Shot Scope Case Study #1: Scott the Poor Putter
Labs

Shot Scope Case Study #1: Scott the Poor Putter

Shot Scope Case Study #1: Scott the Poor Putter

Last month, we used Shot Scope data to examine the Previous Shot Effect and the Anatomy of a 3-Putt across a range of ability levels. Today, the guys at Shot Scope are narrowing focusing and offering a case study of a single golfer. It’s an example of how, by analyzing Shot Scope data, one can identify not only areas in which to focus practices opportunities but also weaknesses in things like course management and even the equipment in your bag.

In this first study, the team at Shot Scope provides an analysis of one of its employees and in doing so, uncovers something unexpected.

If you’re a current Shot Scope user, be sure to check out the last paragraph for an opportunity to take part in a case study of your game.

Scott’s Story

Scott, the Sales Director at Shot Scope, is a former professional golfer who now has a handicap of 0. He plays club matches and some club tournaments. Scott is constantly in the office complaining about his Putts per Round total and how much he practices that area of the game. Eventually, the Shot Scope team took pity on him and decided to have a look at his performance data to hopefully make some suggestions which would result in lower scores.

Here is what we found!

DataArticle_MyGolfSpy_June18_Scott1

As you can see in his game overview, Scott is a skilled golfer who hits the ball well off the tee, finds fairways a healthy percentage of the time. His green success (Greens in Regulation) is on the low side, and his avg proximity for approaches is farther from the hole than we’d expect from a scratch golfer. Scott routinely alludes to the fact that his putting statistics aren’t great. 34.2 putts per round is poor, and an average of one 3-putt once per round is also poor for a player at Scott’s level.

Let’s start with a look at Scott’s putting:

DataArticle_MyGolfSpy_June18_Scott4

As you can see his Make % for short (less than 6-feet), medium (6-18 feet) and long (greater than 18-feet) putts are slightly low, but they are not terrible. Ideally, Scott should be touching 90% for short range, 28% for medium range and anything in double figures for longs putts. Those ideal Make % stats are based on data gathered from 0 – 1 handicap golfers on the Shot Scope system.

DataArticle_MyGolfSpy_June18_Scott2

His breakdown of Putts per Green highlights an issue; there are not enough 1- putts taking place. Understanding his Make % ratios, it would seem that he is not giving himself enough opportunities to make 1-putts regularly. His 3- putt % is also high. We know he 3-putts too many greens and this will either be due to inconsistent strike, poor green reading, or that his first putt distance is too far from the hole. With a scratch golfer it is unlikely that it is inconsistent strike and green reading so let’s have a look at Scott’s proximity to hole statistics.

Looking at Scott’s short game, he uses a mix of clubs (8-iron to putter) to pitch/chip. The simple solution is to improve his general sharpness and try to bring his avg proximity to under 10 feet. He might be capable of doing this by simply switching some of his putting practice to short game practice, but we don’t feel that his short game is the complete cause of his long initial putting distance.

DataArticle_MyGolfSpy_June18_Scott3

Scott’s proximity to the hole from 75–125 yards could definitely be tightened up. 46.1 feet is below standard for a scratch handicap golfer, considering the best on the PGA Tour is 14.2 feet. His approach play from 125–225 yards also leaves a lot to be desired, with an avg proximity to the hole of 67.8 feet. Effectively Scott is managing to hit greens, but the putts he leaves are a long way from the hole.

To give Scott actionable insights, we looked into his wedge play, thinking that he could concentrate on making some changes over his next five rounds and we could measure improvement. Looking at his green success by club, however, we noticed an issue. There is a problem with his 9-iron. It is evident that this club is not performing at nearly the correct level, Scott is going to have it checked out by a club fitter to check the shaft, loft, and lie.

DataArticle_MyGolfSpy_June18_Scott6

DataArticle_MyGolfSpy_June18_Scott5

Checking the average distances for his short irons, we see that he also has a gapping issue. Scott is going to organize a testing session to check his clubs and improve his gapping.

OUTCOME

Out of sync 9-iron green success and non-existent gapping with short irons are the likely root causes of Scott’s issues. The recommendation is to visit club-fitter for a check-up. Aim to improve proximity to hole between 75–125 yards initially and then improve 125– 225-yard proximity to hole.

