Shaft Review – Graphite Design TOUR AD IZ
Golf Accessories

Shaft Review – Graphite Design TOUR AD IZ

Shaft Review – Graphite Design TOUR AD IZ

We’ve talked before about Graphite Design’s habit of expanding its popular Tour AD shaft lineup each season. Like most in the shaft biz, Graphite Design habitually leverages new materials and new technologies to tweak its profiles and ultimately create more options for golfers.

What’s perhaps interesting about Graphite Design is that it rarely iterates to the degree that requires it to tombstone a perfectly good (and popular) product. That’s the case with its recently released Tour AD IZ. While in many respects the IZ can be thought of as an update to the more than a decade-old Tour AD DI, it’s not a direct replacement. The original orange shaft in the Tour AD lineup isn’t going anywhere.

Graphite Design Tour AD IZ-104

The AD DI is often used by golfers and even some Graphite Design competitors, as a baseline for describing relative shaft performance, and that’s certainly appropriate here. According to Graphite Design, the Tour AD IZ falls somewhere between the higher launching DI and the lower launching Tour AD TP, though its profile and performance are more similar to the former.

If you’re looking for a general frame of reference, compared with the AD, Graphite Design says the IZ is ever so slightly stiffer in the tip and mid sections and bit softer in the butt section.

These are subtle, but appreciable differences, which is exactly what we’d expect from the AD lineup.

GD-wood-shaft-comparison-chart

For those concerned with materials, the Tour AD IZ blends 50t premium graphite along with sections (most notably in the tip) of strategically placed TORAYCA T1100G to provide a stable shaft that the company says offers great feel.

With actual weights range from 46g (IZ 4) to 83g (IZ 8) and several flexes available at each of those weights, Graphite Design has run the count of individual Tour IZ shafts up to 14. Of particular note are the 40g version (available in lite, regular and stiff), and the 50g, which marks the first time a Tour AD shaft is available in a 50 X.

gd

TOUR AD IZ Data Powered by Cool Clubs S3

We’ve partnered with Cool Clubs, the Golf Industry’s Leading Custom Fit Club Company, to bring you shaft reviews powered by its Shaft Simulation System (S3).

s3full

S3 TECHNOLOGIES UTILIZES THE MOST ADVANCED SHAFT TESTING TECHNOLOGY IN THE INDUSTRY. THE SHAFT SIMULATION SYSTEM (S3), WHICH WAS DEVELOPED IN 2013, IS A FULLY-AUTOMATED, ALL-IN-ONE SHAFT PROFILING MACHINE. IN A MATTER OF MINUTES, THE S3 DETERMINES THE FOLLOWING SHAFT SPECS: (STRAIGHTNESS, CONSISTENCY PROFILE, EI PROFILE, CPM ANALYSIS, AND TORQUE). WHILE SOME OF THE AFOREMENTIONED SPECS CAN BE OBTAINED FROM SHAFT MANUFACTURERS, A LACK OF INDUSTRY STANDARDS PREVENTS THAT DATA BEING USED FOR ACCURATE APPLES-TO-APPLES COMPARISONS. S3 TECHNOLOGIES SOLVES THIS CHALLENGE BY TESTING ALL OF OUR PRODUCTS IN-HOUSE USING THE S3. THIS GIVES S3 TECHNOLOGIES A UNIQUE AND IN-DEPTH UNDERSTANDING OF THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE INDUSTRY’S SHAFTS.

Not only does S3 give us standardized quantitative information about the shaft(s) being reviewed, the data we share will provide you with a much better sense of how those shafts compare with similarly spec’d offerings on the market.

Graphite Design Tour AD IZ-102

Tour AD IZ Launch Characteristics

The dark gray line represents the S3 database average for stiff flex shafts in the 60-70g weight range. The light gray line represents a neutral profile, is effectively the baseline for a mid-launch profile.

Based on S3 measurements the Tour AD IZ is classified as a Mid-High launch shaft.

Zone EI

The following chart compares the stiffness of the Graphite Design Tour AD IZ in the butt, mid, and tip sections to the S3 database average of stiff flex shafts in the 60-70g range.

Balance Point

The following chart compares the balance point of the Graphite Design Tour AD IZ to the S3 database average of stiff flex shafts in the 60-70g range.

The Tour AD IZ has a higher than average balance point. As you may recall from our Golf Geeks Story on Shaft Performance, a higher balance point allows for more head weight without drastically impacting the swingweight. For golfers seeking more distance (admittedly often at the expense of accuracy), this allows drivers to be built to longer playing lengths.

Swing Speed Recommendations

The chart below provides swing speed recommendations for the entire Tour AD IZ lineup.

Note that these recommendations are based on the full range of Cool Clubs‘ building and fitting capabilities, including factors such as tipping and build length which can cause a shaft to play either softer or stiffer.

