2018 MOST WANTED UTILITY IRON
Irons

2018 MOST WANTED UTILITY IRON

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

2018 MOST WANTED UTILITY IRON

INDEPENDENT & UNBIASED

MyGolfSpy accepts $0 advertising dollars from any of the major golf manufacturers. We believe in always putting #ConsumerFirst.

60 hours

Hours
Researched

12

Products
Considered

2,548

Shots
Hit

36.6m

Readers

2018 Most Wanted Utility Iron Rankings

About This Test

All testing was conducted inside our fully independent test facility located in Yorktown, Virginia. All testers used Bridgestone Tour B-RX golf balls for consistency and to reduce test variables. Ball and head data were collected using Foresight Sports GCQuad launch monitors.

  • SHOTS HIT: 2,548
  • DATA POINTS: 155,428
  • TIME: 60 hours
  • TESTERS: 20
  • HANDICAP RANGE: +2 – 15
  • AGE RANGE: 18 – 55
  • DRIVER SWING SPEED RANGE: 85 mph – 120 mph
  • IRONS TESTED: Utility irons with static stamped lofts ranging from 17°-19°

GET FIT FOR YOUR GAME WITH TRUEGOLFFIT™

Unbiased. No Guesswork. All Major Brands. Matched To Your Swing. Advanced Golf Analytics matches the perfect clubs to your exact swing using connected data and machine learning.

FREE FITTING

Field Notes

This section details equipment specifications and any outliers that might be present in that data.

  • Models tested included almost exclusively models stamped as 2-irons. In cases where manufacturers don’t offer a true 2-iron equivalent (GAPR Mid, PING G400, Ft.Worth hi, and Cobra KING) we tested the lowest lofted model available and leveraged adjustability where possible.
  • The measured lofts of the utilities tested ranged from 17° to 19.25°; the average measured loft for the models tested is 17.79°
  • The measured lie angles varied from 58.75° to 61°; the average lie for the models tested is 60.1°
  • We observed a near perfect correlation between measured loft and launch angles across the entirety of the utility irons tested
  • The Srixon Z U85 has the highest swing weight at D 4.2. The average across all models was lighter at D 2.29

2018 Most Wanted Utility Iron Data

Why Choose a Utility Iron?

As is often the case on the PGA Tour, a Utility iron may move in and out of your bag depending on course conditions. Windy conditions and firm fairways like those often encountered during the Open Championship are often why professional choose utility clubs. Beyond cheating the wind, other reasons to consider utility clubs include narrow fairways, long par-3s, and other scenarios where precision and workability can supplant the need to maximize distance. When the goal is to simply get the ball in play off the tee, for some, the utility club may the best bet.

In the most general sense, utility irons are built for golfers who require shotmaking versatility from tee to green. Depending on the loft, a utility iron could replace a long iron (or hybrid), a fairway wood, and some rare cases, even the driver. There are a variety of situations and condition which could warrant adding a utility iron to your bag.

The best utility irons are those that strike the right balance between distance, accuracy, and versatility.

Tech Trends

There’s some evidence to suggest that the popularity of utility irons is on the rise. Certainly, the number of options available to the consumer has never been greater, and its worth noting that professionals across all major tours are bagging utility irons when the course conditions call for it. That’s likely a result in the evolution of technology with the utility/driving iron space. The modern utility clubs isn’t the butter knife 1-iron that Jack Nicklaus so famously carried. Today’s utility clubs are easier to hit and, as alternatives to hybrids, better suited to bridge the gap between woods and irons.

While not long ago, the utility space was comprised mostly of single-piece designs, the industry has shifted towards multi-piece, hollow body or filled cavity designs. Filled designs like those used by PXG (not tested) and TaylorMade purportedly allow for thinner faces which produce faster ball speeds. True hollow-body designs borrow heavily from the metal-wood space where the design premise is that nothing should interfere with the face’s ability to flex and rebound.

While not ubiquitous as it is in the driver category, we’ve observed a slight uptick in the number of adjustable options within the utility space. Cobra launched the first adjustable driving iron three years ago. TaylorMade introduced adjustability to its line with the GAPR series, and it’s reasonable to expect that others will follow. As with other clubs, the adjustable hosel gives the golfer the ability to dial-in loft and manipulate trajectory with the simple turn of a wrench. That opens up a wider array of fitting and performance options.

