Shot Scope Case Study – Part I
Labs

Shot Scope Case Study – Part I

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Shot Scope Case Study – Part I

In September 2021, ShotScope offered MyGolfSpy readers an opportunity to play and test the Shot Scope V3 GPS and performance tracking watch.

But the divide between golfers who want to get better and those who are willing to put in the work to get better is vast.

Regardless of where you sit on the “want to/will do the work” continuum, we can agree that knowing is better than guessing. As a group, golfers tend to overestimate ability and conveniently excuse mistakes. Hell, even professionals think they hit the ball further than they actually do and Jack Nicklaus quipped, “I never missed a putt in my mind.”

So whether you’re looking to break 80 for the first time or breach the single-digit handicap barrier, it’s vital to confront the brutal facts of what you do well—and where you need to improve.

With that, we selected three members of the testing pool to track throughout this year. Based on several months of performance tracking, Shot Scope identified target areas for improvement in 2022.

This first overview highlights the primary goals for each player and the key improvement areas. We’ll check back in several times throughout the season to see how each player is progressing.

MGS Tester 1 – greggarner

Greg is a very good golfer and carries a 3-handicap. As you might expect, his game is well-rounded without any glaring deficiencies. As such, the aim here is to identify small gains that will allow Greg to consistently shoot lower scores.

Comparing Greg’s Strokes Gained against the scratch golfer in the Shot Scope database, his game is only 1.89 shots off the pace of a scratch golfer. Greg’s tee shots are his strength whereas his putting and approach play offer the greatest opportunities for improvement.

We can see by looking into Greg’s approach play that shots from 100 to 150 yards cost him the most (-0.50), closely followed by shorter approach shots of 50 to 100 yards (-0.20).

However, it is on the green where Greg needs to focus most of his attention. Currently, he averages one three-putt every 14.5 holes. For comparison, a scratch golfer averages one three-putt every 39.2 holes. Greg three-putts nearly three times as often as a scratch golfer.

Breaking down Greg’s putting by using Strokes Gained again highlights that it is long-distance lag-putting that Greg needs to work on the most. This assessment, combined with more traditional statistics on the Shot Scope dashboard, shows Greg averages six feet for his second putt when putting from at least 30 feet. Ultimately, with better pace control from 30 feet and up, Greg will be able to two-putt more often and reduce his three-putt frequency.

Goals for Greg in 2022

  • One three-putt per round
  • Greens in regulation up to 60%

 

MGS Tester 2 – JerBooth

MGS tester Jeremy was able to play only a limited amount (a few nine-hole rounds and just two 18 holes) in 2021 due to course closures in Ontario. (In order to get the most from the data we usually require 10 rounds.) However, with the data available, we have been able to identify a few areas that Jeremy should look to improve in 2022.

Jeremy’s handicap hovers around 12 but his posted rounds sit closer to the scratch benchmark. It’s a small sample size and we will need more data to generate a fully accurate assessment.

That said, his working average score comes in at +2.53. As a result, we used the scratch handicap as a benchmark when looking at Jeremy’s game.

Cross-referencing Jeremy’s Strokes Gained data and “hole types” allowed us to identify two potential areas for improvement: short par-5s and 150- to 200-yard par-3s.

Jeremy averages nearly 300 yards off the tee. Therefore, it would be reasonable to expect him to be score well on the short par-5s as he should be able to reach the green comfortably in two shots, likely with a mid or long iron.

However, approach statistics highlight a huge drop in Green Success Percentage when Jeremy is using an 8- or 9-iron. This also results in an average proximity to hole that more than doubles when using 8- or 9-iron as compared to 7-iron and PW. This inconsistent performance with short irons is most likely what is contributing to Jeremy losing shots on short par-5s and mid-length par-3s.

With the limited data available from Jeremy’s golf in 2021, the suggestions are based on a restricted insight into his game. As Jeremy posts additional rounds in 2022, the data should become clearer. Stay tuned.

Goals for Jeremy in 2022

  • Overall: Improve performance on short par-5s and mid-length par-3s
  • Assess 7-PW and check for specification inconsistencies (loft, lie, length)

MGS Tester 3 – JerryB

Jerry plays off a handicap of 30. However, his Shot Scope statistics show an average score during 2021 at +26.41 versus par.

