The Vertical Groove Driver: Genius or Gimmick?
Drivers

The Vertical Groove Driver: Genius or Gimmick?

The Vertical Groove Driver: Genius or Gimmick?

I used to think I was a pretty smart guy. My high school gave me a diploma with my name on it, and a real brick-and-mortar college presented me with a journalism degree. I even hold a Journeyman Plumber’s license from the State of Massachusetts.

A smart guy? I always thought so.

But today there are doubts.

It started a couple of weeks ago with a $15/dozen golf ball from Costco outdueling the vaunted ProV1 head to head. Raise your hand if you saw that one coming. And Election Day? That was a clear warning shot across the bow of self-proclaimed experts everywhere, regardless of subject matter.

What’s next? Dylan winning the Nobel? Dogs and cats playing together?

So please forgive me for hedging my bets when it comes to what might be the craziest looking driver this side of The Hammer.

Meet the Vertical Groove Driver.

vertical-groove-driver-2

 

Say What?

What you’re looking at, according to Vertical Groove Golf, LLC, is a new technology that’s going to change the game of golf.

Vertical grooves. On the driver.

“Most golfers – 90% – have an outside-in swing,” says Rubin Hanan of Vertical Groove Golf. “That causes the head to come across the ball, so you get a kind of side-spin, which causes your slice. What vertical grooves do, since most people hit the ball towards the heel of the club, is they grab the ball and reduce the spin to keep the ball from slicing so much. You’ll actually see the ball go straighter.”

Hanan says independent testing by Golf Laboratories, Inc out of San Diego shows the Vertical Groove Driver consistently outperforming other top drivers in terms of spin rate and overall distance, as well as shot dispersion.

Could there be something to those grooves?

A 90° Twist

In wedges and short irons, grooves help promote spin. But with mid- to long irons, grooves become more spin-neutral. As lofts get even lower, grooves can help reduce spin. With some drivers, grooves are merely ornamental – many simply have lines painted on the face to look like grooves. However, it’s not uncommon to see drivers with smooth sweet spots and grooves etched into the toe and heel. Some, such as Srixon’s new Z 565 and 765, have grooves etched into the center of the face, as well as the heel and toe.

Bridgestone takes driver grooves to another level, with microgrooves milled into the face of the JGR driver. Vertical microgrooves milled into the toe and heel of the JGR are intended to reduce spin on mishits. The horizontal grooves in the middle of the clubface are arched and get closer together as you go lower on the clubface. The wider grooves maintain spin on high impact, while the tighter grooves and rougher texture decrease spin on low hits.

MyGolfSpy first reported on Bridgestone’s face milling nearly 2 years ago.  The idea of those grooves is to hold the ball in position on the clubface as long as possible (that’s known as CT, or Characteristic Time) to reduce spin. Also, several weeks ago MyGolfSpy Labs published a study on the effects of horizontal (heel-center-toe) impact location on driver performance. The study shows heel impact creating more spin as well as a fade-biased axis tilt and noticeably lower carry and overall distance numbers. Toe impact also increases spin, but with more of a draw-biased axis tilt. Distance is also negatively impacted, but not nearly as much as with heel impact.

An earlier MyGolfSpy Labs report on vertical impact location tells a similar story: high impact reduces both spin and distance, while low impact increases spin and reduces distance considerably. What can be inferred from these results is that anything that reduces or controls spin on heel or toe impact can, in theory, control axis tilt and help the ball go a little straighter and a little farther. And anything that reduces spin on low impact will help the ball go farther, too.

So, in theory, driver grooves – either vertical or horizontal – can reduce spin somewhere in the range of 200 to 300 RPM. Can that keep you in the fairway? The folks at Vertical Groove Golf certainly think so.

“Of course, it depends on the golfer,” says Hanan. “But we’ve seen consistently low spin rates – as low as 1900. We’re mostly in the 2600 to 2800 RPM range.”

Feelin’ Groovy 

Golf inventor Tony Antonious, best known for putting Velcro on golf gloves, patented this type of groove in the late 90’s. Here’s an excerpt:

“The vertical grooves on the club faces of the present invention have a beneficial effect on the ball and tends to generate a forward top spin traction producing a straight-line trajectory. Having only vertical groove face configurations, the vertical groove concept of this invention minimizes adverse direction such as exaggerated slicing or hooking and produces a low trajectory boring ball flight with top spin and increased distance.”

