Ball Lab – Top Flite Gamer Golf Ball Review
Golf Balls

Ball Lab – Top Flite Gamer Golf Ball Review

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Ball Lab – Top Flite Gamer Golf Ball Review

MyGolfSpy Ball Lab is where we quantify the quality and consistency of the golf balls on the market to help you find the best ball for your money. Today, we’re taking a look at the TopFlite Gamer. An overview of the equipment we use can be found here. To learn more about our test process, how we define “bad” balls and our True Price metric, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

An image showing Top Flite Gamer Golf Balls

Top Flite is a DICK’S Sporting Good’s house brand which gives the giant retailer the flexibility to make Gamer whatever it wants. With its urethane cover, the prior generation flirted with the “Tour” category. With this most recent iteration, the company is resetting the Gamer franchise. It’s revisiting its roots as an affordable ionomer-covered ball with a bit of a  performance slant.

About the Top Flite Gamer

The Top Flite Gamer is a three-piece ball with an ionomer cover.

The Gamer is a bit firmer than most balls in the “premium ionomer” category. The soft-ish cover is designed to generate slightly more spin. As with other DICK’S Sporting Goods balls, the most attractive feature may be the price. At $22.99 per dozen, the Top Flite Gamer is priced significantly below its primary competitors.

Top Flite Gamer – Compression

a compression chart for the Top Flite Gamer

On our gauge, the Top Flite Gamer averages 77 compression. On compression alone, the comps in the marketplace tend to be urethane-covered balls like the OnCore ELIXR (80) and the Bridgestone Tour B RX (77). Of those we’ve measured to date, the most similar ionomer ball in terms of compression is the Titleist Velocity (78)

Top Flite Gamer – Diameter and Weight

Based on the average diameter of the sample, we classify the Top Flite Gamer as a large ball. Ionomer balls tend to be a bit larger than urethane models so it’s not any surprise that all of the sample met the USGA’s minimum-size standard.

Likewise, none of the balls measured failed to meet our roundness standard. All of the sample were also weight-conforming.

Top Flite Gamer – Inspection

Centeredness and Concentricity

We found multiple issues with respect to concentricity, most specifically with unevenness (extreme thin spots) in the mantle layer and occasionally in the cover. In total, we flagged 25 percent of the sample as “bad.”

Core Consistency

While core color was generally consistent with only a few visible bits of regrind here and there, we did note a few balls with what appeared to be chunks of red material in the core. The most extreme case was flagged as bad. However, the same ball had a significant concentricity defect so it would have been flagged regardless of the core.

an image of the core of the Top Flite Gamer Golf Ball

Cover

Generally speaking, covers on the Top Flite Gamer were excellent. However, we did flag one ball in the sample as bad because a small section of the dimple pattern was effectively missing.

Top Flite Gamer: Consistency

In this section, we detail the consistency of the Top Flite Gamer. Our consistency metrics provide a measure of how similar the balls in our sample were to one another relative to all of the models we’ve tested to date.

Nothing particular stands out about the weight, diameter and compression consistency of the Top Flite Gamer ball. For all of the metrics we track, it falls solidly within the average range.

MyGolfSpy Ball Lab Gauge data for the Top Flite Gamer

Weight Consistency

  • A couple of balls in the second box were perhaps on the light side,but overall consistency was within the average range.

Diameter Consistency

  • Diameter consistency falls within the average range.
  • The USGA minimum diameter is 1.68 inches As you can see from the chart, the Top Flite Gamer errs on the larger side.

Compression Consistency

  • Compression consistency across the sample was within the average range.
  • There was approximately a 10 compression-point spread across the entire sample (not the best, but far from the worst).
  • The compression delta (the compression range across the three points measured on each ball) was generally good, though not as tight as some others.

True Price

True Price is how we quantify the quality of a golf ball. It's a projection of what you'd have to spend to ensure you get 12 good balls.

The True Price will always be equal to or greater than the retail price. The greater the difference between the retail price and the True Price, the more you should be concerned about the quality of the ball.

Top Flite Gamer – Summary

To learn more about our test process, how we define “bad” balls and our True Price metric, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

The Top Flite Gamer isn’t exactly perfect but it’s likely what you should expect at the price point and, with that in mind, we’d rate it as “not bad.”

