CEO For a Day – TaylorMade
News

CEO For a Day – TaylorMade

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

CEO For a Day – TaylorMade

Written By: Tony Covey

TaylorMade’s new CEO Ben Sharpe has his hands full. His might be the fullest hands in golf. And his feet…with former CEO Mark King off to adidas North America, Mr. Sharpe has some pretty big shoes to fill as well. It’s a safe bet that the new boss is having little trouble staying busy. His company is in need of a bit of restoration.

While it’s absolutely a stretch to say that the ship is sinking, the SS TaylorMade has taken on some water over the last few months. The company is now working to plug the holes. Fixing the ship is part of Mr. Sharpe’s job right now, which certainly explains why TaylorMade has been, metaphorically speaking, in dry dock, for the last couple of months or so.

I’m done with the boat analogies.

Even as its main competitor (Callaway) has announced new product (and I promise you there’s lots more to come), TaylorMade has remained quiet. By now we should be talking about the next SLDR driver and the next SpeedBlade iron.

Instead, it’s barely updated putters, a driving iron, and more doom and gloom than is probably warranted.

It is a time of great restraint at TaylorMade, and while only the deepest of insiders know for sure, I would imagine that right now is when the new business strategy is being prepped and polished for deployment.

Whether that’s simply a recharge, a reinvigoration, or a total reinvention of the brand remains to be seen. I suspect that Ben Sharpe is taking a very close look at the existing executive team and deciding which of the holdovers from the Mark King era fit within his vision.

TaylorMade must recalibrate.

The Obstacles

Let’s take a look at some of the problems TaylorMade currently faces.

Too Much Gear: Over-saturation, excess inventory, a flooded channel, whatever you want to call it, there’s too much in the way of old product on store shelves right now. This isn’t news.

Conservatively TaylorMade is 10 driver models deep on store shelves right now, and that’s a problem.

Golfers Don’t Trust TaylorMade: Some consumers have lost faith in TaylorMade. Most right-minded don’t doubt the quality, but in a tight economy, how do you justify spending big money today, when history has shown time and time again, that simply waiting a few weeks can save you $50-$100?

Most of us believe that given enough time TaylorMade will slash prices, offer up an alternative (430), give us a new color option (R1 Black/SLDR White), or simply bring out a new model (JetSpeed/SLDR S).

TaylorMade has conditioned the consumer wait for something newer, better, different, or at least cheaper, and that’s a problem.

Retailers are Pissed Off: With frequent, early, and aggressive price drops coupled with policies like the now notorious Net Down, minimum order incentives, and demands over the allocation of floor space; as the #1 company in golf, TaylorMade gained a reputation for being heavy-handed with retailers, particularly smaller accounts.

Many of those guys are tired of being bullied. Retailers are angry, and quite frankly more than a couple are enjoying watching TaylorMade get its comeuppance.

The guys selling you gear are fed up with the heavy-handed approach and diminishing margins on TaylorMade sales. There’s a small rebellion of sorts, and that’s a problem.

Dick’s Problem is TaylorMade’s Problem: By now the struggles at Dick’s Sporting Goods are well-known. The company was TaylorMade’s biggest customer. Estimates say 60% of the company’s current inventory is TaylorMade, and it’s not selling like it used to.

As a result of the decline in their golf equipment business, Dick’s (TaylorMade’s #1 source of revenue) is scaling back their golf business in a big way. That too is a problem for TaylorMade.

Cost Cuts are Necessary: Finally, after several less than stellar financial results for the last several quarters, TaylorMade’s parent company, adidas, has drawn a line in the sand. TaylorMade’s costs need to be cut to the tune of $65-$80 million bucks.

Closing down Adams HQ in Plano, and laying off a couple hundred people is an unfortunate start, but it’s not nearly enough.

More money will need to come off the books, and that’s a problem for TaylorMade.

There are some Positives

Like most anything else, it’s not all bad. There are actually some real positives that TaylorMade can take from 2014.

Ignore the financials and step away from the negativity for a moment…it’s actually been a banner year for TaylorMade products.

SLDR is a fantastic driver. SpeedBlade is as good as it gets in the game-improvement space, and the SLDR iron is the company’s best in years. The new golf balls are excellent. Mini Driver has been a personal revelation, and the Tour Preferred wedge is solid (and let’s be honest, TaylorMade’s wedges haven’t been solid for a while now).

Even the super-niche UDI gained a bit more traction that I expected.

And as long as I’m being honest, while JetSpeed was an almost total debacle, I’m actually impressed by the decisiveness with which the company pulled the plug on it. Scrap it and don’t look back.

I also applaud the company for moving away from the campiness of RocketBallz and JetSpeed (even if they were fun), and taking a more straight-faced approach to the business while reinvigorating the previously neglected Tour Preferred franchise. Think what you will about the marketing, but TaylorMade has always been serious about golf. Speed Police notwithstanding, for a good part of 2014 they’ve acted like it.

It can build off that too.

So What Would You Do?

Put yourself in Ben Sharpe’s shoes for 24 hours. Obviously that’s not enough time to execute a comprehensive change in strategy (if it is, these CEOs really are grossly overpaid), but given the helm of TaylorMade golf for a single day, what one single change would you make to help put the company back on the right track?

For You

For You

Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
Buyer's Guides
Apr 12, 2024
Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
First Look
Apr 12, 2024
Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
News
Apr 12, 2024
PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Steve Aisbett

      10 years ago

      Totally agree with your comments there needs to be a total culture change within the entire organization as well as longer life for all products a driver each year and irons lasting 18 months.

      Reply

      golfpro

      10 years ago

      2 year product cycles! Titleist has it right…release irons and woods in opposite years to keep it fresh! Let the customer enjoy his jetspeed before you tell him its inferior. Let the retailer move the club without having to give it away for next to nothing! Net downs are an evil (and genius?) way of getting the retailer to purchase more stock then they intended to or budgeted for. They have gained a lot of market share but consumer confidence and happiness is falling!

      Reply

      Lou

      10 years ago

      I would keep pushing innovation but with REAL results. Whether people like Taylormade or not, you cannot deny that they make great equipment as well as the Callaway’s, Ping’s, Titleist etc…

      I was a huge fan of Cobra when I started out. I even bought the Cobra ZL Driver that I loved very much but after 1 season I noticed I had lost a lot of distance and couldn’t figure out why. I went to a range and I normally carry 250 and I could only carry 205. The pro there told me that they (Cobra drivers) had a reputation of face dying on people and that’s where the loss in distance was. I threw it out and bought a Rocketballz which my older bro is using and it still performs as well as it did the day I bought it.

      Tmag shot themselves in the foot with all the “distance gains” marketing but seriously, what are most average golfers looking for – distance! You can’t expect them to put out new equipment and say “Hey, buy our new irons, they go about the same as the other ones” lol

      and YES I can hear you guys say “than they shouldn’t put anything out then” and you are 99% correct (the 1% being that they are a company and companies need to make money period).

      It comes down to the model as a whole and I’m not talking about just golf. Economies period. How much money is too much! There are people in the world that could buy everything on the planet 3 times and they still want more. Things need to change if we are to move forward

      Reply

      O. Jones

      10 years ago

      Resign. Seek employment in Solar Power, Sharing Economy or Affordable On-line Education. It will take years to clean up this mess….

      Reply

      Golfer Burnz

      10 years ago

      Assemble a Taylormade Reclamation Team to buy up all golf clubs manufactured before 2010, and disassemble, grind, melt down and recycle all materials into new technologically advanced golf clubs. Similar to the gun buy back program. Too many people get by playing older golf equipment.

      Reply

      ericb

      10 years ago

      Author,

      As a spy, how do you explain all the finger pointing you do in this article? Pointing fingers is not a spy’s job.

      This article fails the entire MGS mission statement. A spy’s mission is to bring to light new information. Analysts unravel the web of info. That’s our job- the readers.

      A spy has no business criticizing anything. The job is to present info. Given that MGS is media, I respect the objective to start a dialogue. However, this author in this case has blurred the line between spy and analyst with statements like these: “Sharpe has his hands full” “golfers don’t trust TM” “retailers are pissed off.” Following that error, the stage for dialogue is improperly set.

