First Look – Callaway Chrome Soft X Triple Track
Golf Balls

First Look – Callaway Chrome Soft X Triple Track

First Look – Callaway Chrome Soft X Triple Track

Lines are science. That’s the premise behind Callaway’s Triple Track Technology which it first unveiled with the ERC Soft ball in early January. ERC Soft was the answer to the Titleist Tour Soft ball.

With this release, Callaway is bringing its line-based technology (YMMV) to an actual tour ball. The new Chrome Soft X flavor of Triple Track has been played by Callaway’s most eclectic staffer, Phil Mickelson. Three lines aside, it’s the same Chrome Soft X with Graphene-infused Dual Soft Fast Core and urethane cover that’s been on the market since early 2018. The ripple, of course, is the addition of scientifically-backed alignment lines, which cover half the circumference of the ball. The other half is blank, so the lines are only there when you want them to be. With that, if the technology works, it’s reasonable to question when it might be to the players’ benefit not to use it?

Triple Track Technology is based on Vernier Hyper Acuity, which allows the brain to operate beyond typical visual limitations. When our eyes are provided certain cues (such as lines of particular color, width, and spacing) a state of hyperacuity can be achieved, whereby the brain is more sensitive to minute differences and can discern straightness better, the net result is an enhanced ability to aim, which is why the technology is used for guns and to help pilots land on aircraft carriers. When trying to get a 1.68″ ball in a 4.25″ cup, minute differences in aim can certainly be the difference between a miss and make – at least that’s the theory. If success on the course is due, in part, to the elimination of as many variables as possible, visual technology which helps direct focus deserves some serious consideration.

We don’t often see technology trickle-up product lines as it’s typically the absence of said technology which helps separate models and, in part, justify price differences. But Callaway is now a solid #2 in the ball category and has shown zero hesitation to go down whichever path it feels might help it grab a bit more market share.

GET FIT FOR YOUR GAME WITH TRUEGOLFFIT™

Unbiased. No Guesswork. All Major Brands. Matched To Your Swing. Advanced Golf Analytics matches the perfect clubs to your exact swing using connected data and machine learning.

FREE FITTING

With the emergence of Callaway’s Truvis, TaylorMade’s TP5 PIX, and now the Chrome Soft X with Triple Track Technology has visual technology become a factor into your ball purchasing decisions?

Availability and Pricing

Retail Availability for the Callaway Chrome Soft X Triple Track begins April 19th. Retail price is the same as the white and Truvis versions of the ball – $44.99/dozen

 

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris is a self-diagnosed equipment and golf junkie with a penchant for top-shelf ice cream. When he's not coaching the local high school team, he's probably on the range or trying to keep up with his wife and seven beautiful daughters. Chris is based out of Fort Collins, CO and his neighbors believe long brown boxes are simply part of his porch decor. "Isn't it funny? The truth just sounds different."

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Sean

      4 years ago

      This is the ONLY place I’ve seen (and the chrome soft 2020 page on MGS) confirming the ‘19 triple track ball is actually a different compression ball then the original CSX. Why was it kept such a secret by callaway and just buried?

      Reply

      Sam Cooper

      5 years ago

      just now
      This ball is a completely different ball than the regular Chromesoft X. Much firmer compression and different cover hardness. Callaway got roasted by MyGolfSpy because the current Chromesoft and Chromesoft X are, quite frankly, bad. One would think Callaway would be transparent about this for the good of people playing their balls, but they have said nothing. If you are a Chromesoft X player and decide to put the new CSX Triple Track in play, just know it is a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT golf bal

      Reply

      Sean

      4 years ago

      Why is this totally buried? No news anywhere.

      Reply

      Jim

      5 years ago

      I use a ball rotater to mark a line on the cg balanced ball. I’m not sure if it helps but at least I know any wobble is self induced.

      Reply

      THETaderSalad

      5 years ago

      I think “average number of putts per round” should be a requirement in order to post here. Lots of folks bashing something they’ve never tried. To the guy putting 40+x a round, this might be the breakthrough.

      To the guy putting 26x a round, this will probably not be appealing to him. If you’re a better putter, understand the target audience before knocking a product. I average in the 33-34 putts a round. It’s what is keeping me from breaking 78 consistently. I’m all game for trying a sleeve or two out and see what happens.

