MyGolfSpy Labs: The Driver Fitting Study
Drivers

MyGolfSpy Labs: The Driver Fitting Study

MyGolfSpy Labs: The Driver Fitting Study

The driver is typically one of the most fitted and often replaced clubs, and is usually the most-expensive club in one’s bag.  A properly fit driver can have a dramatic effect on distance, accuracy, consistency and confidence; maximizing the opportunity for optimal results. When looking at driver fitting many principles from an iron fitting carry over, but there are some unique aspects to the driver (e.g. some elements of adjustability).

The goal of this article is to prepare players for their next driver fitting by discussing what to look for during a fitting, which elements may be altered during the process, and demonstrate the benefits of a thorough driver fitting.

driver-fitting-study-head (1)

Things to Look for During a Driver Fitting

As mentioned above, driver fittings and iron fittings share similar aspects. Please reference the iron-fitting article for a more in-depth description of the following items that a golfer should pay attention to during a fitting:

  • Conversation/Interview
  • Bring current driver for comparison
  • Pay attention to what is added to the club during the fitting
  • Put a priority on ball speed instead of smash factor
  • Pay attention to which fitting elements are addressed

In addition to the above items, a few critical aspects of a driver fitting merit more discussion.

Ball flight

Most fitting environments have a way to track and record ball flight using a launch monitor, an easy and objective tool for ensuring a golfer is getting the most from a driver. Compared to other clubs, the distance a shot travels with a driver is particularly sensitive to spin rate, since the driver produces the highest ball speeds. The higher the ball speed, the greater the aerodynamic forces experienced by the golf ball. This can lead to excessive lift, or insufficient lift, which can significantly reduce distance. This phenomenon is depicted in the image below.

DriverTrajectory_Illustation

To expand on this, there are optimal combinations of launch angle and spin rate that tend to generate the greatest distances, combinations that are a function of the ball speed a player generates. Figures 2-4 show the carry distances that various combinations of launch angle and spin rate can produce for ball speeds of 100, 140, and 180 mph, respectively. Studying these figures, it is clear that for a given spin rate, carry distance increases with launch angle. Conversely, for a given launch angle you can see that minimizing spin rate may not always result in the greatest carry distances. For high-ball-speed players, minimizing spin rate can definitely lead to greater distances, but for slower to average-ball-speed players, a slightly high spin rate may ultimately lead to more carry distance off the tee.

fig-3-carry-distance-100mph
fig-3-carry-distance-140mph
fig-3-carry-distance-180mph

It should also be noted that for now we are exclusively speaking in terms of carry distance. When discussing what happens to total distance, the landing angle and typical fairway conditions can also significantly affect the amount of total distance one gains, and sometimes needs slightly lower launch/spin combinations are required to maximize total distance. These tables are also generated for a set environment (i.e. temperature, elevation, etc.), which can also change the contours by a fair amount.

Groups of Shots (instead of single shots)

Particularly with a driver fitting, golfers are inclined to be drawn to the model that produced that single “bomb” that felt better than you could’ve ever imagined and sailed 15 yards farther than anything you’ve ever hit. Although this may give an indication of what the perfect shot with a given club feels like, it may not be a good representation of the performance you would see on the course. One of the defining characteristics that trends with handicap is consistency. Generally, the lower a player’s handicap, the more consistent they are shot-to-shot. So in addition to those single shots, pay attention to groups of shots. More times than not, a fitting focuses too much on comparing the BEST shot with one driver to the BEST shot with another. This is incomplete, at best, and in many cases will add strokes to your game rather than eliminate them.

The table below compares two of the best single drives during a fitting for two different drivers. You can see that driver B had a greater total distance and optimal launch conditions, compared to driver A. Of course, the 300-plus-yard drive is enticing and is going to stay at the front of the player’s mind. That is 8 yards more than he generated with club A, so surely this is the best driver for him, right?

