Ball Lab: Mizuno RB Tour X Golf Ball Review (2023 model)
Golf Balls

Ball Lab: Mizuno RB Tour X Golf Ball Review (2023 model)

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Ball Lab: Mizuno RB Tour X Golf Ball Review (2023 model)

MyGolfSpy Ball Lab is where we quantify the quality and consistency of golf balls. Today, we’re reviewing the 2023 Mizuno RB Tour X. To learn more about our test process, click here.

About the Mizuno RB Tour X

The RB Tour X is one of two premium urethane offerings from Mizuno. At $43 per dozen, it doesn’t strike quite the same value proposition of many direct-to-consumer offerings, but it is $5-$10 less than competitive offerings from the industry leaders.

Mizuno says the 2023 RB Tour golf ball lineup is a significant upgrade over the prior generation. It has stepped up the quality while changing the performance specs. Both the previous RB Tour and RB Tour X were what we would classify as excessively high-spin balls. Mizuno says the new balls don’t spin nearly as much and, while the RB Tour X is the higher-spinning off the two, Mizuno classifies it mid-spin (the RB Tour is classified as low-spin).

An image of the 2023 Mizuno RB Tour X golf ball.

Mizuno RB Tour X Construction

With the new RB Tour X golf ball, Mizuno has moved away from four-piece, dual-core construction. Suffice it to say we found some issues with the prior generation, so it’s not particularly surprising that Mizuno, like others in the industry, has moved away from dual-core construction entirely.

The 2023 RB Tour X features three-piece (single core) construction. The cover is TPU (injection-molded) urethane with a unique 272-dimple aerodynamic package.

While the balls are Mizuno-designed from cover to core, they’re produced in Vietnam by Feng Tay. In addition to its in-house RZN brand, the company also produces balls for other DTC brands.

Compression

A Mizuno RB Tour X golf ball being measured on MyGolfSpy's compression gauge.

On our gauge, the Mizuno RB Tour X has an average compression of 95. That’s the same general compression range as balls like the Callaway Chrome Soft X, Srixon Z-Star Diamond and XV (prior-gen) and the 2022 Bridgestone Tour B X.

By nearly any reasonable compression comparison, the RB Tour X qualifies as a firm ball.

Compression Comparison Chart

We’ve had several requests for a standalone compression comparison tool. As it turns out, that tool exists. We created it as part of our Golf Ball Compression FAQ page. At some point, we may merge the two charts but for now the plan is to include this chart in future Ball Labs.

Diameter and Weight

A Mizuno RB Tour X golf ball being weighed

All of the balls in Mizuno RB Tour X sample conformed to USGA rules for both diameter and weight.

A single ball in the sample failed to meet our standard for roundness. Accordingly, we flagged it as bad.

Inspection

Centeredness and Concentricity

We found no issues of note with regard to layer concentricity within our Mizuno RB Tour X sample. This appears to be an area of improvement over the prior version.

Core Consistency

the core of a Mizuno RB Tour X golf ball

The Mizuno RB Tour X isn’t particularly fun as far as coloring goes but we don’t give style or beauty points anyway. We did observe a bit of regrind in a healthy percentage of the sample. It’s common practice among two-piece balls to reuse a bit of inert material as filler. And while it is a bit less common in the premium space, it absolutely does happen and unless we see something weird on the gauges (which we didn’t) it isn’t cause for concern.

Cover

No cover defects were identified.

Mizuno RB Tour X – Consistency

In this section, we detail the consistency of the Mizuno RB Tour X. Our consistency metrics provide a measure of how similar the balls in our sample were to one another relative to all of the models we’ve tested to date.

A chart showing the ball by quality of the Mizuno RB Tour X golf balls

Weight Consistency

  • At the time of testing, weight consistency for the 2023 Mizuno RB Tour X falls within the average range (though only by a bit).
  • As you can see in the chart above, there was some clear variation between boxes.
    • In general, the RB Tour X qualifies as a light ball which isn’t necessarily ideal in the Tour space.

Diameter Consistency

  • Diameter consistency falls in the Average range.
  • While the sample was generally consistent, a single ball did not meet our standard for roundness.

Compression Consistency

  • Compression consistency falls on the higher end of the Average range.
  • The compression delta across the sample was only 7.8 points which is two points better than the current average.

True Price

True Price is how we quantify the quality of a golf ball. It's a projection of what you'd have to spend to ensure you get 12 good balls.

The True Price will always be equal to or greater than the retail price. The greater the difference between the retail price and the True Price, the more you should be concerned about the quality of the ball.

Summary

To learn more about our test process, how we define “Bad” balls and our True Price metric, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

A closeup of the Mizuno RB Tour X golf ball

Mizuno RB Tour X Golf Ball Quality Summary

From a quality perspective, the new Mizuno RB Tour X represents a significant upgrade over the original. The 2019 model rated as below average (five bad balls, overall score of 60) while the updated RB Tour X rates as well above.

