BACK IN STOCK: Foresight GC3 and Bushnell Launch Pro Launch Monitors
News

BACK IN STOCK: Foresight GC3 and Bushnell Launch Pro Launch Monitors

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

BACK IN STOCK: Foresight GC3 and Bushnell Launch Pro Launch Monitors
  • Foresight and Bushnell have launched GC3 and Launch Pro launch monitors.
  • The GC3 is a pay one-time option while the Launch Pro is largely subscription-based.
  • Prices range from $2,999 to $6,995.

A photo of the Foresight GC3. The device is the same as the Bushnell Launch Pro.

*The GC3 is back in stock with the NEW FSX software with 10 extra courses. These courses include Pebble Beach, Old Course at St Andrew’s, Spyglass, and many more.*

It’s an exciting time for Foresight sports, which means it’s an exciting time for golfers. The company recently was acquired by Vista Outdoors for $474 million. That brings Foresight under the same corporate umbrella as Bushnell Golf. The timing couldn’t be better as Foresight and Bushnell are partnering on the release of two … well, one, but kinda two … new compelling offerings in the personal launch monitor category.

Launching simultaneously are the Foresight GC3 and Bushnell Launch Pro launch monitors.

Foresight GC3 / Bushnell Launch Pro – Technical Details

Let’s get the technical bits out of the way. Both the GC3 and Launch Pro are manufactured by Foresight Sports. The San Diego-based company recently expanded its headquarters where the new launch monitors are assembled. It now has the capability to produce well over 200 units a day to help keep up with the anticipated demand.

Both the GC3 and Launch Pro are photometric (i.e, camera-based) systems. As you might surmise from the name, three cameras give the devices the ability to accurately capture both ball and clubhead data. While that’s not quite a GC Quad, the new device is more powerful than Foresight’s prior-generation GC2. Not bad for what’s being loosely billed as consumer-grade, or at least prosumer-grade, equipment.

The reality is that camera-based systems are invariably more accurate indoors and in limited-flight environments. They’re also able to more accurately capture spin rates in any condition. For most golfers looking for a launch monitor solution, a camera-based system is going to be the better choice.

Foresight GC3 Versus Bushnell Launch Pro

At this point, you may be a little bit puzzled. GC3Launch Pro … What’s the difference?

Most notably, one has badges that read “Foresight Sports” and “GC3” while the other’s badges read “Bushnell Launch Pro” and  “Foresight Sports.”

Seriously, that’s the biggest physical difference. The stuff that actually matters, the stuff on the inside—the circuitry, the cameras, every last bit of hardware and software—it’s 100-percent identical.

The obvious follow-up question is: If they’re the same, why are there two of them?

The answer boils down to price and functionality.

GC3 and Launch Pro Pricing

As far as the pricing part goes, the Foresight GC3 will set you back $6,995. I think we can safely assume that not everyone has $7K to spend on a launch monitor. I’m pretty sure that’s about what a new Yugo cost back in the day.

The Bushnell Launch Pro is priced at $2,999 and, while that’s still more than a lot of golfers are able to spend, we’re at least in the ballpark. At a minimum, it makes premium camera-based launch monitor technology accessible to significantly more golfers.

For sure, $3,000 is a big jump from the $500 (give or take) price point of entry-level, radar-based (tiny Doppler) units but, as I’ve been saying for years now, reliable accuracy comes at a cost and that cost is, realistically, quite a bit more than $500. Sorry, that’s just the reality of where the technology is today.

As for functionality, well, that’s where the products diverge a bit.

The Foresight GC3 is an out-of-the-box, pay one-time, fully functional device. It gives you access to absolutely all the ball and head data the device can capture as well as fully functional FSX simulation and practice software with course bundle, Foresight’s Fairgrounds gaming package and access to online play.

