Srixon, Cleveland & The $5.5 Million Man
News

Srixon, Cleveland & The $5.5 Million Man

Srixon, Cleveland & The $5.5 Million Man

What do you get when you realign your business model, introduce some hot, new, critically acclaimed products and then proceed to go backwards in sales?

You get a new CEO, that’s what.

2015 was not a great year for Srixon/Cleveland golf in the U.S., as sales dropped 0.9% from 2014. That may not sound like a lot, but Dunlop Sports Co. LTD (a subsidiary of Japan’s Sumitomo Rubber Industries – the SRI in Srixon – and the parent company of Srixon, Cleveland and XXIO) says in its annual report the overall golf market in North America actually grew last year.

So not only did Cleveland/Srixon not get its share of that growth, it actually lost ground. That’s kind of hard to do, especially after hitting the streets with a full line of new and universally praised irons, woods and balls.

Apparently the Journey to Better took a detour.

Enter Matt Yasumoto, the new president and CEO of Srixon/Cleveland/XXIO – USA. His assignment seems straightforward: reestablish, reinvigorate and revitalize the Srixon and Cleveland brands in North America, while maintaining growth in the premium XXIO line.

Srixon-Cleveland CEO Matt Yasumoto - 3

Tall orders, to be sure. And the obstacles are the same ones facing Wilson Staff, Bridgestone, Hogan or any of the other challenger brands: brand awareness, product availability, and overall excitement.

Changes At The Top

Matt Yasumoto is a Dunlop Sports veteran. He’s served as Executive Director of Srixon Sports – Asia, President of Cleveland Golf – Japan, and Director of Dunlop Sports’ Overseas Business Planning Group. In an exclusive interview with MyGolfSpy, Yasumoto says North American changes have already begun.

“As far as sales and marketing are concerned, we have a new corporate structure taking place in the U.S. office,” he says. “There will be significant changes in both of those areas.”

Dunlop Sports uses the Japanese management principle Genchi Genbutsu, or go and see. It says the best way to identify and solve problems is to get out of the boardroom and see for yourself what’s actually happening in your own organization and in the marketplace. Dunlop’s annual report says all three brands will be more present in local markets this year, in order to “thoroughly confirm the facts with our own eyes.”

Genchi Genbutsu

As a result, says Yasumoto, you can expect to see more local Cleveland, Srixon and XXIO events in the coming months.

“For example, the XXIO Experience Days are for a specific type of more affluent consumer, the Scoring Clinics may be for a customer more interested in scoring and the Cleveland brand, and the Srixon ‘Switch To Better’ allows us to be more aggressive with golf balls on a national level. We’re focused on creating unique and different experiences for all three brands.” – Matt Yasumoto, CEO, Srixon/Cleveland/XXIO – USA.

One fact plaguing the Srixon brand specifically is lack of retail availability. Yasumoto says the company is vowing to “go and see,” and be more present in the marketplace.

“One way to gain brand recognition is to use the PGA Tour, the Champions Tour, and the Web.com tour” says Yasumoto. “We’re also expanding the dealer distribution network for Srixon. We are trying to improve our service levels to both dealers and consumers, and we are striving to differentiate ourselves from our competitors in service.”

The $5.5 Million Man?

It’s one thing to say you need expanded retail presence, but it’s much harder to actually do. Every armchair golf industry expert with a computer will tell you challenger brands need to be in stores, because you won’t buy what you can’t try. But more retail presence is very difficult to pull off because shelf space is at a premium. The Big 6 dominate retail space, leaving precious little room for the challengers. As a result, it’s important that growth goals be realistic.

jb_sx_hp

Dunlop Sports has a 2016 sales target of just under $75 Million for North America. That number reflects an 8% increase, or $5.5 Million. To put sales into perspective, Wilson Staff reports annual worldwide sales in the $120 Million range, while Callaway’s 2015 worldwide sales approached $900 Million.