      Beware of how you’re bashing TM because you risk driving people away from the game. You risk driving away quality readers and donors by moving away from the core mission of MGS. As an author here, stick to the job of bringing forth new information.

      As a spy, if you’re going to speculate about anything, speculate about technology. The finger-pointing in this article will come back to bite you in the ass if TaylorMade is able to pull off another reorganization. And, in that event, the spy who presented the naked facts would be a hero for naming the key players and important events along the way.

      Bettering spies and bettering analysis,

      ericb

      Reply

      Nathan

      10 years ago

      Number 1: Bring back the vintage club section to taylormade’s website!!!
      When you removed this, you lost your way.
      It is odd that when you took the focus away from your past, you lost sight of your future.
      Still this is what has happened.
      Embrace who you were, know who you are and at the same time know where you want to go.
      Golf is not about profit and loss, yes its important, but too much focus on this and you will fall as you have. Bring back ALL your vintage specs, offer customers anything taylormade, be it 10-15 years old, do not demand they buy the latest and greatest. You will be a better company for this.
      Make available online sales in more countrys than just the US, new and second hand.
      Moving foward taylormade will embrace its past whilst focusing on the future.
      You cant have one without the other.
      Now seriously why on earth are you asking the people what to do, you have a ceo who gets paid millions.
      Wheres my cut

      Reply

      Nathan

      10 years ago

      Oh and also keep aftermarket shafts just that, graphics intact… as you did for what, a whole two months!!!

      Reply

      RON

      10 years ago

      Why to people push this get fit fr clubs BS YES YOU NEED A CERTAIN FLEX SHAFT FOR YR GAME AND LIE ANGLE AND LENGTH I UNDERSTAND THAT BUT THATS WHERE IT ENDS AND YOU SHOULDF KNOW YOUR FLEX LIE ANGLE BY NOW, WHATS THE POINT IN GETTING FIT FOR OTHER THAN THAT WHICH YOU REALLY DONT NEED TO GET FIT FOR YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT FROM TRIAL AND ERROR. A pro who did these fittings with the machine and all said its all BS and a money making scheme and thats all it is. You gys accually think being fit is gong to make you a better player well its NOT so save your 100 bucks fr a fitting he also mentioned he played with a club that wasnt close to his specs and still shot under par, he played no different. Im not saying shaft flex and lie angle isnt important but going through a totall fitting is a waste of money, If you dont have a good swing being ”FITTED” as you call it wont make you play better 1 iota, everytime I here get fit I LAUGH MY ASS OFF. Thats just hackers trying to find an excuse to find a good game .

      Reply

      AJ

      10 years ago

      Why is there a belief that the management shuffle at Adidas / TM is for anything other than a business (Adidas that is) has promoted one their most successful CEO’s to the position of president in Nth America.
      Mr King since 2003 has revolutionised TM and increased total turn over and profitability by a substantial amount.
      I think you all have your head in the sand (read: up your %^&*) and believe that the corporate giant will continue to forge ahead with it’s successful to date strategy. Idiots will still buy a complete new set of clubs every year because they can and justify it with some BS that makes them feel good about it regardless.
      If these clowns actually took heed of the advice in every second article or review on MGS and took the time to get properly fitted for their clubs then TM would truly be out of business as they would only need a new set every 5 to 10 years because they wore the face out.
      Will TM change it’s strategy: NO
      Will some other greedy retailer get sucked into holding too much stock (Dicks): YES
      Will MGS keep pushing the GET FIT message: YES
      Will 99% of you get fit: NO
      Will 99% of you still buy new clubs just because there is a new one: YES

      Reply

      Bill

      10 years ago

      Sell the company to Trump so it can go private. Then Taylormade can stop pandering to stockholders with terrible business decisions that alienate both their user base and their dealer network.

      Reply

      Jeff

      10 years ago

      All the comments and suggestions are very interesting reads….my question to the vast majority of those who are placing comments would be: why all the references to copying the Titleist/Ping model for product releases, advertisements, marketing strategies, etc….

      At the end of the day TM is a business and they are going to outsell Titleist plus Ping according to the numbers many of the previous commentators have provided during there “down year”. As serious golfers, of course you would want things to be of the highest quality with larger technology jumps from driver to driver , iron to iron etc… that comes along with a slower price cycle.

      The thing you must consider is, if you owned a large supermarket grocery store in town with a rival local market specializing in organic foods and a rival deli/market with high quality meats, and you outsold those business in revenue and were also more profitable than both added together, why would you change and copy there models. Its just an example using another business category but if you were the CEO or owner, is that a decision you would make in that business, if not why would you make that decision in golf. The majority of the comments left in this section are made by golfers for golfers purposes , not golfers for business purposes

      Reply

      RON

      10 years ago

      Regis I agree 100 percent that a lot of the shafts look identical to the real deal and their not I always knew that and thats one thing that always burned me up inside, Titleist does this a lot and I know that the shafts that say ping on em ae not the same either but its the proprietory shafts these companies put in the drivers are still WAY more quality than TMs proprietory shafts or if you want to call them shafts but you can get real deal shafts from these other companies with hardly any up charge all, but with TM to ask for a decent quality shaft from them is like going to a golf store and paying top dollar for the entire shaft full price where these other companies only up charge you maybe 75 bucks for an exotic shaft. When you take apart a TM made for the walls are paper thin on the shaft . For 400 a driver thats sinful. Their iron forgings are the cheapest in the business and always were, Their 1995 bubble shaft was a marketing joke which did nothing fr their drivers This company isnt Taylormade anymore its Addidas trying to run a golf company.

      Reply

      Phil

      10 years ago

      As CEO i would look for cost savings and a replacement for Dicks while looking at secondary markets for outdated inventory – 1.5 billion is a lot and growth is demanded regardless.

      As a retailer who stocks TM on a showroom basis i(green glass) actually have no complaints but the big box guys must be frustrated as h…

      Reply

      Regis

      10 years ago

      Ron
      I’m not defending TMAG. On the contrary my original suggestion relevant to the topic of the post was to create a model more like Titleist where they market a club with a decent made for stock shaft and then offer upgrades to real deal shafts. I’ve owned Ping, Titleist, Adams, Tour Edge (Newsflash that Graphite Design shaft is a made for) , Cobra , Nike (with the Kura Kage)and other drivers and fairways. But a lot of people are fooled into thinking they are getting a real deal shaft simply because the manufacturer puts a recognizable name on them . By the way, The OEM Ping G25 shaft is available at Golf Anything for $29.95. and comes with a Ping grip. (same price as the TMAG OEM shaft for the SLDR)
      The Titleist 913 driver is now available for $299 but to get a Graphite design shaft upgrade is PLUS $279 ! ( Which is exactly what I was suggesting in my original post) But it is NOT at “no upcharge” as you suggest.
      I do my own club work and I know the difference between a made for shaft and a true aftermarket shaft. Titleist used to sell a driver with a Mitsubishi Rayon Bassara shaft that looked exactly like the aftermarket model. The stock shaft was a great, great, stock shaft but a real Bassara shaft is $300 and the posted weight on the stock shaft and the CPM rating on the SKU under the grip don’t match the specs for the real deal Bassara. Still a great stock shaft but I knew I was buying a Titleist Bassara.
      A lot of the manufacturer shafts (even their upgrades) are made to the same general specs ( for example with Misubishi Rayon) but not made in their factory in Japan. So if you can buy a $300 driver with an upgraded shaft for $50 (where that aftermarket shaft alone sells for $325) ask yourself who’s “being a sucker”.

      Reply

      AWOL

      10 years ago

      Maybe you two or others can clarify something for me. I actually like that the prices have stayed relatively stable for years. Now i have heard both arguments that the drivers should be more and others say they should be cheaper. So this is my interpretation of costs and i will compare it to electronics. When plasma tvs first came out i bought one 50″ at the tune of $3k now as technology advances the price has came down. I can now get a 50″ plasma with better refresh rates and more HDMI ports than my old one for about $2k cheaper. Since technology has not really advanced much in drivers and golf equipment in general. Shouldn’t that mean drivers and clubs should be cheaper. If i were to base off of inflation in general then yeah clubs should be more. But since the industry advancements have been stagnant it would make sense that either the prices stay the same since it is all regulated and can go only so far in advancements or the prices should come down because they have improved the manufacturing process.

