First Look – 2019 TaylorMade M5 and M6 Irons
Irons

First Look – 2019 TaylorMade M5 and M6 Irons

First Look – 2019 TaylorMade M5 and M6 Irons

TaylorMade is a company that understands metalwoods. Like or loathe the brand; it invariably produces woods that perform. Irons have been more of a mixed bag.

For a long time, TaylorMade has made great players irons. Having historically had the largest tour staff they’ve needed to cater to better players. With the P790 it produced an iron that caught fire in the public consciousness. Despite the PXG lawsuit or maybe because of it, its hollow speed foam filled design produced distance and forgiveness while looking good.

But when TaylorMade hits Big Bertha territory, the land of the Ping G series, well, it fails to get any consistent traction. Outside of RocketBladez, we can’t think of a significant success for the Carlsbad based company in this arena. TaylorMade is hoping M5 and M6 change that. We’re not sure they will.

SpeedBridge

The big technology play this year in TaylorMade’s irons is the SpeedBridge. A single beam of steel that connects the sole to the crown of the iron it is designed to stabilize the head at impact. Positioned exactly at the point that vibrates most at impact, it works with the Speed Pocket to improve sound and feel while creating the requisite more ball speed. Essentially, it’s a jailbreak for irons. Or Slingshot on its side. TaylorMade claims its design is revolutionary by stiffening the face allowing for more energy transfer at impact. We’d argue it’s borrowed at best.

The design is clever, as it’s a one-piece casting which builds in more consistency than would be provided by a welded secondary piece. TaylorMade says it has been working on the SpeedBridge for a while, but it’s only now they’ve been able to make it light enough, yet strong enough to do what it’s meant to do.

Nearly everything in golf equipment design boils down to strength to weight ratios,

Because of the Speed Bridge, this is the first time TaylorMade have used a thru-slot Speed Pocket which allows the face to flex more, especially on thin strikes. According to TaylorMade, this makes the new irons faster than the M3 and M4. TaylorMade has had durability issues with their slotted irons in the past, so it’ll be interesting to see if this design not only performs but holds-up long term. Our cynical side wonders if the supporting SpeedBridge might be the reaction to those iron breakages.

Golfers say they hate badges in irons, but manufacturers keep using them. Both new iron models feature a HYBRAR dampening system and a multi-material badge that TaylorMade says helps improve the feel at impact. The sound and feel on both irons is crisp and sharp. It’s not a forged feel, and it’s not a SpeedFoam feel either, but it’s ok and decent for the category of iron.

M6

The bigger of the two irons, the M6 features carryover design traits like the weight saving fluted hosel which helps them put weight lower in the head. The 360-degree undercut cavity back does much the same, and the Inverted Cone design behind the face increases ball speed on miss hits. These are an easy to hit, high launching iron. Lofts are strong, but the launch is high, and the ball goes far. Beyond that, there’s nothing that particularly stands out about the design.

Available in 4-9-iron, GW, PW, SW & LW they come equipped with KBS Max 85 steel shafts (S, R) or Fujikura’s ATMOS Orange graphite shafts (7S, 6R & 5A). For women, the M6 irons will come equipped with the TaylorMade Tuned Performance shaft.

M5

Exactly where you expect them to be size and offset-wise, the M5 is a bridge between the M6 and the P790. The monochrome badging is meant to appeal to a more serious golfer than the M6. The design is overall very similar to the M6, albeit with a thinner top line, and a half fluted hosel to minimize distractions at address. Other than the smaller head, tungsten weight low in the head on the 4-7 irons highlight the distinctions between the two models. Less obvious changes include a pre-worn chamfered leading edge to improve turf interaction.

Available in 4-9-iron, GW, PW, SW they come standard with True Temper’s XP100 steel (S, R) or Mitsubishi’s Tensei Orange graphite (S, R) in addition to numerous additional custom shaft options.

TaylorMade is adamant that a cavity back design is still higher performing for the average golfer than one of their recent hollow designs as it allows them to push the center of gravity deeper and lower in the head. But will the average golfer agree?

Visually these don’t have any of the DNA and shelf appeal that they brought to the table with the P790 and other P-series irons. I’m personally not a fan of the look of the double-chamfered topline. We can understand making the topline thinner, but the chamfering on the face looks odd and adds weird unnecessary angles to the club at address. And while we understand strengthening lofts, a 19 degree 4-iron in a game improvement iron? That’s a 2-iron..maybe a 3-iron.