A $5.5 Million jump doesn’t sound daunting, until you realize the first half of 2016 will go by with no new product to help fuel the growth other than the Z 355 irons and woods, which debuted last fall.

“We’re adamant about maintaining product life cycles and not chasing sales numbers. We keep two-year life cycles. Consumers need to feel comfortable to make a purchasing decision, and dealers need to feel comfortable not suddenly having closeout or markdown product without worrying about their own profit margins” – Matt Yasumoto

New products expected later this year should provide a sales bump. Srixon is releasing a new low-compression ball this summer and a new full line of clubs this fall to replace the 2-year old Z 545 and 745 woods and irons. Cleveland is releasing new wedges and putters in September.

And speaking of Cleveland…

A Cleveland Comeback?

It ‘s been about two years since Cleveland transitioned away from a full line brand to instead focus on only wedges and putters. So far, not so good though, as Dunlop Sports’ 2015 annual report singles out the Cleveland brand’s performance in North America as “disappointing.”

Srixon-Cleveland CEO Matt Yasumoto - 4

“In retrospect, it was too rapid to make that decision,” says Yasumoto of repositioning Cleveland. “It was a decision that should have been made over the course of three to five years. That rapid change caused a lot of conflict and confusion with dealers and end users.”

Is there a future for a full-line Cleveland? Is a comeback in the cards?

“There is an opportunity to bring the Cleveland brand back into the market. We have no hesitation to utilize Cleveland’s long history of innovation, and we are not limiting ourselves to Cleveland as purely a short game and putter brand.” – Matt Yasumoto

So will we see Cleveland back as a full-line brand? Dunlop Sports isn’t saying yes, but it isn’t saying no, either.

“We know there is still a high degree of brand equity for Cleveland,” says Yasumoto. “And there are many golfers around the world who still appreciate the value of Cleveland Golf products.”

Dunlop’s leadership clearly believes there’s still life in the Cleveland brand, and that dismissing any remaining brand equity would be a mistake.

An interesting side note: Dunlop’s golf sales actually grew 4% worldwide last year, despite the disappointing performance in the U.S. However, Dunlop Sports reported an annual net loss, largely due to a one-time amortization of goodwill of the Cleveland brand of nearly $36 Million. It’s an accounting move used when the value of an asset has fallen below what the company originally paid for it. Dunlop/Sumitomo bought Cleveland in 2007 for $132.5 Million.

Market Specific Marketing

Yasumoto does believe the Srixon, Cleveland, and XXIO brands are sitting in an interesting position in North America.

“Our structure is pretty unique compared to our competitors in that we have R&D teams in both the U.S. and Japan, and also a marketing team in the U.S. and Japan,” says Yasumoto. “What makes that unique is we have Japanese technology plus U.S. marketing strength. If can we can capitalize on them together, we should be in a very unique position compared to pure Japanese brands or pure American brands.”

Srixon Japan 2

So what you’ll see is global branding with a twist. International corporations love global branding because, in theory, it creates a single global identity (which investors like) and it saves money (which investors really like). Global marketing, however, has limitations because what plays in Kobe or Osaka may not play in Amarillo or Dubuque.

“Advertisements that make total sense in Asia sometimes don’t make sense in Western Countries. The coordination between East and West will be very important for brand recognition. Every regional market will be strong in communicating new product benefits and field activity.” – Matt Yasumoto

That means the Srixon brand is being marketed somewhat differently in Japan than it is here. In Japan, Srixon is a market leader known for quality, innovation and craftsmanship. Brand awareness and availability are strengths, so marketing is from a leadership position. In the U.S. Srixon is a challenger brand, and brand awareness and availability are weaknesses, so the marketing plan must be more nimble, aggressive, and local market specific to support the company’s growth strategy.

Srixon-XXIO Japan 1

One tangible example is Dunlop’s collaboration with ThirdChannel, an independent market research and in-store merchandising specialist. ThirdChannel builds relationships and brand loyalty with retailers, conducts sales training, and holds in-store marketing events.

