Woods, Hybrids and Long Irons – What is the Best Combo of Golf Irons For You?
Labs

Woods, Hybrids and Long Irons – What is the Best Combo of Golf Irons For You?

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Woods, Hybrids and Long Irons – What is the Best Combo of Golf Irons For You?

Bag makeup is personal – there are no rules that say you have to carry a certain combination of clubs. The selection of 14 clubs is one of the few things over which golfers actually have total control. So how can amateur players make the most informed decisions?

Data.

Arccos users can look at individual club data and analyze their entire bag makeup to find weaknesses. With precise shot data available for every club, Arccos users can:

  • See how often they’re using each club
  • Know how it’s performing relative to the rest of their bag
  • Easily compare data between new clubs and old clubs when tinkering with a different setup

Our last data collaboration with Arccos pitted the 4-iron against the 4-hybrid. Using the Arccos database of 100+ million shots taken during 1.6+ million rounds, we expanded our analysis to include all long clubs: 3-wood, 5-wood, 2-hybrid, 3-hybrid, and 3-iron. The information below is grouped by handicap bracket. In each section, you’ll see how each club performs on average in five categories for golfers of different skill sets: drive shot distance, approach shot distance, fairway hit percentage, greens in regulation percentage and average score when using as tee club.

0-5 Handicap

With clubs ranging from 3-wood to 3-iron, even the best players in our study have trouble achieving the same distance totals on approach shots compared to tee shots. There’s a large gap for all five clubs. On approach shots, the 5-wood, 3-hybrid, and 3-iron all travel almost identical distances (~175 yards) for the players in this group, but off the tee, the 3-iron has a distinct advantage among those three clubs. The data also shows an increase in fairway hit percentage with the 3-iron when compared to the 5-wood and 3-hybrid. (Yes, there are people out there that actually can find the sweet spot on a 3-iron!) If you’re one of these better players, consider dusting off the 3-iron and putting it in the bag.

A 0-5 HCP: Distance chart, the helps prove the best combo of golf irons for you A 0-5 HCP: Accuracy Chart, the helps prove the best combo of golf irons for you A 0-5 HCP: Scoring, the helps prove the best combo of golf irons for you

6-10 Handicap

Players in the 6-10 handicap bracket show relatively minimal differences between tee and approach distances for both the 2 and 3-hybrids. Focusing on the 3-hybrid, it’s interesting that this club has the lowest fairway hit percentage for this group of players. Several comments in the 4-iron vs. 4-hybrid piece noted that as single-digit players, hybrids are often too easy to hook off the tee. That holds true here as the 3-hybrid sits five percentage points behind the 3-iron for fairways hit. This group features players who most likely are trying to break 80 more often – being smart about hybrid usage could make that goal a reality.

A 6-10 HCP: Distance, the helps prove the best combo of golf irons for you A 6-10 HCP: Accuracy chart, the helps prove the best combo of golf irons for you A 6-10 HCP Scoring Chart, the helps prove the best combo of golf irons for you

11-15 handicap

As with our previous group, this group also hits hybrids close to the same distance off the tee and on approach shots. For both the 2 and 3-hybrids, distance differences are only about three yards between tee shot and approach shots. The most significant gap between tee shots and approach shots is found with the 3-wood, while, not surprisingly, the 3-iron is the shortest club for approach shots overall.

Armed with this knowledge, golfers in this handicap bracket can focus on improving these shots during practice sessions or avoid them on the course. Overall, when you factor in distance and accuracy, the 2-hybrid is a solid play for this group. It has a steady fairway hit percentage combined with consistent distances off the tee and on approaches, with the added kicker of the lowest average score when used as a tee club.

