Bridgestone Tour B Golf Balls with REACTIV Cover (2020)
Golf Balls

Bridgestone Tour B Golf Balls with REACTIV Cover (2020)

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Bridgestone Tour B Golf Balls with REACTIV Cover (2020)

Golf balls built for distance generally sacrifice some spin and balls built for spin generally sacrifice some distance. That’s been a universal truth since we started the new millennium. It’s also a truth the new 2020 Bridgestone Tour B golf balls with REACTIV Urethane may be sending the way of the wound balata.

The long-standing paradigm with tour-level balls has been for OEMs is to offer two models: the regular and the X. One model is softer, more spinny and a wee bit shorter; the other is firmer, less spinny and a wee bit longer.

Think Pro V1/Pro V1x, TP5/TP5X, Z-STAR/Z-STAR XV and you’ve got it.

Well, after a year’s worth of teasing, Bridgestone is ready to knock that paradigm on its ass. The new Tour B lineup may, in fact, really be the ball that changes the ball.

Bridgestone Tour B

Innovation vs. Renovation

Quick – name the biggest golf ball innovations over the past five years.

Time’s up.

If you said Truvis, Triple Track or whatever the hell TaylorMade is doing, thanks for playing. Those are cosmetic and visual and don’t do anything for ball speed, spin or any other performance metrics. Matte colors? Don’t think so.

Any major changes in golf ball performance over the past half-decade – maybe even longer – are all in specifications. OEMs pull different levers to make a ball softer or firmer to get more ball speed or more spin or softer feel and they can adjust dimple patterns for aerodynamics and ball flight. Those are all important but don’t represent any type of giant leap forward.

Bridgestone Tour B

Bridgestone, lest we forget, is a $30+billion tire and rubber giant with more than 900 polymer engineers on staff. Last year, this corporate behemoth spent $930 million on research and development into rubber technology. Bridgestone Golf is part of that machine with more than 800 golf ball patents and a satchel-full of innovations including:

  • 1994 – The Precept EV Extra Spin, one of the first solid-core balls used on the PGA TOUR and one that made Nick Price a lot of money.
  • 2000 – the Nike Tour Accuracy TW Edition, made by Bridgestone for one Eldrick Tont Woods, revolutionized the solid-core, urethane-covered ball. Tiger won his Tiger Slam with that ball, including the U.S. Open by 15 strokes.
  • 2009 – the B330 RX, the first low-compression tour-level ball, one that, says Bridgestone, now has a parade of imitator/followers.

So, where do you go for innovation in 2020? Distance is compression and aerodynamics, spin is all about interacting layers, and the soccer-ball look is paint.

Bridgestone Tour B X

“Is there a way we can have a truly long golf ball?” asks Bridgestone Golf Ball Marketing Manager Elliot Mellow. “Not just long from a marketing standpoint, but truly longer from a performance standpoint on one end of the spectrum, and then via spin separation on the other end, can we have more control and feel to it?”

Distance and spin? That’s a conundrum all right and Bridgestone believes it has cracked the code to separate the two to enhance both. It’s called REACTIV Urethane®.

What Is REACTIV?

Unless you’re a chemist, chemical compounds look like a Wheel of Fortune clue badly in need of vowels. REACTIV is, essentially, an enhanced type of urethane that creates a kind of unicorn: a ball that is longer off the tee and has shot-stopping short-game spin, and a ball that spins likes crazy around the green but is still long and straight with the driver.

“This isn’t just rubbing a little pixie dust into the urethane and calling it something new,” says Mellow. “It’s a substantial change to the way the cover is made.”

Bridgestone Tour B Tiger ball

REACTIV is really two covers in one, with different compression times depending on what club you’re hitting it with.

“When the ball needs to be fast off the driver face, the compression time is quicker, initial velocity is higher and the ball moves faster,” says Mellow. “On the flip side, with an iron or wedge that’s moving more slowly, the compression time is actually longer. That allows the ball to take advantage of the loft and the grooves better.”

In simple terms – the cover reacts like a firm cover when you hit it with a driver and reacts like a soft cover when you hit it with a wedge.

