MyGolfSpy Labs: The Arccos Putting Study
Labs

MyGolfSpy Labs: The Arccos Putting Study

MyGolfSpy Labs: The Arccos Putting Study

Want to be a better putter?

How many times after a round have you muttered: “If I could’ve have made just a couple more putts…?” Would you have broken 80, 90, 100, or whatever your magic number is?

We’ve all been there. Probably recently.

Lost in the fascination with the Strokes Gained analysis and methodology (which suggests the farther you hit it, the better off you’re going to be) is the fact that competent putting saves rounds. There’s a correlation between good putters and good golfers.

We have the data to prove it.

We’ve partnered with Arccos Golf, creators of the industry’s leading golf performance tracking platform, to examine putting statistics throughout its community and vast database. Today we want to uncover some putting truths from the Arccos Community. The goal is to provide everyday golfers with some putting improvement strategies that are just a bit more robust than “practice more.”

arccos-50-mil-banner

About The Data

Before we get to the data, here are a couple of quick notes about its origins:

  • Putting data was pulled from Arccos’ extensive database of more than 50 million shots.
  • The data utilized in this report comes from golfers with a minimum of five rounds played on the Arccos platform.

Overall Putting By Handicap

overall-putt-pctg-handicap

The data suggests that while it’s true the lowest handicap group of players covered in this study (+5 through 1 or “Scratch or Better”) are indeed the best putters, they aren’t the most consistent. When considering two-putt percentage, our group of 1-4 handicap players (for the sake of this study, let’s call them low single digit) are the most consistent. Our Low Single Digit group two-putts 68 percent of greens as compared to our Scratch or Better group, which two-putts only 64 percent of greens.

Perhaps more interesting, the Low Single Digit group is also less likely to three-putt than the Scratch or Better golfers. In fact, the Scratch or Better group three-putts at a similar rate as the group of 4-10 handicappers included in the study.

What does this mean? At a minimum, it raises the question of whether it’s better to play conservatively for the sake of consistency and preserving score or take a more aggressive approach with the understanding it may lead to a higher percentage of thee-putts.

The Arccos data suggests that the lowest handicap golfers tend to be more aggressive. Do better players attempting birdie putts with the mindset of back of the cup instead of cozy? Could this approach help lower your handicap?

Average Number of Putts After GIR

feb-putting-article-graphics.004

Not surprisingly, the average number of putts per green in regulation increases steadily with handicap. There are two reasonable assumptions that likely explain this:

  • Better golfers are generally better putters.
  • Better golfers hit better shots into green leaving themselves with less ground to cover with the putter.

The Ideal Approach range

As we suggested above, putting performance isn’t tied solely to what happens on the green. Often, your putting stats are influenced by the positions you put yourself in off the tee and with your approach shots.

Standard methodology, perhaps even the conventional wisdom, suggests that you’re best served by managing your game such that your approach shots come from as close to the green as possible.

For amateur golfers, the data from Arccos suggests otherwise.

Without question, the approach range from which golfers in the Arccos community putt best after hitting in from is 150-200 yards.

feb-putting-article-graphics.006 feb-putting-article-graphics.007

On par 3s and 4s, the highest percentage of two-putts and lowest percentage of three-putts come after users hit their approach shots from 150-200 yards.

feb-putting-article-graphics.008

On par 5s, approaches from inside 100 yards accounted for the most two-putts, but it’s notable that more birdie putts (counted as one-putts in our study) came from the 150-200 range.

 

Putts Per Green in Regulation By Approach Distance

feb-putting-article-graphics.005

Overall, the lowest number of putts (2.12) following a Green in Regulation come from the 150-200 yard range.

So, what does this mean? For starters, it should move course management a bit higher up your priority list. Hitting the approach shots from a distance that allows for a full swing was likely a benefit for the golfers included in the study.

While it’s surely not going to hurt you much to hit your approach shots from inside 100 yards – after all, the range accounts for quite a few one and two-putts – the 150-200 yard range allows for a full swing, and is still manageable for a large percentage of golfers.

