Titleist Launches T200 & T300 Irons on Tour
Irons

Titleist Launches T200 & T300 Irons on Tour

Titleist Launches T200 & T300 Irons on Tour

Like the inevitable deflation a balloon with a microscopic pinhole, the long slow leak of the next generation of Titleist irons continues. Last week it was the T100 hitting the tour (with a few making it into play at the US Open1). This week at TPC River Highlands, the T200 and T300 irons will be on display.

Officially the tour debut gives Titleist’s Tour Reps the opportunity to work with players and fit them into the new irons, utilities, and hybrids. Unofficially, it’s an opportunity for Titleist to tease us about what’s coming while making sure the photo quality positively represents the product in a way USGA photos seldom do.

As some of you may know, a less than flattering image of the T300 for real leaked a couple of weeks back. The initial response to the iron has been less than favorable with one MyGolfSpy Community member commenting that he had to check his calendar to make sure it wasn’t April Fools day.

Yikes. How about now?

Initial reactions to new designs typically slant contrary, but with higher quality images now in play, we should have a better idea of the prevailing sentiment over what is inarguably a significant overhaul, and perhaps an over-modernization of what was, until last week, Titleist’s signature AP lineup.

While Titleist hasn’t shared technical details or even where each of the new irons fits in the lineup, we’ve been told that the T100 replaces the AP2, the T200 is the new AP3, while the T300 is the amalgamated love child (my words) of the T-MB and the AP1.

Notably, the T200 features what appears to be a cavity weight labeled MAX IMPACT. The visible portion of the T300’s unique back cavity design also features a stylized version of Mi, which I’m going to crawl out on the world’s shortest limb and assume also stands for Maximum Impact. Bottom line, expect some sort of speed story compelling enough that you’ll immediately want to take any minimal or even moderate impact irons out of your bag. If you’ve got high impact irons in the bag already, it’s a judgment call.

Kidding aside, I’ll leave the door cracked for the possibility that Titleist will take a radically different approach and not push speed, but rather the idea that its new irons will have the maximum (positive) impact on your scores. Perhaps maximum impact describes the collision with the green as the ball descends at an effective landing angle with playable spin rates. Wouldn’t that be something?

Still under wraps, for now, is a T400. While details are vague, I suspect it will prove to be the most forgiving offerings we’ve seen from Titleist in…well…forever.

I’m just short of obligated to point out that Titleist is the number 1 played iron on the PGA Tour (it has been for five straight years and 14 of the last 15 seasons. Toss in #1 driver (most weeks), #1 Hybrid, #1 Wedge, and of course, #1 Ball, and while there’s always an element of pay for play in tour counts, it’s an impressive level of domination. The challenge for Titleist, as I’ve mentioned before, is translating that tour success to the retail environment where market share numbers for its iron offerings have dipped in recent years.

As was the case with the TS metalwoods line, it stands to reason the rebranding is an effort to put something fresh, different, and quantifiably better on the shelf, and with a little luck, generate some interest from golfers who’ve strayed to Titleist’s competitors in recent years.

Do you think it will work?

1 After publication, Titleist reached out to let us know that at the US Open, Charles Howell III played a mixed set of T100 and 620 CBs along with a TS3 hybrid, Cameron Smith played T100 in his 4-9 irons along with a U-500 3-Iron, and Justin Thomas played a T100 4-iron.

For You

For You

News
Apr 15, 2024
We’re Witnessing Greatness With Scheffler’s Dominance
Golf Accessories
Apr 15, 2024
Temu Finds: Saplize Putting Suite
Partner Content
Apr 15, 2024
Five Hidden Gem UK and Ireland Golf Tours
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      TC

      4 years ago

      I can’t understand how people could perceive these as ugly. This series is the most gorgeous thing Titleist has ever released!

      Reply

      Danny

      5 years ago

      I was fit for new irons at Manchester Lane. Ordered the T200. I’ve been playing the AP2 714 for past 5 years. My club pro is using the T100’s and he said the best Titleist irons he has ever hit. During my fitting the T200 had a great feel. Top line looks as good as the old AP2. All the pros testing them said they are best Titleist has ever produced. We will see soon. All of these irons are beginning to ship this week.

      Reply

      Pedro

      5 years ago

      Come on guys/gals. My pro is raving about the new models when I tried to order some new titleist irons this year (current irons Taylormade rsi tp) . The Ap2 have been around forever and even with an x100 shaft I hit the 6 iron like a vertical 8 iron and hated them.. you complain about ugly but probably played the ping eye2 when it first came out.. yeah they worked but at address what a mind change that was.. ???