“With traditional urethane, you can make a high-spinning ball by making the cover softer, but there’s a huge degradation in terms of velocity and distance with the driver,” says Mellow. “REACTIV customizes the impact times for each unique shot, each unique club, and each unique swing.”

Bridgestone Tour B

How unique is the material? In a demonstration video, Bridgestone simulates how REACTIV urethane is different from typical urethane by dropping round pellets made of each material onto a hard flat surface. The drop emulates the impact of a five- to 10-yard shot. The REACTIV urethane pellet hardly bounces. Instead, it deadens on impact and comes to a complete stop on the surface before the standard urethane pellet bounces a second time.

But if you were to drop the balls from a higher level to simulate a driver impact, the pellets would actually switch places, and the REACTIVE would have more bounce. It’s a stark contrast.

Performance Testing: What The…???

Here’s a statement that’s sure to raise an eyebrow or several. We had to confirm with Bridgestone twice to make sure we heard correctly. We did.

Here goes…

Bridgestone confirms that, across the board, with all four balls (the Tour B X, XS, RX, and RXS) and for all types of players, ranging from Tiger, Bryson and Kuchar to you, me and Wally the 23-handicap from down the street, they’ve seen the same performance results for everyone: roughly 1.5 MPH more ball speed with the driver and roughly 350 more RPM on a 15-yard pitch compared to the 2018 Tour B’s.

Bridgestone says its robot testing shows the same thing. This means the cover has the same effect on each ball in the Bridgestone Tour B lineup, regardless of its designed-for compression and spin characteristics and, regardless of who’s hitting it, their swing speed and their handicap.

Bridgestone Tour B XS

“That’s what’s been nuts,” says Mellow. “In the past, we’d say the XS spins more and we achieve that by manipulating a softer material. But the fact that all four balls have the exact same performance increase tested under all skill levels speaks about how unique the REACTIV material is.”

Let me write this again so you can read it again: in testing – using robots and real golfers – from 20-cappers off the streets of Atlanta swinging 85 MPH to Tiger and Bryson and their 120+ swing speeds, virtually everyone experienced a 1.5 MPH increase in driver ball speed and roughly 350 RPM more spin on a 15-yard pitch.

Oh yeah, we’re gonna have to test that.

Bridgestone Tour B XS

Chances are you or someone you know may have tested it already. Bridgestone has been aggressive in sending out “white box” prototypes to golfers for testing – more than 20,000 so far. Bridgestone says it didn’t direct testers on what to look for other than to say, here’s the ball, go hit it.

“Pretty much everyone we’ve talked with who tested repeats the REACTIV story back to us without realizing that’s what we designed the ball to do,” says Mellow.

Bridgestone Tour B XS – The Tiger Ball

Bridgestone started prototyping REACTIV Urethane nearly four years ago, with Tiger getting involved in the R&D process in early 2018. The XS is Tiger’s ball and in testing vs. the 2018 XS he picked up — wait for it – 1.6 MPH in driver ball speed and 317 more RPMs on the short pitch. He was going to put the new ball in play at the Hero Challenge and again at the Presidents Cup. Ultimately, he didn’t, but Kuchar and Bryson both gamed the new X in Australia, with Kuchar holing the Cup-winning putt with it.

Bridgestone Tour B XS

And if you follow social media at all, you know Brendan Steele gamed the XS at the Sony in Hawaii – and damn near won. Three or four other non-contract players also gamed the ball at the Sony. Lexi Thompson scored a Top-1o in her first tournament with the new ball, and Tiger will be putting it in play at Torrey this weekend.

This past weekend, the new RXS ball got some love on the Champions Tour with Fred Couples and Rocco Mediate teeing up yellow versions, with Couples losing in a playoff. And not for nothing, baseball Hall-of-Famer John Smoltz won the Diamond Resorts Tournament of Champions Celebrity Division last weekend with the RXS.

“Full disclosure – we tried to get Rocco and Freddie into the RX/RXS balls previously,” says Mellow. “But there were issues where maybe the RX was long but didn’t stop or the RXS would stop but it wasn’t long enough. But the new RXS gives them the distance but, at the same time, they’ll be able to stop it on the green.”