Although this is part of the story, it is quite a disservice to the performance of driver A. The two images below compare the eight drives with each driver during the fitting with the same two models shown in table 1. The shots are overlaid on a par 4 with a density heat map overlay at Mesa Country Club, a local course in Arizona. Looking at the data presented in this way tells a completely different story! Not only is the variance in distance much larger, driver B will have you dodging range balls on your second shot 30% of the time.

Evaluate the best shots with the different drivers you try, but analyzing the grouping of shots with each is crucial to assessing the true performance of a configured driver.

figure5
figure6

Tee Height

Tee height is important to optimizing trajectory and distance with the driver. When teed too low, the ball typically launches lower with excessive spin. When teed too high, the ball may impact high on the face, leading to a higher launch angle than desired with insufficient spin. Hitting too high or low can also significantly affect ball speed. Typically, an average tee height that places the equator of the ball even with the top edge of the driver face works best for most. Particularly in an indoor environment, it is important to ensure that one can adjust tee height and achieve a sufficient tee height during a fitting. If you are not comfortable with the tee height during the fitting, be sure to discuss this with your fitter.

Fitting Elements

A number of factors can influence distance, control and feel with a driver – performance characteristics that should be optimized during a fitting. Most fittings should address the majority of the following elements during a fitting.

Model

The center-of-mass (COM) of a driver can play a huge role in the performance characteristics of a driver. Specifically, driver models with different COM locations will have different launch and spin characteristics, which may lead to optimal ball flight for a particular player. In addition to launch characteristics, the COM location also has significant effect on the moment-of-inertia (MOI), or the forgiveness one experiences. In general, as the COM is moved farther away from the face of a driver, the higher the MOI and the launch angle, and as it is moved lower, the less spin a head will generate. Moving the COM to the heel or toe side of a driver can also have an effect on left-right trajectory. On drivers that have movable weights, a fitter may try to move weight toward the toe or heel to correct a miss tendency to the left or right. For the most part, moving the COM to the heel will generate a more right-to-left ball flight, while moving weight to the toe will lead to a more left-to-right shot shape.

Other aspects that can also influence the performance and feel of a model are the look and sound characteristics of the head. The preference of these variables is highly dependent on the player, but they can definitely lead to increased confidence and improved feel.

Loft

Loft is the angle of the clubface relative to a vertical line perpendicular to the ground. Loft has considerable influence on the launch angle and spin rate of a golf ball, although other factors such as shaft type and model also influence launch conditions. PING drivers are offered with different lofts to fit players of varying swing speeds, swing tendencies and ball-flight preferences.

Many PING metal woods, as well as many heads from other OEMs, provide the ability to adjust the loft, allowing players to fine-tune their ball flight and trajectory. PING research has shown that in general, a 1-degree increase in loft for a driver will result in a 0.7-degree increase in launch angle and a 220 rpm increase in spin rate. This relationship can be used to guide the use of adjustable loft when tuning trajectory during a fitting where launch-monitor data is available. During a fitting, the loft of the head as well as the adjustable loft setting of that head serve as important levers when dialing in ball flight.

Length

Altering the length of a driver can have a significant effect on performance. As length is evaluated, keep in mind the trade-offs in performance that can govern changes in driver length. Table 2 displays how altering length while maintaining a constant swingweight can affect performance. For example, for a 1-inch increase in length, the carry distance increases an average of 4 yards. As a general rule, an increase in length can increase distance, but will usually lead to a significant decrease in accuracy. There is also a point with most players where increasing length will lead to shorter distances due to poorer contact, though this point is highly dependent on the player.

The driver lengths used on the men’s and women’s professional tours are worth noting. For PING pros on the PGA and European tours, driver lengths range from 44.25″ to 46″, with an average of 45.25″. On the LPGA Tour, lengths range from 44.5″ to 48″, with an average of 45.25″.