To simplify things a bit, you may wish to narrow these ranges. The sweet spot from a fitting perspective begins 25% from the slow end of the range. As a general rule, players with faster tempos, particularly in transition may fit into a stiff flex, while smoother swingers often fit into a softer flex.

Advice From the Cool Clubs Fitting Team

The new Tour AD IZ Wood shaft is offered in 5 different weight classes (40, 50, 60, 70, and 80), a variety of flexes (from light to X-Stiff), and two bend profiles. These characteristics are designed to help find the right fit for a player based on speed, tempo, and what kind of ball flight they need help producing.

The Tour AD IZ wood shaft will help produce higher launch angles than normal and lower spin (for 4 of the 5 weight classes: IZ-5, -6, -7, and -8). With the shaft having a firmer grip section, a slightly softer mid section, and back to a moderate tip section, this helps load the shaft for efficient energy transfer and higher shots, all while controlling the flight with lower spin rates. The torques on the IZ-6, -7, and -8 are slightly lower than the average of most driver shafts on the market which enhances the stability for those who swing the club a little faster. For players with swing speeds between 95 and 115 mph and a moderate to slightly quicker tempo the IZ-6 shaft will work well. However, if the player has an early release they might want a shaft with a slightly stiffer butt to tip ratio.

Graphite Design Tour AD IZ-105

For players who swing about 90 to 105 mph and average tempo, the IZ-5 is a great shaft to enhance launch if the player needs to hit the ball higher. Relative to other shafts on the market in the same category and swinging at the same speed the IZ-5 will launch the ball higher without excessively increasing the spin.

The lighter weight Tour AD IZ-4 has a slightly different bend profile than the heavier IZ shafts.  Lighter shafts are typically composed of less material which dictates a different profile, and consequently, they will perform differently than their heavier counterparts. While still stable these lighter weight shafts cannot bring spin and launch down like a heavier shaft. The IZ-4 is softer in both the butt and tip sections producing slightly more spin. It launches the ball higher than other shafts in its category and combined with the spin the ball stays in the air longer which works well for those swing speeds requiring a lighter weight shaft as in the 82 to 90 mph range with an easy tempo.

If you need help with height on your driver or fairway woods but don’t want to sacrifice shaft stability, ball control, and feel go test the new Tour AD IZ shaft and get “Into The Zone”!

Information is based on test results of the S flex IZ shafts from Cool Club’s S3 Shaft Explorer with over 2500+ shaft profiles for comparison.

What’s Next?

As we mentioned in an earlier post, this is a completely new way for us to review golf shafts. Let us know what you like, what you don’t like, and what suggestions you have for future S3-Powered reviews.

Also, if there’s a shaft you’d like to see us review next, please let us know.

For You

For You

Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
Buyer's Guides
Apr 12, 2024
Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
First Look
Apr 12, 2024
Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
News
Apr 12, 2024
PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      John Kendall

      6 years ago

      Congratulations!

      Webb Simpson just won The Players Championship using a Graphite Design Tour AD IZ 5 X in his driver.
      He led the field in driving accuracy, hitting more than 84% of fairways

      Reply

      Gary Gutful

      6 years ago

      The article states:

      “If you’re looking for a general frame of reference, compared with the AD, Graphite Design says the IZ is ever so slightly stiffer in the tip and mid sections and bit softer in the butt section.”

      Yet the shaft comparison chart seems to suggest that the DI (Stiff) is stiffer in the tip than the IZ (Firm+).

      Confused…

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      6 years ago

      I expect we’re going to see more of this type of contradiction as we do this. It’s basically the difference between how Graphtie Design measures and how S3 measures.

      Shaft manufacturers measure shafts different, define regions (butt, mid, tip) differently, and of course, differently from one another. Basically, there’s no industry-wide standard.

      S3 gives us common denominator from which to make an apples-to-apples comparison, which may not always align with a given OEMs methods.

      Reply

      JGH

      6 years ago

      Great article. Have used the same GD -DI6s shaft through three different Titleist D3 heads. I keep putting the shaft into each new driver head I purchase. Have not found any other shaft to work as well (although I have evaluated some of the latest offerings). Loved the article’s info that helped to point out the subtle differences in GD’s offerings.

      Reply

      Bob

      6 years ago

      What I would be interested in seeing is a comparison between club manufacturers versions of shafts and the real thing. Example the project X HRZDUS shaft was in a lot of drivers this year with no upgrade fee, the club manufacturers are not going to give you a $400 shaft in a $400 driver. So I’d like to see the diffrence in shafts. Also I game a graphite designe tour ad BB, I’d like to see test on that also

      Reply

      abraham

      6 years ago

      really guys there will never be a standard for shafts it’s what keeps the golf industry going. Read all the data you want it’s not going to be worth spending $300. for a shaft to gain 3 yards, really? it’s all smoke but makes for interesting reading and adds to the chase for the holy grail.
      dont forget thats why you carry additional clubs to make up for those 3 yards you might lose with the old clubs. look at your game and see where you really left strokes. Kudos to my golf spy they are doing a great job.