The Good

  • Average quality across the board with concentricity defects
  • Compression consistency on the high end of the Average range
  • Impressively tight compression delta
  • Significant improvement over the original

The Bad

  • Weight consistency narrowly falls into the Average range.
  • Runs light for a Tour ball.

The Score

The True Price for the Mizuno RB Tour X is $44.22. That’s just a three-percent increase over the $42.99 retail price.

At the time of testing, the Mizuno RB Tour X golf ball receives a Ball Lab score of 84. That’s 11 points higher than the current average of 73.

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS


Amount

Frequency

For You

For You

News
Apr 22, 2024
Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
Golf Balls
Apr 22, 2024
Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
Golf Technology
Apr 21, 2024
Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Sam

      2 months ago

      Looking to see the difference between the RB Tour and RB Tour X. Hard to find information out there on the webs.
      Is there difference in compression between the two balls?

      Reply

      Phil Williams

      1 year ago

      For all of you who want to see every ball made tested in the ball test I went and looked the conforming ball list at the USGA is roughly 15 pages 75 pages long at 15 balls per page.. I did not do the math but the number of balls is astronomical, Way to many to test each one, The ball test is great kudos to MGS for testing as many as they do. Thanks MGS.

      Reply

      Patrick Drury

      1 year ago

      I am interested in the performance test results. I tried Mizuno balls about 3 years ago, liked them. Then tried them again last year, hated them. Not sure if I will try again without hearing the performance results.

      Reply

      WBN

      1 year ago

      You ststed that the ball had 272 dimples. Most balls on the market come in around 350 dimples. How much does this affect the flight? Does the ball stay in the air less due to the reduced number? Is it supposed to make the ball go straighter? Thanks.

      Reply

      Sandy

      1 year ago

      To answer the question posed, no I would not play this ball (unless I found one which is highly unlikely since probably very few people play it).

      Reply

      David

      1 year ago

      Everything Mizuno touches is first class.

      After 50+ years of golf, I always come back to Maxfli.

      Reply

      Charlie

      1 year ago

      I’m always interested in your product comparisons. But once again, you had no mention of Trust Golf balls. They are DTC and conforming, but never seem to be included.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      1 year ago

      They’re on the list. Not a highly requested ball, but I’m trying to work them in.

      Reply

      Andy T

      1 year ago

      I purchased 4 dozen Mizuno golf balls last year ( 2dz each of the Tour & Tour X). Found a good deal on them on golfballs.com, so figured I’d give them a try. While I liked the performance of both balls, I found that both balls were not very durable, cutting easily on wedge shots (kinda like balata balls used to cut, but not quite that soft). So IMO, the quality of the ball sucked. Has that changed since last year? Even so, I’ll probably stick with Srixon XV and the Maxfli Tour X moving forward. Your earlier reviews of the Maxfli Tour is what led me to try that ball, so I really appreciate the data and feedback you provide in these tests.

      Reply

      HornyG

      1 year ago

      You don’t have the same data for the 23 MaxFlis yet? Thanks

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      1 year ago

      Testing in progress.

      Reply

      PaulS

      1 year ago

      Mizuno included a sleeve of RB Tour in the box my new clubs were in. They seemed to perform about the same as my Maxfli Tours. But since that didn’t putt or float any better, I will stick with the Maxfli.

      Reply

      Chaplin

      1 year ago

      Yeah that’s not near enough to get me to consider switching from Maxfli Tours, or even to TRY these considering the cost divided by proven reputation.

      Reply

      Scott

      1 year ago

      You tested the RBTour X but not the RBTour?
      I thought you usually tested them at the same time

      Is the RB tour test coming at a later date?

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      1 year ago

      Yup. Probably would have done the standard first but there was a little shipping snafu with one of the retailers we ordered from. Last of the RB Tour came a little late.

      Reply

      Scott

      1 year ago

      Thanks
      Look forward to it

      Mark P

      1 year ago

      Mizuno says the new balls don’t spin as much, but what does MGS say about the new balls’ spin? Is there test data on that? Or trajectory, or feel, or distance? While these reviews are entertaining to read, most golfers are really not concerned about weight, core and cover defects. 0% of golfers will be able to tell a ball is “a bit” too heavy or slightly out of tolerance for diameter by .001 and say “well, hell, can’t play that one!”. As usual, the report misses the bigger picture of the ball characteristics golfers really care about.. But hey, people will read anything about golf and gets MGS web traffic, so I get it.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      1 year ago

      Mark, you seem angry for a guy missing the point. We have a robot test in the works for later this year. That’s where our performance data will come from.

      You inadvertently touched on why we do this. I think you’re right, I think many golfers won’t notice the differences caused by bad balls, manufacturing variations, etc. (though I wouldn’t be so bold as to put the number at 0%). The thing is, whether you notice it or not, those things – and the impact from shot to shot absolutely are real. So, even if you don’t notice it (I get that – I wish it were possible to 100% recreate a golf shot with a different ball or with the same ball in a different orientation, but alas, it isn’t), the quality of ball absolutely has an impact on your score.

