First Look: Cleveland Frontline Putters
News

First Look: Cleveland Frontline Putters

First Look: Cleveland Frontline Putters

Is putter MOI dead?

Well, if Cleveland is right about the tech behind its new Frontline Putter series, MOI may not be dead, but it sure as hell isn’t healthy.

Cleveland is very much an under-the-radar purveyor of putters, featuring useful technology at attractive price points. While the company lacks the artistic eye-candy chops of Bettinardi/Cameron or the Tour appeal and mass marketing of PING/Odyssey/TaylorMade, it does have a deep lineup of flatsticks serving a wide swath of golfers. If your goal is to get the ball in the damn hole and not spend an arm, leg or sell a vital organ to do it, you’d be hard-pressed to find a better value.

With Frontline, Cleveland is making a statement: all that stuff you know about putter MOI? Fuggedaboudit.

It’s what’s up front that counts.

Frontloading Frontline

What would you think if, the next time you’re looking at a 15-footer for birdie, someone yells timeout and moves your ball five feet closer to the hole, so it’s now a 10-footer?

Personally, I’d be thinking what’s this going to cost me…

“Obviously, a putter can’t move your ball 33% closer to the hole,” says Cleveland Golf Marketing Director Brian Schielke. “But the forward CG technology in Frontline, once you understand it, can help golfers make a 15-foot putt at the same rate as they can make a 10-foot putt.”

Statements like that tend to make you reach for your torch and pitchfork and storm the nearest castle, and rightfully so. But there is something to forward CG in putters, which actually lowers MOI. The tech isn’t easily explained, and the obvious question is how can a lower MOI be a good thing for a putter?

The benefits of a high MOI putter are the same as a high MOI driver. Even though putters don’t travel anywhere near as fast as drivers, off-center hits will still reduce ball speed and change the side angle at which the ball leaves the putter face. That means you’ll leave putts short and off-line. Higher MOI can help.

However, to increase MOI, putter heads have to get big, sometimes really big. And the higher the MOI, the deeper the putter head’s CG has to be, and this can cause the face to move laterally on off-center hits, which, ironically, moves putts offline.

“Naturally the club is going to rotate around its CG,” says Dustin Brekke, Cleveland’s Director of Engineering, Research and Development. “The deeper the CG, a very large force is telling the ball to go forward, but since the CG is deep, there’s also a small amount of force telling the ball to go sideways.”

“If you bring all that CG right up to the exact face, there’d be no sideways force at all. But that’s impossible to do.”

We all know center strikes go where we want them to and at the speed we want them too, but we also know that even the best putters miss-hit putts more often than they’d care to admit. While designing the Frontline series, Cleveland used computer simulations to model CG location and its relationship to sideways force on off-center strikes.

Comparing a forward CG blade to a deep CG mallet, Cleveland found that on a 20-millimeter mishit (about an inch off-center), the blade will be about a half-degree offline, while the mallet will be about two-degrees offline.

Depending on the length of the putt, that difference could put the ball outside of the realm of the cup.

“The trigonometry of it all, a half a degree doesn’t move the ball outside of the hole until you reach a 20-foot putt,” says Schielke. “Two degrees moves the ball outside of the hold on a five-foot putt.”

Even with a 10-millimeter mishit, you’d be a degree off with a deep CG putter, and only a quarter-degree off with a frontloaded putter.

“In that most extreme case, you could do everything right. Your speed’s right, your aim is right, you’re square at impact, but if the only thing you did was miss just a touch off-center – still with a square face – you could miss a five-foot putt off to the right.” – Brian Schielke, Cleveland Golf

Cleveland isn’t saying everyone should run out and buy the thinnest blade they can find, but they are saying moving the CG farther forward can take a big chunk out of that unwanted sideways force on those occasions when you don’t hit it in the middle.

GET FIT FOR YOUR GAME WITH TRUEGOLFFIT™

Unbiased. No Guesswork. All Major Brands. Matched To Your Swing. Advanced Golf Analytics matches the perfect clubs to your exact swing using connected data and machine learning.