Bridgestone Tour B RXS

And, in case you’re wondering, Bridgestone insists the ball you, me and Wally from down the street can buy at Dick’s, The Golfer’s Warehouse or the PGA TOUR SuperStore is the exact same ball Tiger, Freddie, Rocco, Kooch and Bryson play. There are no secret options on Bridgestone’s menu.

The Market Share Tango

Not all that long ago, Bridgestone was sitting in the #2 position in golf ball market share. Since then, Callaway has zipped past them like a cruise missile with TaylorMade also nosing ahead over the past year-and-a-half. As of right now, Bridgestone, TaylorMade and Srixon are duking it out for the 3-4-5 market-share positions.

Bridgestone CEO Dan Murphy firmly believes REACTIV and the new Tour Bs are a huge step in reclaiming lost business.

“It all starts with product, obviously, but communicating that product is also something we’ll be doing,” says Murphy. “We have new ads, new packaging, new tour activity – particularly with Freddie and the RX. Our intent is to get back to Number Two.”

Bridgestone Tour B

Looking at it tactically, the firmer Tour B X and XS set up head-to-head against Pro V1/1X, TP5/5X and Z-STAR/Z-STAR XV. The softer RX/RXS match up against the Chrome Soft/Chrome Soft X. Is there a worry that four tour-level balls – your main competitors only have two – might confuse the market?

“Actually, if I were the other guys, I’d be worried that I only had two,” says Mellow. “Yes, there are four, but the reality is for each consumer there’s really only two.”

At that point, it’s a fitting story. If your swing speed is over 105, you look at the X or the XS. If you’re under 105, you look at the RX and RXS. “The four models quickly become two,” says Mellow. “Then it’s a choice between more distance or more spin, just like the others.”

As Murphy says, communicating the REACTIV story is critical going forward. Pending our own verification, it’s a cool story, but from a marketing standpoint, it might be a tricky story to tell simply so golfers will understand it and act on it. You’ll see REACTIV-focused ads and more social media from Bridgestone this year and a few more wins plus another major for Tiger won’t hurt. But as Bridgestone tries to tell the tale of REACTIV, four tour balls, and its fitting story, it may find it has its own Tiger problem: Tiger fans who want Tiger’s ball, even if it’s wrong for them.

Bridgestone Tour B

“Historically, our consumer has been the technical guy who understands fitting and wants the best ball for his game,” says Mellow. “But, yes, the core Tiger fan is buying Tiger’s ball because Tiger plays it.”

Bridgestone is hoping its newly reinvented fitting program (which includes an innovative slow-mo smartphone video-fitting option) – along with the newly revamped RX and RXS – can redirect the Tiger player into the right ball for them.

Bridgestone Tour B Price, Availability and Final Thoughts

The new Bridgestone REACTIV Urethane Tour B X and XS balls will be available in Classic White (an Optic Yellow XS will be sold in Japan – demand will determine if it’s sold in North America), and the Tour B RX and RXS will be available in both white and yellow.

All four will retail for $44.99/dozen (the same as last year) and we don’t know if it’s an omen or not, but they’ll hit retail this Valentine’s Day, February 14.

When you think about how Bridgestone lost its #2 (and its #3) position in golf balls, you’ll find lots of reasons, but lousy balls isn’t one of them. Bridgestone lost substantial market share to both Callaway and TaylorMade despite consistently producing high-performing, top-quality product.

Bridgestone Tour B X

Ineffective messaging (a.k.a. marketing), the sharp curtailing of ball fitting (since reintroduced), leadership concerns and other issues all conspired against Bridgestone, but it’s no coincidence that selling a lot of golf clubs and selling a lot of golf balls go hand in hand. I know correlation isn’t causation, but of the top five in golf ball market share, only Bridgestone has no real presence in the club market.

Think about that for a minute. Callaway sells a metric crap-ton of golf clubs, so golfers gobble up their balls. If you’re Bridgestone, you see a ball you know isn’t as good as yours zoom past you and take your market share. It’s gotta be like watching the class doofus steal your girlfriend.

That, my friends, is the power of branding.

And that, my friends, is what Bridgestone is up against.

For more information, visit BridgestoneGolf.com.

