Titleist Launches 718-Series Irons – 6 New Models
Irons

Titleist Launches 718-Series Irons – 6 New Models

Titleist Launches 718-Series Irons – 6 New Models
“Golfers trust Titleist to design and manufacture the premier irons in the game and not make any sacrifices.” – Josh Talge, Vice President of Marketing, Titleist Golf Clubs

We’re not ones to sugarcoat, so let’s be blunt; Q2 of 2017 was not kind to Titleist.

Year Over Year club sales down 21%. That’s in the first spring following the launch of the 917 Driver.

Year Over Year Ball Sales, the lifeblood of the Titleist business, down 6.6%. That’s in the first few months following the launch of a new Pro V1.

All of that is real, and none of it is particularly good news for Titleist, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t cause for optimism and excitement within the company and among its fans.

The 718 Series

With the release of more iron sets than you can count on one hand, Titleist is hoping to put Q2 in the rearview, and hopefully, recapture the attention of a consumer that has slowly drifted towards its competitors.

All of the requisite rumblings that accompany releases of this magnitude suggest Titleist is a company that believes it’s poised to make a strong statement, perhaps even a comeback of sorts with its 718 lineup; inarguably its most robust iron lineup ever.

6 Models

As I hinted at above, Titleist’s 718 lineup includes 6 models. Mainstays AP1, AP2, T-MB, CB, and MB are joined by a new model, the AP3. We’ll get to that in a minute.

Across the entire lineup, the consistency of the bullet points is exactly what you’d expect from Titleist.

Not one for hyperbole, Titleist forgoes anything akin to SpeedFoam (it offers not so much as a dollop). While it perhaps overemphasizes its use of Tungsten as much as any of its competitors, the benefits are at least quantifiable, and so while its use is often discussed, it’s generally in matter of fact tones.

As you’ll see, Titleist does make its fair share of distance claims, but as if hedging for the betterment of the golfer, those claims are generally accompanied by the reassurance that Titleist’s particular flavor of longer doesn’t come at the expense of accuracy and green holding power, and it always includes the strong recommendation that you get a proper fitting to find the Titleist 718 iron that’s right for you.

718 is about maximizing MOI and ball speed, while maintaining the proper launch, trajectory and shot-stopping control that players need to hit greens more consistently. Irons are scoring clubs. It’s about hitting your number and stopping the ball close to the pin. Even with distance-focused irons like 718 AP1 and AP3, which are just as long or even longer than the competition, the ultimate goal was playable and repeatable distance. When it comes to hitting a good iron shot, distance without control is meaningless. – Marni Ines, Director, Titleist R&D Irons Development

So now that we’re on the same page with the Titleist approach let’s look at what each iron brings to the table.

718 AP1

ap1-2

Titleist doesn’t do Super Game-Improvement, so that leaves the AP1 as the most-forgiving iron in the Titleist lineup.

The most noteworthy change is a move to a progressive design. Long irons feature hollow-body construction that pushes the CG down and back for higher launch. The mid and short irons offer a large undercut cavity for better trajectory control.

For the distance obsessed, Titleist puts the gains at 2.6 MPH more ball speed and 5.8 yards over the 716 AP1, but it’s important to note that data is from the 4-iron and may not translate to the entire set.

To an extent, it’s uncharacteristically Titleist and reads a bit like a company bending to the demands of the modern consumer who doesn’t always know what’s best for his game. So, I say enjoy the numbers for what they are, but keep your focus on tighter dispersion with more stopping power.

The 718 AP1 has a retail price of $125 per club ($999 8-piece set) steel and $140/$1,199 for graphite.

718 AP3

718AP3

The new addition to the Titleist iron franchise is the AP3. Titleist’s positions the AP3 between the AP1 and the AP2, which you’d think would call for an AP1.5, but the story here is that the new model borrows from some of the best elements of both the AP1 and AP2.

It’s simple math, people: AP1 + AP2 = AP3.