FREE FITTING

Front & Center, Heel & Toe

How is Cleveland moving the CG forward in the Frontlines? With Tungsten Forward Weighting: two Metal Injection Molded tungsten weights in the face – one in the heel, the other in the toe – that move 47.3 grams of weight about as far forward as it can go. And Cleveland is doing that while keeping, for the most part, the same putter head shapes used in its most recent TFi 2135 lineup, which the Frontline series is replacing.

“If you compare the last generation Elevado and the new Frontline Elevado, we’ve moved the CG forward by about 30%,” says Brekke. “All while keeping it roughly the same overall shape, appearance, and so on. By taking weight out of everywhere we could and bringing it forward, as well as placing it heel-toe, we don’t sacrifice MOI, but the forward CG gives us this azimuth correction.”

The other benefit of a high MOI/deep CG putter is minimizing ball speed loss on off-center hits. Cleveland mitigates that with face grooves it calls Speed Optimized Face Technology – or SOFT. It’s a variable face groove pattern designed to equalize ball speed across a wider area of the face.

It’s not unique – other OEMs have variations – but simply put, the face groove pattern features more groove and less actual contact surface in the center and less groove and more actual contact surface as you move away from the center. If you miss off-center, there’s more face to contact the ball, which mitigates ball speed loss and ultimately get the ball to the hole. According to Brekke, SOFT technology is what makes the forward CG work.

“If you just had forward weighting, you might still lose speed and come up short,” he says. “If you just had Speed Optimized Face Technology, you might have the right distance, but you might miss by a few degrees. We’ve done both – we have the line, and we have the speed, which is what you need to make putts.”

Cleveland has used variations of SOFT going back to the original Huntington Beach putter line, and it uses a specific face pattern for each particular putter, as a higher MOI mallet needs a different face pattern than a lower MOI blade. The Frontline putters use similar technology, but instead of face milling a stainless-steel putter head, Cleveland is forging the groove pattern into an aluminum insert.

“Every previous generation was a milling – meaning you have a large tool spinning and cutting this pattern,” says Brekke. “Every one of those arcs has a radius that can’t be changed because of the tool. With a forging process, you can have this S-type milling pattern. If you tried to mill it, you’d need a small engraving bit and cut over single groove individually. That’s what PING and Evnroll do, and it makes their products more expensive.”

Whither 2135?

While the Frontline series is replacing the phased-out, two-year-old TFi 2135 Satin putter lineup, the 2135 alignment technology isn’t going away.

In the world of alignment lines, dots and other doo-dads, you do have to give Cleveland innovation props for 2135. The name comes from the height, in millimeters, of the equator of a golf ball. The idea is to help you position the sightline on the exact center of the ball – which is 21.35 millimeters from the ground – regardless of whether your eyes are behind, over or in front of the ball.

In previous 2135 models, the actual sightline was behind – and below – the actual topline of the putter, which gave the putter a unique appearance at address. With Frontline, the sightline is right on the topline of the putter, but it’s still at 21.35 millimeters. It’s a cleaner, more traditional look that should satisfy the putter purist. On the other hand, Cleveland has actually slimmed the face down on the three mallets so that the topline lines up directly with the ball’s equator. The lone blade in the lineup has a taller, more traditional face and does not offer the 2135 alignment.

“2135 is an alignment positioning technology to get you started, and then your distance control and direction control gets you going,” says Schielke. “But if you hit it with a 10-degree open face, then all the technologies in the world aren’t going to help you much.”

Final Thoughts, Price, and Availability

So, is putter MOI dead?

“In many ways, yes,” says Brekke. “Because the weighting on Frontline is so heel-toe, we have essentially the same MOI as our previous models, despite moving the CG so far forward.”

“It’s not a trade-off for us. The dual technology (forward CG, SOFT face grooves) gets us the best of both worlds. We get distance control and direction.”

