2022 Brand Perception Survey Results
News

2022 Brand Perception Survey Results

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

2022 Brand Perception Survey Results

A few weeks ago, we published our Brand Perception Survey. It’s a reputation survey of sorts wherein we ask you to tell us which golf brands come to mind when you hear a given word. Half of the words are considered positive while the other half carry strong negative connotations.

By the time the results were tallied, nearly 10,000 of you had your voices heard.

Last week, we focused on a selection of winners for what we consider the most impactful and relevant words in the survey. Today, we’re digging into the full results. For each word, we’ll show you the results. We’ll also highlight any notable insights from deeper in the chart.

What To Look For

While there’s always movement in the table, what we’ve come to expect is that the biggest brands in golf tend to hover near the top. Where things get particularly interesting is when a small to mid-sized brand finishes at or near the top or when a large brand fails to register (this can be either good or bad depending on the context).

To help you identify trends in the data, we’ll frequently reference the percentage change from our last survey. When the numbers are large, it might suggest a brand is trending in one direction or the other.

With that out of the way, let’s look at the results.

This year’s results show a change at the top with Titleist leapfrogging PING as the industry’s most favored performance brand. It’s hard to point to one particular reason why. Titleist’s Ball Lab results have been strong and their Most Wanted rankings have improved as well. I suppose it’s also possible that “Titleist is Performance” commercials are imprinted on our brains.

The company was chosen by 31 percent of respondents. Year-over-year or, more accurately, survey-over-survey showed an uptick of 55 percent while the rest of the top five were within a percentage point or two of the previous result.

Other Notables

  • Mizuno remains an outlier of sorts as small to midsized brands aren’t typically top of mind. The company dipped 11 percent from the last survey but still ranked ahead of some much larger brands
  • PXG didn’t hit the chart but it received four percent of responses. That’s by no means massive but the 51-percent increase from the previous survey is significant.
  • Srixon/Cleveland was chosen 10 percent more often, pushing it past COBRA which fell by 30 percent.

In our last survey, TaylorMade nosed past Callaway as the industry leader for “innovation.” This time, it was a runaway top choice, receiving 33 percent of responses. That’s an astounding change of 63 percent from the previous survey—almost certainly powered by its carbon-faced Stealth Driver.

Callaway held on to second (15 percent) despite being chosen 26 percent less often than last time.

Other Notables

  • PXG moved into fourth place with more than 12 percent, up 37 percent.
  • Titleist has never finished among the leaders but increased its share of positive responses by 42 percent.
  • COBRA held on to fifth spot despite a significant drop (down 54 percent) from the previous survey.

PING is synonymous with “engineering.” They’ve been the first choice by double-digit percentage points all four times we’ve run this survey. TaylorMade, at 18 percent (up 25 percent from the previous survey), moved into the second spot for the first time (again, likely due to Stealth) while Callaway fell to third, down 17 percent.

Other Notables

  • Titleist moved into the top five for the first time after being chosen 36 percent more often than last time.
  • PXG supplanted Mizuno in the top five. They were chosen 11 percent more often this year. Mizuno fell by five percent.
  • COBRA dropped to four percent, a decline of 50 percent from the previous survey.

We know golf brands pride themselves on being the “No. 1 Whatever” it happens to be in golf. As for of whom you think of first: Titleist claimed the top spot for the second year in a row with an astounding 42 percent of responses, up 37 percent from last time.

Telling perhaps, the other four brands at the top saw declines from the previous survey. TaylorMade dropped by 14 percent, Callaway by seven, PING by 30 and Mizuno by 25.

Other Notables

  • None of the Above, the sixth most popular choice, was selected 19 percent of the time (a 19-percent increase).
  • While a mere three percent won’t challenge the top of the table, PXG was chosen 69 percent more often than last time.

At 33 percent (an uptick of 20 percent), Titleist again was chosen by the highest percentage of respondents as the golf company that most embodies integrity. PING dropped to second with 27 percent while Mizuno significantly overperformed its size, finishing a strong third with 16 percent.

Other Notables

  • Finishing fourth and fifth respectively, Callaway and TaylorMade saw year-over-yearf percentage gains.
  • None of the Above ranked sixth.
  • While the percentage share remains a tick below three, PXG was chosen 109 percent more often than last time.