If you encounter a Srixon booth at a local golf course or store this summer, chances are you’ll be talking with what ThirdChannel calls a Retail Intelligence Agent. Dunlop says the initiative is ball-focused, designed to aggressively raise Srixon brand awareness in local markets.

XXIO – The Japanese PXG

For the record, Bob Parsons did not invent the premium golf equipment market. Dunlop’s XXIO brand has been selling $800 drivers, $550 Fairway woods and $80-a-dozen golf balls long before PXG was even a twinkle in GoDaddy’s eyes.

“We started XXIO in 2000 in Japan and went right to No. 1, and it hasn’t changed since,” says Yasumoto. “We just introduced the ninth generation of XXIO last December, and we’ve consistently dominated the market in both Japan and Korea for 17 years.”

XXIO 2

One can argue whether lines such as PXG, XXIO or the new Titleist C-16 actually provide premium performance in line with their premium price. But what can’t be argued is that there is, in fact, a sustainable market for these high end lines.

“When we started XXIO in North America, we didn’t know if it would go well or not. But having events like the XXIO Experience Days (high end, private demo events at high end, private courses), we became pretty confident there would be a demand for XXIO in this market. We think we have great potential for XXIO to grow, so we’re planning to put the foot on the gas to expand XXIO accounts throughout the country.” – Matt Yasumoto

Another Challenger?

So, can Matt Yasumoto lead the Srixon and Cleveland brands out of the market share doldrums, as well as grow the XXIO line in what is becoming a crowded high-end equipment arena? The trite answer is “time will tell.”

Srixon-Cleveland CEO Matt Yasumoto - 1

The dollar growth target – $5.5 Million – is certainly modest and realistic. The old business adage “if you keep doing what you’ve been doing you’ll keep getting what you’ve been getting” most certainly applies. Don’t underestimate how disappointing 2015 was to the Cleveland and Srixon brands in the U.S., so more of the same going forward certainly isn’t an option.

Yasumoto comes to the U.S. with the clear task of implementing change. We’ve already seen changes in Dunlop’s P.R. department, and major overhauls are either coming or have already been made in the sales and marketing operations. Programs such as the ThirdChannel initiative are focused on creating brand awareness and presence in your local markets, and a new wave of Cleveland and Srixon products are coming this fall.

Genchi Genbutso is the new rule of the day.

Will it be enough to get you to buy $5.5 Million more worth of Cleveland, Srixon and XXIO? What are your thoughts of the Cleveland, Srixon and XXIO brands, and can the new leadership turn the ship in the right direction?

For You

For You

We Tried It
Apr 18, 2024
We Tried It: Penfold Sunday Stand Bag
News
Apr 18, 2024
Amazon Finds: The Callaway Swing Easy
Best Drivers for Low Swing Speeds Best Drivers for Low Swing Speeds
Drivers
Apr 17, 2024
Best Drivers For Low Swing Speed Golfers
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John is an aging, yet avid golfer, writer, 6-point-something handicapper living back home in New England after a 22-year exile in Minnesota. He loves telling stories, writing about golf and golf travel, and enjoys classic golf equipment. “The only thing a golfer needs is more daylight.” - BenHogan

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

Ask MyGolfSpy: Wilson Golf
Apr 19, 2024 | 25 Comments
We Tried It: Penfold Sunday Stand Bag
Apr 18, 2024 | 5 Comments
Shot Scope V5 Golf Watch
Apr 3, 2024 | 14 Comments
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Rickr

      8 years ago

      I have a set of the Srixon Z-355 irons. Fantastic clubs, But come on Srixon how about making the rest of your irons in LEFT handed!!

