In a recent social media post, Callaway claimed its Chromesoft is more centered than a Titleist Pro-V1x. Do they have the data to back their claims?
- 1:45 – Most Wanted Putter Testing Commences
- 3:19 – Callaway’s questionable golf ball claims
- 23:34 – How is Titleist’s quality control so tough to compete with?
- 30:27 – The new Pro-V1/Pro-V1x
- 35:27 – The next gen of ERC-Soft with Triple Track
- 37:14 – Can Mizuno ever hit #1 in Drivers?
Watch Now
Also available on:
and all major podcast apps.
Jordan
4 weeks agoNow that I’m seeing the commercials on TV, a new Callaway ball test is in order. Seems hard to believe they can right the ship that quickly.
Christopher
1 month agoDidn’t Titleist recently make claims about a Callaway ball (I think it was even printed inside the box)? Callaway would have ensured that their statements were deemed opinion or they’ve conducted a limited test with set conditions to back up their “data” if needed. It’s unlikely that the claims are actionable.
Paulo
1 month agoYou might not like them saying it but if Titleist disagrees significantly and can prove outright otherwise, they’ll pursue them through the courts. That will be when Calloway have really screwed up. Until the it’s genius provocative marketing that will only have a positive impact on their sales.