Titleist retained the top spot with 35 percent of responses, up 26 percent from our last survey. Mizuno remains a strong second despite a 15-percent drop.

Other Notables

  • Callaway finished fourth while increasing its share of responses by nearly 20 percent.
  • Despite moving up in other parts of the survey, TaylorMade was effectively flat at about 5.5 percent.
  • Defying social media commentary, PXG finished sixth after being chosen 16 percent more often than last time.

Titleist overtook PING for the top spot after being chosen by a third of all respondents. That’s a 22-percent gain from last time. PING moved down one spot while Mizuno held on to third. Both brands saw double-digit decreases YOY.

Other Notables

  • Both Callaway and TaylorMade saw percentage gains with Callaway ticking up 26 percent from survey to survey.
  • At three percent, None of the Above finished sixth.
  • We’re dealing with exceedingly small numbers here but PXG’s increase from .89 percent to 2.34 represents a 163-percent uptick from the previous survey.

TaylorMade claimed the top spot with 26 percent, up 23 percent from last time. PXG finished second with 20 percent of respondents choosing the brand.

Other Notables

  • COBRA finished fourth despite a 45-percent dip.
  • Titleist (eight percent) moved into to the top five for the first time ever after being selected 73 percent more often than in our previous survey
  • While not a top-five finisher, Mizuno saw an increase of nearly eight percent.

Premium was added to this survey for the first time in 2020. As prices have risen, “premium” and all its various qualifiers (extra-, ultra-, uber-, etc.) have become the equipment industry’s buzzwords du jour. The price might be high but it’s not excessive if a product is premium, right?

With that said, Titleist was chosen as the most premium brand in golf by a commanding 45 percent of respondents, up 40 percent from our previous survey. Mizuno was next, chosen by 16 percent of respondents.

Other Notables

  • As the company that arguably leans the hardest on “premium”, Callaway’s share of responses grew by 27 percent, though it was only selected by five percent of respondents overall.
  • PXG was chosen by 14 percent. While that’s good enough for third overall, it’s a drop of 54 percent which almost certainly reflects the dramatic shift in its pricing model.

I suppose a “humble” golf brand is one that goes about its business in a straightforward way without making ostentatious claims or trumpeting every victory as if it’s conclusive proof of superiority.

PING was chosen as the industry’s most humble brand by half of a percentage point over Mizuno. Both accounted for just over 23 percent of responses.

Other Notables

  • Srixon/Cleveland was third (11 percent).
  • Of the big brands, TaylorMade was selected least often, which I guess makes it the least humble among the Big 5.
  • Of the rest, PXG was selected least often. While just a bit over one percent of you view the brand as humble, it’s a 218-percent uptick from our previous survey.

Moving On To The Negative

With the happy vibes out of the way, let’s move on to the second part of the survey.

It’s safe to assume that nobody in the golf equipment industry seeks to associate themselves with anything that might carry a negative connotation but, in the spirit of the quote that was part of the inspiration for this survey (“Brands are not just what they say they are. Brands are what consumers say they are.”), every brand must understand that what consumers think about them isn’t always flattering.

While “hype” often has a negative connotation, I’d argue it’s only bad if you can’t back it up. Regardless, TaylorMade was chosen as the company most associated with hype. The company received 34 percent of the vote. The nine-point bump from our last survey was enough for it to narrowly move past PXG (33 percent) for the top spot.

Other Notables

  • Callaway was a distant third with 12 percent, a 27-percent dip from last year).
  • None of the Above was chosen fifth, at a 30-percent higher rate than in our last survey.
  • Of the large brands, PING was selected least often with less than two percent of you associating the brand with hype.

Similar to “hype”, it could be argued that a “gimmick “is only bad as it works. Still, if golfers believe something is a gimmick, we’re less likely to buy it.

With that said, 33 percent of you selected the None of the Above option which should probably be considered a positive for the industry as a whole. PXG finished first among brands with 29 percent of you associating the brand with “Gimmick.”

Other Notables

  • TaylorMade was third at 12 percent, down nine percent from our last survey.
  • Among smaller brands, Tour Edge led the pack, chosen eight percent of the time.
  • Mizuno was selected by fewer than .3 percent of respondents.

