TESTED: Matrix MFS 5 Series Shafts
Golf Accessories

TESTED: Matrix MFS 5 Series Shafts

TESTED: Matrix MFS 5 Series Shafts

MFS – The Next Generation

Evolution is inevitable. Case in point, this Matrix’s release of a new generation of its popular MFS (Matrix Flight System) shafts. The 3-shaft series includes the notoriously low-spinning Black Tie (M5), the mid-launch Red Tie (Q5), and the high launch/mid spin White Tie (X5). Building off input from tour players, its advisory staff, and premium fitting accounts, Matrix has tweaked the updated designs with enhanced lower resin, ultra-high modulus material with the goal of optimizing the launch characteristics of each shaft while creating a little more space between them.

MATRIXFMS-100-2

In simple terms, the company wanted to provide more separation between the individual models; the Black Tie should be lower launch than the previous model, while the White should launch higher. Red stays in the middle.

The MFS Breakdown

Before we get to the data, let’s take a closer look at each of the shafts in the MFS 5 lineup to see where it fits in the lineup and who Matrix believes is the target golfer.

M5 Black Tie:

MATRIXFMS-101

The stiffest of the three profiles in the MFS family, the Black Tie has been re-engineered to produce lower launch and spin with an improved feel. This is accomplished through a medium firm butt section with stiffer mid and tip sections. The Black Tie is best suited for aggressive swingers who generate at least stiff-level clubhead speed.

Some testers commented that the Black Tie felt stiffer than both the Red and the White, though I would add the boardiness of the M3 is all but gone. Our data (below) suggests that many testers struggled to bring the ball back to center with the stiffer profile.

Q5 Red Tie:

MATRIXFMS-102

The mid-launch/mid-spin option (relative to the M5 and Q5) of the MFS family, the Q5 has the firmest butt section in the MFS family. However, the shaft softens quickly as the design transitions to a constant stiffness mid-section before tapering to a more active (softer) tip section.

As you’d expect from a shaft in the middle of a lineup, the Q5 is well-suited for a wide variety of swing types and players looking for mid launch and mid spin.

X5 White Tie:

MATRIXFMS-103

Compared to the X4, the X5 offers improved stability without sacrificing the smooth feel that the White Tie is known for. It’s a profile is designed to produce high launch with moderate spin. This is accomplished via the softest butt section in the MFS lineup, along with medium firm mid and tip sections.

The profile is well-suited for smoother tempo players of any swing speed looking for a bit higher launch without excessive spin. The White Tie is also a popular choice as a fairway wood shaft.

While feel is notoriously subjective, our testers did comment on the smoother feel of the White Tie, many saying it felt easier to swing.

THE DISCLAIMER

Before we get to the details and the results of our test, it’s important that we again point out that golf shafts will perform differently for different golfers, and as such, data from our shaft tests seldom aligns perfectly with the manufacturer’s stated expectations. A variety of golfer-dependent variables including, but not limited to, speed, tempo, transition, and release point will impact how a shaft will perform for an individual golfer. So, while we actively encourage experimentation with your equipment, we wouldn’t advise spending big money on any shaft without first spending some quality time with a reputable fitter.

How We Tested

MATRIXFMS-105

  • 5 Testers with handicaps from Scratch and 6 participated in this test.
  • The swing speeds of our testing pool ranged from just under 100 to upwards of 115.
  • All testers hit stiff flex shafts within the 60g range.
  • Shafts were outfitted with Club Conex UNI-FIT adapters, Golf Pride MCC Plus 4 Grips, and all shots were hit with the same 10.5° driver head.
  • With our algorithms adjusted to be more aggressive in dropping shots to provide a more consistent data sample, outliers were removed using Median Absolute Deviation.
  • To establish a reasonable baseline for our comparison, we used impact location data from the Foresight GC2 HMT to further limit our averages to only those shots struck within the central region of the club face.
  • Shots were recorded using a Foresight GC2 Launch Monitor with attached HMT.
  • All testers hit Bridgestone B330-RX Golf Balls.

Matrix MFS 5 Series Shaft Data

Observations:

  • While the averages are similar across all shafts and most metrics, the individual golfer breakdown (also provided) shows a more significant variation in performance between shaft models.
  • While not universally true, independent of launch variables, we very often find that one shaft stands out for being appreciably better, or appreciable worse for given tester.
  • The data generally support our conclusions from previous shaft tests – the shaft that a golfer hits most left will often be the one that spins least.
  • Within our data, it is the Black Tie which would seem to have produced the most unexpected result. In digging deeper, we found that a majority of our testers found it more difficult to square the face relative to the path, resulting in higher launch, more fade bias (right-favoring axis tilt) and with that, higher backspin.
  • In normalizing the data to a consistent 12° launch, we find that the Black Tie is the lowest spinning, followed by White, and then Red. Essentially – the results are as described by Matrix, provided we bring the data closer to an all things equal comparison.

