First Look: Srixon Z 585/785/U85 Irons
Irons

First Look: Srixon Z 585/785/U85 Irons

First Look: Srixon Z 585/785/U85 Irons

You can make a compelling case that the Srixon-Cleveland equipment lineup – from top to bottom – is as strong as any in the game. From one end of the bag to the other, Srixon-Cleveland offers a  choice for everyone from a high handicapper looking for as much help as possible to the scratch looking for a sex-on-a-stick blade.

Srixon’s two-year-old 565 and 765 irons were both top performers in past MyGolfSpy Most Wanted testing and are favorites among MGS readers and staff. Despite their performance and popularity, the sand in the old hourglass has run out for both, and golf’s product calendar says it’s time for an update.

We shared our First Look at Srixon’s new Z 85 metal woods yesterday, an upgrade Srixon considers revolutionary compared to its previous models, When it comes to irons, however, the Srixon brand is traditionally more evolution than revolution. Incremental change is the phrase they use, and the new Z 585 and Z 785 irons sets, while not radically different than their high-performing predecessors, do bring a few interesting upgrades to the party that are sure to turn a few heads.

Ch-ch-changes

Whenever an OEM unveils an upgrade, it’s always fair to ask if it’s an improvement or if it’s just a change to satisfy the calendar and to sell something new. The cynics, of course, will say it’s nothing more than a marketing-fueled money grab. Generally speaking, however; companies on two-year product cycles view their new releases as part of a product continuum: each iteration featuring performance enhancements the OEM believes will provide golfers with an incrementally better stick.

Or, as Robert Browning once wrote, “A man’s reach should exceed his grasp, or what’s a Heaven for?

The upgrades to the Z 585s and  785s are subtle and, in Srixon’s own words, incremental. The 585s have evolved into a bit of a category buster: they’re the most Game Improvement-y irons in Srixon’s lineup, but wouldn’t be out of place in the new Player’s Distance category. Comps include Mizuno’s JPX 900 Forged, Callaway’s Apex CF 16 (or whatever replaces it) and Titleist’s AP2.

The Z 785’s are Srixon’s next generation forged, cavity back player’s iron – a refinement of the popular Z 765. Comps include the Titleist 718 CB, Wilson Staff FG Tour V6 and Mizuno MP 18, among others.

“They’re two great feeling, great looking irons,” says Srixon Marketing Director Brian Schielke, not unexpectedly. “Compact, thin top line. The 585s are more about feel and distance, the 785s more about feel and control.”

And both, when Srixon’s updated Utility irons are added to the mix, can make for some unique combo sets.

Feel With Added Distance

The Z 565 was MyGolfSpy’s Most Wanted Game Improvement Iron for 2017 – it featured a forged 1020 carbon steel head with a high strength SUP10 steel face. Not for nothing, so does the new Z 585.

So where’s the beef?

It’s in the groove. Speed Groove, that is.

“Imagine the face of a big trampoline with spring around the outside,” says Schielke. “What we’ve done is milled out a little channel around the perimeter, making the face more flexible, so you get a little more ball speed.”

Face flexibility is the thing in distance irons, and every OEM has its own take on it. More face flex over a wider area of the clubface helps reduce distance loss on mishits and maximizes direct hits. Feel, however, can be a problem in this category (Urethane Microspheres, anyone?), so Srixon is trying to mitigate that with a black material covering the Speed Groove.

“Some distance irons are clicky,” says Schielke. “These have that soft material surrounding the high strength face, which absorbs a lot of the vibrations.”

The 3- through 7-irons feature a full Speed Groove that circles the entire cavity back, while the 8- and 9-irons have a sole groove only. The PW and SW have no groove.

The soft, black dampening material raised quite a stink a couple of months ago when we showed early pictures of the 585s from the USGA Conforming website. Quite frankly, those shots made the club look awful. In person, while they may not be everyone’s cup of tea, the 585s do appear a bit more refined – maybe not quite as clean as the 565, but beauty, as they say, is in the eye of the golfer. If you’re the type who spends time every day gazing at your clubs as they sit in the bag waiting for you to take them out to play, and a black outline just isn’t your thing, the look may put you off. On the course, if you’re looking at the back of the club while swinging, you’re doing it wrong.

