TITLEIST PRO V1 (vs) SNELL MTB BLACK
Golf Balls

TITLEIST PRO V1 (vs) SNELL MTB BLACK

TITLEIST PRO V1 (vs) SNELL MTB BLACK

INDEPENDENT & UNBIASED

MyGolfSpy accepts $0 advertising dollars from any of the major golf manufacturers. We believe in always putting #ConsumerFirst.

10

Hours
Researched

658

Shots
Hit

25.9m

Readers

2

Products
Considered

In our original test of direct-to-consumer golf balls, the Snell My Tour Ball stood well-above the rest. That shouldn’t have been too surprising. While not everybody knew the Snell Golf, within the industry, Dean Snell is a longtime household name in golf ball design. Snell Golf was an extension of Dean’s work with the big guys. This difference was that with Snell Golf, Dean was doing it on his own; producing tour level balls at prices well below those of the big OEMs.

For 2018, Snell has expanded its offerings in the tour ball space. What started with the Snell MTB (My Tour Ball) has now evolved into the familiar two-ball line strategy, consisting of the 3-piece MTB Black and the 4-piece MTB Red.

Snell has long been seen throughout the pages of MyGolfSpy, and today we’re bringing you the results of our recent test of Snell’s MTB Black against the industry-leading Titleist Pro V1.

Face

HOW WE TESTED

  • Snell MTB Black and Titleist Pro V1 golf balls were tested head to head.
  • Testers used the same driver, 6 iron, and sand wedge for all shots.
  • Testers rotated between clubs until 12-14 “good” shots were hit with each.
  • Club order was randomized for every tester.
  • Ten golfers with handicaps ranging from 0-10 and driver swing speeds between 85 and 120 mph participated in this test.
  • Gross mishits were eliminated and are not included in the shot counts.
  • Remaining outliers were identified using Median Absolute Deviation, and dropped before calculation of the final averages.
  • Ball Data was recorded using a Foresight GCQuad Launch Monitor.

*The GCQuad accurately characterizes initial launch conditions including ball speed, launch angle, and spin rates, however; dimple patterns differences between balls can have an impact on downrange values such as peak height and descent angle. For this reason, the comparative Total Distance numbers provided should be considered reasonable estimates.

THE DATA

DRIVER OBSERVATIONS

  • The Snell MTB Black produced marginally higher ball speeds (.25 mph) than the Titleist Pro V1. This accounts for the marginally longer total distance.
  • Launch angles for both balls were nearly identical
  • Both the Snell and the Pro V1 had similar launch characteristics, including spin rate.

Snell vs. Titleist - 6 Iron

ClubDistanceAccuracySpinLaunchBall Speed
Snell MTB Black 6 Iron183.02 yds10.35 yds4,004 rpm18.66 deg117.94 mph
Titleist Pro V1 6 Iron179.35 yds11.70 yds4,424 rpm17.94 deg117.60 mph

6 IRON OBSERVATIONS

  • 6-iron averages suggest more significant differences than we saw with the driver.
  • The Snell MTB black launched higher with less spin than the Pro-V1.  It is important to note that the Pro-V1 has been re-engineered for 2018 to have a more penetrating launch.
  • While ball speeds were near the same, the longer average total distance for the Snell can be attributed to the decreased spin rate. The Pro V1 spun approximately 400 RPM higher than the Snell.
  • Both the Snell and Pro V1 proved to be almost identically accurate, with the Snell MTB Black about 1 yard closer to the target line than the Pro V1.

Snell vs. Titleist - Sand Wedge

ClubDistanceAccuracySpinLaunchBall Speed
Snell MTB Black Sand Wedge88.71 yds3.45 yds9,876 rpm31.75 deg77.06 mph
Titleist Pro V1 Sand Wedge89.55 yds3.08 yds10,102 rpm31.31 deg77.65 mph

SAND WEDGE OBSERVATIONS

  • As we’d expect at higher lofts, the averages suggest minimal ball speed differences.
  • The Titleist Pro V1 produced marginally lower launch, but appreciably higher spin rates.

QUAD

THE VERDICT

The data collected during this test suggests that the Snell MTB Black and Titleist Pro V1 offer similar performance. Differences while often minimal are most pronounced when comparing spin across irons and wedges.

While we can understand better players preferring a higher-spinning ball, particularly as shots move closer to the green, the most significant difference between two models tested is not found in performance, but in price.

The Titleist Pro V1 currently retails at $52/dozen; while the Snell MTB sells for a whopping $20 cheaper at $31.99/dozen.  Snell also offers volume discounts. When you purchase 6 dozen – the price drops to $27.33/dozen.

6 Dozen = $27.33/ea.

That’s a 52% savings.

Your Thoughts

Have you tried a Snell ball yet?  Which one and what did you think?

CutBawlz

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS


Amount

Frequency

For You

For You

Irons
Apr 24, 2024
PXG Irons: Model By Model
Putters
Apr 23, 2024
PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
News
Apr 23, 2024
Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Our mission is #ConsumerFirst. We are here to help educate and empower golfers. We want you to get the most out of your money, time and performance. That means providing you with equipment reviews you can trust, as well as honest reporting on the latest issues affecting the game today. #PowerToThePlayer

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Driver Ping G30 Hybrids PXG 0317
3/4 IRON PXG 0311XF 5-GW Srixon Z 565
SW PXG 0317 LW PXG 0311
Putter EVNROLL  
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      CH

      4 years ago

      I have the MTB Blacks and love them.. These balls perform as well as Pro V1 in all conditions. They stop on a dime and can be worked in the air. Best ball on the market right now and at an unbelievable price.

      Reply

      Bill

      6 years ago

      Played the original MTB and liked it but thought it spun a bit much off the driver. Also noticed that the <150 yard shots don't check .
      Putted well and was happy to keep Dean Snell busy..Then the new balls came out and found they were a worthy replacement. Handled wind better and stopped marginally better (the Red,that is. Have the blacks on the way this week). It's been a number of years since I was a single digit handicap and the Snell is a solid ball for me at this point. The Black actually sounds like a better fit for me although I really like the Red…Nothing against Titleist but $16-20 more a dozen makes the MTB an easy choice at this point.

      Reply

      Bill

      6 years ago

      Update, since I played the MTB Black… Both balls are very good and I will play both. I’d like to see the side by side results of both in testing.
      Tee to green and putting, I like them both as much as any ball.
      I don’t compress the ball like a pro with my short irons so I always play for a little roll out so it’s not dramatically different as any top dollar ball for me.
      Absolutely the right ball for me.