Regardless of skill level, playing to areas of strength is going to help lower scores. The Arccos data suggests that 150-200 yards is the most favorable range.

The Takeaway: Two Key Strategies

The Arccos putting data suggests there are two areas of focus that can help improve your putting stats and ultimately lower your scores.

  • Be aggressive on birdie putts. While the temptation may be to avoid mistakes, the data suggests better putters aren’t always thinking cozy. They go for it.
  • Manage your approach distances. Closer to the hole isn’t always better. Shots from 150-200 yards produce the highest rate of one-putts and the lowest rate of three-putts. For most, a full swing with a middle iron will produce better results than a half swing with a wedge.

Other Arccos Putting Stats

Now that we’ve reviewed what you can control, let’s look at some of the Arccos data that provides insights into aspects of the putting game over which we can’t control.

Putting Performance by Age

feb-putting-article-graphics.009

The younger you are, the more likely you are to make one-putts. High school and college-aged players have the highest percentage of one-putts – one-putting nearly 12% of greens. That age group also three-putts less than any other age group included in the study.

putts-per-hole-age

When it comes to average putts per hole, data suggests that putting performance rises for young professionals (age 22-28) but trends downward as age increases. Putting performances peaks between the ages of 50-59.

Presumably, putting performance correlates to the number of rounds played. Simply put, the more you play, the better you putt – and it’s been long documented that the young professional age group plays less golf than others.

Putting Performance by Gender

The Arccos data suggests that men are better putters than women, but not by a significant margin.

feb-putting-article-graphics.011

Women average 2.2 putts after a green in regulation and 1.65 putts per hole overall compared to 2.1 putts after a GIR and 1.58 putts overall.

feb-putting-article-graphics.010

On average, men three-putt 27% percent of the time while women three-putt 38% of the time.

Putting Performance by Geographic location

When diving into golf performance data, it’s always interesting to examine geographical data. Because of seasonality, performance data often skews for locations in which golf can be played year-round.

feb-putting-article-graphics.012

Overall, golfers in the northeast are the worst putters. The average more putts per hole than any other geographical region noted in the study.

On average, Midwestern golfers putt the best. They one-putt more than 11% of greens – or roughly two per round.

We’ve also broken down regional performance for par 3s, par 4s, and par 5s.

feb-putting-article-graphics.013feb-putting-article-graphics.014 feb-putting-article-graphics.015

Just the Beginning

As you might imagine, information gathered from the Arccos community can offer tremendous insight into the amateur game. In future posts will be examining other facets of on-course play gleaned from Arccos and Arccos Driver.

For more information about those products, visit ArccosGolf.com.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Our mission is #ConsumerFirst. We are here to help educate and empower golfers. We want you to get the most out of your money, time and performance. That means providing you with equipment reviews you can trust, as well as honest reporting on the latest issues affecting the game today. #PowerToThePlayer

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Driver Ping G30 Hybrids PXG 0317
3/4 IRON PXG 0311XF 5-GW Srixon Z 565
SW PXG 0317 LW PXG 0311
Putter EVNROLL  
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Les Devitt

      7 years ago

      Love the study, very comprehensive at all levels of capability. It would be an interesting study to look at the total length of last putts across the same sample of golfers. Criteria would be:
      15 foot max.
      Tap ins count for 2 ft.
      3 putts count for -4 ft.
      Total number of feet for last putts would be measured across all skill levels. Point is in golf the longer total feet of your last putts the better your score.

      Reply

      robin

      7 years ago

      it shows that Poana grass in the Pacific is the hardest to putt on. Try putting on a muni corse at 4:00 in the afternoon with flowers on the green.

      Reply

      Artie1

      7 years ago

      The reason you get better putting results on long par 3 holes is because the challenge on a long per 3 is going to be the distance not the challenge of a green with a lot of break. If you playing a 200 yard par 3, and are the average job, you are not going to be GIR too often and the course will probably reward you for just getting on and not challenge your flat stick.