Shaft

Players have a vast array of choices when it comes to shaft fitting. Various combinations of weight, flex, and torque can affect the way a shaft feels and performs. Ultimately these shaft properties can not only have a big effect on how a driver feels as it is swung and as it impacts the ball, but also can influence the trajectory that can be achieved with a given model.

Typically, fitters will base an initial driver shaft recommendation on a player’s swing speed and distance. In general, club head speed would be the best INITIAL indicator since distance can be greatly influenced by player perception and quality of contact. Although other factors (tempo, transition, impact position, etc.) may influence shaft recommendations, club head speed is a decent starting point. As you try different shafts, the fitter should solicit feedback about feel (flex, weight, impact) and performance, and evaluate how each shaft affects ball flight.

During this process of elimination, golfers should resist the urge to look at the shaft flex code (R, X, S, etc.).  Unfortunately, there are no true industry standards regarding these labels. As a result, some shafts labeled Regular are in reality quite stiff, and shafts labelled X-Stiff are quite flexible. This was mentioned in the previous article on iron fitting, but it’s a point worth repeating. PING characterizes each shaft that it offers, measuring a playable flex. Comparing shafts on a chart like the one in figure 10, it is clear there is plenty of overlap between shafts labeled with a particular flex code. As a result, it is best to not know during the shaft fitting what you are hitting so that you don’t influence your perception of the results.

Grip

Similar to irons, testing has shown that grip size can have a small influence on ball flight and the confidence a player has as they swing the club. Grips are available in a wide range of sizes, and grip-fitting charts like the PING Grip Chart provide a starting point for the fitting and offer high statistical probability of an optimal size recommendation based on measurements of the hand and fingers. Try a couple of grip sizes to determine differences in performance or feel.

Weight & Balance

The ultimate weight and balance of a driver can be influenced by the model, shaft, and grip, elements a fitter can modify to help optimize performance. If you prefer a certain feel and weight, let your fitter know. Two of the primary ways the mass properties of a driver are characterized is by total mass and swing weight. For a more in-depth description of these two variables, please see the Weight & Balance section of the iron-fitting article.

As with irons, overall swingweight can affect performance by influencing the way a club is delivered. In general, heavier swingweights and total weights tend to fight a miss to the left, while lighter clubs tend to fight a miss to the right. Most equipment manufacturers have dialed in swingweights for their drivers that provide the best performance for the overall population, but weight and balance should be part of the fitting discussion.

Performance Gains

So the big question is, how much improvement can I expect from a driver fitting? PING’s nFlight software is used by accounts around the world and gives us a great window into the performance gains that can be had through a proper driver fitting. A large sample of fittings conducted at PING over the past year shows that players averaged an increase in total driver distance of around 11 yards, and averaged 9.5 extra yards carry, with an optimally fit driver compared to the gamer they were using when they came into the fitting. As you can see from the charts, most all players gained distance, with a few exceptions where control and accuracy were a high priority.

Table 3 shows how the driver that was fit to a player varied in launch conditions to their gamer. Over the sample group, players gained a couple of miles-per-hour in ball speed, a higher launch angle, and a lower spin rate. These are averages across a sample of players, so certain individuals may have lowered their launch angle or increased spin in order to optimize ball flight.

As discussed earlier, the other critical elements in a driver fitting are dispersion and consistency; both typically improve significantly after a thorough driver fitting. Most launch monitor and fitting software includes a method for visualizing groups of shots with a particular club. Over the same sample of fittings, the dispersion area decreased by 25% on average when comparing the fitted driver to the player’s original driver.

figure13To provide a baseline for what a 25% reduction in dispersion area looks like, the representative average stat areas for the sample of players for both their fitted driver and their gamer have been overlaid on the 18th hole at Torrey Pines South in figure 13. Although at first glance this visual may not serve as a striking argument to pay attention to dispersion, keep in mind this is an average across the entire sample of players, and within that sample there are examples like the one presented in figure 7 where the differences are substantial. A few less shots out of a fairway bunker or the penal rough can definitely serve to lower scores over the course of a round.  That combined with the extra distance, which on average will allow a player to hit one less club into a green, will ensure lower scores as a result of a driver fitting.