As far as the specifics of the ball and head data are concerned, the breakdown looks like this:

GC3/Launch Pro Data

The display screen of the Foresight GC3 / Bushnell Launch Pro launch monitor

Ball Data

  • Launch Angle
  • Side Angle
  • Ball Speed
  • Total Spin
  • Back Spin
  • Spide Spin
  • Spin Axis
  • Carry Distance
  • Total Distance*
  • Offline Distance*
  • Descent Angle*
  • Peak Height*

* through FSX or FSX Pro Software only.

Club Data

  • Clubhead Speed
  • Smash Factor
  • Club Path
  • Angle of Attack

The dataset isn’t nearly as robust as what’s offered by the GC Quad but, given the price difference, you shouldn’t expect it to be. Foresight wasn’t willing to compromise on accuracy and so, in addition to the more robust hardware, the point of differentiation between the GC Quad and the GC3 is the number of metrics provided.

It’s worth a quick mention that the GC Quad requires four fiducials (reflective stickers) on the face to capture head data. While the data points provided by the GC3 aren’t as robust as what you get with the significantly higher-priced Quad, only a single fiducial is required.

That’s the Foresight GC3 in a nutshell.

a view of the backside of the Foresight GC3 / Bushnell Launch Pro launch monitors

Bushnell Launch Pro Subscription Options

The more budget-friendly Bushnell Launch Pro is a subscription-driven offering.

$2,999 gets you a Bushnell Launch Pro with basic functionality. In this case, basic functionality means all of the ball data metrics, no head data and output that is limited to a single shot on the Launch Pro’s LCD display. There’s no ability to store, export or otherwise retain data.

In that respect, the presentation of data is similar to what you get with many of the entry-level units. The difference here is accuracy, especially as it relates to your spin axis and total spin numbers.

From there, additional functionality can be enabled via annual subscription.

The first upgrade option (the Basic plan) will set you back $99 per year (the first year is free with GC3 purchase). It includes the ability to connect to an iPad and show 2D ball flight on a range similar to what originally came with the GC Quad. You can save up to 1 session locally and another 10 in the cloud.

Provided metrics are limited to Carry Distance, Ball Speed, Total Spin, Horizontal Launch Angle, Vertical Launch Angle, Clubhead Speed, and Smash Factor.

For $399 annually (Silver Plan), you get all of the functionality of the $99 package with the addition of a basic simulation package. It gives you the ability to connect (to a computer) and project (to a screen). There’s no access to online games, but you can play virtual golf (5 courses are included) and practice on the range. Up to 4 players can play at once. With the FSX or FSX Pro (FSX Pro not included) software packages, you also get data for Total Distance, Offline Distance, Descent angle, and Peak Height.

Additional courses are $150 (standard) or $250 (premium). Zombie golf and Foresight Fairgrounds games are an additional $125 each.

You can save up to 5 sessions locally and 20 more in the cloud. This should meet the home practice needs of most golfers.

The $799 Gold Plan (also billed annually) effectively turns the Bushnell Launch Pro into a GC3. You get all the bells and whistles: full simulation capabilities (up to 8 golfers at a time), as well as all of the ball and clubhead metrics offered by the GC3.

Additional courses for Gold package users are $125 (standard course) and $200 (premium course). Zombie golf and Fairgrounds are $99 each.

The $799 Bushnell Launch Pro package puts the device almost on even footing with the Foresight GC3. Both include the ability to connect 3rd party simulation software like e6.

The primary difference between the two is simply a matter of how you choose to pay to get there (and, of course, the badge on the unit itself).

GC3/Launch Pro Accuracy (Versus GC Quad)

a side by side image of the Foresight GC3 and GCQuad

While price is no doubt a consideration for many of you, the biggest question should rightfully be: “Is it accurate?” The short answer is yes. Regardless of which name it goes by, the Foresight GC3/Bushnell Launch Pro is the single most impressive launch monitor we’ve seen outside of the enterprise-class.

In our preliminary testing, which involved shots hit both indoors and out, the numbers displayed on the device were much closer to the GC Quad than anything we’ve tested to date.