Of greater import, do Speed Grooves work? Srixon’s own internal testing suggests there’s something there. Comparing 7-iron ball speeds with the JPX 900 Forged and the Titleist AP2, Srixon tells us – not surprisingly – the 585 out ball-sped the Mizuno by just over 1 MPH, and the Titleist by nearly 4 MPH. As always, consider the source.

After a few rounds and range sessions we can say when it comes to feel, the Speed Grooves perform as advertised: the 585s are an excellent feeling iron. Distance-wise, they’re certainly not lacking. MyGolfSpy will be running its own tests to compare against the rest of the field.

Srixon’s unique V.T. Sole has been adjusted just a wee bit for the 585, as well. It’s slightly wider compared to the 565 to improve turf interaction, an attribute at which the 565’s already excelled.

Workability and Feel

Cosmetically, Srixon didn’t do much at all to the Z 785, which is probably a good thing. The 765 was a pretty sweet looking iron, and its progeny is as well. The 785 is still forged from a single billet of 1020 carbon steel, but there are a couple of functional tweaks.

“There’s a little more material behind the ball to help feel,” says Zack Oakley, Srixon’s brand manager. “It’s right in the middle, and that’s where the better players are supposed to be striking it. It aids in workability so that you can move it around a little easier than before.”

That extra material adds a little oomph to the club, as well. Srixon says its staffers are picking up some yards with the 785s, while achieving a higher ball flight and a steeper landing angle.

In addition, shaping has been adjusted just a tad. It’s a wee bit more compact than the 765, with a slightly sharper topline. The V.T. sole has also been tweaked – with a little bit more leading-edge bounce.

“The Tour guys love it,” says Schielke. “They feel they can hit down as hard as they want, and it just cuts through the turf. And for people who do hit a fraction behind the ball, it maintains more speed through the turf. So rather than coming up short of the green, you’ll maybe make the front of the green on a mishit.”

Srixon is not coming out with a new blade at this time, and the 2016 Z 965 blade is not currently listed on Srixon’s website.

As we said earlier, Srixon is enthusiastically promoting the idea of combo sets with the new Zs. The 585 and 785 are pretty close in terms of face shape and size – the biggest differences are the sole width, the perimeter, and the back cavity design. Despite the black Speed Groove material on the 585s, the clubs don’t look mismatched in the same bag, and spec-wise, you could say they combine by design.

And if you want to jazz up your combo set, Srixon is updating – and expanding – it’s Utility iron.

#1 on Tour

Srixon’s Z U65 Utility irons are the number one utility iron on Tour, a ranking of which Srixon is justifiably proud.

“Most of our staffers have one or two in play,” says Schielke. “They’ll play a practice round or a regular round with someone who’s a non-staffer, and the next day that non-staffer will be in our Tour trailer asking us to build one for him.”

The U65 has been popular at retail, too, to the point where Srixon simply can’t keep them in stock.

Again, if it’s so good, why mess with it?

Well, more options for your combo set, for one.

“We’ve designed both irons sets and the new Z U85 Utility irons for progressive sets,” says Oakley, “to make it easy to mix and match.” The U85s do carry a higher price tag – by $58 per stick – compared to the 585/785s, so more Utility irons in the bag means a higher price tag (depending on your Utility to Hybrid ratio). At $199, the Srixon’s are a full $50 less expensive than TaylorMade’s GAPR, and Callaway’s X Forged Utility.

The U85 features full hollow-body construction, with the same 1020 forged head and SUP10 high strength steel face as the 585 irons. Compared to the U65s, the U85s have a wider sole and a deeper Center of Gravity.

“Full hollow construction is the in thing now,” says Oakley. “It lets you bring the CG down to get the ball up, especially in the 2- and 3-irons, where getting the ball up is more important than anything.”