Strokes Gained on the Shot Scope mobile app allows us to compare Jerry’s game against a 25-handicap golfer (which should be his next target). This analysis shows Jerry is closer to a bogey golfer off the tee and around the greens. His tee shots and short game result in a net gain of nearly six full shots as compared to a typical 25 handicapper.

Putting, however, appears to be a significant weakness for Jerry. More specifically, short putts. Because Jerry is a higher handicap golfer, missed short putts often translates into excessive three-putts.

In 2021, Jerry averaged a three-putt every 3.8 holes. That’s a bit more than four three-putts per round.  Diving into his make percentage from various distances, like many golfers, Jerry struggles from three to six feet when putting.

We recommend that Jerry focuses primarily on his short putting, aiming to increase his make percentage on three- to six-foot putts to 50 percent.

Goals for Jerry in 2022

  • Increase make percentage from three to six feet to 50 percent
  • Reduce number of three-putts (two per round)

Objective data is crucial if you are looking to shoot lower scores. Fundamentally, it allows you to see where you need to improve and assess the effectiveness of any strategy (coaching, drills, new equipment, etc).

Do you use a performance tracking system? If so, which one? What are you looking to improve on in 2022?

Tell us your story!

For You

For You

Irons
Apr 24, 2024
PXG Irons: Model By Model
Putters
Apr 23, 2024
PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
News
Apr 23, 2024
Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris is a self-diagnosed equipment and golf junkie with a penchant for top-shelf ice cream. When he's not coaching the local high school team, he's probably on the range or trying to keep up with his wife and seven beautiful daughters. Chris is based out of Fort Collins, CO and his neighbors believe long brown boxes are simply part of his porch decor. "Isn't it funny? The truth just sounds different."

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Ty

      2 years ago

      I bought shot scope at the beginning of this season to help automate my round tracking. My thoughts so far after about 10 rounds:

      – the shot tracking and location targeting is astonishingly accurate 80-90% of the time, however expect to spend 15+ minutes after each round reviewing each hole, fixing shot locations, missed shots, incorrect clubs, etc. (Note: this is MUCH easier to do on a desktop than a mobile device).
      – The app and V3 watch work well, which is a big complement. I’ve heard mixed reviews on competitors, and this was the reason I went with SS.
      – The support staff is top notch & extremely attentive, speedy, and helpful.
      – As someone who has used Freegolftracker for years, I was surprised and disappointed that there is not really any meaningful longitudinal trend analysis or visualizations. This is a HUGE miss. As someone who plays 100+ rounds a year, it is extremely beneficial to analyze trends in performance over long or specific time periods (ex. before v.s. after a lesson, 2 yrs ago vs last year vs this year).
      – Data viz in general is lacking in my opinion for a premium, purchased product (The free site I mentioned earlier has better data viz, and… is free.). Additionally, Shot Scope lacks the ability to export data to create visualizations yourself.
      – oddly, the phone app analytics and the desktop analytics are not the same. For instance, Strokes gained stats are ‘mobile device only’. This is more of an annoyance than anything, I have to think where I can find specific analytics.

      In summary, its a good product, but it has SO much untapped potential unfortunately.

      Reply

      Tyler

      2 years ago

      ***FOLLOW-UP 5/9/22***

      I got an email this AM that the Shot Scope team just rolled out a new analytics dashboard. Longitudinal analyses are now included, thus my suggestion above is no longer relevant.

      Reply

      GregGarner

      2 years ago

      Really cool analysis. I already knew my approach game needed some help, but I used this write-up to do a little deeper dive and it looks like my misses are short and right. This suggests to me that I’m not committing to the shot. I’ve also been doing a lot of speed work lately on my putting and in the last 15 rounds, my 3-putt average has improved to 1-per-25.8 holes. Huge thanks to ShotScope for helping me focus my practice on the right things to make some improvements!