      Reply

      Jon D

      6 years ago

      Good article. But what I like even better are the comments. I have been fitted for my clubs but I always walk away scratching my head wondering whether or not I’ve really got the optimal club/shaft combination. Particularly the shafts.

      My swing seems to vary from outing to outing at least a little. Some days I stripe it, some days I hook it, other days push it, some days my swing speed is a little faster or slower than other days.

      So on a different day would the same fitter put me into the same combination? On the same day with the same data would a different fitter put me into something altogether different?

      Then I see on of the comments about a guy who has had 5 fittings in 3 years. Really!! I have to draw the conclusion that the first four in a least some way were deficient, at least for him.

      So a guy like me who gets fitted every four or five years for a new Driver or longer for a new set of irons is really just shooting in the dark. A fitting is better than no fitting no doubt but the whole deal about club/shaft combinations has to be so fluid that it is discouraging.

      Another comment about the lack of standards between manufacturers. I definitely agree with ToppaKrat. But goes even further.

      Are the stats for different shaft lines of a single manufacturer rated the same from one line to the next one year to the next? Probably not all the time. So if a single manufacturer can’t get it consistent with in its own product lines, its no wonder that there is such a big difference in standard of measurement throughout the industry.

      I’ve had the frequency on my irons checked a few years back just for fun. There were small differences from club to club, but my 7 iron was a bit of an outlier. The shafts were marketed as stiff. The club fitter pronounced them regular.

      Go figure!!!

      Reply

      TopPakRat

      6 years ago

      Agree with Jon B. 100%

      I want to state regarding my prior comment I applaud My Golf Spy and Cool Clubs for conducting this test. I might also add that the Tour Ad shafts are a real credit to the industry. No question a premium well designed product.

      I think we just need to come up with an industry standard for all specs and methods of measurements especially if your considering a $300.00 purchase of a golf shaft. The golf consumer today is confused enough which hurts the entire golf industry including the shaft manufacturers.

      Reply

      TopPakRat

      6 years ago

      Lets clear the air on issues regarding shafts.

      The entire shaft industry has no standard of measurement.

      That makes all shaft measurements with the exception of length B.S.

      Just two of many examples:
      First, their is NO INDUSTRY STANDARD in measuring TORQUE
      Torque is measured by one manufacturer I inch from the tip and another company measures at 1!/2 inches from the tip

      Second there is no industry standard for FLEX
      Flex is a term and is only relevant to that manufacturer. The flex in one company’s shaft could be called a regular and another company a firm

      If My Golf Spy wants a real challenge why not come up with a universal program for measurements in shafts!

      Reply

      Brad Smith

      6 years ago

      Regarding the first graph in the article “launch parameters”. What is it showing. No labels on axes. Is it numeric data that is plotted and just not labeled, or is it just a visual symbolic representation of launch angle. If it is just symbolic, eliminate the graph and just describe it. Using a graphical representation (rather than a numerically plotted graph) in an article purporting to be based on high tech measurements seems counterproductive.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      6 years ago

      I’m sure we can add the numbers, but it’s a relative S3 measurement that doesn’t directly align with how golfers typically think about launch. The Mid/Default value shown is always 0. As you move above or farther from 0, classifications change from mid, to mid/high or low, to high or low depending on how far they are from 0.

      Again, everything here is essentially relative, so I’m not sure how stating that the Tour IZ has an S3 Launch value of .52 is particularly meaningful to a reader. That said, in this case, we compared a single shaft to the average and the default. In future reviews, we’ll display other comparisons, which should make the graphics more meaningful.

      Reply

      Alan

      6 years ago

      Excellent article, great writing, wonderful new GD product.
      I do not wish to be a sore thumb but shafts have just a marginal to minimal impact on ones RESULTS.

      If you are a high speed swinger , 110+ mph, the shaft is going to give you at best 7 more total yards. If you for example have a negative attack angle with excessive spin, the “lowest spinning” shaft will only knock off a few hundred rpm.

      If you have a serious swing flaw , well then you are just wasting your money !! I realize golf is played with 50% of the swing/mechanics between your ears, so if you like a product and feel a premium product will help you , it becomes a self-realizing prophecy.

      There are certainly quality and material differences in shafts. I play a Diamana Limited S+ in driver and love the smooth feel. I recently purchased a HZRDUS T800 and have been experimenting with it.

      BUT, at my mediocre 90 mph, PERFORMANCE WIZE ON THE COURSE where it counts, the 5 yard or so plus or minus are really not going to change ones handicap !!!!!