“You can do some things with the weighting that aren’t visible,” adds Schielke. “It looks like a blade but has the performance and forgiveness of a cavity back.”

To add to your combo set options, Srixon is offering the U85s in 2-iron through 6-iron. The U65s were available on 2, 3 and 4 only. For example, if you’re looking for distance and forgiveness, you could combine the 4, 5 and 6 U85 utilities with the 585s in 7-PW, or you could combine the 4 through 6 Utilities with the 785s for workability and forgiveness, or you could piece together a mixture of Utilities, 585s and 785s. Srixon is making a wide array of no upcharge shafts available, to make mixing and matching that much easier.

“We really don’t know how many utility irons we can sell,” admits Schielke. “That’s because we’ve sold through our inventory over the last two years. We’re trying to forecast better for this model.”

Might we see a full set of hollow-body irons from Srixon anytime soon? Schielke didn’t say yes, but then again, he didn’t say no, either.

“We’re definitely considering it.”

Options, Pricing, and Availability

The Srixon Z 585 irons are available in 3-iron through AW, and a 7-piece set sells for $999 in steel, $1,199 in graphite. The stock steel shaft is the Nippon Modus3 105; stock graphite is the Miyazaki Kuala. The Golf Pride Tour Velvet 360 is the stock grip.

The Z 785 is also available in 3-iron through AW, with the same $999 price for a 7-piece set. The Nippon Modus3 120 is the stock shaft (there’s no stock graphite offering), with the same Tour Velvet 360 grip.

The Z U85 Utility will be available in 2- through 6-iron, with the UST Recoil 95 and the Tour Velvet stock. It will sell for $199.

Srixon is offering an aggressive list of no upcharge shaft options for the entire lineup, including Nippon’s Pro Modus3 and Pro 950 lines, the Dynamic Gold, Dynamic Gold Tour Issue, the DG 105 and DG 120 as well as the True Temper AMT Black and Tour White. KBS Tour, Tour 90, Tour V, Tour FLT, C-Taper, C-Taper, $-Taper and the 560 and 580 Junior Shafts are also no upcharge options, as are the Project X, Project X PXi, and Project X LZ. The Recoil 95, Recoil SMACWRAP and Steel Fiber 95’s are graphite options.

Just as aggressive is the no upcharge grip selection, which includes pretty much every grip Golf Pride, Lamkin and Winn offer.

You can preorder the new Z series irons at selected retailers and on Srixon’s website now and will be available at retail starting September 14th.

For You

For You

Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
Buyer's Guides
Apr 12, 2024
Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
First Look
Apr 12, 2024
Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
News
Apr 12, 2024
PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John is an aging, yet avid golfer, writer, 6-point-something handicapper living back home in New England after a 22-year exile in Minnesota. He loves telling stories, writing about golf and golf travel, and enjoys classic golf equipment. “The only thing a golfer needs is more daylight.” - BenHogan

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

Shot Scope V5 Golf Watch
Apr 3, 2024 | 14 Comments
Driver Shopping Do’s and Don’ts
Mar 29, 2024 | 5 Comments
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Adam Huckeby

      6 years ago

      Mygolfspy,

      Guys I’ve been avidly following all of your stuff for years now. These new release ” first looks” are always of interest to me. They contain much of what I would expect and even some insights I might not have thought to consider. That said, I would like to make a friendly request/suggestion. One thing that you posted this year, I believe in the “First Look” article on the Mizuno iron line coming out, were blade length and sweet spot specs for the Mizuno line vs some competitive product. The sweet spot size information is fine but the blade length information is of particular interest to me. In looking at irons I prefer a short blade length and a low toe, 2 measurements that, at least to my knowledge, are hard to come by. If there were a phase-gate process to club buying these measurements would be key factors in getting past “discovery” and moving through the first gate on to consideration and eventual purchase.