Get Your Shot Scope Game Evaluation

Would you like to take part in a Shot Scope Case Study? If you are a Shot Scope user with over 15 rounds in your account, enter your details below – including handicap, location, and the area of the game you think requires work. Shot Scope will select different users and compile reports.

For You

For You

Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
Buyer's Guides
Apr 12, 2024
Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
First Look
Apr 12, 2024
Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
News
Apr 12, 2024
PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Our mission is #ConsumerFirst. We are here to help educate and empower golfers. We want you to get the most out of your money, time and performance. That means providing you with equipment reviews you can trust, as well as honest reporting on the latest issues affecting the game today. #PowerToThePlayer

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Driver Ping G30 Hybrids PXG 0317
3/4 IRON PXG 0311XF 5-GW Srixon Z 565
SW PXG 0317 LW PXG 0311
Putter EVNROLL  
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      David Aurand

      6 years ago

      11 handicap
      Stuck in the 80’s loop
      Club selection, due to lie of ball on hilly courses and ball contact.
      Mid and short game (first putt to long as result)
      Pennsylvania USA

      Reply

      David Aurand

      6 years ago

      For me great insight, love my V2….
      Three sets of clubs, different gaping. Still under testing. But game, pleasure of usage and stats really starting to hone in on key areas to improve. Great opportunity to see what experts think. It is not only the watch. These people care and are great in all areas, the true reward. People who support and stand behind there products after the sale.

      Reply

      Brian Thomson

      6 years ago

      Handicap 10
      Golf course Newburgh on ythan
      Approach and putting
      Been using shotscope for a while but would welcome greater insight into how to make better use of the data eg Having read comments above need to make use of positional shots

      Reply

      Michael Herrera

      6 years ago

      Michael Herrera
      Austin,Texas
      15 handicap
      Approach shots to the pin and chipping to the pin

      Reply

      Jerry Noble

      6 years ago

      No way this guy can be a scratch golfer. Every scratch golfer I know drives it straight, hits a lot of greens and is a very good putter. He might be a 5 or 6 if he hits more greens.

      Reply

      CraigL

      6 years ago

      I remember a story from one of Harvey Pennick’s books. Pro came to him and said, “I’m missing too many putts and need a putting lesson.” As they left the shop, the pro turned towards the putting green and Harvey turned towards the range. When the pro asked where he was going, Harvey replied, “You don’t have a putting problem, you just don’t hit it close enough to the hole.” Methinks that may be Scotty’s problem looking at the stats. I love my ShotScope and am still learning how best to apply it on the course so as to not skew data. Thanks for all the tips posted here.

      Reply

      shortside

      6 years ago

      Okay. I’ll say it. I average 34.2 putts per round. Mostly from being careless. 31.5 when I’m a bit more focused. That said based on the overall numbers Scott must game a real good foot wedge to be a scratch player.
      Also don’t like the yardage gaps for evaluation. 50-75, 75-100, 100-125 and so on make more sense to me. JMHO.

      Reply

      Kevin Ryan

      6 years ago

      I use shotscope and really like it. Very seamless because of the lack of tagging at the time of the shot. You do have to remember to tag the hole position at each holes conclusion. The problem with the data is that it gathers info for each shot as though it was MEANT to be a full shot. So if someone chips and does flop shots with a sand wedge, that distance average will be skewed. Looking at accuracy from a distance regardless of iron used would be useful. For instance, I will often use an 8 iron from a nine iron distance if I am in the rough because of less solid contact trying to muscle a shot. Also putting from off the green might be confusing which I do often. There is also a small issue of the fact the the course is mapped from google maps, and depending on how often your course is updated the system may think you are off the green when in fact you are on or vice versa. In my case, our new sand traps are not correctly located so it has me doing a pitch or iron shot rather than a bunker shot. Overall though I think it is great technology but you must be careful with what and how you interpret the overwhelming stats you can get.

      Reply

      BRIANM

      6 years ago

      I agree 100%.

      Reply

      Loopy

      6 years ago

      Totally agree & perfectly stated.

      But I will ad they do have good customer support. There was a missing creek on a course I played and I sent them a note to customer service. They had it there in less than 24 hours.

      Reply

      Jimmie

      6 years ago

      Poor green reading CAUSES “first putt distance is too far from the hole” and an “inconsistent strike.” Tell ’em to go to that expertgreenreading site for the fix.

