Golf Patent: Srixon’s Internally Weighted Adjustable Driver Head
Drivers

Golf Patent: Srixon’s Internally Weighted Adjustable Driver Head

Golf Patent: Srixon’s Internally Weighted Adjustable Driver Head

We haven’t covered golf patents in a while, but yesterday we found something cool that I thought was worth sharing.

The idea, which comes from Srixon, is for a Golf Club Head with Interior Weight Adjustable in Multiple Directions. It’s the latest patent application for an idea that dates back to at least 2014. There’s no guarantee Srixon plans to bring the design to market, or that the design itself is even feasible. But, given that it’s been quite some time since we’ve seen anything unique from an adjustability standpoint, we thought it was worth a closer look.

As the images suggest, one embodiment of the design includes an internal primary weight affixed to a series of struts. The position of the weight can be manipulated using a ball-in-socket joint connected to the weight. Adjustments would be made by way of an external mechanism or mechanisms that would almost certainly look like small screw ports.

The crux of the idea is that the adjustment mechanisms would allow for the weight to be moved in any direction; front to back, left to right, up and down, and theoretically, in any combination. Consider it the ultimate in three-dimensional adjustability.

If you’re wondering how the user would know the precise position of an internal weight he can’t see, Srixon has an answer for that.

The golf club head may further include a sensor coupled to or disposed within the weight and configured to generate and emit an electronic signal associated with the position of the weight within the interior chamber.

There’s been talk of putting sensors in clubheads for years, but to date, nothing viable has come of it. This isn’t exactly an onboard club head monitor, but it does give us a sense of where the technology might be headed.

Possible Challenges

It should go without saying that there are some obvious challenges with the design. The images suggest plenty of moving parts and given what golf club heads go through, durability is absolutely a concern.

While the choice of materials could potentially reduce the burden, there appears to be a significant amount of structure required to make it work. Structure comes with a mass cost, and that could limit the effectiveness of the design.

Along the same lines, the images suggest a significant portion of the mass would be allocated in the center of the clubhead, which is exactly where designers don’t want it. That could limit the ability to push weight to the perimeter, and there’s not much value in moving weight around the center of a club head. The effectiveness of any movable weight design ultimately boils down the amount of mass and the distance over which it’s being moved. To be effective, you need to move a meaningful amount of weight over a large area.

Finally, internal structures bring with them acoustic challenges. It’s not easy to make a driver sound good when you’ve got a whole lot of stuff on the inside. I suspect that would prove to be an even bigger issue when those structures are designed to move.

And all off that’s before we talk about consumer comprehension concerns.

Will this come to market?

There are dozens if not hundreds of applications like this one floating around the golf industry. Many are several years away from being used in viable products, and others are just cool ideas that may ultimately go nowhere. We certainly can’t say where this one is headed; it’s only a matter of time before someone brings an internally adjustable driver to market.

Stay tuned…

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Wally

      6 years ago

      I think that it’s a good marketing tool and really that about it. A lot of people that I know have adjustable drivers and once they set it they usually don’t play around too much with it. Considering how short the cycles are between drivers, “there’s always something better around the corner that promises more distance and forgiveness”.

      Reply

      Nick Aquilino

      6 years ago

      Couple points about patents and the patent process that the readers may find to be interesting. First of all a lot of applications never are patented because it is determined by the Patent Office (PTO) that the invention is already known. Only the first to invent receives a patent. Second there are man more patents and applications that never see the marketplace. For example, the search I mentioned in my previous e-mail considered some 45,000 patents or applications. There is some duplication but bottom line there are a lot of different ways to make a golf club or club head that never get to the assembly line.

      Finally, pending applications eventually become available for viewing by the general public enabling anyone to use the structure that does not become patented.

      Reply

      tom

      6 years ago

      Correct, because the applicants simply let them after the 6 month time frame of prosecution i.e., to be abandoned (e.g., applicants couldn’t get around the Examiner’s rejection; applicants run out of money; company went bankrupt; and many other reasons). However another option applicants can do is file a continuation before the original application goes abandoned in order to keep the original filing date of the abandoned patent application. I saw that happen all the time when I was an examiner for the USPTO. Aside note: I bet the attorney wrote claims that were too broad in scope that the examiner had not problem rejecting; but in this case, this application was nailed based on the new requirements of 35 USC 101 which discloses whether an invention, based on the claims, statutory.