      Reply

      Rusty Shackelford

      5 years ago

      It’s a completely different golf ball than the current chrome soft x available to retail. Notice the diamond in between Chrome Soft? Thats the most popular version on tour of the Chrome Soft X, and they are now releasing it with the Triple Track. It’s a completely different ball, not the same ball with lines drawn on it.

      Reply

      JayC

      5 years ago

      This is great information. I saw tour players use chrome soft x with a diamond logo between ‘chrome’ and ‘soft’ and I really wanted to try those, and finally, I can.

      Reply

      SNP

      5 years ago

      Confirmed……my local rep said this is NOT the same as the standard CSX golf ball. Unfortunately he does not know or could not share at this point how it is different from the other. Not that 99% of us could tell much difference but it would still be nice to know for peace of mind.

      Reply

      SNP

      5 years ago

      I prefer to use a line on my golf ball for putting (20′ and in) and have done so for years. I tried some of these (ERC) last fall and don’t know if it was coincidence or not but I made nearly everything I looked at and the putts that didn’t go in looked like they would. The ERC was not the right ball for me but on a CSX, I will be getting some for sure. Are lines good or bad, simply in the eyes of the beholder. Mallet or blade, reverse overlap, left hand low or claw…….when it comes to putting god knows we’ll try anything to get that ball to go into the hole. If you are 30 putts or less per round by all means stick with what you are doing. If not try something different whether it’s something subtle such as lines on your balls or something completely radical. If it works let me know as I will be out trying it tomorrow!

      Reply

      Mike Williams

      5 years ago

      Its crazy I admit, but these l lines have led to more made putts. Yes, I used to mark my own balls – or not. My self drawn lines didnt seem to help me so it was a hit and miss effort (pun intended). But these lines helped so much the even though the ball doesn’t really fit my game, I used them anyway. Glad they are adding the lines to a tour ball.

      Reply

      Dave Vardon

      5 years ago

      If you really like how the ERC performs or were using Chrome Soft X as your go to ball, then by all means spend the $$ and continue on your merry way as they probably do help some golfers make more putts; however, I will continue to use my mid price balls and mark arrows or lines on them should I find that helps – so far it hasnt, but I can identify my ball much easier, lol

      Reply

      KP

      5 years ago

      I concur with Tim and his crowd. When I see all white I putt right. No second guessing where the line points, no hesitation. Trust what I am doing and pull the trigger. Lines are fine if you’re a coke addict.

      Reply

      Scott

      5 years ago

      I understand that this isn’t for everyone and I have tried using a line on my ball in the past and would always get frustrated and give up on it but I have been using this triple track thing on the ERC balls for last few weeks and I feel it really has helped my putting. I only use it from 15′ and in but I find it is easier to line the 3 lines up then to fiddle with a single line for 10 minutes.

      Reply

      Will

      5 years ago

      $45 for 3 lines on ball; give me a break, no thanks… Anyone have a sharpie???

      Reply

      Chris Nickel

      5 years ago

      It’s still $45/doz sans Triple Track Technology. So it’s not as if you’re being asked to pay more for something in which you might not find value. Now, if Callaway increased the price for this edition, it would be a different conversation, but that’s simply not the case.

      Reply

      Brad

      5 years ago

      The ERC Soft golf balls cost $10 more per dozen ($59.95) than the Chrome Soft balls ($49,95) in Australia. All because of these flipping lines.

      I’m sure that the new “Triple Track” Chrome Soft balls will be $20 more than the standard ones as well, at least over here. I don’t know how Callaway can justify that sort of pricing structure, but they seem to think those lines are worth almost a $1 a ball here. Whatever…

      Mike

      5 years ago

      I have used a blue line on my ball for years along with using a 2 ball putter. For me it allows me to set my line and the only thing I have to worry about is speed. One less thing to think about before my putting stroke. As far as taking additional time on the green, I think more people should do it. It’s the only part of my game that I take additional time because I feel it’s the most important.

      Reply

      Shannon

      5 years ago

      I have tried Lines….and I have tried them again and each time, I have failed with them. Pick your line, pick a spot 1 inch or so in front of the ball and aim at that spot…..for me, lines give me one more thing to think about, when I would rather not think…..