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      These MGS tests, in my opinion, are merely to determine the quality aspect of balls, not whether any ball is better for a particular person. That’s for you, the golfer, to find out. I have played Chrome Soft almost from when they first came out to the present. I read the initial MGS Chrome Soft reviews.. Did I stop playing Chrome Softs? No, because they work for me and I never had a bad experience of a ball “malfunctioning” due to bad quality. However, the fact that Callaway retooled their lab for increased quality tells me that someone DID pay attention to the MGS review. So therefore, me, a Chrome Soft user, ultimately benefited from that MGS poor review.

      Brian Parkinson

      1 year ago

      You mention the robot test for performance data. Is it listed somewhere on the site for prior years? Can’t seem to find it.

      Ian

      1 year ago

      This is basically why I have stopped coming here. There is no real data and because of this no real useful information for the average consumer.

      Reply

      Christopher

      1 year ago

      I think we’re mixing up performance versus manufacturing consistency. They’re two separate things. It’s not if a ball suits your game it’s if that ball suits your game is it worth buying or is it worth looking at another ball that performs the same, but has higher manufacturing consistencies?

      Performance data is great, but if the best ball for you is great for 8-9 out of a dozen and the other 3-4 are eggs (relatively speaking), wouldn’t you want to know? and go looking for the perfect dozen?

      Yes, the data is dry, but once you have performance data, wouldn’t a quick look at whether the ball consistently plays that way useful knowledge?

      Cody

      1 year ago

      Quality control isn’t important to the consumer? This is far more important than a test on most flight characteristics since those vary dramatically from person to person, based on their swing. You’re completely missing the point, but what else is new from a loudmouth on the internet…

      David

      1 year ago

      It’s data. Do what you want with it.
      A scientific look. Period.
      Give a premium ball to a high handicapper. and what will happen — nothing.

      bob

      1 year ago

      I play Mizuno irons, I would not play the Mizuno ball. I am probably missing the boat here but there are only three balls I would play. Titleist Pro-V, Srixon Z Star, Maxfli Tour X. I play Maxflis because the price is awesome, the performance is awesome and they are just as good as Pro-V’s. All other balls are just pretenders.

      Reply

      Gerry T

      1 year ago

      I don’t play anything Mizuno. I tried some irons similar to MP-57s. Anything Mizuno has done hasn’t impressed me. I was turned off to Mizuno player irons from my experience a few years back. Golf balls under the Mizuno name won’t find a home in my golf bag.

      Reply

      Tobias D

      1 year ago

      Very nice that Mizuno seems to not have given up on the premium ball space. I’ve been playing the RB Tour since mid-2020 and while I have noticed the occasional bad ball have been quite happy with them. I had struggled with high spin on my driver while I didn’t have the time to put in the short game hours to swap to a firm ball like the Tour B X. So I’m eagerly awaiting the Ball Lab for the new RB Tour as I’d quite like to stay with Mizuno if only for the “cool underground tech” factor … as long as it’s within reason and I’m not giving up too much performance.

      Reply

      Chris Proulx

      1 year ago

      I am playing the RB Tour balls so far this season and I’m really impressed. They have very similar carry numbers compared to Pro V1s when played on the same day. I don’t want a ball with more spin on the driver so I likely won’t play the Tour X version but anyone looking to save a few dollars would be pleased with the RB Tours IMO.

      Reply

      Brian Parkinson

      1 year ago

      Would it be possible to include a spin rate for the balls? Off a driver, a 7 iron or wedge? How about ball speeds for the same clubs at various swing speeds.

      I’m not sure the purpose of this ball lab other than to determine if balls meet certain quality standards. I’m far more interested in performance standards.

      Without performance metrics, ball labs seems silly. Like measuring the quality of golf clubs for most wanted, but not addressing the performance.

      Reply

      Mark P

      1 year ago

      Brian, agreed. MGS “ball lab tests” are just about useless. How about some info that golfers really care about like cover durability, trajectory and spin rate? No one cares about weight and circumference tolerance.

      Reply

      tproberts

      1 year ago

      since I am still high handicap I would not play this ball due to price….I still need to play with $20-$30 balls so for now I will stay withg Oncor Elexir

      Reply

      Alan

      1 year ago

      Given I received 7 bad balls in three dozen NEW prov1s I purchased, I may need to look to a new ball. These seem much improved over prior versions.

      Reply

      John O

      1 year ago

      Neither of your charts go up to 2023.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      1 year ago

      My bad. Fixed.

      I typically try and update the charts the night before so as to save me the trouble of forgetting to do it in the morning. This time, I went ahead and forgot.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 22, 2024
    Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
    Golf Balls
    Apr 22, 2024
    Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
    Golf Technology
    Apr 21, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.