Feedback from the Most Wanted Test Pool

One of the most popular among the testers was the Srixon Z U85 utility. Rated at the top for feel and sound, the ZU85 encompasses what many of our testers felt was a complete utility; combining looks, feel and performance all in one package. More than half of the testers rated this club as one of their favorites. Our 2018 Most Wanted Utility Test, TaylorMade’s GAPR Mid, was also a favorite among the testers. It was rated near the top for looks and feel. Testers also praised its ability to get the ball in the air.

Frequently in a test we see some mixed feedback – half the test group loves one model, while the other half seems to dislike it. The TaylorMade P790 UDI was certainly one of those products. Some testers reported that the P790 UDI pleasantly surprised them with feel and sound; while some said it was clunky. The lower handicap golfers in the test preferred this model as its tight profile resembles that of a long iron they are accustomed to gaming.

The PING G400 Crossover also received mixed feedback. Half of the test rated it highly for feel, many noting that the higher loft made it easier to launch the ball high. This was a particularly common sentiment among our slower swing speed players. A sizeable group of testers felt differently, rating the club near the bottom for sound and feel.

One club that received almost universally negative feedback from the test group was the TaylorMade GAPR Lo. That’s somewhat surprising given the performance of TaylorMade’s other offerings in this test. However, testers reported that the length of the club felt too long (it measures 40 1/8″) and that the lie was too upright. As is sometimes the case, our testers struggled to reconcile the looks and feel with what we’d classify as above average performance.

Buying Advice

Finding the right utility club ultimately depends on how you plan to use it. Is it exclusively for use off-the-tee? Is there a long par-3 you need to reach, or do you plan to use it for a variety of shots from tee to green?

Here are the other factors you should consider:

  • Trajectory – If you’re looking to hit wind-cheating bullets, stick with the low launching clubs (P790 UDI, Exotics CBX, GAPR Lo).  If you’re going to attack greens or need a trusty fairway finder, you may want to lean towards higher spinning options like PING G400 and Ben Hogan Ft. Worth hi. For balanced performance in a variety of situations, we recommend our 2018 Most Wanted Utility, TaylorMade’s GAPR Mid.
  • Length –  As you’d expect, club length is not consistent from one brand to the next. While that’s the sort of thing that’s easily addressed by a qualified fitter, if you plan to go it alone, it’s an important factor to consider. A little extra shaft length might give you more distance, but if it compromises your ability to repeatedly make center contact or significantly diminishes your ability to hit it straight, it may not be worth it.
  • Shaft – As with length, the shaft weights of the utility irons also varied significantly.  While most weigh in at about 80-85 grams, the G400 Utility features a lighter, 70-gram shaft, whereas the TaylorMade P790 UDI and Mizuno FLI-HI are outfitted with 110-gram steel options. The weight of the shaft will likely have performance implications. Also, keep in mind that options at the extreme ends of the weight range will give you less flexibility to move to a significantly heavier or significantly lighter shaft without having to compensate for large swing weight changes.
  • Adjustability – While it’s hard to make a case that adjustability is something you absolutely need in a utility iron, for compulsive tinkerers seeking to adjust their clubs to meet course conditions, adjustable hosel give you the flexibility to tune loft down when fairways are firm and fast, or turn it up to maximize carry when the course is playing a bit softer.

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS


Amount

Frequency

For You

For You

Best Spiked Golf Shoes Best Spiked Golf Shoes
Buyer's Guides
Apr 26, 2024
Best Spiked Golf Shoes of 2024
Golf Balls
Apr 26, 2024
Ball Lab: Callaway Chrome Tour 2024
News
Apr 26, 2024
Why You Need to Book a Links Golf Trip Across the Pond
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Our mission is #ConsumerFirst. We are here to help educate and empower golfers. We want you to get the most out of your money, time and performance. That means providing you with equipment reviews you can trust, as well as honest reporting on the latest issues affecting the game today. #PowerToThePlayer

