First Look: Wilson Staff D7 Irons
Irons

First Look: Wilson Staff D7 Irons

First Look: Wilson Staff D7 Irons

What would you say is the key difference between a Super Game Improvement iron and an iron in the emerging Players Distance category?

First, let’s look at the similarities. The SGI category promises forgiveness and distance for straighter, longer shots. Workability, of course, isn’t part of the equation. Players Distance promises distance and forgiveness for longer, straighter shots, with enough potential workability to make a better player swoon.

Seeing any common threads?

Put the two irons side-by-side and the biggest difference is obvious: one looks sleek, simple and, dare I say, sexy — the other looks like what better players disdainfully refer to as a shovel, with more bling than that one crazy aunt everyone has.

With today’s release of its new D7 irons, Wilson Staff is trying to bridge the gap between those two categories – by combining distance and forgiveness the SGI player needs with the clean looks a better player wants.

It’s a neat trick, but can that gap be bridged, or is it a bridge too far?

Meet The D7

There’s plenty of performance tech to talk about with the D7, but the most startling difference is its looks. D7 bears little, if any, resemblance to the 2-year-old D300, which it’s replacing.

“We have a strong history of what I’d call very bold and very red design elements,” says Wilson Golf Club Innovation Manager Jon Pergande. “Bold features denote forgiveness, but also chunkiness, with a heavy dose of red accents.”

The first thing you notice about the new D7 is the absence of bling. The second is an absence of red. Compared to its predecessor, D7 looks sleek, simple and sexy. The flashy red cavity decoration is gone, replaced with simple black and chrome, with a whisper of blue.

“The blue cools things off and makes it look a bit sleeker,” says Pergande. “But that sleekness is tied into the design. The D300 was very abrupt, with large features in the back, with Power Holes visible on the top line.”

The goal, says Pergande, was to create a cleaner, classier looking distance iron that could appeal to that Players Distance golfer looking for a little more forgiveness.

“We started by looking at the V6 and C300 Forged irons, products we’ve had great success with, and tried to work more of a traditional looking aesthetic,” he says. “So we’re losing the Power Holes on the topline and opening up the cavity a little bit to increase the MOI.”

Ahh, the Power Holes. From an aesthetic viewpoint, folks either ignore them, find them mildly irritating or loathe them entirely. Regardless, they’re gone from D7’s top line but are still used on the sole. There’s a Power Hole performance/tech story to be told, but at least half the D7 story is about curb appeal. Wilson wants it to wink at you from across the room.

Pick Me, Pick Me!

Even though the data says there’s no real correlation between looks and performance, when it comes to grabbing something off the shelf and giving it a whack or two on the launch monitor, we do like that eye candy.

“We’re trying to improve the initial consumer experience at the point of purchase, prior to testing,” says Pergande. “Part of that experience is a very clean shape. We wanted to keep the shape as clean as possible and hide the robustness and forgiveness for that better player’s eye.”

In that respect, Wilson’s done a pretty decent job. The D7 may not be the Kate Upton of irons, but it’s no Mimi from the Drew Carey Show, either. Getting rid of the top line Power Holes helps immensely. For an SGI iron the top line isn’t bad at all (a side-by-side comparison with the C300 Forged is below) and Wilson has done a nice job hiding the offset.

“The transition of hosel to leading edge is always tricky,” says Pergande. “These are distance clubs, and you want to have offset. It helps, especially in the longer irons. But as long as you transition the blends, you can hide the offset, and as long as you camber the topline a little, you can hide that width.”

“We think the market is shifting away from super-forgiveness looking and super chunky looking, and has moved into this much cleaner, more traditional look. I don’t want to associate D7 with a purely traditional look – it still has a large blade. But there are a lot of design cues that may improve the experiences for the better player, and maybe give him or her some added distance they may need for their game.” – Jon Pergande, Wilson Golf

The D7’s styling fits in nicely in Wilson’s iron continuum, with a family resemblance to the C300, C300 Forged, and FG Tour V6 (and maybe those sweet looking new blades), as well as the Super-Duper Game Improvement D350, for branding consistency, but with enough identity to stand on its own.

Putting the D in Distance

Wilson categorizes its iron sets as well as anyone in the business. D is for Distance, F (as in FG Tour V6 or FG Tour 100) is for Feel and C is for Crossover: more distance than the F’s, more feel than the D’s. Wilson’s very good at D, with both the D300 and D350 finishing at or near the top in both ball speed and carry distance in MyGolfSpy’s 2018 Most Wanted SGI iron test. Power Holes do their job.