For You

For You

News
Apr 22, 2024
Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
Golf Balls
Apr 22, 2024
Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
Golf Technology
Apr 21, 2024
Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John is an aging, yet avid golfer, writer, 6-point-something handicapper living back home in New England after a 22-year exile in Minnesota. He loves telling stories, writing about golf and golf travel, and enjoys classic golf equipment. “The only thing a golfer needs is more daylight.” - BenHogan

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

Ask MyGolfSpy: Wilson Golf
Apr 19, 2024 | 31 Comments
We Tried It: Penfold Sunday Stand Bag
Apr 18, 2024 | 5 Comments
Shot Scope V5 Golf Watch
Apr 3, 2024 | 14 Comments
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Russ

      4 years ago

      I game the BX, switched from Prov1. I have bounced back and forth between the Prov1 and Prov1x and tried the TP5. Loved the feel of TP5 off irons and around the green but my ego struggled with loss of distance The BX feels feels silky around the green, though I have had to adjust grip pressure to manage the increased bite. I get optimal spin off driver 1800-2100 that pairs well with low spin Ventus shaft and Low spin head. For me to BX is 10 yds longer than the Prov1x with all the feel benefits of the Prov1. Oddly, the RX, targetted for my 93-95 swing speed, did not provide the same carry and ball flight.

      I had avoided the B series because of too many choices. Friends touted the benefits of the ball but when I got the the golf store I could not remember the numbers and letters of the ball they recommended so I ended up buying the tried and true Titleist ball. I think the Bridgestone guy is dead wrong, 105 should not be the first of two dichotomies to choose a ball.

      At the point of purchase, it’s not all about numbers, it’s about feel, loving the new Reactive cover, how we want to ball to launch and spin, and removingd variations that all sound the same. I am glad Bridgestone simplified the choices. I am glad the ball is made in the US, and I love how well the BX matches my game.

      Reply

      Jake

      4 years ago

      I’m late to the party on this one. But I have been doing a lot of digging and have been wanting to only play with one ball this season. This article is what sold me on Bridgestone and I just pulled the trigger.

      All the claims from year to year sound the same and its almost like crying wolf. You almost become numb and roll your eyes when the new model comes out and they claim, “spins more around the green, spins less off the driver, and feels soft!”

      Your correlation with Bridgestone being a tire company is actually what made me pull the trigger. They’re a tire company! What do they do and what have they always been based around? TIRES, tires made of rubber and urethane being a rubber. The correlation is almost too obvious it made me think, “Why didn’t I think of that?” Mygolfspy has put a lot of attention towards how important it is to buy a ball that has input in their ball. I honestly feel Bridgestone is that company to put all their energy in a ball.

      So far I’ve been playing with the Tour B XS and love how it fits my game and fits the course I play.

      Thanks for the article and it was the best I’ve been able to find so far about the 2020 line.

      Reply

      10shot

      4 years ago

      I received a 2 ball sleeve yesterday from Bridgestone off of a Twitter deal they had going, hit them today indoors with monitor. Played, ProV1, Titleist Tour soft, Costco 3 piece and, the BS RXS.
      It has a soft feel with the ProV1 whack. The soft feel was not the low compression feel, it just had this feel off the club face that felt damn good. Lower spin on the monitor compare to both Titleist balls. I did like the feel off the club, Today I was using Titleist 718 T-MB ,7, 4 and 2 irons. Hit a TaylorMade M4 tour 5 metal 18* I just put together, Hit it pretty well, 224, 219 and 221. I will say I love the feel off the club but, as many balls cost. I personally feel distance is not relevant because it’s always 3-6 yards plus or minus, 20+ would be worth noting. For me it is spin, flight and feel it did all very well. Will get to put them on the grass in 2 weeks for the real test. Gonna need to buy at least 1 dozen for that trip.
      I play a lot like many and, I do lose balls. $44.00 per dozen is more than I will pay. I raised my $23.00 per dozen last year to $30.00 per dozen. Think that will be my limit. Guess I’ll wait until I see over runs for xx per dozen with “I love Bob” in them?⛳???

      Reply

      Wilson D Kelly

      4 years ago

      Used to play the B330S & loved it but felt their beer balls didnt cut it. When they made a change a couple years ago(?) did my own driver test on a par 5 with Vice, TP5 & XS.
      XS was longer by bout 5 yes, then the Vice., with the TP5 a close 3rd. When I find an old Bridgestone. I play it. Looking forward to the new XS.