As always, MyGolfSpy’s Most Wanted testing will root out how well Frontline technology works, but a few practice sessions and actual rounds can start to tell the story. First off, the extreme front CG gives Frontline putters a unique feel – if you use a mallet with a deeper CG or even a mid-mallet, you can feel the difference when you pick it up.

We found distance control to be spot-on with Frontline – not surprising given Speed Optimized Face Technology and similar tech from other OEMs – and each model is different enough in appearance to suit the stroke and eye of most golfers. However, the lineup could most certainly use a mid-mallet at some point for those of us in between a blade and full mallet.

As stated earlier, Frontline’s three mallets and one blade are distinct enough to fit a large chunk of golfers. The 4.0 blade is a traditional Anser-style, with a 350-gram head weight, a moderate toe hang and plumber’s neck for a slight arc stroke. The mallets are all 370-gram heads and include the fang-toothed Elevado, the rounded Cero and the square, open-backed ISO. Each mallet is available in two options: face-balanced with a single bend hosel for a straight back-straight through stroke or a moderate toe hang with a slant neck hosel for a slight arc stroke.

Frontline putters will be available in 33, 34 and 35-inch models, with a standard 3-degree loft and 70-degree lie. Initially, only the face-balanced Elevado will be available for lefties.

The stock grip is a Frontline-branded Lamkin SINKFit pistol which, when paired with the blacked-out shaft and black head, gives Frontline a Captain Midnight look. “Market surveys say the grip is important – it makes you want to grab the club and try it at retail,” says Schielke. ‘We put so much into our putter head technologies, and someone says ‘eh, I really don’t like that grip,’ and they never even try it.”

Overall, the Frontlines aren’t as sexy as a Bettinardi or a Scotty, and the finish isn’t as refined as a PING or an Odyssey, but they are a nice enough looking putter, especially considering their price points.

The Frontline 4.0 blade will retail for $179, while the three mallets will retail for $199. They’ll be in stores Friday, September 13th.

Cleveland has carved out a nice niche for itself in the sub-$200 putter market without a dedicated fitting program. Since the company builds all its clubs at its Huntington Beach HQ, its custom department can build to any spec you want, so perhaps a fitting program isn’t necessary, or even possible at that price point. But it is the difference between “we’re a putter company” and “we’re a golf company that also sells putters.”

Cleveland offers plenty of putter tech at a price that won’t make you grab your torches and pitchforks, but we want to know is it enough for you to take it seriously as a putter company?

For You

For You

Golf Wedges
Apr 16, 2024
Vokey WedgeWorks Low Bounce K Grind Wedge
News
Apr 16, 2024
It Was A Masters To Forget For LIV Golf
Golf Apparel
Apr 16, 2024
adidas Pioneers Next Generation of Lightweight Golf Garments
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John is an aging, yet avid golfer, writer, 6-point-something handicapper living back home in New England after a 22-year exile in Minnesota. He loves telling stories, writing about golf and golf travel, and enjoys classic golf equipment. “The only thing a golfer needs is more daylight.” - BenHogan

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

We Tried It: Penfold Sunday Stand Bag
Apr 18, 2024 | 4 Comments
Shot Scope V5 Golf Watch
Apr 3, 2024 | 14 Comments
Driver Shopping Do’s and Don’ts
Mar 29, 2024 | 5 Comments
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Joe Galbreth

      4 years ago

      The Frontline Cero is SOLID. If you struggle with leaving putts short, this is your solution.

      Reply

      Rob

      4 years ago

      I’m curious as to what your reasoning is here. That is my struggle at the moment.

      Reply

      Chris

      5 years ago

      I’m willing to consider it. I played my way out of a crippling three-year case of yips this season, thanks in some part to the Huntington Beach Soft #11 with the slant neck. Some combo of weight, balance, stroke path, and feel off the face just made sense, and confidence started coming back. Hcp for our 9-hole league went from 7 to 3. When I saw the Elevado in a slant neck, I had to stop for another look …

      Reply

      Count Tyrone Rugan

      5 years ago

      Never Compromise had this with the Voodoo putters. Nice to see that the concept is coming back.