Power Holes are Wilson’s way of creating more face-deflection, something virtually every iron-maker is doing in the quest for distance. The tech debuted in January of 2016 in the C200 iron, and Wilson has since added the technology to both the C and D series. The idea behind Power Holes? Disconnect the clubface from the head structure as much as possible, allowing the face to flex more at impact to maximize ball speed, no matter where on the face you hit it.

The top line Power Holes are gone, but Wilson is incorporating what it calls Progressive Power Hole technology on the sole, basically putting the power where you need it: three rows of Power Holes in the long irons (4-7), two rows in the 8- and 9-irons, and only one row in the Gap Wedge.

“Where do you need ball speed the most? For most players, it’s the long irons, the ones they struggle to hit the most,” says Pergande. “That’s where you need your distance advantage. People don’t need help hitting a pitching wedge farther. Besides, Power Holes don’t provide as much benefit on a more lofted club because the ball hits at such an angle.”

Previous Power Hole tech was known as FLX Face because Power Holes let the face flex. In the D7, however, Wilson is calling its ball speed tech something new: RE-AKT.

“It’s sort of an umbrella technology platform for the entire D7 series,” says Pergande. “Greater ball speed and higher MOI, so you get straighter shots that go farther. We also have the thinnest face we’ve ever had in an iron, and we do all that in a performance iron aesthetic.”

The Battle of the 7-Irons

If more on-the-shelf sex appeal is one key element of the D7, winning the battle of the 7-irons is the other.

“We’re putting a stake in the ground. We want to win with the 7-iron,” says Pergande. “The definitive consumer experience for 90% or more of golfers is the 7-iron. That’s the one you have for demo clubs; it’s where custom fit is usually centered and, generally speaking, it’s one of the longer clubs most players can hit comfortably.”

“So if we can make sure we have the best possible 7-iron experience for the consumer at his first contact, we’re going to do all we can to make that happen.”

Wilson isn’t short-changing the other clubs at the expense of the 7-iron. The 4, 5 and 6 have the same tech, but they figure the confluence of curb appeal, performance, and the club D series players use most is at the 7.

And you do have to give Wilson some credit for straight talk. Pergande says you’ll find the D7 roughly 5 yards longer than D300, but adds half of that is due to a slightly stronger loft structure, which is actually now more in line with others in the SGI world.

“It varies by clubhead speed, but you usually get an extra two-and-a-half yards per degree of loft increase. The rest is coming from the Power Holes and the club’s forgiveness.”

From an MOI standpoint, Wilson says the D7 features a roughly 10% increase in MOI over the D300, largely due to a change in the back cavity. The D300s featured large pods in the back cavity, towards the toe and heel.

“Those pods weren’t 100% filled with weight, and they weren’t putting weight toward the extreme perimeter of the club,” says Pergande. “It made the club look more forgiving, even though it’s not the most efficient use of weight.”

With D7, Pergande says that weight has been shoved more heel-ward and more toe-ward.

“When it comes to forgiveness, size rules the roost. The larger the (iron head), the more forgiveness will be in there. But once you establish a head size, it’s all about weight management.”

Price, Availability and Final Thoughts

MyGolfSpy has long suggested golfers should consider using the most forgiving club you can stand to look at. Wilson seems to have taken that to heart by giving the D7 a makeover – swapping the loud sportcoat for a black tie and tails. And while Wilson is trying to suggest D7 would be at home in the Players Distance category, the sole is still SGI-wide, and the blade is still SGI-long. Wilson’s choice of stock steel shaft – the KBS Tour 80 – is still SGI-centric.

Wilson has taken heat for the $499 price tag on the Driver Vs. Driver winning Cortex, so it needs to be noted the D7 will retail at $599 in steel and $699 in graphite (UST Mamiya Recoil is stock). That’s a full $200 price drop from D300’s original retail.

After a couple of range sessions, we can say the D7 is a worthy successor to the D300 (again, an excellent ball speed/distance performer in Most Wanted). Could it realistically bridge the gap between SGI and Players Distance? Well, at $599, an upgrade to a C-Taper, DG or any other stronger player shaft wouldn’t break the bank. If, that is, you think it’s a gap that needs bridging.