      Reply

      GolfsNotHard

      7 years ago

      I love data but I don’t think that there is a lot of value in this:

      1. Trusting selectively input data is concerning.
      2. This doesn’t take into account Par 5s being hit in two (which may account for some of the 3 putts by lower handicap players).
      3. The 100-150 yardage stat is mind boggling. I simply cannot imagine this is true.

      If it’s possible, can we please put up the equivalent data for the Tours (which is tracked on every shot)?

      Reply

      Chris C.

      7 years ago

      Once again, I ask anyone to explain how this piece of tech helps anyone improve their game. I would have thought it obvious that it is better to one putt than to three putt. Similarly, I have always thought that it is better to be closer to the pin than not. Again, how does this tech actually improve one’s game?

      Reply

      Alvaro

      7 years ago

      I can tell you, I’ve been using it a couple of rounds (Arccos 360) and my course management has definitely improved. Knowing your REAL distance shots, where’s your miss (I tend to go left and long sometimes) really helps you hit more GIR, for sure. I’ve gone up from 56% (tracked with basic hole19, not inputting misses and whatnot) to 63% GIR in about 5 rounds. I assume the project they are working on with Microsoft could actually make a real difference and truly have a caddy in your pocket. I’m super happy with the results.

      Reply

      Randy Beck

      7 years ago

      This shows midwest golfers are the best putters !

      Reply

      flatstick

      7 years ago

      No, it likely means they play on the flatter greens.

      Reply

      Edward

      7 years ago

      I am guessing only single digit handicaps are hitting GIR from 150-200 skewing the putting averages in their favor. I don’t think it has anything to do with a full swing with a 7 iron being better than a half swing with a lob wedge.

      Reply

      Rich

      7 years ago

      What about percentage of greens hit from those ranges? The putting may be better if you hit the green from 175 vs 75, but that doesn’t matter if you’re hitting 30% fewer greens.

      Reply

      Bradley Smith

      7 years ago

      Rich,
      Do you really believe that putting on GIR shots from 175 is, on AVERAGE, better than from shorter distance GIR shots? That is just about impossible to believe. Everyone I’ve ever played with will hit it closer from 75 AND hit far, far more GIR from 75. Lower score from more GIR and lower score from shorter first putts.

      Reply

      Mark Davis

      7 years ago

      This entire article (and thanks as it’s fascinating stuff!) presumes that the Arccos data is accurate, the reporting is accurate and the methodology to gather, compile and analyze the data is accurate. It also presumes that a realistic sampling of data, accurately representing all golfers across all handicaps and regions, is statistically valid.

      Which, with all due respect, I doubt very much. At least, the latter point, since it ignores all golfers who do not use Arccos technology. I suspect there is a huge skew here that’s not represented. But again, thanks for a fun read.

      Reply

      Troy Parker

      7 years ago

      Wow. Brilliant and fascinating data.

      Reply

      Steve S

      7 years ago

      I think the take away here is not the 100 yards or the 150-200 yards, but the full swing. If your full swing with a pitching wedge is 100 yards and that’s your most accurate club try to play to that distance. If it’s 150 then play that. The point being that most amateurs don’t practice enough half or 3/4 swing shots to be consistently accurate.

      Reply

      Gord Thomas

      7 years ago

      Basic question, but how does Arccos measure putting . I assume it is when I player uses his putter, whether it be on the green or not . Correct ?

      Reply

      Robert

      7 years ago

      That is correct. If the ball is hit with the putter, and sometimes it counts more than that, it is counted as a putt. These stats are worthless as far as I’m concerned. I’ve never played a round with Arccos where it got my putting count on every hole correct. There is a 0.0% chance that every single entry used for these stats when back and adjusted their putting. It’s virtually impossible.