      Reply

      Tim D

      6 years ago

      I have played the new Snell balls and honestly, I like the OnCore Elixr better. While the Elixr is a little more expensive ($35 vs $31), it lasts a full round. II had to replace the Snell ball after about 9 holes each time played with it. The Elixr also seems like it is less effected by the wind.

      Reply

      Mike

      6 years ago

      I’ve found >1,000 excellent condition premium balls over the past few years, so many that I’ve sold off a bunch. Haven’t bought balls since 2008 & I play frequently. Couldn’t imagine laying out ~$50 for a dozen balls.

      Reply

      808nation

      6 years ago

      Fan of Snell MTB balls, have not tried the newest balls as I still many dozens, but you definitely can’t go wrong with the cost and performance being top notch.

      Reply

      JohnQ_2025

      6 years ago

      Where are the Snells manufactured? I’ll pay a little extra for made in the USA. Also, no one should pay retail for Pro V1s. There are many ways to get them cheaper.

      Reply

      Alex

      6 years ago

      Thumbs up. Me too. Bridgestone, Callaway, and Titleist all offer Made in the USA ball models.

      Dave

      6 years ago

      I used to play Pro V1/V1x as well but tried the Kirkland 4-piece and Vice Pro+ last year and I find no reason to pay more for Titleist. I’ll be playing the Snell Black and Red this spring (along with OnCore Elixr and Cut Blue and Grey) to check those out. So many affordable urethane balls to choose from (right now the Vice Pro+ is my go to ball) but I’ll just keep trying different ones out to see which one fits my game the best :)

      Reply

      Mackey mo

      6 years ago

      I have been playing MTB since it came out. I play because I believe that it is the best ball on the market. The same guy designed both balls but he designed this one most recently. I have had 2 holes in one with Snell balls and the biggest issue I have with them is giving away 4-5 dozen per year to curious golfers. Believe in the Dean!!

      Reply

      Paul

      5 years ago

      Wow, I am looking for a ball and the cost of lost Titleist balls is too much for me.

      I don’t like the rocks that are out there as well.

      I think I will try the Snell ball. The price is right.

      Reply

      golfmann

      6 years ago

      Would very much like to see a comparison using the new Snell RED!

      Reply

      Spongy5

      6 years ago

      Strickly comes down to price

      Reply

      Is accuracy really a thing when comparing golf balls?

      I mean, golfers are so inconsistent a ball finishing 15 yards or 17 yards offline is down to the swing that was put on it not the ball.

      Its like comparing two snooker balls pink and black and saying on average after testing the pink missed by slight more than the black (Even though they are identical) the difference being the the players attempt, same with golf balls, if i swing well ANY ball goes where i want it to… ball do not just go offline for no reason they have 1 side.

      Reply

      Carl

      6 years ago

      I use Snell golf balls. The performance is on par in my opinion to my old Pro v’s and much cheaper.
      I don’t think they last as long but performance wise they’re spot on.
      Great indeph review. Ty

      Reply

      mackdaddy

      6 years ago

      I played the MTB for six dozen balls. They played great! The only issue was they only lasted about 9 holes before I had to take the ball out of play. Any wedge struck full or even 3/4 would scuff the ball and pull small threads that looked like dreadlocks.

      Reply

      Romeopapazulu

      6 years ago

      I played the Mack daddy wedges for a while until I got tired of the spaghetti shreds hanging on the ball after every full wedge shot. It was more wedge related than ball related.
      I’d like to see how that affects the ball flight. Maybe I could take dime sized pieces of scotch brite pads, glue them to some balls and take them to the simulator to see what was happening to all those years.

      Reply

      Derek Myob

      4 years ago

      Dean Snell DID NOT “DESIGN” Pro V1, he worked for Titleist Golf Ball R&D and worked on the project with many others including scientists, engineers, chemists, and technicians, and he went to work at TaylorMade before the Launch of the FIRST model. Now he doesn’t make anything, he pays a company in Asia to make golf balls, then he imports them, and distributes them.
      Do you really think the same R&D goes into making those products? And after all the American workers who have lost their jobs to overseas manufacturing companies, I’d rather pay more to an American company.
      Also, take a look at the numbers when the balls are tested with machines that can repeat the same swing speed, launch angle, club speed, ball speed, and spin, there’s a lot of room for error when people are testing balls or clubs as compared to reliable equipment made exclusively for testing golf balls and golf clubs.

      Reply

      Paul Wharton

      4 years ago

      If they are only lasting 9 Holes they need to be a lot cheaper than $31 a dozen.

      Reply

      Andrew

      6 years ago

      MGS-
      I’d really like to know what the descent angles were here- that’s very important to green-holding, as we all know.

      Great article.

      Reply

      Johnny Penso

      6 years ago

      Given the data above I can’t imagine they’d be much apart, a degree at most. Not enough to make any difference.

      Reply

      Michael Constantine

      6 years ago

      Or, for $1.00 per ball I’ll continue to play Lost Golf Balls dot Com ProV1X 2016 4AAAA.

      Reply

      DaveyD

      6 years ago

      The Snell Red and Black MTB balls haven’t shown up on the Canadian website. Hopefully, they’ll get there soon.

      Reply

      Brian K

      6 years ago

      Sorry. It is my mistake. New version is not there yet.

      DaveyD

      6 years ago

      The Snell Red and Black MTB balls haven’t shown up on the Canadian website. Hopefully, they’ll get ther soon.

      Reply

      Anonymous

      6 years ago

      Getting time to rethink price points over at Titleist headquarters

      Reply

      Django

      6 years ago

      One would think, but honestly don’t think It will happen until they see meaningful loss of market share start to happen. Titleist (or any other top ball maker) will likely acquire Snell(or other direct to consumer ball company) before it becomes too pricey and quietly dismantle the company and take the IP.. assuming it is something novel that the ball company does not know already.

      Reply

      Birddieputt

      6 years ago

      I’ve played the Snell MTB a number of times and liked the performance. I just received the “trial pack”; with both the black and red and will start my own testing tomorrow.
      To me, the Pro-V1 has always been overpriced. I usually play the Bridgestone 330- RXS and think it’s comparable to the Snell MTB.
      These test results don’t surprise me, especially with the driver.
      For the money, I can’t justify the extra $20.00/doz just to tell my buddies “well, I play the Pro-V1”.

      Reply

      Jason Edwards

      6 years ago

      This ball is so responsive to every type of shot that needs to be hit. I do think the driver spin is still a bit high though. I shot two of my best rounds of the year recently with this ball and will continue to game it. If I had to sum this up with one sentence that sentence would be. The snell mtb black golf ball performs as if Titleist were to make a ProV1/X golf ball. For me it had some of the characteristics of the regular ProV1 and some of the characteristics of the ProV1X combined into one golf ball. Cant really go wrong there in my opinion.