An 11-15 HCP Distance Chart, the helps prove the best combo of golf irons for you An 11-15 HCP Accuracy Chart, the helps prove the best combo of golf irons for you An 11-15 HCP Scoring Chart, the helps prove the best combo of golf irons for you

16-20 Handicap

For the first time, this group sees several clubs with longer distances on approach shots compared to tee shots. The 2-hybrid and 3-hybrid gain five and six yards, respectively, on approaches. In general, the 2-hybrid through 3-iron clubs perform very similarly. For the most part, they are only separated by a few yards off the tee and a few percentage points for fairway percentage. This runs counter-intuitive to the thought that higher handicap players should ditch the 3-wood in favor of hybrids. As a fairway finder, the 3-wood is the clear champ.

A 16-20 HCP Distance Chart, the helps prove the best combo of golf irons for you A 16-20 HCP Accuracy Chart, the helps prove the best combo of golf irons for you

 

20+ handicap

For these players, the 2-hybrid and 3-hybrid gain about 5 and 9 yards on approaches compared with shots taken off the tee. For every other handicap bracket, the 3-wood is the clear winner in fairway hit percentage, but in the 20+ bracket, the 2-hybrid is close to surpassing the 3-wood. It only falls about 2.5% behind. For approach shots, the 2-hybrid travels one yard farther and hits the green about 2.5% more often.

A 20+ HCP Distanc Chart, the helps prove the best combo of golf irons for you A 20+ HCP Accuracy Chart, the helps prove the best combo of golf irons for you A 20+ HCP Scoring chart, the helps prove the best combo of golf irons for you

Actionable Insights

Finding the right bag makeup for your game is simple: The more you play with Arccos, the more data you have at your disposal, the more informed decisions you can make. The answer, as always, lies in the data.

Use the data we provide as well to get the most popular products for your game, even consider using our buyer’s guides to up your game the right way!

For You

For You

Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
Buyer's Guides
Apr 12, 2024
Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
First Look
Apr 12, 2024
Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
News
Apr 12, 2024
PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Our mission is #ConsumerFirst. We are here to help educate and empower golfers. We want you to get the most out of your money, time and performance. That means providing you with equipment reviews you can trust, as well as honest reporting on the latest issues affecting the game today. #PowerToThePlayer

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Driver Ping G30 Hybrids PXG 0317
3/4 IRON PXG 0311XF 5-GW Srixon Z 565
SW PXG 0317 LW PXG 0311
Putter EVNROLL  
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Jeroen Goudswaard

      3 years ago

      I was just checking my driving distance on Garmin (I am a hcp 15). With 93 mph driver swing speed, my average distance is 208, my 75 percentile (or expected) is 228 and my longest 5% are 249 on average. This is the average of some 40 rounds played, winter and summer. So the 0-5 hcp that only hits the 4-iron 170 could hit it 20% further on his best hit. Or 205. That would make sense.

      Reply

      Doug

      3 years ago

      Does Arccos have a P-Average distance (something like a 75th percentile distance, eliminating mis-hits and outliers) like Shot Scope? If not and these are average #’s then as a Shot Scope user, there is a lot of ‘noise’ in the numbers above. The P-Avg distance is truly useful on the course as one’s true club distance, and it helps to track seasonally here in California..

      Reply

      James

      3 years ago

      These numbers are bullshit. There’s no such thing as a scratch golfer that hits their 5 wood only 175 yards and no body hit their hybrid farther than a 5 woods

      Reply

      Gaynor

      3 years ago

      James, I am a 24 handicapper and do just that. Not sure how many 20+ you play with, but most that I know struggle with fairway woods. We’re beginners.

      Reply

      Jorge

      3 years ago

      You’re right about the numbers that they do seem odd. FYI, someone’s handicap number might be more to do with horrible putting, hence someone who 4-5 putts might be bombing their drives like a scratch golfer. I think the analysis done here should be more linked to measurable distances that a golfer can observe from field markers at the driving range.

      Reply

      Longjohn

      4 years ago

      I don’t believe that more than 10% of 20 handicappers can even hit a 2 hybrid….most two hybrids are 16-18 degrees I think. I don’t think they can get them off the ground!

