MyGolfSpy Labs: Is Your GPS Watch Costing You Distance?
Labs

MyGolfSpy Labs: Is Your GPS Watch Costing You Distance?

MyGolfSpy Labs: Is Your GPS Watch Costing You Distance?

Are You Losing Yards?

A few years ago, we heard about a test that Andrew Rice had performed to learn if wearing a watch could have an adverse impact on the golf swing. After the test published I immediately started to get calls.

CALLER: “Hey, have you seen THIS!  If not, DO NOT go play golf with a watch tomorrow. Seriously.”
GOLFSPY X: “Huh?  Who is this?  Why are you calling me at 4:00 AM? Just…give me the link.”
CALLER: Here.
GOLFSPY X: “Is this real?”
CALLER: silence…..
GOLFSPY X: “He hung up?  Allllrighty then…”

Yeah. We were curious.

If we repeated Andrew’s test with more testers, would it reveal the kind of information that would cause golfers to peel the skin from their wrists while trying to rip away distance-losing watches? 

There’s really only one way to find out.

Test Overview

We rounded-up a group of testers and hit the lab to find out if wearing a watch…and then wearing two watches could actually cost golfers swing speed and ultimately distance.

Test Equipment

  • Driver: Each tester’s gamer
  • Balls: Range (new)
  • GPS Watch: SkyCaddie Linx (61 Grams)

watch-2

The SkyCaddie Linx was chosen as the GPS watch. It weighs 61 grams, 18 grams more than my daily wear Swiss Army watch (affectionately known as my iAnalog).

The Linx case (18.10 millimeters) was also substantially thicker than the iAnalog (9.20 millimeters). Watches were worn on the left wrist as all golfers swung from the right side.

TESTING PROCEDURES:

  • Testers: 5 Golfers
  • Age Range:  25-65
  • 8 swings each w/no watch
  • 8 swings each with 1 watch
  • 8 swings each with 2 watches

* Participants didn’t know ahead of time what they would be testing.

Weather Conditions

  • Inside: Heated Studio
  • Outside: 26 Degrees, Snow, Wind

THE TEST:

DISTANCE WAS LOST (SORTA…KINDA)

Across the board with our 5 testers, average carry distance dropped approximately 3 yards when testers wore a single watch compared to no watch. With a second watch (for those who conduct banking in Zurich), golfers, on average, lost another 1.5 yards.  

1 Watch = 2.9 yards lost
2 Watches = 4.5 yards lost

At first glance, the results appear to show that wearing a watch has a negative impact on distance.   

AS MANY A POLICE OFFICER HAS TOLD ME, NOT SO FAST

Golfer 1 actually gained 3 yards (on average) while wearing the watch!

Huh?  What?

average-carry-distance-2

Golfer #1: put on the watch and went from approximately 244 yards carry to 247 yards carry. Plus, he achieved the same club head speed: 103.5 mph. This necessitated a deeper look at the numbers. While wearing the watch Golfer1 averaged 450 rpm less spin and his launch angle increased by .7° from 14.1 to 14.8 degrees.

We kept going.

Golfer #2: the only golfer who regularly wears a watch or magnetic bracelet while playing saw his average carry distance drop approximately 2.5 yards from 197.3 yards to 194.8 yards when he wore one watch. His swing speed also dropped by 2 mph while his average carry distance fell by another 4.5 yards. His swing speed dropped another 2 mph when he wore a second watch. He lost a total of 7 yards.

Golfer #3: a non-watch fan, his first eight golf shots without a watch were a model of consistency. He averaged approximately 232 yards carry, with no shots worse than 227 and none longer than 238. His swing speed average was 108.5 mph. When Golfer Three put on a watch, his average carry distance dropped 10 yards to 221. Only one ball traveled past the 230 mark. With two watches, his swing speed actually increased to 115.3 mph, but his lack of consistent ball striking still meant his average carry distance of 220 was below the results of not wearing a watch.

average-clubhead-speed-2

Golfer #4: wears a watch all the time – except when he plays golf. Bare-wristed, he averaged approximately 222 yards carry and a club speed of 105 mph. With one watch, Golfer 4 had a more consistent club speed and averaged 107.2 mph, but still lost more than 6 yards of carry distance. When the second watch was placed on his wrist, his swing speed average dropped back to 106 mph but he still lost nearly 3 yards from his average when watch-free.