      Reply

      Mike D

      8 years ago

      I have played many OEM sets as many others have. I own and really enjoy my Wilson Ci11’s and bought them based on the strength of a MGS review and after hitting my brother’s cir’s which felt fantastic. I also bought a set of new Cleveland 588TT and they are also fantastic just as others have said, and first time I used them shot my all time lowest score! Wilson is the most under-rated brand in golf. And others are correct in that the Cleveland name carried the sales – I used to work and golf with Japanese guys in my lab and they all bought Cleveland before they went back home (10 years ago). Not sure why corporate types decide to dumb down great American brands that have a loyal following.

      Reply

      ComeOnSense

      8 years ago

      I have a set of Srixon Z-745 ,they are amazing,easy to hit and longer than Obama 2nd term.

      Reply

      CG

      8 years ago

      I’ve gamed Srixon irons for years, back to the i-302s and currently have the phenomenal z945 blades. They are exceptional irons. But their woods have always been underwhelming and the distribution and reps are terrible. I’ve never seen a demo day and I’ve never seen a rep engage my green grass account. If they actually want to be a player they should reboot Cleveland back to woods and wedges, keep SRI as a premier iron brand and get the products into consumers hands. They’ve done an awful job w that last part. They can Journey to All the Adjectives Used as Nouns slogans they want but without spiffing pros and retailers and getting their clubs in hands it won’t matter

      Reply

      cocheese

      8 years ago

      I hit the Z745 irons in the store not long ago and was blown away. Amazing product. Soft, forgiving enough, and look just right. They make nice drivers and balls too. They simply need better marketing I guess, because they certainly have a quality product in my eyes.

      Reply

      Golfwhiler

      8 years ago

      I regret not buying the last model of Cleveland CB irons before the product dump. They felt great and could have been obtained for a song. I just couldn’t get the trajectory I wanted with the shaft options available at the time. Must say that I prefer Vokey wedges, but my new Cleveland TFI 1.0 putter is fantastic. Fantastic to the tune of five strokes off my game. YMMV

      Reply

      RAT

      8 years ago

      This is for Rob Head, You should get out more . I play Wilson Staff V2 forged irons , wedges and hybrids and their balls. There are several whom play them here. Wilson is on the way up to the top where they were the KING and will return again. Don’t be scaried -try them

      Reply

      RP

      8 years ago

      I suspect Wilson is big in junior clubs too? I remember as a kid in my area, everyone played callaway X irons, cleveland TA irons, or wilson fat shafts

      Reply

      RAT

      8 years ago

      I have a set of Srixon irons i506’s and they are great. Love Srixon products but it did seem like when they purchased Cleveland it just went into a period of stall. I like their designs and looks but then nothing new developed for a long while. I have watched on youtube their XXIO manufacturing process in the plant and am very impressed with what I saw. As far as Cleveland they seam to have died or almost so.I like the wedges but there is limited options and the feel is a little harsh. I always thought their irons were among the best on the market along with drivers.
      I do hope the pricing is going to be a little lower than what is presently out there. Wish the best and I’m waiting to see what designs come out and maybe unique too!

      Reply

      Large chris

      8 years ago

      I have doubts that the golf hard goods market will ever be profitable in the West on a large scale, simply because TM ‘brought’ the market with so many huge endorsement deals. Now TM predictably have discovered their numbers don’t add up and will have to row back, but that just means Cleveland will still have to spend big, or get lucky (More winners like Matsuama) with tour play, to get noticed.

      Reply

      petermo

      8 years ago

      I bought a set of 588TT irons last year after a custom fitting and love them. I’ve played for 64 years and have had many sets of irons from Hogan Apex thru Callaway razr tours and Cleveland have always produced great looking clubs that perform well. The tech in the 588s is excellent – forged feel at a very fair price and they fly like frozen rope. i have 1.2 dozen wedges too.

      I hope they come back with a full range. Great sticks.

      Reply

      John Schwerdt

      8 years ago

      Awesome news! Been bagging nothing but Cleveland clubs for 7 years. Time tested designs with modern influence and manufacturing techniques, never fails. I was always a fan of Clevelands general aura in the market. Never over produced, never over released, never overpriced and always had a quality offering for almost every level golfer. While hunting for exact cleveland clubs I want on eBay is fun, I long to be able to go to a local dealer and get exactly what I want.