      Reply

      John Bush

      3 years ago

      I have no problem elevating the ball, just can’t stop hooking it out of bounds. So, there goes your assessment!! I’m a 22hcp

      But I keep an honest score too

      Reply

      Travis

      5 years ago

      I’m a +2.5 and have never in my life played with a 0-5 handicapper who can only hit their 4-iron 170y…

      Reply

      KC

      5 years ago

      This doesn’t appear to take lie into consideration. It may very well be that the 3 iron worked better than a hybrid because the lie and the shot angle were very inviting and allowed for a 3 iron. Conversely, it may be that the hybrids were used when the lie was terrible, which would skew the results (at least for GIR stats).

      Reply

      Ernest Poirier

      6 years ago

      As a “Golf Statistic Tracker” user (albeit not Arccos), be warned, that all shots are not treated equal. Shot Tracking products do not take into consideration wind, nor elevation changes. With that in mind, I make my club selections based on distances obtained in a simulator with the wind turned off.

      Reply

      Ernest Poirier

      6 years ago

      p.s. My Golf Spy, thank you for confirming my fear about Hybrids off the tee. I am shocked at the number of times my fade, turned into an “Out of Bounds” hook, just because I’m using my 3hybrid

      Reply

      Bwpage3

      6 years ago

      I use a Touredge HL3 #2 Ironwood off the tee on tight fairways and I can hit it as long as any of the 3 woods I own (all shortened 1″ and re-swingweighted accordingly). I can hit this TE HL3 #2 straight as an arrow, never failing to find the center of the fairway or the par 3 greens. I don’t use it for approach shots as I have a Big Bertha Fusion 7 Wood (-1″) that can get me the rest of the way to the cup.

      Reply

      Dan

      6 years ago

      Interesting. I’m in the first group. I own a 3w, 5w, 3h, and a 3i. Admittedly, the 3i is a graphite shafted Hybrid style but it’s tagged in Arccos as 3i. I use all of these clubs frequently and for very different purposes. They have very different ball flights and very different carry/roll distances. Rarely would more than two be in my bag at any given time. Data without context isn’t very helpful.

      Reply

      scott

      6 years ago

      I’m one of those 6-10 group but I don’t have a 3 wood or a 2/3 Hybrid 3/4/5 iron. What’s in my bag is a 17*loft 5 wood 210.. yards 20*loft 7 Heavenwood wood 195 and a 24*loft 9 wood 180 yards all are Callaway BB. Different strokes for different folks. With my swing speed fairway woods might be old school but I’m also old

      Reply

      Bob

      6 years ago

      Great article! This clearly demonstrates knowing what clubs, distances and club accuracy you need to have in your bag.
      Fairway woods , hybrids or long irons , what works best for your game.

      Reply

      mackdaddy

      6 years ago

      Ok so tracking shots thru Arrcos or old fashioned pencil and pad (now very accurate when paired with a range finder) we can/should know which clubs to put in our bags. I have worked very hard on this for years and finally looked at my irons gapping of 4 degrees and continued that theme above and below the irons. My gaps are about 12 yards and I can choke down one wrap on my Winn Dri Tec wraps grips and trim 6 yards. I play the 3 and 4 hybrids because I find my miss hits go much longer than if I hit a 3 or 4 iron off the toe. I love my KZG irons but they are not very forgiving on mishits. I carry a 16.5 degree wood but that is the only club not at 4 degrees and I am shopping for a 15 degree three wood to fill that spot. Knowing how farr I hit each club is the key to my game, I may be left or right but I will be pin high most of the time. That is so empowering over the ball and creates a much more relaxed stroke.

      Reply

      HardcoreLooper

      6 years ago

      So the 3 wood appears to be the longest and most accurate club off the tee, but yet it seems to lead to the worst outcomes with respect to scoring. I wonder if:

      1. Players are using the 3 wood more on longer holes and less on shorter holes.

      2. The shorter holes tend to have tighter fairways (leading to more missed fairways with shorter tee clubs), but the misses with shorter tee clubs are staying in play, leading to legitimate approach shots.

