INDEPENDENT & UNBIASED
All products featured on MyGolfSpy are independently selected and tested by our staff. However, when you buy something through our retail links, we may earn an affiliate commission.
12
Products
Considered
240
Hours
Researched
11,520
Shots
Hit
64.9m
Readers
Our Job is Your Game
The results of the 2021 Most Wanted Player’s Iron Test are in!
At MyGolfSpy, our job is to provide independent, unbiased and objective testing so you can make more confident purchasing decisions. Our 2021 Most Wanted Player’s Iron Test is an indispensable guide for the off-the-rack buyer or for anyone looking for insight before their next fitting.
Player’s irons feed golfers’ egos. Although these irons can possess phenomenal aesthetics, they can be equally punishing in their performance if your game is lacking. But if you are a scratch to low-digit handicap golfer, you fall into the target market.
2021 Most Wanted Player’s Iron: Callaway Apex Pro
In data we trust. This statement holds especially true when it comes to the performance of the Callaway Apex Pro. With a 0.1542 Strokes Gained, it took the 2021 Best Player’s Iron crown. Its Strokes Gained score is 0.081 better than the runner-up. Quite the accomplishment. Here are the noteworthy data points:
- 1st in Strokes Gained
- 1st in Forgiveness
- 8th in Total Distance
Based strictly on performance, the Apex Pro is worthy of your consideration as a must try in the Player’s Iron category.
Performance Grades
Below is the 2021 Most Wanted Player’s Iron Test broken down by performance grades for each iron length. The percentages displayed for each iron represent the frequency at which each was among the best-performing irons for each tester across the test pool.
Iron Buying Considerations
Performance should be your primary concern when buying new irons but there are some additional things you may want to think about before you make your decision.
SET MAKE-UP
It’s essential to pay attention to set make-up. As with most things in the golf equipment industry, there is no universal standard for set composition. That’s not a bad thing as it allows for almost endless combinations and the ability to mix and match between models when appropriate. In the Player’s Iron category, 3-iron through pitching wedge is the common set make-up. However, there are some manufacturers who do not offer a 3-iron. Thus, 4-iron through pitching wedge and, in some cases, gap wedge are available as set make-ups. More and more OEMs are offering blended sets which you could use to your advantage when building your next set.
SHAFT SELECTION
The number of shaft options for irons is growing. It can be challenging to navigate the different models, weights and flexes to find the right shaft for you. The answer as to which is the best-performing shaft question stretches well beyond steel versus graphite.
Go through a professional fitting. If for some reason you can’t, the Mizuno Shaft Optimizer isn’t a bad place to start. The optimizer utilizes gyroscopes and strain gauges to measure things like club speed, tempo and how much the shaft is flexing at impact. It then recommends a list of shafts for your swing. It even makes a lie angle recommendation.
DISTANCE VERSUS FORGIVENESS
For the realist, distance is an afterthought in the Player’s Iron category. However, there are some noteworthy distance performers. Titleist CNCPT CP-02, PXG 0311 T Gen4, Srixon ZX7 and Sub 70 TAIII all display distance potential.
As well, forgiveness can be difficult to obtain in the Player’s Iron category. That said, Callaway Apex Pro, TaylorMade P7MC and Callaway X Forged CB all produced the best forgiveness numbers.
This category is notorious for lacking distance and forgiveness. So take these results for distance and forgiveness with a grain of salt.
COST
Player’s Irons are a premium in the golf industry. Therefore, cost is a tremendous factor when considering a new set. At $500 per club, Titleist CNCPT CP-02 is pricey. PXG’s 0311 T Gen4 also boasts a premium cost ($1,925 for a seven-piece set). Aside from these two, a set of seven will run you $1,200 to $1,400. Sub 70’s TAIII and New Level’s PF-2 represent exceptional value at, respectively, $990 and $875 for seven-piece sets. Aesthetics usually play a huge role in the cost of Player’s Irons. Rest assured that craftsmanship is central to your next Player’s Iron purchase.
BEST DISTANCE - TITLEIST CNCPT CP-02
The concept of distance is uncommon with Players Irons. However, the Titleist CNCPT CP-02 brings distance to the forefront. Boasting a sleek design, this beauty packs a punch in the distance department. Check it out.