Wilson lists the KBS Tour, Tour FLT, Tour V and Tour 90 as no-upcharge options. A black Wilson-branded Lamkin grip is standard, and in keeping with the D7 austerity program, the logo and cap are in simple white, with no red or blue accents.

The D7 irons will be available at retailers and on Wilson’s website starting January 17th.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John is an aging, yet avid golfer, writer, 6-point-something handicapper living back home in New England after a 22-year exile in Minnesota. He loves telling stories, writing about golf and golf travel, and enjoys classic golf equipment. “The only thing a golfer needs is more daylight.” - BenHogan

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

Shot Scope V5 Golf Watch
Apr 3, 2024 | 14 Comments
Driver Shopping Do’s and Don’ts
Mar 29, 2024 | 5 Comments
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Scotty b

      3 years ago

      Just got mine at a smoking deal the look good play long and I’ve gotten more distance then my old set. I love the golf snobs comments but golf snobs are as bad as beers snobs, but it works for me and at a better price than most others brands. If your looking to gain some yards and save some $$$ have a look. Wilson for the win.

      Reply

      Vincent Dudley

      3 years ago

      Purchased D7 irons 2020 & performed as above expectations. Extremely high ball flight & two clubs longer than my old Taylormade set. The 5 iron was able to stop on hard greens due to the higher than normal ball flight. The off center hits still traveled a good distance. I was impressed with the playability when hooking around trees draws & fades around doglegs. The 6 iron was the best out of the rough for distance to the green. The timing of the swing took 2 weeks to get used to due to the weight difference & the speed of the club going through the grass. I now have more straight flying shots with longer carry. Would recommend theses clubs. I play with seniors that purchased new more expensive clubs & tried them. Found my clubs out performed the expensive clubs.

      Reply

      Foz

      3 years ago

      One year after I put my D7’s in play and they are still in the bag.

      Reply

      JM

      4 years ago

      I’ve been gaming these for a few months and they have tremendously helped my game. I started around a 24 handicap and now shooting in the low-mid 90’s. I can tell my mis-hits are being helped out by the forgiveness of these clubs. After a few lessons, I am really hitting these clubs well.

      Reply

      Paul M

      4 years ago

      I love these clubs just bought the SW to add to my set . I’m a 5 handicap that need the distance.

      Reply

      DG

      5 years ago

      I, like most people on the planet, am a very average golfer who hits a multitude of poor shots every single round. I love golf but I am not I love with a lot of things that surround. Snobbery, as illustrated in some of these replies, is one of the worst aspects. These are a well priced, well made club targeted at people like me who are not great a golf and need some help. To me it is absolutely immaterial what they look like, what brand they are, the lie, offset or not and I don’t even know what MOI is. When I hit the 7 iron it will go as far as it goes, same with any other club in the bad. It’s very little to do with the clubs, it’s the thing hanging on the end of them that make the difference. I absolutely guarantee you that I hit these clubs the same length and direction l, within a couple of yards, that I would with a set that cost 400 bucks more. Feel free to continue with “all the gear and no idea” ethos if it makes you happy. It won’t improve your game though. I does make me wonder why you are on THIS excellent site however…

      Reply

      BF

      5 years ago

      Well said. I’m a older 10 handicap and I’m considering these irons.

      Reply

      MattyMac

      5 years ago

      I don’t get why people get so upset and agitated over lofts and club numbers. Quite simply you buy some clubs that feel good and work for you, get on the range and measure the distance of each club. Now get on the course and hit the club for the desired length, who cares what’s written on the sole, its a pointless argument that I hear people bang on about. As for these clubs they are amazing, I’m an 11 handicap and can’t speak highly enough of these and the woods. Rather than jump on your keyboard get out there and hit them, a number is simply that and the only number that really counts is what’s written on the scorecard. Let’s lighten up and have some fun.

      Reply

      Gary Dulin

      5 years ago

      Are they strong lofted? Yes. Can you see a bit of the back up to the 7 iron? Yes. Do they look like shovels? No. I have the recoil shafts in these & they flie high(!) & far. The 5 iron just launches, easiest 5 iron I have ever hit. Look at as the 5 iron is lofted to an old 4 iron so goes 4 iron distance but so incredibly more easy to launch. Cannot say how happy I am with Wilson & the D7’s. & at a great price!!