Marketing isn’t inherently bad. Every company markets its products one way or another but, in the golf equipment industry, consumers often see marketing as the thing that loots R&D budgets and creates higher retail prices.

Our readers chose TaylorMade as No. 1 for marketing. The company received 40 percent of the responses which is actually a sizeable (13.5 percent) decrease from our last survey. Callaway was second, though it also dropped by 17 percent.

Other Notables

  • PXG was the big mover. In third, with 17 percent, it was selected 149 percent more often than in our previous survey.
  • PING (less than two percent) was the only large brand to finish below None of the Above.
  • Wilson was last (.2 percent) which might suggest that a lack of marketing could explain where it finished elsewhere in the survey (that’s foreshadowing, people).

In the golf equipment world, everyone wants to be a leader, but not every brand is.

You select Wilson as the golf equipment industry’s biggest follower. The company was chosen by a quarter of respondents, a staggering increase of 109 percent from our last survey. COBRA was surprisingly second at 11 percent, a change of 27% from our last time.

Other Notables

  • Tour Edge was third, less than a percentage point behind COBRA.
  • TaylorMade (4.5 percent) and PING (five percent) were selected least often among big brands.
  • Mizuno was selected least often.

There’s no positive spin to be put on “deceptive”, but the good news is that None of the Above was chosen by 46 percent of respondents. PXG (15  percent) was picked most often by those who selected a brand.

Other Notables

  • TaylorMade was third at about 13 percent, a 12-percent decrease from the previous survey.
  • Callaway and COBRA round out the top five.
  • Titleist, Mizuno and PING were selected least often—all below 1.5 percent.

Some things just aren’t as good as others. We all accept that, though I’d expect no company wants to be thought of as “inferior.”

Fortunately, I suppose, 31 percent of you don’t believe any brand is worthy of the description.

Among the brands, Wilson was selected most often (26 percent, down eight percent from last time), followed by Tour Edge (12 percent, up 17 percent).

Other Notables

  • COBRA was next, chosen 20 percent of the time, up 17 percent YOY.
  • PXG was selected 92 percent more often, though only five percent in total.
  • Callaway (2.2 percent), TaylorMade (1.5), Titleist (1.1), Mizuno (< one) and PING (<one) made up the bottom of the table.

While it’s hard to put a positive spin on “dishonest”, the upside is that two-thirds of you don’t believe any brand is inherently dishonest.

Among the remaining 34 percent of responses, PXG was chosen most often at 11 percent.

Other Notables

  • TaylorMade, Callaway and COBRA round out the top five.
  • Srixon/Cleveland, PING and Mizuno were chosen least often (all well below one percent).

Wilson again topped the table, receiving 29 percent of selections (an increase of 17 poinnts from the previous survey). None of the Above was next with 15 percent.

Other Notables

  • COBRA was sixth and was selected 76 percent more often than our previous survey.
  • Callaway dropped to seventh, down 10 percent.
  • Titleist and TaylorMade were selected least often. Both dipped by more than 35 percent relative to the previous survey.

You would expect “arrogant” would produce nearly opposite results as “humble” and that’s petty close to what happened.

PXG was chosen by 36 percent of golfers as the most arrogant golf brand. On a positive note, that’s a 15-percent dip from the previous survey. Titleist was next at 18 percent, a small dip from last time.

Other Notables

  • TaylorMade and None of the Above were next at 15 percent each.
  • Callaway was the only other brand above 10 percent.
  • Wilson was selected least often with less than .1 percent choosing the brand.

“Cheap” can simply mean “inexpensive.” It can also be of inferior quality, i.e., trash.

Thirty-five percent of you chose Tour Edge. That’s likely split between those who appreciate prices below industry averages and others who question the quality of the company’s budget-range products. Wilson was next, chosen by 32 percent of voters.

Other Notables

  • None of the Above was chosen by 20 percent of voters.
  • PXG was fourth. While 3.5 percent isn’t a massive number, it’s a 935-percent increase from the previous survey.
  • “Premium” brands—TaylorMade, Callaway, PING, Mizuno and Titleist—round out the bottom of the table with each receiving less than one percent of votes.