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Driver Ping G30 Hybrids PXG 0317
3/4 IRON PXG 0311XF 5-GW Srixon Z 565
SW PXG 0317 LW PXG 0311
Putter EVNROLL  
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Chris

      5 years ago

      I’ve been looking to fill that gap space myself. Play a lot in the winds of North Dakota. My King F7 hybrid works well in the rough. But the wind really lays into it. Right to left wind I’m usually aiming way out of the fairway and bringing it back. Hope to try out the Ping crossover, GAPR mid or maybe TaylorMade. Looking in that 3 iron range myself. I’ve always liked the look and hit the 3 iron better than hybrids for some reason.

      Reply

      Spencer

      5 years ago

      I’ve hit and loved the Ben Hogan iron but couldn’t really test it with the new direct to consumer plan they have. Personally the Titelist TMB worked best for me.

      Reply

      Brian

      5 years ago

      Interesting that your most wanted utility irons are longer than the most wanted 3 woods…

      Reply

      Ryebread

      5 years ago

      Thanks for the inclusion of a bit more “color” with this review. The mix of data, tester comments, a bit of buyer’s guide, etc. reminded me of the MGS of old. This was the best review on the site in quite some time.

      Bravo!!!!

      Reply

      Andrew

      5 years ago

      Agree 100%! This is the kind of review I signed up for!!! Keep it up!!!

      Reply

      Dave T

      5 years ago

      Agreed! The commentary is very much appreciated

      Reply

      Mark M

      5 years ago

      Thanks for testing utility clubs. I’m currently an 8 hdcp and for me they are a great way to fill gaps, provide better performance than normal long irons and better feel, maneuverability and accuracy than hybrids.
      I play Mizuno MP-64s and use a 26° Hogan Ft Worth Hi, 22° Callaway Razor X Util and then a 19° TM R-15 hybrid.
      The Hogan Ft Worth Hi gives me an easy to hit, high flying 5-iron that I can step on and get more distance from if needed.
      The Callaway Razor X Utility is great from the deck, the tee and handy in the rough as well. I can hit a low bullet or loft it depending on what’s needed.
      If you haven’t tried any of these utility clubs I think you’re doing yourself a disservice!

      Reply

      Oliver izzard

      5 years ago

      Thanks for sharing, I’m also playing a 22 degree hybrid and looking for a 5 iron replacement around 26 degrees, I find that my 6 iron and 5 iron tend to carry the same distance from the fairway. (but carry is good for 5 iron of the tee)

      Could you share some more bout how that benhogan club performs on fairway?

      Thanks!

      Reply

      Doug Mael

      5 years ago

      I played the 21* Exotics CB Pro H “iron wood” 39.5″ playing length) for two years, and switched to the CBX Iron Wood in a 22* loft (also 39.5″ long) early in 2018. Both clubs work very well for me from the tee, and although the CB Pro H was fairly accurate, the CBX Iron Wood is “point-and-shoot” accurate from both the tee and the fairway (not recommended by me for use from the rough, unless the rough is pretty short and not very thick). I only generate about 88-91 MPH in clubhead speed with my long irons and hybrids, so utility irons are not considered to be an ideal fit for me. However, I easily get 210+ yards with the 22* CBX Iron Wood, which is shafted with a Kuro Kage Silver 80-S utility/hybrid shaft.

      My 22* CBX Iron Wood takes the place of both a 3 and 4 iron in my bag. My next-longest iron is a 25* 5-iron, and I play either a 17.5* Exotics CB Pro F2 55-wood or an 18* CBX hybrid as my 225-230 yard club, depending on the type of course that I am playing.

      Reply

      Troy

      5 years ago

      Can you do a full review of the ben hogan irons . The new Edge, ptx’s and the new coat black ft.worth irons

      Reply

      mackdaddy

      5 years ago

      They are only selling them on line so no expert fitting!

      Reply

      Alex

      5 years ago

      In my last week fitting session I have tried both the Gapr and P790. P790 2i is Hands down my favorite one mostly because the feedback but also related to the trackman numbers . About distance I hit the P790 at 240+ yds while the Gapdr was shorter, also consistency was not so different between the two

      Reply

      steve

      5 years ago

      Thanks for doing this, I appreciate the insight and the information. I think that the results make quite a bit of sense. The differences are not massive, but they exist. This gives us a good idea of where to start looking, when looking for the right utility.

