I have the MTB Blacks and love them.. These balls perform as well as Pro V1 in all conditions. They stop on a dime and can be worked in the air. Best ball on the market right now and at an unbelievable price.

Played the original MTB and liked it but thought it spun a bit much off the driver. Also noticed that the <150 yard shots don't check .
Putted well and was happy to keep Dean Snell busy..Then the new balls came out and found they were a worthy replacement. Handled wind better and stopped marginally better (the Red,that is. Have the blacks on the way this week). It's been a number of years since I was a single digit handicap and the Snell is a solid ball for me at this point. The Black actually sounds like a better fit for me although I really like the Red…Nothing against Titleist but $16-20 more a dozen makes the MTB an easy choice at this point.

I’ve found >1,000 excellent condition premium balls over the past few years, so many that I’ve sold off a bunch. Haven’t bought balls since 2008 & I play frequently. Couldn’t imagine laying out ~$50 for a dozen balls.

Fan of Snell MTB balls, have not tried the newest balls as I still many dozens, but you definitely can’t go wrong with the cost and performance being top notch.

I used to play Pro V1/V1x as well but tried the Kirkland 4-piece and Vice Pro+ last year and I find no reason to pay more for Titleist. I’ll be playing the Snell Black and Red this spring (along with OnCore Elixr and Cut Blue and Grey) to check those out. So many affordable urethane balls to choose from (right now the Vice Pro+ is my go to ball) but I’ll just keep trying different ones out to see which one fits my game the best 🙂

I have been playing MTB since it came out. I play because I believe that it is the best ball on the market. The same guy designed both balls but he designed this one most recently. I have had 2 holes in one with Snell balls and the biggest issue I have with them is giving away 4-5 dozen per year to curious golfers. Believe in the Dean!!

Would very much like to see a comparison using the new Snell RED!

Strickly comes down to price

Is accuracy really a thing when comparing golf balls?

I mean, golfers are so inconsistent a ball finishing 15 yards or 17 yards offline is down to the swing that was put on it not the ball.

Its like comparing two snooker balls pink and black and saying on average after testing the pink missed by slight more than the black (Even though they are identical) the difference being the the players attempt, same with golf balls, if i swing well ANY ball goes where i want it to… ball do not just go offline for no reason they have 1 side.

I use Snell golf balls. The performance is on par in my opinion to my old Pro v’s and much cheaper.
I don’t think they last as long but performance wise they’re spot on.
Great indeph review. Ty

I played the MTB for six dozen balls. They played great! The only issue was they only lasted about 9 holes before I had to take the ball out of play. Any wedge struck full or even 3/4 would scuff the ball and pull small threads that looked like dreadlocks.

MGS-
I’d really like to know what the descent angles were here- that’s very important to green-holding, as we all know.

Great article.

Or, for $1.00 per ball I’ll continue to play Lost Golf Balls dot Com ProV1X 2016 4AAAA.

The Snell Red and Black MTB balls haven’t shown up on the Canadian website. Hopefully, they’ll get there soon.

The Snell Red and Black MTB balls haven’t shown up on the Canadian website. Hopefully, they’ll get ther soon.

Getting time to rethink price points over at Titleist headquarters

I’ve played the Snell MTB a number of times and liked the performance. I just received the “trial pack”; with both the black and red and will start my own testing tomorrow.
To me, the Pro-V1 has always been overpriced. I usually play the Bridgestone 330- RXS and think it’s comparable to the Snell MTB.
These test results don’t surprise me, especially with the driver.
For the money, I can’t justify the extra $20.00/doz just to tell my buddies “well, I play the Pro-V1”.

This ball is so responsive to every type of shot that needs to be hit. I do think the driver spin is still a bit high though. I shot two of my best rounds of the year recently with this ball and will continue to game it. If I had to sum this up with one sentence that sentence would be. The snell mtb black golf ball performs as if Titleist were to make a ProV1/X golf ball. For me it had some of the characteristics of the regular ProV1 and some of the characteristics of the ProV1X combined into one golf ball. Cant really go wrong there in my opinion.

I would have preferred to see a test including an 8 iron along with the 6 iron and wedge. Also going to all that trouble you should have done all 4 versions prov1 x and red/black

The driver test & results was to be expected with those balls, hell even a 3 year old , water logged pinnacle gold would have been close to those numbers.

i have said all along premium balls should be judged from 135 yards and in.