The Good

  • Solidly average consistency across the board
  • Likely still a bargain at $22.99

The Bad

  • A few too many bad balls in the mix.

Final Grade

The Top Flite Gamer gets an overall score of 65.

While that’s not stellar, it’s within the “average” range and suggests that the Gamer may be plenty good enough for budget-conscious golfers.

For those who liked our previous metric, the “True Price” of the Top Flite Gamer is $31.83. That’s an increase of 38 percent above retail.

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS


Amount

Frequency

For You

For You

News
Apr 22, 2024
Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
Golf Balls
Apr 22, 2024
Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
Golf Technology
Apr 21, 2024
Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Scott

      3 months ago

      i work in the Pro shop, our course can be a beast if you spray the ball but a lamb if you keep it in play. We sell balls starting the high end $58 Doz Pro V, TP5, Chrome Soft, next level down..TM Tour response, Titlist tour soft. and the lower end Callaway super soft & Noodle and the bottom Pinnacle soft 18 pack. When asking about balls my question to them is do you lose more then one ball during a round of golf . If yes, I tell them buy the Pinnacle 18 pack balls for $25 because you’ll lose two on the first hole. The only real difference in balls are if the course has firm greens spin balls are a must if you shoot under 80 ..Pride equals price the higher the pride the more you pay for balls. I can shot 75 playing a Callaway super soft or 82 playing a Pro V.

      Reply

      lefty

      3 years ago

      I play Bridgestone XS and have for awhile. Occasionally I play the Srixon Z-star when it’s cooler which is rare in Florida. I played Titleist for years but just decided to change for the heck of it after I stopped my competitive days about a decade ago. I am going back to Titleist ProV1X because this test confirms Acushnet is making the best quality golf balls. Some will say the difference is not going to make a difference in most golfers shot patterns, I disagree. I play to a 2.0 index at 64 and still hit a 7 iron 160. I will buy the multi-box Titleist deal I can get through my proshop and be done with it.. This article is serious guys, especially to good golfers. You work to hard to try to play the best you can only to have a golf ball mess up your day. The percentages say otherwise but why take the chance.

      Reply

      albatrossx3

      3 years ago

      What has happened to the performance testing you did a couple years ago, that would be nice combined with this, since consistency is great but a crap performer that is consistent is still a crap ball

      Reply

      Steve C

      3 years ago

      How about showing a photo of one of the balls with core concentricity issues. I think that would be more helpful than showing us the color of the core? I assume the attached photo was one showing core color and not concentricity.. One out of four balls with this issue is a lot. How critical do you measure for the ball to be rated having an issue? Thanks.

      Reply

      Eye4golf

      3 years ago

      Living in Alb,NM we play year round and I wanted to try the Gamer during our past winter which gets 35 degrees but not frozen ground. I am a senior golfer with a 9.9 hdcp and this ball passed my test. 86 mph swing and 260 yard drives its as long as my original costco 4 pc and snell black which is my regular balls. The only difference is spin rate with mid to long irons as I hit it high but still doesn’t hold greens well. During our winters here I only use front green yardage or just short due to run out of gamer. Different strokes for different folks. Solid ball, probably not for everyone but works in winter time in sunny Alb.

      Reply

      Luis R

      3 years ago

      Hi Tony. Another great review. As user I have a recommendation: Can the year of the ball be al the end of the name or a separate column? That way when the list continues to grow it’ll easier to compare the same manufacturer balls. Thanks for your consideration.

      Reply

      Ned

      3 years ago

      How about a real ball test that has high, mid, low handicappers actual hit maybe a 5-6 balls all with no markings from all the companies. Then get us actual data on distance spin feel, etc.

      Reply

      Brandon

      3 years ago

      Funny that the Q Star Tour is the worst ball by a mile. I just shot my best round of the year with one of those new Divide balls that’s half red and half yellow.

      Reply

      ChristianR

      3 years ago

      The ball itself is good, the problem is the fabrication quality.
      If you pick a good one is probably the best mid market ball.

      Reply

      El

      3 years ago

      Sorry for the repetition, but the 2021 Q-Star Tour is now made in Japan.

      Hoping that Srixon decided to improve the QC of it (hat-tip to MGS?).
      If so, that ball will be a tremendous value in the 3 piece urethane space.

