Ball Lab: 2022 Bridgestone Tour B RX
Golf Balls

Ball Lab: 2022 Bridgestone Tour B RX

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Ball Lab: 2022 Bridgestone Tour B RX

MyGolfSpy Ball Lab is where we quantify the quality and consistency of the golf balls on the market to help you find the best ball for your money. Today, we’re taking a look at the 2022 Bridgestone Tour B RX. To learn more about our test process, how we define “bad” balls, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

About the Bridgestone Tour  B RX

A closeup image of the Reactiv IQ cover of the Bridgestone TOUR B RX golf ball

While the TOUR B RX doesn’t get any love on the PGA TOUR, it has been Lexi Thompson’s ball of choice of late. Made famous by Matt Kuchar’s dad, Bridgestone classifies the TOUR B RX as for golfers with speeds below 105.

It’s no secret that we’re not fans of compression-based ball fitting but what you should take from that is that the RX trends to the soft side and with that comes a bit higher flight and lower spin than the “over 105” offerings.

Bridgestone Tour B RX Construction

Like everything else in the Bridgestone TOUR B lineup, the RX has three-piece construction. It offers a 338-dimple injection-molded urethane cover with REACTIV IQ technology. The Bridgestone TOUR B RX is produced at the company’s factory in Covington, Ga.

Compression

a bridgestone TOUR B RX golf ball in the MyGolfSpy Ball Lab compression gauge

On our gauge, the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RX has an average compression of 79. That’s six points firmer than the previous model and puts it alongside balls like the OnCore Vero X1, Srixon Z-Star and Titleist Velocity (two-piece ionomer).

Across the market as a whole, it qualifies as a “medium feel” golf ball, though it’s definitely on the softer side among balls with urethane covers.

Diameter and Weight

A bridgestone TOUR B RX golf ball on being weighed on our Ohaus electronic balance.

I don’t recall any issues with Bridgestone balls as they relate to USGA regulations. As a rule, the company doesn’t flirt with the size limit the way some of its competitors do (Bridgestone TOUR B balls run slightly larger than other Tour offerings) and, save a single ball in our 2022 TOUR B XS sample, weight isn’t an issue, either.

In the case of the RX, all of the sample adhered to USGA rules for both weight and diameter.

Inspection

Centeredness and Concentricity

For the most part, Bridgestone does a good job with layer concentricity. I won’t say we never find any issues but they are few and far between.

In the case of the TOUR B RX, we found a single ball with a concentricity issue sufficient enough for us to flag the ball as bad.

Core Consistency

a closeup image of the core of a Bridgestone TOUR B RX golf ball

Core consistency and color were consistent throughout the sample. We found nothing of concern.

Cover

While we didn’t find anything significant enough to flag as bad, we noted that some balls had more of a texture to the cover than others. We also found a couple of balls (isolated to Box 2) where dimples at the poles were slightly raised.

Finally, we also noted a couple of balls where there were minor imperfections/indentations where the two halves of the cover come together.

While notable, nothing was so significant that we flagged any balls as bad.

Bridgestone TOUR B RX – Consistency

In this section, we detail the consistency of the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RX. Our consistency metrics provide a measure of how similar the balls in our sample were to one another relative to all of the models we’ve tested to date.

a chart showing the ball lab measurements for the 2002 Bridgestone TOUR B RX golf ball

Weight Consistency

  • Weight consistency for the Tour B RX falls within the average range.
  • Box 3 was a tick heavier overall but not significantly.
  • In terms of the market as a whole, we would consider the Bridgestone TOUR B RX to be of average weight.

Diameter Consistency

  • Diameter consistency for the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RX falls within the Average range.
  • The size of the balls falls within the Average range relative to the market as a whole.

Compression Consistency

  • Compression consistency falls within the Poor range and is a significant reason for the below-average overall score.
    • In many respects, it mirrors what we found when we tested the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B XS.
  • The spread of compression was similar across all three boxes but two balls (one in Box 1 and one in Box 2) were flagged for having compression values significantly lower than the sample median.
  • The compression delta across the entire sample was 20 points. For the sake of comparison, that’s more of a spread than we’d expect to find between the TOUR B RX and a TOUR B X.

True Price

True Price is how we quantify the quality of a golf ball. It's a projection of what you'd have to spend to ensure you get 12 good balls.