      Reply

      Spitfisher

      6 years ago

      I would have preferred to see a test including an 8 iron along with the 6 iron and wedge. Also going to all that trouble you should have done all 4 versions prov1 x and red/black

      The driver test & results was to be expected with those balls, hell even a 3 year old , water logged pinnacle gold would have been close to those numbers.

      i have said all along premium balls should be judged from 135 yards and in.

      Reply

      Buknastee

      6 years ago

      I’ve been playing the MTB for about 2 years. I prefer the duller whiteness of the former generation MTB over the bright white of the new MTB Red. However, I did get the 2nd hole-in-one of golfing life a couple of weeks ago with the MTB Red. So, I guess I’ll just have to get used to the optics of the latest gen MTB.

      Reply

      Putmedownforasix

      6 years ago

      Proof of the power of the Titleist brand is the crazy comments defending their pricing.

      I like the Snell ball can’t tell the difference…in the spirit of David taking on Goliath — just ordered 6 dozen Snell Blacks.

      Beyond nice margins, Titleist does exhaustive testing/quality control ..it comes from their legacy…wound balls were tricky business. Solid construction does not need the level of testing on every ball. Dean Snell ex-Titleist Pro V1 engineer figured that out and selling direct to consumer was the way to go. And, spends too much money on sponsoring tour pros. Titleist will be forced to change all of above…soon.

      Reply

      JasonA

      6 years ago

      This is one test where the Foresight GCQuad is not a great tool. An important part of golf ball design is aerodynamics. The GCQuad just estimates this.

      And the only radar in open range will provide data on how the ball actually flies (vs. just launches)

      Reply

      Some Guy

      6 years ago

      The aerodynamics of premium balls aren’t dramatically different from one to the next. This the reason Trackman is able to do ball conversion.

      Reply

      JasonA

      6 years ago

      Sure, but most of the MGS results are down to few percent here and there. If those last few % does not matter to you, this is probably not the website you should be on :-)

      And in this regard the Trrackman ball conversion is just as useless as GC Quad for ball performance **testing**. It is just an estimation.

      BTW anecdotally I have seen different headwind / crosswind performance – and would love to know if this is truth or imagination.

      Johnny Penso

      6 years ago

      ^^ I think you have it backwards. If the last few% don’t matter to you this is exactly the place you should be.

      Fingerling

      6 years ago

      Hi, just wandering… Are refurbished ball so much worse than new ones? I’m new to the game, and lose quite a few balls during the round ;). I’m from Europe so Snell balls cost quite a lot when I add shipping. I’m currently playing a refurbished Srixon Soft feel, which comes to about 60c (0.74$) per ball, snells comes to 2.55€ (3.14$) per ball… Snell UK don’t deliver to EU…

      Reply

      TimoT

      6 years ago

      Don’t buy refurbished balls. You can just buy cheaper new balls. The Titleist DtTrusoft is a durable balls with adequate spun for an affordable price. It is also very durable. The Taylormade Project A, Bridgestone e6, and Callaway Super hot are all fine and dandy balls. Just buy the same ball and learn how it plays. When you start playing better than bogey golf you can try premium balls to try and shave a couple more strokes.

      Reply

      JasonA

      6 years ago

      Few issues with refurbished balls – (1) the painted cover does not perform as well as original cover for both spin & wear (2) if a lake ball, water is absorbed and distance suffers (not a huge amount but definitively happens)

      I can recommend seedgolf.com SD-15 COUNTRY MILE for those losing a few balls. Very good soft feel, genuinely long distance, behaves fine around the green and 0.83 euro (€10/doz) each brand new.

      The Seed Golf equivalent to Pro V1 (SD-01) was well reviewed.

      Reply

      Putmedownforasix

      6 years ago

      Hi Fingerling,

      Ask yourself: Would you like to play a big money game with your buddies where everyone gets a new sleeve of new balls. But, you have to soak yours in water for 2-3 weeks before match.

      That’s equivalent of refurbished balls….at their very best.

      Cheers,
      PMDFAS

      Reply

      Alex

      6 years ago

      A little disappointed in MGS on this one. Not with the test but with the conclusion. I personally don’t even like pro v 1’s but I would call the data too close to declare a winner. If price was the deciding factor that should be clearly stated. Also I think the other comments are fair that virtually no one pays $52 a dozen for pro vs. Could have called them virtually equal, with the Snell generally saving $1 a ball….

      Reply

      Anonymous

      6 years ago

      I’ve been using the SNELL ball for a year (and ProV1’s) and really can’t find much difference! SNELL is way less expensive and delivers to your home. Its a pretty good ball!

      Reply

      Jerry

      6 years ago

      I wonder about consistent quality. Out of a dozen balls, will every smell ball perform the same. I am certain the Titleist will. That’s why I play Prov1x.

      Reply

      Ryan

      6 years ago

      This is a great test that once again shows that the price demanded by Titleist cant be justified, unless you are strictly looking for brand.

      Also trying being in Canada where a Doz ProV1 set you back $64 BEFORE TAX

      Reply

      Todd

      6 years ago

      They pay huge dollars for pros to play their ball…they would play a range ball if the money was right.

      Reply

      JohnQ-2025

      6 years ago

      And it didn’t work out so well for Bubba.

      Reply

      Anonymous

      6 years ago

      I’ve played pro vs for some time and last year I tried the mtb and they’re extremely comparable with in my opinion a small difference in spin and around the greens…happy to game either ball

      Reply

      Anonymous

      6 years ago

      The only difference for me is that I hit the Snell straighter and a little bit longer off the T. Other than that they are the same for my game.

      Reply

      Anonymous

      6 years ago

      I’m almost a +2 so I’ll do some testing and post the results here. Interested to see. Def a value as a practice ball if they are similar!

      Reply

      Anonymous

      6 years ago

      Am I the only one that looks at the local shop for Tournament range/practice or overrun balls? After doing a ball fitting (hold your comments, ) it came down to Chrome Soft or ProV1. I have the most accurate and consistent distance (personally) with PV1. Just spend the $20/dzn and mark them up how you want to IMO. But figure out your swing speed and the TYPE of swing you have as well first. My .02

      Reply

      Ed R

      6 years ago

      Thank you for the excellent reviews. I would like to see a comparison between either of these and Vice Pro or Pro Plus. I am not a pro golfer by any means but single digit handicap, played on college team a long time ago and have started using Vice and find them as good for me. I would just like to see how others felt. Again thanks for all the great reviews.