The Recommendations

As we always do, we recommend you visit a qualified fitter instead of blindly buying your next shaft. It’s far too easy to throw your money away. That said we will offer broad recommendations based on our findings.

  • As Matrix claims, the Black Tie is best suited for aggressive swingers, though we would add it’s likely best suited for someone who might otherwise fight a hook. If you have a too-high spin problem caused by a weak fade or otherwise flaring the ball out to the right, the Black Tie isn’t likely to reduce your spin.
  • The White Tie is noteworthy for its smoother feel and its accuracy. While we won’t suggest it will be the straightest for our golfers, among our test pool it was the most accurate. The data suggests the White Tie may be your best chance to mitigate a fade.
  • The Red stands-out, perhaps, for being different from the other two. It’s your middle of the bell curve option. The data is anything but definitive here, which is why I’m inclined to suggest that the Red Tie is your best bet when neither the Black or White Tie works well for you.

Specs, Pricing, and Availability

mfs-spec

Matrix MFS 5 Shafts are available through authorized Matrix dealers and most OEMs. Retail Price is $350 per shaft.

For more information, visit Matrixshafts.com.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Golfinnut

      7 years ago

      I agree with the findings of the Black Tie. I have one & I cannot square the face for the life of me. Everything is left out to the right unless I really aggressively come through the shot, which requires me to change my swing. So needless to say that one is sitting in the corner with all the other shafts that don’t work. HA!

      Reply

      Gorden

      7 years ago

      It would be neat if some real tour players could give their two cents about golf equipment instead of all the BS comments we amateurs write in about every piece of equipment or ball the Golf Spy test for us…

      Reply

      Uhit

      7 years ago

      A real tour player testing shafts:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCEktB7tpaE

      did this help?

      Reply

      xjohnx

      7 years ago

      I agree it would be cool but you, and the rest of us, don’t swing anything like a tour player. It’s just as irrelevant as getting shaft advice from your grandfather.

      Second. Shafts are pretty much the only thing you can rely on for player preference on tour. I have not heard yet of any tour player having a contract to play shafts from a certain manufacturer. Whatever shaft a player has in their driver is about all the endorsement you’d need. Also, if you learn anything at all from this, it’s that the latest and greatest shafts are necessarily going to fit you any better than older ones. Many guys on tour are playing 5-10 year old shafts in their woods.

      Reply

      Dave

      7 years ago

      No such thing , club head speed produces spin.

      Reply

      craig

      7 years ago

      There is no shaft on the planet that can produce spin. Spin is generated when hitting the ball with a club head and not with a shaft. Try hitting the ball with a shaft only and see how much spin you get. It is all marketing bullshit.

      Reply

      MikeyB

      7 years ago

      Notable is those with higher launch angles and lesser swing speeds managed total distance numbers equal with those swinging 10 mph faster.
      While swing speed does indeed impact on distance, obviously the ability to channel that speed effectively makes all the difference. The 8,9,10 degree launch angles are looking for big run out numbers for total yardage. Since most local munis and even semi-private courses do not have PGA quality fairways, this approach seems to provide little benefit. Had this group maybe teed their balls higher or had better angles of attack, it may very well have picked up 20 yards, and gotten many into the 290-300 yard category.
      Again, this type of length on local courses would have a very positive impact on scores, since this would be at least one club, and almost two clubs less or approach shots.

      Reply

      bert pit

      7 years ago

      Good point. A good smash factor and launch angle can have a great effect on carry distance. Efficiency is more than clubhead speed alone.

      Reply

      Matt

      7 years ago

      Quote from e-mail sent…

      “High launch? Low Spin? It’s what most of us want, and shaft manufacturers know it.

      Can the shafts in the Matrix Flight System deliver either of those things for absolutely every golfer?”

      Really?

      I don’t recall any golfer asking for this until Taylormade came out with their “Loft Up” campaign several years ago and made the statements of high launch and low spin.

      It is the manufacturers telling us what we want as a marketing exercise that suits the Pro Golfers. That may not suit the average club golfer.

      With now, low spin irons as well are coming into the market. So much that at times there is not enough spin on the ball to hold a green and you end up running off the back or sides of the green. Or even with tee shots, your ball doesn’t stop rolling and the fairway slope design then funnels your ball straight into the rough or a water hazard.

      Reply

      xjohnx

      7 years ago

      For the record, high launch and low spin was DEFINITELY a thing before SLDR. I agree that they maybe helped mass-market the idea but people were chasing this since the dawn of launch monitors and ball data. TM just capitalized on this since their premature SLDR driver was not as refined as they would have wanted and they had to put a “spin” on it. (read the MGS article about the rise and fall of TM, it’s great.)