      Reply

      Berniez40

      5 years ago

      I don’t want this to become a zombie thread lost in the sea of new B.S.and hype that is over whelming most of us right now as we get hit with a smal mountain of new releases. We already know that ” Everyone has the latest and greatest everytining.”
      While I await the latest MGS “Most Wanted…….(Fill in the Blank) of 2019” articles with bated breath, I have to throw a bone to Wilson Staff right now. Recently tried the new D7 Driver, and I personally got a lot more out of that old-fahshioned light weight fixed-hosel Driver than I got out of their new Cortex, or any of the other current crop of over-hyped $500+ drivers.
      The real irony of this and last years irons releases is the fact that the supposedly new Cally Rogue X Irons took a page right out of the Wilson Staff Book. Similar to Wilson’s old Di-9 irons, the lofts on the Rogue X Irons are so jacked up that they needed both an Attack Wedge and a Gap Wedge (Serious Di-9 Copy) just to get the gapping right between the 8 iron lofted Pitching Wedge and the Sand Wedge.
      I’m not dissing Cally for doing this, as I played a set of Di-9’s for several seasons and was grateful for their performance , but I am saying–“Please don’t sell this as something new just because you didn’t use a crumby piece of rebar called a ‘fat -shaft’ between the grip and the club head.”
      Besides I demoed the Rogue X and found them sorely wanting when using the synergy shaft. When upgraded to the Recoil Shaft my experience for both distance and feel was vastly improved. The New Wilson D7’s already sport the Recoil as a stock shaft. I am anxious to try them.

      Reply

      Jonny B

      5 years ago

      Hideous. Wilson should give up the golf equipment business.

      Reply

      P.J.

      5 years ago

      I’d be interested in seeing the gap distances between the irons. They start at 3* differences, but jump to 5* by the time you get to the wedges. It seems like you’d create some holes in your yardages that way. Thoughts?

      Reply

      Mark

      5 years ago

      I’m sorry, but I don’t see anything “sleek” or “sexy” about these irons. To each his own I guess.

      Reply

      charles thomas

      5 years ago

      what happened to the fg17 ? Great club for the better player.

      Reply

      Tom Wasley

      5 years ago

      I think Wilson has a winner in the D7’s. I tried them down here in FL last week at a demo day. They are clean looking and solid feeling at impact. I hit them high and straight. I normally have a slight draw but lost it with these irons. If straight appeals to you these might be your eureka moment.

      Reply

      Jerry Noble

      5 years ago

      We all know people who are more concerned about hitting a 7 iron while others are hitting a 5 or 6. I do not know anyone like that who is a very good golfer. They are always swinging out of their shoes in hopes of catching the sweet spot and hitting it long. But most of the time they mishit it and are short or they spray it left or right instead of swinging under control and hitting it straight. I said all of this to say I don’t want my 7 iron delofted so it goes like a 5 iron. I wish somehow there was a way that in order to put a 7 on the club it must have a certain loft.

      We have a guy at our club who will never hit enough club. If he needs an 8 iron he will take a pitching wedge, hood it down and over swing. If he gets it there it will be 10 or 20 yards to the left.

      Reply

      John of DC

      5 years ago

      Wilson isn’t doing anything other club makers aren’t doing with putting a 9 iron loft on a Pitching wedge, I have two playing partners one Taylormade and one Ping and both of their sets have irons that the loft were different than my Wilson, my 8 was their 9, my 9 was their pitching all the way through the set

      Reply

      Edmund Woronicz

      5 years ago

      Wilson is a minor player, can’t believe they’re still producing golf clubs. There are throwback from the Spalding, McGregor days. Non starter.

      Reply

      Don

      5 years ago

      That is a genuinely ignorant and un-informed reply and of no use to anyone. Maybe try them before you judge them. Im sure they outperform the PXG’s you likely have… :)

      Reply

      DG

      5 years ago

      Wow, you know very little about golf…

      Reply

      Jim Tyler

      5 years ago

      “Wilson” has the name, and if the product is a good one, golfer will gravitate to a properly priced, better product….testing will tell us as in the past – GOOD LUCK TO WILSON !!!!

      Reply

      Jim

      5 years ago

      Like a few other commenters here, I wish Wilson Staff clubs were more available for testing/fittings.
      I had my V6 irons at a one time only fitting in my area, and am extremely satisfied.
      I’ve played Wilson since Joe Philips was their detail man before being to Chicago and have always found their clubs to be the best for my game.
      I’d love to see them more available.