      Lately, I have been wondering more about performance differences for the 2 and 3 versions of these various clubs. I have the MiFli 3, and have considered the 2, but there is roughly 2* loft difference. As near as I can tell, across the board, the difference between a 2 and a 3 is about 2*. This test suggests there is not a whole lot in it, since some are 2s and others are 3s…

      Reply

      Steven C

      5 years ago

      I have really liked my Srixon U65. It is one of my favorite clubs in the bag.

      This was a nice write up of the results. I liked the 1, 2, 3 rankings that you did in the past, but it was usually a short read and left me wanting something more. Having both quantitative and qualitative data is a good move, in my opinion.

      Reply

      MannyV

      5 years ago

      I have the Hogan in 21 degrees and love it. I mainly hit it on par 4s to find the fairways. My driver ss is 110 if anyone is interested.

      Reply

      Sen

      5 years ago

      This ranking is a bit concerning, please correct me if I’m wrong. MGS is known to be data centric, yet judging from what I see that placed top was not just their data merits, but rather what people liked about the looks feels and sound, which is not what you guys are all about. Those objective things are out, just pure numbers, what was the longest with the tightest dispersion and the most consistent height should be all there is to it.

      These objective comments are like a certain golf magazine, there’s is a reason why I’m not reading that. I come here for unbiased data, I hope next time the comments about feel/sound/looks would be a note under each of the clubs but rather rank the most wanted in the most unbiased way possible.

      Reply

      Brandon

      5 years ago

      The ugliest club won.

      Reply

      Sen

      5 years ago

      Not by strokes gained merit, the top 3 should have been:
      1)TM p790 0.0119
      2)TM GAPR mid 0.0093
      3)Exotics CBX 0.0093

      By shot area it is G400 P790 and ZU85

      By total it is p790 gapr lo and cbx

      You see what I mean?

      Tony Covey

      5 years ago

      First, it isn’t a top 3.

      Look more closely and you’ll see an overall winner/best performing, which was the GAPR Mid.
      The P790 was chosen best for distance (because even if we don’t think it’s always the best approach, we know that for a good number of readers, distance is the only thing that matters).
      The Ft. Worth hi was chosen best for accuracy.

      To your initial concerns – the subjective stuff accounts for ZERO percent in our rankings. Opinions/Feedback from the testers and the staff is something readers have pushed us to add, so we did. Doesn’t count for anything, but it’s there for readers who want it.

      We have tweaked our ranking algorithms a bit. Overall encompasses 5 metrics that we believe provide insight into different areas of performance. The longest overall involves total yards as well as another distance metric we’ve used in the past. Finally, the ‘accuracy’ metric is based on Shot Area and FW%.

      Again – results are 100% from what the totality of our data tells us.

      When there are excellent performers that sell for significantly below the average price, we will also add a Best Value choice. In this particular test, we didn’t find anything we felt qualified.

      P.J.

      5 years ago

      The Srixon Z U85 had some suprising numbers! I never really considered them until I went through the numbers. Thanks for the insight, MGS!

      Reply

      Brandon

      5 years ago

      I would like to see a head to head comparison in the same loft with the GAPR low and the Adams DHy from about 5 years ago. Think that would be pretty interesting as they are fairly similar in concept. Just scored a mint DHy for 18 bucks on eBay.

      Reply

      Steve

      5 years ago

      I would go a step further and say that the DHy was the start of this “new” interest in the utility iron. I still have a 21/24/27 set-up that I play fairly often with a fitted accra shaft. I can hit them low, high, left and right. In my “testing”, they held their own against everything in this group that I could get my hands on. This new group is – except for the gapr – quite a bit better looking than the DHy…

      Reply

      RS

      5 years ago

      I put a Steelfiber 110 in my Mizuno Flihi had it built to D2 and he clubs is a rocket. It really come down to the shaft on these and most clubs. If you don’t want to swap shafts you can butt trim in 3/8” and that should knock it down 2 Swinfweights.