      Reply

      Regis

      10 years ago

      My only point is that if consumers want a 2 year cycle out of Taylor Made and assuming the technology in heads is at a standstill, Start offering better shaft options (and I mean options-Many golfers are totally satisfied with stock shafts). But there’s a misconception that manufacturers have been jacking up prices and that’s not the case. From the February ,2007 Golf Digest Hot List:
      Callaway Fusion FT 5- $430
      Cobra AS9-$400
      Nike SQ Sumo-$400
      Ping G5-$300
      Ping Rapture-$430
      Taylor Made R7 Super Quad $400
      Now that’s 7 and arguably 8 model years ago. The purpose of the Blog was to speculate what I would do if I were CEO of TMAG. I personally think the SLDR line is the best TMAG has offered. Everybody seems to agree that we don’t need the market flooded with new heads. So my thought was upgrade your shaft options in all flexes not just in stiff and extra stiff, give those shafts to the retailer and let the consumer feed his addiction by adding or upgrading a shaft (with adaptor) after the original purchase and for the new buyer keep the price where it is with a stock shaft but let the golfer who goes to Golfsmith for example to hit a SLDR the option of an on site upgrade.

      AWOL

      10 years ago

      I know Regis im on the same page as you. It just seemed that everybody has been bringing up costs a lot lately. Ron seems personally offended by manufacturers. I even recall MGS saying that drivers should be more expensive. I ask why? They are selling you the same tech for 10 yrs now. COR limits reached, MOI about as high as you can get. Can you imagine paying $3k for a plasma 10 yrs ago, based on inflation now that same TV should be $10k (im exaggerating a little). So costs should come down or stay the same if technology has reached its capacity. Having said that to get back on track separate heads and shaft upgrades that you and I both mentioned as well as others i think is a great idea.

      RON

      10 years ago

      A bunch of companies put in good shafts ADAMS always gives you top line shafts and only charge 300 fr the whole shabang as well as PING, Titleist made for shafts are much better quality than TMs made for plus with Titleist you can order a nice aldilla or graphite design with no upcharge. Then theres Callaway ,got my CALLAWAY iMAX WITH A REAL DIAMANA blueBOARD with it with just a 50 dollar up charge plus I could have got a Fubuki with no up charge with that cally driver. Now Nike gives you a real KURI KAGE with their drivers so Regis dont tell me these other companies are no different, people like you who buy a TM driver fr that kind of money with their 10 dollar reject shaft is the reason why they upcharge you 200 dollars more on top of the 400 dollar price cuzz they can get it from you , thats just being a sucker for their tour player advertisements. Any company that takes people to the coals like that why would you defend them, thats what I dont understand. TM could give a sheet less abt you.

      Reply

      MT

      10 years ago

      It’s REAL simple .. saturation in ANYTHING is bad.

      Reply

      Peter Ciambrone

      10 years ago

      You guys basically said it best, the problems you list above are it, I used to be a loyal TMAG guy, but once they started giving me buyers remorse I moved on, no trust for me in a company that continuously comes out with so many products, though I have started to come around and have the SLDR driver and Ghost blade Daytona putter, I love them both, and it’s solely because of MyGolfSpy and thier most wanted lists.
      So, Dear Ben Sharp, be a leading golf manufacturer not a marketing company who are constantly releasing new clubs and insist in more yardage than the club you released 2 months ago, make me trust in your company again and stop with all the hype, if you invest in great R&D we will find out about it for sure, thus probably saving a ton on all the marketing mubojumbo. here’s a good principle to live by….K.I.S.S

      copied from Wikipedia:
      KISS is an acronym for “Keep it simple, stupid” as a design principle noted by the U.S. Navy in 1960.[1][2] The KISS principle states that most systems work best if they are kept simple rather than made complicated; therefore simplicity should be a key goal in design and unnecessary
      complexity should be avoided. The phrase has been associated with aircraft engineer Kelly Johnson (1910–1990).[3] The term “KISS principle” was in popular use by 1970.[4] Variations on the phrase include “keep it short and simple” and “keep it simple and straightforward”.[5][6]

      Reply

      RON

      10 years ago

      Regis why should they have to charge extra for a driver just because they put in a quality shaft other companies dont do it , what makes TM so different that they would have to charge extra for a decent shaft, the fact that they charge 400 bucks for a stupid driver means it would HAVE to come with a quality shaft because the shaft is everything in a driver not the head. Those TM driver heads dont cost shit to make. Even if they put a 150 dollar Aldila shaft in them your still getting riptoff, you think 400 bucks is nothing for a lousy driver come on wake up.

      Reply

      Regis

      10 years ago

      Other companies do not have a significantly better stock shaft regardless of what name they put on it so I don’t know what information you are relying upon.. Lets say the market price for a new driver is $400. Its been at that level for 15 years. Lets also assume that a decent shaft upgrade goes for $60 (eg: an UST Mamaya V2) next level is $125 ( eg: a Matrix Radix) then $175 (Oban Devotion) Please understand I am just throwing these out for illustration. Do you expect TMAG or any other manufacturer to throw these in without an upcharge? If you think a current day price of $400 for a new driver with a quality shaft is a rip off, I don’t need to wake up, you need to go back to sleep Rip Van Winkle.

      Reply

      DL Moore

      10 years ago

      Bring back the TP Shield and product lines. The 510TP and R7425TP are still among the best stuff ever made in golf. TM just abandoned the TP shield—-odd.

      I would also re-tool along the lines of Titleist. I just switched 90% of my bag back to Titleist (irons, wedges, putter, FW) for no reason other than their stuff is great (as is TM) but I don’t have post purchase regret 2-3 weeks later.

      Reply

      Fraser B

      10 years ago

      Taylormade has to now in my opinion find an identity if it is going to survive as one of the top 4 in golf. To do this I think they would have to make some drastic changes and that would mean gettign rid of excess fat and gettign in some true talent. I would do it this way.
      1- Anyone and I mean anyone who had a hand in the developing and implementing of the current TM model should go. If they got it so bad the first time the won’t get it right a second.
      2- Choose 2 club models and run them as your flagship models in each handicap range.
      – Woods and Irons in tour, low to mid and mid to high.
      3- You have Tour players – USE THEM and their opions like Mizuno does with Luke. They hit your clubs for a living and will happily tell what works and what doesn’t. Also buying a set of clubs that have actually been designed with the help of Sergio, Jason and Dustin will give you free marketing.
      4- No more stupid names or adverts and no more daft product cycles.
      5 – Get in some real talent to design the wedge line and putter line.
      6- Offer real shafts in woods and irons, offer a comprehensive list of custom fit options at a reasonable charge if needed and do not change the adapters on woods. So what if I am using an R11 now, I might like the slider but the shaft in my R11 is perfect but doesn’t fit. MMMM I’m sticking with the R11.
      7- Don’t be cheap! All that R&D into a great wood head and then you piss it away with a shitty shaft
      8- Get out of the ball business unless your going to focus on one solid premiuim ball.
      9- If your going to forge an iron make sure its a quality forging to rival Mizuno.
      10 – Offer one of a kind customisations like the white paint and crazy decals free with a purchase.

      Leave Adams alone! They make good stuff and a lot of it better that TM. Let them do their own thing, don’t try to hijack the technology, rather learn from it, improve it and put it into the TM product. Keep the two companies seperate but ensure both brands advocate each other
      in terms of quality. Let the custoemr decide which clubs they want to go with. I have a set of Adams Idea A12 forged Irons and I still can’t find a TM pro iron thats better.
      Get back to selling to the customer and to the customers needs not the £s and $s.
      Become a brand that produces quality over quantity and make the purchasing of a TM product mean something.

      All that excess stock in my opionion I would just give the retailers free reign to sell it as they wish and keep the money. Yes it will cost TM in the pocket but will repair some of the bridges TM have burned.

      Reply

      Neil

      10 years ago

      Get in some real talent? TM still has Kia Ma for designing putters and Clay Long who helped design the TP Wedges.

