Shaft Review – Fujikura PRO 2.0
News

Shaft Review – Fujikura PRO 2.0

Shaft Review – Fujikura PRO 2.0

shaft-trust-stripe-3

For the better part of the last year and a half or so, the Fujikura story has been primarily ATMOS driven. With 3…now 4 distinct TOUR SPEC models, ATMOS routinely accounts for more than 30 of the driver shafts in play each week on PGA Tour. That’s impressive given that trends – even on tour – favor the latest and presumably greatest.

With ATMOS maintaining and even gaining steam, Fujikura has recently released PRO 2.0, which as its name should make plenty obvious, is the second generation of Fujikura’s PRO series.

The original PRO, in one form or another, found its way into OEM lineups, got plenty of play on tour and sold well in the aftermarket. PRO was and remains a good design, but armed with insights gleaned from its proprietary ENSO system, Fujikura felt it could build on the PRO platform and make it even better.

Fuji-sitewide-20

“Easy Loading”

While we’re accustomed to shaft manufacturers speaking in terms of launch and spin, the primary performance characteristic of PRO is increased shaft load. Using ENSO, Fujikura has determined that about 3.5 inches of load at the point of maximum deflection (generally in transition) is ideal. Most amateurs, especially those with swing speeds in the 70-MPH range, produce only about 1.6-2.2 inches of deflection.

To help get your 1.6 closer to 3.5, PRO and now PRO 2.0 is designed with a softer, easier loading handle to help golfers create and store more energy and produce greater clubhead speed.

Described in general terms, PRO 2.0 has a soft handle with stiff middle and tip sections. 2.0. It uses the same materials as the original but for 2.0 the company has softened and extended the loading zone. Mid and Tip sections are described as stiff and the torque has been lowered to produce greater stability.

The TOUR SPEC version is appreciably stiffer to flex (see below), and while still described as a soft handle offering, it’s more suitable to harder, more aggressive swingers.

FUJIPro2-10

While both PRO and PRO 2.0 are classified as LOW/MID offerings within the Cool Clubs S3 system, according to Fujikura, the 2.0 can be expected to produce a bit less spin than the original with the TOUR SPEC offering even lower spin.

A secondary selling point for PRO 2.0 that not get much attention is that its swing weight is a little lighter. We’re not necessarily talking about counter-balancing, but the distribution of weight gives fitters and DIYers more flexibility to move weight around the head without much risk of the club feeling heavy.

Fujikura describes the PRO 2.0 shaft as offering effortless power, and what that really means is golfers don’t have to work as hard to load the shaft. While that can mean more speed (head and ball), there’s also an element of fatigue reduction in play. When you’re getting into holes, 16, 17, 18, and starting to feel a little tired, easy loading means you’re less likely to find yourself fighting the shaft in the home stretch.

FUJIKURA PRO 2.0: The Cool Clubs S3 Comparison

s3full

“S3 Technologies utilizes the most advanced shaft testing technology in the industry. The Shaft Simulation System (S3), which was developed in 2013, is a fully-automated, all-in-one shaft profiling machine. In a matter of minutes, the S3 determines the following shaft specs: (Straightness, Consistency Profile, EI Profile, CPM Analysis and Torque. While some of the aforementioned specs can be obtained from shaft manufacturers, a lack of industry standards prevents that data from being used for accurate apples-to-apples comparisons. S3 Technologies, solves this challenge by testing all of our production in-house using the S3. This gives S3 Technologies a unique and in-depth understanding of the quality and performance of the industry’s shafts.”

Not only does S3 give us standardized quantitative information about the shaft(s) being reviewed, the data we share will provide you with a much better sense of how those shafts compare with similarly spec’d offerings on the market today.

We’ve included comparisons of both the PRO 2.0 and PRO 2.0 Tour Spec in our charts, as well as S3 data for the original Fujikura PRO Shafts.

FUJIKURA PRO 2.0 Launch Characteristics

FUJIKURA Pro 2.0 Launch

In the 60-gram range, both the PRO 2.0 and the PRO 2.0 shafts are classified as LOW/MID launch within the Cool Clubs S3 Database. S3 measurements suggest that both models should launch slightly higher than the previous model.

FUJIKURA PRO 2.0 ZONE EI

The following chart compares the stiffness of the PRO 2.0 to the original in the butt, mid, and tip sections. Measurements are based on the stiff flex versions in the 60-70g range.

FUJIKURA Pro 2.0 EI

Because each shaft manufacturer defines zones a bit differently, it’s not unusual for S3 measurements to deviate from OEM descriptions. In this case, we see the softer handle section described by Fujikura, however, the mid and tip zones (as defined in S3) of the 2.0 are also slightly softer than the original. The frequency measurements (not shown), suggest that, at equivalent weight and flex, the previous version is approximately 1/2 flex stiffer than the 2.0.