      Reply

      Brad

      5 years ago

      The Srixon utility irons are the only ones I’ve had consistent success with and really enjoyed using on course (used U45 previously and now a U85). I’m not surprised that over half of the Most Wanted testers preferred it over the others. It is possibly the best-all rounder of the bunch.

      To my eye, the GAPR range are just ugly things, and didn’t perform as well for me as the Srixon’s. For some people, they obviously do. Taylormade could have done a much better job with the aesthetics of the GAPR; though, considering how pretty the P790 irons and UDI are in comparison. It’s like the ugly duckling amongst the bunch.

      I wouldn’t consider the Ben Hogan to be a true UT iron. It is really just a slightly more forgiving traditional 2 or 3 iron. The numbers support that and are close to what a standard 3-iron from the “Players Distance” category would provide. This is also probably why it is more accurate. Less ball speed and carry means less chance for going offline.

      Reply

      Jon

      5 years ago

      The Hogan iron per the website tops out at 22 degrees, how could the irons have then ranged from 17-19 degrees? Forgive me if I am missing something.

      Reply

      Sam Robinson

      5 years ago

      We wanted to include Hogan despite it not being a perfect fit. It came in as a stamped 20* and we bent it to 19 to be more inline with the rest of the pool.

      It is interesting to note that the 20* is not available at retail – something we’re currently working with Hogan to figure out specifics for.

      Reply

      Brandon

      5 years ago

      Am I missing something or did you guys not specify the loft of each club? Would be cool to know which ones were 17, 18, or 19 specifically.

      Ben Hogan Golf

      5 years ago

      Hi Sam – we are currently out of anything less than 22 degrees. We will be releasing a 18 degree in the same model and 20 degree early 2019.

      bens197

      5 years ago

      No surprise to see the Hogan do so well. I play a 21-24-27; I wish they’d make an 18.

      Reply

      Jason Boyle

      5 years ago

      Was the cobra one length utility tested? I would REALLY like to see some results from that being tested. The idea of essentially hitting my 7 iron 230 yards is intriguing to me.

      Reply

      Sam Robinson

      5 years ago

      The one length was not submitted by Cobra for testing

      Reply

      Ryan

      5 years ago

      Great write-up. Would love to see how the one length cobra utility faired against these. Anyone on the board play it before.

      Reply

      Jason Boyle

      5 years ago

      I just asked the same thing! I have not hit it yet only because I cannot find a demo anywhere

      Reply

      Ian

      5 years ago

      I have one in the bag after some struggles with the driver. Sits between my F8 3 wood and F7 3/4 hybrid set down at 18 degrees which is the lowest setting. I had to get one from the Cobra rep to test but can confirm the ball comes off like a bullet. My ball flight isn’t the highest so if I want descent angle into a green I’d hit a hybrid but off the tee the thing is a 2 iron stinger straight out of the box that rolls and rolls and rolls. FYI I’m mid-90s swing speed and have the stock stiff option shaft-UST Mamiya 780ES SmacWrap in it. With it being one length the club is an absolute sleeper. Doesn’t look much of a club but rolls past drivers.

      For anyone concerned about the dark finish the wear on it is unnoticeable. It looks like it’s never been hit.

      On summer fairways or windy conditions this has been a fantastic add to the bag. I’ll wait and see for the winter when carry becomes more of a factor.

      I’d definitely recommend trying a Utility iron to see if it suits your eye/game but it could be course dependent. Great for the summer roster but maybe not a weekly starter.

      Tyson

      5 years ago

      What loft were you using on the Hogan? I have looked and inquired about a 2-iron lofted Ft. Worth Hi a couple months ago, only to get a response that they were sold out of 20-21 degree lofts and had no plans to restock them. Leaving the lowest lofted option 22 degrees (equal to their 4-iron), kind of an oxymoron to me given what this club is supposed to achieve. No visible adjustability options either from what I can tell.

      Reply

      Sam Robinson

      5 years ago

      If you refer to my comment above – we actually received the stamped 20* and bent it to 19. Unsure why they aren’t planning to restock, working to get some specifics from Hogan as we speak.