To give you just a taste, the following charts compare a series of three shots collected during preliminary testing.

With the driver, reported carry distances varied by three yards on average, ball speeds were within one mph but, perhaps most impressively, average differences in spin rates differed by less than 100 rpm. For consumer-grade launch monitors that report spin, those values are often off by several hundred RPMs and occasionally by a few thousand. It should go without saying that the accuracy of the GC3/Launch Pro data is significantly better.

In our brief 7-iron comparison, the GC3/Launch Pro again exceeded expectations. Distance numbers were scary close. Ball speed numbers were again all but identical. Reported launch angle differences were negligible and the accuracy of the critical spin measurement dwarfs anything we’ve tested to date.

Finally, we tested with a 50-degree wedge. As you should probably expect by now, carry, ball speed, launch angle and launch direction measurements were effectively identical. For reference, with other personal launch monitors we’ve tested, it’s not uncommon to see distance numbers vary by several yards, ball speeds differ by a few mph and launch angles off to the tune of five degrees. With the higher spin of wedges, we do see a bit more variation in those numbers but, on percentage, the numbers are still really close and from the perspective of the end-user, well within the realm of reliability.

This is by no means a complete evaluation. It’s not meant to be but what we’ve seen so far is exceptionally encouraging. A full review with more data is in the works and should follow shortly.

You can certainly wait for the review, though if you’re in the market for a personal launch monitor, I’d have no reservations about buying now. Regardless of whether it’s the Foresight GC3 or the Bushnell Launch Pro, the preliminary data we’ve collected suggests it’s the most accurate consumer-grade launch monitor we’ve seen to date. The fact that it works equally well indoors and out and in both full flight and limited flight (including into a net) makes the offering that much sweeter.

The price point is likely higher than many of you want it to be but it’s the first device we’ve seen in the category (even if it’s on the extreme edge of the category) that delivers accuracy on par with the enterprise-class. And frankly, what good is a launch monitor if it isn’t accurate?

The Foresight GC3 and Bushnell Launch Pro are available for order beginning Oct. 3 through Foresight Sports and Bushnell Golf.

For those looking for complete simulator solutions, Sim-in-a-box options are also available.

For more information, visit Foresightsports.com or Bushnellgolf.com.

For You

For You

Golf Balls
Apr 22, 2024
Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
Golf Technology
Apr 21, 2024
Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
News
Apr 20, 2024
Testers Wanted: Toura Golf Club Build Test
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Gib

      3 years ago

      I would love it if you could add the mevo+ to the accuracy tracker info you provided here. It would be great to know exactly how much more accuracy you are getting for $4000.

      Reply

      P.J.

      3 years ago

      Thanks for the review – when I first heard about these new Bushnell and Foresight launch monitors, it made me wonder if it’d offer a better features/value/accuracy than my SkyTrak.
      At this price point, with all the add-on’s, it makes me very happy with my SkyTrak! I’ve been very happy with the data and accuracy it provides, having gone from a 12.4 to a 6.6 handicap this year!

      Reply

      Warren

      3 years ago

      I tried to purchase either one around an hour after they added the option to their websites. They are both completely sold out unless you buy it with a simulator. I’m guessing their production is nowhere close to being ready for general sale. The Uneekor is sounding more appealing with every day. The QED would be a great buy if you could use any ball with it.

      Reply

      Brock

      3 years ago

      Agreed. With the data given in this article I’m very happy with my Skytrak today. If I’m stepping up I’m getting an Uneekor for the slow speed camera and additional club head stats.

      Reply

      Hit-the-7-iron!

      3 years ago

      The Uneekor system is impressive. The added benefit of the GC3 being portable makes it a better choice for me.

      Reply

      Omar

      3 years ago

      Any idea if the Launch Pro will work with other non bushnell software platforms, ie: E6, TGC.. or are they locking you into their software only…

      Reply

      Creek

      3 years ago

      I look forward to seeing a bake off between these a skytrak and a full swing golf kit. I have a skytrak and a kit on order but these are intriguing. For those asking why you would buy one if these. . . In Wisconsin getting some buddies out on a Saturday and Sunday for sim golf is a great way to get thru winter.