“The invention of AP3, which combines the distance and forgiveness of our best-selling, game-improvement AP1 iron with the look and feel of our tour-favorite AP2, is a significant advancement that will help a wide range of golfers, and further illustrates why more of the world’s best players have Titleist irons in their bags.” – Josh Talge

From a market standpoint if not for one small detail, the AP3 would fit perfectly in what our Chris Nickel just yesterday described the Forged Distance category. The rub here is that the AP3 isn’t forged, but like most of the irons that fit the description, what we’re talking about is forgiveness in a visually compact design.

Think PXG or the TaylorMade P790. Looks like one thing, plays like another; that’s the goal.

According to Titleist, the AP3 incorporates lessons learned during the creation of its premium C16 product into what it’s calling its longest, fastest player’s iron ever.

As the category demands, the AP3 features the compact shape preferred by better players, while offering the forgiveness less than better players such as myself need (desperately).

The AP3’s speed comes from its hollow-body paired with a thin and unsupported L-Face. The MOI comes from nearly 85 grams of Tungsten in each of the long and mid iron heads, which helps maintain ball speeds across the entire face.

This distance claim here is 1.5 MPH and 6.4 yards over the 716 AP2, and again, that comes from robot whacking a 4-iron.

Let’s not get too wrapped up in that detail because while the AP3 might be long and fast, according to Titleist, the distance boost doesn’t come at the expense of the spin necessary to hold greens and that’s a detail the importance of which I can’t overemphasize, which is why I’m going to keep hitting you over the head with it throughout this entire story.

The 718 AP3 retails for $162.50 per club ($1,299 set) steel and $187.50/$1,499 graphite.

718 AP2

ap2-2

With the AP2 you more or less know what you’re going to get. That’s not a statement meant to undersell the AP2, but the fact of the matter is that Titleist has a good thing on its hands, and so other than the requisite amount of refinements a 2-year cycle dictates, the company isn’t about to mess with it.

The 718 version features a thinner forged body with a high-strength spring steel face. That’s what gets you a bit of extra distance while an improved CG progression – particularly in the long irons – provides better performance on mishits.

As you would expect the AP2 retains its tour-preferred profile and its signature feel, while a change to the leading edge provides more efficient turf interaction.

Apart from an appreciably refined aesthetic, we’re not talking about a significant change, but for those who are interested, the distance claim with the AP2 is 1 MPH and 2.4 yards over the previous model. But again, irons are scoring clubs and the AP2’s story is about control, precision, and holding greens instead of rolling over them.

The 718 AP2 retails for 162.50 per club ($1,299 set) steel and $187.50/$1,499 steel.

718 T-MB

718TMB

The utility club that became a full set offering, the T-MB might also fit in the forged distance category, except, well…You know, it’s not forged, which frankly shouldn’t matter. Billed by Titleist as Modern Muscle, like the AP3, the T-MB features foam-free hollow-body construction in a relatively compact package. An average of 93.9 grams of Tungsten in the toe and help provide the desired launch conditions while boosting stability.

As it did with the AP2, Titleist has improved the CG progression to bring launch numbers closer to optimal throughout the set. And while, yes, there is another distance boost for those of you who want it, (1.2 MPH and 1.1 yards over the 716 T-M) it’s not just about launching high and flying far, it’s about landing soft with the kind of stopping power that allows aggressive players to hunt flagsticks.

The 718 T-MB retails for $249 per club ($1999 set) steel and $275/$2199 graphite.

718 CB

718CB

The classic players cavityback in the Titleist lineup; the 718 CB gets more than a touch of modern from…You guessed it, Tungsten. And while that reads like an ongoing industry cliché, it’s also true that the added mass it provides allows designers to do things from a launch and forgiveness standpoint they simply can’t do with steel alone.

Beyond the subtle refinements, as with the AP2, you more or less know what you’re getting here. The addition of a progressive CG height helps optimize trajectory at each loft, without compromising the classic CB profile.

You won’t find any distance claims here. The CB is 100% about trajectory control and shotmaking precision.

The 718 CB retails for $162.50 per club ($1,299 set) steel and $187.50/$1,499 graphite.