      Reply

      SV677

      6 years ago

      I played the original MTB and liked it. I really didn’t notice a difference between it and other tour balls and I save $12 to $16 per dozen. I have never been a fan of the Pro Vs even though they are good balls.
      I have not tried the new Snell balls, but with the minimal differences indicated in the testing I see no reason to pay more for the same performance.

      Reply

      Jonathan Rand

      6 years ago

      Guys and Gals Try the OnCore Elixr Ball . Better then the Prov1x
      and Crome soft which I have been using . I am a 4 handicap and 70 years old with a club head speed of 90-94. Ball is longer by 20 yards anda half to 1 whole club longer! Great around the greens for chipping and great feel on putts!!

      Reply

      I was taking your post 100% seriously and thinking gotta try these until you threw in the 20 yards longer line.

      Any claim of 20 yards longer for drivers or balls is just rubbish, no one since probably the TM BURNER AND CALLAWAY WARBIRD (ORIGINALS) has ever made either a club or ball that ACTUALLY added 20 yards.

      Reply

      LABillyboy

      6 years ago

      Please, nobody charges $52 a box for Pro V’s… my local golf course sells them for $45… so versus $32 for Snell’s it’s basically $1 a ball. If you care, you can hit the Titleist semi annual sale and get down to $36 a doz..

      When green fees are $55 spending an extra $1-3 a round on balls is insignificant… I’ll stick with Titleist or TM or Callaway (balls I’m playing now)… I can just buy them at the course when I need more… much easier.

      Reply

      TimoT

      6 years ago

      My green fees are under $15 for an afternoon round. Also, I haven’t bought a ball since the first dozen I bought when I started because I have found over 800 balls as I play this past year. I would not ever pay premium processing for balls. Even though I have dozens of Chrome Soft, ProVs, and TP5s… I play the Titleist DtTrusoft because it seems to be a hell of a lot more durable. Price matters.

      Reply

      Anonymous

      6 years ago

      I just ordered mine and are due to arrive tomorrow. They also now have a three piece urethane ball.

      Reply

      DJANGO

      6 years ago

      I have gamed the Pro V1 for years and play to a 2 HDCP. Received my sample pack of Red and Black MTB and here is my feedback.

      Played the Red for 3 holes and did not like the spin on 150yds and in, the Red was solid off the driver.

      Switched to the Black for the rest of the round. I really like this ball off the driver, irons, and putting. Durability was better than Pro V1.

      The Black MTB did have less “check” on chip shots and rolled out a bit more, just need to some practice to adjust.

      One difference that causing hesitation to make a long-term switch is the performance in the wind. Yesterday, the wind was consistently 10-15mph with gusts around 20mph. Pro V1’s seem to handle these conditions better with less “balloon” effect, however, it could be attributed to early season ball striking as well!

      Overall, great ball.

      Reply

      Gmoney

      6 years ago

      What about the Red spin from 150yds and in did you not like? Too much spin?

      Reply

      M. Parsons

      6 years ago

      Getting ready to place my order for the MTB test pack.

      Reply

      MiCool

      6 years ago

      Unless your breaking 70 from the tips, you’ll ending up shooting just about the same with ‘found balls’. If these expensive balls are so great
      and straight , why do I find so many ‘O B’ or in the water,,,etc. ???
      Great article for those who think it’s the ball fault. Very informative research, keep up the great work.

      Reply

      George P.

      6 years ago

      You goobers that are claiming Titleist’s “Buy 3 Get 4” deal need to understand that it’s only a “PROMOTION”. Hello!!!! The comparison is for regular pricing. Therefore, the difference is a minimum $20 / dozen between the Snell MTB and Pro-V1. With there being very little difference between the two balls, the Snell MTB has been a real find for me. Awesome all-around high performance ball. Love it!!

      Reply

      Jordan

      6 years ago

      What about the feel between the two? Or the sound it makes while putting. That to me is more important than a few yards.

      Reply

      Mulligan1

      6 years ago

      Was a test done with the Prov”s ,Snell and the Vice balls? What about “refurbished” ball’s. I just got burned on some Callaway 5 piece refurbished sphere’s!

      Reply

      Nick

      6 years ago

      Where are you paying $52 a dozen? With the current 3 get 1 free deal you can get them for $36 a dozen on a “volume deal”. They are more expensive than Snell but not the exaggeration you portray in the article.

      Stop taking advertising money from Snell. The on course performance is a wash.

      You guys sound like all the people hating on PXG for their pricing. Not an exact comparison because of the total dollars but in the same vein.

      Reply

      Ron

      6 years ago

      The Titleist “deal” is a twice a year limited time offer. The Snell price is all year long. The price difference is significant.

      Reply

      Sean

      6 years ago

      Still, while msrp is $52 no retailer is selling for more than $48. Shady part in msg.

      I love snell mtb but prov1 ain’t a knack either.

      Chris

      6 years ago

      I buy the value packs from Snell. Buy 5 dozen get a dozen for free. Brings the cost down to under $27 a dozen.

      Andrew

      6 years ago

      MGS does not take advertising dollars from snell. If the V1 is so good (it is) then give Dean Snell a shot- he designed the original.

      Reply

      Thomas

      6 years ago

      It’s more data than you have ever had
      Which emblem do you want on your 3 star mb or Japanese ?
      Your decision $52 or $32 u decide

      Reply

      DL

      6 years ago

      Why not test the Prov1x vs other balls?

      Reply

      JonD

      6 years ago

      Nice test. Basically these balls are very very close in performance.

      For me, accuracy is more important than distance. So based on the data I would say that the Pro VI, is the real winner here. However, having said that, the Pro VI’s advantage is only very marginally better on balance. If Driver distance is your main criteria I see how one might feel different, it is subjective.

      So one needs to ask themselves does Pro v’s small marginal advantage, plus the cache of playing a Pro VI, warrant paying the hefty premium that Titleist charges?

      Well, no, for me at least, the cost sure doesn’t. You see I am not a touring pro. Titleist doesn’t give me balls for free nor do they pay me the big endorsement dollars.

      I have played Pro V’s off and on for years. I have been gaming the Snell Ball exclusively for the last 3 years. This test just reinforces the wisdom of my current ball selection. Like to see how the Snell Red would match up.

      Keep up the good work!!!

      Reply

      Mint Condition

      6 years ago

      Accuracy is so subjective to the delivery and strike location of a player. A fraction of a millimeter in strike location would easily explain any difference in accuracy between the two balls. Even with a massive data set, I’m sure the differences are within the margin of error.

      Reply

      LABillyboy

      6 years ago

      Unless you are Sergio (Tin Cup) Garcia… how many balls do you actually use in a round? I personally don’t go through more than 1 or 2 per round. It’s a $1 per ball difference… any decent course is a least $50 a round for green fees, so what’s an extra $2? Heck I’ve played the same Pro V for over 3 rounds in a row… Just play the ball you like best… even if you aren’t getting them free.