      Reply

      Dave S

      7 years ago

      Two Questions:

      1. Doesn’t the Arccos data on approach shots fly in the face of Mark Brodie’s SG Driving stats? Specifically, he showed that hitting it as far as you can is better than being more accurate and shorter. According to Arccos, on a 400 yd par4, an amature would be better off pulling a 3w they hit 240 instead of a driver they hit 270. Do you think accuracy of tee shots might be playing into this Arccos stat for amateurs? I.e. the typical amateur’s approach from 120 is more likely to be from the rough (or worse) than their typical 160 shot due to taking something off of their drive to ensure more accuracy?

      2. Is Arccos replacing TheGrint as MGS’ go-to stat gathering platform?

      Reply

      RobH

      7 years ago

      There is,a well known saying about statistics. But read Mark’s book with interest, but I don’t see it applying necessarily. In the women’s game Lydia is world no1 and one of the shortest hitters. Maybe if you look at the stats its different by sector. I.e. AM’s, women pro, men pros etc.?

      Reply

      Brad Smith

      7 years ago

      As often happens here at MGS, charts and data are poorly labeled. Example is the very first chart. It says “Overall …..” and then proceeds to show that better than scratch players average about just over 36 putts per round. Do any of us believe this to be true ON AVERAGE? If the first chart is believed to be correct, then it appears to be contradicted in the very next chart labeled “…for GIR…”. That one shows 1.925 putts/hole for those golfers. So those 2 charts, as labeled, seems to tell us that these people take fewer putts when they hit the green from distance than when their approach misses the green and they chip on. Do any of us believe this to be true on average? MGS needs to tighten up their editing/analysis of what they present. I believe that they generally have good data in front of them, but they too often label/mislabel it so it.

      Another thing they strongly imply…..if I can hit my tee shot into the fairway on, let’s say, a 325 yd par 4, to within 100 yards of the hole, I’d be better off on average teeing off with my 7 iron, leaving me 175 to the hole. Anybody believe that to be a better strategy?

      Reply

      Judd Golden

      7 years ago

      Interesting. Truisms: “You’re best served by managing your game such that your approach shots come from as close to the green as possible” and “Better golfers hit better shots into the green leaving themselves with less ground to cover with the putter.”

      Reply

      Doug

      7 years ago

      Was the putting facet handicap or overall handicap used for this analysis? I have over 80 rounds in Arccos; my putting handicap is 5.2, my overall handicap is 8.8, and my official USGA handicap 14.8. My Arccos overall handicap has never been close to my actual USGA handicap.

      Reply

      Frank Pannullo

      7 years ago

      I am a 16 and avg 28 putts per round. I drive the ball well and long enough avg around 220 yds. My approach shouts are lacking only hit about 5 greens per round

      Reply

      perry

      7 years ago

      I doubt that golfers in the Midwest are better putters than the northeast. More likely the greens are faster and have more slope in the northeast thus making them more difficult to putt.

      Reply

      Kenny B

      7 years ago

      I disagree that the greens are faster and have more slope in the northeast. All regions have courses with fast and slow greens, and greens tend to be similar is slope design. Just because the general terrain is flatter in the midwest than in the northeast doesn’t mean that greens in the midwest are easier to putt. However, I will say that the chart of Putts After A Green in Regulation by Region does show that the West, Southwest, Pacific and Northeast is interesting and likely is a result of mountain effects not present in the other regions. I live in the northwest and depending on the course, we have to consider where the mountain and valley are located. It’s like the “Indio Effect” when playing in Palm Springs. It can be a significant factor.

      Reply

      Kenny B

      7 years ago

      I just don’t buy that golfers of any age or handicap 3-putt one out of four times. Sorry.

      Reply

      Kevin L

      7 years ago

      You need to come and play with me more frequently. If all players are being considered and everything is putted out I think that it’s entirely possible that there are a number of players who average 4 or 5 3 putts per round.

      Reply

      Sam Froggatte

      7 years ago

      As I look at the numbers, I need to confirm something.
      Are they saying that a +5-1, and 1-4 handicap players 3 putt 17.5% of greens?

      Is that even possible? That would imply about 3 3-putts per round. I’m not sure it is possible to keep the low handicap with that many putting errors. The number of birdies required to overcome the 3-putts would incredible.