FIELD NOTES
During each test, we look for trends that provide us with insight into where the market as a whole is moving as well as what noteworthy changes manufacturers have made to improve year-to-year performance. Additionally, we solicit feedback from our testers. We want to understand what they liked, what they didn’t like and why. Although we obtain their feedback, their subjective opinions do not influence, dictate or determine our testing rankings.
Trends and Tweaks
- In this year’s test, the presence of tungsten is strong. The primary goal of tungsten is to optimize the center of gravity placement and provide stability on off-center strikes. Several of the irons feature tungsten to some degree: Cobra KING Tour, Srixon ZX7, Callaway’s Apex Pro, X Forged CB, Wilson Staff Model CB, Titleist CNCPT CP-02 and Sub 70 TAIII.
- For the first time, Callaway implemented their Flash Face Cup design into the Apex Pro. Their A.I. Technology provides uniqueness to each individual iron for faster ball speeds and enhanced spin.
- Metal Injection Molding “MIM” made its appearance this year. Cobra’s “MIM” technology is the first of its kind and is utilized as a forging and casting replacement.
BEST FORGIVENESS - CALLAWAY APEX PRO
Throughout testing, Callaway Apex Pro performed outstandingly. Not only is it the 2021 Best Players Iron, it is the best for forgiveness as well. From its best shots to its worst shots, it proved to be the most consistent players iron.
Notes From The Testing Pool
The following section details subjective feedback from our pool of 20 testers. Gathering feedback is an important aspect of any test. We use their feedback as a representation of what golfers like and dislike about the product we test. That being said, the feedback is strictly subjective. It does not play a factor in the rankings.
- In the Player’s Iron category, looks and feel dominate the feedback discussions. Srixon ZX7, PXG 0311 T Gen4, Titleist 620 CB, TaylorMade P7MC and Callaway Apex Pro were all standouts in the looks department. For feel, Cobra KING Tour, Srixon ZX7, Mizuno JPX 921 Tour, Callaway X Forged CB and TaylorMade P7MC were outstanding performers.
- Titleist CNCPT CP-02 caught the attention of testers from the beginning for its looks. However, in terms of feel, there were plenty of testers who described the feel as “clicky” or harsh.
- Both direct-to-consumer products, Sub 70 TAIII and New Level PF-2 impressed testers. With Sub 70 TAIII, testers noted the looks were great but intimidating and it possessed tremendous feel. For New Level PF-2, a clean, pleasing look captured testers’ attention.
- Shiny chrome aesthetics were not in favor. Cobra KING Tour and Wilson Staff Model CB both received poor feedback for their shiny finishes.
2021 Most Wanted Player’s Iron Data
To filter and compare by club, use the drop-down list and checkboxes to select the irons you wish to compare.
It is important to note that while comparing the performance averages of 20 golfers with varying swing speeds and characteristics is interesting and sometimes useful, it doesn’t tell the complete performance story. For this reason, we look at performance on a per-golfer basis. The overall rankings (listed near the top of this story) reflected the rate at which a club finished in the Top Performing Group for each tester.
Use the dropdown below to switch between long, mid- and short irons. Mobile users can use their finger to scroll through the chart vertically and horizontally.
Expert Tip - Shaft Weight
Heavier steel shafts tend to produce lower launch angles with less spin. Lighter shafts (steel or graphite) tend to produce mid to high launch with more spin. Finding a shaft that matches your swing will help produce the desired launch conditions, and shot shape. Remember to keep an open mind and pay close attention to the shaft's influence on performance during your next fitting.