      Reply

      HDTVMAN

      5 years ago

      Wilson has had “great success” with certain products? Where? Bottom line to Mr. Innovation Manager, you need to get the product (1) into major golf retailers (2) into the hands of the club fitters (3) HUMAN TRAINING BY REPS. You need presence, you need club fitters who have been trained properly and will show the product to customers. Wilson’s Triton was a disaster, and it seems like the Cortex is not far behind. Our store received several, no demo, and the 2 customers who asked to hit one didn’t want it taped-up! Wilson owns a great name, “STAFF”…USE IT! D vs D1&2 were gimmicks, marketing ploys, which you don’t see the major players engaging in with their products. Ping, Callaway, TM, Titleist know how to market to both the fitter and customer. If you’re not interested in marketing, training, and working with me, then your best bet is to put your products in Walmart. Customer’s ask us what clubs we hit, what ball do we use, and what would we recommend. You need us.

      Reply

      Eric H.

      5 years ago

      I like them. I’m a fan of Wilson and like the idea of a better player’s looking iron with forgiveness. I’m a 14 handicap and need SGI but detest them looking like shovels. I’ve bought a couple and got rid of them and always go back to a more traditional looking iron. I would play these and I really like the simplified looks.

      Reply

      Dave B

      5 years ago

      Not ugly but I’ll stick with my 718 AP1s

      Reply

      DH

      5 years ago

      looking at these for my wife..either in womens or senior flex (shes 5’11 and 20 HC)..what shafts will be available in recoil?

      Reply

      Mike

      5 years ago

      WOW!!! A set of irons for less than $1000!! I only wish they had priced the new driver at a more reasonable level. Wilson can be a player if they can keep making reasonably priced clubs that perform. I will give them a try when I can get my hands on them.

      Reply

      joro

      5 years ago

      How reasonable to you want, the Driver is 299 and is the greatest. The Irons are 699 with the graphite and 599 with the KBS steel. And, who cares about the lofts, the bottom line then are long, high and accurate. The woods have the new Helium shaft and are great also. Try them before you knock them.

      Reply

      dick erdmann

      5 years ago

      These are decent looking sticks. Glad to see Wilson is trying to be what they used to be. I agree, it would be so much easier for club selection if the marketing hype would be toned down and the instruments themselves a bit more standardized (loft, length). Then let the real craftsmanship shine and do the selling.

      Reply

      stephenf

      5 years ago

      Anybody else remember the Wilson Reflex irons of the 1970s? I’m not positive about this, but I think they were the first ones out there making clubs based on this concept. (I was a kid and never even hit them later as used clubs, so I can’t say what they were like, but I do know the idea was distance by face-flex.)

      I doubt I’d ever play this kind of club, with the FG-62, the FG Tours, and the new prototype out there — I played forged Staffs almost exclusively for a competitive career — but I guess things might change once I get to the point where a loss in distance really starts to bother me. I thought it would’ve happened a long time before now, but it just hasn’t yet. I played some as a pro in my 20s and 30s, was probably in the top third or fourth among good players distancewise (forget the long-drive gorillas), and it never occurred to me that I could be hitting it as long loft-for-loft in my 50s as I was then, or even longer at times. Even with differences in the ball and technology it still seems a little surprising. But I also know that day is coming at some point when I’m hitting it dead in the middle, I’m swinging the club just fine, and it’s just not going as far. So I’d be stupid to make any definite statements about never going to a distance or crossover club. I’ve never understood why people will absolutely ruin their games and their swings over the number on the bottom of the club — trying to hit a 6i from 185 when they really need 5 or 4 or even 3, depending on the level of player — but I’ve always been saying that as somebody who was pretty long. Once I hit the other side of the fence, maybe I’ll be getting a big dose of now-you-know.

      Reply

      stephenf

      5 years ago

      As for these specific irons, they look fine, except that I get so irritated by thick top lines that I’m probably not the guy to make that evaluation of one club versus another based on the look at address. Pretty much every player’s club is too thick on the top line, as far as I’m concerned. But I don’t know how you get around that without laying out the money for custom. Still trying to adjust, but I guess you just have to.