      Reply

      AJ

      10 years ago

      The current Taylormade equipment list is quite impressive and with the re-invention of the Tour Preferred line they have really hit their straps.
      Where to from here and what would be the one thing I would implement at TM as the new CEO?
      “Junior Development”
      Become the number one OEM in Junior Development.
      The Dick’s debacle is more about the financial mismanagement by a business more than it is about TM.
      Develop and nurture your future customer base whilst still doing business the TM way and you will still number one in twenty years time.

      Reply

      RON

      10 years ago

      Be a golf equipment company you used to be decades ago instead of being a PLASTIC golf company you are today.

      Reply

      RON

      10 years ago

      Stop putting too much money in commercials and paying non staff players to use your driver and how bout this make some quality forgings for a CHANGE for the public instead of only fr the tour guys and try putting some decent quality shafts in your drivers you charge 400 bucks for instead of just giving tour guys the good stuff where they dont pay a dime for, you think that might be alittle fair for a change you cheap basterds.

      Reply

      Regis

      10 years ago

      The problem with putting better quality stock shafts in a new driver is that it will increase the price. Very few want to listen but the cost of a top of the line driver has not gone up in 15 years. Its a fact. The shafts used in current drivers from any manufacturer can be purchased with a tip aftermarket for $39-59. I would like to see TMAG offer the same club (for example the SLDR) as an entry level but offer a second level new driver with shaft options that would be in the $150-$200 range(in all flexes). Give the retailers the shafts and allow them to better fit a wider variety of golfers. If a golfer doesn’t want the upgrade-fine. The downside is that the “B” driver would now be in the $499-$599 range , which is where it should be if you are only releasing a new line every 2 years but consumers continue to complain (erroneously in my mind) that the cost of new equipment is what is ruining the game.

      Reply

      golfercraig

      10 years ago

      Don’t feed the troll.

      Super Tuna

      10 years ago

      Callaway tried that with the iMix system. It didn’t seem to go over so well.

      Neil

      10 years ago

      Buy Callaway. Eliminate the competition. Just like buying Adams.

      Reply

      Scott King

      10 years ago

      I would fire myself with a huge golden parachute and by some sticks i like. hit the links, have a cocktail and call it a day

      Reply

      Desmond

      10 years ago

      Develop a line for the Average Joe and stick with it:

      The RBZ Driver and Jet Speed Line were the only clubs Average Joe could hit with some consistency.

      SLDR, SLDR S, R1, RBZ Fairways, et al were either not forgiving, the shafts too long, or the stock shafts were less than average quality.

      Crap for Average Joe.

      You’ve got to make clubs for more than Tour Players or Good Players with Speed.

      Adams can only do so much for Average Joe, and some guys don’t buy into the Adams Brand — either add more Tour players to it, or call it Adams by Taylormade, because I would bet Average Joe has no idea that TM owns Adams.

      But TM needs to attract the average Joe with more than marketing gimmicks. How about a high quality line of clubs for that market? And you would not need to update every year. Leave the annual updating to the Tour Wannabe Players.

      Reply

      SactoMike

      10 years ago

      Yea!!! I think one of the problems with this site is that it’s composed of people into golf in a big way. People who wouldn’t think of buying a club without being fitted, who put custom shafts etc in their clubs. And it’s great to hang here and listen, join in on occasion but folks we are a very small segment of the overall market. TMAG HAS to market to the “average joe.” The guy (or gal) who doesn’t give a good god damn about the shaft in their driver. Just wants to keep the ball somewhere in the fairway or at least in sight in the rough during their monthly round. They just want to know that TMAG is the number one driver on the tour……so “i’ll” play it too. They don’t care that comparing the club they buy to what a tour player plays is like saying there isn’t really all that much of a performance difference between a Volkswagen bug and a corvette. It’s either that or scale wayyyyyyyyy back and become a “boutique” company and just go after that 2% of the market that plays to a single digit handicap. I think having three lines beginner, GI and top line is great, just stick with it and don’t change the name etc.

      Reply

      Matthew

      10 years ago

      You guys realize that Taylormade relaeses new wedges every two years.

      Reply

      RAT

      10 years ago

      Fire Mark King
      reduce upper management positions( this won’t happen, the big boys club protects each other)
      stop trying to be all things to everybody.
      reduce the amount of pay out to players or pay based on points gained or cuts made .
      get into the small guy shops.
      reduce advertising funds.

      Reply

      RON

      10 years ago

      Have scratch golf do your wedges for a TP wedge line on the side, and why call your company TAYLOR MADE when the clubs loft lie and weight are no where close to being taylormade for a customer, make that name mean something instead of a BS advertising name and BURN those jet speed woods and irons to black ash in the crematorium lol, I agree with the person about having the iron heads a driver heads sold seperately to fitted like miura does, that what the word TAYLORMADE really means.

      Reply

      Simon ACT

      10 years ago

      There are some good suggestions made above and i’m sure TM will be looking all they can to see what people think.

      For them it’s about a) selling us product and b) maximising the spend we make on each product we buy. I think TM have, by and large, done quite well at A and not very well at B. In fact I believe a pretty solid arguement can be made that TM do very well at everthing on the design and development side, and pretty poorly on the retail side. Their treatment of retailers and punters alike has not done them any favours in the past 10 years and this is where they need to get better if they are going to turn things around.

      I think we may be seeing the first signs of TM changing with SLDR. The entire ‘Loft Up’ campain has highlighted the benefits of custom fitting to your average Joe, and also encouraged them spend up non OEM shafts which as well helping the golfer buy a better product, has helped to maximise the return for both TM and more importantly the return for the retailer. If they can continue with this type of model for irons, hybrids and putters then maybe the future isn’t so bleak after all.

      Reply

      Regis

      10 years ago

      IMHO your SLDR driver, fairways and irons are the best you’ve ever produced, at least for the average golfer. Keep the same heads for a while. If you want to introduce a limited edition gold colored head- go for it. But your stock shafts are blah. I still have a Matrix 5.5 which was a Taylor Made/ Matrix joint venture ( I believe it was for the R7 limited) that is the best stock shaft I’ve ever played. So you’ve got the best heads, and arguably the best shaft adaptors. Build your brand by offering a wide variety of after market shafts (in all flexes) to both new buyers and those that will want to keep their beloved SLDR but game a new shaft. Then in late 2015/early 2016 introduce the SLDR II that will accommodate the same shaft adaptors and thus the upgraded aftermarket shafts. Customers for life.
      By way of example I have a Matrix in my SLDR driver, a Misubishi Rayon in my SLDR 3 wood and a Fujikura Blur in my SLDR 5 wood. If I had stuck with the stock shafts not so sure I’d be coming back.

      Reply

      Neil

      10 years ago

      The SLDR Driver and Irons are really good. I personally play them. The TP Iron Sets are really good too. Keep them in the hopper for another year and keep the competitors guessing. Do not release anything new until Fall of 2015 or Spring of 2016. Back to the old two year cycles.

      The bulk of golf sales do not come from clubs. Most golf sales come from clothing, shoes and balls. So I think TM and Adidas golf should concentrate on these areas. The TP and TPX are great balls. TM’s marketing machine can bump these up to challenge Titleist and the Pro V1 and Pro V1x.

      Reply

      Aaron M

      10 years ago

      Stop being a catch-all company. Identify/develop a core business and focus solely on that. Drop everything else.

      In my estimation, that would be dropping the golf ball, wedge, and putter businesses. Focus efforts on drivers, hybrids, and irons. These are also Adams’ core competencies so there should be some help from their staff.

      Put a huge emphasis on custom fittings and market the hell out of that. If you’re going to really put the screws to your retailers, make it in a way that will benefit the customers. Make custom fittings a requirement–or at least highly recommended–for each retailer to perform before selling a club. Have customers get fit, then get clubs shipped rather than having on-hand inventories. This will reduce on-hand inventory of the resellers and could actually enable a six month-or-less product cycle.

      Reply

      AWOL

      10 years ago

      I think TMag could turn around here. I think the yearly enrollment is a worthy idea. But i also think they need to make a mends with all their retailers as well. So buy back is a good idea as well. Offer the free loft, lie, and regrip features with all their club lines, even if it is just once a year. In order to save costs i would also offer selling the club heads separately. This would also reduce their production and allow the consumer to get the newest clubs with their preferred shafts without having to spend all over again. Make the adapter universal for all woods to allow this. I think also offering a solid line of products is a good idea, like one forged offering, one GI model and one model that sits in between. I think if they get too many different line ups of irons going at the same time it is allowing for too much overhead. For example right now they have RBZ, Speedblades, SLDR, TP CB, TP MC, and TP MB, how about just Speedblades, SLDR and TP MB. Or if they still want all the TP models offer one set that is already mixed, like forged short irons and cavity back long irons. I also truly believe TMag golf balls are awesome stay with one name to allow a following to build up.

