First Look – Miura CB-301 Irons
Irons

First Look – Miura CB-301 Irons

First Look – Miura CB-301 Irons

Miura’s release of the CB-301, its first fully forged cavityback iron since the PP9003 in 2011, offers golfers something more than an updated look at an evolved design. It also hints at where Miura might be headed as the brand continues to find its footing in North America amidst the organizational restructuring, which started roughly two years ago. 

The fear for some Miura loyalists was that by increasing exposure and working to make the brand more globally competitive, it would begin to stray from its roots as a small family run operation in Himeji, Japan where the message of Discover Perfection suggested something of an exclusive destination. Multi-piece constructions such as the PP-9005 (Genesis) didn’t do much to quell the nervous feelings.  

That said, the CB-301 should offer some measure of solace as other than the design work (done by Shinei the son of founder Katsuhiro Miura) the story is relatively similar to that of previous players irons (CB-57, MB-001, MC-501). Each head is forged at the Miura facility in Himeji from soft 1025 carbon steel, and according to Miura “is individually handcrafted and will never be mass produced” – However, it’s reasonable to question where the line exists separating increased market share from mass production. Is it possible for Miura to access the former without running the risk of the latter?  

In terms of performance, Miura claims the CB-301 to be the longest forged cavityback iron it’s ever produced, which is noteworthy as it’s rare to hear Miura leverage distance as a selling point for a forged iron. Given its construction, Miura hopes the CB-301 will appeal to a broader range of players, some which may look to combo the CB-301 with more workable MC-501 short irons. That said as a complete set, the basic structure (lower and deeper CG and scooped-out rear cavity), might remind golfers of the 2018 Players Distance Most Wanted winner (Fourteen TC 788).  

The CB-301 is positioned as a bridge seeking to connect Miura’s next generation of designers with a more universal audience, though at $280/club it’s still by most measures a niche product.  

Miura built a dedicated following on a foundation of high-quality forged player’s irons and wedges. No doubt, nearly a decade between releases is well beyond the industry norm.  

So, did Miura get it right?  

For more information, visit www.Miuragolf.com.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris is a self-diagnosed equipment and golf junkie with a penchant for top-shelf ice cream. When he's not coaching the local high school team, he's probably on the range or trying to keep up with his wife and seven beautiful daughters. Chris is based out of Fort Collins, CO and his neighbors believe long brown boxes are simply part of his porch decor. "Isn't it funny? The truth just sounds different."

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      william

      5 years ago

      I think the pp 9005 was the sons design..lets hope that when he takes over the company he doesn’t stray too far from what makes miura unique and one of the best. I mean those were hideous and should never have been made imo.

      Reply

      iMike74

      5 years ago

      It would be very interesting to see how these compare to the PP-9003 mentioned. The PP-9003 were at the time marketed (to the extent Miura marketed back then) as friendly and forgiving and an iron suitable also for players with a mid handicap. This cavity looks fairly similar. The questions is if there is more “tech” aimed at being forgiving, such as sole grind, top line and offset. Hard to tell from the pictures.

      Reply

      iMike74

      5 years ago

      Looking at the pictures on their website the top-line seems fairly thin, but there also seems to be a bit of offset. And the lofts are strong so I assume that the sole and CG-optimization they mention are aimed at getting the ball up in the air despite low lofts. It would be VERY interesting with a comparison to PP-9003. If not a full “head to head” test, at least some comments from someone who have used both.

      Reply

      Jordan Wear

      5 years ago

      Those are beautiful. Yes they are very expensive but I’d rather spend the money on these irons than the new furnace I’m putting in as I write this… stupid polar vortex?

      Reply

      Fernando

      5 years ago

      Like Miuras, but this don’t do much for me.
      Would love more info on the Kyoei KK MB irons performance. I am obsessed with their look

      Reply

      chemclub

      5 years ago

      Bah, I meant you can see design elements of the pp9003 in this head!

      Reply

      chemclub

      5 years ago

      Love the look of this iron. I feel like you can definitely see the PP9003 intros head.

      Reply

      Mozgolf

      5 years ago

      Don’t do much for me. Just looks like a 90s cavity back iron to me

      Reply

      Lmatteo

      5 years ago

      Looks alot like the old Titleist DCI Black Diamond, only with a notch added? Witch I thought was one of the best clubs I ever played at the time, during my time as an assistant pro in South Florida. But, at $280/club I will have to pass on the set for now! Being in that program spoiled us due to the great discounts we use to get.

      Reply

      Brad

      5 years ago

      That’s because there hasn’t been that much advancement in irons since the 90s. In fact, if you take a Ping Eye 2 and put it up against a modern iron of equivalent loft (ignoring the # stamped on the sole), the numbers would look almost identical. The only improvements you would find in the modern iron might be better looks and feel/sound, and slightly better performance on off-center hits.

      The main areas of improvement in golf clubs since the 90s have been in metal woods and the replacement of long irons with more forgiving hybrids by many golfers. Improvements elsewhere are marginal and mostly in the area of looks and feel. Oh, and marketing. Lots of marketing….

      Reply

      Simms

      5 years ago

      I like the Marketing statement, just pulled out a Golf Digest from 2014 and it was fun to read all the ads talking about the GREAT new clubs….all on ebay for a few dollars in 2019…

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.