I’ve been playing the MTB for about 2 years. I prefer the duller whiteness of the former generation MTB over the bright white of the new MTB Red. However, I did get the 2nd hole-in-one of golfing life a couple of weeks ago with the MTB Red. So, I guess I’ll just have to get used to the optics of the latest gen MTB.

Proof of the power of the Titleist brand is the crazy comments defending their pricing.

I like the Snell ball can’t tell the difference…in the spirit of David taking on Goliath — just ordered 6 dozen Snell Blacks.

Beyond nice margins, Titleist does exhaustive testing/quality control ..it comes from their legacy…wound balls were tricky business. Solid construction does not need the level of testing on every ball. Dean Snell ex-Titleist Pro V1 engineer figured that out and selling direct to consumer was the way to go. And, spends too much money on sponsoring tour pros. Titleist will be forced to change all of above…soon.

This is one test where the Foresight GCQuad is not a great tool. An important part of golf ball design is aerodynamics. The GCQuad just estimates this.

And the only radar in open range will provide data on how the ball actually flies (vs. just launches)

Hi, just wandering… Are refurbished ball so much worse than new ones? I’m new to the game, and lose quite a few balls during the round ;). I’m from Europe so Snell balls cost quite a lot when I add shipping. I’m currently playing a refurbished Srixon Soft feel, which comes to about 60c (0.74$) per ball, snells comes to 2.55€ (3.14$) per ball… Snell UK don’t deliver to EU…

A little disappointed in MGS on this one. Not with the test but with the conclusion. I personally don’t even like pro v 1’s but I would call the data too close to declare a winner. If price was the deciding factor that should be clearly stated. Also I think the other comments are fair that virtually no one pays $52 a dozen for pro vs. Could have called them virtually equal, with the Snell generally saving $1 a ball….

I’ve been using the SNELL ball for a year (and ProV1’s) and really can’t find much difference! SNELL is way less expensive and delivers to your home. Its a pretty good ball!

This is a great test that once again shows that the price demanded by Titleist cant be justified, unless you are strictly looking for brand.

Also trying being in Canada where a Doz ProV1 set you back $64 BEFORE TAX

They pay huge dollars for pros to play their ball…they would play a range ball if the money was right.

I’ve played pro vs for some time and last year I tried the mtb and they’re extremely comparable with in my opinion a small difference in spin and around the greens…happy to game either ball

Am I the only one that looks at the local shop for Tournament range/practice or overrun balls? After doing a ball fitting (hold your comments, ) it came down to Chrome Soft or ProV1. I have the most accurate and consistent distance (personally) with PV1. Just spend the $20/dzn and mark them up how you want to IMO. But figure out your swing speed and the TYPE of swing you have as well first. My .02

Thank you for the excellent reviews. I would like to see a comparison between either of these and Vice Pro or Pro Plus. I am not a pro golfer by any means but single digit handicap, played on college team a long time ago and have started using Vice and find them as good for me. I would just like to see how others felt. Again thanks for all the great reviews.

I played the original MTB and liked it. I really didn’t notice a difference between it and other tour balls and I save $12 to $16 per dozen. I have never been a fan of the Pro Vs even though they are good balls.
I have not tried the new Snell balls, but with the minimal differences indicated in the testing I see no reason to pay more for the same performance.

Guys and Gals Try the OnCore Elixr Ball . Better then the Prov1x
and Crome soft which I have been using . I am a 4 handicap and 70 years old with a club head speed of 90-94. Ball is longer by 20 yards anda half to 1 whole club longer! Great around the greens for chipping and great feel on putts!!

Please, nobody charges $52 a box for Pro V’s… my local golf course sells them for $45… so versus $32 for Snell’s it’s basically $1 a ball. If you care, you can hit the Titleist semi annual sale and get down to $36 a doz..

When green fees are $55 spending an extra $1-3 a round on balls is insignificant… I’ll stick with Titleist or TM or Callaway (balls I’m playing now)… I can just buy them at the course when I need more… much easier.

I just ordered mine and are due to arrive tomorrow. They also now have a three piece urethane ball.

I have gamed the Pro V1 for years and play to a 2 HDCP. Received my sample pack of Red and Black MTB and here is my feedback.