      At any rate, I could bloviate further but keeping this to less than a page……I’d love to see heel to toe measurement, topline thickness, and perhaps toe height be a standard added to the list of specifications listed for new/ pre-release irons. These numbers aren’t readily available anywhere else except in rare cases where companies like TM make the Heel to toe part of the brand of each iron line. Not sure if publishing these crosses and proprietary lines but if it were possible…you get the idea.

      anyway

      thanks for the time

      A

      Reply

      michael agishian

      6 years ago

      I just got fitted at club champion and these z585 were the clear best club head for me. Even the couple misses were still good. Had a average of 165 with a1.42 smash on the 6i Finally getting out of my Costco Callaway extreme starter set.

      Reply

      Dave cole

      6 years ago

      I am excited for Srixon. I think these new irons and woods are going to continue to see a positive trend in their direction. Willing to bet a set of hollow body irons are next for Srixon. Watch out Titleist, Taylormade, and Callaway there is a new leader of the pack coming for ya!

      Reply

      cksurfdude

      6 years ago

      Sweeeeeet! Wondering if I’m good enough (yet) to try the U85 as a long iron replacement (which for me would be the 5). Tried the Ping Crossover and was ok-ish with it but not totally crazy about it. Hmmmmmmmmm.

      Reply

      KM

      6 years ago

      Srixon is the old Dunlop company, they have always made good equipment.

      Reply

      JonD

      6 years ago

      Incremental is the key word here.

      Every year I go out and try the flavor of the year iron hoping to find one that performs more than just marginally incremenatally better than my 2006 Taylormade R7XDs.

      Haven’t found any that come even close to matching up with their marketing hype.

      Sure I’ve found a few that may go 1 or 2 yards further maybe a few feet higher. But breakthrough performance hype is just that.

      A lot of hype.

      For the last several years club improvement has largely been a fairytale.

      A few years ago I hit the P400s. Supposed to be two clubs further and one club higher.

      Tried them not even close.

      I guess if they were comparing their clubs to 1969 Spaldings maybe the marketing hype isnt hype but against everything that has been manufactured in the last dozen years it is all BS.

      I am to the point that the OEMs have been crying wolf for so long that at this point it is probably a waste of time to keep trying.

      However I will continue to try to find something that gives me more that a virtually insignificant incremental advantage ove what I play.

      Hope I find something but at this point I am not holding my breath.

      Reply

      Stevegp

      6 years ago

      I am a big fan of Srixon gear. Good stuff! I play a Srixon driver and Z Star balls. Thanks for the interesting and informative article. Can’t wait to see and demo the Z585s irons.

      Reply

      scott

      6 years ago

      The Z585 look great to me and would love to try them out. When Ping came out with the Karsten, Ping eye & II then the plus and Zings to me I couldn’t hit them because in my minds eye they were bulky and hugely looking but they put them on the map .

      ” A pretty swing can make a huge club go farther then a huge swing playing with a pretty club. “

      Reply

      Curt

      6 years ago

      Playing 545’s and no-way am I buying the 585’s. The black in the cavity is just horrible for me. Gonna have to go with the 785’s, if I buy at all.

      How hard is it to understand in the looks department – forged blades are the standard and although some folks want some help, they still want the looks of uniform forged steel – NOT contrasting colors.

      Reply

      stephenf

      6 years ago

      You said it. Cf. the Wilson forged irons they’ve been putting out starting with the V2s (V6s are some improvement in looks, I guess, but still). Pretty much universally praised as great performers, excellent feel, good-to-excellent look at address, but I don’t see how in the world anybody signed off on those backs. I doubt I’ve met one person in 20 who doesn’t hate the look of the backs.

      Reply

      Tom Duckworth

      6 years ago

      I get why they made the black line bigger in the 585 but it still looks bad. I wish they made it silver so it would blend in and they could do without the little pattern. I don,t think they blend as well with the 7 series. I like the cleaner looks of my 565s I’m sure they still perform well.

      Reply

      Gary Wright

      6 years ago

      Hi, does anybody have an opinion on how these would fare against Hogan irons? I have 565/765 irons but I’m in Aberdeen, Scotland and we don’t have access to Hogan goods.