While the M5 and M6 irons are perfectly good clubs, there’s a case to be made that they don’t match up to their driver and fairway wood designs.

Retail price for the M6 iron is $899 steel/$999 graphite. The M5 are $100 more at $999 steel and $1099 graphite. Pre-orders begin January 18th with full availability starting 2/1.

For more information, visit TaylorMadeGolf.com

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Our mission is #ConsumerFirst. We are here to help educate and empower golfers. We want you to get the most out of your money, time and performance. That means providing you with equipment reviews you can trust, as well as honest reporting on the latest issues affecting the game today. #PowerToThePlayer

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Driver Ping G30 Hybrids PXG 0317
3/4 IRON PXG 0311XF 5-GW Srixon Z 565
SW PXG 0317 LW PXG 0311
Putter EVNROLL  
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      AG

      4 years ago

      It’s funny reading these comments. I scooped up some of these irons (m5) having previously owned the m2s. Looks for anything in life is all subjective. As for performance? They are great. Would one prefer the feel or sound of a more premium iron? Of course! Hence the mark up of the p790s. No lie, I want to trade up to p790s for the feel and sound but the m5s are not bad. Especially if you’re not a tour pro lol .

      Reply

      Mike Mendoza

      4 years ago

      I just plunked down $2500 for a full set of fitted TMM6. Look, I’m no great golfer (for now I shoot in the honest mid 90s), but these clubs have improved my drives by 30 yards at least. Beautiful sound on contact, and a nice weight and rhythm during my swing. Professional swing instruction at #golftec helps too..

      Reply

      James

      5 years ago

      Wow, all the negative comments by ones who hadn’t even touched the irons.
      I tried them at the superstore and was impressed. Bought a 5 & 7 iron off eBay with the TR stiff shaft for $65 in an auction. I have been hitting them for two months and have been extremely impressed with the feel, the sound, the ball flight and workability.
      It is a very easy club to hit and looks good at address.
      Just my two-cents.

      Reply

      TrailorMade4Life

      5 years ago

      Gota love the 19.5* 4 iron, right?! Only 4.5* strong. All that extra distance is definitely coming from the “speed bridge” and the “speed slots.” Next their going to start throwing parts from F1 cars on these!
      #TrailorMade

      Reply

      Ol'pal Gary

      5 years ago

      Remembering that these are the Game Improvement irons, i’ll hold most of my negative thoughts until they make the rounds with, the golf reviewers & their Quad analyzers.
      All I can say is as they show with the price they’re asking, i’ll be staying with my M2 Tour irons.

      Reply

      Tom

      5 years ago

      The M5 at address looks almost identical to a JPX 919 which I’m sure all you TM naysayers think looks great. The M5 looks like a perfectly nice iron in the category it’s intended for.

      Reply

      JC

      5 years ago

      Puke!! Just awful. Feel sorry for whoever pays real money for things like this. I use the word things, because I think it would insult my intelligence to call them golf irons. TM will be hittin’ the skids in the near future.

      Reply

      Joshua Hudson

      5 years ago

      Not one positive comment?

      Reply

      mackdaddy

      5 years ago

      I hope they kept the Apex irons because these don’t look like anything I would like to hit.

      Reply

      Brad

      5 years ago

      “SpeedBridge”??

      Bwahahahaha.

      SpeedSlot”, “Speed Pocket”,”RibCor”, “SpeedFoam”‘, “Speed Holes”, etc., etc. and they still don’t really feel or perform any better than a set of old Ping irons from 15-20 years ago….

      Reply

      80onthefront

      5 years ago

      Who was the second guy who said “yeah, they look awesome-we’ll go with this design”?

      Reply

      shortside

      5 years ago

      $900 on lessons with a good teaching pro would probably be more productive. Though I might be underestimating the hidden powers of the “speed bridge”.

      Reply

      The Dawson

      5 years ago

      Meh is all I can say. These actually look less appealing than every iteration of M1/M2/M2 Tour/M3/M4 they have made up to this point. As someone said above, the correct move was to make P series GI iron, and let anyone else who wants an affordable TM set to buy the RBZ 2.0 sets they are still pumping out.

      I feel like these M series irons have just become something to package with hybrids or sell to an image conscious golfer who wants “all M6” clubs or something. There is nothing new here, these are so pointless.