      Reply

      NormW

      5 years ago

      Interesting test, good comments, but this high hcp, slow swing speed player, finds it irrelevant. What club would I drop out? 3-wood? Why? $$ better spent elsewhere.

      Reply

      Jordan

      5 years ago

      It would drop out your hybrid. I personally like the versatility of these. I’m actually starting to be onboard with going Driver, 5 wood, and 3 Utility Iron. Most players have trouble hitting a 3 wood from the fairway consistently, so the shorter shaft and higher loft of the 5 wood helps straighten things out while only sacrificing like 10 yards. I like having a driving iron off the tee too, they are money when it comes to finding a fairway when you need it. Ask Tiger at the PGA Championship.

      Reply

      Thomas

      5 years ago

      Are Ut’s mainly for higher swing speeds
      Versus speeds 80 to 90 mph???
      Always thought of blending Ut’s for long irons. Just considering ?

      Reply

      Doug

      5 years ago

      Thomas,

      Generally and from my own experience, I’d say you need higher swing speed for utility irons. My driver swing speed tops out around 108 and my iron swing has never exceeded high 90s, and I found utility irons weren’t for me. However, I did find the GAPR LO and MID products to be a different story, and this is even after trying unsatisfactorily with the P790 2&3s. I think it’s a touch of weight and forgiveness that I didn’t find in the irons. It’s worth a shot!

      Reply

      chrisk

      5 years ago

      Here’s my two cents’ worth: I’m a 5 handicap, and consider myself a slower-swing speed player (my driver ss is about 100 mph, sometimes more in the summertime when i’m loose). I hit my 7-iron about 155. My trouble in gapping has been the 3, 4, and 5 irons not being too far from each other. I got the Ping g400 3 utility, and it’s a good club to carry 185-195 yards (not including rollout). I took out my 3 iron and 4 iron. I’ve got my 5 iron for the 180 yard shots. It’s been an absolute life-saver on the course for me. So if you’re in my camp and hit your 5 iron about 175 yards or thereabouts, then absolutely I believe one of these utilities should go in your bag!

      Reply

      MK

      5 years ago

      Is it possible in the Tableau interface to filter the performance data based on tester swing speed? As someone who uses your results to narrow down what I go hit in the shop, it would be interesting to see how the various clubs performed for testers that more closely match my swing characteristics.
      Really enjoy what you guys do!

      Reply

      Walter

      5 years ago

      I tested the Tour Edge CBx iron-wood 19* in the summer at their demo days. Great club to hit, couldn’t believe the distance from this club. I didn’t have measured distances but from the range markers but I’d say close to the 250 mark and the peak height from this club was perfect for what I like. I do use the Exotics EX9 hybrid 17* which is just a bomber from the fairway or the rough. To me just another great wood from the Tour Edge Exotics line. I also use one of their 3 woods too, so yes I like their clubs. Now I just have to wait for the prices to fall on the CBx to pick one up.

      Reply

      Andy

      5 years ago

      Surprising the CBX did not crack the top 3. It scored well in distance and fairway% and strokes gained came in 2nd.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      5 years ago

      CBX is solid, but we took a different approach to the rankings that tries to better focus on what an individual golfer might be looking for. Rather than 1, 2, 3, we identified an overall best (Most Wanted), the best for pure Distance, and the best for accuracy/consistency.

      Reply

      Kyle

      5 years ago

      Great job with this most wanted category! I hope it bleeds through to future category rankings.

      chisag

      5 years ago

      I just hate the fact that MGS uses B-RX balls for their testing. While I am sure a handful of good players use this ball, I have never played with anyone that does. I tried it and disliked everything about it and gave them to my wife, a good player and with a slower swing speed a target player for this ball. This ball is almost the opposite of what better players use when playing and in a review of DI’s, Players irons, etc it just renders the whole thing irrelevant to the golfers it is supposed to address.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      5 years ago

      The B-RX is historically the best-selling ball in the Bridgestone lineup. Occasionally I think about moving to the Tour B, but that would run contrary to B’Stone’s traditional swing speed driven positioning. There are signs they could be moving away from that, so it’s possible we could jump to the Tour B in ’19.