      Reply

      Alex

      3 years ago

      Little bit bummed at this, especially for the international market. I can’t justify the price of this for home use. looks like an incredible piece of kit though. Jealous to all those who are getting one!

      Reply

      Dakota Asnip

      3 years ago

      There are two kinds of people. People that still go to the gym daily. (They will think this is stupid) and people who have set up a home gym. (They will think this product is awesome and worth it.).

      Reply

      Michael J Lee

      3 years ago

      Used GC2 should be much better priced! Any thoughts?

      Reply

      Webster

      3 years ago

      Skytrak just breathed a sign of relief with this pricing structure.

      Reply

      Craig

      3 years ago

      It is interesting. I already own a Skytrak and this review seems to indicate a GC3 would only be a minor upgrade for twice the price.

      Reply

      chopper

      3 years ago

      For a $7000 device, a $1000 software is only $6000. Compared with a $2000 camera or radar device, the customer base is different. Please give me an accurate and cheap choice. Well mevo+ just breathed a sign of relief with this pricing structure.

      Reply

      Jorge

      3 years ago

      Love their pricing on the software, it’s like selling someone a car, and then you hear, “wheels are extra”. For the Launch Pro to be of any use, you need to get the $800/yr package, that’s the one that has the crucial data… and even that info is really not worth it…”yeah, I shot a 98 today because my backspin was 200 mph less today”

      So, $3,800 for the Launch Pro for the first year. Here’s what $3,800 could get you: Ping Driver (550), Ping 3 Wood (340), Mizuno Forged Irons w/fitting (1,500), Scotty Cameron Putter (400), Rapsodo/Mevo/R10 (500), Bag (260), 3 dozen left dash balls (150), flowers & dinner for the wife (100)

      or…

      SkyTrak (2000), Launch Pro Sticker (5), Lessons (600), Hitting net & mats (125), 3 DZ left dash (150), iPad (700), Beer & Advil (220)

      Reply

      Hit-the-7-iron!

      3 years ago

      I’m going to look into getting the GC3 and the SIM in a box and financing some or most of it for five years, as opposed to getting the Launch Pro and the annual $700 subscription. At least after the five years, I’d own it all. BUT, by then it would be antiquated and I’d want to get the upgraded version.

      It never ends, ARG!

      Reply

      Frank

      3 years ago

      Would also be interesting to know if the monthly subscription is available for 12 months at a time only, or ala carte. Many users in cold climates might only need the extra options during the winter months, while choosing not to subscribe when the ability to hit outdoors is available. What exactly turns these options on or off? Does this unit require internet access just to see what options are tied to the serial number? IDK

      Reply

      Tim R

      3 years ago

      First, the Yugo reference deserves kudos.
      Secondly, I can’t see spending that kind of cheddar on a launch monitor. Most of us will only get on a high quality launch monitor when it’s a fitting. Other than that, the Rapsodo provides enough practice data, for me.

      Reply

      Webster

      3 years ago

      If only the Yugo reference had been correct. It launched at $3,990.

      Reply

      ryan moszynski

      3 years ago

      i would rather not have the device than pay any of those subscription fee schedules. knowing that you have $7k of device sitting next to you and it’s performing like a $1k machine due to software lockouts, my brain just nopes right out of that situation.

      Reply

      Ian Barrett

      3 years ago

      But you aren’t paying 7k for the device if it doesn’t have all the features. You are paying 3k. Plus I never understood why people think just because it’s software, you shoujld get it for free. Only hardware has costs to it?

      Reply

      Tim Root

      3 years ago

      I don’t disagree with your statement. There is certainly a cost to the software development – but when it is a tack-on cost, it feels different than if it was included. (for example – price point at $3799 including the software package). Granted, the marketing couldn’t say “less than $3000” but at least it would be fully functional out of the box without added subscription charges.