      Reply

      JasonA

      5 years ago

      Hmm, math does check out. The force vector taken from the CG will be moving away from the desired point on face by the tan(angleOfMiss) x distanceCG is back from face. That’s a linear relationship.

      I never got on with mallets, old blade putters performed surprising well in old equipment vs. new. Hope that Cleveland have nailed something interesting here.

      Reply

      Mid-handicap fun

      5 years ago

      This season I picked up a Cleveland CBX 56 wedge on a whim for $99, and it’s fantastic. That purchase experience led me to then give a try to the Huntington Beach SOFT no. 1 putter, which has also been a great pickup. However, at the higher asking price for these new putters above, I probably would have gone with a new Ping Sigma 2 or something similar instead, given the similar price. I’m a newfound Cleveland fan and wish them
      success, but at this price I fear they have danger of
      moving out of their customer sweet spot that I stumbled into. I hope I’m wrong, often am, and to be sure, Cleveland doesn’t need my advice

      Reply

      Brett

      5 years ago

      Come on Cleveland, only one lefty model????

      Reply

      Chris

      5 years ago

      Agreed…when are these golfing companies going realise that there are almost as many lefties these days as righties…we are a market too!!!

      Reply

      Leftienige

      5 years ago

      About 12 years ago I was on holiday in San Francisco ,.I went into a HUGE golf-store . Of all their stock, they had just one L/H club , a used Yonex driver .When asked why they claimed the L/H markey was less than 15% , not worth bothering with . I kept my $900 in my pocket .

      Will

      5 years ago

      Cleveland has produced some very nice, reasonably priced putters for years; going up to the $200 range is questionable. Used a VP1 milled blade, HB1 is also nice & they weren’t $200. Want a real nice feeling putter, shop around for a Tad More, TM-30 milled; uses a soft aluminum insert; probably find one on eBay. Ping Anser TR-5 is nice too, but price is higher…

      Reply

      Bubba

      5 years ago

      No centre shaft options then. Did they say why?

      Reply

      THETaderSalad

      5 years ago

      This. I would strongly be considering one of they offered the Elevado with CS.

      Reply

      Steve

      5 years ago

      Same. A center shaft option would be nice. The offset of the other putters puts weight behind the plane of the shaft.

      For me, I have discovered that the more the weight that is back in the club, the more I “naturally” twist the club open. The worst being an Evnroll ER9 or Betti BB55. So to the idea of weight to the outside of the club, but not back appeals to me.

      The reason for center shaft is that it allows more of the weight in front of the shaft, like a few SeeMore blade putters with a solid relatively heavy steel face.
      Too bad.

      joro

      5 years ago

      This Putter stuff is laughable. In the old days we have Putters with flat faces and most good players did not use a cover so the Putter got pretty beat up, Then all of a sudden they, whoever they are said you had to have a perfectly flat milled face to be successful, oh yea, and keep a cover on it so it doesn’t get scratched. Also inserts became popular followed by grooves that said the Ball rolled better, and now the faces of Putters have all kinds of grooves and designs on them and cost more than I paid for my first set of Pro Line clubs including a Kangaroo Bag and an Otey Chrisman Putter I loved. Now I use a Rife 2 Bar Putter that rolls the Ball better than any of the new stuff, so Marketing is what it is, like clothes and Cars, change the design, and market the Hell out of it, then laugh all the way to the Bank. In Putting, some can and some can’t and that is the bottom line. Good luck with that.

      Reply

      Scott

      8 months ago

      Thanks for that, Old Tom Morris

      Reply

      Stephen DiBari

      5 years ago

      I’ve been using an Evnroll ER2 since March 2017 and I’ve never putter better especially on longer putts (over 10 feet). The groove design is amazing and how it compensates for energy loss on off center hits across the face ! Really shines on those 15-30 foot putts. I find myself with 3 footers or less on those long putts. Recently Had a Stability shaft installed and they gave me 44 degrees of toe hang which is 2x the OEM. AWESOME since I have a strong arc stroke.

