First Look: Foresight Essential Putting Analysis for GCQuad Launch Monitors
News

First Look: Foresight Essential Putting Analysis for GCQuad Launch Monitors

First Look: Foresight Essential Putting Analysis for GCQuad Launch Monitors

Next Monday (2/12/18), Foresight Sports will officially announce a compelling add-on for its GCQuad Launch Monitor Platform. The new release is the first of what will likely prove to be several technology enhancements that Foresight will roll out in 2018.

Those who attended the PGA Show got an early look at what Foresight is calling Essential Putting Analysis. The new software is designed to offer Unprecedented Insight Into Your Putting Performance. That last bit is Foresight’s language, but it’s absolutely true that users of what I suppose we should describe as conventional launch monitors have never had this level of detailed insight into putter performance before.

quad-putting

In simple terms, Essential Putting transforms the GCQuad from a launch monitor into a putting launch monitor. That may not sound like much, but it’s a really cool little detail that has significant implications for anyone looking to better understand and improve putter performance.

With just a couple of clicks in the Quad’s interface, putter specific data is displayed on the LCD screen as well as any connected PC (FSX Software) or mobile device (Performance Fitting App), allowing the functionality to be used both indoors and out. As you’d expect, the putter data has a small bit of overlap with the data you get from a driver or an iron, but the majority of measurements are specific to putting.

Ball Data

fsx-putting-ball-data

On the ball side of the equation, Essential Putting gives you:

  • Ball Speed
  • Launch Angle
  • Launch Spin
  • Carry (inches)
  • Skid
  • Time to Roll (seconds)
  • Distance to Roll (feet)
  • Roll Spin
  • Total Distance
  • Push/Pull (similar to horizontal launch angle)

Head Data

fsx-putting-head-data

Where head data is concerned, the available information varies based on the number of fiducials used. In the event I lost you at fiducials, I’m talking about the face stickers. It’s about time we all (myself included) got onboard with the correct lingo.

Here’s the breakdown of what you get with the different fiducial counts:

1 Marker (placed center top): Club Speed, Smash Factor, Club Path, and Angle of Attack

2 Markers (one heel, one toe, placed along horizontal center): All of the above, plus Face Angle (relative to target path), and Lie Angle (at impact)

3 Markers (heel at horizontal center + one each high and low toe, equidistant from horizontal center): All of the above plus Impact Loft.

fiducials-close

Pricing

Foresight’s Essential Putting Analysis has a price tag of $2500 above and beyond whatever other options you’ve paid for. That may sound expensive, so it’s important to put the cost in perspective. Essential Putting Analysis is intended to give CGQuad owners an option to leverage the equipment they already own rather than purchase a standalone specialty putting product like SAM or Quintic, which cost 2-3 times as much as the Foresight feature.

Essential Putting Analysis brings Foresight’s industry-leading accuracy to the flat stick and that has practical applications for instructors (and their students), fitters, R&D departments, and for us here at MyGolfSpy as we continue to look for ways to present more robust putting data and expand our understanding of why the top putters in our test perform better.

quad-putting-2

Essential Putting Analysis is available exclusively on GCQuad beginning tomorrow (2/12/2018).

For more information, visit ForesightSports.com.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Ryan

      6 years ago

      I think this is a great start but it’s far from perfect. I will say they are waaaaay ahead of the game. The mobility and ease of us are far and away best in the market.

      Now having said that… I’d like to see dimple variation included in the data set. The removal outliers and the creation of a standard deviation can cause a false reading in my experience. The data set as a whole including outliers is crucial. And I’d also like to see a better way to calibrate it than the stick you visually line up.

      Overall these guys are on their way to creating a ‘moneyball’ like revolution for putting and I for one can’t wait! Great article btw

      Reply

      P.J.

      6 years ago

      Really cool and important information – but priced well out of the average golfer’s price range. Especially since it’s an Add-on…

      Reply

      Andrew Han

      6 years ago

      As you guys are going through the most wanted putter, what metrics are you going to include from GCQUAD, and how much weight are you going to place on it? I guess it’s a matter of how many putts to hole out in the end, but would be interesting to see data with mishits and the consequences from them. Also, how is alignment captured with this device?