      Reply

      Andrew

      6 years ago

      I tend to go through a lot of balls. The courses I typically play are heavily wooded, and (no pine straw here, boys) past the first yard or so into the trees it’s a forest, so not easily nor feasibly found. I also don’t have the budget to play “decent” courses that are “at least $50 per round” more than once or twice a season, so cost is a (big) factor. That being said – my game benefits greatly from a urethane covered, tour quality ball. So- what am I to do? Spend my lunch money on a Titleist ball because it’s “only” $1 more per ball, or play a ball with essentially the same performance for less?

      Johnny Golf Nut

      6 years ago

      Prov’s are only 35.99/dozen (buy 3, 4th free). I’m still going to try these Snell balls anyway, but the article seems biased if it doesn’t include Titleist pricing properly

      Reply

      Mint Condition

      6 years ago

      Yes, that is a current promo for Titleist but this article will live a lot longer than that promotion. In terms of not dating itself, it needs to list the MSRP as they do for the price. I don’t think it is trying to be dishonest, but I get your point. Snell does run promos sometimes as well, but the ones listed in the article are their year around pricing.

      Reply

      LABillyboy

      6 years ago

      Nobody charges $52 a doz for Pro V’s… they are $45 everywhere around here in So Cal. in shops and at courses. A quick Google search finds them for $35.95 a doz. if you like buying online… So really not much of a price difference at all. worst case it’s $1 a ball… big deal.

      Johnny Penso

      6 years ago

      True, it is not a big deal. However, the performance difference is no big deal either. So why would one pay extra money for a different name on the golf ball? I can absolutely guarantee you that if the roles were reversed and the Titleist ball was $1 cheaper nobody would be playing the Snell ball even though the performance is identical.

      Reply

      Dave S

      6 years ago

      Personally, I think you have to leave price out of the equation and rank them solely on performance. Then you let the consumer look at the price difference and determine whether that marginal performance difference is worth the cost in their book. Snell was always going to win if price was a factor.

      Reply

      Dave

      6 years ago

      I know what you mean but I think all of the data is subject to the readers interpratation. I may choose distance over accuracy, lower launch angle, higher spin, or lower cost. I think if the numbers were not there most golfers would not choose snell over pro v1. So lower cost alone would not mean snell wins.

      Reply

      Ernie

      6 years ago

      I don’t think so. If price is all that matters, no one would play provs, or any tour balls. People would be buying bargain balls for 10$/sack.

      You have to look at everything, objectively.

      Reply

      Andrew

      6 years ago

      It’s not just price, or performance- vanity is a strong driver of this market. Snell balls just don’t have the same caché as “pro v1” in regular circles- many folks like to show off, or will gravitate towards something that has been shown off, without a whole lot of regard to actual, personal, performance.

      Bill

      6 years ago

      But price is a big part of the equation! Does a player need to spend almost $50/dz, when they can get the same performance out of a less expensive ball. I’m thinking that’s one of the main reasons they ran the comparison.

      Reply

      DaveMac

      6 years ago

      I tried the original Snell My Tour golf ball and didn’t find it to my liking. Many of the reviews for this ball aligned it directly against the Titleist Pro V1, personally I thought it to be more like the Pro V1* thus too firm and clicky for my tastes.
      The headline price looks attractive but when you take into account out going models from the big player’s, the price difference is much smaller. Fully stocked with 2016 Pro V1’s and 2017 Chrome Soft balls for next season using this technique.

      Reply

      Mark

      6 years ago

      Have you done durability tests on the balls as well?

      Reply

      Lou Body

      6 years ago

      Does the Snell Ball come in yellow? Seniors love yellow because we see it so much better. The Titleist AVX comes in yellow and it’s a really good Urethane covered ball, albeit pricey. TaylorMade’s new Project a comes in yellow and at around $30 or so it’s a worthy Urethane covered competitor. Srixon’s Q Star Tour is a great Urethane covered ball which is $26-29 and it will be in yellow mid-year. I haven’t had a 143mph ball speed in years, and most golfers don’t, so I don’t pay much attention to the numbers when they are as close as Snell and Titleist. Titleist has the best quality control in the business and, in my book, that’s an equalizer to .25 yards distance. So, does Snell’s wonderful new ball come in yellow?

      Reply

      Tanksfurnutin

      6 years ago

      The Snell “Red” comes in both white and yellow.

      Reply

      Golfinnut

      6 years ago

      Coming from a Titleist loyalist, I love the new Black MTB. I played the first generation MTB as well. This one is that much better. It spins well and just flat out performs. It should be a no-brainer that since Dean worked with the original ProV1, he is going to put some of the same engineering into the Snell ball. So it should be no surprise to anyone that they perform nearly identical. At a lower cost … c’mon … you should find more Snell balls now in the woods than ProV1’s.
      I will continue to play the Snell ball … it’s a great ball that everyone should at least try out if you haven’t already.

      Reply

      Weston

      6 years ago

      Yeah, so spinning a 6 iron only 4,000 RPM’s but you hit it 4 yards further???? Not a win, because you won’t be able to stop your iron shot on the green. An extra 400 RPM’s helps but still not enough and the reason for the slight drop in distance I’d presume. I feel like distance is too heavily weighted.

      In any case, a 6 iron should spin about 6,000rpms, so I’m guessing the 6-iron used actually had a 5 iron loft and 5 irons is where high handicappers should go with a hybrid because they “generally” don’t have the club head speed to propel the ball high enough and apply enough spin for green stopping control.

      Negligible difference, some savings. Titleist more accurate off the driver, Snell more accurate on the 6 -iron, and Titleist more accurate on the wedge… Snell wins… huh? I know you’ve worked hard to break it down into one equation with a result for all, but I think it’s time to go beyond, and classify results by handicap brackets, like 5 hdcp and under, 6 -15 hdcp, 15+ hdcp. It could state the Snell is best for low handicappers, but the Titleist is better for high handicappers. But at this point, we just don’t know.

      Also, everyone have a custom fit 6 iron with the right shaft? Custom fit driver? Custom fit wedge? Those factors affect spin heavily. No indication otherwise, and no indication on the brand either. It just doesn’t make sense to evaluate the performance of a golf ball with clubs that are not optimized for the player. Why you ask? Because it will skew the numbers. Put a ping i200 in my hands with a regular shaft and it goes too high and spins too much for me. Put a Callaway Apex MB with X shaft in a 20 hdcps hands and no spin and low flight.

      Valiante effort, but you missed the mark in my honest opinion.