      Bring Cleveland back!

      Reply

      Tom Duckworth

      8 years ago

      It will be very interesting to see what shakes out with Taylormade they really shot themselves in the foot. I don’t want to buy a club or driver and see a new one that’s marketed as better in less than a year that is just bad business no matter how you look at it. It had to break down sooner or later. That more than anything put me off that brand. I do hope they pull it together however.
      That may give brands like Cleveland, Srixon & Wilson a shot at more market share.
      I think Srixon has made some of the best reviewed and best looking irons the last few years I guess we need to see more of them on tour before people start putting them in their bags. Wilson staffers have had some good showings on tour this year. Wilson equipment is very good as well.

      Reply

      Mike Eakins

      8 years ago

      I have played the hb 3’s for a few years I’m a 5 hdc. And love these clubs. Will Cleveland have a new set of irons.

      Reply

      mathieu

      8 years ago

      My experience with srixon was sad. They(golftown) finally decided to carry srixon. Was very excited at the beginning of the last season and told the supervisor that i wanted a full fitting from the srixon/cleveland fitter. Never got back to me. And i ask twice for it. I was ready to spend a full bag of money and they lost a sale because the golftown was too busy pushing the taylormade/callaway product.

      Its a shame for us canadian that we only have golftown. They always push the stock sale. They should push the custom fitting. This is the major reason i started to obly buy my equipment from the web. This is why i have bridgestone irons in my bag.

      Reply

      Sean

      8 years ago

      I have been around cleveland since the quad pro days. Ta5 was a huge success and not to mention the launcher series. I think if they get back to a set that is really good at 599.99 steel and graphite 699.99. They will force the market to compete. Just make it a good product. The average joe who loves the game and can’t afford the thousand dollar set will be all over it. Leave srixon to the high dollar sets!

      Reply

      Madison

      8 years ago

      I work in a golf shop and we’re cutting back on our brands.
      Nike….. See Ya
      Adams……See Ya
      Srixon/Cleveland…… See Ya
      TaylorMade……. Maybe the next See Ya
      We only need Titleist…..Ping….Callaway…..a little bit of Cobra and Muzino
      Why stock what doesn’t sell?
      See Ya

      Reply

      dean

      8 years ago

      wow, 75 million. when SRI took over Srixon in ’08, I think sales were somewhere near 120/130 mill globally, and that was without any Srixon reveune. It just goes to show how much that CG business has dropped off. Cant say I’m surprised. SRI wanted Cleveland to expand Srixon distribution in the US, and the inside word at the time was SRI were planning to make Cleveland their ‘entry’ level brand (with Srixon sitting above that & XXIO at the premium level). That never made sense to me, as Cleveland always had the reputation as a ‘players’ club…. the game improvement stuff never sold that well. It looks like they’ve sure done a good job of moving the brand down, as the product really has dropped off in terms of shape & style. The lack of R&D focus is obvious & the constant price cutting has killed that brands reputation with it’s core customer base. Switching all their tour players over to Srixon cant have helped Cleveland sales either (in the US anyway)… I just cant see them genuinely getting behind a Cleveland re-birth. My guess is their when they ‘go & see”, their real interest will still be on generating more Srixon, and XXIO, sales. Be interesting to see where they go with this… a golf brand in decline? That’s a very difficult turn-around.

      Reply

      ryebread

      8 years ago

      I tend to agree about Srixon’s intentions with “go and see.” You have to think that’s how to expand Srixon in the US, not to do anything with Cleveland.

      I think Cleveland is dead outside of wedges. The rest of the value has been stripped out of the brand.