Further, the Antonious patent states the spacing between the grooves impacts sound, feel and energy transfer at impact, and it encompasses vertical grooves on irons and putters as well as metal woods. Hanan says hybrids and irons are in the works.

The Vertical Groove Driver has 17 rows of grooves from heel to toe, but Mike Rossi, Vertical Groove’s R&D Director, tells MyGolfSpy the properties of the head itself are just as important. “The combination of the geometry of our head – the center of gravity, the bulge and roll and our patented face configuration – it just creates launch conditions that work well for a broad range of players.”
vertical-groove-driver-patent

The Vertical Groove Driver is a 450cc head with a rather deep face. “I’d say our head shape is a little different, kind of an older design compared to what’s our there,” says Rossi. “Our CG is a little bit towards the back, which tends to help a lot of people, and it’s a hair higher, which says a bit more spin – but it seems to be optimum for a lot of people.”

So what you have is a slightly compact, deep-faced driver with a slightly mid/back and slightly mid/high center of gravity and a low launch, low spin stock shaft in the Aldila NV2k.

And vertical grooves.

Driver vs. Driver vs. Driver

Rossi tells MyGolfSpy the Golf Labs testing pitted the Vertical Groove Driver head to head against four of today’s top drivers (he didn’t tell us which ones).

“We took their stock, off-the-rack $399 clubs in S flex and compared them to ours, which has the after-market Aldila NV2K shaft,” says Rossi, who spent 16 years as Aldila’s VP of Sales and Marketing. “We also took the stock shafts out of those clubs and used identical Aldila shafts. The results were better carry distance and dispersion. Spin-wise we were comparable or lower.”

Again, this is Vertical Drive’s say-so. While it’s possible, even probable, that grooves affected spin somewhat, it’s likely the driver head and shaft combo also played a key role. We won’t know for sure until we get one to test ourselves.

Once You Go Vertical…

Is the golf world ready for a Vertical Groove jihad? Hanan – a former CEO of Champ Sports and Foot Locker of Canada – is pretty confident.

“You’re always going to have naysayers, especially if you bring out something new,” he says. “But everything that’s ‘new’ is really the same thing over and over again – they’re just moving CG around. Go into any brick and mortar store today, and you’ll see everyone one of those clubs on sale. No one’s bringing anything fresh and new to the industry, except Vertical Groove Golf.”

“If you look at the driver business, everything is recycled,” adds Rossi. “We’re back to composite crowns and titanium frames, and everybody’s talking about moving 25-to-30% of discretionary weight to bias shot patterns. That was being done ten years ago.”

As you might expect, fresh and new does come at a price. The Vertical Groove Driver sells for $399 (you can pre-order one on their website – product is expected to be available next month). Despite the price tag, the driver is non-adjustable and is available in 9.5, 10.5 and 12 degree lofts. The stock shaft is the Aldila NV2k, available in Ladies and Senior flex through XS) and the stock grip is the Golf Pride Tour Velvet. The Aldila Rogue Max 75 or the Mitsubishi Tensei CK Pro White, both low launch, low spin shafts, are offered as upgrades, each at a $200 upcharge.

So, does this thing work, or does it fall somewhere between the Hammer and the Grenade? Well, up until a week or so ago I never would have thought a golf ball that sells for $15 a dozen could compete with the #1 Ball in Golf, so I’m reserving judgment until we can see this thing in the flesh and test it for real.

What do you think?

For more information, visit VerticalGrooveGolf.com.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John is an aging, yet avid golfer, writer, 6-point-something handicapper living back home in New England after a 22-year exile in Minnesota. He loves telling stories, writing about golf and golf travel, and enjoys classic golf equipment. “The only thing a golfer needs is more daylight.” - BenHogan

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

Shot Scope V5 Golf Watch
Apr 3, 2024 | 14 Comments
Driver Shopping Do’s and Don’ts
Mar 29, 2024 | 5 Comments
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Tim Fitzgerald

      6 years ago

      I’m terrible at golf and used this driver and was wayyyy better. My shots were consistent and str8

      Reply

      KM

      7 years ago

      Grooves or no grooves this is a great driver head no doubt!