The True Price will always be equal to or greater than the retail price. The greater the difference between the retail price and the True Price, the more you should be concerned about the quality of the ball.

Bridgestone TOUR B RX – Summary

To learn more about our test process, how we define “bad” balls and our True Price metric, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

As we mentioned, the results largely mirror what we found when we tested the 2022 TOUR B XS. Significant defects were few, diameter and weight consistency were average, but compression across the sample was wildly inconsistent.

The Good

  • Average diameter and weight consistency
  • Only one bad ball not related to compression issues

The Bad

  • Significantly inconsistent compression across the sample.

At the time of review, the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RX gets an overall grade of 59.

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS


Amount

Frequency

For You

For You

News
Apr 22, 2024
Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
Golf Balls
Apr 22, 2024
Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
Golf Technology
Apr 21, 2024
Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Parsong

      9 months ago

      Thanks for the review. Someone needs to get Tiger up to speed and tell him what an awful ball he is using. I probably need to pay better attention also since I have started playing them and love them. However, they have not lowered my single digit hdcp yet.

      Reply

      Tim

      2 years ago

      Is Bridgestone the new Callaway in terms of crappy ball manufacturing?

      Reply

      John J.

      2 years ago

      What would be interesting is if they find a ball that is “out of spec”, if they could do some performance testing with it and one that was “in spec” to show how it impacts performance. I know they don’t have access to the robot all the time, but maybe Harry could go hit a few and report back.

      Reply

      MLJ

      2 years ago

      I’m sure they have an indoor sim and they could hit balls themselves. But that would be too much work.

      And answer yourself this. Do you HONESTLY think Tiger would associate with a ball mfg that had 20% variances in compression? I call BullSh@t on this test. My guess is, Reactiv is screwing with their measurements. But again, that would require them to ask BStone a follow up.

      Reply

      John J.

      2 years ago

      I think these ball lab reviews are more about the manufacturer than they are about the ball itself. Seems like if one of the manufacturers balls does not test well, then you can pretty much assume that none of them will.

      With that said, evaluating the construction of the ball without also including the performance seems to be unreliable.

      And until a new performance test of the “new” releases of many of the balls, the old performance data seems to be questionable.

      Reply

      Dan

      2 years ago

      I don’t understand the need to evaluate the performance of the ball? Their stated (often) goal of ball lab is to judge the consistency of the ball, not the performance. It’s probably MORE useful honestly. You are likely not to find the right ball for you from a robot test, but it’s nice to know if ball 7 is going to be close to ball 17 and ball 27 and not 20 percent softer. Even a ball that treats well for you is likely to not work well if the next ball is grossly off center or much different compression.

      Reply

      Jay

      2 years ago

      How does the variance in compression translate to performance factors like spin and distance? Debating what to do with the remainder of my 3-dozen box of these balls, but I’ll probably switch to Pro V1 or maybe AVX.

      Reply

      WBN

      2 years ago

      I’ve been playing the B RX for the last few years and have no complaints. The only other ball I play is the Titleist AVX. Both balls fit my less than 105 mph swing speed. The rating of 59 seems awfully low. Thanks for the review.

      Reply

      Peejer

      2 years ago

      Have to admit I was surprised by the quality of the Bridgestone Tour B RX ball. Always appreciate the Ball Reviews from MyGolfSpy!

      Reply

      Tag

      2 years ago

      Is there a way to measure the consistency of how a ball rolls when putted?

      Reply

      MJL

      2 years ago

      Can’t go to MGS without a Titleist add popping up. Keep cashing those click checks.

      Reply

      Chris Nickel

      2 years ago

      This might be a bad time to tell you, but those ads you’re seeing from Titleist are filling based on your browser history and/or other traceable components of your online behavior.

      Reply

      MJL

      2 years ago

      So you earn NO revenue from those clicks? And yes, I play Bridgestone, and no, don’t surf Titleist site. I play most all Callaways…. And have nothing but TaylorMade and Titleist adds pop on your site. Be that as it may, link performance with Ball Lab results and you may…. may have something. Or perhaps get input from MFG’s on ball lab results (Callaway didn’t run from results). Other than that, you labeling a bad/good score without correlating performance data is subjective analysis. And perhaps the way you are measuring compression for BStone balls is incongruent to their Reactiv cover. Do you honestly think Tiger would play a ball from a MFG that would vary this greatly? Doubt it

      Mike

      2 years ago

      I’ve never had a Titleist ad pop up on the MSG site. Tons of other pop-up ads but not Titleist.