      Am I missing something?

      Reply

      Aaron

      7 years ago

      I can say that while the numbers look odd, its not that far off if any. I personally carry a scratch to 1 handicap and I would say I average 2-3 three putts a round if I looked at everything, not the rounds that count toward my handicap. You have to understand when you three putt it’s not always for boggy. I also am usually on par 5’s in two a couple a times a round, and most of the time they are not 5 footers for eagle, thus increasing my chance of three putting.

      Additionally, I would guess the rounds that count toward my handicap are the ones where I make my share of one putts rather than the ones where I miss the 3-4 foot putt coming back. Average and handicap are very different. While it may be hard to believe, I could have 10 rounds with 4+ three putts and none of them count in my handicap, and have 10 rounds with zero three putts, and those ten are what are used, yet over the 20 rounds you still average 2-3 three putts a round.

      The amazing thing about all of these tracking statistics are how far fetched they seem, but the data does not lie. Just watch the PGA tour and see the %’s for each putt distance and think to yourself how low that number actually is. The averages for a putt between 7 and 8 foot fall right in the 50% range, and I would guess if you asked most avid golfers (high and low handicappers), they would expect to make more than 50% themselves let alone a PGA pro. Everything is slightly worse than you think when dealing with golf stats.

      Reply

      Robert

      7 years ago

      But this data can lie. I used Arccos a bunch last year and not once did it ever get my putting stats right after the round. It can have the correct score, but wrong count of shots. I’ve seen it show I holed out for eagle on one hole and then 3 putted twice. My score would be the same if I 2 putted all of those, but going to these stats it would count the two 3 putts. I highly doubt that every single person adjusts their putting stats after the round is completed. Putting is by far the least accurate reading of Arccos and shouldn’t be used for stats like this.

      Kolin Williams

      7 years ago

      My problem is I don’t hit enough GIR. I should be between a 4-10 not a 14:(

      Reply

      John Porter

      7 years ago

      Didn’t I tell you how intuitive these ARCCOS stats are. Making GAMEGolf look obsolete.

      Reply

      John Porter

      7 years ago

      Some of the data in this article is crazy when you look at how often a scratch golfer 3-putts. I don’t feel so bad now ??

      Reply

      Robert

      7 years ago

      I have a really hard time believing the 3 putt numbers. I play with a bunch of guys that are in the +5 to 5 range and I’ve never seen any of them have more than 1 or 2 three putts in a round. These stats are saying that scratch or better avg at least 3 three putts a round. That’s inconceivable!

      Knowing how Arccos works, I’m guessing that there are a bunch of published rounds where people didn’t go clean up the putting stats that can easily get screwed up. If they see “oh it says I shot 70. That’s correct” and then publish. But I’ve had that happen and then I look at each hole and it shows an eagle on one hole while I 3 putted 2 other holes.

      Reply

      Robert

      7 years ago

      I should add that Arccos is a great tool as long as you go in and make sure it worked properly. The one item it has the most trouble with is putting. I’d be ok with it compiling stats from anything else, but I’ve never played a round with it where it got my putting stats correct on the first try.

      Reply

      JustWellsy

      7 years ago

      Pretty weak data and conclusions for such a large set. The only thing that surprised me was that the +5 to 1 hcp group 3-putts more than they 1 putt. I fall into that group and will now track these stats because I’m interested to see. I’m sure I 1-putt at least twice as much as I 3-putt, but that also takes into account how good you are around the greens.

      It would have been more interesting to see how well people putt compared to how long they hit it off the tee. The longest group off the tee might be the only one that putts better after approaches from less than 150 yards because that’s what they’re faced with nearly every par 4

      Reply

      Augustine Fan

      7 years ago

      great analysis. I just played a round where for the front 9 i played aggressively – hitting driver whenever I can and going for par 5s in two, and playing more course management on the back 9. when playing aggressive, I find myself having lots of partial approach shots below 125 that I need to pay special attention to in order to carry the right yardage, whereas when I course manage I will try to lay up to the 150 yard marker so I can use my favorite 8 iron with a full swing for the approach and resulted in much shorter 1st putts.

      my scores were comparable with both approaches – I scored and eagle on the front 9 playing aggressive but also made silly bogeys when I didn’t need to hit driver on short par 4s….

      so the bottom line is course manage most of the holes and pick a couple holes to be aggressive!