      Cris

      3 years ago

      If you pay the $7K you won’t have that issue. Of course, if you pay $3K then you shouldn’t expect – unreasonably so – the unit to provide you the same level of access at a 60% discount.

      Reply

      Henry

      3 years ago

      This is a great concise review of the new GC3. I like the head to head data for GC3 Vs. GCQuad… Excellent work

      Reply

      Carolyn

      3 years ago

      If you have the money great can go from a 19 handicap to a 17 in about 3 months..money well spent………

      Reply

      Garrett

      3 years ago

      Would you like some more wine with that salt?

      Reply

      Glen

      3 years ago

      Price depends on how much information you want to know about your swing. I have a $200 unit that measures swing speed, ball speed, carry and distance. It was measured against a Trackman and all the numbers were spot on with 3 different clubs. If you want all the other information launch angle, launch direction, spin , etc the you have to pay the big bucks. My unit is fine for the things I need to know about. I freely admit I am not a serious or good enough golfer to know what all these other numbers mean or what to do with the information.

      Reply

      JC

      3 years ago

      What device do you have? Is it accurate both indoors and out?
      Thanks!

      Reply

      WYBob

      3 years ago

      Nice initial review of both devices. While they are a step up in the personal launch monitor space, the pricing will be a barrier to most. I suspect that with time, these technologies will eventually come down the price/performance curve to a point where us mere mortal golfers can afford them. It may be worth it if someone is setting up an indoor hitting bay. at home Then the Launch Pro may be viable given its lower upfront cost and menu of add on features. That said, until the pricing drop to about half of its current cost, I think I’m better served by getting fitted, taking lessons, and buying a “less” accurate launch monitor in the $5-600 range..

      Reply

      Mike

      3 years ago

      Any financing options offered?

      Reply

      Harry P

      3 years ago

      Top Tracer Range, Monitor or Mobile – $9 for a large bucket with accurate ball data. Why spend $$$ on personal launch monitor?

      Reply

      Liam

      3 years ago

      You did not just use the words accurate and top tracer in the same sentence…

      Reply

      Tom

      3 years ago

      And range balls were covered in the Ball Lab robot testing!

      Bushnellie

      3 years ago

      MGS’s 2021 ball review on Range balls stated that they don’t perform the same as regular balls and will give you inaccurate data to take to the golf course. I was looking for a personal launch monitor like the LaunchPro to use at my local driving range but am having second thoughts now.

      Reply

      Harry P

      3 years ago

      OK I guess I should have said accurate enough for a range ball but I know what my ball flight and carry should be so just looking for some confirmation and not a fitting. Also, for my irons, hitting a range ball off grass provides more useful/reliable on course info than my premium ball into a monitor.

      Reply

      Jorge

      3 years ago

      I feel the Launch Pro will sell well in the northern states and other inclement weather areas (UK, Sweden, etc.). Fortunately, I live in Southern California where I can pay $50 a month for free daily large bucket of balls at the range where I can see the true path and shape of the shot. I will use a $500 launch monitor to track my clubs, and save the other $2,500 for green fees and new clubs. Also, the $33-70 per month software subscription is pure BS. It’s all about goosing us for more money.

      Reply

      Phil

      3 years ago

      Is the only way to get club head data with the Launch Pro to pay the full $799 subscription option? I’m not looking for simulation or indoor use, so I’d love an option that gives all the practice data without the simulation. Also, echoing a comment above, is there any way to get club face impact information? Thanks for the good article!

      Reply

      Jordan

      3 years ago

      I’m in. Had the option presented to my wife of either joining a club or building a home sim. Chose the sim.

      Reply

      Jorge

      3 years ago

      Some good country clubs have indoor sims with GC Quads & Trackmans.