      Reply

      James Adams

      3 years ago

      So for us hackers, this ball seems suitable. I wouldn’t be upset to lose 5-6 a round and they are still quite capable of being played well.

      Reply

      pineneedlespro

      3 years ago

      Since the GAMER golf ball has the dimple in a dimple cover does it really stay in the air longer??
      That would mean that the ball has a lower “spin decay” while in the air and will carry further. Right!

      Reply

      Ethan

      3 years ago

      Love the ball lab reviews. Was wondering if you could do another smaller name ball like “Cut Golf” with their dual core ball.

      Thanks!

      Reply

      shortside

      3 years ago

      The UK site “Today’s Golfer” did a very interesting test last year. Only a couple of 2 piece balls in the mix but…….

      They performed surprisingly well against much more expensive urethane cover balls. The belief that they’re rocks that just fly forever and don’t spin was proven to be a bit untrue to put it mildly.

      I’d really like to see MGS take a deep dive into that market segment. 2 & 3 piece. The ionomer covers are more durable. So theoretically if it’s kept in play they should last longer which would increase their value.

      Of course with all of that said Maxfli Tour or Vice balls can be had on sale or in 5 dozen purchases for a comparable price. So why spend your money on a less accurate ball? Well……

      Simply put most golfers score in mid 90’s to 100+ while hitting a driver around 200 yards. And many of those run into a sporting goods store looking for the “best” cheap ball they can find. I know it’s not sexy but the top balls under $20 a dozen would be interesting.

      A similar test for $300 and under complete club sets would be interesting too. From what I’ve seen on YouTube they’ve come a long ways from the day I day I walked into a Kmart and left with a set of Northwestern persimmon woods and blade irons………Those rascals bit ya on every miss hit.

      Reason being with the record number of first rounds in 2020 it would be nice to have affordable recommendations for friends and family just getting into or returning to the game.

      Reply

      Mike

      3 years ago

      You make some great points. I have found thousands of premium balls over the past few years & can surely bet that most weren’t lost by single digit handicappers! I know plenty of people who when they started, spent money on Pro v1’s then, maybe cuz they had money to burn. Yet they would have been better off spending that money on lessons.

      Reply

      Keith

      2 years ago

      You are correct. I am a single digit, and play a lot, and also in tournaments. I can count on one hand the number of lost balls the last couple of years. You don’t get a single digit by losing balls.

      lefty

      3 years ago

      Nick Price won a major with the Bridgestone Extra Spin, a two piece ball they no longer make.

      Reply

      Cigarsmoker

      3 years ago

      Enjoyed the article and look forward to seeing Callaway SuperHot and SuperHot 55 tested.

      Reply

      Foz

      3 years ago

      Thanks for including the Gamer in your ball lab. Awhile back I purchased 4 dozen using the My Golf Spy 40% discount. I must say they travel very similar to a Pro V1, distance and stopping. I have been very pleased with these.

      Reply

      bob

      3 years ago

      I bought two boxes of Gamers last year for $34 after reading a review. Just fun to try them and see if these really are a great deal on price for a pretty good ball. A little funny sounding off of the irons but nothing offensive. I don’t think they are as long off the driver or irons as a Pro-V, Z Star, Bridgestone but they are fine. That ball chart ranking above…….those Pinnacle Range balls are looking better and better as the data piles up.

      Reply

      Danny

      3 years ago

      Time for you all to get the AVX cut and spec’d to round out the Titliest top tier balls Tony.

      Reply

      Vinal Torrey

      3 years ago

      The AVX ball feels like a marshmallow off the driver and doesn’t go anywhere. I am very disappointed in Titleist putting such a piece of crap on the market. Any ball on the market would outdistance it without a doubt!

      Reply

      Jack

      3 years ago

      I’m surprised to read this about the AVX. I have read that it is soft feeling but not that it doesn’t go anywhere.

      Mike

      3 years ago

      Can’t say I was that harsh on them, but after a few tries, I sold off whatever ones I had. Just didn’t work for me

      Surfngolf

      3 years ago

      I take issue with your appraisal of the AVX, and I’m sure there are quite a few golfers who would also disagree with you, and further, an entire group of engineers, designers, and marketing people at Titleist who would also find your opinion less than accurate.. And, if they were of such poor quality, they likely wouldn’t have been sold for more than one or two seasons, because Titleist would have discontinued them if they weren’t a successful product.