FUJIKURA PRO 2.0 BALANCE POINT

The following chart compares the balance point of the PRO 2.0 to the original. Measurements are based on the stiff flex versions in the 60-70g range.

FUJIKURA Pro 2.0 Balance

The S3 data suggests that the balance point in the standard model has been raised slightly, while the change is much more pronounced in the Tour Spec model.

As you may recall from our Golf Geeks Story on Shaft Performance, a higher balance point allows for more head weight without drastically impacting the swingweight. For golfers seeking more distance (admittedly often at the expense of accuracy), this allows drivers to be built to longer playing lengths.

FUJIKURA PRO 2.0 Swing Speed Recommendations

The chart below provides swing speed recommendations for the entire PRO 2.0 and PRO 2.0 Tour Spec lineup.

FUJIKURA Pro 2.0 Speed

As we noted previously, the new models are approximately 1/2 flex stiffer than the previous model. Also note that the Tour Spec model is nearly half a flex stiffer than the standard model. This is reflected in the recommendation chart where, for example, the PRO 2.0 TS 6 (stiff) can be expected to fit someone who swings from just over 100 MPH to just under 120 MPH, while the standard model in stiff flex is better suited for someone who swings just over 90 to just under 110 MPH.

These recommendations are based on the full range of Cool Clubs‘ building and fitting capabilities, including factors such as tipping and build length which can cause a shaft to play either softer or stiffer.

To simplify things a bit, you may wish to narrow these ranges. The sweet spot from a fitting perspective begins 25% from the slow end of the range. As a general rule, players with faster tempos, particularly in transition may fit into a stiffer flex, while smoother swingers often fit into a softer flex.

Advice from the Cool Clubs Fitting Team

The design of Fujikura’s new Pro 2.0 transfers energy very smoothly and efficiently in the loading zone creating the potential for more clubhead speed at impact. At the same time, they have increased the torsional stiffness slightly for a more controlled shot, tighter dispersion, and lower spin rate.

The Pro Series 2.0 shaft is offered in 3 different weight classes: 50, 60, and 70, along with 60, 70, and 80 for the Pro 2.0 Tour Spec. Flexes range from R2 to X in the Pro 2.0 and S and X in the Tour Spec. We will focus on the 60 gram S flex models.

For players with swing speeds between 95 and 105 mph with a moderate tempo, the Pro 2.0 6S shaft will work well. Players with swing speeds between 105 and 115 with a more aggressive tempo the Pro 2.0 Tour Spec 6S will work well.

Relative to similar shafts on the market in the neutral to mid launching category, the Pro Series 2.0 will launch marginally higher. Relative to the original Pro Series shafts, the butt section is slightly softer (feel), the midsection is slightly stiffer with a very similar tip section. Overall, this results in a slightly higher launch angle, more boring ball flight, and very consistent shots.

Ideal for golfers of all skill levels, the lower loading section can help return that club head to a square position at impact.

Information is based on test results of the 6S flex Pro 2.0 and Pro 2.0 TS shafts from Cool Club’s S3 Shaft Explorer with over 3200+ shaft profiles for comparison.

FUJIPro2-9

Similar Shafts – Pro 2.0 (6-S)

Mitsubishi Tensei CK Orange 70-R
  • A little heavier and a little softer, Mid launch (vs Mid/Low)
UST VTS Silver 6-S
  • A little lighter, ~1/2 flex stiffer, stiffer butt section
  • Same launch profile & mid and tip region EI

Similar Shafts: Fuji Pro Tour Spec 2.0 6-S

Aldila NV 65-S
  • Slightly higher launch (Mid/Low to Mid)
Graphite Design MAD 65 PRO-S
  • Similar in most regards, except for a softer butt section

FUJIPro2-11

Pricing

MSRP for the Fujikura PRO 2.0 is $225. The Fujikura PRO 2.0 Tour Spec has an MSRP of $250. For more information visit FujikuraGolf.com.

WHAT’S NEXT?

As we mentioned in an earlier post, this is a new way for us to review golf shafts. Please continue to let us know what you like, what you don’t like, and what suggestions you have (we’ve already implemented some of them) for future S3-Powered reviews.

Also, if there’s a specific shaft you’d like to see us review next, please let us know.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Gary Durand

      4 years ago

      Goor overview on Fuji pro shafts helped very much on decision

      Reply

      Martin

      5 years ago

      Little late on commenting, but I have had great success with Fijukura Shaft currently have PRO XLR and have the PRO2.0 Tour in another club. They feel great and preform will with my swing.