718 MB

718MB

What’s a Titleist lineup, or any iron lineup for that matter, without a blade?

Titleist suggests the 718 MB is for the purist and that’s certainly true. You know the drill here – thin toplines, narrow soles, minimal offset and an entirely compact design. Workability and trajectory control? Sure. Forgiveness? Maybe a little, but certainly not much.

That is the nature of nearly every MB, and the 718 stays true to that.

The 718 MB retails for $162.50 per club ($1,299 set) steel and $187.50/$1,499 graphite.

Specifications

718-spec

Looking at the specs, the AP1 and AP3 standout for their strong (even by loft-jacked standards) lofts. A 21° 4-iron bookended by a 43°PW and two Gap Wedges (48° and 53°) doesn’t exactly align with distance without compromising green-holding power story, but it’s also important to remember that loft is just a number, and it seldom paints the complete picture of performance.

It’s dicey for sure, but I’m reserving final judgment until we get a chance to see what the ball flight looks like.

Stock Shafts

stock-shafts

The stock shaft in the AP1, AP3, and AP2 is True Temper’s AMT series (Red – AP1, Black – AP3, Tour White – AP2). Titleist used the AMT in the 716 AP2 with good results, so it makes sense to carry it through to the entire AP lineup.

For those unfamiliar with the concept, in a traditional shaft set, all of the shafts are the same weight. With AMT (ascending mass technology) shaft weight increases by 3 grams as you move from the long to the short irons. The idea is that lighter long iron shafts facilitate higher launch and more head speed, while heavier short iron shafts provide more control.

The remaining stock shaft options include Project X PXi (T-MB), Project X LZ (CB) and the standard Project X (MB). Titleist has traditionally offered a better selection of shafts than anyone else in the industry, and that hasn’t changed with the 718 lineup. Several additional options are available at no upcharge.

The Final Word

ap-family

It’s overstating it to say that the 718 lineup is make or break for Titleist, but its release comes at the time when the company could benefit from a shift in momentum. It’s a compelling, aesthetically improved lineup, made more compelling still by the inclusion of the new AP3, but the reality is the market is highly competitive market right now, and Titleist’s rep isn’t quite what it used to be.

Callaway is a strong number one and that allows it the luxury of holding its next Apex until basically whenever it feels like it needs fresh momentum. TaylorMade has its most robust and aesthetically pleasing lineup in years, and Mizuno is poised to launch its MP-18 franchise at a time when the company is experiencing a bit of a renaissance on tour. PXG continues to make its presence felt bigly in the premium market.

I do not doubt that the 718 lineup will resonate – and loudly so – with the loyal #TeamTitleist crowd, but if the company is going to gain any appreciable market share, it’s going have to expand its reach and take a cut from its competitors.

That’s no easy task.

The challenge in that is that Titleist doesn’t design for the launch monitor with the same fervor as the market leaders. Descent angles and green-stopping power while critical elements of proper fitting and strong performance, don’t offer quite the same sex appeal as 5 more yards – and lookout if one shot goes another 5 yards still. Sold! Strokes Gained and the kind of metrics that suggest lower scores; the average guy isn’t thinking about that stuff. Just make the ball go far, like Epic far.

Within this reality, if Titleist is going to do more than maintaining the status quo, it will need to rely more heavily than ever on experienced fitters who can explain to the distance hungry masses why consistently high and soft will better translate to lower scores than long and sometimes longer.

Again, that’s no easy task.

New Titleist 718 irons will be available in golf shops worldwide beginning 9/29, with fittings beginning 9/1.

For more information about the Titleist 718 iron lineup, visit Titleist.com.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Brad Shepard

      5 years ago

      Tony, what did you think of the AP3 after you got them into studio and hit them? I’m considering getting them to replace my 4-6 iron. I’d probably bend them weak so they flow into my ap2 at the 7. I just dont want to work as hard at 190 yards and up. Very curious about what you thought of them after hitting them. Doubly curious if you compared tgem to the i210, which is the other iron i am considering. Thanks.