      Reply

      Johnny Penso

      6 years ago

      To be blunt, anyone that looks at those short iron distance stats and concludes that he has a gapping issue or even believes those are his true average distances, shouldn’t be doing statistical analysis. There’s no way a guy that hits it 270 with the big stick hits his 8 iron 120 yards and his pitching wedge 80 yards. You can’t draw conclusions with faulty data.

      Reply

      BRIANM

      6 years ago

      One thing the math may have overlooked is he may hit the par 5’s in two. This could reduce his score by 4 shots. Also he hits is 8 iron sorter than his 9, maybe he uses his 8 for bump and runs.

      Reply

      Nick Aquilino

      6 years ago

      Look at his stats again. Given he hits the green about 75 % of the time with the wedges, the rest of his clubs in the bag maybe average 40% and at an almost 70 foot proximity and you are suggesting he hits every par 5 in two over his best 10 rounds. Don’t think so! Even if he did the math still does not add up only gets him closer to scratch

      Reply

      BRIANM

      6 years ago

      No actually he would need to hit 2 not 4 to average 74.2 as the stats state. The scratch doesn’t mean he averages 72, but would on a slope of 112. If his course has a slope of 129, 74.2 would get him to scratch. Hits 2 of 4 par 5’s. They may have short par 5’s and we already determined he is a fairly long hitter. I am only replying to those who said the numbers don’t add up, they may if he hits 2 par 5’s.

      Biggsy

      6 years ago

      While slope rating is also a measure of difficulty, it’s the course rating that determine your index BrianM. But based on this data and the ‘scratch golfer’bit, I’d guess this is an anecdotal account.

      BRIANM

      6 years ago

      BIGGSY (score-rating) x 113/slope. Since you are dividing the total amount by the slope the slope carries the highest rating. This is directly from the USGA handicap rating formula.

      Dave C

      6 years ago

      BrianM, both rating and slope matter. Rating is a scratch golfer and slope is how hard it is for a bigger golfer (think of y=m*x + b from algebra).

      Handicap Differential = (ESQ Score – Course Rating) X 113 ÷ Slope Rating

      BRIANM

      6 years ago

      My exact equation in my response. USGA states rating is derived from slope rating.

      DaveMac

      6 years ago

      Just to point out the distance anomaly with the 9 iron could be explained in a number of ways, for example. The club was only used of a tee on a short downhill par 3, or the 9 iron has only been used in the last few rounds and the course is now hard and fast.
      ShotScope only records the start and end point of the shot, only the player knows when he intended and the course conditions when the shot was played.

      Reply

      One Day At A Time

      6 years ago

      Haven’t turned in a card in two months, was playing off of a 5.

      Early extension has been my weakness. I manipulate around it but yesterday I committed to an adjustment to address that. e.g., I hit a six iron really high and put a lot of spin on the ball. AoA is, as I describe it, flatter than the Texas Panhandle and the lowest launch I have had for the last 18 months has been between 16.5-18.0, 5800-6100 spin 85-90mph club and 117-123mph ball. Carry generally hasn’t been an issue, I have three clubs I can hit 150 and if I need 177 I can get that out of my 6i. I can get 183 from my 5i. 191 from my Hot Metal 4i. 196 is my maximum carry with a 3i from a very good lie.

      If I’m playing a course with 195-225yd par 3’s, I will often layup and take double out of play but it’s costing me 0.75 shots per hole. If I birdie a par 5 it’s generally because it’s a long par 4.

      To my point- I really felt like I was losing shots because of my wedge play. But I found the gap between my longest iron from an average lie and my average carry w/driver was 85yds.

      I have the advantage of working at a green grass facility and having exposure to a combination of one of the best minds I’ve met in Golf/played at the third highest level in my consideration/understanding how to communicate so others can learn. I have data in spades but it is the second set of eyes and ears that really allowed me to see what is keeping me from making more putts.

      Reply

      Jerry noble

      6 years ago

      Why would you ever lay up on a par three unless you can’t hit it far enough to clear a hazard?

      Reply

      Steve Wright

      6 years ago

      Steve
      9 handicap
      Essex, UK
      short game

      Reply

      Stephen

      6 years ago

      Stephen Johnston
      Whiteleaf UK
      10 handicap
      Approaches – distance control & dispersion

      (And finding fairways, short game distance control, 3 putts – why do I bother!!)