      Reply

      Joel

      6 years ago

      While I don’t expect this driver will ever come to market, good on them for messing around with an idea that’s totally different from what’s in the market today.

      As a future engineer, I like seeing the ideas that club companies have that they may never even make. (Often, pieces of these ideas end up in a production product somewhere down the line, so even if it’s not going to work in this execution of the concept, who knows where it may lead!)

      Cool post Tony. Thanks for the share!

      Reply

      Mike

      6 years ago

      That seems like a whole lot of technology that would be wxpensyand likely fail after a few hits or loosen. Pros just do hot melts which is basically the same thing.

      Reply

      mackdaddy

      6 years ago

      Seems like a great idea if they can work out the engineering

      Reply

      Nick Aquilino

      6 years ago

      I just did a patent search at the USPTO and I can tell you there are many ways to adjust the weight of a golf club head. I also agree that the Srixon system is likely to fail after multiple strikes or at least move the weight slightly to provide inconsistent results. In addition the cost of the proposed head seems way out of line unless it will be offered as an expensive premium model.

      Reply

      Bird

      6 years ago

      I don’t think anyone is really trying to move the CG farther up, if they were, we would see drivers with weights on the top instead of the bottom, or both. I don’t think this will ever get made. It would be too expensive, too complicated, too delicate, and not provide any significant advantage.

      I think PXG Has done adjustability perfectly. All the weight is at the bottom, and you can Move any amount of the weight forward, back, left or right, And easily adjust swingweight by simply swapping screws.

      Reply

      Doug

      6 years ago

      I kind of like the idea of internalizing the adjustments and keeping the head body a little cleaner (and easier to clean), but I think I’d be worried too about everything coming unglued after a few too many strikes. We can’t get a car to stay in piece when it’s not running into things, after all, so I’d be surprised that constant shock doesn’t break down the tightness of the components!

      Reply

      Divot

      6 years ago

      The question I have is does having a weight in the actual center of the club head provide any advantage over having a weight on the perimeter of a club head. Could this impart a better low spin advantage as the weight is move forward towards the club face? The more forward the weight gets placed, the bigger the spacing between the actual center of the head and the perimeter of the club head.

      Reply

      Stump

      6 years ago

      That’s a lot of moving parts to have to go through a 100mph collision every time your hit the ball. I cannot imagine the internals lasting very long before they start to come apart.

      Reply

      tom

      6 years ago

      Reviewing this patent application 14/488,140 in the USPTO public pair database, this case was clobbered by the Examiner’s final rejection i.e., 35 USC 101 and 103(a) mailed on 07/10/16 then later abandoned on 01/24/17. In other words, this invention under this application will not be a patent. How I know this is because I was examiner for 14 years.

      Reply

      Doug

      6 years ago

      Did Wilson submit something similar? My entry to DvD S2 involved internal weighting. Patent pending i guess.

      TheRod

      6 years ago

      Is it a cool concept? Sure. And it’ll boost sales telling the average joe they can alter the weighting in the club, giving them the feeling that they are designing their own stuff. But aren’t we already doing that, albeit with external weighting? And the big thing for me is…haven’t we also proven that moving weight around farther from the face and cg has a bigger impact on performance? If moving weights around ON the sole and ON the back of the head has a bigger impact on performance, what are we gaining here? It’s a cool concept, I can go along with that. But my engineering mind wants to wonder if we’re actually gaining anything from the performance perspective…? Or is it purely a sales gimmick?

      Reply

      BR

      6 years ago

      Kinda reminds me of Wishon 715 CLC driver introduced in 2005….

      Reply

      Waazzupppp

      6 years ago

      Looks like a neat concept, but how long before the rattles start on the inside?

      Reply

      D.A.

      6 years ago

      $$$$$$$$$ for miss hits slices and duck hooks… golf industry is fueled by amateurs who will spend money on this Bullshit and the Major Brands are always looking for a gimmick to increase sales PGA players are in a class where they receive money to hawk the new equipment Tks for info Tony sucker born everyday W.C. Fields

      Reply

      Caroline

      6 years ago

      Would agree, now we have the Golf Channel giving us the Driver vs. Driver show again….only question is what kind of deal is Wilson going to offer to trade in the 1st. D>V>D (Triton) any one bought, if you never tried one you are missing out on absolutely nothing.

      Reply

      Tom Stevens

      6 years ago

      Good points.

      Reply

      KM

      6 years ago

      Think it would hold up?

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.