Played the Red for 3 holes and did not like the spin on 150yds and in, the Red was solid off the driver.

Switched to the Black for the rest of the round. I really like this ball off the driver, irons, and putting. Durability was better than Pro V1.

The Black MTB did have less “check” on chip shots and rolled out a bit more, just need to some practice to adjust.

One difference that causing hesitation to make a long-term switch is the performance in the wind. Yesterday, the wind was consistently 10-15mph with gusts around 20mph. Pro V1’s seem to handle these conditions better with less “balloon” effect, however, it could be attributed to early season ball striking as well!

Overall, great ball.

Getting ready to place my order for the MTB test pack.

Unless your breaking 70 from the tips, you’ll ending up shooting just about the same with ‘found balls’. If these expensive balls are so great
and straight , why do I find so many ‘O B’ or in the water,,,etc. ???
Great article for those who think it’s the ball fault. Very informative research, keep up the great work.

You goobers that are claiming Titleist’s “Buy 3 Get 4” deal need to understand that it’s only a “PROMOTION”. Hello!!!! The comparison is for regular pricing. Therefore, the difference is a minimum $20 / dozen between the Snell MTB and Pro-V1. With there being very little difference between the two balls, the Snell MTB has been a real find for me. Awesome all-around high performance ball. Love it!!

What about the feel between the two? Or the sound it makes while putting. That to me is more important than a few yards.

Was a test done with the Prov”s ,Snell and the Vice balls? What about “refurbished” ball’s. I just got burned on some Callaway 5 piece refurbished sphere’s!

Where are you paying $52 a dozen? With the current 3 get 1 free deal you can get them for $36 a dozen on a “volume deal”. They are more expensive than Snell but not the exaggeration you portray in the article.

Stop taking advertising money from Snell. The on course performance is a wash.

You guys sound like all the people hating on PXG for their pricing. Not an exact comparison because of the total dollars but in the same vein.

It’s more data than you have ever had
Which emblem do you want on your 3 star mb or Japanese ?
Your decision $52 or $32 u decide

Why not test the Prov1x vs other balls?

Nice test. Basically these balls are very very close in performance.

For me, accuracy is more important than distance. So based on the data I would say that the Pro VI, is the real winner here. However, having said that, the Pro VI’s advantage is only very marginally better on balance. If Driver distance is your main criteria I see how one might feel different, it is subjective.

So one needs to ask themselves does Pro v’s small marginal advantage, plus the cache of playing a Pro VI, warrant paying the hefty premium that Titleist charges?

Well, no, for me at least, the cost sure doesn’t. You see I am not a touring pro. Titleist doesn’t give me balls for free nor do they pay me the big endorsement dollars.

I have played Pro V’s off and on for years. I have been gaming the Snell Ball exclusively for the last 3 years. This test just reinforces the wisdom of my current ball selection. Like to see how the Snell Red would match up.

Keep up the good work!!!

Prov’s are only 35.99/dozen (buy 3, 4th free). I’m still going to try these Snell balls anyway, but the article seems biased if it doesn’t include Titleist pricing properly

Personally, I think you have to leave price out of the equation and rank them solely on performance. Then you let the consumer look at the price difference and determine whether that marginal performance difference is worth the cost in their book. Snell was always going to win if price was a factor.

I tried the original Snell My Tour golf ball and didn’t find it to my liking. Many of the reviews for this ball aligned it directly against the Titleist Pro V1, personally I thought it to be more like the Pro V1* thus too firm and clicky for my tastes.
The headline price looks attractive but when you take into account out going models from the big player’s, the price difference is much smaller. Fully stocked with 2016 Pro V1’s and 2017 Chrome Soft balls for next season using this technique.

Have you done durability tests on the balls as well?

Does the Snell Ball come in yellow? Seniors love yellow because we see it so much better. The Titleist AVX comes in yellow and it’s a really good Urethane covered ball, albeit pricey. TaylorMade’s new Project a comes in yellow and at around $30 or so it’s a worthy Urethane covered competitor. Srixon’s Q Star Tour is a great Urethane covered ball which is $26-29 and it will be in yellow mid-year. I haven’t had a 143mph ball speed in years, and most golfers don’t, so I don’t pay much attention to the numbers when they are as close as Snell and Titleist. Titleist has the best quality control in the business and, in my book, that’s an equalizer to .25 yards distance. So, does Snell’s wonderful new ball come in yellow?