      Couldn’t agree more about the irons thought…..

      Reply

      T.J. Hodnett

      7 years ago

      Great great read (as usual) Tony. I currently game a Kuro Kage shaft in my M2, but when I’m struggling or need a little “extra help”, I switch to my White Tie. I lose a bit of distance on the roll out because of the higher trajectory (sometimes), but I know I can keep the ball in the fairway with minimal effort. It seems a few of the testers had similar success. All in all, it’s a great shaft and would recommend it to anyone needing a change.

      Reply

      KM

      7 years ago

      High launch is OK when theres no wind, the longer the ball stays in the air the more off line it can go, what about mid height and high roll on the ground where thers less trouble?

      Reply

      Bob Pegram

      7 years ago

      It depends on the way the course is set up. On a course with narrow fairways and high rough you don’t want a lot of roll. The ball could roll into the rough or other hazard. Obviously on a course with wider fairways roll is good.
      Also, a higher launch often means more carry, nullifying the stopping power of softer fairways.

      Reply

      xjohnx

      7 years ago

      So you’re going to give up carry yards because you might play on a windy day every now and then? Nobody goes into a fitting with this mindset.

      If you hit two setups the exact same overall distance but carried one ten yards further, which one are you going to buy?

      Reply

      Steven T.

      7 years ago

      What about the senior golfer with swing speeds in low 80s-high 70s?

      Reply

      Guy Crawford

      7 years ago

      Great reivew and breakdown of the MFS5 and really the entire shaft industry!

      Reply

      Kerry Cole

      7 years ago

      I wish you guys would use testers that had a swing speed of around 89 to 92. Most of us older guys don’t swing as fast as your testers do…at least I don’t so it is harder to relate to your testing results..

      Reply

      David W

      7 years ago

      I play a Matrix Radix S6, Stiff, 1/2 inch short in my Ping G30 and have a lot of control (more than any other driver I have ever owned). I have an M1 that I hit much further but with less consistency and a much lower flight (no matter how far back I move the weight). I was recently offered a fantastic deal on a slightly used White Tie, 60, Stiff, standard length with an M1 tip on it and so I bought it. Haven’t had a chance to hit it yet, but I’m looking forward to seeing if it helps me as much as the Radix did in my G30. I know the 1/2 inch short also helps and I have a contact that can cut it and weight it for me if I decide to.

      Reply

      John Muir

      7 years ago

      Nice job on the full length golf shaft “beauty shots”. It’s really tough to get a good shot of the entire shaft and those pics were great. I was surprised how far offline the ill-fitting shafts were for a few of the golfers. He obviously has a good swing (only a few yards offline with two shafts).

      John Muir

      Reply

      Perra Sandström

      7 years ago

      So the shaft that should give the highest launch gave the lowest in the group data. Strange.

      Reply

      MyGolf Spy

      7 years ago

      It’s really not strange at all. In fact, we see it quite often. Shaft marketing is, I think, over-simplified. Nearly everyone understands the idea of low launch/low spin for example, but on a comparative basis, it only works that way when all things are equal, and in golf, nearly nothing is truly all things equal. So what you get here is a case where a shaft that would be low spin proved difficult for a portion of our testers to ‘turn over’ (hate that description, but it’s the best we have). Delivery with a more open face produces higher impact loft and with it, more spin. Conversely, a shaft with a softer mid and tip sections was shown to be easier for our test pool to square up, resulting in less dynamic loft (lower launch/lower spin), and a more left-side bias. We generally find that when you get past all the stuff about the launch and spin characteristics of the shaft, the reality is that the one you hit most left (or at least have the greater tendency to draw) will almost invariably prove to the be one that spins least. – TC

      Reply

      David W

      7 years ago

      Excellent explanation. Basically, if you are going to spend the money for a driver, pay the fee to hit multiple shafts and be fitted for the correct one because the numbers don’t match every swing.

      Bob Pegram

      7 years ago

      If the testers were allowed to do some swing adjustments before testing the Black Tie shafts, the results may have been different. When I fit people with higher swing speeds and they try low launch, low spin shafts because their current driver isn’t working well, they often initially fade the ball as you describe. After some adjusting they often hit the low launch shaft the farthest when their swing speed matches the shaft being tested.

      Brian Jay Murra

      7 years ago

      MyGolf Spy this is the best explanation I’ve read and makes perfect sense looking back on all my driver/shaft testing. Thank you!

      Reply

      Ben Palmer

      7 years ago

      I’ve got the older version of the shafts from matrix and live them. I’m normally a low launch/soon golfer but since I place a high launch shaft in my driver and 4 wood I picked up stupid carry and distance without having to re-work my swing.

      Reply

      xjohnx

      7 years ago

      I back the disclaimer from MGS 100% and testing shafts like this is really tough. I have to say I’m still surprised to see the black tie spinning highest on average for 6 out of 6 testers.