      Reply

      joro

      5 years ago

      Don’t ever put down Wilson, they are back. I have been playing them for years now and they just keep getting better and better and now are just as good as the “Big Boys” and spend their money on performance and not marketing to convince people they are good. I am sure when they come out with lefties I will have them in me bag. I play the C300s now and if these are better they will be amazing.

      To those who put Wilson down, try them and then tell us what you think.

      Reply

      stephenf

      5 years ago

      So right. Anybody who does some serious checking around with player reviews of performance and feel of their better-player irons like the FG-62, FG-100, and FG Tour V-series will find out pretty quickly that they’re rated at least as good as the other top competition.

      Reply

      RAT

      5 years ago

      Started on Wilson blades back when! I have played Wilson all my life -Blades, P7, Di9, Fg V2 and others too far back to remember. I play the Fg Tour V2 now and they are the best club I’ve ever played ….. The V2 is still better than any on the market today. I have tried the New Cortex Driver ,it is as good as any presently on the market if not better. I prefer the 9* due that it’s head is smaller… It’s a power house.. Wilson is determined to be the best again and it shows in what they are offering now and into the future as you will see! This is the King of the Hill to be again …

      DANIEL JANYJA

      5 years ago

      The 4 & 5 irons violate Tom Wishon’s 24 degrees loft, 38″ length rule for mid handicap golfers: loft less than 24 and length over 38″ hard to hit for average golfers.

      Reply

      Steve S

      5 years ago

      Lofts are pretty much in line with TM’s M2 irons.

      Reply

      Shane

      5 years ago

      Recoils as a stock offering, I’m putting my order in ASAP!!

      Reply

      Steve S

      5 years ago

      Kudos to Wilson for their pricing….on irons and balls anyway.

      Reply

      Nihonsei

      5 years ago

      These are great looking in the bag if Wilson is prepping a follow up money maker by selling iron head covers. One more “Power Slot” on that 7i and they’ve created the best smuggler’s iron for return trips from your Latin America getaway! Sign me up for a 16* 3i, 14* Hy, !0* 3w, and a 5* Cortex?

      Reply

      Shane Lewis

      5 years ago

      Just when I was on the fence on which irons to pick, these make their official appearance! Lots of iron plus Recoil as a stock offering for the money!! Looks like I’ll remain on the W/S team!!

      Reply

      Waazzupppp

      5 years ago

      I’m still on the fence as far as this whole delofting thing goes. I mean, why not just label the irons by loft and let everyone stop worrying about “how far my 6 iron goes”?

      That said, it’s nice to see the “tech” develop from the D100 to the D7 and start seeing ‘normal’ looking heads on distance irons. I’ll give these a swing, even though they don’t fit my “profile” like some others do, but I have a feeling I’m due for another season on my FG100’s next year.

      Reply

      Tim H

      5 years ago

      Ben Hogan Company tried to label and sell by loft and consumers didn’t buy it. I thought it made sense too.

      Reply

      stephenf

      5 years ago

      Same here. Putting a 25-degree loft on the club you stamp “6” on, and 31 degrees on your other 6-iron…I mean, good grief. I hit good players’ muscle and forged cavities, but if I go hit this thing at the range, it’s going to go 15 or more yards farther. Or, I could just go up a club or two, depending on conditions and draw v. fade.

      People absolutely ruin their games for the difference between one number stamped on the bottom versus a different number. But I guess if you can’t change the way people think, you just go with it and sell clubs anyway. Nothing wrong with a company doing that, but I just don’t understand why people do this.

      PeteT

      5 years ago

      Only because every other manufacture is touting how far their “7” iron goes. Can’t lie about distance if everyone is using true loft. Holy Sh!T Batman, the PW in this set is 43 degrees. PWs used to be 50 degrees back in the day. My old 7 iron used to be 38 degrees. These are a full 10 degrees stronger than 1968. Technology is great, but anything will fly further the more you deloft it. It would truly be nice if MGS could do an apples to apples comparison.

      Bob

      5 years ago

      So what happens when the holes get clogged with dirt?

      Reply

      Steve S

      5 years ago

      The holes are filled with some kind of plastic or rubber compound.

      Reply

      warbirdlover

      5 years ago

      I like to see the Wilson’s and Tour Edge’s etc giving the big boys some competition. I’d play these irons.

      Reply

      Russ

      5 years ago

      I like the badge, but miss the traditional red/black.