      The fairways hit number is interesting, but I’d be really interested to see the side-to-side dispersion number.

      For the record, Arccos says I hit the fairway 49.1% of the time with a 3 wood and 58.8% of the time with a 4 iron (I don’t carry a 3 iron). And the 3 wood is 31 yards longer comparing Smart Distance for both.

      My 3 hybrid only hits the fairway 40% of the time and is 10 yards longer than the 4 iron. I’ve basically given up on it.

      Reply

      Brad

      6 years ago

      The data is interesting, but there is a general problem in analysing data based on handicap…

      Firstly, there are many 20+ handicappers who can hit the ball as far or further than the “average” 0-5 handicapper shown in this analysis. Some of those high handicappers can also hit their 3 iron much better than a 5 wood or hybrid, and some can hit a hybrid further and more accurate than a 5 wood or iron. Secondly, there are many 0-5 handicappers who hit it the distances shown for 20+ handicappers, but are consistent, dead accurate and have excellent short games. These players are generally experienced, but older players, women or juniors.. Although these players may be able to hit a 3 iron just fine, they can’t afford to give up any distance so may use a 5 wood or 3 wood most of the time for those shots.

      That is the general problem with aggregating data, it can often make the analysis of that data quite misleading. Perhaps if it were broken up not only into handicap, but age or gender it might be more relevant. As it is, this data merely catches the readers attention, but leaves them with nothing much substantial for their own game than the need for them to collect their own data on their golf game and make some rational decisions about the clubs they have in the bag.

      Folks, please don’t go and ditch your 5 wood in favour of a 2 hybrid or vice versa just based on the data in this article – you might find you can’t hit the 5 wood or 2 hybrid worth a darn if you do…but do collect your own data so you can make the right decisions.

      Reply

      Brandon

      6 years ago

      All the distances seem pretty short to me. In my experience penalty strokes and poor short games are what lead to high handicaps, much more so than the few times a round where one needs to hit a long iron or a similar club.

      Reply

      Jay

      6 years ago

      I think the distances are spot on. The distance is based on averages, which include good and bad shots. There’s no formula to remove outliners here, so the data is more real and truthful (which is the biggest arguement against launch monitor testing).

      I agree with Brad about some players being able to get more distance out of clubs than there handicap suggest. When you tack on the strokes gained system you can better evaluate your game. For example, let say you are that 20 handicaper that hits his 3w as far as a 0-5 handicap. Well if that is the case, you don’t need to practice with the 3w as much and you can better focus your practice on other areas.

      With your own data you can see where you stack up with your long clubs and see what is maybe a better fit. Ignore putting yourself into your actual handicap bracket, instead where does your data suggest your handicap is. That is really where the value is at in this article.

      If your data doesn’t match your actual handicap that means you are either better or worse than your handicap in that area of play, and you can use this to see where you are actually at.

      Brent

      6 years ago

      I think the distances are pretty spot on, and statistically they are. I’ve been teaching for 17 years and one thing I am sure of is the majority golfers drastically over estimate their distances.

      Will

      6 years ago

      Breakdown is informative; probably most amateur golfers don’t need a 1, 2 or 3 iron, unless they are a low handicapper & playing a lot. Personally, I like the idea of hooding a 4 iron from a trouble lie & running it up on the green, thinking that’s a shot all of us should learn to play; that’s why I don’t carry any hybrids… I prefer to use fairway woods or irons, which you can always choke up on, or hit it a little harder. For me that works , for someone else, perhaps the opposite – that’s golf…

      Reply

      Waazzupppp

      6 years ago

      Interesting look at things. I play to a 3 handicap right now and just dumped my bladed 1-3-4 irons in favor of softer landing hybrids last winter. The 17° is amazing off the tee – the 20° is perfect from the fairway and the 23° looks nice in the bag next to them. I’m pretty well set from 225 in now and can take the 17° about 265 off the tee. Not a bad deal for me. I think the lesson here though is to do your homework before you buy anything that may help you game.

