nonetheless worth mentioning.

Movable Weights

Cobra has been all over the map with its movable weight systems in recent years. With F9 SPEEDBACK, it’s sticking with a familiar 2-weight, front to back system. The weights themselves are 14g and 2g. Hopefully, you know how this works by now. Put the heavy weight in the front for lower trajectory and spin. Put the heavy weight back for a higher trajectory, a bit more spin, and an MOI boost.

Cobra’s ability to move mass and impact ball flight is always among the best in the industry and the system itself is incredibly efficient in that there’s not much mass tied up in the structure to support the weights. It’s also simple enough that most golfers can understand it. Bottom line, it’s not a wheel that needed reinventing. Cobra did well not to overthink it.

It’s perhaps noteworthy that weights themselves look like smaller versions of what was used on Fly-Z+. That’s a driver that many remember fondly and some still play. That small detail may boost interest in the driver, while the bold yellow colorway ensures it won’t be missed.

About that Paint

Let’s put it out there. The yellow is bold. Not since Sasquatch has a club manufacturer dared go all-in or almost all-in on yellow. It’s going to be polarizing, but Cobra is at its best when it takes risks. Cobra thinks yellow is a fast color (during the product presentation it showed pictures of yellow Ferraris, Lamborghinis, and Formula 1 cars), and well, we’ve already talked about the importance of fast. The company showed Rickie prototypes in several different colorways and Rickie chose yellow – even over Orange. Rickie liked the yellow, so you get yellow.

For those who don’t have the stomach for yellow, Cobra is offering a safe color. Avalanche sits somewhere between frost white and light gray. I was leaning heavily avalanche myself, but when I was fit into the Project X HZRDUS Yellow, the yellow accented head just felt right. A little color never hurt anyone.

Stock Shafts & Grips

Cobra will gain be using 100% real deal shafts that should fit a wide range of golfers.

  • For those seeking low launch and low spin, Cobra is offering the Fujikura ATMOS Black TS 7 (S,X).
  • The new Project X HZRDUS Smoke 60 (S,X) provides low-mid launch.
  • The Fujikura ATMOS Blue TS 6 (R,S,X) is the middle of the road offering.
  • For slower swing players and those needing higher launch, Cobra is offering the UST Helium 50 (R,L)

Gearheads will likely notice that the ATMOS shafts offered by Cobra are black instead of the familiar ATMOS white. According to Cobra, due to Tour player demand, Fujikura has started making some ATMOS profiles in black. I’ve confirmed with Fujikura that the shafts are exactly what Cobra says they are. Cobra felt the new black colorways looked better with its yellow and avalanche heads.

The stock grip is a Cobra Connect enabled Lamkin Crossline 58+. Cobra is working with other grip manufacturers and expects to expand its offerings beyond Lamkin in the not so distant future.

Retail price for F9 Speedback Driver is $449. Availability begins January 18, 2019.

For more information, visit Cobragolf.com.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Ted Apostolos

      5 years ago

      I play the f9 and wondering if Cobra is planning an f9 440cc driver. Thanks

      Reply

      NutdanaiP

      5 years ago

      If i use King Ltd adaptor, how can i set up the new F9 9-loft with King Ltd adaptor. Thank you.

      Reply

      Sean

      5 years ago

      Any testing done putting a 2nd 14g weight in?
      Could bring swingweight up if I cut the shaft down to 44.5” myself.

      Reply

      Bwpage3

      5 years ago

      How many c.c’s Is the pro version?

      Reply

      Maxx hotton

      5 years ago

      Ive seen they claim an aerodynamic efficiency increase from the f8 of 5% and 12% from the previous driver. What would be the estimated increase in clubhead speed?

      Reply

      Juan

      5 years ago

      I saw on a YouTube video that it should translate into a 2 MPH difference.

      Reply

      Tim C

      5 years ago

      Well written, Tony, and full of “insider” knowledge.

      Reply

      Nik

      5 years ago

      I cant wait to hear your reviews on this club, hopefully you guys will be able to set this up in one of your forum reviews, would love to have a shot at testing this one out. I almost bought a F8+ but that def on hold till I can try this new one out!

      Reply

      retired04

      5 years ago

      Tony-any draw bias when you loft up-10.5 to 11/11.5/12? F8+ with heavy wt up front was my longest, however my draw ceased to exist no matter how much lead tape I used ( I play 44 7/8″ drivers so the tape brings it back to std swg wt). Thanks

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      5 years ago

      There is an upright settings, which is one method used to create a draw bias. Adding loft also closes the face, which can help start the ball more to the left, can also influence a closed relative to the path face angle which can also promote a draw.

      Reply

      boggey55

      5 years ago

      The F9 driver is really appealing to me!!! I play cobra irons and love them. I could see this driver in my bag!!! I LOVE the yellow color and look forward to trying out this beauty!!!

      Reply

      Matty

      5 years ago

      If Taylormade used that yellow and red combination in their woods, there will be some criticism.

      Reply

      mackdaddy

      5 years ago

      Damn I really like the looks of the yellow version. I will have to find one to hit.

      Reply

      Brandon

      5 years ago

      So who wants to sell me their F8+ for 100 bucks?