      I’m one of those crazy guys who is always testing new shafts and I’ll admit, I don’t really know what I’m after half the time. I think I just enjoy trying new things. This is a great reminder that I need to chill the heck out and just stick with the one that stays in the fairway.

      Reply

      JasonA

      7 years ago

      The conclusion sounds aligned to that manufactures press release.

      The players DATA suggests that golfer “BC” should use Black Tie and all the others are longer and straighter in White Tie.

      5 out of 6 is notable in that is likely most golfers will respond well to White Tie when placed in that driver head.

      Reply

      Mr. Roboto

      7 years ago

      So, in actuality, the black tie would result in the lowest launch if players were able to square the face and similarly would have resulted in much less backspin as well. I’m glad that was clarified as this is the reason I do not trust player testing. The numbers MUST be interpreted for a number of variables based on how the players actually hit the shots in order to give a fair assessment of how the product performed. Even balls struck 1/4 to 1/2″ higher or lower on the face but still in the center can produce seemingly significant variances in launch and spin. Therefore…. I still strongly prefer swing machine data. I guess the big take from this is, If you have a fade now, maybe steer away from the black tie. If you struggle with a hook, maybe give it a try.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      7 years ago

      Lyle – I understand your point, and certainly with shafts what we’re looking for is a bit different than what we’re looking for with our standard club tests, which is why we filter more aggressively than when quantifying forgiveness is part of the equation. I roll my eyes when I read shaft reviews where everything breaks down EXACTLY how the OEM says it should (with more than 1 or 2 testers, we almost never see that), or when somebody claims the get the same launch and a 500 RPM spin reduction by moving to super stiff tip shaft. It just doesn’t work like that. As I keep telling people, the shaft doesn’t work like a dial on top of the club, you can’t just turn down the spin without other implications. Just like with clubs, launch and spin are closely correlated.

      But as far as the robot thing goes…I haven’t found anyone yet who actually believes you can get reliable/meaningful shaft data from a robot. As with club testing, robots are great for creating data on which to make claims, but they tell us little about how a shaft will perform for humans – which is kind of a big deal since, for now anyway, it’s still the humans who are playing golf.

      Over the years, we’ve talked with R&D guys at PING, Callaway, Cobra, TaylorMade. We’ve talked to Tom Wishon, and we’ve talked to fitters who’ve done a fair amount of research on the subject as well. There is universal agreement here that robots do not replicate the loading and unloading (plus elements of feel) of humans. Did you, for example, know that robots will show little to no variation in performance between a light flex shaft and an x-flex? The same is true for weight. These things that make a big difference for humans, barely register, if at all, with robots. It’s a good part of the reason why Fujikura developed the ENSO system.

      There aren’t any perfect answers, robots show next to nothing, humans introduce variables. With the latter at least we can narrow, and work backward to see how various swing parameters correlate with shaft performance – and of course, you can filter to create something closer to robotic conditions without losing the realities of how the shaft moves from transition through the downswing in human hands.

      Ultimately, I’m hoping we can start to remove some of the mythology around the golf shaft. We’ve got a couple of things in the works that I think will bring us closer to doing just that, but as Tiger is fond of saying, “It’s a process.”

      Reply

      JASONA

      7 years ago

      Completely agree that robot shaft tests would miss the point. Manufacturers need them for qualification purposes (design process & reliability) but that’s it.

      Question is which shaft is a Golfer able to…
      * swing more consistently
      * middle the ball
      * commit to the swing (for speed)

      Problems a robot does not have. Reason I personally work well with FUBUKI soft tip & butt section compared to other shafts is when I get timing wrong I still go left. But not the OB type left I used to. Other than that miss swing I’d play a firmer overall feel.

      Tony Covey

      7 years ago

      I think your comment does a great job of showing the disconnect between how shafts are often marketed and what they actually do, and what good fitters are actually looking for when they fit shafts. High launch/low spin…that doesn’t really exist as there is a direct correlation between the two. It’s also rare that we see significant distance differences between shafts. While there are always exceptions (sometimes a shaft just works really well), differences are most appreciable when we look at dispersion patterns, which are a product of the consistency with which a golfer can deliver any given shaft.

      So within that context, I think golfers should think less about the launch and spin characteristics of the shaft (leverage the head as much as possible to get those dialed in) and think about shafts more in the context of a tuning mechanism that can help create consistent delivery, tighter dispersion, and ultimately more balls in or closer to the fairway.

      Steve S

      7 years ago

      Ah, Tony, finally someone who agrees with me. I have found that the shafts make little differences in my actual distance but can affect the shot shape and dispersion dramatically. Remarkably I get lots of arguments from folks that should know better but not anyone who understands the physics of hitting a golf ball.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.