      These Cleveland putters are interesting. Would definitely like to see a head similar to the ER2 or a mid mallet. Would be possibly worth giving a shot, but after dropping $200 on the Stability shaft hard to drop more $ on another putter

      Will wait for MSG to test !!

      Reply

      G.SE

      5 years ago

      Srixon/Cleveland have been on a roll this past year starting with the new 85 lineup/rtx 4. Irons always got the praise at Srixon but now everything is top notch and same with Cleveland with there wedges. I do believe the cbx wedges are absolutely a game changer with the innovation-design in a class of their own. Just so easy to hit whatever I need to with confidence. They also have been putting out some great putters for a couple of years now imo.

      Currently playing the s.o.f.t 8.5 and doing alright with it. The distance control works just as intended. This new design definitely makes sense math wise plus it’s something I struggle with so any help keeping it straight will be a big positive. Should be great in combination with the face tech that’s already there. Do appreciate the Srixon/Cleveland updates and articles here at Mgs. It’s how I got turned on to their products along with the balls a couple years ago. Great write up so thanks again.

      Reply

      Eye4golf

      5 years ago

      I have been a blade putter user for 50+ years and really liked the Huntington Beach #8 two years ago. Playing on big greens I was still leaving too many long putts on track but short enough to 3 putt. Watching so many pros on all tours using some kind of mallet and we’re making more putts. Saw a 2135 RHO being discontinued and tried it and the rest is history (made 5 in a row from 10 ft). What sold me was black paint that stands out against the pewter color the width of ball which has really helped me on my alignment. There is a white site line, but for me I prefer the wider Matt black area that suites my eyes better. I am also a straight back straight thru putter and it’s face balanced. Giving some consideration to the Stability Putter shaft for a upgrade to keep it more square at impact, Hope price drops from $199. No mention of these by Cleveland or any putters but robot shows twisting with old technology metal putter shafts. To me this part of the better putting puzzle is most critical. Curious if anyone has tried the stability putter shaft by Breakthrough Technologies?

      Reply

      shortside

      5 years ago

      My season to date with the flatstick has been erratic. As all of my putters are clearly broken I will be trying these on their release date. ;-)

      Reply

      Jack B

      5 years ago

      Will Cleveland be doing a recall of their TFi 2135 lineup?

      Reply

      cksurfdude

      5 years ago

      OK, I’m ready to run out and buy one! ;-)

      …depending on the results of the upcoming (?) MGS testing, especially vs Evnroll.

      Thanks for covering this, it does look interesting.

      Reply

      John Barry

      5 years ago

      Looking for a new putter and I can’t wait to try these, will even be in Myrtle Beach when I do at the PGA Superstore!

      Reply

      fifteenclubs

      5 years ago

      So it’s basically just the Carbite putter from 20 years ago? Lol.

      Reply

      Vic

      5 years ago

      Like the efforts Cleveland Golf is making to be competitive for increased market share. Tried one a couple of years ago but went back to Odyssey in fact just traded my O Works Rossie II in for an Odyssey O works with the Microhinge insert. But I certainly will watch for the MGS testing on this putter line in the future.

      Reply

      Rob.M

      5 years ago

      Thank You Cleveland Golf! About 2 years ago premium putters went from a high of about $199.00 to over $349.00! I can’t wait to try one of Cleveland” new “Frontline” putters with some “real” technology built in at a “real” price point!

      Reply

      David B

      5 years ago

      I’m confused.

      “Cleveland found that on a 20-millimeter mishit (about an inch off-center), the blade will be about a half-degree offline, while the mallet will be about two-degrees offline.” To me, this is another way of saying that blade putters are more accurate than mallets because they twist less? I don’t believe science supports that.