      Reply

      proside

      10 years ago

      A lot of the previous comments are sound. Most of us including myself agree on two points.
      – TM should reduce their release dates by having set cycles that enhance the customers confidence in their products not unlike Titleist.
      -Refine their product line with obvious demographic targets like a TP/Players line, GI line and a Novice/Beginners line. Again this would be like Titleist or Ping, both of whom have an excellent reputation.
      Frankly, I think that other than the drivers they should just stick with hacker clubs which would mirror their marketing acumen.
      My local mass retailer of golf equipment has the buy back deal with TM and has an entire sim 1 of 3, dedicated to their gear. Bullying their brand on the customer is a poor idea on the credibility factor. I’m not a fan of their practices and am quite vocal about it. IS that what you had in mind TM? Well you created it. It may be immature resentment on my part but TM is the last equipment I would purchase and the last I will recommend to any who ask.
      I imagine the other golf companies have no love for them either and TM and it seems Callaway, adopting the same marketing structure, may create a situation where the other manufacturers have little choice but to collude and put them down for good. I doubt it will come to that seeing as how they seem to be doing a good job of killing themselves right now but who knows.
      I’ll opt to stick with companies that trust their products and care about their customers earned disposable income.

      Reply

      Cleek

      10 years ago

      Up to 1960 or so, the big names were Wilson, Spaulding, MacGregor and Northwestern. Of these, only Northwestern was truly profitable. The others were more of a vanity business.

      In today’s world, Ping may be the only one who has gotten it right. (Though one could argue that Acushnet got it right–it sold Titleist and Cobra.) There have been relatively few technical advances in irons and woods–and a lot of what we see are modest improvements in designs (paint, logos, etc) and these might have been part of the initial design. At the amateur level there are very, very few who have worn through the score lines. Nike and Adidas are shoe companies–shoes wear out frequently, and they have applied the shoe mentality to clubs. And in many cases the clubs are as over-priced as the shoes. As an aside, retail outlets have been folding, but in my world demo days have all but disappeared–are they afraid to let the consumer do test drives?

      So, my as CEO–I would commit to a new product in a more predictable cycle–say year 1 irons, year 2 driver, year 3 fairway, hybrid. Putters and wedges could be interspersed–many will blame chipping and putting on the instrument.

      Golf shoes, hats, gloves, and balls get lost or dirty or simply wear out and need replacing–and this is where I would turn to the parent company and push the consumables.

      Reply

      Matt D.

      10 years ago

      Instead of 15 inch holes let’s stop holding technology back and release equipment meant to be played by amateurs, not pros. There’s no reason for someone to play what the PGA players do unless they’re planning on turning pro.

      There is a lot that can be done when you don’t have limitations on club technology. Head size would not actually change all that much.

      No reason to stop marketing it has done wonders for their business, see Cleveland Golf!

      Why is California even mentioned? It’s the world’s 8th biggest economy and have you ever been to the area? The fearless leader of this site might have something to add to this!

      The problems with Golf are bigger than just the equipment companies, although they do have a major impact on retailers, price and time with a changing audience are what needs to be addressed. Young kids just don’t find this sport appealing, but that’s most sports, unless it’s done online.

      Reply

      markb

      10 years ago

      I’m going to take the devil’s advocate position and say that I think TMag is actually AHEAD of the curve and are acting proactively to jump the next few hurdles they know they’ll be facing in this rotten domestic equipment industry.

      Sure, those hurdles are largely ones they created for themselves (short product life cycles, pipeline stuffing to retailers, gimmicky brands, etc.), but let’s not forget that TMag is moving AWAY from the foregoing even as some of their followers seem unwilling to change course. (i.e. Callaways has 3 more new drivers coming in 2014 while TMag has revealed 0 so far.)

      The pipeline stuffing is probably TMag’s toughest hurdle to jump. They relied on the Dick’s of the world to jam product and pump sales by promising take-back credits for overstock that made it look like they had a viable sell-through. That bubble has burst and it will cause devastation to TMag’s 2014 sales and earnings reports. Nothing they can do to change that now, so they’re probably thinking that they might as well take one big hit at once, shift gears, and promise their investors this was a one-time “re-adjustment” which can be put behind them. If that’s their plan, better to just bite the bullet BIG time now and pull all their splinters out at once.

      Hence, they proactively shut down Adams. TMag tried to market it as a niche brand to ladies and Seniors. All their advertising and tour spend was geared this way. “Own the second shot with our hybrids because you’re such an old duffer you’ll still be 220 out with your drive.” This strategy simply did not work. Ladies don’t buy clubs with frequency. Old timers want clubs that will roll back the clocks for them, they don’t want “canes” to help them hobble along.

      For years TMag took guff for gimmicky, doo-dad laden, art-deco painted sticks that golfers were embarrassed to bag even though they recognized their performance. (I actually spray painted the crowns of my RBZ 2’s, I was so embarrassed.) They were also criticized for not having irons that a true player would play.

      Now, all that is largely gone. A very conservative traditional TP iron line, muted gray SLDR’s, a SLDR iron that is handsome and traditional in all but name. TP wedges that are the model of classic wedge, while still offering the highly desired ATV sole for those who want them. (The ATV sole is nothing but Vokey’s M grind and they resell for MORE than the traditional grinds, sorry RookieBlue.) That leaves my still gaudy Speedblade. I don’t like the blue zigzag, but the SB is about the best GI iron on the market so I’ll live with it. If TMag is wise, they’ll release an SB 2 that is largely unchanged, but more traditional in appearance.

      And let’s not forget that TMag’s product release cycles have actually SLOWED DOWN. SLDR is over a year old and except for small variants within the product family (430, S, paint) it’s still one product with no signs yet of being replaced. I view the elimination of the Jetspeed (a fine club in its own right) as an ADMISSION that sticking with one product family for longer terms was best.

      In short, I think we tend to be slow and reactive in our criticisms of TMag. We’re still catechizing them for sins they committed last year, or in 2010-12, when they’re showing us in 2014 that they have confessed, self-flagellated and repented. In my view, TMag has offered up their sincere “mea culpa, mea maxima culpa” and we should be responding with “pax vobiscum” and hoping for a brighter 2015.

      Reply

      Barbajo

      10 years ago

      “Self-flagellated”!!!!! Love it mark! I think you have painted a pretty unique and rather accurate picture.

      Reply

      Jon

      10 years ago

      A bi-annual launch schedule that they stick to:

      Year One: Q1: One driver
      Q2: One set of improver irons
      Q3: Putters
      Q4: Hybrid

      Year Two: Q1: Wedges
      Q2: Player irons
      Q3: Fairway wood
      Q4: One innovation: i.e Mini Driver

      At least we’d know where we stand. We be able to schedule having a new club that is not out of date after five minutes.

      Reply

      Paul

      10 years ago

      Sell the company by 10 AM to boost my stock values that I would have as CEO, then by closing-bell, sell all my stock options, and bank the money from the sale!!!!!

      Reply

      Seth Spearbeck

      10 years ago

      I don’t know that I will be terribly original with this post, but I will take a shot. There are three things that on day on day one I would begin to change. First is the supply line. I would DRASTICALLY reduce the number of ‘off-the-rack’ options for the consumer to purchase. While some can’t wait to purchase and just have to buy off-the-rack I believe most golfers would respond positively to a fitting/special order process. Second, I would completely free up the Point of Sale folks to sell product that is 18 months or older at whatever cost they desire. Assuming that my sales force can verify they have legitimately attempted to sell the products for 6 months at in-house reduced rates then I would offer a buy back program. The goal will be to have TM product that is older than two years completely off retail store shelves. Yes, TM will take a bath on this but, it will reinvigorate the golf shops and the big-box stores to sell my product. It will also reduce the ability of the consumer to look at cheaper, earlier release, product that have little to no performance upgrades over current release equipment. Lastly, at least in my case, TM’s problem with the sheer number of club releases is that it makes me think they don’t believe in their own product. I want three, and only three, product lines on the market at a time. And no silly color change variants, etc… I would introduce a player’s line of clubs, a game improvement line and a beginner line. That’s it. Three year product cycle for the player’s line, two for the game improvement line and 18 mos. for the beginner. And again, small numbers of off-the-rack merchandise. I want everyone to get fit.