There are clearly gains to be made in ball speed, distance, accuracy and feel through a proper driver fitting. If you’re planning to get fit for your next driver, go in with a working knowledge of what to look for during a fitting to ensure that you get the most out of the experience.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Erik Henrikson

Erik Henrikson

Erik Henrikson

Erik currently manages the Innovation and Fitting Science Department at PING Golf. He obtained his Ph.D. in 2010 from Arizona State University, where he studied plasma physics and micro-satellite propulsion. Since starting at PING in 2010 as a research engineer, Erik has played a part in the development of various technologies and projects, including iPing, Turbulators, nFlight fitting software, and the PING Custom Fitting Manual.

Erik Henrikson

Erik Henrikson

Erik Henrikson

R&D Tools: Player Testing
Sep 19, 2017 | 9 Comments
R&D Tools: PING MAN
May 22, 2017 | 17 Comments
R&D Tools: Eye tracking
Mar 8, 2017 | 14 Comments
Erik Henrikson

Erik Henrikson

Erik Henrikson

Erik Henrikson

Erik Henrikson

Erik Henrikson





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Jim

      6 years ago

      Getting a proper fitting can really benefit your overall game, but problem with the consistency of your swing during the fitting. I play pretty consistently but fight a bad back which can hinder my swing and therefore I get nervous during the fitting – that I won’t hit the ball as I normally would and therefore will be fit to something that really isn’t what I’m looking for. Last year I was fit for a new driver by the Ping rep and I just wasn’t swinging correctly. Ultimately the rep suggested I stay with my old driver as there weren’t any significant gains found with the new driver. But I walked away thinking I wasted my time because I wasn’t swinging well at all. Unless you’re a very low handicapper I find it hard to pick the correct clubs as your swing may be inconsistent.

      Reply

      Frank Szydlo

      10 months ago

      I agree with you. I suffer from a bad back and arthritic knees. Fittings are so dependent on how you’re swinging that day. I have found very few fitters who will spend multiple days with you to not only compare different settings but also how you feel that day. I ended up doing my own fitting by getting knowledgeable and knowing when I feel the session was productive.

      Reply

      Derrick Vaughn

      8 years ago

      Finding the proper Driver for my game will clearly put me in the low single digits. Driving has been the most inconsistent part of my game for several years.

      Reply

      stylin19

      8 years ago

      I just had a driver fitting. Great experience, except there was no grip fitting or ball fitting to recommended driver.
      The problem is, the new driver would be 690 bucks for a 13 yard gain with a shot dispersion not much narrow than my current dispersion ? I don’t think so.

      Reply

      J Lynn Doc Griffin

      8 years ago

      That’s why I do what I do folks!

      Reply

      Joseph Hampton

      8 years ago

      All sounds great, I don’t know of a club fitted in South Jersey where I live

      Reply

      Jerry

      8 years ago

      Interesting comments especially from golfers whose swings vary day to day. Not much you can do until your swing becomes consistent I’m afraid. For the consistent swinger like me I can only add my anecdotal comments. I’m old school. I don’t care how much longer a club is if it looks ugly and many are. Same for irons. So I “first” decided which driver I loved the “look” of. Backwards perhaps but if I’m playing I want clubs that look right when I’m at address. First the lie must be square to target. I tried lofting up but hitting a 12 degree and higher just “looks” wrong and even the launch monitor agreed ironically with lost distance compared to my 9 degree. I then experiment with shafts. The last time I did this self fitting I tried 5-6 shafts with the same head and wow after A-B hitting I narrowed it down to my selecting a final combo. Using the same head there was both dramatic distance and dispersion differences. My final choice turned out to be the longest “and” straightest. I then played a year with that driver (don’t ask what it was. It doesn’t matter. Each individual golfer needs to find his own match) and went to my local Golf Galaxy and challenged the sales guy to sell me new tech. We grabbed the two “hottest” new drivers and my old driver. Additionally we got the store Pro and I hit the three clubs. After playing with shafts and lofts I couldn’t out hit my old driver. Even the launch monitor didn’t lie. Old driver just out performed the new tech. Now, another unspoken thing is…..”wind”! In a perfect world with no wind (into, with, side) hitting a nice high ball would be peachy. But here in Iowa and two other states I often play in, Texas and Florida I’m hitting into a stiff head wind or it’s coming across the fairway. Most good players don’t want to loft up due to shot shape goals and lost distance and control into a strong wind. Kinda the same reason you hit a low 7 iron into a stiff wind instead of a pressed 9 iron. Anyway, enough about me.