2021 Most Wanted Player’s Iron Product Specifications
2021 Most Wanted Players Iron Product Specs
Product | PW Loft | PW Length | 7 Iron Loft | 7 Iron Length | 5 Iron Loft | 5 Iron Length | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Callaway Apex Pro Check Price | 45.25 | 35.50 | 33.25 | 36.75 | 25.50 | 37.625 | |
Callaway X Forged CB Check Price | 44.75 | 35.50 | 32.50 | 36.75 | 25.50 | 37.75 | |
Cobra KING Tour Check Price | 44.75 | 35.75 | 32.50 | 37.00 | 25.50 | 38.25 | |
Mizuno JPX 921 Tour Check Price | 45.50 | 35.50 | 33.50 | 37.00 | 26.50 | 38.00 | |
New Level PF-2 Check Price | 44.75 | 35.625 | 32.75 | 36.875 | 25.50 | 38.00 | |
PXG 0311 T Gen4 Check Price | 45.50 | 35.50 | 31.50 | 36.75 | 25.25 | 38.00 | |
Srixon ZX7 Check Price | 45.50 | 35.50 | 31.25 | 37.00 | 24.50 | 38.00 | |
Sub 70 TAIII Check Price | 45.50 | 35.50 | 31.25 | 37.00 | 24.75 | 38.00 | |
TaylorMade P7MC Check Price | 46.50 | 35.50 | 34.50 | 36.75 | 26.50 | 37.75 | |
Titleist 620 CB Check Price | 46.75 | 35.50 | 34.50 | 36.75 | 26.50 | 37.75 | |
Titleist CNCPT CP-02 Check Price | 43.50 | 35.50 | 31.75 | 36.75 | 26.25 | 37.75 | |
Wilson Staff Model CB Check Price | 45.75 | 35.375 | 33.25 | 37.00 | 26.25 | 38.00 |
2021 Most Wanted Player’s Iron – FAQ
BUYING NEW IRONS
Q: How often should I buy new irons?
A: While on rare occasions there are quantifiable year-over-year breakthroughs, typically it takes three to five years for manufacturers to make significant performance gains. With the USGA further tightening restrictions on manufacturers, it’s possible, even likely, that it will take longer still moving forward. Our recommendation is to buy new irons only when they appreciably outperform what is already in your bag. Of course, if you want new irons because you want new irons, that’s fine, too.
Q: How do I determine the right category of irons for me?
A: The four categories of irons we test are Player’s (cavity backs), Player’s Distance, Game Improvement and Super Game Improvement. While there is some overlap between categories, your search should begin with an honest assessment of your skill level (handicap) as well as what you need in your game. While there are always exceptions, if your handicap is above 10 and ball striking is not a legitimate strength, consider Game Improvement or Super Game Improvement. For more skilled players who hit the ball more consistently, a set of Player’s or Player’s Distance irons may benefit your game the most. For those on the bubble, especially for those seeking a few more yards, the Player’s Distance category could be ideal.
Q: Does the shaft matter?
A: Absolutely. While changes to spin and launch differences are rarely massive, shaft changes frequently lead to improved accuracy, tighter dispersion and greater overall consistency.
Q: What should I look for when testing irons?
A: While golfers have been conditioned to consider distance to the exclusion of nearly everything else, even within the Player’s Iron category, we recommend looking at the little numbers and looking for small circles. When comparing metrics like distance and ball speed, be sure to look at your standard deviations (the small numbers usually found under the big ones on the launch monitor data screen). Smaller numbers mean better consistency which will usually mean more than an extra yard or two on the golf course. Similarly, look for tighter dispersion ellipses (small circles). We can’t overstate the importance of consistency with irons.
MOST WANTED
Q: How are the irons in the test fitted to each golfer?
A: We use a fitting process that we call fit from stock. Irons are fitted to each tester using the stock, no up-charge options from each manufacturer. We test one short iron, one mid iron and one long iron from each set. While there are no irons in our testing that feature adjustability, we fit to flex for each tester in the pool. Occasionally, manufacturers will send multiple sets with different stock shafts that we can utilize to improve launch conditions.
Q: How do you determine in which category to test a given set of irons?
A: To ensure that we’re testing irons as alike as designers allow for, in addition to the design of the head itself (profile, sole width, etc.), we sort by length and loft. Our goal is to keep differences as minimal as possible within any test cohort. When an iron reasonably fits in more than one category, we defer to the manufacturer’s category choice.
Q: How is the 2021 Most Wanted Player’s Iron Determined?
A: To determine our rankings, we collect key performance metrics with Foresight GCQuad Launch Monitors. After eliminating outliers, we utilize a proprietary methodology to calculate Strokes Gained values for each combination of tester and golf club. The iron that produces the highest Strokes Gained values relative to the field average is our Most Wanted.
Q: How is the “longest” iron determined?
A: The process to determine the longest Player’s Iron is similar to how we arrive at our overall rankings. For distance, our critical metric is Total Yards. We identify the iron that produced the most total yards with the long and middle irons relative to the field average.
Q: How is the “Most Forgiving” iron determined?
A: We’ve taken a practical approach to forgiveness. The club for which Strokes Gained values for the best shots are closest to the Strokes Gained value for the worst shots (relative to the field average) is the Most Forgiving.