      Reply

      golfercraig

      10 years ago

      Golfers do not care about being “custom fit.” The guys screaming “FIT EVERY GOLFER!” have a distinct monetary reason for screaming it. Either they sell components for significantly higher margin than large OEM product, or they are selling you the “fitting” for a price that’s not realistic. The guy shooting 90 has no reason to get fit except for the bare basics. “Which of those 11 swings would you like me to fit, sir? You didn’t hit the middle of club one time. Your SS differs by as much as 8-10 MPH.” I’ve fit 10’s of thousands of players. Less than 5% really matter.

      Reply

      Busterpar

      10 years ago

      Spot on, my friend! I spent 12 years in the industry on the retail side and started fitting people in the late 1990’s. Golfers do care about “being fit” – but for 98% of the people I fit over the years it was an exercise in B.S. They want a pro level fitting with an 18 handicap swing. And then they buy an X flex with a 94 mph swing “cuzz my buddy told me to”, contrary to your hour of time and years of experience trying to get people into the correct club. I always asked if they took medical advice from their lawyer or vice versa, as they sure didn’t listen to my advice in my field of expertise.

      Andy W

      10 years ago

      Glad to hear you say that. I agree, “custom fit” has never been in any conversation in my rotating group of golfers that I have played with for over 25 years. Nobody cares about it. Yet, in Chicago, there are several ClubChampion(?) shops that have heads that screw into shafts, then hit em like crazy on Trackman, and this is a viable biz?

      Andy W

      10 years ago

      Prior to teaming up with Adidas, guessing TM did $600M/yr in golf sales; today does $1.5B/yr. Callaway around $950M/yr yet replaced their CEO expecting over a billion. Ping around $450M.

      As TM’s CEO, the single move I would make:
      Replace the gaudy isolated tent-bunker at the PGA Merchandise Show with an 8-booth area introducing the only putter in the world that comes with a “patented” Operating System. And said putter only comes with purchase of TM’s latest driver claiming all golfers will have the two best implements possible for their first and last strokes. For that matter, the best for over 50% of all strokes taken in a round! TM holler any time, but any comp package will need to include membership at Augusta National…:)

      Andrew J Walters
      http://www.expertgreenreading.com

      Reply

      Francis

      10 years ago

      Yes, the aswer is simplify the stuff, two drivers and one tp, with more custom shafts and 3 model of irons and 1 wedge.

      Two years rotation.

      Reply

      RookieBlue7

      10 years ago

      I’d look into moving the HQ to Florida or Tennessee or somewhere that doesn’t have a state tax to deal with to save a few million for starters. Yes, California is Mecca for golf. But why? It has one of the highest taxes in the nation. Why wouldn’t I want to move somewhere more friendly on the budget?

      Then I’d look at reintroducing the TP models full scale. Not an item here or there. It’d be the model and a TP version (like the SLDR 460 would be the standard and the TP would be the 430). I’d scale back production to have a base model and a to model and kill off the other 3-4 separate lines.

      Next I’d get away from gimmicky stuff, like the ATV wedge sole. Do a plain, simple wedge. And offer a standard (cast) and forged (tp). Everything would be simplified. And I’d cut down on the amount that’s produced as well as minimums for accounts.

      Reply

      Super Tuna

      10 years ago

      Why Carlsbad? Because of Military R&D.

      A lot of product innovations in golf have come via the Military R&D which is done in Carlsbad and is of the type that isn’t hush hush. Being near to it, gives golf companies the ability to quickly obtain, reinvent and use that information.

      Equally, that’s one amongst a host of reasons of why Ping doesn’t need to be there. They already do military R&D so don’t need to pull it from other sources

      Reply

      David W

      10 years ago

      I promise you, they aren’t paying those high taxes in CA. They have a deal or they wouldn’t be there.

      Reply

      SactoMike

      10 years ago

      I promise you Dave they are paying through the nose. I live in the Sacramento area. Intel has a large plant here. The vast majority of their memory chips as well as processors are made here. Virtually all of the R&D is done here as well. They almost moved, lock stock and barrel to….hold your breath…..Texas because of coasts associated with doing business in California. Did the state step in and say well gee you employ a few thousand people here, a lot of them in mid to high paying jobs. We will work out a tax break for you so you’ll stay here….nope. Left it to the city to help them negotiate better water and electricity rates, (they use large quantities of both) there was a local property tax deal done as well. The state did nothing but raise taxes.

      flaglfr

      10 years ago

      I believe one of the things that made both of these lines strong in the past was their target markets. TahyorMade used to specialize more (at least in my view) to the lower handicap market. They were good at it. Adams was good at the mid to high handicap segment. Therefore, I would:

      1. Compartmentalize the market share for each branch. Have TaylorMade be the low to mid low handicap segment and Adams the mid high to high handicap segment. all should be quality merchandise.

      2. Eliminate all old lines. Notice I didn’t say sell the old lines off at a discount. Get rid of them and begin anew. Costly? yes. But a hell of a lot better than flooding the market with old stuff. Sldr & Sldrs should be the only driver lines for TM. Everything else goes to Adams. Same for irons. Anything designed for people over 15-18 handicap is Adams.

      3. Segment off putters to a specialty group similar to Oddessy & Scotty. Put out some quality putters that are similar to the high end of the spectrum. Attach a mid to mid high handicap putter line to Adams. Again, not junk, just designed for higher handicaps.

      4. Streamline marketing for both companies.

      5. Have collaborative meetings for both companies. share ideas across the spectrum for better utilization of personnel.

      6. Drop slower swing speed balls into the Adams camp.

      7. Adopt new release schedule of no sooner than 10 months for any new or improved product. Use the marketing machine to increase demand for the eventual release date.

      In short, revive the quality moniker for both brands by segmenting them into the things each company seems to do well. Remember…. You asked.

      Reply

      Dave S

      10 years ago

      Only problem I see with this is that golfers, largely, are pretty vain. If Adams was designated the middling-to-sucky golfer brand, I guarantee there would be a large swath of the consumer market that wouldn’t go anywhere near it. I realize this sort of business model works for car companies (e.g. Toyota-Lexus), but the difference there is that you’re PAYING LESS for lower quality. I can guarantee you that if an Adams driver was the same price as a, for example, a Nike one, very few would buy the Adam’s if it was designated the high-handicap brand (even if it suited their needs better). The only way this model works is if Adams is cheaper – not just relative to the premium TM brand – but also to other OEMs… which you know they won’t (and likely can’t afford) to do.

      Reply

      flaglfr

      10 years ago

      Thanks for the comment. I’m not so sure it wouldn’t work. The thought I was trying to bring forward is not one quality company and one middling company, but two companies that are high quality but serving different market segments. The thought is to really bring the quality forward, and simply to do it for two specialized handicap levels. IMHO, this would be a great way for custom fitting to be brought forward in a quality way. In other words, not one Toyota and one Lexus brand but two Lexus (or maybe Lexus and Infiniti if you prefer) brands with different foci. This would actually play to golfer vanity instead of insulting it.

      You comment however brings up another great point. Why is it that we (yes you and me too) typically see a focus on higher handicaps as sucky golfers? We all started out there and will probably end up there at some point in time. In my mind, the sucky golfer is a market under-tapped by higher quality equipment companies.

      Higher handicappers are also the area where most of the improvements in MOI, perimeter weighting and other advances will help most. For example, a 6& under handicapper is not going to benefit as much from these types of technology advances. For higher handicaps, I believe the advances should be more apparent and therefore more valuable. They may also keep their gear longer (based on some of my friends who play and would fit into the mid to high hcp. range) which could make an investment in better equipment more saleable.