      I have about 18 months of rounds and would be interested in seeing if there are any significantly improving areas over that time or recurring issues?

      Reply

      Joe

      6 years ago

      He needs to work on chipping, pitching and sand. If he misses 9 greens, he shoulf be getting up and down 80 to 85 percent of the time.
      He needs to concentrate one one club for chipping until he gets the 85 %.

      Putting, work on 6 ft, 30 ft and 60 ft putts. In rotation, putt 6ft, make or miss, goal one putt from 6’. Then putt from 30 feet, make or miss , goal two putt. Putt from 60 feet, make or miss, goal two putt. Keepp putting in rotation until you make three of each. If for instance you make your three 6 footers then continue with your 30 and 60 footers.

      Reply

      Derek H

      6 years ago

      I’m a Shot Scope user and I’d love to go through the process. I’ve enjoyed my time with the V2 so far, and further analysis of my numbers would be great. Handicap – 2, Location – Illinois, Areas Requiring Work – I think hitting more fairways and greens in regulation is what keeps me from going low. My putting and short game keep me from going high.

      Reply

      ChrisK

      6 years ago

      he hits his driver so well he doesn’t have to hit the other clubs top-notch. If he’s averaging 270 off the tee, then he likely hits some crappy 250-yard shots to go with some awesome 290-yard shots. The thing is, a LOT of excellent amateur weekend golfers only average 240-250 yard teeshots. Welcome to today’s golf world — hit the big teeball and everything else generally takes care of itself.

      Reply

      Nick Aquilino

      6 years ago

      Don’t care how well he hits his driver if he only hits 9 greens he can’t be scratch. Add it up. !8 drives, 9 shots hit the green, 9 missed green shots and 9 more chips, pitches and bunker shots to get the ball on the green for those greens he misses. That is 45. Leaves him 29 more shots to get to two over. He has one 3 putt. That gets him to 48 shots and leaves just 26 putts to complete the remaining 17 holes. Can’t be done with an average of 3 one putts per round.

      Reply

      Nick Aquilino

      6 years ago

      One more thought. My analysis is based on his scoring average of 2 over par. To be scratch the 10 best scores need to be even par. That means he needs 9 or 10 one putts to average even par if he misses 9 greens per round, not 3.

      Nick Aquilino

      6 years ago

      These stats make no sense at all. First Scott hits roughly 9 greens per round. In order for him to average two over par he would have to one putt seven greens. His stats say he one putts 16%. That is barely 3 one putts per round and averaging one three putt per round that means he has 14 two putts. Can’t have 14 two putts when he needs seven one putts to average +2. These numbers do not compute.

      As for his distances for each club they also make no sense. His wedges are essentially the same, 78-82. A 46 yard difference between the pitching wedge and the 9 iron, the scoring clubs cannot equate to a scratch golfer. Even more unlike a scratch golfer is the 8 iron going 9 yards less than the 8 iron. I was a scratch to 2-3 handicap for better than 40 years. I am now 80 yrs and I have a 60 degree wedge that I hit 70-75 yards, a 58 that is 82-85 and a pw that is 105-115. You can’t be a scratch player and not know how far you hit each club. If that is true for our man Scott, no wonder he did not make it on tour, any tour.

      My feeling is that someone made several mistakes here, either deliberately to emphasize putting stats can be attributed to other parts of the game or without giving much thought to the figures that were presented.

      Whatever the reason, the stats in this article do not represent a scratch player. If you miss the green half the time you better have a great short game and the balls that find the green need to be closer.

      Any comments MGS?

      Reply

      ChrisK

      6 years ago

      totally agree, the stats don’t make a whole lot of sense.

      However, I see some things that i do agree with that I see on a regular basis at my own club — mainly the importance of hitting driver, and hitting it exceptionally well.

      I personally grew up playing at a short 9-hole course, and as i grew older, it turned into a show of teeball, lob wedge, and one putts. Now the club i play at nowadays is 6300 yards from the white tees, and those days for me are over. But i do see young guns out there all the time hitting huge drives (300+) and basically overpowering the golf course like I used to do on my little short course, with birdies and low scores galore.

      The funny thing that i’ve noticed, though, is that they aren’t any better from 150 yards out than i am. But they have WAY MORE short wedges into greens than I do due to that big teeball. And thus they have more birdies.

      Just my two cents worth, but my conclusion is that there’s a crapload of scratch golfers out there that can primarily tag a driver like nobody’s business, but the rest of their game is incredibly average.