Golfer #5: previously wore a magnetic bracelet and thought it helped his swing. He gained 3 yards when he put the watch on, going from an approximate 204-yard carry average to 207 yards – despite his club speed dropping nearly 1 mph. With one watch, Golfer Five’s only drive below 200-yards carry was still 196 yards. Four drives without the watch on failed to break 200 yards. When the second watch was added, he still only hit one drive that carried less than 200 yards.

The results are clear as mud.

THE DATA

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOU

Remember that guy that woke the owner of MGS up at 4 am and that test? Well, that likely scared more than a few golfers away from ever wearing a watch again, and early on in this test it scared the hell out of us too.

So why did some people lose as much as 10 yards and others carry it 3 yards farther? Consistency.

A quick look back into the numbers showed that all five golfers carry distance was less consistent while wearing one watch compared to wearing a watch. A number close to one would show the most consistency, while a larger number would represent more variability.

Sufficed to say we don’t have any definitive answers. Five people tested. Two actually gained distance while wearing a watch while the other three lost yardage, but not necessarily swing speed. How do we explain this?

  • Perhaps wearing a watch corrects certain swing flaws? Golfer #1 believed wearing the watch kept him from cupping his wrists at the top of his swing, his common swing flaw with the driver. Golfer #5 also thought the watch forced him to break his wrists properly.
  • Don’t be afraid to reconsider your position on wearing a watch. The only golfer who regularly wears a GPS watch to play had the most significant drop in yardage when wearing a watch.
  • Brace for impact. Finally, it is notable that two golfers had their carry distances drop but swing speeds increase while wearing the watch. Does wearing the watch, for some, make it will be more difficult to return the club head to its proper impact position?

The only certainty here is that wearing a watch…or two watches does appear to have some impact on the mechanics, and ultimately the speed of the golf swing.

So, what should you do?

Take heed of the popular cliché: Your actual results may vary.

The best advice is not to throw on a GPS watch and assume your game will improve because you know your distance to the middle of the green. Do what you would with any piece of equipment: get tested on a launch monitor and see what works for you.

For You

For You

Golf Wedges
Apr 16, 2024
Vokey WedgeWorks Low Bounce K Grind Wedge
News
Apr 16, 2024
It Was A Masters To Forget For LIV Golf
Golf Apparel
Apr 16, 2024
adidas Pioneers Next Generation of Lightweight Golf Garments
Jeff Fee

Jeff Fee

Jeff Fee

Jeff has spent 18 years working in the golf business, including four as a writer/editor at The Indianapolis Star and the past dozen in golf retail. He admits he looks like Al Czervik, shanks like Tin Cup and putts like Happy Gilmore. He resides just outside Indianapolis with his wife of nearly 20 years and their 13-year-old dog, Bogey, and is grateful for basketball during long Indiana winters.

Jeff Fee

Jeff Fee

Jeff Fee

Jeff Fee

Jeff Fee

Jeff Fee





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Brian K

      8 years ago

      I have never seen anybody wearing 2 watches. If there is, that person is just moron.
      This test is ,hmmm, BS.

      Reply

      Tom D

      8 years ago

      I only WISH my driver swing was so consistent that I could attribute a 1 or 2 MPH club head speed change to the presence of a watch on my arm. i wonder if I could pick up a few mphs by shaving the hair off my arms? Sorta like the Olympic swimmers who shave their legs to decrease resistance in the water.

      Reply

      King Cobra

      8 years ago

      Wearing a watch might lose or gain you yards ?

      Reminds of that great scene in Tin Cup when he’s on the range in the US open and can’t hit a thing until his caddie tells him to take all his change out of one pocket and put it in the other pocket , and then proceeds to smash everything straight out the middle .

      All in the mind .

      Reply

      Steven

      8 years ago

      Short Version: There isn’t a reliable difference between no watch and one watch or between one watch and two watches, but it looks like there may be a reliable difference between no watch and two watches. To be confident about any of this we would need a larger sample.

      Long Version: If you calculate the difference scores for how each golfer did in the different conditions (no watch – one watch, one watch – two watches, no watch – two watches) and then find the means and 95% confidence intervals for the difference scores, you get the following results.

      no watch – one watch = 2.65 yards [-4.76, 10.05]
      one watch – two watches = 1.09 [-6.73, 8.91]
      no watch – two watches = 3.74 [0.16, 7.31]

      In other words, wearing no watch was 2.65 yards longer than wearing one watch (on average), but it was a small sample with a lot of variability so the plausible values for the real difference between no watch and one watch is anywhere between being 4.76 yards shorter without a watch to being 10.05 yards longer without a watch. Because the confidence interval is so wide and includes zero we can’t be to sure of what is really going on with this one. The same can be said of the difference between one watch and two watches.