      Reply

      Robert Randow

      4 years ago

      Currently playing the B XS. Can vouch for the extra distance and really loved the ball in windy conditions. Very stable. Can’t wait to try the RXS since I’m under the 105mph mark.

      Reply

      Chad

      4 years ago

      2020 MyGolfSpy golf ball test, please..

      Reply

      Matt

      4 years ago

      The article correctly identifies one of the main issues for Bridgestone’s loss of market share, which is that they do a HORRIBLE job marketing their balls, which are as good, if not better, than anything else out there.

      Their website is poor and lacks sufficiently detailed information about the respective ball models, or how to pick one. The packaging of the balls is questionable (though an improvement on last year’s models) and their messaging is weak. IMO they need to be WAY more aggressive on the marketing and branding front, especially as balls are their main product. They also appear to have the resources to be able to do so. It’s frankly baffling why they don’t pay more attention to this. Even an amazing product will only take you so far…

      Reply

      Dave

      4 years ago

      This was a great read. I loved the deep dive into the world of golfballs, Bridgestone as a company and their new 2020 golf balls.

      Reply

      Joe Golfer

      4 years ago

      I really liked this article. It explained things really well. Nice job by the author.
      I understand Bridgestone’s help in choosing a ball, with the over or under 105 mph as a gauge to assist in choosing. That said, I recall when MGS did the test of all brands of golf balls, and MGS seemed to say that a softer ball never goes as far as the firmer ball, thus recommending that we go with the firmer ball for distance. I wonder if that is the case here. Does the RX or RXS go shorter than the X or XS, even if I swing only 90 mph? I’m probably older than most of you, so even today’s firmer golf balls feel softer than the old rocks I used to hit 35 years ago. For example, a Titleist Pro V1 feels relatively soft to me compared to the junk I used to hit when a younger man.

      Reply

      John Barba

      4 years ago

      The X and XS are of higher compression than the RX and RXS so in theory, with a higher swing speed you should be more distance with the X and XS. As always, your mileage may vary.

      Reply

      Andrew

      4 years ago

      The theory is that at less than 105MPH, the amount of ball speed you lose with the driver will be minimal. And the lower compression with the RX and RXS will lead to lower iron spin, which will make your irons go further. The net effect will be that on average you gain more distance throughout your bag.

      However, if you are already struggling with not enough spin, lowering spin on the irons will probably be more detrimental than the slight increase in distance will be helpful.

      Reply

      Rod

      4 years ago

      Any idea what the spin rate is of the Tour B X and XS? I’d like to demo these next month when they come out, just curious if the X spins a ton less or just a little less. Thanks!

      Reply

      John Giblin

      4 years ago

      Based on the MyGolf Spy 2019 study and this new ball coming out and now after this weekend (trying out the BX ball), i will be trying the BX 1st and probably last. I love the way the BX reacts off the driver face,: irons and great spin on the wedges. And i neglected to mention on how great the BX feels on the putter face. I cannot wait till my honey buys me my first dozen of the reactive urethane brudgestone BX balls on Valentines day!!!! I know it will be love at 1st site. ::)

      Reply

      John Barba

      4 years ago

      Played all four balls last week – I’m not a really high spin wedge player, but the difference in balls is noticeable. Not sure if that translates into a ton or a little, but it was noticeable.

      Reply

      Rod

      4 years ago

      Thanks John. I currently play the ProV1x and at times hit the TP5x, I like a lower spinning ball off the driver face – turns a slice into a fade :) I like some spin off the chip shots and like the softer feel / sound off the putter. I’m thinking the X will work out best for me, but looking forward to testing both the X and the XS.

      Mike

      4 years ago

      Doesn’t the USGA have a standard for initial velocity? How can any ball near the limit become significantly faster and still conform?

      Reply

      Joey5Picks

      4 years ago

      All balls, irons and drivers get longer each year, despite the USGA limits. Somehow this equipment is able to be deemed legal, but give us 5 more yards….every year!

      Reply

      Andrew

      4 years ago

      I don’t believe any of the tour balls are at the limit. Part of the issue is that by putting a soft urethane cover on, you automatically are going to pull the ball back from the limits of what it could do.