      With these ball tests, MGS just reports what they physically come across. I’m not sure what the direct correlation is to performance because you can’t put a ball back together & play it. A lot of personal preference goes into balls so naturally people get defensive if their favorite brand model is rated low. I really, really like these balls & will continue to play them regardless of this review because I feel they match my game really well. Doesn’t mean the test are bogus.

      Reply

      Russell

      2 years ago

      After reading this I will be trying out some Maxfli tours.

      Reply

      Les

      2 years ago

      Great… just what I wanted to see after buying a dozen.

      Reply

      Chris Nickel

      2 years ago

      Before you buy….MyGolfSpy

      Reply

      Lou

      2 years ago

      Once again, a ball test without any performance statistics. I find it absolutely amazing how so many MGS readers seem to rely on purchasing balls based on The Ball Lab results for roundness and perfect covers, etc. and not performance. This is the opposite of what I thought mattered.

      Reply

      Ray

      2 years ago

      It all mattets

      Reply

      Tyson

      2 years ago

      They have a done what you are asking in another piece. Very large, very comprehensive. You just haven’t bothered to look…

      Reply

      Javier

      2 years ago

      Tony,
      I’m curious if the react technology of this series really means anything. What I’m trying to say is, does the cover react differently to differing club conditions or speeds? The claim is that this material reacts differently with differing speeds. I know there are materials out which are soft and pliable when a slow acting force is applied, but as the force is applied faster the material acts differently, gets stiffer. I guess I’m wondering if the cover is that type of material.
      Thanks,
      Frozen Spy

      Reply

      Willie T

      2 years ago

      Slightly surprised at the lower overall rating. Would love to see how the weighting of the data points figure into to the overall rating. While I enjoy the reviews, in my mind I always know that the ubiquitous Pro-V1 (which also seems to be the most lost ball on the course) is the standard to which all lesser balls are measured.

      Reply

      Harvard Ykema

      2 years ago

      For the wide range in compression, there could easily be a big difference in distance from ball to ball which when chipping could make you do a wrong assessment and adjustment and get worse results on a different ball. Also even dirt on a ball can effect ball flight so to have different dimples or imperfections at joint means you really can’t trust your swing or dispersion results. Bridgestone not for me

      Reply

      Bud

      2 years ago

      Was wondering how this ball compares with chrome soft? Also doesn’t Bridgestone also have a RXS model? Has does this compare to that?

      Reply

      Golfinnut

      2 years ago

      So does it really conform to a golfer with less than 105 mph swing speed ?

      Reply

      Richard

      2 years ago

      That’s answered in the 2nd paragraph… MyGolfSpy doesn’t buy the lower compresson balls for golfers with lower speed fitting idea. They say fit for spin and/or flight trajectory instead.

      Reply

      Richard

      2 years ago

      One more comment – The performance test from August 2021 (link at the bottom of the article) showed that these balls are in the top 5 for distance, top 5 ball speed, and bottom 5 for driver spin – for players with 115mph swing speed. If I’m Bridgestone, I would proudly publish that data as a 3rd party test showing that this ball is great for high swing speed players looking for distance / fairways, and forget the ‘under 105 swing speed’ marketing line.

      Reply

      Terry

      2 years ago

      Thanks for the review. Tony. I never liked the Tour B RX balls compared to the B XS that I played for two plus years.. Side note: there seem to be typos in the first two paragraphs where Tour B and BX are used.

      Reply

      Steve S

      2 years ago

      Enjoy these ball lab articles. It would be interesting for a manufacturer to make a ball that was consistently at the upper limit of weight and the lower limit of diameter. That should make it the longest ball. If I remember correctly one of the Taylormade TP5’s fit that criteria a few years ago.

      Reply

      David

      2 years ago

      Phone’s ringing…

      It’s Bridgestone. They want to talk to the Boss.

      Reply

      Jeff

      2 years ago

      Of course i just placed an onli e order for 3 dozen Tour B RX after being fit into them to drop my driver spin.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 22, 2024
    Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
    Golf Balls
    Apr 22, 2024
    Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
    Golf Technology
    Apr 21, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.