Q: You discuss subjective feedback for things like looks, sound and feel. How much do those ratings factor into your rankings?
A: ZERO. Our rankings are based purely on launch monitor data and quantifiable performance metrics.
*We may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site.
Gerry L
7 months agoThe Callway apex pro 2021 irons were not clicky, but dead. No feeling off the face at all. Sent them back and bought the TM P7MC. Now this is a nice feeling iron.
Imafitter
8 months agoPING? No kickbacks from Ping?…Guess all the Ping pros on all the tours don’t pay much attention to MGS. Don’t blame them.
Ryan
7 months agoJust a top 10 list.
Your comment is unfounded and silly.
Gerry L
8 months agoI am surprised that Callaway apex pro made it as best iron, I tried these irons for 2 weeks , but returned them , all the heads felt dead. Went to Taylormade P7MC instead, much better feeling irons.
Matt A
8 months agoI’m surprised that the Cobra Tour forgiveness rank is not higher. They are the most forgiving irons I’ve ever played.
Paul
8 months agoI play cleveland irons and crush the taylor made-titleist-callaway crowd. I am comfortable with them at address and they feel good coming down like they are almost swinging themselves. They also give me a distance boost thats just right for me. I got lucky I found my match, and it shows on the scorecard. The confidence I have is one thousand times more valuable than the .01 strokes gained decree from MSG.
Keith
7 months agoI don’t believe Cleveland is currently making any irons that even remotely fit in this category.
Scott
8 months agoOnce again, Hogan gets snubbed and not even included in the tests. Icons best players irons I’ve ever played.
JP
8 months agoI brought my Hogan FTX set out of retirement for the better part of this season… Damn there is no better feeling in golf than puring one of those long irons.
There is also no worse feeling catching one thin haha
Home4Ya
9 months agoHit most of those and bought PING i210s, most forgiving and tightest dispersion of all others and I see why it’s 31 iron on LPGA tour, disappointed it wasnt in your test? In this category, distance shouldn’t matter but feel, sound, some forgiveness, and tightest dispersion should be most wanted by us low single handi?
DP
11 months agoI hit the 21 Apex Pros several months ago and luckily found a set for a steal and bought them somewhat blind. I absolutely love them. Moved on from the 19 Apex which I thought were great but these are superior in every way for me. Love the look and performance however I do agree they have a unique click sound to them.
PG
1 year agoWhat are the handicaps and swing speeds of the testers? Do they all have the speed needed to elevate a player’s 4i? Why not include older but current offerings like the i210 that has widespread PGA/LPGS usage? Where is the Apex TCB, which is in almost every Callaway staffers bag?
I love what you guys are doing, but this one seems half baked.
Jeff
1 year agoHa! I happened to buy the Apex Pro’s back in March after a fitting. By far the best investment I’ve made in my golf game for years. Went with the Nippon NS Pro 105 shafts. I’ve gain 15 yards from my 712 CB’s (Yes, I know they were old and high spin).
Les
1 year agoSo I just bought the PXG set (P and T Gen 4). Based on these results, it appears that I am giving up shots to the field every time I play. They rated so poorly, now I have a hard time justifying keeping them in the bag. As the average 5 handicaper, I already give up shots based on my skill level, can’t really afford to give up shots because of crappy equipment too.
WYBob
1 year agoLes: I don’t think you have anything to worry about regarding your PXG Gen 4 irons as a result of the MGS article. If you look at what they measured to determine the best in class, it is a metric called strokes gained. As I understand it strokes gained are a result of an algorithm that measures a result against an average for the rest of the sample. It is usually used as a measurement of a player against the entire field of competitors. How they tweaked it to measure clubs against one another is not clearly laid out. MGS acknowledges they use a proprietary methodology to determine the stokes gained in their analysis. That said, it appears that they presented the results in a stacked bar chart that displays the total strokes gained for each club model and each segment (i.e each of the 3 clubs) therein. The PXG result shows a negative stroke gained of about 1/10th of a stroke in aggregate against the average of all clubs tested. The best club is only slightly more than a positive 1/10th of a stoke better in aggregate than the average. The scaling on the graph used makes this look far more dramatic, but the reality is that these are minute differences in the real world. My walk away from the article was that all these clubs are pretty solid, and it really gets down to things like feel, aesthetics, and turf interaction which are criteria that can’t be measured by a Foresight GCQuad. Enjoy your clubs- you are likely to lose more strokes from 1 or 2 bad swings than any impact from the irons.