      Reply

      Kyle

      5 years ago

      Have to wait and see how/what these clubs perform, look and feel like. Numbers don’t lie. I’ve also been saying this is all fine however, Mizuno is almost in the bullpen for a new release so lets just see how this all stacks out. On a serious note, Titleist needs to get off this teaser/release in June only to let the general consumer actually purchase these new offerings in October. If they want to grab attention why can’t they do this is January for a March/April release date when it really matters…Just saying.

      Reply

      Spitfisher

      5 years ago

      It always fascinates me when players talk about looks, rather than performance. The ball does know what is hitting it.

      For all you titleist loyalists out there describing the looks, ugliness etc. od the T100-200-300. BTW I believe the AP1-2-3 will fade away shortly. Please consider Titleist as company is owned by the Koreans, Fila to be exact. Why bring this up? simple the company was sold in 2011, the marketing direction and market share has been threatened as of late and they need product for all golfers, not just good golfers. Consequently cost of goods, manufacturing costs, marketing and advertising costs all play a role in sales of these irons.

      This no longer your father’s Titleist company anymore, this company must survive beyond golf ball sales. It will be thru clubs including the “ugly” ones

      Reply

      Dave T

      5 years ago

      For a company with a reputation of class and tradition like Titleist has, the T200 and T300 irons look like junk, and I say this as a guy with a bunch of Titleist clubs. The appearance is very disappointing.

      Reply

      Tom

      5 years ago

      The marketing department must have been completely out of the loop with the design team??? Looks mean a lot when a customer walks into the golf equipment retail. Looks draw attention which leads to first up interest. Why would you start off in third place – This is not how retail works and like it or not Titleist is in the retail market

      Reply

      THOMAS

      5 years ago

      The marketing department must have been completely out of the loop with the design team??? Looks mean a lot when a customer walks into the golf equipment retail. Looks draw attention which leads to first up interest. Why would you start off in third place – This is not how retail works and like it or not Titleist is in the retail market

      Reply

      Brian

      5 years ago

      While I agree with the sentiment that looks (on the back of the club) don’t impact performance, I empathize with those who care about the appearance of their clubs – if you’re spending over 1K hard-earned dollars on a set of sticks, you are permitted to want some that fit your eyes.

      Imagine buying an expensive, hideous painting or print for a room in your house that expert interior designers say “brings the room together.” You don’t care that it makes your room feel warmer, cooler, or whatever; you won’t get over how ugly that painting is you spent some heavy coin on.

      Reply

      Nick Aquilino

      5 years ago

      Don’t know why so many talk about looks. When an iron is in a correct address position all that the golfer can see is the top line and the face and most irons look essentially the same. It would be interesting to do a test to see how many golfers could identify the iron brand if they only saw the club in an address position. . As a few have said what only matters is performance and that will vary widely from golfer to golfer.and have little to do with looks.
      Fitting and the correct shaft counts much more than the design of the rear of the club head.
      As a final comment, I would be willing to play irons that had high performance structures no matter how (ugly) it looked.

      Reply

      Grk

      5 years ago

      Funny how many ” golfers ” talk looks and not performance. They will be the ones calling them awesome it they could save strokes with a tin can on a stick.

      Reply

      NH Golfer

      5 years ago

      Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Wake me up for next generation in two more years.

      Reply

      Doug

      5 years ago

      As a die-hard Titleist loyalist for the past 10+ years (full bag), I’m a little disappointed. I was expecting/hoping the new T200s would look better than the AP3 718s, but in my opinion, they do not. My only hope left is that they perform markedly better.

      Knowing that new irons were going to be released later this year (and hearing through the grapevine that all new Titleist irons would carry a new nomenclature as well), I was really looking forward to replacing my AP2/AP3 combo set with all T200s at the end of the year. I am finally facing the fact that it’s time for a little more forgiveness now that I’m firmly into my 60s. I have played and continually updated my AP2s since their inception, adding three AP3 longer irons last year. The AP3s looked so much like the AP2s at address that I hardly noticed the difference, except for the added 10-15 yards of extra distance with the AP3s, even when missing the sweetspot. I was still was able to work them though. So, I finally decided to bite the bullet and switch over to ALL T200s when they come out, that is, until I saw what they look like.