      Thanks

      Reply

      808nation

      6 years ago

      Great article JB, I am liking all the new offerings from Srixon. My initial thoughts when looking at their prototype models, the 585 did look awful IMHO. But, the more I look at the 585’s it looks great with the exception of the graphics in the center of the head. The 785 and U85’s look awesome as well and I can’t say enough for the new drivers. Would definitely need to visit my local golf store when it hits the stores and compare them with my 565’s.

      Michael

      6 years ago

      I agree. The z565 are the best irons I’ve ever owned. The new ones look thick, awkward and overly flashy. Hopefully my z565’s last forever, or until I accidentally click ‘checkout’ on the Hogan website.

      Reply

      Tainer6

      6 years ago

      Good article, per usual, John… I couldn’t help the feelings of deja vu as I read. Anyone else see the striking similarity between the 585’s and JPX 825 Pro’s released circa 2013? Hidden perimeter/undercut cavity in mid & long-irons, black material in-fill on back, V.T. / Tri-Cut sole… heck I almost thought the article’s cover photo was a knockoff 825!

      (WARNING CONSPIRACY THEORY ALERT!!!) Piggy backing on the recent MGS inside Mizuno article (GREAT piece BTW) I was surprised to learn that Mizzy doesn’t have exclusive with the foundries doing its forging. Perhaps some intellectual capital slipped through the cracks????

      Never hit a Srixon… Sounds like I need to though… and be ready to add $1500 to my CC statement! Thanks as always for great, consumer first, content…

      Reply

      stephenf

      6 years ago

      Top line is insanely thick, but I guess everybody has to get used to a certain amount of that now. Sucks. I’m sure playability is excellent.

      The 7i speed-comparison chart — I’m hoping it’s from Srixon and is therefore promotional — does the usual ad-puffery thing where you don’t zero-base the chart (the numbers start at 101 mph), so your alleged speed looks at a glance like it’s 50-150% higher than the competitors, not 3-4% or less.

      Also, before anybody gets too lit up over that 3-4% or less, you’ll notice that the loft on the Srixon 7i is same as Titleist 6i, and one degree off same as Mizuno 6i. So let’s just stop with this “I hit 190-yard 7-irons all the time” stuff. It has a 7 stamped on it. If it were a Wilson FG-17 from the 1980s, it would be one degree off having a 5 stamped on it, with a shorter shaft.

      I don’t know why this matters so much to people. There’s something really adolescent about it, this “my generation hits it so much farther than those no-playing dogs who came before.” But boy, does it ever sell clubs.

      Reply

      Rob C

      6 years ago

      Yeah, if it were still the 80’s, I’d have hair and still be dunking a basketball. I wish you and others would actually listen to the R&D people as to why the lofts have changed, and how its’ still hitting the same launch window and decent angles, there’s much more to it than just the loft number. The get off my lawn…”jacked lofts” is a tired old rant that doesn’t hold water.

      Reply

      stephenf

      6 years ago

      Oh. I didn’t realize we were going to do a “f–k you, ignorant old-timer” thread. But since you’re into it:

      You can prattle on all you want about launch windows and “decent angles” and whatever, as if any of it made any difference whatsoever, and act like anybody who actually played the game at a high level in that era _and_ this one just doesn’t exist on the same plane of intelligence you do. It doesn’t change the basic fact that an iron of any given number designation is made to hit the ball significantly longer now than it used to be.

      It’s not that I don’t _know_ the arguments, explanations, etc., or that I haven’t “listened to the R&D people,” or even that I’m saying loft is all there is to it. In fact, you’re kind of making _my_ point here, which is that a combination of loft and other factors has led to very significant increases in distance with any given numbered iron, but that TV commentators, “golf writers” (most of them were general-sports crossovers who don’t know f-all about the game), and the majority of modern-era fans are always spewing nonsense about how the “greatest generation” (now) is so much longer and stronger. It’s just dumb to think you can rationally dismiss somebody calling that out as a “get off my lawn rant.” Unless, that is, you’re willing to make the ridiculous and easily disproven argument that the club-ball combination today _doesn’t_ go significantly farther for any given number-designated iron.