      John

      4 years ago

      Does this mean that the E12 softballs are now redundant

      Reply

      Nicholas

      4 years ago

      I genuinely find the beginning of this article confusing. You state that the softer ball is spinnier? When did this paradigm shift occur? The softer Pro V1 spins less than its Pro V1x counterpart.

      Reply

      Jake

      4 years ago

      Isn’t it confusing!? lol I find myself asking the same question with all the “x” and plus balls. The biggest correlation with the X is that its firmer and for a higher clubhead speed. Slower swing speed shots like pitch and chips might spin more with softer balls but not by that much. Higher swing speeds, a firmer ball will go “farther” but not always spin more. For example, TP5 spins more than TP5x but TP5x goes straighter, farther, and higher. Prov1 spins less than Prov1x. but the X will go farther (i believe).

      I wish the X was consistent across the board with all companies but unfortunately we have to do some additional digging and figure out what they’re trying to accomplish.

      Reply

      Kim I-P

      4 years ago

      looking forward to a followup of last years golf ball head to head test

      Reply

      mackdaddy9

      4 years ago

      Wow now I have to add the B rx to my test in the spring. I played them for a few years until I switched to the Chrome Soft.

      Reply

      Sam

      4 years ago

      When I read this article all I could think of are the videos of people playing with oobleck. When they are softly touching the goo it is very soft and liquid like but when its impacted it turns to a solid. Really cool chemistry stuff going on there.

      Reply

      Kevin

      4 years ago

      A new material that provides more control around the greens AND more distance off the tee does sound like a “game changer”, but at $45/dozen it needs to be better than the ProV1 or it likely won’t elevate their sales. I liked Bridgestone when the introduced the original B330RXS as the ball felt good, performed well and cost less. Price no object I would have taken the ProV, but the RXS was a great compromise I thought. Then they got popular and they raised the price, good for them, but now I’m back looking for that “compromise” ball that performs well enough for my game, but doesn’t cost as much or can be found on sale. So next I’m buying Chromes or Project A’s or whatever. Currently I look for sales (got BX balls for $25/box) and I like Snells at $26-$28/dozen. I’m probably not the truly typical customer, but I’m not sure Bridgestone will gain a lot more market share with $45/box ball that MAY be a little better. If this material is so great, couldn’t you just have made one or two truly great balls for the masses and gotten it down to $30-$35/box?

      Reply

      Funkaholic

      4 years ago

      They might be competition for Srixon, hard to take market share away from Titleist, they make a great ball but, they also have a zombie cult. A large part of their customer base would never test another ball or if they did, they would already have made their mind up about which was better. I find good deals on last seasons balls from Srixon and Bridgestone all of the time, for now I prefer the Srixon Zstar XV but, I like Bridgestone and will definitely give this ball a fair shake.

      Reply

      Mizzed Green

      4 years ago

      Srixon/Dunlop and Bridgestone are kind of similar companies in that they are part of huge Japanese tire companies with a ton of research and resources.. I tend to trust them and love the BX and XV and for whatever reason, don’t’ want to be part of the Pro V1 brigade. I just like having a different ball.

      Jay

      4 years ago

      The Tour B balls are on sale right now for $36/dozen. Stock up.

      Reply

      Matt B

      4 years ago

      As others have mentioned the key is to stock up when the older models are discounted to make way for the newer replacement. That way you don’t have to compromise or pay full price.

      Reply

      Bill

      4 years ago

      But the fact that all four balls have the exact same performance increase tested under all skill levels speaks about how unique the REACTIV material is.”So I just read this and confused. If all four have same performance, why do they need four? If x and XS are the same? Guess I’m not getting it!!! Lol

      Reply

      Funkaholic

      4 years ago

      Same performance increase is not “same performance”, they are all different performance profiles and each profile increased the same amount. If I am driving a Honda Civic and you are driving a Ferrari and we each get a boost of 20 horse power, my Honda does not become equal to your Ferrari.

      Reply

      Joe Golfer

      4 years ago

      Excellent analogy.