      Reply

      GilB

      5 years ago

      If you can’t mark your own ball, whatever brand it might be, then these are for you.

      Reply

      Alan

      5 years ago

      A half-way intelligent person should realize that the same thing will look different from different angles. I use fatline. You align the ball from behind, take your stance, look at the hole for distance and putt. It’s really a no-brainer. Or should be.

      Reply

      Carolyn

      5 years ago

      ..I was just given a half dozen Taylormade balls with fancy little things all over them and they feel and play great, and last month they gave me both the Taylormade 5 and 5x to try.. and before that both the PROV and PROVX…I am going nuts trying to figure out if there is a game changing difference in them somewhere…I play to a 8 from the men’s regular tees (mostly White) and I am in golf ball hell…

      Reply

      Brian P

      5 years ago

      I don’t know that this qualifies as “technology”, but I have been using a similar marking scheme on my ball for years. It really helps me align. Even if its not perfect or looks different from when I align to when I address, its still easier to adjust. My philosophy is to point the lines along my intended line and trust it when I address. This vastly improved my putting over the last couple years. Not going to play this ball as a Titleist man, but I do like the lines.

      Reply

      Spitfisher

      5 years ago

      I know lots of people waiting for this triple track on a performance ball.

      As far as if this is “technology ” or not, the 2 ball putter is likely one of the biggest success stories in putters, still being sold today in big numbers.

      Reply

      Thomas A

      5 years ago

      Same here, I use the blank portion of the ball. It’s one less variable in alignment.

      Reply

      Lou

      5 years ago

      I find it difficult to place the lines straight up and down each time. There always seems to be an alignment tilt either way. Aligning every putt is also a sure way to upset your playing partners as it takes a lot of time. If the whole foursome aligns each putt then you sure don’t want to be playing behind them!

      Reply

      Tim

      5 years ago

      Here’s my experience with putting with balls with lines on them:

      1) crouch behind the ball, aim the lines at the spot.
      2) stand next to the ball, look down. “Eh, the lines dont look quite right”. Question myself: “is it because Im on a slight slope right now?” “did I aim the lines correctly?”.
      3) Go back behind it to check the line(s) again. Playing partners groan after seeing this same dance for 5 holes.
      4) Stand over the ball. “Dang the lines still look weird”. “Ok I’ll just trust them and go for it”.
      5) blow the ball 7′ past the hole with a tense jerky putting stroke.
      6) realize that the ball is a tiny sphere and trying to use a line on a tiny sphere to aim on a surface that is full of undulations is useless.
      7) Just play golf, and continue to ignore all of the bs that manufacturers continue to put out trying to make 3% more volume than last year, understanding that they are just employees trying to make bonus and send their kids to college.

      Reply

      Stephen

      5 years ago

      Tim- If you wanted to you could just practice aiming with the lines and then trust it, allowing you to skip steps 2-4 and avoid the tension that creates #5. Just an option for you to consider.

      That said, I don’t use any alignment marks on the ball. I find it very difficult to get the ball to stay where I want it aimed. Perhaps the greens I play on are not maintained well enough.

      Reply

      Lynn

      5 years ago

      I with you, Tim. I have tried multiple times to use a line. My experience is very similar to yours. And, I have practiced with a line a ton! For me, it’s all about getting your eyes aligned!

      Reply

      Pete H

      5 years ago

      I used to think exactly the same but I’ve recently started using the Callaway ERC Soft ball that has these lines and I have to say – for long putts it has definitely helped. For short putts I find it too distracting but on the longer ones it has made a big difference to my game. Im definitely getting the ball closer to the hole and not adjusting my line once stood over the ball, which is something I used to do a lot…

      Reply

      Stephen

      5 years ago

      Pete- That’s an interesting point. I struggle on putts over 30′ (not alone in that category), and I have not tried using the alignment guide on my ball. On short putts I find it very difficult to get the line to stay where I want, so it becomes a distraction. On these long putts maybe it will be a net positive. I’ll give it a shot!

      David

      5 years ago

      I wouldn’t call 3 lines on a ball “technology”

      Reply

      Will

      5 years ago

      Totally agree, even if there is demonstrable scientific verification of the phenomenon, Everything is a “technology” these days. Sheesh…

      Reply

      Andre

      5 years ago

      Thanks for letting us know.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.