      Reply

      James lebran

      5 years ago

      Adam hit magnus and cortex for highest smash factor….samthought rozwell would interest yo

      Reply

      Don

      5 years ago

      Aeroeficiency is still better than “RocketBallz”

      Reply

      Johnny Penso

      5 years ago

      If the top is aeroeficient I guess that makes the bottom aerodeficient? It’s funny how they can spend so much marketing effort on the efficiency of the top of the club hoping no one realized that 50% of the air passing over the clubhead is going across the sole ? ? ? ?.

      Still it’s a sharp looking driver to me and will be in consideration when I go to get fitting for something new in the spring (maybe).

      Reply

      Dave S

      5 years ago

      That “Speedback” feature is very reminiscent of the Adams Speedline driver from about a decade ago.

      Reply

      Stacey

      5 years ago

      Exactly what I was gonna say, the 9064ls

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      5 years ago

      I still have a 9064LS head hear. There’s really not much in the way of similarity in the sole design.

      Clay Nicolsen

      5 years ago

      Ok, Cobra has me interested! Time for a new driver anyway, and btw, I love the yellow!

      Reply

      gunmetal

      5 years ago

      Looks like an F8 with a new paint job and marketing story.

      Not a bad thing, btw. F8 is a beast.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      5 years ago

      Radically different shape. Other than the face, not much similarity to the F8.

      Reply

      Nick Dear

      5 years ago

      I was the golf shop last week and wanted to hit the F8+ to just get a feel before getting fitted for the F9 in January. One of the fitters there has had lots of time with the F9 and said it’s not worth even hitting the F8. F9 has a totally different feel and is much more forgiving. He says it’s going to sell like crazy this year!

      Ciri Cuenco

      5 years ago

      cobra always produced some really good, easy to play, very forgiving clubs. I can’t wait to test this driver! Mahalo

      Reply

      Tim

      5 years ago

      I’m suddenly hungry for hot dogs….with the subliminal ketchup and mustard colors you know.

      Reply

      MG

      5 years ago

      Any word if they will release a “tour length” version around 44.5 inches?

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      5 years ago

      You can order whatever length you’d like through custom and they’ll swing weight it how you want it.

      I believe Rickie is still playing a sub-44″ driver, but the average length on tour is now over 45″.

      Reply

      JR2

      5 years ago

      “Aeroeficiency (I hate myself)” – ha! crackin’ me up while reading this. ?

      Having just picked up the F8 a few weeks ago, I’ll say that the weights made a huge difference for me. And – on the F8, the weighting options are draw or high (vs low or high). In the F8, low is not an option. In the F9 draw is not an option. Am I seeing that right? Given the large number of slicers out there looking for quick correction, it seems like they’d want to keep that option in as a selling point.

      Reply

      Clayobx

      5 years ago

      I’m not fond of the yellow but add the appropriate yellow shaft, kinda sizzles! Just sold one of Fly Z + yesterday. Unfortunately never played well with it. Will give this a demo and see, info all reads well.

      Reply

      Bryan S.

      5 years ago

      Nice looking driver. Cobra has always made great products. I think marketing the dual roll may have reached more golfers and proved more beneficial. It is a great idea as we all know low strikes are typically more punishing than most. Just my opinion.

      Reply

      mike

      5 years ago

      is the face open, closed or straight on 9 and 10.5 degree ?

      Reply

      JayBee

      5 years ago

      Does it still have the Smart Sole? I was never wholly sure about that piece of tech until I compared my F6+ to an adjusted a Callaway X Hot and saw how closed the X Hot looked when loft was added. It gave me a sense of comfort when making loft adjustments to the F6+ that it would still sit square.

      Reply

      Steve S

      5 years ago

      Cobra’s testing proves what I’ve been saying for years. Aerodynamics means virtually nothing to the majority of golfers; most of them have swing speeds in the 80-90’s mph.

      The other design features are the true highlight to this new club, but much harder to make into marketing sizzle.

      Reply

      Nihonsei

      5 years ago

      This driver looks fresh and high tech. Maybe I can afford a new-used driver after this launches!

      Reply

      Mike

      5 years ago

      Bold it is!!!! Just wondering if I can stand to look at it. If it preforms I’ll prob get used to it quickly.

      Not a whole lot of mention regarding forgiveness Tony. Prob don’t have access to them yet.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      5 years ago

      MOI is going to be somewhere in the 4800-4900 range, I believe. Like most in the industry, Cobra takes a holistic approach to forgiveness, which is best represented in our shot area metric. In their robot testing, the F9 was the most consistent (smallest dispersion area) of the drives they tested (Rogue, G400 Max, and M4 – if memory serves).

      Reply

      Jonathan

      5 years ago

      You mention Cobra take a holistic approach to forgiveness, could you explain that a bit more please. Even though the MOI is approx 600 lower, would you say it is as forgiving the G400 Max?. Thanks.

      B.Boston

      5 years ago

      How much of a difference in forgiveness between the 9 and 10.5 model?
      For the MOI metric anyway.

      Tider992010

      5 years ago

      I like this. Looks like a return to the Speed Pro driver from 7-8 years ago.

      Reply

      David

      5 years ago

      How do the fins compare with Ping’s Turbulators? Looks to be less in number but are they more pronounced? Any risk of patent infringement?

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      5 years ago

      Unlikely. Callaway has used crown features for a few releases now. Cobra had features on the F8 as well.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.