      Reply

      Peter

      3 years ago

      I can’t see anyone buying the Bushnell one and subscribing to the $800 per year option… that makes no sense at all … maybe the $200 option if that’s all they think they need, but my prediction is the foresight unit far outsells the Bushnell.

      Reply

      Hanes

      3 years ago

      That makes a ton of sence…. All the „where is the the financing?„ Option peoples will subscribe…. They allready started yelling about… See above

      Reply

      Emery

      3 years ago

      Seems like great RENTAL business as many golfers would only need on occasion dialing in a club or ball if originally properly fitted and play regularly. Unless you live in Snow States or Great White North!

      Reply

      Rich

      3 years ago

      Sound like a business plan to me!

      Reply

      Christopher Swope

      3 years ago

      In case anyone was wondering what club data GCQuad will give you compared to GC3: strike, delivered face angle, delivered lie angle, or impact loft.

      Reply

      MarkM

      3 years ago

      Soooooo we’re supposed to get excited about a $7K launch monitor?! Get real. This may be great news for coaches, learning centers, colleges, etc. but what’s the percentage of non-elite golfers who can go this route?

      Reply

      Hit-the-7-iron!

      3 years ago

      I agree 100%. Well said, well spoken.

      Reply

      Corey

      3 years ago

      This two devices look amazing! It’s going to be a difficult conversation with my children to explain why they’re going to have to go to a community college now. Ha!!!

      Reply

      Scott

      3 years ago

      Will any of the options provide impact location or does that require 4-dot data? Also, most lm’s seem to have poor putting accuracy, is this basically at or very near gc4 for putting accuracy? Thanks!

      Reply

      FrankW

      3 years ago

      I believe it’s only one dot data. that means no Loft/Lie, Face Angle, Impact Location, or Closure Rate

      Reply

      ANTHONY

      3 years ago

      Hi Tony,

      Do you know if fsx2020 will need to be purchased for the GC3 as standalone?

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      3 years ago

      A light version of FSX will be included with the silver version. As I understand it, FSX and FSX Pro are both included in the gold package.

      Reply

      Roberto

      2 years ago

      You probably already found the answer but FSX2020 and FSXPro and FSX Live are all included with the GC3 full package. Plus all the upgrades for life. I just spoke with my rep at Foresight and we are working on a premium course bundle. He recommended that I wait for Black Friday or Cyber Monday to buy the premium courses at an additional discount.

      Reply

      Redo

      3 years ago

      No thanks

      Reply

      Dale

      3 years ago

      Tony, thanks for this overview. Do these have a quick way to report dispersion? Be nice to know how far offline each shot is. I’m sure they could report it, but do they? Thanks.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      3 years ago

      Any of the app-drive stuff will show disperson.

      Michael DeJesus

      3 years ago

      Interesting article. I’m at a loss though on who the target market is for these devices.

      Professionals whose income is dependent on a launch monitor would likely get the quad.

      Some teaching pros might use this product but most amateurs wouldn’t want to drop $3-6K on a launch monitor.

      Reply

      BillGolf

      3 years ago

      The target market could be two-fold: The well-healed college player/D1 and/or the aspiring pro; and the guys like me that want to have a top of the line simulator and mobile launch monitor without breaking the (my) bank.. So for around 10K I can get within whiskers of a 25 to 35K system that includes head data/club analysis?. Bring.It.On!

      Reply

      Roberto

      2 years ago

      Thanks for a sensible post. Incredible how people judge based purely on ignorance of subject. Software is expensive and licensing is doubly absurd. Our company spends millions of dollars every year with Microsoft, VmWare, McAfee etc, licensing. Is the gift that keeps on giving for the software companies. The GC3 fully unlocked and software upgrade for life is a no brainer if you can swing the cash. I ordered mine on November 1st after 2 years of saving for something better than the Skytrack. or Mevo +. In Colorado is going to come in handy and the fact that I work from home its going to be a plus.