      Reply

      Danilo Policarpio

      6 years ago

      Great write up! I think it would be interesting too for a breakdown of handicap, accuracy, distance and scoring for 3 wood vs 4 wood.

      Reply

      Ray

      6 years ago

      I cannot truly understand the big argument over technology and how much it has helped golfers. According to this data, someone that typically scores in the low 90’s hits their 3 iron 129.2 yards? I play a lot, and I have never seen anyone that is consistently in the low 90s hit that short. Further, this means the average golfer would have only hit a 3 iron 110 yards before the advancement of technology? I know par 3’s have always been over 130 yards on average. Does this mean every 20 handicap golfer hit 3 wood or driver into par 3s?

      I’m sorry, but something doesn’t make sense….

      Reply

      Chase

      6 years ago

      I too was struck by this, but I’m assuming they did not filter out the duffs / mishits, etc. that could easily drag the average down significantly. As with most of these analyses, they raise as many questions as they answer. My hypothesis is that the full distribution for shots among high handicappers is pretty bi-modal with a mass of shots around 170 – 180 yards (good hits) and a mass of shots around 40 – 60 yards (duffs, shanks, etc). Depending on how those two shot clusters mix could easily give you a 130 yard average. Showing box plots, histograms, or densities of the shot data would answer this empirically, but that’s my .02.

      Reply

      Jay

      6 years ago

      I think what doesn’t make sense is how you are trying to tie distance into things. I’m going to go on a limb and say that the distances you see are averages, not typicals, and it does include all bad shots. So based on that, yes I fully believe the average distance is accurate. The higher the handicap the more clear it is that there is a struggle with long clubs in general, not just irons.

      Now if you were to throw in typical yardage the picture would look different. I think Accros calculates typical yardage by taking the top and bottom 5% of the shots out of the equation, which should give you what you “should” expect to see.

      I use gamegolf, and the stats show the same thing. Every game I get an average distance and a typical distance. Last game my average driving distance was 232, with my shortest being 195. A week before that my average was 212 with my shortest being 150. However; my typical yards for both weeks stayed at 235. With that information I can tell I had a bad week of drives, and a really damn good week of drives.

      Going back to your point on distance, hopefully that clears up why the distance looks the way it does.

      Reply

      Steve

      6 years ago

      Thanks for this. I found it rather interesting.

      One question that came to mind, though, given the performance of the 3wood off the tee, is the 3wood better than the driver? (I do not recall seeing that test, and did not find one through Professor Google.)

      Reply

      Rene

      6 years ago

      It is if you aren’t hitting your driver correctly. The driver should be going further on carry and total distance.

      Reply

      DaveMac

      6 years ago

      Interesting!
      How does arcoss differentiate a lay up vs a deliberate attempt to hit the green? The GIR %’s above are only from shots were the player attempted to hit the green?
      The GIR % seems low for all categories, I record my stats manually on an old software program and my GIR %’s are better than the 0-5 handicap group, which surprises me because I always felt my GIR numbers to be poor.
      Bag make up is determined by swing speed (ball speed) plus player preference.

      Reply

      Patrick Petrie

      6 years ago

      Unfortunately it doesn’t. Same goes for punch shots used with the clubs and all that. So your 50 yard shot to get back into the fairway with the 3 iron or wood goes against your average club distance.

      Reply

      HardcoreLooper

      6 years ago

      If they’re using Arccos data, they *should* be using Smart Distance (which omits both long and short outliers) and not average distance. That should filter out the punch shots from trouble.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
    Buyer's Guides
    Apr 12, 2024
    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
    First Look
    Apr 12, 2024
    Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
    News
    Apr 12, 2024
    PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.