      The difference between wearing no watch and two watches is a more reliable difference. Wearing no watch was 3.74 yards longer than wearing two watches, on average. The sample is still small, but there is less variability so the plausible values for the real difference between no watch and two watches is anywhere between between being 0.16 yards longer without a watch to being 7.31 yards longer without a watch. The confidence interval is still wide, but it doesn’t include zero so it is possible that there is something going on with this one. To be confident of any of this would require a larger number of golfers.

      I can’t paste a figure here in the comments, but you can see the means and confidence intervals in this document: https://www.dropbox.com/s/3jfrljd60t953z2/Golf%20Watch%20Data%20Analysis.docx?dl=0 . If an administrator can add the image to my comments that would be great.

      Best,

      Steven

      Reply

      Manotee

      8 years ago

      As I read the article, I wondered about Bubba and his watch. Having Bubba do the test would be interesting, as he is primarily a feel player and removing the watch would seriously affect his feel and his swing. I bet the difference in accuracy some of your testers experienced was due to the different feel. Perhaps a lot of the results are more about the feel than the weight.

      However, I wonder about the effect of which wrist the watch is on, and what effect wearing it face towards the palm would make.

      So many variables. I always wear a watch, but may take it off next time I play.

      Reply

      Gisle Solhaug

      8 years ago

      Hi Manotee,

      What do you mean by “feel”? How would you define it?

      In my book feel is defined as the forces acting on your hands from the club. That has to do with the MOI and mass of the club, including the mass of the watch. So when you say feel, that would include the weight of the watch.
      Gisle

      Reply

      Sam Wilkinson

      8 years ago

      No, it isn’t.

      Reply

      John Ineson

      8 years ago

      Maybe if the watch costs considerably north of a quarter of a million, like Bubba’s, there’s no adverse impact. Of course, he wears it on his left wrist, even though he’s left handed and you’d think would be wearing it on his right wrist, so he’s like a right handed guy wearing his watch on his right wrist. Hey, I’m going right wrist. I’ll bet all that stuff about hitting it in the middle of the clubface as the most significant variable is all male bovine excrement! It’s where you were your watch!

      Reply

      Robin

      8 years ago

      Great article . I have a gps watch. I took it off my wrist and mount it up to my pull cart… For the time I now use an antique pocket watches instead of a wrist watch.
      I just dont like wearing a wrist watch when I’m golfing ,and plus a pocket watch is much more stylish than a Garmin.

      Reply

      Bob

      8 years ago

      I can hardly wait for the RocketWatch with turbulators. 17 more yards at least.

      Reply

      Gisle Solhaug

      8 years ago

      I will probably wait for the RocketWatch 2, it will be released 3 months later.

      Reply

      Scotez

      8 years ago

      I always wear a watch so I’m actually uncomfortable without it. I can also tell if. I am cupping my wrist. That being said, I guess I should look for a more aerodynamic watch to pick up a couple of feet.

      Reply

      Jake Fiacco

      8 years ago

      Just loop it on your bag

      Reply

      Iain Douglas

      8 years ago

      One thing I can’t do us wear a watch playing golf. Feels really uncomfortable for me.

      Reply

      Ken Zemalis

      8 years ago

      It’s not really costing you 10 yards you just know you are hitting it 10 yards less than you thought you were.

      Reply

      R Darr

      8 years ago

      B.S
      What about someone like myself who wears a watch on the right wrist……what’s that conclusion?.
      Wearing a watch must be like a counter balance at the end of the shaft assist in rotating the right foream

      Reply

      Regis

      8 years ago

      Might want to check your watch-at least the calendar bubble. April 1st is still more than 3 weeks away

      Reply

      Jim Thompson

      8 years ago

      Conclusion should be attach watch to golf bag thus getting accurate distance without weight on wrist.

      Reply

      Youhaveballs.com

      8 years ago

      {Amazing|Great|Awesome very informative

      Reply

      Dan

      8 years ago

      No

      Reply

      RL

      8 years ago

      I call BS… if my wrist stayed a constant diameter throughout the day I would keep my Bulova on while playing. BS b/c here: I am more accurate with a watch guiding my left side into impact. That alone would cut yards off of a hole while “losing” yards off the box with a straight yardage measurement.
      Wear a watch, take 1/2 club extra, hit it straighter, cut strokes!

      Reply

      Steve

      8 years ago

      Jeff must be bored……..”watches?…we don need no stinkin’ watches!”