      Reply

      Michael

      6 years ago

      (10 hdcp) I’ve played Snell for over a year and I loved them. Just got the new Reds. They feel ‘harder’ than the original, and I’m hitting it longer. I still think the ProV1s and Kirklands have better, softer feel around the greens. I’m still figuring out the distances. At $30/box, it doesn’t hurt my feelings as much when they go sailing out of bounds. I’m very happy with Snell for the price and I’ll stick with them. Thanks MyGolfSpy for a terrific website.

      Reply

      anon

      6 years ago

      May have asked this before, but it would be possible to publish all of the raw data for this (and other comparisons). As a data junkie, it would be interesting to take a deeper dive into the numbers.

      Reply

      Andrew

      6 years ago

      Yes- please do!

      Reply

      Larry S.

      6 years ago

      I’ve been playing the MTB since it came out. But as a tinkerer, I’ve tried most of the new balls as released – ProV1, Callaway, Bridgestone, Volvik, Wilson, etc. They are all great balls, but I keep returning to the MTB.

      Why? The article hit it right on the head – CONFIDENCE! After just 5-6 holes, you KNOW what the Snell ball will do. It feels right, it rolls right, it stops right. Ultimately trustable. The new black is even more of the same. Short game and putting are my strength – you can trust the MTB on the greens to roll consistent and true.

      Reply

      Spencer Reynolds

      6 years ago

      Is there any way you could add a 50 yard shot to this test using a 56 degree wedge so you could see spin numbers? Maybe even a 25 yard shot over a bunker or something?

      Reply

      Tony Blundetto

      6 years ago

      I’ve been playing Vice Pro balls for the past season. Can’t tell the difference between those and Pro V1, except for the price. How does Vice compare to Snell?

      Reply

      Brett Weir

      6 years ago

      With todays tour quality golf balls being at pretty much the allowable limits of the USGA & R&A, their performance are pretty much the same regardless of manufacturer. With that in mind, it all comes down to price and Snell balls are quite a good deal for new balls (used balls are even a better deal).

      Reply

      GilB

      6 years ago

      I was not chosen by GolfSpy to take part in this test so I did my own testing. While all the numbers here support my own research it was very important for me to have the confidence in deciding what ball to use in getting the best score and most fun and performance. The mental side of this made it an easy choice-Snell. My confidence level rose while using the Snell ball. It performed surprisingly well in all facets for me. I guess the proof is in the pudding, er, ball.

      Reply

      Walter

      6 years ago

      Good read, thanks. Is this to say the MTB blk is supposed to be the equal to the ProV1? So were does the MTB red fit in, is it supposed to be the equal to the ProV1X?

      Reply

      Andy Romanow

      6 years ago

      Red is a 4 piece ball which allegedly spins more around green. Comparison would be V1x.

      Reply

      Ron

      6 years ago

      Got the trial pack (6 Black, 6 Red). The Reds have more green side/approach spin with a slightly higher trajectory, similar feel. Been playing Snell since the first test, can’t see spending 40% more for the same performance.

      Reply

      Jabroni

      6 years ago

      What about the accuracy? It’s not mentioned outside of the graphics, but it seems the Pro V1 has an advantage there….

      Reply

      greg p

      6 years ago

      I just bought 8 doz ProV’s during their 4 for 3 promo at $35 doz.
      I stocked up for the year. The net difference is “only” $8 dz compared to Snell’s quantity discounts. Others, i.e. Srixon, B’stone, Callaway, are similarly discounted to the $25-30 range.

      That said, Snell’s performance is pretty impressive. (As are those mentioned above.)
      Unless one is tied up in brand loyalty, it is tough to justify paying a premium price for any other ball. Snell has all you need.

      Reply

      aman sodhi

      6 years ago

      I am a 4 handicapper. Have not tried Snell. I did try the Vice pro and while the distance was identical, there was not enough spin with wedges, causing some of the shots to be 15-20 feet longer…the difference of making the putt vs not… Anyone know if Snell compares to Vice, which felt harder as well?

      Reply

      Andy Romanow

      6 years ago

      I like Vice over Snell, but for admittedly no good reason…in my head, Snell (and KSig for that matter) both just…look like cheaper balls. I don’t know how else to describe it. Just something off about the look of both Snell and KSig, compared to a ProV.

      Vice is a little more polished in terms of optics and I can tell zero difference in terms of spin (I think testing has shown there’s no material difference in spin among ProV, Snell or Vice).

      The Vice is a little clickier than the Snell. Snell is a pretty soft feeling ball around the green. I’ve played red and black, both are fine. I feel like the Snell is a little more durable than Vice, but because both are cheap I tend to treat them as fungible.

      If you’re a rational human and don’t care what the ball looks like as long as it works, either MTB model is worth a try.

      That said, I think it is OK to admit that optics are worth something more than nothing here. If I’m in market for a driver and there are 2 with similar data, one $100 more and cheaper one doesn’t fit my eye, I’ll spend the money.

      I feel the same way about golf balls. You would have to go through a ton of balls for the difference in expense to add up to something material in the grand scheme of things you waste money on in golf every year. And I’d rather not hate what my ball looks like for an extra dollar a ball.

      If you play 30 rounds a year and avg 2 balls per round, that’s 60 bucks. Again, absent some dramatic performance advantage, its worth it to me to avoid having “that thing just looks cheap” go through my head before I hit it.

      Reply

      Large chris

      6 years ago

      Completely agree about the ‘optics’ (tactility as well).
      For me the pro V (a new one out of the box) has the best ‘optics’ quality. Another ball that really stood out for me for ‘optics’ was the Taylormade Project A.
      And yes over the course of a year, the money doesn’t add up to much, compared to what I spend on Jack Daniels.

      AMAN SODHI

      6 years ago

      agree with the optics 100%. I can for example play the Bridgestone with the dimple in dimple pattern and it does not bother me, however couple of my playing partners cannot stand it.

      Chris T

      6 years ago

      I am a 3 Handicap and gamed the Snell ball for a number of months. I also tried the Vice Pro ball. For me, Snell was noticeably better, really wasn’t even a comparison, compared to the Vice. IMO the Vice ball’s durability was terrible as well. Felt like I needed to pull out a new ball in the middle of the round because the cover was not holding up and I do not have that issue with any other ball. I moved away from the Snell because I felt like I was getting better distance from the ProV and TM TPX, etc. but I am intrigued to try the new Snell Tour Black as it should pick up some distance compared to the previous My Tour Ball. To answer your other question – If feel the Snell performed well around the greens and with wedges, similar to a ProV or other major tour ball. I’d give it a try if I were you.