      Reply

      Thomas

      7 years ago

      As with anything and everything in a competitive market for sale. A gimmick is needed to create a nitch in which to drag in the $$$$

      Reply

      Brian Branson

      7 years ago

      I’m a zero handicap and have bought them all always looking for more distance from a Driver this Driver works its straighter and longer.

      Reply

      tiger168

      7 years ago

      Recycle is right…

      No Grove = no spin? NOT… But, less spin?

      The new Wilson driver winner has No groove…

      I switched to JGR It is awesome!!!

      Reply

      Rob Piña

      7 years ago

      I’m going to go with gimmick since there seems to be 3-4 claims of this nature each year and I haven’t seen one live up to the hype yet. But, rest assured, if it is “longer” and 40% straighter I will happily eat my words and purchase one.

      Reply

      Frozen Spy

      7 years ago

      Why does it need to be longer? If it is comparable to all the other drivers out there as far as distance and reduces sidespin, which most people need, wouldn’t it be worth the money to be in the fairway as opposed to the ruff? Just sayin…

      Reply

      Bags

      7 years ago

      agree

      Reply

      John Davis

      7 years ago

      Gimmick

      Reply

      Carolina Golfer 2

      7 years ago

      Definitely a new thought on driver face. I have learned to never discount something until I actually see the results myslef

      Reply

      Paul Boyd

      7 years ago

      Snake oil

      Reply

      Ian Splisgardt

      7 years ago

      Horizontal grooves help create back spin not side spin

      Reply

      Keith Harris

      7 years ago

      Golfsmith did this with the Snake eyes component line years ago. I couldn’t tell any difference whatsoever.

      Reply

      Bill Presse IV

      7 years ago

      Is the black patch with ‘pimples’ one piece or adhered to the crown? They are probably are there to break up a vacuum pocket and increase aerodynamic properties and stiffen the crown also.

      Reply

      Steve Magan

      7 years ago

      Merit Golf did this 15 years ago and sold 3 drivers total….

      Reply

      Bob Pegram

      7 years ago

      I have some of those sitting around. Merit Golf was U.S. Open and PGA Champion Larry Nelson’s company. These head seem to hit fine. The irons are good quality cavity backs.

      Reply

      Keith Ahrens

      7 years ago

      Think I seen something about Tiger trying it out.

      Reply

      Damon

      7 years ago

      Tough to swallow 399 for gimmick with no green grass testing opportunity, when you can spend 399 on M1 with proven tech.

      Reply

      Robert Fraioli

      7 years ago

      If it worked TaylorMade would already be making it !

      Reply

      Aaron

      7 years ago

      They don’t have the pattents so they can’t do it if they wanted to. They will just keep popping out drivers every 6 months with little diffrence between them.

      Reply

      Lance Warheit

      7 years ago

      My driver has a nearly smooth face

      Reply

      Mike Warheit

      7 years ago

      Nothing can make you straighter, not even marriage. And before a sassy comeback, you own a life size cardboard cutout of Ricky Fowler

      Reply

      Kent Warheit

      7 years ago

      Gimmick, the sweet spot on all drivers had no groove, you don’t want spin on a driver, grooves of any sort would give it spin.

      Reply

      McaseyM

      7 years ago

      Testing will tell. If they are confident and want to get verified, they should participate in the Most Wanted Testing. MGS should get some good numbers. I’d like to see this driver with the grooves set up horizontally to determine if the grooves truly make a difference.

      Reply

      baudi

      7 years ago

      Nice Infomercial. Please add a real test in which the claim of less sidespin is examined thoroughly. ‘Forward top spin traction’ sounds great but implausible.

      Reply

      Tedd Branstetter

      7 years ago

      The grooves don’t make a damn bit of difference on the club face of the driver. It could have no grooves at all and it wouldn’t matter. This is just marketing hype and there is no science at all to back it up.

      Reply

      Dave

      7 years ago

      “If you look at the driver business, everything is recycled,” adds Rossi. “We’re back to composite crowns and titanium frames, and everybody’s talking about moving 25-to-30% of discretionary weight to bias shot patterns. That was being done ten years ago.”

      “You’re always going to have naysayers, especially if you bring out something new,” he says. “But everything that’s ‘new’ is really the same thing over and over again – they’re just moving CG around. Go into any brick and mortar store today, and you’ll see everyone one of those clubs on sale. No one’s bringing anything fresh and new to the industry, except Vertical Groove Golf.”