      Reply

      joro

      8 years ago

      Interesting stuff that works well for the scratch and Pros, but how about the 10, 15, 20, hcpr. From what I have seen both the Guru fitting and the Guru lessons are a waste of money unless they are repetitive, every time which they are not. There is a lot more also, but whats the point, we are talking about egos.

      Reply

      Suz

      8 years ago

      It’s not about ego it’s about producing a better outcome when striking the golf ball, which in turn will provide a better outcome on the scorecard providing better confidence moving through the round. Mid to higher handicappers may not be consistent or may not have a repetitive swing but that doesn’t mean they don’t want to get better and having equipment specific to them will allow for the confidence to be a better player… to be consistent and repetitive because they will be able to actually hit the equipment better and mishits end up with a better outcome than equipment that are handme downs or off the rack.

      Reply

      The World Of Golf

      8 years ago

      Nice info thanks a lot love golf

      Reply

      Michael Slaughter

      8 years ago

      Fit club’s in general make you hit the ball further

      Reply

      Steve Klick

      8 years ago

      Ping … Play your best

      Reply

      leftright

      8 years ago

      You want the driver you can carry the furthest, period. Not the one you hit the furthest on the monitor. People say this is crap but most of the time, if the monitor is halfway right the driver you carry the furthest will translate to the monitor but not always. 9 out of 10 times if you get the driver you carry the furthest on the monitor you will be okay. If you get the one you hit the furthest with the “ideal” spin rat you will be sorely disappointed and will bring it back within a few days. There are countless stories of this happening. Spin is very important and the promotion of too little spin now has many golfers struggling to hit the driver that the monitor says is the best. When you are a touring pro you hit the best one that fits the range then take it to the course. It doesn’t always translate for some reason. I really hate to mess up all the fitters out there but the technology is not correct on many occasions. You can get a baseline but fitter should put the guy in a driver the spin numbers might be slighly high. He/she will get the best results with that driver on the course. I will be $100 everytime and will win most of the time. You might hit is slightly shorter but you will hit it further in real time.

      Reply

      leftright

      8 years ago

      I have never had a good driver fitting and have paid for 5 over the past 7 years. I took a demo out and could not hit it on the course even though the monitor said I was hitting it long and straight. I am lefthanded, play to a 3 handicap and the drive is perhaps the best club in my bag. I can literally hit any driver off the shelf. Once I was told the Exotics xcg6 was over 290 with perfect spin numbers but it didn’t translate on the course at all, same for the M1 of which I couldn’t do anything with. I use the new Ping G series LS with a Tour regular shaft. My SS averages 100 mph give or take a few decimal points and I am 59 years of age. I hit this driver on the nose everytime and straight but it’s not the longest driver. I won’t put it on the monitor because I don’t trust the technology. I think it’s overrated and I hate to use it, a scam. I personally think Tom Wishon is the biggest scam artist of all and he probably knows who I am by this post. He pushes more BS than a cattle farmer. You “must” take a driver to the course and try it. It is imperative because the monitors “lie.”

      Reply

      Mbwa Kali Sana

      8 years ago

      Couldn’t be more right:the TRUTH originates only on the golf course: the monitor CAN only give you General directions .