      Reply

      Joro

      5 years ago

      Pump em up, make the Hell out of them and get them outta here so we can start on another one.

      Reply

      Dave S

      5 years ago

      It’s funny the line these OEMs have to straddle with their GI iron ranges. On one hand, we’re seeing a shift back to more muted, silver/chrome/black designs, which serve to make the GI iron look more like a better player’s iron at quick glance (this makes sense; I assume most people don’t like having to advertise the fact that they’re not that great at golf by bagging an ostentatious set of irons). On the other hand though, the OEM’s cant make them TOO pretty or they’ll eat into their player’s iron revenue (this also makes sense; no stick golfer wants to play irons that look just like some weekend hack’s when there are a plethora of options out there to choose from). It’s like the R&D and Marketing departments get together and go “Lets make this look good, but not TOO GOOD”… and out pop the new M6/M6 Range.

      Reply

      Ian

      5 years ago

      The ‘SpeedBridge’ appears to be half the cross-cavity design that appeared on the Adams XTD range in 2014, clubs that also had ‘Cut-Thru’ slot technology. It allowed them to move CGs and have a thinner face whilst also creating a hybrid type gearing effect for off-centre hits.

      History repeats itself even, it appears, in technology.

      I’m still gaming the Tour versions (The Adams irons not history – apparently the tour version of history is much less forgiving).

      Reply

      Thomas

      5 years ago

      Look emend worse than the old pings

      Reply

      Berniez40

      5 years ago

      I’m sort of, “Meh”, about these new irons, but then again, it doesn’t look like I’m exactly all alone at giving these “TaylorMade Slingshots” a side long glance. Tell me true…was it a misprint, or does neither of these sets offer a Gap Wedge? I mean seriously,….. no gap wedge?!?!

      Reply

      Mark

      5 years ago

      Yes M5 Has a Gap and a sand, the M6 has gap sand and lob.

      Reply

      Steve P

      5 years ago

      Good God these are cheesy looking! What were they thinking?

      Reply

      HDTVMAN

      5 years ago

      So if these are so much faster than the M3/M4, then the M1/M2’s that you paid $800+ for were real turtles! So does this mean, in 6-8 months when the M7/M8 are released, these new M5/M6 will become turtles, too?

      Reply

      Spitfisher

      5 years ago

      What the marketing people at Taylormade failed to realize is the needed an oversized 790.

      I mean they know the excitement ( read: $ales) that the 790 made, they hit a home run with it. what they needed is something a little bigger, a little more offset and game improvement to set themselves apart from the 30 other irons out there at the 900 to 1200 price point.

      This isn’t rocket (balls) science!

      Reply

      HDTVMAN

      5 years ago

      TM needs a “Super” OS P790 priced at $1999+. Remember, like PXG, the more expensive the club, the better it will perform. That’s the marketing truth!

      Reply

      10shot

      5 years ago

      ouch HDTVMAN…that one hurt :)

      ~j~

      5 years ago

      Can someone please tell TM to quit while they’re ahead. The P700-series seems well enough for all types of golfers, why even release these unflattering mudshovels.

      Reply

      Gunter Eisenberg

      5 years ago

      The Taylormade marketing machine is still humming along.

      Reply

      Wally

      5 years ago

      In one word disappointed. Somehow and not just TM but Callaway and others as well, I’m not buying the stronger lofts are necessary because of the added tech in the irons. Just doesn’t make sense.

      Reply

      shortside

      5 years ago

      They all have some offerings with traditional lofts or close enough to it. These aren’t for you.

      That said why people will spend thousands on clubs in an attempt to cure their ails but never drop a dime on professional swing help is beyond me. Then there’s those that think it’s a linear process. A lesson or two and I should be magically better. Most often not. You often get worse first. Takes a little time and a commitment to change a swing you’ve ingrained for years.

      All that said I’m sure those new Mizuno’s will improve my game. And make people will like me more.

      Reply

      10shot

      5 years ago

      WOW, as many of my post will show, I’m not a fan of Tour Edge. This is due to some of their rules about club warranty.

      Now with that disclaimer,
      The new M5/6 look a lot like the Tour Edge irons from 5 years ago with the open speed slot. I know my old TE hit well until they broke.

      Reply

      RMJR

      5 years ago

      These look like irons Nike would be making if they were still in the golf biz.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.