      SactoMike

      10 years ago

      And 85% of golfers that have a handicap are 18 or above. It was true 25 years ago and is still true today. They HAVE to market in someway to that group or give up 85% of the available market. I agree it doesn’t make sense to have two companies owned by the same parent competing directly with each other.

      flaglfr

      10 years ago

      Sacto,
      Thanks for the comment. TM is going to have to do something like what has been discussed by you, others and myself. IF they are going to survive, they are going to have to specialize. I agree with your comment that there must be marketing to higher handicaps as there are more of them than lower handicaps. But what company is currently seen as the highest quality club for the high handicap market? Who is the Honma for the double digit handicap set? I don’t see one at present. The closest in my mind to working for both classes is Ping. Ping has probably done the best job of bridging the gap for both player levels. Adams is probably a close second for the “own the second shot cause I hit a bad first” (yes I used artistic license for this one) emphasis. Even that could be argued that Ping is a high handicap company that is trying to cater to the lower handicap class.

      KInda boils down to a pick your poison scenario. If you want to specialize as the club for the player (a la Mizuno as an example) you are going to have to pick where you want to go and go there. If you want to specialize as THE club for what I will classify as the masses, you are going to have to go down a different road with one of the brands. To try to please all with both brands is the quickest road to failure.

      Andy W

      10 years ago

      Thinking the marketing approach of “Here is the highest quality club for just you, the high handicapp’er!” well, it has been done to death.
      What about selling the high handicapp’er that they play golf for a different reason, like to hit that “occasional” shot just as good as the best in the world. Like a 90yd wedge to a kick-in putt. The 25-ft putt with double break into the jar! Like one putt the green that Rory “4-putted” twice at Cherry Hills. To have a few strange or spectacular shots so as to have something to talk about at the bar, which is the real reason for playing..

      So just for out-of-the-box, “Pros use “tough to hit” Mizuno blades, so let’s make your feat apples to apples…”

      Qwagmire

      10 years ago

      1. Military, Active and Retired, get a set of clubs at cost, custom fit, once every 4 years. Pay the kids back.

      2. Consistency. I loved the TP3, but its been renamed so many times I have no clue which ball it is anymore. PICK A NAME AND STICK WITH IT!

      3. Stick with 3 levels (low, med, high handicap) of balls, clubs, heck even clothing with obvious names, I recommend The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly. That way I know walking into a golf shop what clubs and balls I should look at.

      Reply

      David W

      10 years ago

      Ditto on the TP3, great ball. Try the project A (which is what replaced it). Longer and spins more. That being said, I totally agree with the naming crap at TM.

      Reply

      SactoMike

      10 years ago

      Ahhh so that’s what it is! I love the TP3 and couldn’t agree more develop a line of balls and then stick with them, improve them if you want but stick with it. Hard to have loyalty to a ball if it changes names every 6 months.

      TW

      10 years ago

      I hate giving free advise but ill bite

      1. Remove or End their golf ball line
      Taylormades golf balls may carry some weight on tour but I hardly see them in local pro shops or run into people playing them at all. The market belongs to titleist, the best thing they did unlike every other…The prov1 was coined the best and they barely every change it and never renamed it. (if its not broke). Callaway has made great balls but never keeps them going (hex chrome plus, not yet discontinued but it will be). Nike could be onto something lets see what they do.

      2. explore producing a true standard and tour model driver (460 & sub 460) and leave it at that.
      Right now taylormade has the SLDR 460,SLDR TP 460, SLDR S 460, SLDR 430, SLDR 430TP and if you want to include the SLDR white , well theres one more.
      It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see why shelves are overstocked with these clubs (then you can add 2 sub lines RBZ 2 and jet speed.

      3. push the wedge tech. up a notch. Golfers are very loyal to a particular brand of wedge imo, I have never seen a TM wedge in anyones bag. Drivers are much different, there’s no loyalty to a driver given the technology and shaft options that come out each year. Make a great wedge and like a great ball, it can carry on for years

      Quality not quantity
      Release Cycle
      Feb / march
      Top tour model driver tour/performance models

      April / May
      Irons/Wedge

      Reply

      David W

      10 years ago

      I have to say I hope they don’t end their golf ball line. I like the TP over the Pro V (it’s longer and spins better for me) and I like the Project A (the one I play the most) over the NXT Tour for the exact same reasons. And I’m not the only one. More and more I’m seeing TM on the courses around here and I have yet to talk to anyone who has played the TP that says they like the Pro V1 better.

      Reply

      RevKev

      10 years ago

      I would look to build customer base by marketing my balls not for specific clubhead speeds but clubs – tour prefered line for tour level clubs, our balls work best with these because they are designed with our clubs in mind, yada, yada. Could help to cut into the Titleist market there.

      I’d also look to branch out into the golf course business by buying up smaller properties and using them as game developement areas. Make them junior/women/beginner friendly. Shorter courses, in good shape, great place to play 18 in 2 1/2 to 3 hours.

      Reply

      sidvicius

      10 years ago

      1- CEO salary and upper manament will be cut.
      2- Pro-players contracts will be reviewed and cut .
      3- R & D will be adjusted to provided the best club head and shaft for a fitted customer
      ( No more pre assembled product ) you need to come in to be fitted.
      4- Our product line for club heads will be for players and intermediate. ( no beginner product )
      5- Marketing and Sales will be small and to the point ( no more bullshiting ).
      6- As CEO go out and tell golf course’e they don’t have to have big club house’s, and rose’s on every tee box, those days are over.

      Reply

      Kenny B

      10 years ago

      I certainly wouldn’t have moved Adams from the tax-friendly state of Texas to California, one of the highest tax states in the country. Should have moved the other way.

      Reply

      Neil

      10 years ago

      You are correct. They should have moved everything to TX.

      Reply

      Joe Golfer

      10 years ago

      You are both correct about Texas, but keep in mind that state governments often give HUGE tax incentives to get companies to stay or open up in their own state.
      I have no idea if anything like that was done, but it is possible that California gave TM a huge tax break to run their business out of Cali.

      David W

      10 years ago

      I was about to say the same thing. Guarantee you they told CA that they could move to a tax friendlier state and CA said, “Not tax friendlier than we can be if you stay here.”

      SactoMike

      10 years ago

      Believe me California would be the last state to try and make it easy, less expensive to do business in state. Why would you want to give a break to someone that provides hundreds of jobs in your state, pays sales tax to your state, property taxes, income tax etc? (tongue in cheek here folks) The last time I looked if you wanted to build a manufacturing facility in Calif the permitting, envoirmental planning, and all the other stuff just to be able to break ground took 18 months to two years and cost hunndreds of thousands of dollars. This all for the privilege to pay some of the highest business tax rates in the nation. Texas? 90 days from start to breaking ground. Guy I play golf with every weekend works with a large retailer in the golf industry among other things he is overseeing the opening of a new store here in town. 18 months to open the store and this going into an existing building. Granted part of it is working with contractors etc but a lot of it is the hopes that the state makes you jump through. There is a reason why business is fleeing California. Yep if they truly wanted to save money thy should have packed up the station wagon and left SoCal with a sign on the back that said “Texas or bust.”

      Ryan

      10 years ago

      First thing I would do is bring back a name people remember and trust…. the TI Bubble. Bring back a modernized TI Bubble with the old school paint and look. To show customers that TM is committed to this product keep promoting this lineup ALL YEAR! This would be a great way to counter Callaway with thier BB lineup. A throwback to the competiton from the 90’s. I think TM really needs to focus on getting back the customers they have lost due to thier product cycles and recreate the desire and mystery that surrounds new product realeses on a yearly or 2 year realease cycle. To show a good faith jesture to Dicks and other retailers I would buy back 50% of thier excess inventory thats buired them in return for a new retail contract. The excess inventory can be sold to third party golf companys to help recoupe the cost of buying back the excess inventory. I dont have faith TM will step up and do any of this but one can dream!

      Reply

      mnfats95

      10 years ago

      Announce that you are scaling back product launches to focus on quality and real upgrades and then follow through.

      Isn’t it really that simple? You may have lost some customers due to recent practices, but they are already gone, bring them back to the fold in 3 years by showing them that you are committed to helping your products hold their value and not make you feel like an idiot for buying a product at launch that just got slashed by 50% 3 months later.

      That’s all it would take for me to forgive them, but then again I’m not every person.