      Reply

      Steven Phillip

      6 years ago

      To me these balls are fantastic … despite whether you opt for the Red or the Black is a no brainer .! Same / marginal performance difference .
      Durability of the old MTB was phenomenal ..& I do not see that changing with the new offering .
      Being here in the UK , not many guys tee this ball up , but once your playing partners see how this compares everyone wants to know about it ..
      At between £ 15 – £ 18 / dozen of a price difference it makes sense to play this ball …
      I am a convert ….let’s hope many others do likewisr to reduce the profits of Titleist / Taylor Made / Callaway .
      Regards Steven

      Reply

      Anonymous

      6 years ago

      I’ve been playing Snell for a couple years now. The MTB is noticeably better in performance and durability. The cost savings makes it a no brainer.

      Reply

      Dave

      6 years ago

      Sorry forgot to add you need a Canadian retailer for your balls Mr. Snell.

      Reply

      Walter

      6 years ago

      They do have a Canadian website with free shipping. Go to the USA website and click on international sales, then choose Canada.

      Reply

      Steve Markolf

      6 years ago

      Are there any thoughts to compare the Snell balls to the new Calloway chrome?

      Reply

      Dave

      6 years ago

      Goes to prove you are only paying for the name. If ping still had a golf ball they would be right up there with prov1 and Taylor made balls. So it’s nice to see a little competition. The price will only come down when the consumer stops buying .

      Reply

      Doug

      6 years ago

      Whoa whoa there McFly. Titleist is the front runner on tour 54 players masters week and 14 next competitor. I’m not saying performance is any better just stating Ping was in ball market and it folded as it should. Bridgestone and TM has made an impression in the sand but Titleist’s crater will never be matched. I have not tried the Snell but would be interested. My golf shop is Titleist exclusive and it’s simply because it’s the number 1 seller in golf.

      Reply

      DaveN

      6 years ago

      54 players are being paid ubsurd money to play Titleist balls. The major difference in prices from Snell and others is not paying those players and Marketing. It doesnt make their ball better! Watch Dean Snell’s videos and try the balls! You will see for yourself.

      Martin Hastie

      6 years ago

      Titleist are only leader because they pay the players the most to play the ball!!!!, simple. Players get bonuses on making cuts top 10 , top 5 and wins.

      Todd

      6 years ago

      They pay huge dollars for pros to play their ball…they would play a range ball if the money was right.

      boggey55

      6 years ago

      How could the average golfer justify playing a ball that is twice as expensive with almost identical playing results. Common sense should cause Snell balls to become a much more common appearance at every course. Thank you Dean Snell for producing a great golf ball for the masses!!

      Reply

      Woody

      6 years ago

      I have been playing the Snell MTB for 2 seasons now and have been extremely happy. The ball is equal to all the other Tour level balls I’ve tried, but for almost half the price. I love them!!!

      Reply

      Rob

      6 years ago

      4000 RPM for a six iron shot?!? What iron brand were you using and what are the peak heights of those shots? it’s going to be tough to hold a green unless the shots are coming in steep.

      Seems the distance averages of the 6 irons shots is a lot higher than the distance averages of the sand wedge and driver shots. I don’t see many people with 143mph ball speed with a driver hitting a 6 iron 180 yards unless the lofts are super low (Taylormade M4 irons for example).

      Reply

      MrHogan

      6 years ago

      I have played the Snell MTB since it`s release and will continue going forward. I am convinced it is a better ball.

      Reply

      Jim

      6 years ago

      Been playing the original MTB since it came out and this only confirms that the Snell ball(s) are comparable to any tour quality ball at a much lower price point. Testing their new offerings (Black and Red) now and find them to be better than the original, granted with limited testing due to horrible weather in New England. So far the Red spins slightly more on shorter shots with a quicker stopping, but it’s only really noticeable on perfectly struck shots. More testing required but either ball is a terrific choice for those wanting tour quality golf balls at a lower price point. Titleist and Callaway (both very good balls) need to rethink their sponsorship models if it results in $20 increased price over the Snell balls. Suggest getting the test packs to try them out.

      Reply

      MikeK

      6 years ago

      Played ProV1X for past 7 years and tried the Snell MTB Black. It is as long or longer than the ProV1. It is more durable, doesn’t scuff or nick like a ProV1 and it is $20 cheaper per dozen. Being a 12 handicap, I don’t hit them all down the middle. The major irritant with ProV1’s is that they are NOT that durable and seem to lose distance over a round. Snell seems to maintain performance thru several rounds where ProV’s lose over time. For me, I have finally found an affordable replacement for the ProV1’s. Its the MTB Black for me. NOTE: I have tried them all….. Callaway, TM, Srixon, Oncore, etc….. Snell outplays all of them and 1/2 the price and lasts longer as well. BIG BANG for the proverbial buck.

      Reply

      Some Guy

      6 years ago

      Hahahaha Pro Vs lose distance over a round? OK…

      Reply

      DaveN

      6 years ago

      If you played the V1X why arent you playing the MTB Red? Its a similar 4 piece ball.

      Reply

      Andrew

      6 years ago

      Construction isn’t the issue here- if you read the description of all 4 balls, the black seems to match up with the x.

      Andrew

      6 years ago

      Damn you, dyslexia! I meant it the other way around.

      Sandy Rosenthal

      6 years ago

      The Pro V’s don’t lose distance during a round. You must be beating them up pretty badly. If you play the Pro V1x you should be comparing them to the Snell Red. Also, the “street” price difference is only 4 to 8 bucks a dozen higher if you take the time to look.

      Reply

      Marshall

      6 years ago

      I’m a Snell convert, having played the MTB ball since it’s roll-out. Its every bit the ball the Pro-V1 is, and in my view, softer off the face of both driver and putter. I’m testing the newest iterations now, and I have little doubt they will be strong performers as well. Price aside (and that’s saying a lot !), Dean has done a great job in bringing a high performing, durable, and technically advanced ball to market.

      Reply

      Craigar

      6 years ago

      I received my test pack on Saturday and as soon as it quits snowing around here, I will try out the new Snells. I liked the old model, so I’m sure I will like these as well. I do know the one thing that will keep me coming back is the handwritten thank you from the man himself…Dean Snell.

      Reply

      mth

      6 years ago

      When I run out of Kirklands, Snell MTB’s are top of my list.

      I have a lot of Kirklands right now, though.

      Reply

      Walter

      6 years ago

      I see the Kirklands are back online in the USA, for how long who knows. How would the Kirklands compare to the MTB blk in performance and price?

      Reply

      mth

      6 years ago

      probably favorably. Go back in time and check out the stats from the kirklands vs pro v’s.

      Sharkhark

      6 years ago

      I haven’t tried then because their business model only makes sense for Americans not Canadians.