Trends in the Data

This year’s results reveal some interesting trends, and while it’s difficult to know why readers voted the way they did, we have some ideas.

Mizuno continues to outkick its coverage.

Despite being, at best, a mid-sized golf company, Mizuno rates highly where similarly sized brands don’t hit the board. Simply put, the awareness and reputation of the brand far exceeds its size.

Titleist Trending Up

While, for the most part, Titleist has never ranked poorly in our surveys, it moved up the charts for several positives and down for some negatives. Maybe it’s the reputation of the Pro V1 and a string of mostly excellent results in Ball Lab, though I suspect a good bit of the boost can be credited to a rapidly improving metalwoods lineup that’s now as good as anything on the market.

COBRA Trending Down

A bit like Mizuno, COBRA has typically performed well in our surveys. However, this time around, we saw significant dips in the positives and increases in the negatives.

Our best theory is that ONE Length isn’t the new hot-ish thing anymore and it’s perhaps time for something different with the metalwoods. I’d also wager that Rickie not playing well, Bryson is less popular than ever and with no other PGA TOUR star to fill the void, consumer perception of the brand is slipping.

PXG Trending in All Directions

No company has transformed itself more dramatically since our last survey than PXG. In 2020, among brands of any real consequence, it established itself as the industry’s extra-ultra-uber-premium. Two years later, while a few high-priced offerings remain, the company arguably offers the best value in golf.

While leading the league in “arrogance” and finishing bottom of the table for “humble” undoubtedly isn’t where the company wants to be, it hit the board a few times for our “positive” words and didn’t fare as badly as last time for some “negative” words. Perhaps more important than any other metric, in general, PXG came to mind more often than in any previous running of this survey.

Wilson Needs Some Inspiration

The company was bottom-of-mind for all of our “positive” associations (it rated last for every positive other than “integrity” and “trustworthy”). There have been some bright spots in recent years (we’ve had Wilson irons, wedges and putters perform well in Most Wanted testing) but whatever buzz came out of Driver Versus Driver is gone and there aren’t any strong signs of positive momentum.

 

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Cody

      1 year ago

      This survey seems to be heavily persuaded by the biases of My Golf Spy.. Which is fine. But calling this a honest survey seems a bit off.

      My Golf Spy likes Ping. So it is highly recognized in this survey but, as far as actual equipment and perception in the market in stores. They are considered stale, behind, and under delivering.

      My Golf Spay is not really a fan of Callaway. But the reality is that Callaway has the largest R&D team in the industry. Yet here they are not considered innovative? That’s funny.. I could go on. It is an interesting survey and I participated in it but to draw any real or accurate conclusions is really not possible from this survey based on who created it and the sample population..

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      Last time I looked, Tony & the rest of the MGS staff didn’t fill out this survey, MGS readers did. I thought the server was flawed and certain ways, but the answers are what they are. It’s just the opinions of people, there’s no right or wrong answers. Based on the survey & other things I read, MGS folks tend to be on the snobby side (I sent someone quit the game rather than play a Wilson club!).

      Reply

      Gerry T

      1 year ago

      They’re likely more up on PXG than Cobra….but if the perception is the ideal, I think there is the reality that some brands will never be in our Golf bags. PxG and Mizuno for me. So will a survey of this nature reflect a true and honest assessment. It depends who you talk with. In an Era when amateurs tend to scoff at price gouging and ignore financial responsibility…I see brand loyalty as a key focus for those of us who are traditional players. I take surveys like this with a grain of salt because the only one who really knows what works best is you and me. When people follow the masses…the M is silent.

      Reply

      Chet

      1 year ago

      I have to agree with you Cody. If you read a publication that continually says PING is innovative. PING is innovative. PING is innovative. And then that same publication asks you who is innovative…. What did they think you’d say?

      I also think this is a weird survey for a group that doesn’t take perception or appearance into account when evaluating equipment. On the one hand they tell me that it doesn’t matter what people think, it only matters how something performs. It doesn’t matter what something “looks” like. Then on the other hand they publish a big survey of what people think and how people see things… Seems weird.

