Hi team,

I bought the Inesis 900 solely based on the results of this test. I have now gone through two of them, both have halted reading distance entirely. Not sure how long you tested these for, but the 1st one I received lasted me 4 rounds before being faulty, the 2nd one lasted about 6 rounds. I have replaced batteries, tinkered with the optics, everything I know to do, and they have both stopped working. Decathlon has been kind enough to provide replacements, but I had expected an entirely different experience after reading this review and using it to inform my purchasing decision. Disappointing to say the least! Thought you guys should know.

Best,
Jack

Hey,

I am in search of a golf rangefinder without slope (to meet PAT regulations), for under $120. I’ve seen Boblov and Zinn Optics. Any suggestions or information regarding the qualify of these two?

Here’s my concern:

A 400-yard range is claimed for the NX7. Perhaps that is true — to pins that are fitted with retro reflectors. However, to the question, “Can it measure distance to other things …,” posted at another web site, a user responded, “Mine has trouble when the crosshairs are not on a flag or further out beyond 200 yards.” Well, that’s a long way from 400 yards.

On most courses that I play, the flagsticks are not fitted with retro reflectors.

I need to be able to determine lay-up distances reliably. That means, I would need a laser range finder that I can depend on to give me accurate readings to non-reflector pins out to a distance equal to my driver plus my favorite layup club — EVERY TIME. For me, that’s 275+125 = 400 yards.

I’ve tried five different brands of laser range finders under $200. None of them was able to do that. About once or twice a round, each gave me a reading that turned out to be 1-2 clubs short or long. Recovering from such errors typically costs me strokes — usually one but often two. That’s not acceptable to me.

I’m back to using a GPS rangefinder. But I keep hoping that a brand will come along that can do what I need.

Hopefully, MyGolfSpy will find a way to determine and report the longest DEPENDABLE ranges for future laser rangefinder buying guides.

So, MGS, I have a question regarding rangefinders. From a visual standpoint, it seems like there are only a few baseline models (the shape of the rangefinder appears to be the same across some brands/models). For example, if you look at the Bushnell Tour V4 and the Precision Pro NX7, the shape of the body is the same, and the lenses/lasers at the front are identical. Is it the case then, that several of these rangefinders are manufactured by the same company, and all they do is slap on a different shell? If that is the case, would the only differentiating factor be the software inside?

Maybe this is a silly question to ask here since the review suggests the demand exists… but why buy a rangefinder? There are some really good apps that provide distance and maps but with the added benefit of keeping strokes and all that stuff. I know rangefinders will do the elevation/weather thing- is that the benefit? I just feel like maybe I’m missing something somehow, since the apps are so much cheaper. Thanks!

I am little surprised with how the precision nx9 HD performed in the testing – based on the results it looks like it is a downgrade from the nx7 and nx7 pro but carrying a higher price tag. I have the nx7 pro and love it, and I was pretty excited when I read the April MGS article about the nx9 coming out and the improvements it sound it was going to make. For example, the article talked about improved optics and faster processing (“processes and displays information twice as fast as the NX 7 pro”) but the test results above show that wasn’t the case. Would be interested in getting some further insight on why it looks like the improvements weren’t realized, since I like the company goal, the product I have, and was interested in potentially trading in and up, but based on the test results I would be trading up for a built in magnet in the unit without any real performance differences.

I noticed that no Leupolds were included. Were all their models so bad they didn’t even make the list or were they not tested for some reason?

I’d like to see a critical review of hybrid rangefinders. I sold my Garmin z80 because it was slow and wouldn’t lock on well when there are trees behind green. Your info about the Z80 looks more like an add than a review. Bushnell hybrid does not do slope. I’d like to see what you think of the SL1 from Voice Caddie. It locks on fast and marries gps & laser well & it does slope. The z80 battery life was not so great.

Caddy Tek V2 w/slope & jolt is the new version; work fine. Comes w/battery & additional side door, to disable slope – for under $140, Would have been interested to see how it placed…

I agree, tried and had Nexus Pro as well. Rate from shooting to distance return rate is slow. Went back to trust Bushnell V3, which I had.