      Fraser

      3 years ago

      I’m interested. It is nearly as accurate as GC Quad for half the price. with lots of great data that is very useful to help you improve. Good for the winter months when its dark and there is no time to play after work – if you are wanting to try to keep improving. 7000 is a bit more realistic. Also, I live in Australia (Melbourne) and we have been in lockdown for more than 300 days…..there are some good uses. Yes it is very expensive still but its very accurate….to me anything less accurate is worse than a waste of time and money.

      Reply

      FrankW

      3 years ago

      No doubt both are quality units. Will be interesting to see what the maintenance costs are with both, as Foresight may charge something to keep the software current, etc. But at $800 a year that a 5 year break even ownership on the GC3 VS Bushnell LP

      Reply

      KevinS

      3 years ago

      I think that would depend. If the QC3 requires a separate FSX license, that alone would be 3k, making the GC3 a 10k investment. Pending the subscription prices stay the same, it would take close to 9 years to break even.

      Reply

      KevinS

      3 years ago

      I stand corrected, it appears the GC3 will include a license. I guess the question becomes will upgrades be at zero cost.

      Chris

      3 years ago

      “$2,999 gets you a Bushnell Launch Pro with basic functionality. In this case, basic functionality means all of the ball data metrics, no head data, and output that is limited to a single shot on the Launch Pro’s LCD display. There’s no ability to store, export, or otherwise retain data.”

      Looks like spin axis is locked, so do they lock that out of the box and need a subscription to obtain that information? Also, if that is true, does that mean when you see the shot display, does it not show amount offline from curvature or does it show that but just not show that particular measurement to you?

      Reply

      Stefan

      3 years ago

      I am wondering this too

      Reply

      L. John Miller

      3 years ago

      I mat be out of bounds but maybe I reflect some if the mgs members when I say…. I’m fed up.. I’m fed up w all sports being data driven crazy. …… I know it matters …. But seriously…..what would $3k in lessons do for the majority of mgs readers…. Can we slice and dice data on swing coaches, PGA pros and teaching centers…wouldn’t that speed up play, solve the distance crisis and lower the national debt …all at the same time ?

      Reply

      FrankW

      3 years ago

      Personally i don’t consider it an either or situation. But simply a way to measure progress or lack there of. Haven’t read a single thing where manufacturers are saying any LM will replace lessons.

      Reply

      UsedToBeASlicer

      3 years ago

      I don’t think you’re out of bounds. I do think that these devices are more geared toward the “serious” golfers who would like a home simulator set up. Not sure how many 20+ players are going to be dropping $3k+ on a LM hoping to improve their swing. Maybe I’m out of bounds. : )

      Reply

      Tony F

      3 years ago

      Straight down the middle ! ;-)

      Unless you already have some knowledge of golf dynamics and a little talent, these devices aren’t going to fix a ‘hacker’s’ swing, only a golf coach would..

      Mike

      3 years ago

      For the GC3 Perpetual license model, does it include upgrades to the FSX software or do you have to pay an annual fee?

      Reply

      John Bozeman

      3 years ago

      One thing I am unclear on with the GC3. Will GC3 buyers own an FSX2020 license after purchasing? If a new foresight launch monitor comes out in a few years and you want to upgrade do you get to transfer your software license?

      Reply

      Tom S

      3 years ago

      > As far as the pricing part goes, the Foresight GC3 will set you back $6,995. I think we can safely assume that not everyone has $7K to spend on a launch monitor. I’m pretty sure that’s about what a new Yugo cost back in the day.

      HA! My first new car was a 1981 Honda Accord, and it cost $6,250.

      Reply

      Richard

      3 years ago

      Looks pretty impressive. Pricing is interesting. Pay up front or 5 years subs to be equal.

      Reply

      Larry London

      2 years ago

      Bushel website price for an unlocked GC3 is $3995. Wondering why Foresight is 7k if both items are the same.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Balls
    Apr 22, 2024
    Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
    Golf Technology
    Apr 21, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
    News
    Apr 20, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Toura Golf Club Build Test
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.