      Overall perception is perception. I might suggest that if you literally took the next PING driver to come out and painted Wilson on it people would condemn it. If you took the next Wilson driver and painted PING on it people would rave about it. It generally takes a long time to change an perception.

      Reply

      Chris Nickel

      1 year ago

      Performance and perception aren’t mutually exclusive.

      Performance, when tested correctly, isolates variables and gives consumers unbiased, data driven information.

      We also know that perception, while inherently more subjective, is a key determinant of consumer behavior.

      I’m not sure how providing more holistic information is “weird” though I do understand why some readers struggle to be able to separate the two.

      Lance Link

      1 year ago

      Part of Wilson’s problem is the way it goes to market, at least in Australia. Limited to a couple of retailers, typically not found at course pro shops. Shame. Ongoing decline of a one-time giant. Nothing wrong with product, even if not
      most innovative. Under invests in its sales-marketing efforts.

      Reply

      Mike P

      1 year ago

      I am intrigued how a performance brand is not viewed as an innovator. How do you outperform without innovating.

      Otherwise, The data illustrates a variety of ideas and themes each brand marketing team needs to recognize. 10,000 respondents is likely material and significant.

      Which leads to statistical significance as a technical term that the survey authors need to research. Contact your local college university math dept and ask for a statistics specialist who can help parse the data..

      After learning about statistical significance as a technical term, then give feedback on the metrics .
      Over simplified statistical significance is the idea things that look different are not, and things that look the same are in fact different. Highly technical beyond scale scope of this forum.

      And as another member noted, lot of people gave feedback based on PERCEPTIONS rather than experiences

      Reply

      mackdaddy9

      1 year ago

      You know it is hard to know what to say about companies you have never played. I doubt to many of the negative PXG votes come from people that have hit their gear. Same for many of the other brands.

      Reply

      Morse

      1 year ago

      Agreed. Wilson doesn’t get much love on this survey, but it’s probably because most haven’t tried their equipment. Anyone who has hit their Staff Model blades knows that they are probably one of the best clubs out there. I play their Staff Model wedges, and for me, they are wonderful. I currently play Mizuno MP-20 HMBs, and I love them. That said, if I were making a change, I’d seriously consider the Staff Model blades, or the Staff Model CB irons.

      Reply

      Marcus

      1 year ago

      I would’ve love to see Srixon and Cleveland separated in these kind of survey. Although they belong to SRI as well as XXIO, they are two completely different brand, different approaches, different target audiences and different product focuses.

      Reply

      Gerry T

      1 year ago

      I am very surprised to see Cobra dropping in various categories. I have been a huge fan of Cobra for the past 4 years or so and the confidence I find putting Cobra clubs in my golf bag only grows! PXG is overrated to the point of overkill and making me throw up. I not only play Cobra Speedzone 5-GW, but I am in the process of getting an all graphite set of F9s. If Cobra is losing anything…I am not seeing that happening in my situation. I am playing my best golf in years, thanks to Cobra and their F9/Speedzone irons. Also I am moving back from a Speedzone Xtreme driver back to an F9 driver! Life is good!

      Reply

      Johnny

      1 year ago

      I think your post sums it up, you`re moving backwards a generation looking for quality, the Radspeed and LTDx lineups have been failures to progress the brand, they look and feel like re-hashing the F9`s, so, 4 years later and they are producing minor tweeks doesn`t inspire confidence in the brand going forward.

      Also, no notable PGA tour players using their clubs doesn`t really help the image of the brand.

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      Just because Cobra hasn’t an introduced anything earth-shattering doesn’t mean they’re regressing. Maybe that stuff was just good to start with and they’re just tweaking it. I would challenge you to find any year-over-year OEM new drivers that will drastically change 99% of people’s games. If you get fitted & that $600 drive you bought goes 25 yards longer than your old driver, there was definitely something wrong with your old driver!

      And re pros not playing cobra, who cares? Your game isn’t in the same stratosphere as theirs, why would you worry about having the same equipment? I just purchased 3 PXG hybrids, they tested better than my TaylorMades. And I bought 3 for less than the cost of two OEM hybrids.