      The point is that 1) people are weirdly wrapped up in what the number on the iron is and whether they used the minimum number possible to cover a given distance, so much so that they’ll ruin their games in pursuit of that obsession (or rather, they’ll end up playing what amounts to a “look how long I am” game _other_ than golf, which is about scoring low); and 2) since increased length in the modern era is mostly a matter of changes in equipment, most of the noise about how much more awesomely long good players are now is meaningless, not to mention breathless (and worthless) fanboyism.

      It so happens that when I was in my mid-20s, I was at least top-third to top-quarter in distance with the driver among good players (pros and scratch-to-plus handicappers), with an old Penna persimmon. In my soon-to-be late 50s, with a chronic spinal condition that makes it impossible even on a good day for me to hit balls for more than about 15-20 minutes, and then only at reduced speed, I’ll hit it at least 30 yards longer with any driver from the past five or six years, and half a club to a club and a half longer with the irons, than I did 25 to 30 years ago when I was at peak strength. So it’s completely apparent to me just how meaningless this difference in distance is. It just shouldn’t happen with one single deteriorated person like this, who ought to be hitting it at least a club or two shorter right now, and 30 or 40 yards shorter with the driver. If you’re a good player who can generate any speed at all and you demo some of the better drivers out there now, you pretty much can’t touch the sweet spot at high center without hitting it 300 and up.

      This is, as you may know, a common experience among good players. A friend and frequent team-tournament partner of mine who was also a plus-handicapper once picked up a good 30-35 yards off the tee literally overnight by finally hitting on the right trial-and-error combination of factors with his driver. I saw it myself as it happened because at the time we were in practice rounds together regularly, and I played with him five days apart when this change happened. He told me he had found a head and put this particular shaft in it just two nights before, then had it on the practice round the day before we were playing. First thing I see is him driving the green on the 360-yard opening hole (downhill, but still). Once he adjusted his irons, he got a proportional difference there as well.

      He had always been really long — on any given day, I would have to be hitting it dead on the sweet spot to keep up with him, and getting within five to 10 yards was pretty good most of the time, even for other longish hitters like myself — but this was ridiculous. He was several years older than me, and when I saw him play in his early 50s he was driving it 340-plus hole after hole. I once saw him drive it 10 yards short of the green on a 430-yard par 4 that required a carry of at least 290 into a left-to-right quartering 12 mph headwind, over trees surrounding bunkers at the corner, then slightly downhill from there. Next hole was a 245-yard par-3, and he hits 3i to six feet (missed). Driver and 8-iron to a 570-yard par-5, quartering downbreeze, but not much wind. He shot 69 that day from the absolute tips of a championship-quality university course while missing absolutely everything, at least seven or eight birdie putts from six to 15 feet or so. (He had shot 66 there in the closing round of a tournament only a couple of months earlier.)

      The absolute length we’re talking about with him makes him an unusual example on the basis of degree, but the bigger point is that a few years before this he was only slightly longer than I was, sometimes not even that. But after a change in equipment, and a full decade later — even longer than that, actually — he was hitting it ungodly distances, longer than any good player I’d ever been around.

      So: It’s not that I think clubs should play shorter, or that there should be some law mandating lofts at specific number designations, or that I don’t understand or haven’t “listened to” R&D people. You can play a club with a 6 on it and a 21-degree loft if you want, and then you’ll be hitting a “6-iron” 230 yards, or whatever. What I’m objecting to is the adolescent mindset — which, for whatever reason, you dutifully adopted in your reply — that for some reason insists on reading some kind of “greatest generation” meaning into the absurd distances that are going on now and have been for some time.

      As to your dunking analogy, for that to work out here, you’d have to be talking about shoes that could make you dunk _now_, even more easily than you could then, and these shoes when worn by young players now, would make them “better” leapers than good players were 30 years ago, except they wouldn’t _actually_ be better.