      The price is fantastic. But it begs to be asked – what will the availability of these clubs be? Because right now, I need to drive an hour to find W/S clubs. Why would (or should) I do that when I can demo many other OEMs less than 10 minutes away?

      New tech and looks are great, but if you can’t find ’em in a store…

      Reply

      Rob

      5 years ago

      So what are the D350 for and where do they fit into the mix now that the D7 irons are coming?

      Reply

      John Barba

      5 years ago

      D350 is what you’d call Super-Duper Game Improvement, with hybrids a standard part of the package instead of long irons – the whole set is designed to be as forgiving as possible, targeted mostly at your serious beginner. D300 and now D7 is standard Super Game Improvement. aimed a recreational golfers, improving beginners, seniors looking for distance, etc. Sounds like shades of difference, but there are differences…most every OEM has similar setups aimed at that end of the market.

      Pergande did tell me the D series (300/350) is their biggest selling segment – and that’s most likely true for other OEMs, as well. It’s the big old fat part of the market – mid-to-high handicappers who need the most help getting the ball in the air in the general direction of the hole.

      Reply

      JP

      5 years ago

      They look good, but those are some serious strong lofts.

      Reply

      Berniez40

      5 years ago

      As one who has gamed Wilson Staff Distance Irons in the past–Their old Di-9’s were a huge help in turning my game back around after a bout with a bad back as well as tendonitis, I became a huge Wilson Staff Fan Boy. I gamed there 302 Pan-Headed Dimple Ball back then and the two were an amazing combo. I have found nothing to top my Srixon Z-355’s—but I am always looking. Thanks MGS for a great article as usual. After all, it is a combo of MGS Articles and fittings from an honest vendor that make up the majority of my current bag. (Srixon Z-355 Irons and Taylormade 2016 M2 Driver)

      Reply

      Thomas A

      5 years ago

      Definitely going to test these against my FG Tour F5 irons.

      Reply

      Pete

      5 years ago

      Wow. Wilson is killing it. I have to admit I don’t get as much love as other brands, but they have really stepped their game up. They have been putting out some gorgeous work.

      Reply

      C

      5 years ago

      RE-AKT. Just typing that is aggravating. Why the intentional misspelling?

      Reply

      Berniez40

      5 years ago

      Could be dodging a copywrite bullet as compared to the REAX Technology claimed by Fujikura….You know how sue happy these golf companies are. Remember the old Callaway Titlesist shoot out over golf ball technology, and the more recent Titlesist threatening everyone else…including Costco……Hell Monster energy drinks went around suing anything that said Monster on it while tha peddled their poison. They even tried suing a guitar cable company that had been using the name for years……

      Reply

      Steve S

      5 years ago

      Probably because ReAct would violate Taylormade’s trademark.

      Reply

      Mike

      5 years ago

      A lot of club for the money! Looks like one of the nicer SGI irons too. I definitely wouldn’t be embarrassed to have them in my bag

      Reply

      SV

      5 years ago

      Nice looking irons. I have read that most players of average ability should not be hitting irons with lofts less than about 26*. If so, it appears the standard set make-up of 4-GW would leave the player with 3 clubs they shouldn’t be using. Certainly a 15+ handicap would have problems with a 19* 4 iron. Just for reference, a 1 iron had a loft of 17* and a 2 iron was 20* with most people unable to hit either.

      Reply

      Sharkhark

      5 years ago

      Yep we all know strong lofts are the current argument these days but these are ridiculous.
      Unless you test them and they’ve made a 22 deg 5 iron that’s easy to hit (in which then I’d say ok) you’ve just designed a set that requires a boatload of wedges for gapping.
      28 degree 7 iron? That’s just nuts. I’m tired of the claim of low loft high flight I’ve mostly tested these in other irons and have had low loft low flight low spin.

      Reply

      Mike

      5 years ago

      Wilson as a whole seems to keep a more traditional loft structure than the rest of the industry, but in this segment there is no way they could compete (while keeping lofts more traditional) when Callaway and Taylormade have comparable sets with even stronger lofts.

      The big boys have created a messy game for all the other companies.

      Bruce Neerhof

      5 years ago

      I agree with you 100%. Just saw their commercial on TV. Of course a 28 degree 7 iron is going to go 15 yards farther than your 7 iron with a conventional loft. Silly

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.