      Reply

      Scoot24

      5 years ago

      The B-RX balls are a great ball. It seems that ball use comes in cliques. Guys in the groups I play with seem to follow each other so all tend to use the same ball. The group I play with that all use ProV1s are fun to play with because I can give them a hard time about buying the hype. When they say more pros play with them my response is ” of course they do, Titleist pays the most”.

      Reply

      Jason Peterman

      5 years ago

      wondering how these compare off the tee/deck/rough since they’re considered “utility” clubs. Can’t imagine the TM UDI being ranked as high if someone had to hit it out of the rough. I think the clubs with a larger sole, gapr mid, srixon zu, xforged ut would have done much better in terms of overall performance.

      Reply

      JG

      5 years ago

      Really love the new format with greater detail after the results are published!

      Reply

      Adam

      5 years ago

      Tony, what are the typical differences that you see between utility irons and similarly lofted hybrids? Launch angle, distance, spin, forgiveness, etc. Do they perform more like irons than a hybrid does?

      Reply

      KF

      5 years ago

      As always, these articles are a good starting point. Being brand loyal is one factor almost all golfers will adhere to, but it just comes down to trying and using what fits your game/swing proficiency. Higher handicap players, use equipment that will help your game, not what gets you cred on the driving range.

      Reply

      tom

      5 years ago

      That’s an excellent point!!

      Reply

      Travis

      5 years ago

      For the price and the options that Ben Hogan looks like a winner.

      Reply

      Kansas King

      5 years ago

      I agree. I’ve never understood why distance matters on clubs that are meant to fill a gap. I won’t get started on my rant about how distance doesn’t matter with gapped clubs (mainly irons and utilities) only consistent distance and ability to make the ball stop (control).

      If the club is meant to fill a gap then there is not a better club than the Ben Hogan according to the testing. Highest launching and spinning, and tightest shot area.

      I think some of the clubs are designed for low penetrating ball flight and that is a maybe what you want depending on the course you play. But on the whole I don’t understand the results. I could see the GAPR Mid getting second but it doesn’t come close to the Ben Hogan’s spin and launch numbers.

      Can we PLEASE get the loft measured (or at least record the stamped loft) on the clubs that were tested. 17 vs. 19 degrees can make a big difference in launch and spin. I do appreciate and thank you for your testing.

      Reply

      JD

      5 years ago

      I love my Mizuno Fli-Hi, although its a tad heavy. I like my irons and fairways to be D2, and Mizuno said these were D2, however the one I have is D4 and feels heavy. Any advice on lowering swing-weight of a driving iron without shortening the shaft?

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      5 years ago

      A lighter shaft (usually), counter balanced weight, or a heavier grip will do it. With the latter, you’re really just tricking the scale, but you might be able to feel the difference.

      Reply

      Sean

      5 years ago

      Tony,

      Sorry for the wrong thread but you mentioned grips and I’ve had an Evnroll grip question for the longest time, maybe you could help me out.

      Are those new grips featured in the “Part 2” of your interview with Rife available? I do not see them in the ‘grips’ category when I hit ‘customize club’.

      Is there any reference they have to show which grips are what? Like how can I visualize what an oversize 117 gram grip is vs. an oversize 60 gram grip, vs the regular 100 and 68 gram grips?

      Sorry again for location of post, any help would be appreciated!

      JD

      5 years ago

      Unfortunately i just went from a Px 6.0 to a Modus 120s to save 5 grams, but that didnt do much. I’m hesitant to do one of Nippon’s 105s shafts though, but we’ll see. Thanks. I agree with the rankings but my fli-hi still feels the best :)

      Bob

      5 years ago

      In regards to the Evnroll new shafts , these will be available February of 2019.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Best Spiked Golf Shoes Best Spiked Golf Shoes
    Buyer's Guides
    Apr 26, 2024
    Best Spiked Golf Shoes of 2024
    Golf Balls
    Apr 26, 2024
    Ball Lab: Callaway Chrome Tour 2024
    News
    Apr 26, 2024
    Why You Need to Book a Links Golf Trip Across the Pond
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.