      Reply

      JasonA

      6 years ago

      Quite simple: Are you interested in knowing about
      (A) club and ball interaction or
      (B) ball aerodynamics ?

      GCQuad is _best_ in (A)
      Radar is only option for (B)

      And if you want best of both… hope you have deep pockets ;-)

      I think that club testing of the nature that MyGolfSpy is doing should be done on GCQuad with the barometric adjustment feature OFF. Weather should not cause variance in the results. Also test area should be at same temperature each time. Closed data is the right way to go sometimes.

      Reply

      Sebastian

      6 years ago

      Can MGS use this feature to find the least skidding putter face? And then the number differences on off center hits? If you use a putting machine, then there would be undeniable results in the “technology” in a putter face.

      That would be one of the greatest putter tests anyone could perform.

      Reply

      W

      6 years ago

      From my training a putt wants to skid about 18% of its total length when fitting a putter. This number comes from years of study using a 10,000 frame/sec camera in doors @ 70 degree F.
      W

      Reply

      Sebastian

      6 years ago

      Ok. But these new technologies in putter faces claim to reduce skid massively. Even eliminate it.

      KM

      6 years ago

      Just put it in the hole!

      Reply

      Rod_CCCGOLFUSA

      6 years ago

      I observed the Trackman putter launch monitor demo at the PGA Show. Participants seemed stunned and dumbfounded by the data tables and fitting babble of the sales reps. Too much information. Like Ben Crenshaw has said: It’s all about feel.

      Reply

      Johnny Cowboy

      6 years ago

      Foresight is accurate, outside is not.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      6 years ago

      While my gut is to simply say this isn’t true, I suppose it’s more nuanced than that.

      With GCQuad, you get a barometric pressure sensor which gets you a good bit of your environmental factors. It’s not a secret that Foresight GCQuad cant’t account for wind, and so in that respect you’re are playing to a normalized baseline. That said, I think the outdoor carry accuracy will surprise people, and certainly, for what we do, the environmental consistency is huge positive. I’d also mention that competing systems have stated tolerances for downrange accuracy as well which are seldom discussed when people try and play the my launch monitor is better than yours game. And that’s before we talk about the glaring indoor short flight deficiencies of radar systems. And of course, GCQuad offers much more accurate (and again, consistent) head data than other systems, which is also critically important to what we do.

      There are a multitude of reasons why someone would choose one system over another, but for what we do here, nothing else is even in the conversation.

      As I’ve said often, every system has strengths and weakness, but Quad’s barometric sensor has cut significantly into what for our purposes was an overblown criticism and the new putting piece give us (and other Quad users) another way to leverage the device. I’m only just starting to play with it, but thus far it seems to work really well. I can’t wait to see how Foresight evolves the platform.

      Reply

      Terry M McDowell

      6 years ago

      But we don’t play golf on a launch monitor, we play outside!

      Robert

      6 years ago

      Hi Tony, it seems interesting and indeed the price seems fair taken into consideration the price point of devices like SAM. I assume that this is as accurate as anything but did you get the chance to do a head to head in order to determine the accuracy of the software?

      Reply

      DaveMac

      6 years ago

      I disagree about the additional price, perhaps somewhat unrealistic I feel this feature should be a thank you, for all the customers who have stumped up the not insignificant sum required to own a GCQuad.

      The feature could further cement the GCQuad’s position in the launch monitor market, encouraging more people to buy.

      Don’t forget this is the same hardware, yes development time was involved but much of this would be required to keep GC Quad cutting-edge.

      Reply

      David

      6 years ago

      Davemac …. I believe all new purchases have the putting app included. I bought my quad last fall and had to make a small upcharge to get the putting feature since I was told it was coming. I am very satisfied with the cost. As for inside outside, Trackman just guesses at smash factor since it never sees impact. Point of touch is where all data happens and only a camera can capture that data.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.