      The biggest problem I have with these putters is with the three different elements on the face. The milled portion in the middle is aluminum. The weights on the ends are tungsten. Between those two surfaces are parts of the frame (steel?). I assume each of those three metals has different hardness and therefore different rebound characteristics, correct? Therefore, depending on where on the face the putter contacts the ball, you’re going to get at least three different rebound characteristics and perhaps even direction, correct (even more if the face strikes the ball partially on the bar, partially on the tungsten portion and partially on the aluminum portion)?

      I appreciate Cleveland trying to differentiate itself by combining cutting edge tech with moderate price, but this “Frontline” proposition sounds like “alternative facts” to me.

      Reply

      Brandon

      5 years ago

      If you miss the insert entirely that putt has no business going in the hole.

      Reply

      Stephen DiBari

      5 years ago

      Exactly, if you can’t strike the insert you need more help than this putter !! ?‍♂️

      Reply

      Rocco DelGado

      5 years ago

      He’s right. He is confused…

      Reply

      Jcosta

      5 years ago

      Seriously? Are you suggesting someone can’t hit the significantly sized insert on this outter? Then they should bag it and take up bowling!

      Reply

      Niro

      5 years ago

      Definitely spotted these and had to second look at them. It’s cutting edge technology by Cleveland and one that I like because of the price compared to some of the other options out there.

      Reply

      Paul

      5 years ago

      I’m willing to give it a go! Sadly, a true fitting for a putter is difficult to find, and even Club Champion’s process with SAM is severely lacking as they don’t carry quantities of putters! So, one can get an eval done, but usually can’t get the putter one is fitted to in their hands. I just can’t go off-the-rack for a club I would take almost 1/2 my strokes with.

      But, I’ll try them when I see them!

      Reply

      Steve S

      5 years ago

      Interesting concept. I get the physics and the trig; not sure that “in real life” how much difference it will make. I’ve been working on my putting forever. Reading breaks is my biggest issue. Not sure I’ve hit a putt 1″ from the center on anything 20 feet or less in years.

      Reply

      Bens197

      5 years ago

      Science is cool. A sub $200 putter with all this R&D could easily sell for $300 if it were another brand. I’m in.

      Reply

      jlukes

      5 years ago

      Looks like Cleveland is finally using some of the technology from the old Never Compromise TDP line

      Reply

      Tom Duckworth

      5 years ago

      They look good I was looking at the Elevado pictures wishing it came with a slant
      Neck and as I read down there it was. Cleveland has been making solid putters for some time now. I have been thinking about changing to that style of putter for some time now and Cleveland seems to have ticked all the boxes I would like.
      I’m open to testing one if you would like. I don’t mind at all.

      Reply

      Kyle Worthy

      5 years ago

      Cool idea, but those are some Ugly looking putters.

      Reply

      Tider992010

      5 years ago

      I saw these in the weekend and was intrigued. Now that I’ve read a little on them consider me very interested. I putted with the Fang type Elevado and it felt great. Keep it coming Cleveland.

      Reply

      John

      5 years ago

      Isn’t this the same technology that Evnroll uses in their putters? Basically, if you hit it offline a little, it will still find the hole?

      Used an Evnroll for a while and thought it helped my putting, but later switched to the Stroke Lab One because I found that making a good putt requires more than technology… try lots and lots of practice.

      Reply

      Brandon

      5 years ago

      Slight difference, the Cleveland face aims to have the ball roll the same distance across the insert because of the milling while the weighting is supposed to make the club head twist less to start off center strikes closer to the intended line. The EVNROLL milling does the same for distance but also incorporates side spin to bring the ball back to the intended line. There is no weights to move CG forward or other design aspects to reduce face twisting.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Wedges
    Apr 16, 2024
    Vokey WedgeWorks Low Bounce K Grind Wedge
    News
    Apr 16, 2024
    It Was A Masters To Forget For LIV Golf
    Golf Apparel
    Apr 16, 2024
    adidas Pioneers Next Generation of Lightweight Golf Garments
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.