      It’s a shame because Cleveland really had it right with a couple of their other offerings. The 588 hybrids and FWs were fantastic and significantly better than some of their recent previous offerings. Their hybrid iron sets were also very unique on the market — nothing else that I’ve seen on the market offered the integrated set with smooth gapping, forgiveness AND lack of offset. There was other value with the Cleveland brand, but Srixon has killed that.

      Reply

      Jimmy Deep

      8 years ago

      poor people shouldn’t play golf……

      Reply

      Robert Morgenthal

      7 years ago

      The belief that I have money (a very very questionable statement when factoring in the amount of held debt), “makes me and my opinions much more important than you!!!” That type of reasoning is why the number of players and the number of courses is significantly dropping.

      Reply

      Guy Crawford

      8 years ago

      Srixon has been putting out great new stuff. The 545/745 lines rock. Of course Cleveland Wedges speak for themselves.

      Reply

      mcavoy

      8 years ago

      Cleveland’s older Dynamic Sole Grind wedges were genius. If you couldn’t get out of a bunker w/those things you should quit.

      Reply

      ryebread

      8 years ago

      I’ve owned clubs from pretty much every OEM on the US market, and some JDM things that aren’t sold in the US. Every single club in my bag has had to “earn” both its way in as well as “earn” its spot in an ongoing fashion. I love golf clubs and trying new ones. I don’t really have any brand loyalty. Price isn’t really part of the discussion, it’s more about what works.

      Having said that, currently 11 of the 14 clubs in my bag are from Cleveland. Their products offer a good blend of forgiveness, looks, ease of launch, etc.. I think they’re good in part because they’re a bit “middle of the road.” They’re not the longest, or the lowest spinning (well, except for that Classic XL driver line), the lightest, have the most offset, etc., but they’re very balanced and end up making very consistent performers that in turn make it fairly easy to put together a mixed set with even gaps and flow.

      What’s happened in the last 5 years to Cleveland as a brand is a shame. Here’s to hoping some positive news comes their way in the US market.

      Reply

      leandean

      8 years ago

      I’m kind of a late advocate for Cleveland since the CG14 series. I’ve bought CG14, CG16 and 588’s and was looking forward for the next series which apparently ain’t happening. I liked Cleveland for their consistency from model year to model year without any ‘greatest and newest’ claims (forget the zip grooves though they have better holding the green characteristics ). Kinda reminded you of MacDonalds. You always know what you’re going to get: Minor improvement in feel, performance and appearance.

      Reply

      Mike W

      8 years ago

      Maybe that should be Cleveland Golf’s next slogan: “Were Kinda Like McDonald’s”

      Reply

      Chad Schmeling

      8 years ago

      Not unless they improve their product.

      Reply

      GilB

      8 years ago

      I certainly hope so for several reasons. I’ve been a Cleveland loyalist for years and continue to buy their new wedges (RTX 2.0) because I believe in the product. I still play the older CG16 irons and play the older Launcher fairway woods. I’ve purchased their newer model irons and fairway woods over the years but sadly, they are not quality products in terms of performance or technology so I sold them. They need to step up and obviously improve their respective products to remain a viable option against the higher priced big boys. If they fold up the tent and remove themselves from the golf business it will compress the options even further and I believe raise prices even higher for quality products. The Srixon line of products is slowly replacing the Cleveland brand and slowly pushing it to extinction. The XXIO is a ridiculously priced high end(?) product. If the current trend continues in terms of pricing, the golf industry is in trouble. We want to grow the game, not price the everyday golfer out of the game. We want to keep and offer the current group of golfers new and improved products, don’t we? Pricing trends will eliminate that possibility not only for clubs and balls, but for the incidentals as well. I love to see new products that truly have new technological advantages as announced by the manufacturer and try them out to gain that extra yardage. Who doesn’t? We’ll wait and see what is introduced but, quite honestly, I’m not getting my hopes up. Good luck to Cleveland/Srixon/XXIO/Dunlop or whatever they care to call themselves. The “proof is in the pudding” as they say and I can’t wait for the new pudding.