      Reply

      Nick Aquilino

      6 years ago

      Yeah we are on the same page for sure. From my experience the young guys do hit a mile, 300+, but are not much better through the green after the drive.

      I understand the premise of the article but as I said you can’t hit 9 greens and only have 3 one putts and a 3 putt a round and be a scratch golfer.

      mackdaddy

      6 years ago

      Cool info. Did Shot Scope do the analisis or my golf spy?

      Reply

      Dave

      6 years ago

      7 handicap
      Beloit, WI
      Weakness: driving the ball in the fairway

      Reply

      Andrew

      6 years ago

      Could his distances be off due to chipping etc. with different clubs? If so- how do you address this with the unit?

      Reply

      Andrew Singleton

      6 years ago

      You say his 3-putt percentage is high but your link to the previous article states scratch golfers 3-putt 7.8% of the time!

      Looks to me like a simple case of mis-labelling his clubs. There’s no way a scratch player wouldn’t notice that sort of lack of distance with a 9 iron.

      Reply

      Regis

      6 years ago

      True story. About 15 years ago I attended a 2 day seminar offered by a renowned instructor. He was great. But his son (who was not great) hosted a putting instruction session. He picked up on the fact that I was less than enthusiastic and he singled me out “You-explain why we three putt “. I politely responded.”Because our first putt starts off too far from the hole”. Statistics are valuable but need to be kept in context.

      Reply

      Kevin

      6 years ago

      Help me out here. He hits less than half the greens in regulation and averages 34 putts a round. How can you be a scratch golfer? Would that set him up to shoot about 79 or 80? That is he misses 9 greens and only one putts 2 greens would on “average” result in at least 7 bogeys. He doesnt one putt enough to make enough birdies and that would not even account for double bogeys or the dreaded “other”.

      What am I missing?

      Reply

      Rhodri Walters

      6 years ago

      18 Handicap
      Broadstairs, Kent. England
      Weakness: Approach Shots

      Reply

      Ben Smith

      6 years ago

      How does the shot scope system compare to arccos 360? I mean which is better at helping a better player like Scott improve over time? I know they’re diffuin terms of how they operate but the goal of improving is basically the same. Looking at stats and seeing where the issues lie to work on them. Which is better. Anyone can you give me some tid bits

      Reply

      Andym

      6 years ago

      Shot scope does not rip you off for $100 pa for your statistics :-). Other than that I have only used the Arccos connect and the Shot Scope stats seem more logical to me. The fact almost all info is on your wrist is great. Only thing can say in favour of Arccos is you have flybys on your phone.

      Reply

      Ben Smith

      6 years ago

      Does arrcos charge something? Like an annual fee. I couldn’t find anything on their site about charging to get access to stats

      Marshall

      6 years ago

      This is fascinating. I’m looking forward to a follow-up article with data after he has his session/s with a fitter. I’m also surprised at the low 8i distance given he is almost 270 off of the tee. Seems like his equipment might be off-spec on more than 1 club OR his clubs are mismarked in the app.

      Reply

      Steve Cernuto

      6 years ago

      I’m shocked a scratch golfer didn’t realize their yardages were off by 15-20 yards with certain clubs. Something in the stats or the handicap is fishy.

      Reply

      strokerAce

      6 years ago

      something seems fishy.
      he’s a 0 handicap.
      he 3 putts at least 1x per round
      he has a low 1 putt percentage
      he hits his 8 iron 119 yards

      how in the world is he a scratch golfer ? I’ve got to be missing something….

      Reply

      Andym

      6 years ago

      I use shotscope. My wedges don’t show huge divergences in distance. Whilst I’d do longer distances when I want with my PW and 56 than my 60 I also do gentle short shots with my PW and 56 bringing average down. Same I use 8i for bump and runs so this takes my average for this club way down. ShotScope gives you other stats that allows you to see the range from minimum to max for each club which expose cause for data. In short though far from a scratch golfer and club distances less the pattern is similar.

      Reply

      Gary Stacey

      6 years ago

      I thought my putting is not very good, but i also think my greens in regulation are poor too.

      Reply

      Matt

      6 years ago

      Matt
      14 handicap
      Toronto, Canada
      SHORT GAME!!!