      Reply

      Mizuno

      7 years ago

      This is interesting but I’d like to understand the data source better. My feeling my when reading this is that something is not quite right. I read a stat the other day that said that only 12% (?) of recreational rounds get posted. For the vast majority of rounds, how many of those 2-3 foot putts were conceded to or by their Arccos using owners?

      Reply

      Greg C

      7 years ago

      “Closer to the hole isn’t always better. Shots from 150-200 yards produce the highest rate of one-putts and the lowest rate of three-putts. For most, a full swing with a middle iron will produce better results than a half swing with a wedge.”

      Really? I am going to hit just as many greens from 150-200 yds as I am from 100 yards and in? While saving just 0.01 putts per GIR (2.12 vs 2.13)? This may help me when I do hit the green (after 100 greens hit I would save 1 putt. It might take me 10 rounds to hit those 100 greens), hitting more greens from 100 yards in will help me more. You have to look at total shots taken from the approach shot onwards in order to determine how to lower scores, not just the number of puts taken when you do hit the green.

      The best GIR on the PGA tourn from 150-175 yds last year was 73.2%. From inside 100yds it was 92.6%. Would you rather hit 92% of greens and average 2.13 putts per GIR or hit 73.2% of greens and average 2.12 putts per GIR? Clearly I would prefer not to miss an additional 2 out of every 10 greens (or about 3.5 greens per round) than gain 0.01 putts per GIR by laying back to 150-200 yds.

      Reply

      Bignose

      7 years ago

      Greg C, you identified my major question as well. Recommending people stay 150-200 yards out is a very extraordinary claim, and requires an awful lot of extraordinary evidence and discussion.

      Reply

      golfercraig

      7 years ago

      Hmm. I’ll add to this. I like toast.

      My bad, i thought we were just throwing things in there that have nothing to do with the data present. Not a single PGA touring pro in this study. If you add the shots from the rough at 10 yards for MOST ams you’ll see why. Will the average 7 hdcp hit more greens from 150 in fairway, or 85 in ankle deep rough? I wonder. It’s almost like they added “for most” to make it clear to anyone who understands probability.

      Reply

      Bignose

      7 years ago

      golfercraig, if you’re going to talk probabilities, how many rounds are being played where ankle deep rough is common? Even most courses who pride themselves in being ‘championship caliber’ don’t grow their rough out like when amateurs are allowed on the course, because it makes the experience rather unenjoyable.

      Mark

      7 years ago

      Greg – I completely agree with your assessment. The takeaways assume that a player will hit the green at the same rate from 150-200 as <100, and that's demonstrably false.

      Reply

      Adam

      7 years ago

      Very interesting putts after GIR numbers, especially the 100-150 and 150-200 yard ranges. My theory would be that the total putts after a GIR is more of a byproduct of who is hitting GIR’s from certain distances. If the average GIR is hit with a 7 or 8 iron, than the 150-200 yard approach GIR will include better players/putters than the 100-150 yard approach GIR.

      Reply

      Paul Zajic

      7 years ago

      I’ve been considering purchasing an Arrcos. Does the system allow to compare your stats against the community as you play/enter rounds? I’ve been researching the product but haven’t found anything conclusive.

      Reply

      Mark C

      7 years ago

      It does provide stats versus the average user. If your friends have the arccos system you can follow each other which makes it more interesting

      Reply

      Rich

      7 years ago

      I LOVE my Arccos unit. You can compare your stats to any community member that you follow. It gives you handicap ratings for driver, putting, approach, sand and chipping. Great for knowing your distances and makes keeping track of your strokes even easier. Fun to review previous rounds.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.