      Reply

      dcorun

      8 years ago

      I’ve played Cleveland for years. I currently play the 588 MT irons which are really good and the Classic XL driver and 3 wood. The driver and 3 wood were very underrated in my opinion. It’s a shame because the Launcher was a heck of a driver I used for years and so was the HiBore. They have always made quality woods and irons. The Srixon Z355 line looks pretty good and I may consider a change later this year but, I miss the Cleveland brand. I wish Srixon/Cleveland good luck in they’re comeback.

      Reply

      LAbillyboy

      8 years ago

      I’ve played Cleveland wedges for over 15 years, I had a couple of their drivers (400, 460 Launcher) that were top of the line for their day. Any golf company can put out a top product but getting the buzz to get retailers to stock it and customers to buy it is a different animal. Having been a sales rep for a major brand at one time, I know when you have a “hot” product the retailers are your best friend, you can’t ship product fast enough. They’ll pay anything to get it. It brings traffic which leads to consumables and softgoods sales. When your stuff goes stale, they don’t take it in. The wedge business actually is one where you can get steady volume without big technology investments, the Cleveland Wedges, Vokey’s and even Hogan’s back in the day would always move. Putter’s are another consistent business, Scotty is selling old technology for premium price points just based on quality and tour use. Heck, stamp a Circle T on one and people will pay $thousands for it… The sales programs are also key to placing gear, if you have a hot product, you can tie availability to taking in the full line… It you don’t have a hot product, you can sell what the retailer knows he can move… some guys will keep you around just in case you have a hot product next year… once a company has gone a couple cycles without something noteworthy, buyers stop seeing the sales reps..

      Reply

      Paul Kielwasser

      8 years ago

      Z545 irons are the best I’ve played. If they can just get their product in consumers hands, they will be successful.

      Reply

      Jari Hakonen

      8 years ago

      As long as he understands that golf is much like religion: make people believe in things. Facts dont really matter.

      Reply

      Dennis Duncan

      8 years ago

      No

      Reply

      Andrew Adamonis

      8 years ago

      No. CEOs don’t do anything but extract from companies.

      Reply

      John Barba

      8 years ago

      Hasn’t been my experience at all.

      There are good CEO’s and not so good CEO’s — the good ones are leaders, set the tone for the company, create a culture of accountability, set an agenda for the company and work to see the company progresses towards its goals.

      Poor CEO’s tend to set the wrong agendas, hire or promote the wrong people and and fail to lead through difficult times. Yasumoto’s resume led Dunlop to put him in charge of the company in the world’s largest golf market.

      Does he have the stuff to make a difference? As the saying goes, “we’ll see…”

      Reply

      Guanto

      8 years ago

      The 545 and 745 irons were great but hard to find. When they caught on last spring there weren’t enough sets made, so on to back order for 3 months which lost a lot of buyers. I’m surprised the wedges (588 2.0) didn’t to better considering how good they are tho.

      Reply

      Dennis

      8 years ago

      A lot of people don’t want or can’t pay a $100+ for a single club. Gotta start making this game MORE affordable. Not everyone makes 6 figures. They had better start looking at their demographics. Those 2.0 wedges are sic!!!

      Reply

      Clayobx

      8 years ago

      Dennis your right to a degree. “Most people don’t want?” I agree a buck or buck thirty nine hurts! However, research, development, marketing etc. are costly. I’m one that “wants” new technology but retired and on a somewhat fixed income dictates what I buy. There are plenty of outlets with decent knock offs and a viable used market on all the major OEM clubs. If a guy or girl wants to play new tech its there at a reasonable price.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    We Tried It
    Apr 18, 2024
    We Tried It: Penfold Sunday Stand Bag
    News
    Apr 18, 2024
    Amazon Finds: The Callaway Swing Easy
    Best Drivers for Low Swing Speeds Best Drivers for Low Swing Speeds
    Drivers
    Apr 17, 2024
    Best Drivers For Low Swing Speed Golfers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.