Been using the Nikon Coolshot 40i w/slope for three seasons and really like it. I do wish it had the stabilizer, especially in windy conditions, but it is a great tool and their lenses are the best. Whatever you buy, be sure it has slope!

Did I miss where we could see the actual test results? It would be nice to see the actual data to determine if the price difference between 2 models is worth the cost difference. For example, is there really that much of a difference in accuracy? Or is the “Accuracy” ranking more a measure of consistency?

If I understand Rule 14.3 right, you can’t use a device that calculates slope or any additional weather-related data in tournaments OR in any round that you post for a handicap. Doesn’t this second stipulation basically make these features useless outside of the driving range or strictly practice holes?

Still use my very old Callaway RAZR every round and grab the distance faster that most others with Bushnells. Especially the Tour V4 Shift. With the slope turned on, they have a hard time getting distances unless the flag has reflectors. Especially if there are trees directly behind it. My Callaway locks right on. Not just one person having the Tour 4V Shift problem either. Every one of my buddies that have it are seeing the problem.

Based on the fact that optics are better and additional features would be less of a selling point for most golfers, I think the Precision NX7 is a better value than the Inesis 900. It’s certainly a close call between the two though.

Just wanna say the NX7 Pro Slope is an awesome product for the price! I was never going to be able to justify the price tags on the top of the line models. It’s nice to see the NX7 finished in a decent spot.

How about an additional ranking using just the basic components without features (Accuracy, Speed, Optics, Display) for those of us who don’t need the extras?

For most of my rounds I use a GPS. I don’t need exact yardages, I’m not that good. I have a Bushnell Tour V3 that has worked very well for several years, but my wife uses it most of the time. When we play together, she is always asking me how far it is to the front of the green. If I ever have to replace the Tour V3, it will be one that has GPS too.

I’m puzzled that the CaddyTek V2 sold at Costco wasn’t tested. At $129 with overwhelmingly positive reviews it seems like a winner. I believe I’ve also seen it as a store brand at a national retailer.

My TecTecTec is still going strong in year 3. Replaced the battery once.

Give me distance, durability and a good warranty. I would suggest that you go to a physical store and HANDLE the rangefinder and decide which one feels like it can handle being dropped on a concrete cart path numerous times. Which ones have manufacturing standards that are based in durability and reliability. A couple of these listed feel like cheap Chinese junk (they all are probably made in China). They might give you yardage, but their housings seem to be the weak point which I think is important. I had the battery compartment latch break off one of those…not from dropping. I now this is not a life/death issue like is needed in other circumstances (golf is just a game) but I like things that work for a long time even if given to a 10 year old.

No Leupold? They didn’t want to particpate?

why no leupold?

This is Great, I am in the market for a rangefinder .. think I might go with the Inesis 900

I have the MGS600S. I’ve had it about a year. I’ve compared it to all my friend’s expensive rangefinders and it is consistently 1 -2 yards long. Which for my game(and virtually anyone reading this) is accurate enough. For just over $100 it’s the best value of any rangefinder on this list. Also, something not mentioned here is battery life. It’s been a year and no sign of the battery slowing down. I play an average of 2-3 times a week. Save a couple hundred bucks.

So, not bad findings, but here’s my thing with this test… I’m using a “Breaking 80 IS500R” range finder in the bag at the moment. It’s working extremely well and it set me back less than $100 – refurbished units on eBay are under $60 most of the time. While I can appreciate the extra features that $300-400 gets me, honestly, I don’t NEED most of them. I also don’t use a slope feature as that isn’t legal for tournament or posting rounds, so it’s an added feature that isn’t needed for me.

I would love to see a battle of the off brands instead of going with the usual suspects. You have a ton of laser rangefinders out there that are a stellar value, depending on the needs of the user.

Overall, GREAT STUFF here though! Keep up the great work!

I’ll need to give that Inesis a shot. I have the Nexus Pro and my only complaint is that it’s slow compared to all other range finders I’ve used.