Mike
1 year agoHere’s another idea, play them. See how you like them, see how they work. Forget about all this nonsense where something is 0.012 strokes better than the other. The best club for you is the one that works the best for you ,(duh, that’s so simple that it’s almost stupid).. Were you fit for your irons? If yes, then I’m betting you tested them against a bunch of other ones. If you weren’t fit for them and just bought them, well, who knows if they’re right for you (shame on you).
Shiger
8 months agoLooking at the data from a MID HC player……the PXG has AMAZING ball speed and TOTAL distance numbers without having to crank the lofts.
So from a MID HC perspective, I don’t have to swing out of my shoes in order to make them go. I can work on my smooth tempo and transition and still have the distance. These are my pick for BEST players iron from a 5-8 HC perspective!!!!!!
P.J.
1 year agoAlways interesting to describe “distance” leaders, as they’re not all the same loft. I’d be more interested in yards per degree of loft, maybe that would be more telling of which club is truly longer…
ED
1 year agoAgree, there are quite some loft differences which have to be considered.
Mizuno’s lofts are higher than most. Therefore they are easier to play for amateurs. With 7 iron Miz have 33.5 while others are around 31,25 etc…
Big difference !
Kevin
1 year agoNot surprised at the apex ranking. They have been among the best for years. Was surprised by the PXGs though. Premium cost not related to premium performance. Looks like PXG went for distance over accuracy if I’m reading that correctly..
Abraham
1 year agoDoes this adhere to the scientific method? Is the study properly powered to pick up on small differences between clubs? Is it well controlled for the numerous variables involved? Are the results accurate? Are they precise? Are they reproducible? Were testers/data collectors blinded?
In short, no.
James Shepard
1 year agoSomebody’s favorite club didn’t do well.
Abraham
1 year agoI play GI irons so sadly not applicable to me. I actually love reading these articles and commend the effort of the writers with limited resources at their disposal. I just laugh at how seriously people take the results . . . they are just a fun diversion.
dr. bloor
1 year agoYour obsession with power analyses and effect sizes has no place here.
Abraham
1 year agoIt actually does have a place here. If somebody wrote an article and the data could be flawed, where else would that be pointed out other than the comments section? I’m sure the authors are comfortable with criticism.
Ryan
1 year agoIt’s pretty sad that the weakest lofted PW in the group isn’t even 47. Before too long, we’ll have 9 wedges and a 9-iron at 22 degrees.
CrashTestDummy
1 year agoTotally agree. I just got a new set and do not like the juiced up lofts. It is very difficult to gap your bag at the top of the bag (irons to hybrids or woods) and bottom of bag (irons to wedges). Also, the labeling gets weird. I am going to have two gap wedges now. Lol.
Ron
1 year ago@CrashTestDummy…. 2 Gap wedges… A lot of players already carry them, My PW (measured) is 44°, so I do carry a 48° & 54° (both supposed gap wedges) and a 60° lob wedge…..Numbers (5,6,7 iron, etc) don’t mean anything anymore…. every manufacturer is different… You just need to do research, especially if you have a “mixed” bag….. be ridiculous if you had 2 different number irons with the same loft :)…… When people ask me what I just hit, I usually reply with ” my 150 yard club”….Happy golfing….
chrisK
1 year agoAs Ron mentioned, club #’s don’t mean what they once did. Personally, i carry a 44* PW, a 50* gap, and a 54* sand wedge. At the top of the set, 5-iron iBlade, then Ping G400 crossover 5, and then a Ping G400 crossover 3 (it’s like the crossover 5 fills in for my 4 iron, at least in the distance i get out of it). I’m sure i could hit all of those clubs further, but the set makeup i have lets me get decent gaps and still “feel” like i’m hitting a mid-iron, FWIW.