      Reply

      Double Mocha Man

      8 years ago

      Would be interesting to perform similar tests with lead weights (5 lbs./10 lbs.) on your wrist or wrists. We’re talking momentum and mass here…

      Reply

      Gisle Solhaug

      8 years ago

      There is an optimum club weight for each golfer in order to maximize the energy created. When the weight is too high the hands will slow down too much and thereby reduce the energy created. The kinetic energy created is a function of mass and hand speed. Golfers with fast twitching muscles will create maximum energy with a lighter club (higher speed) than a golfer with slow twitching muscles. All adult golfers will increase clubhead speed by adding a small weight to the grip end of the club, or by wearing a watch. One also has to take into account that too heavy clubs will wear you out during a round of golf. Long drive champions use heavier clubs to create more energy and clubhead speed, they only have to hit 5 balls.

      Reply

      Carl C

      8 years ago

      Maybe this is a duh Sherlock comment, but the old physics equation, f=ma (force equals mass times acceleration) tells us that IF a golfer can accelerate his arm just as quickly through the ball while wearing a watch, the carry distance will be the same. If you could put the watch around your driver head and still swing as fast, the carry distance would increase dramatically, as the mass applying the same acceleration would result in a higher force applied to the ball. Otherwise, whether it’s a 300-pound football player playing a round of golf or a female 120-pound 14-year-old, same club with same speed will produce same distance. Like I said, may be being a master of the obvious but something to think about. Thanks for the article!

      Reply

      Gisle Solhaug

      8 years ago

      Hi Carl C,
      The more kinetic energy you can create in your downswing the more energy is transferred to the club which results in higher clubhead speed. Kinetic energy = 1/2 x mass x velocity squared. (which is derived from F=ma as you mention)

      Reply

      Bar

      8 years ago

      Anyone ever done a test as to how many yards you lose ( if any ) according to the age and condition of your ball.

      Reply

      Gisle Solhaug

      8 years ago

      Hi,
      When you add weight to your wrist, for example by wearing a watch, it is almost the same as adding weight to the grip end of the club. (Which will reduce your swingweight, just to prove a point that Swingweight is useless)
      The added weight will slow down your hands slightly. However, as the weight in motion is increased so is the energy created by your swing. This energy transfers into clubhead speed. Therefore, the swing speed increases when you wear a watch. This is the basis of the BioMatch method of matching golf clubs.
      The reason that the results for carry distance are muddy is that the added weight alters the angle of attack, which again alters launch angle and spin.
      Everything can be explained by physics.

      Reply

      Jon

      8 years ago

      Next time include Phil and Bubba in your watch study since they play every round with a watch.

      Reply

      Keith

      8 years ago

      They are both Lefthanded Golfers (excluded from the tests).
      I think your real question relates to whether wearing the Watch(es) on either wrist makes a difference?
      However, from the responses about kinetic energy: it would not seem to make any physical difference.
      Good question though, as I’m Lefthanded and adding all that weight to the lower wrist would imply a definite change to some part of the swing. Maybe not club head speed, but does it impact the dynamics of Kick point and flex point? Especially as all modern shafts have these important elements defined in their suitability for your swing!

      Reply

      Uhit

      8 years ago

      would be interesting to perform a similar test with different gloves…

      Reply

      Gisle Solhaug

      8 years ago

      I have seen gloves in the market were you can insert weights to increase your clubhead speed. It would, however, be much easier to have your clubs matched by the Biomatch method. That will increase accuracy as well.

      Reply

      Uhit

      8 years ago

      Hi Gisle, I have also the different friction (between grip and hand), and the different flexibility, that a different glove causes, in mind…

      …causing different grip pressure, different tension in your muscles etc…

      …it is not only just the weight, but also the feel, that influences the abilities of our body and muscles to create speed.

      Gisle Solhaug

      8 years ago

      Agree, but these are not related to the club. Only the mass and MOI of the club affects how it behaves when swung (ignoring air resistance).

      Uhit

      8 years ago

      No nitpicking intended, but if the grip is slippery, during the swing and / or at impact, the damping of the forces is different…
      …and the frequency of the club (including shaft) and the frequency of the swing, should match to add as constructive as possible at impact.
      So, there are at least those additional (club related) two things to take into account (…whilst still ignoring air resistance…).

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Wedges
    Apr 16, 2024
    Vokey WedgeWorks Low Bounce K Grind Wedge
    News
    Apr 16, 2024
    It Was A Masters To Forget For LIV Golf
    Golf Apparel
    Apr 16, 2024
    adidas Pioneers Next Generation of Lightweight Golf Garments
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.