      Reply

      Ed Rich

      10 years ago

      I’d introduce the Taylormade Preferred program, an annual or monthly based Club Subscription program.

      IE, Pay a $500 initiation fee on top of a $500 (or really, whatever you want the price to be, these are just easy numbers to work with) yearly fee for access to the TaylorMade Preferred Program.

      They furnish you with a 14 club set of your choice (all TaylorMade products, of course), which you can trade/mix/match as much as you like.

      Want to try a stiffer shaft in your SLDR? Send it in and the TPP sends you a replacement. Putter acting up? Trade it in. Moving to a 4 iron instead of 4 hybrid? Trade it in. New model comes out? Trade your old one in for the new.

      That’s just the tip of the iceberg. There’s virtually unlimited flexibility. Could charge more if the member wants like-new or unused clubs, a premium for release date access to new clubs, pro-rate based on the amount of clubs the member wants (ie if they have a Scotty and don’t need a putter). All the while giving them a huge discount on TM accessories and products. Send em T-Shirts, start up a TPP Member tour, yadda yadda yadda…

      You’d have insane customer loyalty, effortless customer retention, and huge interest in your new product all the while making it illogical to buy your competitor’s clubs. Just be sure to mail me dividends from the profit!

      Reply

      golfercraig

      10 years ago

      This has been discussed by more than one OEM for a couple of years now.

      Reply

      proside

      10 years ago

      The financials of that could be fraught with disaster but as a strategy for gaining or keeping customers it has a lot of legs.
      A one time membership fee and a yearly dues just like private GC’s for somewhat unlimited access to their brand could be fun endeavour.
      I would think that a contract would have to be signed, essentially an endorsement deal including on hats, bags and shirts etc. to make it a worthwhile gamble for the company.
      The down side to it could be that the customer gets bled out on the extras, again, akin to the clubhouse spending requirements at GC’s.
      If it was a multi tiered buy in structure it could work.

      VCURamGolf

      10 years ago

      Sure, there would definitely be some financial arithemetic to do to see if it could work, but in the end I think it would hugely benefit the consumers and TM.

      I think they’re just a lot of opportunities here – and a lot of flexibility. Not to mention, exclusivity is always an easy sell, especially in a sport like this.

      Dave S

      10 years ago

      This is hands-down the best “game-changing” option on the board. Everything else has been tried (and failed) or is still being done by other OEMs. Why adopt a Titleist/Ping model, when you are not Titleist nor Ping? They’ve spent years developing that business model and it works for them, not necessarily for TM. Reducing product lifecycles from the insane to the managable is a good start, but at the end of the day, it’s not a differentiator. Annual membership is the one thing that would turn heads. BUT, it would have to make financial sense not only to TM, but also to the customer. If I’m going to only play TM clubs, I better be getting somewhat of a deal on them… I love shopping around for new clubs just like the next guy/girl, and would hate to feel locked into TM unless it made financial sense. Nothing would suck more than seeing that new Titleist/Ping/Nike, etc. driver come out and wanting it so bad, but not being able to get it b/c you’ve already paid your yearly fee with TM and it wouldn’t make sense.

      Reply

      Ed Rich

      10 years ago

      Could do a monthly plan instead, so you aren’t locked in for a full year, or in the winter months when you can’t even see the ground under the snow. Could also instead opt to do a 13 club program if you really want that new Ping/Titleist Driver or putter or something.

      The biggest ? for me is if it would make sense for TMAG to do something like this. Without knowing their financials/margins/etc it’s impossible for me to be able to predict or put a price point on it, but I will tell you one thing – if it was a $500 initiation fee and $500 a year for access to the entire TMAG catalog on demand, I’d sign up immediately. The guys that were buying a whole new set every 6 months are going to be the guys that TMAG will miss with a program like this, but how many of those guys are there anymore?

      And remember – if you’re TM, you’re not even selling the clubs to the members of this program. They are renting them from you, which means that when a new line launches and the members trade in their current set for the newest one, you’ve got the clubs back, which YOU can turn around and sell (or rent out to a lesser tier of membership) – instead of the member selling them to his buddies or to a third party. You could even make your new release clubs unavailable for purchase to the general pop at first (members only perk). Boom, demand is instantly driven up, your people feel like exclusive members of a club, and you can sell last cycles products at close to full price for a longer period of time.

      I get more and more ramble-y with each of these posts, but the options here are really endless.

      You could partner with Dicks or GG and make their locations an official TPP trade-in spot.

      You could have a Taylormade Preferred Program Tour that goes around the country doing fun events.

      You could have a TPP online club that tracks handicaps

      A TPP App that goes with their membership that does the whole GPS/stroke counting thing.

      There is just limitless potential, opportunity, and flexibility here – all while denying that to your competitors.

      Ed Rich

      10 years ago

      Just had some more thoughts:

      Father/Son/Family membership discounts (start em young)
      Partnering with local courses to offer discounts for TPP members (in exchange for better distributor pricing)
      1 Free fitting a year
      Discounted lessons at the performance institutes or with partnered pros
      Option-to-buy programs (reduce your membership fee by X amount if you have a club you just love)
      Tiered Membership Levels (Level 1 – 2 cycles ago, Level 2 – 1 cycle ago, Level 3 – current cycle)
      Monthly/Quarterly/Annual pricing options

      I mean you could really, really make this an absolute steal for every single golfer out there from hack to scratch.

      This would be a great way to turn the entire industry on its head, while restoring trust in your brand, interest in your products.

      I just don’t know the profit potential – but as I said above, I would 100% do this program and I am a Callaway/Ping guy. Callaway and Ping would lose my money and TMAG would gain a new, faithful but sunk cost fallacy customer.

      SactoMike

      10 years ago

      What an interesting idea. I’d be a guy that would definitely be interested in a program like this. From TMAG’s standpoint I would think that the financials could be worked out so that TMAG could make money and still make it enticing to the end user. The problem I see with it is at the retail level. They would be cutting the retailer’s out of a significant piece of their customer base. i.e. the guys like you and I that will spend $500 to $1,000 a year on equipment, Year in and year out. They would effectively be going into competition with their retailers. Generally a OEM uses an internal sales force to sell to the end user or a separate distribution channel i.e. retailers. Not both. I’ve worked in industries where the OEM does both and believe me it’s fraught with dangers. Both sides feel like they are basically competing with the OEM, knock drown drag out battles when going after the same end user, An OEM bidding on the same job that their distributor is and then choosing who to give the job to and determine the profit rate that the distributor gets, Poaching customers etc. It’s not a pretty picture. And that’s what TMAG would be doing with every retailer in their distribution chain. “we want you to sell our product, not Calleway, not Ping etc.Oh by the way we are going to compete with you for your core customers and offer them a program that you can’t begin to compete with. By the way how many of the new super duper SLDRR11Jetspeed drivers did you want to order?”

      I think it’s a great idea for the end user just not sure that TMAG could make it fly with their retailers. Maybe they should just get away from the retail distribution chain all together and open up a string of TMAG stores around the world. It worked for Apple, well kinda since they don’t undercut their retail distribution chain.

      Reply

      RON

      10 years ago

      Have Endo forge their irons and get away from those cheap forgings they make fr the public, put better quality shafts in their drivers and do a 3 year irons and drivers cycle not 2 like other companies do something totally different.

      Reply

      Clod Diggler

      10 years ago

      I think tailor made should giv drivers away as promo. I’ll tak 1 and demo and give feedback and help sel it.
      I wud also make more drivars for defferent handiceos. I dun like hooks, so mor opan.
      I also think maybe stik to blak only putters.
      Giv a free glove for balls.
      Sell just shaft and gripes.
      And me a free ball cap pleese

      Reply

      O. Jones

      10 years ago

      Given all of the recent events in the world of golf, the issues above, saturation in the retail channel, giving equipment away as leverage to sell Adidas apparel/footwear at green grass, etc… in other words leaving everyone in the industry to clean up this mess – tell me again why Mark King was promoted?

      Reply

      Adam

      10 years ago

      Put all of the company’s eggs into a single club model/series and sell the hell out of it. Do the Titleist-approach better than Titleist can.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
    Buyer's Guides
    Apr 12, 2024
    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
    First Look
    Apr 12, 2024
    Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
    News
    Apr 12, 2024
    PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.