      Reply

      David York

      6 years ago

      Bought the AP1 718, one of the nicest irons I have ever played. Feel great when striking the ball on a good day.

      Reply

      Ken Childs

      6 years ago

      I tried out the AP3 compared to the Ping G400 and 712 API in my bag. Very pleased to say AP3 hit further and felt like a forged club. I’m a 20+ handicapper however I found the AP3 a worthy replacement for my 6 year old AP1’s. I especially liked the new steel shaft which I will strongly consider to replace my current graphic shafts. It was a stiff demo vs. my regular yet still performed superbly.

      Reply

      Dan

      7 years ago

      Stop the loft jacking already. It’s beyond embarrassing. I’m sticking with my 714s until high lofts come back in style.

      Reply

      Kyle

      7 years ago

      Finally a clean looking iron from Titleist, only took a few years. Here’s the deal, titleist forged irons have never had the soft feel of mizuno or callaway, they have always felt hard and are clicky. Their driver pales in comparison to the epic and m1, it’s basically the same as last season with weight ports. The prov1 has been beaten by Taylormades new 5 piece ball. Now, on tour the prov1 and their dollars they pay will always be a favorite, but all of the local pros I know have ditched the prov1 for the new TM ball, and it’s phenomenal. In fact, I cannot think of one area where their products truly stand out from the pack, and I used to be a big titleist fanboi, not anymore.

      Reply

      FyearoldGolfer

      7 years ago

      I’ll be looking for a used set of the AP3s Jan-Feb 2020, priced $300-$400, not a penny more. I (unfortunately) own every Titleist irons set manufactured since 1991, including all the cast DCI-B 1996-2000 versions. But I can tell you one truth, it’s the indian, not the arrow, get fitted, practice, maybe replace your iron set after 6 years (unless you hit 600 balls per practice, 3-4 days a week). Titleist has found the ceiling of what golfers a willing to pay for Pro V1’s, MSRP should drop from $56 dozen to $48 dozen, street price $36.99-$39.99 dozen. Market research must be lacking, the number of golfers are dropping, and more are leaving as prices go up. There are people who will pay $3-4000 for “premium” clubs, let them, it will not help them one iota.

      Reply

      Paul Gerencher

      7 years ago

      I have the TMB 3 iron, its phenomenal

      Reply

      Donny Light

      7 years ago

      Might have to go and demo the ap3.

      Reply

      808nation

      7 years ago

      Same here, AP3 has best of both worlds. Performance and forgiving ?

      Reply

      Matt Dumble

      7 years ago

      I’d love a set of CBs 3-PW, maybe swap out the 3 iron for an AP2.

      Reply

      Steve S

      7 years ago

      While I haven’t bought a new set of irons since 2007, I’ve hit about everything out there. While Titleist has a great tradition and makes a quality product I’ve never been impressed with the performance of their irons. They look great but I find that Mizuno play better. For that matter M2’s play as well and are more forgiving at a lower price point. YMMV….

      Reply

      Eye4golf

      7 years ago

      With staggering sales in both clubs and balls I understand why they filled a rediculous lawsuit against Costco. Market is flat, and will continue for quite some time due to the power struggle in DC government.

      Reply

      Garry

      7 years ago

      I shorted GOLF(Titleist) at 21. I will cover when it gets down to 12. That is what the stock is worth. No growth possible in a stagnant industry. To many ball competitors hammering sales. Dead in the water.

      Reply

      Johnny Cowboy

      7 years ago

      Uh, what???

      Reply

      Marion

      7 years ago

      How would the AP3 compare to the Hogan PTX irons?

      Reply

      Matt Bellner

      7 years ago

      I like the T-MB but I would definitely want to get fitted. Trying to figure out when a golfer (me) can transition from game improvement irons to something more advanced.