      Reply

      brad

      5 years ago

      What would the low launching pro 63 swing speed be?

      Reply

      Jon

      6 years ago

      Hi Tony,
      Fantastic write up and super in-depth!

      I was recently fitted for the PRO 2.0 – 6S and the fitter was going to charge me $300. I’m assuming it includes trimming, pureing, etc. and not just for the shaft itself. I noticed that you provided similar shafts, and that is awesome nobody does this from what’ve I read and I’ve been looking everywhere for similar shafts.

      So, I can’t seem to find the UST VTS Silver 6 anywhere for sale and I don’t want to play the heavier Tensei shaft. I was able to find the Aldida NV but that’s for the Tour Spec Shaft, would I still be able to play this Aldida Shaft even though i was fitted for the non tour spec?

      Thanks!

      Reply

      Steve S

      6 years ago

      A couple of graphs didn’t have the axis labeled with description and units. Other than that a great presentation. I know it’s a lot of work; thanks for the effort.

      Reply

      Steve

      6 years ago

      Great article with data. So much better than any other method of shaft reviews I have seen. Would you expect improvement for a current Pro 63 6 S user?

      Reply

      mackdaddy

      6 years ago

      Love my Matrix shaft I have had since 2009

      Reply

      dcorun

      6 years ago

      I’ve been playing the original Pro 50 series in R flex for about a year in my M2. I was fitted for it compared to several other shafts. Am I going to see enough change or improvement to justify the $225 upgrade to the 2.0?

      Reply

      Tony

      6 years ago

      Hi folks besides the Fujikura Pro XLR 8 driver shaft R flex which is suting me well thanks to Mygolfspy, please suggest iron shafts in graphite 75 to 95 gram range which are easy to load for 60 year smooth tempo.
      Will the Ping Alta CB irons shaft be good? Many thanks.

      Reply

      Nocklaus

      6 years ago

      Missing specs for torque.

      Reply

      John Muir

      6 years ago

      Excellent new review template. I really like the “similar shaft” section. Also like the mix of technical info/charts and also casual observations (i.e. “1/2 flex stiffer”). The swingspeed chart is cool and very helpful, though I wonder if many 70-75 mph swingspeed golfers with the 2.0 R2 might struggle with that shaft profile and flex. “Your narrow these ranges” comment is spot on. Great job.
      John

      Reply

      Gary Gutful

      6 years ago

      Great write-up. Awesome to see all of the S3 data and the comparisons with other shafts based on actual test results. Welcome change from other reviewers who tell you nothing and then respond to every question in the comment section with “Go and get fitted”.

      Reply

      Txgolfjunkie

      6 years ago

      So what I enjoyed at my latest fitting when the fitter was describing shaft bend profiles is which PGA Tour pro best fit the shaft’s profile. Let’s say a Sergio-type swing, someone who really loads the shaft with a lot of lag needs a stiff butt, stiff mid and stiff tip. A Rory-type swing, needs a softer mid because he doesn’t load the shaft as much as Sergio. An Adam Scott-type swing needs a softer tip because he doesn’t really load the shaft all that hard to begin with. I know JB Holmes likes/liked the Fuji Pro for awhile…not sure if he still does, but his swing profile is probably the best fit for that shaft. Not necessarily swing speeds, etc but swing types could be a good metric for shaft reviews.

      Reply

      Neil Cameron

      6 years ago

      like the bit about the sweet spot for swing speed.

      Reply

      Max

      6 years ago

      I’m still rocking the Fujikura Fuel 70 S in my driver based on your write up of it a few years back. Any idea where the Fuel might fall into the above chart?

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      6 years ago

      At 60-s weight/flex, the fuel is significantly stiffer overall (~11 CPM). It’s significantly stiffer in the butt and tip sections, and moderately stiffer in the mid section. The Pro 2.0 has a relatively flat EI curve, while the FUEL has a bit more bend because of its soft mid section.

      Reply

      Steve

      6 years ago

      Thanks for the review, Tony — good info. While your younger readers won’t be as concerned, those of us in the baby boomer demographic who are making or considering the change from steel to graphite in irons (and wedges) will be interested in your reviews of shafts for irons. Drivers understandably get a lot of pub, but I think there is a growing market for good value, high quality graphite shafts for irons, especially for more moderate swing speeds — but without relying solely on lightweight OEM shafts that are a drastic switch from 105-120 gram steel shafts. Thanks.

      Reply

      Richie3Jack

      6 years ago

      Fujikura has a Pro iron shaft that weighs in at 115 grams. It is a superb shaft.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.