      Gerry T

      1 year ago

      Actually Tom Olavsky and his team just need to go back to the traditional lofts like they had in the F9s. The Speedzones had the right design with ideal engineering improvements. By the way, TaylorMade is just as guilty of jacking up lofts. One of their SGI irons carries a 43 degree pitching wedge. So before one is quick to attack Cobra for something other OEM equipment companies are doing. And it appears TaylorMade doesn’t come out with new clubs every month. I’m sure that Cobra will improve it’s focus while continuing to streamline their design improvements.

      TheBrad

      1 year ago

      Have you ever tried anything from PXG? Like legit tried it out? If not then don’t even mention them in your rambling post.

      Reply

      Gerry T

      1 year ago

      I have never been a PXG fan. I know some who tried their clubs but nobody I know swears by them…maybe at them. I played some of my best golf with the Speedzone irons and want the traditional feel of the F9s. I heard a lot about the Radspeed and in fact just sold my tour F9 3 wood in favor of my newer Radspeed 4/5 wood. I think all that Cobra needs to do is go back to the basics of what worked in the F9s and the Speedzone irons and refine things. 42.5 degree pitching wedge and a 48 degree gap wedge are okay. 43 and 48 would be closer to what TaylorMade is doing. Or maybe tinker with slight design changes but continue with the F9 and Speedzone lines in their irons. I see lots of LTDx irons on Kijiji…Likely the 41 or 41.5 degree pitching wedge needs to be rebranded and there’s no need to jack up the lofts beyond what the Speedzones have. Go with whatever worked before. The F6 irons were better than the F7s. The F9s were better than the F8s. KISS principle is the key!

      Joe Domill

      1 year ago

      great survey, at the rate prices are going up all the time expensive could have been added. the clubs are way too expensive for average working person.

      Reply

      Todd Tschantz

      1 year ago

      How much does a golf company have to sell to be included? XXIO was not an option in this survey, but sold something like $365million in equipment last year.

      Reply

      Marcus

      1 year ago

      XXIO is a brand of Srixon

      Reply

      Dick

      1 year ago

      Should have included “expensive” as a category!

      Reply

      Gerry T

      1 year ago

      That’s what keeps me from even wasting my time on PXG and rhe like. If you can drive a sporty SUV over a Lamborghini, and enjoy it,, why pay more for the same results? Technology is what it is…and it won’t be long before a 19 degree 5 iron shows up in amateur golf bags. I would wonder then once 4 irons become obsolete, can’t retailers include a matching sand wedge too? What’s with limiting to 7 piece sets?

      Reply

      Ron W

      1 year ago

      It’s hard to make any real sense out of these “one-word” type surveys. They (the results) are rarely objective (We all have our favourite brands) Just my opinion, but I wouldn’t make any golf equipment decisions based on these results.

      Just as case in point, as examples, some of the results show that it really has nothing to do with the equipment itself but rather the brand and their marketing strategies. Cobra doesn’t do well because Rickie is not playing well and Bryson is unpopular. Taylormade excels because of their new “Carbon-woods”, Titleist is “Premium” mainly because of their price-point….

      Anyway, it was an interesting exercise, and I commend Tony in trying to establish reasons for these trends. Love MSG for their fact/data-based research, but as to what people’s (subjective) opinions are, don’t really rate them.

      Reply

      Wilson Player

      1 year ago

      The no putts given on the topic was great,
      A little more insight on the declines this year for some.

      Cobra and Callaway didn’t have much new to show or sell this year. Mostly revisions to old tech. Not much marketing either.

      Great equipment from both, but not the attention they deserve.

      Reply

      Johnny

      1 year ago

      These one word answer surveys are not there for people to use as a buying guide, but rather to demonstrate how the general market perceives things.

      a year on year survey and results can demonstrate how the market perceives a brand, titleist took a big bump, could be attributable to quality showings, quality products, or the fact that several major YouTubers are using the T100`s and doing reviews of them (I can think of 3 that I watch that switched)

      Is this worthwhile for us, the average consumer? not really…. should brands be doing this types of surveys? damn straight they should, it shows who your market is, and how you can penetrate new market segments.

      Reply

      Willie T

      1 year ago

      No surprises from what I can see in this survey. I hate that the one legacy brand still out there, Wilson, looks to be slipping into “once was”. The perception is definitely that they are barley 3rd class when it comes to higher end golf gear. Maybe they can turn it around, and sadly I don’t have a single Wilson club in the bag.