      Reply

      Funkaholic

      5 years ago

      I would say by your rant, your handicap is suspect and your ego was bruised by Wishon. I would bet you claim you hit a big ball but the monitors say otherwise so you rant about it foolishly. I have played with your kind many times, big talker with no game.

      Reply

      Troy

      8 years ago

      Great advice,

      Driver fitting is super important, so many golfers I see every weekend hitting drivers that are clearly not fitted for them. Every golfer is different and there’s a different driver suitable for every golfer.

      Cheers

      Reply

      Jay Buckley

      8 years ago

      I recently purchased the M1 – went to Golfsmith and was there for 1+ hours trying different clubs and shafts. Bottom line – the technology works. My spin rate was approx. 3000 but with the M1 adjustment it was brought down to 2200 – 2400 with some shots less. Even notice the shaft choice influenced the spin measurements. With all combined factors I am hitting the longest drives of my life. I played yesterday in NJ and used the M1 for the first time on my home course Fiddlers Elbow. Couldn’t believe the performance ( 250 – 280 yds) – seemed effortless. I must have heard it 4 – 5 times from the guys in the group about how far I was hitting it. Golfsmith has a 30 day playabilty return policy but I will never use it since this club is staying in the bag – Can’t wait for warmer weather.

      Reply

      Harold

      8 years ago

      I have been in golf business for 47 years with a few companies and I think you are dead on perfect.
      Ping is right, but I still feel that the shaft is the most important part of fitting. I still make shafts and I think 8 out of 10 players use to much shaft.

      Reply

      Dennis

      8 years ago

      I seems if you do not have enough knowledge of the variables the fitter can direct you to something that suits them. If they don’t have something to meet your needs.

      Reply

      Brad Smith

      8 years ago

      Maybe the best fitting article I’ve ever read (along with a couple by Tom Wishon). It clearly dispels the major launch condition myth that is heard so often on TV and around the course…”you must lower your driver spin rate to maximize distance”. As Figures 2,3 and 4 show, that is only true for the high ball speed players. For the average speed player with 140 mph ball speed (and that may be higher speed than the average player), for a given launch angle, you get longer carry distance with higher spin, not lower. And the same is even more true for the lowest ball speed player. Excellent article!

      Reply

      Uhit

      8 years ago

      As mentioned as a side mark…
      …the roll can make a big difference.

      Thus, a slightly flatter launch angle and slightly less spin is a better bet (for total distance), than the theoretical optimum for the longest carry distance.

      Also, less spin and a lower trajectory help in windy conditions…

      …and in my opinion, you should get fit with your (gamer) ball and nothing else!

      Imagine the mess, if you get fit with a high spinning ball, and use a low spinning distance ball afterwards… ;-)

      There are always some informations missing…

      Reply

      John

      8 years ago

      The biggest problem I face is having a repeatable swing like most amateur golfers. The swing you have the day you’re fit for new clubs is not the same swing you have a month later. So the clubs you just got fit for are no longer working at the optimum performance. A catch 22 situation for most amateur golfers.

      Reply

      David Westenkirchner

      8 years ago

      I agree with this sentiment exactly. For me this article, written by a manager from Ping, is only more marketing for Ping. Would you expect their numbers to tell any different story than how much improvement one will see?!?

      Adam Beach, I think you have lost sight of your espoused philosophy: “It drives me nuts to think a golfer somewhere is being taken advantage of by marketing or big business.’ IMO, you’ve become a shill for the manufacturers.

      Reply

      John

      8 years ago

      I’m glad at least someone agrees. That being said I do actually love Ping’s new G series. One of the best options for amateur golfers IMHO. Also since I am a lefty I love how virtually every club Ping makes is also available in Left hand option. As it should be. They always get my business.