      Reply

      Hung

      4 years ago

      Not the distance but the right shaft give you the feel and confident to swing your best shot.

      Reply

      DaveMac

      6 years ago

      Tony, you asked for feedback on this ‘new’ type of shaft review so here is a point to consider.

      You are using the S3 profiling data to establish a measurement based assessment of the shaft’s potential performance, this is all well and good but when you get to the advice on potential player matching the language drops back to the use of terms like tempo and release completely lacking any measurable reference.

      Since the bulk of golfers now have access to high frame rate video there is the possibility of adding equally meaningful and measurable data to describe a golfer’s swing. It is even possible to take the precession up a level using the swing timing data from swing analysers such as Sky Pro.

      So what in numerical terms (milliseconds) constitutes a fast / slow tempo? What constitutes an early / late release (downswing milliseconds)? What about the time taken to fully release the club (release rate)?

      Benchmarking the swing makes the same sense as benchmarking the shaft.

      Keep up the good work, but this is a very complex subject.

      P.S. Watch out that these articles don’t start to read like an advertising vehicle for Cool Clubs.

      Reply

      ChrisK

      6 years ago

      Now i like these thoughts that Davemac is saying — that would be REALLY cool to get time measurements at different points in the swing. I’d bet that would be some really fascinating info, that could actually be compared to every golfer.

      Reply

      Golfinnut

      6 years ago

      Love the sound of the IZ5. You could send one my way for complete testing & review! I even have a tip waiting for it :)

      Reply

      Tom Duckworth

      6 years ago

      I love the testing system and I’m looking forward to what comes from this partnership. However the swing speed speed chart was almost unreadable for me the thin lines and some of the colors were pretty close to one another. It just made it very hard to tell what line went with what shaft. Maybe it’s my age or maybe it’s my screen but some letters by each line would have helped.
      This is really the light that needs to be shined on shaft design if the OEMs won’t come up with standards it great to have some kind of baseline info from someone. This is one of your best partnerships.

      Reply

      Jmarkus

      6 years ago

      totally agree w Tom.

      Reply

      Jon Silverberg

      6 years ago

      Not only do I agree with Tom, I’ll go further: Many men have some degree of red-green color blindness and, all too often, information displays present data in a way which ignores that fact. Please add numbers or letters to link the lines in the graph to the lines on the legend. Thank you.

      Reply

      Fitted 5-Times

      6 years ago

      Great information in this review. I’ve never come across this type of information for Fairway specific shafts. All one hears is the standard (and in my opinion grossly wrong) recommendations of FW shafts being same as driver shaft but 10 gm heavier etc. FW is usually the toughest club to fit, at least it has been for me during 5 fittings over 3 years.

      Since Cool Clubs is a big proponent of Accra and developed the S3 alongside Accra, I’d like to see reviews of Accra’s FW specific shafts plus a few others in the market.
      1. Accra FX200-F and Accra FX300-F fairway shafts
      2. Graphite Design AD-F series fairway shaft
      3. Mitsubishi Diamana Thump fairway shaft
      4. Paderson KINETIXX KG Fairway shafts (3-4 different fairway specific shafts)

      Reply

      Joe Golfer

      6 years ago

      I like the chart for swing speed recommendations.
      Wish there was more info on what type of golfer would want a shaft with a firm or soft mid shaft, or a firm or softer butt stiffness.
      A golfer with a slower swing speed but a very rapid tempo might need a stiffer shaft than one who swings faster but with a slower, smoother tempo.
      I do like that Graphite Design has a shaft between Stiff and Regular.
      I often find myself in that category, and neither shaft works well as far as the stock shafts off the rack.
      I wonder how many shafts they test of each model. High end shafts like these have good consistency. Cheap shafts, like many stock shafts, can have great deviation between even the same flex shafts of same model. I recall a test of some TaylorMade stock shafts a few years back, and the same flex and model shafts had frequency differences of 15-20 cpms, which is two full flexes despite the letter written on the shaft giving one the impression they were all the same.

      Reply

      John Muir

      6 years ago

      Love the new review format, well done!
      John

      Reply

      Alex

      6 years ago

      Congrats on the article, very well written. Question here in Spain,

      If I hit with a 7 seven iron at 91-94 mph with it 165 yards to 188 carry (, I m using now a diamana S-plus 50 stiff on my epic driver) is it some risk to order one of this without been able to prove it.

      I do not have the swing speed with my driver. Can you extrapolate, to the driver speed. m 6,3 or 184 m2 and weight 110 kilos, hit about 250 meters max with driver…when well hit. is it worth transtioning to ad IZ 5s or 6S.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
    Buyer's Guides
    Apr 12, 2024
    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
    First Look
    Apr 12, 2024
    Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
    News
    Apr 12, 2024
    PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.