      Ahem… Killer Bee driver from 2006! http://www.jeffsheetsgolf.com/killer-bee—past-projects

      Looks like this isn’t so “fresh and new,” and was also “being done ten years ago.”

      Golf marketing!

      Reply

      ChristopherKee

      7 years ago

      I was just about to post the Killer Bee driver as well.

      Reply

      Joe Burnett

      7 years ago

      I can’t see this becoming popular. I remember a driver (around 2005) came out with “vertical grooves.” That sure didn’t work out.

      If vertical grooves were effective, it would have been discovered before 2016.

      Reply

      Steve Thorne

      7 years ago

      Lots of long winded answers here…lol.. Grooves on a driver are as useful as a screen door on a submarine.

      Reply

      Kenny B

      7 years ago

      So, what’s the technology behind the bumps on top? Since there is no mention of these in the patent, I suspect they are for “looks”. However, I would think that they would cause drag and slower swing speed. Has anyone tested the airflow?

      Reply

      John Barba

      7 years ago

      Don’t know if anything’s been tested, but Rubin Hanan told me the bumps don’t do much – mostly there for show.

      Reply

      Brian Haskell

      7 years ago

      Test it!

      Reply

      Jamie Wilkes

      7 years ago

      Looking into it immediately ?

      Reply

      Gil Bloomer

      7 years ago

      Compare it to the TaylorMade M1 and then get back to us.

      Reply

      Lee Shaw

      7 years ago

      So did the Callaway FTiZ square piece of Sh*te until Phil hit it 70 yards off line on the 1st at the Masters!

      Reply

      蕭德福

      7 years ago

      I don’t think it has functions as its description. COR and CG were both two key factors for distance.

      Reply

      Kelly Thompson

      7 years ago

      Definitely reminds me of the Killer Bee Sting from 2006-2007ish.

      Reply

      Scott Romines

      7 years ago

      there is only one way to truly find out……get some to MGS for testing

      Reply

      Jim Dusbiber

      7 years ago

      I thought grooves of any kind on a driver made no impact on distance, spin, etc…. ?

      Reply

      Jari Hakonen

      7 years ago

      Golfsmith’s Killer Bee is back!! No??

      Reply

      Luke Woozi Reuter

      7 years ago

      Highly doubt that if u have been fitted recently ..

      Reply

      Tom Doughty

      7 years ago

      Pow!

      Reply

      Geo Golfx

      7 years ago

      For fun, look up the Cubic Balance Grooveless Driver :) Circa 1993-4

      Reply

      Chad Mardesen

      7 years ago

      The majority of spin, if you buy into this on a driver you might be a little delusional, is imparted perpendicular to the grooves. Therefore, this driver will be shorter (less backspin for lift) and less straight (more side spin perpendicular to the grooves).

      It’s all hooey anyway because grooves on a driver are largely purposeless. They are too shallow and sparse to impart too much spin.

      Imagine the same vertical pattern on an iron. Even if it mattered, which on a driver it doesn’t, it would work exactly the opposite of how it’s being marketed.

      Reply

      Jeff Hall

      7 years ago

      Would you quit talking facts… sheesh…

      Reply

      Tony Burn

      7 years ago

      Driver grooves are 95% aesthetic and pretty much solely meant for alignment. Most of the time there aren’t any even on the sweet spot. But Chad is right, compare this to a standard grooved club and it will be a much lower and curved ball flight, not longer.

      Reply

      Colin Diggs

      7 years ago

      Giggity

      Reply

      jlukes

      7 years ago

      Did they commit to sending one to MGS for testing?

      Reply

      MyGolfSpy

      7 years ago

      We invited. They responded. But far as I know have not committed yet.

      Reply

      Christian Furu

      7 years ago

      It looks very straight. Other drivers are more rounded.

      Reply

      Mike Mueller

      7 years ago

      I’m curious to see if it’s straighter. But longer? I don’t see it. Everyone already maxed thr C.O.R. so I don’t see what other tech could trump that. Unless they significantly reduced headweight to increase SS. Possibly aerodynamics? Just spitballing but it’ll be interesting to see.

      Reply

      Bryan Pomerleau

      7 years ago

      I thought Wilson already figured this out with there contest they have going on….. hah

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.