      I may have to just go buy a few AP3 718s in PW, 9i, 8i and 7i to match up with my existing AP3 718 6i, 5i and 4i and then wait a couple more years until Titleist fixes the gimmicky look (which is so UN-like Titleist) in the next generation of the T200 (which will probably be called T222).

      At this point, based purely on the pictures, I can only hope they look better in real life and are miles ahead of the AP3 718s when I hit them in a fitting.

      BTW, the short irons (PW-8) in the T200 do not look as bad as the 7i-4i. That fired shell casing end to the toe side of the sweetspot is not on the short irons. Evidently we’ll hear more about the different technology between the short and longer irons in the coming weeks and months. Either way, unless when fitted I see a huge positive difference between the AP3s and the T200s, I may be playing AP3s for two more years.

      Reply

      Matt

      5 years ago

      I couldn’t agree more with you Doug. These things are not on brand for Titleist at all. I would grab the T200 in the short irons and get the AP3 from 7 down to fill that distance game. But judging by the sound of your game I feel that you shoot in the mid 70’s on the regular at a very tough course most likely due to your short game and course management. I can’t wait to see how these things perform for ya. I wish ya the best of luck in your journey with Titleist as the 7i down don’t fit my eye at all

      Reply

      Frank D.

      5 years ago

      I would be interested in trying these new Titleist. I play about 100 rounds a year and I have a 3 year old set of apex irons that I would love to replace, but they have an unblemished sweet spot that I’ve yet to hit with a ball, so I’m gonna have to wait a few more years…

      Reply

      Stephen

      5 years ago

      Does anyone else see the strong influence of the CNCPT irons on this design? I think it’s most pronounced with the T200.

      Reply

      Christopher

      5 years ago

      It’s only natural. It’s like a concept car’s design features trickling down to production models.

      Reply

      gunmetal

      5 years ago

      “…and while there’s always an element of pay for play in tour counts, it’s an impressive level of domination”

      Maybe the understatement of the year. Generally speaking, pay for play is THE driving element in tour counts. Every once in a while there is an outlier (Adams Hybrid, Tour Edge something, etc) but generally speaking straight cash talks.

      Reply

      Nick V

      5 years ago

      I am a brand loyalist and I think the line up looks impressive…. can’t wait to see them on a fitting. Going to be hard to get my 718 SP2’s out of my hands….. best iron I have ever played and I have played a LOT of irons. Anyway…..love the content as always boys…keep up the great work

      Reply

      Aaron M

      5 years ago

      Who cares what they look like? The whole reason we read MGS is to get real performance data. Looks are great to impress your friends with but taking their money with them is better.

      I’d rather play Millennium Falcon clubs–“they may not look like much but they’ve got it where it counts.”

      Reply

      Mark M

      5 years ago

      All I can say is WOW. I thought the T100 looked too busy before I saw the T200/T300. I know my opinion means squat but I wouldn’t touch those irons with a ten foot pole. FUGLY!

      Reply

      Joe

      5 years ago

      People like you who can’t hit spend their time worrying about looks. :-)

      Reply

      Paul

      5 years ago

      Exactly

      TenBuck

      5 years ago

      I’m thinking that those are cut-away models, can’t see them like that like a finished product.

      Reply

      Robert

      5 years ago

      Interesting. The MI is more toe side. Maybe they found putting the weight toe side still gives good solid center hits, but improves the forgiveness on the toe hits. It’ll be interesting to see where the actual CG is on the irons.

      Reply

      Steve S

      5 years ago

      Most folks are commenting about looks. I must be an outlier because looks are not important to me. Performance is what counts for me. Ping “eye 2’s” were some of the ugliest clubs ever made(IMO) but, at the time, the best performing irons I ever hit.

      Reply

      TDog

      5 years ago

      Don’t forget the Zing 2’s!!

      Reply

      shortside

      5 years ago

      A step closer to a TM (Good or bad thing in the eye of the beholder) while retaining some Titleist dignity. If you want classic try the Wilson Staff Blades (God they’re gorgeous).

      Reply

      Jim

      5 years ago

      I sure hope they do a lot of demo days because I have never been a fan of Titleist irons from the perspective of being forgiving. I am a 7 handicap and just can not find a Titleist iron that fits my game. I’m sure it just me , but Srixon irons have worked out great for me.

      Reply

      Lee

      5 years ago

      You and me both Jim, AP3’s the worst change I’ve ever made I’m back home at Mizuno (JPX919 forged) all is well in my golfing world.