Coming from a Titleist loyalist, I love the new Black MTB. I played the first generation MTB as well. This one is that much better. It spins well and just flat out performs. It should be a no-brainer that since Dean worked with the original ProV1, he is going to put some of the same engineering into the Snell ball. So it should be no surprise to anyone that they perform nearly identical. At a lower cost … c’mon … you should find more Snell balls now in the woods than ProV1’s.
I will continue to play the Snell ball … it’s a great ball that everyone should at least try out if you haven’t already.

Yeah, so spinning a 6 iron only 4,000 RPM’s but you hit it 4 yards further???? Not a win, because you won’t be able to stop your iron shot on the green. An extra 400 RPM’s helps but still not enough and the reason for the slight drop in distance I’d presume. I feel like distance is too heavily weighted.

In any case, a 6 iron should spin about 6,000rpms, so I’m guessing the 6-iron used actually had a 5 iron loft and 5 irons is where high handicappers should go with a hybrid because they “generally” don’t have the club head speed to propel the ball high enough and apply enough spin for green stopping control.

Negligible difference, some savings. Titleist more accurate off the driver, Snell more accurate on the 6 -iron, and Titleist more accurate on the wedge… Snell wins… huh? I know you’ve worked hard to break it down into one equation with a result for all, but I think it’s time to go beyond, and classify results by handicap brackets, like 5 hdcp and under, 6 -15 hdcp, 15+ hdcp. It could state the Snell is best for low handicappers, but the Titleist is better for high handicappers. But at this point, we just don’t know.

Also, everyone have a custom fit 6 iron with the right shaft? Custom fit driver? Custom fit wedge? Those factors affect spin heavily. No indication otherwise, and no indication on the brand either. It just doesn’t make sense to evaluate the performance of a golf ball with clubs that are not optimized for the player. Why you ask? Because it will skew the numbers. Put a ping i200 in my hands with a regular shaft and it goes too high and spins too much for me. Put a Callaway Apex MB with X shaft in a 20 hdcps hands and no spin and low flight.

Valiante effort, but you missed the mark in my honest opinion.

(10 hdcp) I’ve played Snell for over a year and I loved them. Just got the new Reds. They feel ‘harder’ than the original, and I’m hitting it longer. I still think the ProV1s and Kirklands have better, softer feel around the greens. I’m still figuring out the distances. At $30/box, it doesn’t hurt my feelings as much when they go sailing out of bounds. I’m very happy with Snell for the price and I’ll stick with them. Thanks MyGolfSpy for a terrific website.

May have asked this before, but it would be possible to publish all of the raw data for this (and other comparisons). As a data junkie, it would be interesting to take a deeper dive into the numbers.

I’ve been playing the MTB since it came out. But as a tinkerer, I’ve tried most of the new balls as released – ProV1, Callaway, Bridgestone, Volvik, Wilson, etc. They are all great balls, but I keep returning to the MTB.

Why? The article hit it right on the head – CONFIDENCE! After just 5-6 holes, you KNOW what the Snell ball will do. It feels right, it rolls right, it stops right. Ultimately trustable. The new black is even more of the same. Short game and putting are my strength – you can trust the MTB on the greens to roll consistent and true.

Is there any way you could add a 50 yard shot to this test using a 56 degree wedge so you could see spin numbers? Maybe even a 25 yard shot over a bunker or something?

I’ve been playing Vice Pro balls for the past season. Can’t tell the difference between those and Pro V1, except for the price. How does Vice compare to Snell?

With todays tour quality golf balls being at pretty much the allowable limits of the USGA & R&A, their performance are pretty much the same regardless of manufacturer. With that in mind, it all comes down to price and Snell balls are quite a good deal for new balls (used balls are even a better deal).

I was not chosen by GolfSpy to take part in this test so I did my own testing. While all the numbers here support my own research it was very important for me to have the confidence in deciding what ball to use in getting the best score and most fun and performance. The mental side of this made it an easy choice-Snell. My confidence level rose while using the Snell ball. It performed surprisingly well in all facets for me. I guess the proof is in the pudding, er, ball.

Good read, thanks. Is this to say the MTB blk is supposed to be the equal to the ProV1? So were does the MTB red fit in, is it supposed to be the equal to the ProV1X?