      Tony Covey

      8 years ago

      I do enjoy a good shill accusation, especially from someone who clearly doesn’t have a grasp on the actual definition. Semantics…

      Yes, Erik from PING produced this article (if we were actually shilling, we would have hidden that).

      Somebody has to write every article, so why not a really smart guy with access to data from literally thousands of fittings?

      Here’s my question: Do you think this data would be any different if it came from TaylorMade, or Callaway, or Titleist? What about Club Champion, True Spec, or Cool Clubs?

      There’s absolutely nothing that in the article that says, or even hints, that this data only applies if you’re buying a PING driver. It’s great info, it applies to any driver fitting, so yeah I’m beyond happy that PING was willing to share it with all of us.

      Incidentally, there’s no financial/ad relationship tied to this article (also a critical element of actual shilling). The same was true with the first PING putter fitting article and the iron fitting article. The same was also true for low compression article Wilson produced for us. I should probably also mention that we’re really excited about what we have in the pipeline with both PING, and Wilson.

      We’ve had discussions with Bridgestone, and I’m literally harassing one of the guys at Callaway on a weekly basis because I think there’s a great match there for a good article too.

      We’ve extended similar offers to basically every company in the golf industry. Why? Because there’s a wealth of incredible information that we think our readers would find interesting.

      So yeah, some guy from a golf company wrote this article. He’s not the first, and he definitely won’t be the last. Call it whatever you want, but that’s how it’s going to be.

      John

      8 years ago

      My intention was to only imply that getting fit for a driver is more difficult than you would think for amateur golfers in general due to their inconsistent swings from one week to the next regardless of the company making the club. The key to a good fitting is to have a somewhat repeatable consistent swing. Without that I think the gains will be minimal.

      Joe Golfer

      8 years ago

      John, Tony Covey’s well written response was not a reply to your comment.
      It was addressed at David Westenkirchner, who accused MGS of being a shill.
      I agree with Tony on this one, not David.
      Sure, Ping did the study, and they do mention their own clubs periodically in the article, but the specifics of the stats apply to any brand of club.

      John

      8 years ago

      Joe Golfer, Yeah I thought that might be the case. I love me some Ping though. One of the best if not the best options for left handed golfers. Thank you Ping!

      Rod_CCCGOLFUSA

      8 years ago

      Rod Clemmons
      Certified Professional Club Fitter
      608 Five Oaks Blvd
      Lebanon, TN 37087

      Reply

      James T

      8 years ago

      My swing changes daily. I cannot be fit for anything. Don’t even think I have “tendencies”. I am still a young man and have already implemented over 3644 swing keys. Some in combination.

      Reply

      Mbwa Kali Sana

      8 years ago

      I went through a complète club fitting ,driver ,irons And putter .I was not convinced.The entire process was to convince me to buy NEW ,expensive golf clubs .So now I do the tinkering on my own.I borrow golf clubs And test them by myself on the golf course ,And never on the Driving range

      Reply

      billm311

      8 years ago

      That is a real shame, and depends on where you were getting “fit”. I have a couple local options in Philadephia, and depending on where you are, the process and philosophy is very different. I would say one place is trackman data driven, but they try to up-sell, and base the fitting on buying new equipment.

      The other place uses generic equipment to match your swing to “families” of shafts that work, then give you options. I opted to use my old club heads, reshafted with heavier weights but lighter flex shafts. The end result has been phenomenal.

      Reply

      GREG

      8 years ago

      The problem with getting a proper fitting is finding someone who knows how and has enough equipment (shafts, heads) on hand.

      Reply

      The Club Nut

      8 years ago

      I may have missed it, but is this taking into factor that the player is fit for the SAME driver as his or her gamer but with the “proper” specs, and then comparing the two? or is the player fit for a different driver than they currently have.

      Reply

      Erik Henrikson

      8 years ago

      The data presented is comparing a player’s gamer to the fitted driver allowing all variables to change (including the model). There could be a few fittings in the data where a player may have stuck with the same model and only changed the loft setting, shaft, etc.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.