      Don

      4 years ago

      Ha. At first I didn’t notice the period and thought they were saying it added 15 mph ball speed at which point I was ready to storm the USGA and demand how they could possibly have approved these as conforming.
      A mile and a half ball speed is probably doable and still conforming. For those who don’t know, that’s worth about 4-5 yards on every club if true.

      Reply

      Blake Smittkamp

      4 years ago

      Dude me too.!

      Reply

      Joey5Picks

      4 years ago

      1..5 mph of ballspeed off the driver = 3-4 yards of carry. It differs for other clubs

      Reply

      David B

      4 years ago

      This and the Cleveland wedge piece were most enjoyable and interesting to read. Wish you’d do more writing for MGS. Fine job, John.

      Reply

      Des McSweeney

      4 years ago

      I 100% agree with David B’s opinion. Two very good reads. More any time you feel like it ;-). Des

      Reply

      John Barba

      4 years ago

      Awww, shucks. Thank you for reading, gents!

      John

      4 years ago

      Was a huge fan of the old EV Extra Spin, played Bridgestone on and off since then. Looking forward to trying these!

      Reply

      Lewis

      4 years ago

      Currently happy with the Snell MTB-X at $28 so before I spring for a more expensive ball would really like to see some kind of direct comparison. Pretty sure your testing proved the Snell was the longest ball around so need evidence that the BX is up there with it.

      Reply

      Jon Silverberg

      4 years ago

      My Golf Spy’s 2019 ball testing caused you to state categorically that a harder ball goes further, for any and all swing speeds. 1) Does Bridgestone agree with that for their 2019 balls? 2) Does Bridgestone agree with that for their 2020 balls? 3) When will you test that rule of thumb for 2020 Bridgestone balls?

      Reply

      John Barba

      4 years ago

      Short answers – yes and yes and soon.

      Understand this isn’t a core/compression thing. – it’s a completely new cover material – a chemical compound that’s based on urethane but with additives that gives it a completely different makeup and set of performance characteristics. It reacts like – keyword being like – a softer ball when hit with a wedge at a slower swing speed, and like a harder ball when hit with a driver at a higher swing speed.

      Hope this helps..

      Reply

      Andrew Han

      4 years ago

      When I read this, I immediately thought of Oobleck.. Is that correct and analogous.?

      Christopher

      4 years ago

      Didn’t Bernhard Langer game a yellow Ultra in the 1980s? that thing was pretty solid!

      Reply

      Tim

      4 years ago

      I really want to see the amateur testing on these balls over other leading balls……lets get this started ASAP!!!!!

      Reply

      Mark Jon Gottschalk

      4 years ago

      There is a good size group non-pros of various levels testing these at MGS as I type (I am one of them). Enjoy what we have to say So far I am in LOVE with the RX

      Reply

      jlukes

      4 years ago

      Great stuff. I am torn between the X and XS ( The Bridgestone Ball fitting literally has me playing either one depending on a small change in sidespin numbers I input)

      Did Bridgestone provide any information as to why one would prefer the X vs the XS or vice-versa? Does the XS launch lower? higher? Spin more off mid irons?

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      4 years ago

      You can expect even greater differentiation this time around. XS is going to spin more throughout the bag.

      Reply

      Mizzed Green

      4 years ago

      I’ve had great results with the BX recently, but now it’s January and if I get out, it’s the Z Star. Might have to give the new B XS a try. Does anyone know if Srixon are coming with something in the Z line, or will that be in 12 months because of their cycle?

      Reply

      Terry

      4 years ago

      Wow. With my new Super Speed training system and these new balls I should add about 35-40 yards off the tee

      Reply

      John

      4 years ago

      Isn’t the same principle than the Wilson smart core balls when they came out 20 years ago? ( They were developed with the help of Goodyear)

      Reply

      Dennis Whitehead

      4 years ago

      Thanks, John. Interesting article. I’m a long time fan of Bridgestone balls (and tires)

      Reply

      Dean

      4 years ago

      Great write up! You have me now wanting to go out and buy 27 dozen Bridgestone golf balls. I have always like Bridgestone and Snell with a soft spot for Snell.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 22, 2024
    Strength Training for Golfers: Building a Strong and Stable Core
    Golf Balls
    Apr 22, 2024
    Callaway Supersoft Mother’s Day Bouquet
    Golf Technology
    Apr 21, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.