What about the accuracy? It’s not mentioned outside of the graphics, but it seems the Pro V1 has an advantage there….

I just bought 8 doz ProV’s during their 4 for 3 promo at $35 doz.
I stocked up for the year. The net difference is “only” $8 dz compared to Snell’s quantity discounts. Others, i.e. Srixon, B’stone, Callaway, are similarly discounted to the $25-30 range.

That said, Snell’s performance is pretty impressive. (As are those mentioned above.)
Unless one is tied up in brand loyalty, it is tough to justify paying a premium price for any other ball. Snell has all you need.

I am a 4 handicapper. Have not tried Snell. I did try the Vice pro and while the distance was identical, there was not enough spin with wedges, causing some of the shots to be 15-20 feet longer…the difference of making the putt vs not… Anyone know if Snell compares to Vice, which felt harder as well?

To me these balls are fantastic … despite whether you opt for the Red or the Black is a no brainer .! Same / marginal performance difference .
Durability of the old MTB was phenomenal ..& I do not see that changing with the new offering .
Being here in the UK , not many guys tee this ball up , but once your playing partners see how this compares everyone wants to know about it ..
At between £ 15 – £ 18 / dozen of a price difference it makes sense to play this ball …
I am a convert ….let’s hope many others do likewisr to reduce the profits of Titleist / Taylor Made / Callaway .
Regards Steven

I’ve been playing Snell for a couple years now. The MTB is noticeably better in performance and durability. The cost savings makes it a no brainer.

Sorry forgot to add you need a Canadian retailer for your balls Mr. Snell.

Are there any thoughts to compare the Snell balls to the new Calloway chrome?

Goes to prove you are only paying for the name. If ping still had a golf ball they would be right up there with prov1 and Taylor made balls. So it’s nice to see a little competition. The price will only come down when the consumer stops buying .

How could the average golfer justify playing a ball that is twice as expensive with almost identical playing results. Common sense should cause Snell balls to become a much more common appearance at every course. Thank you Dean Snell for producing a great golf ball for the masses!!

I have been playing the Snell MTB for 2 seasons now and have been extremely happy. The ball is equal to all the other Tour level balls I’ve tried, but for almost half the price. I love them!!!

4000 RPM for a six iron shot?!? What iron brand were you using and what are the peak heights of those shots? it’s going to be tough to hold a green unless the shots are coming in steep.

Seems the distance averages of the 6 irons shots is a lot higher than the distance averages of the sand wedge and driver shots. I don’t see many people with 143mph ball speed with a driver hitting a 6 iron 180 yards unless the lofts are super low (Taylormade M4 irons for example).

I have played the Snell MTB since it`s release and will continue going forward. I am convinced it is a better ball.

Been playing the original MTB since it came out and this only confirms that the Snell ball(s) are comparable to any tour quality ball at a much lower price point. Testing their new offerings (Black and Red) now and find them to be better than the original, granted with limited testing due to horrible weather in New England. So far the Red spins slightly more on shorter shots with a quicker stopping, but it’s only really noticeable on perfectly struck shots. More testing required but either ball is a terrific choice for those wanting tour quality golf balls at a lower price point. Titleist and Callaway (both very good balls) need to rethink their sponsorship models if it results in $20 increased price over the Snell balls. Suggest getting the test packs to try them out.

Played ProV1X for past 7 years and tried the Snell MTB Black. It is as long or longer than the ProV1. It is more durable, doesn’t scuff or nick like a ProV1 and it is $20 cheaper per dozen. Being a 12 handicap, I don’t hit them all down the middle. The major irritant with ProV1’s is that they are NOT that durable and seem to lose distance over a round. Snell seems to maintain performance thru several rounds where ProV’s lose over time. For me, I have finally found an affordable replacement for the ProV1’s. Its the MTB Black for me. NOTE: I have tried them all….. Callaway, TM, Srixon, Oncore, etc….. Snell outplays all of them and 1/2 the price and lasts longer as well. BIG BANG for the proverbial buck.

I’m a Snell convert, having played the MTB ball since it’s roll-out. Its every bit the ball the Pro-V1 is, and in my view, softer off the face of both driver and putter. I’m testing the newest iterations now, and I have little doubt they will be strong performers as well. Price aside (and that’s saying a lot !), Dean has done a great job in bringing a high performing, durable, and technically advanced ball to market.