JLS
1 year agoTitleist 620 CB PW is 47 degrees…
Jordan
1 year agoWe need to stop calling things “Players Irons”. T100 is the most used iron on tour yet not in this category… Just use, MB, CB, Multi-Material, Forgiving Irons and call it a day.
chrisK
1 year ago100% agree with your assessment. I can go in Golf Galaxy and see some old-school REAL players irons still being made today, but they look like old-school stuff (Titleist and Wilson are the ones i saw – true blades!). This stuff they’re calling “players irons” don’t look too hard to hit to me at all, compared to some others i’ve seen.
murphy
1 year agoi am so confused by the naming of irons now- player iron distance iron game improvement iron etc etc-if you think that your iron has to have a certain label on it than you are not having fun playing golf- the last set of irons i bought was off the rack with very little offset- that is what i wanted and that is what i got and can not be happier-now i am going read the article
Phillip Bishop
1 year agoThe category names do get a little tricky and confusing. I find myself explaining it to testers who come through our doors and it always makes for great conversation. Minimal offset, thin topline, etc usually make up the Players Iron Category. Players Distance and Game Improvement intertwine a bit nowadays.
Nocklaus
1 year agoSo, what you are saying is that Callaway Apex Pro is the best plyers iron and that´s all…?
You show some numbers …
No personal feelings, not anything about the feel to hit them, nothing?
I like the way reviews were before.
Nothing against Apex Pro. I´d buy tem if I had the money, i´ve had my eye on them. But I sure would like to hear something more than just nimbers …
Phillip Bishop
1 year agoWe do sprinkle in feedback from our testers. Their feedback doesn’t impact our results though.
Jimmy
1 year agoThis isn’t supposed to be a review of the irons, it’s strictly a question of output. They do mention some player feedback, but since this is trying to be as much of an objective performance ranking as possible (“Our rankings are based purely on launch monitor data and quantifiable performance metrics.”), it doesn’t matter how they feel or look. That type of opinion-based stuff varies from person-to-person, but can be easily found with a quick google or youtube search for most of the clubs listed if that’s more what you were looking for.
Benny who enjoys MGS
1 year agoGo read a different site then dude. All of you need to stop your whining and complaining. Its for viewing enjoyment. Not here to meet your personal criteria which only matters to you because you guys all have comtrol issues.
Clam up and go cry to your doormat wife about how this article makes you mad because of your idiotic preferences. Same dudes who slow up the course looking for golf balls because you think you are owed for the ones you lost.
Benny
1 year agoSorry my reply was for Abraham complaining about the tests. Its just for reading and reviews in a more controlled way. MGS is legit and keeps the $$ out of it while trying to show a different way to test.
Regis
1 year agoI’ve played several players irons over the last decade. Never could adapt to graphite shafts. So I re-shafted a set of Miuras with Nippon lightweight steel shafts. Currently playing a set of XXIO forged with Nippon Zelos Pro 70 shafts. I know they’re not players irons but point is if your building a set of irons see if your fitter has lightweight steel shafts available before automatically jumping to graphite
Joe Duffer
1 year agoWhat graphite iron-shafts have you tried? Would you please take the time to describe the differences regarding graphite v.s. lightweight steel?
Tom R
1 year agoPXG finishing dead last clearly standing by their motto “Nobody makes golf clubs the way we do, period”.
Les
1 year agoYou are correct – how are we to take PXG seriously if they finish last and near last for their flagship product (Gen 4 T and P in the players distance review). Mine might be for sale.
Shiger
8 months agoIt really depends on what you are looking for in an iron.
Take a deeper dive into the stats. I’m a 5-8 HC and these are EXACTLY what I am looking for! Perhaps the +2 HC is looking for something else…it all depends on what you need to help your game.
Sebastian
1 year agoI love these tests. I bought the most wanted putter and it improved my putting so much. I will be looking at these when I am going to buy new irons.
MyGolfSpy
1 year ago👊
James
1 year agoSo the key takeaway for me is the best performing iron in your test gained just over 1/10th of a stroke. In other words, get fitted for your shaft and play whatever iron brand looks the best or feels the best to you because there isn’t much difference at all in this category..
Phillip Bishop
1 year agoGetting the proper shaft is critical with any iron category. Players Irons is no different. When it comes to distance, you’ll see minimal difference. But the right shaft can lead to more consistent dispersion and contact.
Bill
1 year agoThe ZX7 in the player category? It would seem the Z-Forged would have been the better candidate.. Also surprised Ping did not submit the Blueprints and/or the i210. The lines defining these club categories continues to get less distinct as the years roll along.
Mike J
1 year agoBill, every iron in this test seems to be a CB and the Z Forged is a muscleback blade so not like for like I would say.
Scott
1 year agoWish you would have included Hogan Icons in your test.
Tom R
1 year agoAgreed