      Not that there aren’t great players around now, just as there were 30 years or 60 years ago. Not even the point. Point is that increased distances are mostly to completely a result of equipment — loft being a critical component of that, whatever “windows” and “angles” we’re talking about — along with changes in the all-out-max-out-every-swing mentality that comes with the all-exempt tour and less penal courses. You take a good player, put stars in front of him when he’s young who are swinging from the heels on every swing, yammer at him endlessly about “torquing up” and whatever other max-out language you want to, set up courses so as not to embarrass the product on tour, then give him irons that are longer both loftwise and otherwise, and you’re going to get — shocker — competitors hitting longer 7-irons. This is not particularly remarkable, but there is no end to the remarks and the hype.

      Where this all gets really clear is when you start looking at average finishing distance from the hole is on approach shots from a given distance. Look at the Trevinos and Nicklauses on an old broadcast, write down the distances of every approach shot and the finishing distance from the hole, then compare it to the stats taken today and see what you get, even not accounting for the “aim at the flag on every shot” factor that came in with the all-exempt.

      stephenf

      6 years ago

      (Cut second “is” from first sentence of final graf of long reply. Obviously.)

      Rick Reed

      6 years ago

      Played the 745’s, and then got the 565’s. Best I’ve ever had with modus 105. 42 smash factor on track man. I’m not that good, but these clubs are. Can’t wait to try new driver.

      Reply

      Peter Jackson

      6 years ago

      Srixon, in my opinion, has some of the the very best golf products on the market. I prefer Srixon balls in particularly the Z ball to the well known brand leader. After using most manufacturers irons including Mizuno, I bought a set of Srixon Z565’s with graphite shafts from the US earlier this year. Without doubt they are beautiful looking but of more importance, they really perform. They are an iron longer than my previous irons, very forgiving and again in my opinion the softest, sweetest irons I have ever used. The bonus is that they are really forgiving.

      Reply

      strokerAce

      6 years ago

      Srixon/Cleveland has been just killing it the last couple years….add in the new drivers and pair them with the cleveland wedges and putters and MY GOODNESS!

      they may not be the most popular on tour but the SHOULD be the most popular off-tour….

      can’t wait to get my hands on a set!

      Reply

      seabass

      6 years ago

      any word on the 985?

      Reply

      JJVas

      6 years ago

      Moved from MB2s to the 545s after some back issues, and I only regret not doing it sooner. The 545s are workable either way, very forgiving, and great to look at. The 565s look identical, but I don’t like hearing that with the 585s they ramped up the distance (even more) with the 3i-7i. The best thing about the 545s is how consistent the distance is shot after shot. Yes, the lofts are super-strong, but I hit my 5i between 198-202y time after time after time. No trampoline to be found. I get that they had to do something with these outstanding irons, but it just tells me I’ll need to pick up a set of 565s next year on the cheap.

      Reply

      Mike

      6 years ago

      Try Dr John Bergman
      YouTube video on rehydrating docs in your back

      Reply

      Mike

      6 years ago

      Correction on previous message
      Back issues
      Rehydrating discs by Dr John Bergman
      Apologies

      Reply

      chemclub

      6 years ago

      I don’t think the 585’s are a bad looking club. Those utilities look sweet! Didn’t know they sold through on those models. Will definitely have to check them out as a DI to replace my hook-machine hybrid.
      As always, kept the 785 classic and sexy.

      Reply

      Michael

      6 years ago

      My 765s are starting to look very nervous in my golf bag. They must sense their days are numbered.

      Reply

      Berniez40

      6 years ago

      Great article on great irons. I switched from Mizuno JPX EZ’s to Srixon Z355’s and haven’t looked back. Fabulous super game improvement irons that allow a hacker like me to go pin-seeking. I can’t wait to try these 785’s. No I am not a shill–just a very happy Srixon guy who got turned onto them by My Golf Spy and an honest club fitter.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
    Buyer's Guides
    Apr 12, 2024
    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
    First Look
    Apr 12, 2024
    Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
    News
    Apr 12, 2024
    PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.