      I like playing the AVX. I find it to be a great ball to play on windy days, because it flies lower and spins less on drives—no ballooning—the height isn’t dramatic to the V1 orV1x, but it’s noticeably different. Even on non-windy days, they fly as far, even farther than the ProV1 and V1x for me that is—again, not a massive difference, but a few yards definitely. They are fantastic around the greens, again comparable to either of the V1s and they hold the greens superbly on approach shots. I can’t say the same for the less than premium balls. I have heard some people say they didn’t feel the AVX held the greens, but that has not been my experience, but my iron spin rates are on the high side, and my ball flight is naturally high too, and I generally play on fairly receptive greens.

      I play the yellow AVX almost exclusively when the skies turn gray and temperature drops into the 50s and below. I will play the V1x on less windy days, and just started experimenting with the V1x left dash—completely different experience than the AVX, not quite the antithesis, but in terms of feeling it is much harder, harder than even the V1x—once I got used to the incredibly firm feeling of the left dash off of the driver, I was able to appreciate it’s differences.

      I don’t know why you would say that Titleist made a poorly conceived and executed ball—that’s just not an accurate assessment—Titleist just doesn’t put out junk—they are way to savvy, financially and performance based to do that. I was sent a couple sleeves of AVXs as a tester before they were released to the public and played them with a critical mind, but just couldn’t fault them in any category. They were much softer than the V1x and V1s that I was used to playing, but their performance was superior to any less than premium ball, and certainly competitive with other premium balls from different manufacturers.

      I play to a +3 HCP, with a medium swing speed (100 mph Driver), and I certainly find some balls and golf equipment not to my liking, but I don’t just trash the manufacturer or the product, just because they don’t suit my game. Like these Top Flite Gamers, I know who they’re designed for and who their target market is, and most people who are buying them are not likely playing in the single digits. Likewise, you won’t find me hitting any of the Gamers, because I would likely find myself struggling on certain shots with them. Titleist found a market share that wanted a softer premium ball, my guess is to compete with the Callaway Chrome Soft that had successfully hit the market just before the AVX was released. I didn’t have the best experience with the Chrome Soft, but I sure didn’t trash them. I did find the AVX to suit my game—and at my age (mid 60s—playing in my 35th year), I liked that they were producing a premium ball in the high vis yellow so that I could follow them down the fairway, and onto the greens.

      I, too, would like to see the AVX in the next round of testing.

      Dave Vardon

      3 years ago

      Actually surprised at the rating, as I had played an earlier version of these (3 years ago ?) and they had performed well. But that’s good to know. Still, for the price as you say, not that bad, lol

      Reply

      DJ Mico

      3 years ago

      As a MGS tester of the Gamer, I am in agreement with everything Tony has said about the ball. While I didn’t analyze things like weight or cut them open, our conclusions of the ball are the same: a solidly average ball at a great price, but not the best.

      Of note, from playing the Gamer, the ball plays significantly firmer than the compression indicates. Having played the OnCore Elixir also, the cover makes a HUGE difference in terms of feel. With the ionomer cover on the Gamer, the ball feels very firm and verging on hard off the cover, but you can feel the core is softer. With the Elixir, the ball feels really soft from the urethane cover then a little firmer feeling from the core.

      Great work as always, Tony!

      Reply

      Mike

      3 years ago

      Given it now has an isonomer cover, this ball sinks back into the realm of the two-piece offerings of the OEMs. The old Gamers were great values with the urathene cover but these are just balls that w/b played by a price conscious golfer. And there’s nothing wrong with that. Cuz I’ve learned over the past few years, a lot of folks just want to go on a course and have fun, not worry about score, couldn’t care less about launch angle and spin rates etc.

      Reply

      Glen K

      3 years ago

      The Gamer is a 3 piece and definitely is a lot more versatile then any 2 pieces on the market.

      Reply

      Mike

      3 years ago

      Agreed. That’s why I think it’s a much better choice for price conscious mid-handicappers & up then your plain old two-piece balls.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 22, 2024
    Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
    Golf Balls
    Apr 22, 2024
    Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
    Golf Technology
    Apr 21, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.