      Reply

      Alex McCormack

      7 years ago

      “The distance hungry masses” could do with taking an extra club and think about what the ball is going to do when it lands rather than feed their ego with what number is on the sole of the club…

      Reply

      JTL

      7 years ago

      One question: in the description for the T-MB, you say it’s not forged and that shouldn’t matter. Why exactly should it not matter? The iron being cast and not forged most definitely plays a role in how soft the club feels. And if it’s competing against other clubs in the “forged distance” category, it certainly matters to people who are trying to decide between different sets.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      7 years ago

      I think forged vs cast is one of the most misunderstood, most mislead by mythology topics among golfers. There’s been a couple of articles written on the topic lately, but it boils down to this:

      With respect of feel, It has nothing to do with the manufacturing method; it’s the material (the steel) and it’s the geometry.

      Once upon at time forgings used softer steel, while castings often leveraged harder materials.

      And so the myth that forged feels better was born – few actually considered the materials.

      As heat treatments have improved, manufacturers have been able to cast metals that were traditionally used exclusively in forgings – eliminating the material feel advantage for forgings.

      Bottom line, if I gave you two clubs that were exactly the spec with the only difference being one was forged and the other cast, your ability to tell the difference would essentially be a guess…a toss of the coin.

      That’s the material aspect.

      Beyond the materials, feel is a byproduct of design. What does the forged space in the market look like? It’s MBs, players CBs…compact designs with a good bit of the mass positioned at the impact location. It’s clubs that are sold with feel as part of the story, but they feel better not because of the manufacturing process, they feel better because of the design, the shape.

      Your traditional castings; GI/SGI designs with the mass at the perimeter which while good for MOI, do have a feel consequence. This is what I mean by geometry.

      Bigger heads with more distributed weight don’t feel as soft. As part of the same conversation, we also hear golfers say that forged clubs are inherently less forgiving.

      As with feel, if I gave you two clubs – 1 cast, 1 forged – with exactly the same geometry and distribution of weight, the forgiveness/MOI would be the same.

      So to reiterate, *feel* is essentially derived from 2 things:

      Materials
      Geometry

      It does not come from forging vs. casting, which is why I said it shouldn’t matter.

      Reply

      chemclub

      7 years ago

      Thank you for thorough and well-articulated response Tony. I have all but given up on trying to explain this to people but I might just send them your comment.

      “I think forged vs cast is one of the most misunderstood, most mislead by mythology topics among golfers.”

      Truth.

      John

      6 years ago

      I bought the 718 AP3’s with Recoil shafts and they feel just like the forged sets I’ve played. It’s one of the most amazing irons I’ve played in years. Very long, straight, high trajectory, soft feel and tight dispersion. I can also draw or fade them when needed with ease. I hope this helps, but get fit first.

      Christopher

      7 years ago

      A fantastic looking line-up, I’m not sure about releasing all six together, Mizuno broke their JPX and MP line-ups apart for releases, but Titleist do things the Titleist way. I also think the average consumer is going to be confused with putting the AP3 in the middle of the AP line-up. Maybe AP2’s could have been rebranded APTour?

      Reply

      Tim Dotson

      7 years ago

      AP3’s have my attention for sure

      Reply

      Rich

      7 years ago

      I am what many call a club “ho” so I play a very large number of irons but still, in my mind, Ping and Titleist remain the class of the industry. I really hope Titleist doesn’t go down the road of Taylormade and Callaway, becoming what seems to me to be more or less hucksters. I think the Taylormade M2 irons look cheap and plastic whereas the Ap1 716 irons (or the Ping I E1 irons) that I play look to me like legit functional irons. I know this is simply my opinion but I would really hate to see what I believe to be one of the last “traditionalist” club makers go over to simply chasing the crowd with one gimmick after another. Yet, this is a business and if they are having financial difficulties I am sure there will be great pressure to keep up with the Jones — after all, this is America!

      Reply

      Johnny Cowboy

      7 years ago

      From what I have seen and read the AP3’s and AP1’s perform pretty much the same. The look is different and the AP3’s are much more expensive.

      Reply

      Stephen Allen

      7 years ago

      Just wondering why the AP3’s would be the same prices as the AP2’s if they are not forged? In a time when Titleist is after market share i would have expected them to come in slightly lower in price.