      Reply

      BodineJCS

      5 years ago

      Yeh I agree … the ap2s are crap too … No thanks to titleist irons

      HDTVMAN

      5 years ago

      Very impressed and look great!

      Reply

      Johnny Penso

      5 years ago

      Guaranteed that little strip of metal connecting the cavity back with the back of the face gives you a minimum of 15 extra yards on your 26 degree 7 iron at 4200 rpm.

      Reply

      Bill

      5 years ago

      The T100 has the clean styling that appeals to my eye, similar to Mizuno irons (that’s a good thing!).
      Titleist market share is reflective of it’s pricing.
      Great product, but I want value also . The market offers plenty of well designed premium irons for a lot less.

      Reply

      SP

      5 years ago

      That is awesome! Now instead of ending up in the back bunker, you will air-mail the back bunker, hit the down slope and go out of bounds 50 yards past you intended target. I recently switch from a so-called “distance players iron” back to to and iron that was all about control. Wow what a difference. I got sucked in like many about hitting my #7 iron 180 yards and thought I had found the fountain of youth. With the new irons my distance control has come back, game has never been better and I couldn’t give a crap if I’m hitting a 5 or 6 iron into a green instead of the 7. Now find me a driver that goes 15+ yards……..I think I still may listen to that!

      Reply

      Bill V

      5 years ago

      If you can’t control your distance the problem is not the club, it is the operator!!! LOL

      YanniThe Greek

      5 years ago

      I’ll just keep my AP3’s forever…Softest non-forged club I’ve ever played (and long).

      Reply

      Terry

      5 years ago

      Are you going to have them regrooved every 5 years?

      Reply

      golfraven

      5 years ago

      He means until they are dead as a dodo. I want to play my AP3 until I see a black fat spot on the sweetspot. That might take 5-10 years depending how many shitty balls I will hit on the range

      daviddvm

      5 years ago

      Nice article Tony!
      Hits home for me I’ll look forward to trying them out sometime in the future.

      Shot Tracking by Arccos Caddie            I’m Right Handed

      Titleist TS2 10.5* Driver, HZRDUS SMOKE 60g stiff Shaft        Sometimes use (Wilson/Staff 2019  D7 Driver UST Mamiya Helium stiff shaft)

      Titleist TS2 15* Fairway, HZRDUS SMOKE 70g stiff Shaft

      Titleist 816H1 19* , Fujikura Motore Speeder stiff shaft

      Titleist 816H1 23* , Fujikura Motore Speeder stiff shaft

      Titleist 816H1 27* Hybrid w/ Diamana Blue Board 70 HY Stiff Shaft ( trade this club out for 5 iron sometimes )

      Titleist AP1 5-PW KURO KAGE low balance iron graphite stiff shafts plus 0.5″, 1* upright

      Vokey TVD 52*M SM4 inscribed WILLEY   Aerotech Steelfiber i125 xflex plus 1″, 1* upright

      Vokey Spin Milled BV 56-11 c-c True Temper Wedge shaft

      Vokey TVD 60*M SM4 inscribed WILLEY   Aerotech Steelfiber i125 xflex plus 1″, 1* upright

      Golf Pride Tour Velvet midsize grips

      Scotty Cameron California Monterey 35″ putter, The Art of Putting Head Cover, Scotty Cameron Golf Matador Putter Grip Mid-size.

      Titleist ProV1x

      Callaway 15′ pocket ball retriever ( I use this too much! )

      All carried in my 2012 Titleist Staff Bag.

      I still own a set of Ping I 3 green dot irons 3-PW stiff steel shafts ( first set I was ever fit for).

      Reply

      Jim

      5 years ago

      First impressions are that they definitely read as Titliest irons in their quality and image. However beyond that I’m not really liking any of the offerings, especially the T300 which looks like it has a switch on the back. I guess we’ll wait and see but it’s not a good initial impression. The T100 looks similar to a CB variant and the T200 definitely looks similar to the AP3 but there’s something wrong with the T300. At least they’re aligning the numbering correctly this time though.

      Reply

      Josh

      5 years ago

      T300 #speedbridge

      Reply

      Terry

      5 years ago

      The T100 looks awesome while the T200 and T300 don’t look good to me.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 15, 2024
    We’re Witnessing Greatness With Scheffler’s Dominance
    Golf Accessories
    Apr 15, 2024
    Temu Finds: Saplize Putting Suite
    Partner Content
    Apr 15, 2024
    Five Hidden Gem UK and Ireland Golf Tours
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.