      Reply

      Jeremy Booth

      2 years ago

      Thats interesting.
      I was thinking about having all of my clubs checked. I’ve never been fitted for a single club in my bag..
      My distances are all over too. I have an Xstiff shaft in my driver but everything else is a stiff shaft. I always wondered if that had something to do with my inconsistencies.
      I’ll get myself setup with a bag check and report back.

      Reply

      Matt Gallo

      2 years ago

      Very cool for MGS to run a test like this. Wish you had used Arccos though! I use Arccos and the data is displayed so much better than Shotscope and it makes it easier to understand. Data can really help you get better, I went from a 7 handicap to a 2 last year just working on what Arccos told me.

      Reply

      Mike

      2 years ago

      Guys, gotta help me with the math here. If “Jerry” is a 30 handicap & he is numerically averaging ~26 over par, shouldn’t his index be somewhere in the 23 range? Maybe I’m reading it wrong but isn’t it impossible that your index w/b higher than your numerical score. Maybe Jerry keeps blowing all those shorter putts because he wants to keep his handicap high for those events that involve money! Lol

      Reply

      JerryB

      2 years ago

      No, no… I just suck, lol.

      Took it up about this time last year and am spit balling my handicap. Regressing so far this season, averaging somewhere between double and triple bogey.

      Reply

      Craig

      2 years ago

      Handicap is not really related to par of the course but the difficulty (Slope) of the course. Augusta is par 72 but a lot harder than a local muni that is also par 72.

      Reply

      JerryB

      2 years ago

      Possibly a silly question here, but how do I go about it? Just repetition? How important is the putting surface?

      Reply

      Cranjis

      2 years ago

      I would say that is dependent on your goals…are you a weekend warrior or a guy that plays 3+ times per week? If you are committed to improvement, Id say numero uno is work with a pro on putting lessons. Sound technique is going to pay the most dividends. After that…practice, and lots of it.

      The putting surface is certainly important…a pro aint gonna be a strong putter on goat track greens. Id search for nicer practice greens in your area and set up camp. :)

      Reply

      Mike

      2 years ago

      Good points made. But putting is probably the most individual thing you can do in terms of golf (can’t remember seeing 2 people putt exactly alike). Get with a pro to get some basic techniques. But I’m definitely a “do what’s comfortable for you” guy…provided that it works. Understand the different types of putters out there & they determine, through sufficient testing, what works best for you, especially related to lie angle & length. And don’t think you need to buy the latest Scotty putter to get good (you don’t).

      JerryB

      2 years ago

      Thanks for the insight! I’m definitely in the “love to play, hate to practice” camp, might need to reprioritize a little.

      Reply

      Jimmy

      2 years ago

      First of all, just keep playing. You’ll get better with more experience. If you want to practice, you really just need to focus on a few key areas:

      1) speed control – that you seem to make an expected number of 3 footers but struggle from 3′-6′ means your stroke is probably relatively consistent (face to target isn’t wildly misaligned). When putts start breaking, speed becomes more important. Lagging closer to the hole will also get you more putts inside of 3 feet where you’re more comfortable.

      Go to your local club and roll lots of different putts on the practice green. Variance will give your brain lots of reps to develop the skill of how hard to hit it. Give yourself objectives, and maybe incorporate something more formal like a ladder drill (google this if you’re not sure what it is).

      2) green reading – same problem and solution as speed… you need to give your brain lots of different reps. There are some good youtube videos on green reading, including intros to things like Aimpoint that can offer tips/tricks. Try lots of things until you find something that works for you.

      If you’re feeling motivated enough to head up to your closest practice green, use that time to focus on speed and green reading. You can work on your stroke consistency at home on a rug or practice mat.

      Reply

      Adam

      2 years ago

      Normally I’d say speed control, but you’re an interesting case in that you are doing ok (vs your handicap) on the longer putts where speed control is the most crucial. Obviously practicing those shorter putts will help. I don’t know your putting style, but I think that many people have watched Tiger slam the ball into the back of the hole on short putts and think that’s the best way to hit them. Since us mortals can’t hit it on line every time like him, I like the strategy on short putts of hitting them softly so we effectively make the hole larger.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Irons
    Apr 24, 2024
    PXG Irons: Model By Model
    Putters
    Apr 23, 2024
    PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
    News
    Apr 23, 2024
    Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.