      Reply

      Vo Duy Bach

      7 years ago

      i would prefer a mix between the mb ap2 and tmb

      Reply

      JLS

      7 years ago

      Great write up but I’m somewhat conflicted about one of the author’s central points regarding the consumers desire for distance in their iron shots. Specifically because the distance marketing strategy was a significant part of what lead to the downfall of TaylorMade. Also in regards to distance this article doesn’t discuss the new hybrids that are also being released. Recall that Titleist shifted release cycles with the hybrids to match irons rather than woods. I think this was a good decision since hybrids are long iron replacements. For this same reason the author is correct, this is a very important release for Titleist as it’s not just a $1,300 iron set that’s at stake but also $250-$500 of hybrids. If the fitters are doing their job properly not only will they fit clubs lie/loft/length etc. but they will show consumers that they have a club in their bag for the shots they need to make out on the golf course (trajectory, spin, descent angle, and yardage). Personally, I’m interested in hitting this set, I currently play the 714 AP2 model. I didn’t like the aesthetics of the 716 line up but this release looks more refined in my opinion.

      Reply

      Carolina Golfer 2

      7 years ago

      Titleist hasn’t “officially” launched the 818 Hybrids yet. Probably will follow shortly, in that they want the 718 irons to get sole attention now.

      Reply

      Robert Canady

      7 years ago

      AP3 will have my full attention at the #TeamTitleist Invitational!!

      Reply

      Alan

      7 years ago

      Excellent article, but you really did not discuss the elephant in the room. TITLEIST IS IN FINANCIAL/BUSINESS DIFFICULTY !!

      The PRO v1 while still king has been eroded by a number of competitors. Balls were the company’s biggest money maker and brand name recognition leader.

      The irons while very nice looking are more of an continuing evolution rather than a new approach, i.e.. design, metallurgy, price, etc.

      Titleist is too big and needs scales to succeed and with golf equipment sales continuing to decline year over year, UNLESS they can take big share away from CALi and TM, their troubles will continue to grow !!!

      Reply

      Justin Bordwell

      7 years ago

      When tmb comes forges I will be begging for change on the street corner

      Reply

      Luke Hoffman

      7 years ago

      I’ve seen all of them in person and the AP3 is phenomenal. To me the others didn’t change much, but still solid looking irons.

      Reply

      cgasucks

      7 years ago

      Wow. The 718 AP2 is probably the prettiest AP2 since the 2008 model.

      Reply

      Chris Greenlee

      7 years ago

      Ap3 looks intriguing

      Reply

      Randy Waddell

      7 years ago

      I love the look of the new AP3!!! I agree that the Ap2 has a better look than past models. Titleist appears to be listening to customers and moving their designs in a positive direction for form and function.

      Reply

      Carolina Golfer 2

      7 years ago

      Thanks for the look at the new lineup. Some really good info there, I havent’ seen in other places.

      I think it’s a very valid question/point that Titleist will need to move some share from other companies, in addition to relying on the loyal Titleist customers, to make their 2 year upgrade.

      It’s very competitive era for irons right now, with so many solid offerings out there.

      I’m very excited to try the AP3 and possibly the AP2, but I feel I’m more that tweener. But my only disappointment is the pricing for the AP3 is the same as the forged offerings without being forged.

      I understand it has some technology that the AP1 doesn’t. But I think to the casual consumer, they equate price and forged together. Just my opinion.

      Reply

      chemclub

      7 years ago

      IMHO the look of the AP2 has improved over previous models. I found previous AP2 a little to “plastic badge-y” for my taste. I think the design on the new AP3 is top notch. The C16 struck me as bloated and bulbus. The back of the AP3 makes it look like there is something cool going on in that head.

      Reply

      Carolina Golfer 2

      7 years ago

      Good assessment of the looks. I think they did a great job improving the badging on the AP1 as well. I had the 716 AP1’s and mainly moved on due to the size, but when I compared the badging to some other offerings like Srixon, I felt it was definitely not as classy.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.