I received my test pack on Saturday and as soon as it quits snowing around here, I will try out the new Snells. I liked the old model, so I’m sure I will like these as well. I do know the one thing that will keep me coming back is the handwritten thank you from the man himself…Dean Snell.

When I run out of Kirklands, Snell MTB’s are top of my list.

I have a lot of Kirklands right now, though.

I haven’t tried then because their business model only makes sense for Americans not Canadians.

The extra costs make it not worth it. Especially when I can go to golftown who routinely has premium balls example srixon z star on sale.

I don’t want to have to buy 6 dozen at a time. The savings are low.
It’s great that it’s a comparable premium ball to the prov1 but then again so I’d the Taylormade and the Srixon etc etc

i am an old guy-82- and still play to an 8 index from the shorter 6000 yd tees. I cannot tell much difference in any ball i play. They all go about 200-220 yds off the tee and all feel just fine. can anyone guess what the real cost of a golf ball is , without the burden of overhead and advertising? Probably about a quarter?????

I currently play pro v1x. What is the corresponding Snell model? Red? Yellow? Thanks.

I’ve been playing the original MTB for years & really like the performance. I cannot wait to see how the 4 piece MTB stacks up!

I am a 9 HDC player and play 3 times a week.
I’ve played PRO V1 balls for years and thought i’d try the Snell MTB RED balls. Sorry, no comparison! Snell ball feels too hard and did not have the spin as promised. Usually pay about the same price for PRO V when on promotion.

My Snell Black’s arrived a couple weeks ago but it has been too cold to play …………….. come on warm weather!

I love the Snell balls. The golfING world has always needed a top shelf ball for less money. I have played pro v1 balls since they were released, but I try new balls out all the time. There are so many good balls out now it’s insane. For me I still game a pro v1 because it does what I want it to do and I have a chemistry with it. However, the snell mtb is a great ball and if I hadn’t have been using pro v1 for nearly 20 years maybe I would switch

I have been playing the original Snell MTB for two seasons now and they are as good as any ball out there. I hope to get my hands on the black and red soon to test, but have some left over stock to play first. I used to play all kinds of tour balls as most offer the same performance, it all depends on price. The advantage of the Snell or any other direct to consumer ball is the price, its not that it is better than the Pro V1, it’s that it is half the cost with similar or same performance. The same goes for Vice, Oncore, or even Kirkland, if they all cost $52/doz, then what would be the advantage. This test doesn’t show the Pro V1 is not the best best, rather it is not the best ball you can play for the price. do your self a favor and try the Snell and take a honest unbiased test of it, and you will find little to no difference in performance. You can do everything you need with it. I have no issues fighting it high, low, or moving it either direction. Finally, it has more than enough spin to stop on the green from any distance. If you are telling yourself it is inferior in any way, then you are just not looking at the results through unbiased lenses.

I’ve used the Snell my tour ball and as a 15 handicapper I was unable to see any difference between the two. I am unable to see any real difference in any of the tour balls out there and for that reason I generally will play Snell our the project a’s because of the price point.

After seeing the test data, I’d like to quote Owen Wilson:

Wow.

It’s nice to see a few reasonably priced options perform as good if not better than the primo priced options. Between Snell, Costco and Bridgestone’s promotions, I don’t plan on spending more than $25 – $35 per dozen ever again!

i have played both the new snell red and black. they are great balls for the price. are there better balls? sure, but at $31/dozen the list of better balls is very short.

FYI The sand wedge graphic says 6 iron.

I was injured last year and played only 4 rounds of golf. However, I had the chance to play the Snell MTB the previous year and found no appreciable difference between that and the Pro V1. Although, I had my first double eagle while playing the Snell MTB. I’m looking forward to trying the new Snell ball this year.

Did anything about each golf ball’s relative durability come to light in this test? I’m really impressed with how durable ProV1s are; a single one seems to hold up nicely through multiple rounds as long as I keep it in play.

It seems like both golf balls are very close performance-wise, which is eye-opening given the price difference. If the Snell balls are also as durable as the Titleists, it adds another dimension to the comparison.

Sounds like with the price of the Snell balls being that good, it’s a no brainer when the two tested have similar results. I have a dozen of the Reds in my truck waiting to be spanked on the arse. Looking forward to the results and if they perform as well as they are priced, I’ll become a fanboy!