      Reply

      burnsie

      6 years ago

      Maybe I’m reading it wrong, but it seems to me the problem is more than just the 9-iron. It looks to me like his 9 and 8 are reversed and his PW is too lofted. I’m nowhere near 0, but I hit my similar clubs:

      8-iron 125-135
      9-iron 110-120
      PW 95-105

      Am I wrong??

      Reply

      Jon

      6 years ago

      You are not wrong in my humble, uneducated opinion. You and I are similar in distance (give or take about 5-7 yards depending on day, time, breeze, phase of the moon, etc.) with very similar gapping . I agree with your assessment. Though it may not by loft per se. I used to play with a guy who effectively de-lofted his short irons, hitting them low and farther than you would expect, with a fair amount of variability in results. He was a natural athlete, unlike me, and got away with this a lot of the time as he was able to hit the ball straight, covering for this apparent loft weirdness. Maybe Scott has some of this going on…119 yard 8 iron!? I hit mine 140, and I’m a 25.3!!

      Reply

      Rob Blenkinsop

      6 years ago

      Currently playing off 17 in Newcastle upon Tyne. All round play is pretty much what you’d expect from a high handicap golfer but my real nemesis shots are from inside 80 yards.

      Any help from shotscope would be very welcome

      Reply

      Jared

      6 years ago

      I really hope that you update with the results of the testing/spec check session. It is really weird to me that scratch would be consistently hitting is 9 iron 9 yards further than his 8I on (what I assume is) a matched set of clubs. I know that forged clubs can sometimes get out of spec, but that’s almost an entire club length longer than the 8I, which means the 9I’s loft is probably “strong” by 5-8 degrees. What were the distances of his 7I? Shouldn’t they be within 0-5 yards of the 9I provided he had reasonable gapping for the longer clubs?

      Reply

      vincent schiavo

      6 years ago

      I’m thinking this anecdote is for illustration only and is not an actual situation…if I am mistaken, that’s pretty crazy.

      Reply

      Art

      6 years ago

      The stats were for his chipping and pitching, for which he uses anything from putter to 8i. This isn’t full swing approach analysis.

      Reply

      Jared

      6 years ago

      If full shots are mixed with chips and pitches, then the graphs are misleading and completely pointless. You should never mix apples (full shots) and oranges (chips and pitches) when doing a statistical analysis. This is statistics 101. If they are indeed mixed, I’m really disappointed in MGS because they should know better.

      Tebo

      6 years ago

      55% fairways doesn’t seem “ok” like you stated. I would think >60% would be ideal for a scratcher.

      Reply

      DL

      6 years ago

      I really liked this, please do more of these MGS! I especially want to see a followup afterwards, say 2 months from now.

      Reply

      Dave

      6 years ago

      I love the insight as well, one question that comes to mind is will this eventually be included in the software? I don’t currently have Shot Scope but would seriously consider the purchase if it’s coming

      Reply

      Mike

      6 years ago

      Thought this was cool insight. I just got fitted for irons for the first time because I know my approach shots/greens in regulation is the weakest part of my game. Looking forward to improving this part of my game as well.

      Reply

      golfinnut

      6 years ago

      Interesting stats for a 0 handicap. Yikes! I’d hate to see mine at an 8 if that’s the case. LOL

      Reply

      Martin

      6 years ago

      I love this sort of stuff! One thought though, 125-225 is a huge range, that’s almost an entire bag of clubs! Shouldn’t that range be tightened to 125-175 and then 175+?

      Reply

      Colin Shellard

      6 years ago

      I’d be interested to hear what Shotscope can tell me about my game, and if there are any further refinements that can be user applied to the dashboard to make the data more useful. For instance I find the distances for short irons can be slightly skewed by hitting chips and pitches with them.

      Reply

      Kanoito

      6 years ago

      That’s what the Positional option is for, it excludes the shot from your averages. You can edit it under your dashboard.

      Reply

      Colin Shellard

      6 years ago

      I use “Positional” for lay ups and recovery shots, but hadn’t used them for creative shots into greens when playing under the wind and knockdowns etc.

      Colin Shellard

      6 years ago

      Just realised I hadn’t put down the info requested…
      Handicap 5.5
      Aberdeen, UK
      Shortgame / Approach play

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
    Buyer's Guides
    Apr 12, 2024
    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
    First Look
    Apr 12, 2024
    Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
    News
    Apr 12, 2024
    PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.