      Reply

      RT

      1 year ago

      I dare say most of the remarks about Wilson were from those who have never picked up a Wilson club let alone played them …
      Yes Wilson has had its’ battle with ownership changes and players over the last few years but their product is every bit as good as those on this list.. Their Driver has had it’s up and downs but Irons,, Wedges ,Putters, ,hybrids are as good as any….. Give ’em a try you will be impressed..

      Reply

      Don Banks

      1 year ago

      I would have LOVED to participate in this Brand name survey, however this is the very first time I’ve seen anything about it. Who was asked to join this survey and why did I knot see anything in my email about it.
      Anyway, for what it’s worth, I have probably had at least 8 of those brands in my golf bag at various times and probably played at least 25 different brands of gold balls. and all I can say, as an average senior golfer who has been a scratch golfer in the past, Titleist is much like Budweiser, Nike, McDonalds, etc. — overhyped, over-advertised, flooding the market and used by many who don’t even know there are other brands. I know everyone is different and everyone swings a golf club differently, but Titleist ranks about 5th in my golf life.

      Reply

      Chris Nickel

      1 year ago

      Everyone on our email list was notified of the survey – and I believe it was promoted via our social media channels as well.

      Reply

      Gerry T

      1 year ago

      Same here Don…no wonder Cobra did so poorly. Every golf club manufacturer has their own faults. PXG design reminds me more of garden and farm implements. Not a huge fan of those either.

      Reply

      Wilson Player

      1 year ago

      Always interesting to see how people perceive brands.
      PXG is certainly one of those love it or hate it groups.

      Every time I find a hater I ask the same question- “have you ever tried them”.
      The answer has always been NO”
      The next thing I do is hit my ball past theirs.

      Reply

      Tom54

      1 year ago

      The biggest takeaway for me is that no matter your opinion, people know who PXG is, and they’re well known enough for people to elicit opinions. Better to be that then ones like Wilson or Bridgestone that unfortunately don’t garner any response. I’ve never played PXG clubs but I’ve demoed irons several times and have always been pleased with how I hit them. And every time I see their Gen 5 driver at the $300 price point, I always think to myself there’s no way the TM Stealth can be twice as good at twice the price.

      Reply

      Wilson Player

      1 year ago

      I always encourage people to give them a try. The deals are crazy good for some really good equipment.
      Check out the website, see if they have a fitting location near you and do it.
      I think it is only $25 for a full bag, 90 minute fitting on trackman. If nothing else you can see how a well fit club works for your swing.
      I picked up so much yardage and consistancy by the fitting with the new clubs and My Ball combo

      Mike

      1 year ago

      It isn’t. Although it is tough to demo a PXG club if you’re not located near one of their fitting centers. To me, that has to be the reason why more folks don’t play their clubs. I just bought 3 PXG hybrids & ended up paying much less than what only 2 OEM hybrids would have cost me.

      Mike

      1 year ago

      Fully agree. The PSG fittings I’ve been to have been among the most comprehensive ever (didn’t buy a driver, did buy hybrids). I love how PXG scored high in the hype / gimmick categories (which are usually perceived as negative). Yet idiots will still lay out $600 for an OEM driver that will absolutely, positively give them no more benefit than the one PXG sells for half the price.

      Reply

      Randy Loper

      1 year ago

      I took the survey and even though I did not vote exactly as the charts show I am truly impressed with the data shown. I look at the data and heard myself say on every chart “That is spot on”. Thanks for putting it together.

      Reply

      TailWagger

      1 year ago

      Given the more affordable nature of PXG offerings these days., I suspect that, as with myself, they’ve wound up in the hands of more golfers this year, particularly so as one only had to wait a week or so as opposed to half a season to get a set of clubs, as was the case with several other brands in looked at this year. I do wonder if the rather schizophrenic nature of the PXG results reflects the split between folks who’ve actually hit them as opposed to those who still view them as ludicrously overpriced or simply find their advertising efforts a bit crass.

      Reply

      DAVID E BASSETT

      1 year ago

      Outstanding survey. Very well done, very understandable, very helpful..

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.