      The extra costs make it not worth it. Especially when I can go to golftown who routinely has premium balls example srixon z star on sale.

      I don’t want to have to buy 6 dozen at a time. The savings are low.
      It’s great that it’s a comparable premium ball to the prov1 but then again so I’d the Taylormade and the Srixon etc etc

      Reply

      Alex

      6 years ago

      Hi. I thought that too, but Snell has a Canadian base and distributes from Mississauga or Markham area. They have a Canadian website and it’s from there that I order my Snells. Go to snellgolfcanada.com

      Reply

      JOEL GOODMAN

      6 years ago

      i am an old guy-82- and still play to an 8 index from the shorter 6000 yd tees. I cannot tell much difference in any ball i play. They all go about 200-220 yds off the tee and all feel just fine. can anyone guess what the real cost of a golf ball is , without the burden of overhead and advertising? Probably about a quarter?????

      Reply

      MGolfer

      6 years ago

      I currently play pro v1x. What is the corresponding Snell model? Red? Yellow? Thanks.

      Reply

      STeve

      6 years ago

      The Snell MTB Red is probably more comparable to the Pro V1. The corresponding tweaks that Snell made were to bifurcate the performance characteristics of the original MTB ball. The Snell MTB Black reduced the compression by 7% to help the high spin guys off the driver (and maybe slightly less spin around the greens). Conversely, the type of golfer who appreciates a tour caliber ball, but needs a little more spin on approach shots would benefit from the tweaks made to the Snell MTB Red ball. The Red ball added an extra mantle layer and possesses a different dimple pattern all in an effort to meet the player who has extra spin requirements approaching the green. I bet the Snell MTB Red would spin more with the wedge AND driver. And would probably be comparable to Pro V1 wedge spin numbers.

      Reply

      NYGolfer

      6 years ago

      The black is actually probably going to be the closest while the red should be closer to the proV. i’d love to see testing with the red here and comparisons between the prov1 and the prov1x

      Reply

      MattF

      6 years ago

      It would be the MTB Red…either the white or the optic yellow.

      Reply

      93civiccpe

      6 years ago

      I’ve been playing the original MTB for years & really like the performance. I cannot wait to see how the 4 piece MTB stacks up!

      Reply

      derek gzaskow

      6 years ago

      agree, wouldn’t the more spinning ball be a better comparison? seems like this would be better reviewed to the proviX

      Reply

      Tony D

      6 years ago

      I am a 9 HDC player and play 3 times a week.
      I’ve played PRO V1 balls for years and thought i’d try the Snell MTB RED balls. Sorry, no comparison! Snell ball feels too hard and did not have the spin as promised. Usually pay about the same price for PRO V when on promotion.

      Reply

      Some Guy

      6 years ago

      This whole test shows a negligible difference in spin…

      Reply

      Andrew

      6 years ago

      MTB black was tested.

      DGreen

      6 years ago

      My Snell Black’s arrived a couple weeks ago but it has been too cold to play …………….. come on warm weather!

      Reply

      Nrqd

      6 years ago

      I love the Snell balls. The golfING world has always needed a top shelf ball for less money. I have played pro v1 balls since they were released, but I try new balls out all the time. There are so many good balls out now it’s insane. For me I still game a pro v1 because it does what I want it to do and I have a chemistry with it. However, the snell mtb is a great ball and if I hadn’t have been using pro v1 for nearly 20 years maybe I would switch

      Reply

      Aaron

      6 years ago

      I have been playing the original Snell MTB for two seasons now and they are as good as any ball out there. I hope to get my hands on the black and red soon to test, but have some left over stock to play first. I used to play all kinds of tour balls as most offer the same performance, it all depends on price. The advantage of the Snell or any other direct to consumer ball is the price, its not that it is better than the Pro V1, it’s that it is half the cost with similar or same performance. The same goes for Vice, Oncore, or even Kirkland, if they all cost $52/doz, then what would be the advantage. This test doesn’t show the Pro V1 is not the best best, rather it is not the best ball you can play for the price. do your self a favor and try the Snell and take a honest unbiased test of it, and you will find little to no difference in performance. You can do everything you need with it. I have no issues fighting it high, low, or moving it either direction. Finally, it has more than enough spin to stop on the green from any distance. If you are telling yourself it is inferior in any way, then you are just not looking at the results through unbiased lenses.

      Reply

      Jimmie

      6 years ago

      I’ve used the Snell my tour ball and as a 15 handicapper I was unable to see any difference between the two. I am unable to see any real difference in any of the tour balls out there and for that reason I generally will play Snell our the project a’s because of the price point.

      Reply

      txgolfjunkie

      6 years ago

      After seeing the test data, I’d like to quote Owen Wilson:

      Wow.

      Reply

      Kevinhooch

      6 years ago

      It’s nice to see a few reasonably priced options perform as good if not better than the primo priced options. Between Snell, Costco and Bridgestone’s promotions, I don’t plan on spending more than $25 – $35 per dozen ever again!

      Reply

      Cody

      6 years ago

      i have played both the new snell red and black. they are great balls for the price. are there better balls? sure, but at $31/dozen the list of better balls is very short.

      Reply

      Terry McDowell

      6 years ago

      FYI The sand wedge graphic says 6 iron.

      Reply

      Imonthebacknine

      6 years ago

      I was injured last year and played only 4 rounds of golf. However, I had the chance to play the Snell MTB the previous year and found no appreciable difference between that and the Pro V1. Although, I had my first double eagle while playing the Snell MTB. I’m looking forward to trying the new Snell ball this year.

      Reply

      Tim

      6 years ago

      Did anything about each golf ball’s relative durability come to light in this test? I’m really impressed with how durable ProV1s are; a single one seems to hold up nicely through multiple rounds as long as I keep it in play.

      It seems like both golf balls are very close performance-wise, which is eye-opening given the price difference. If the Snell balls are also as durable as the Titleists, it adds another dimension to the comparison.

      Reply

      Fred

      6 years ago

      Tim,

      I’ve used the MTB previous model for a couple of years and found the durability to be not as good as other similar quality golf balls. I have not tried the latest model but I have the MTB Black on order and hope to try them out this week so I am interested to see if the durability has improved.

      Reply

      ole gray

      6 years ago

      Sounds like with the price of the Snell balls being that good, it’s a no brainer when the two tested have similar results. I have a dozen of the Reds in my truck waiting to be spanked on the arse. Looking forward to the results and if they perform as well as they are priced, I’ll become a fanboy!

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Irons
    Apr 24, 2024
    PXG Irons: Model By Model
    Putters
    Apr 23, 2024
    PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
    News
    Apr 23, 2024
    Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.