2020 Most Wanted Game Improvement Iron
Irons

2020 Most Wanted Game Improvement Iron

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

2020 Most Wanted Game Improvement Iron
Titleist T300
Mizuno JPX 921 Hot Metal
Srixon Z585
XXIO X Series
Tour Edge Exotics ESX 220
Most Wanted Game Improvement Iron
Titleist T300
  • 2020 Most Wanted Game Improvement Iron
  • Highest Strokes Gained for mid irons
  • Among the leaders in Strokes Gained for short irons
  • Players who struggle with long irons should consider hybrids
  • T-1st
  • 7th
  • 166.52 Yards
Most Wanted Game Improvement Iron
Mizuno JPX 921 Hot Metal
  • 2020 Most Wanted Game Improvement Iron
  • Among the leaders in long iron Strokes Gained
  • Among the leaders in short iron Strokes Gained
  • Below-average distance
  • T-1st
  • 6th
  • 163.58 Yards
Srixon Z585
  • Best Strokes Gained for short iron
  • Among the leaders in Strokes Gained for long iron
  • One of the most forgiving irons tested

  • Towards the bottom for distance
  • 3rd
  • 3rd
  • 162.97 Yards
XXIO X Series
  • Leader in Strokes Gained for long iron
  • Among the leaders in distance
  • Towards the bottom in Strokes Gained for short irons
  • 4th
  • 14th
  • 167.25 Yards
Best Value
Tour Edge Exotics ESX 220
  • Among the leaders in distance
  • One of the top-rated clubs for forgiveness
  • One of the lowest-launching clubs across the board
  • 5th
  • 5th
  • 167.52 Yards

INDEPENDENT & UNBIASED

MyGolfSpy accepts $0 advertising dollars from any of the major golf manufacturers. We believe in always putting #ConsumerFirst.

240

Hours
Researched

18

Products
Considered

17,280

Shots
Hit

53.5

Readers

Our Job is Your Game

Game improvement irons are a constant in the golf industry, promising ego-boosting distance mixed with forgiveness across the face. While blades are sexy, game improvement irons are the foundation of nearly every manufacturer’s lineup. Good, bad or ugly, they offer something for almost everyone.

We are here to help you navigate the “Wild, Wild, West” that is the game improvement market. The category is loaded with distance, forgiveness and, believe it or not, looks. This stagecoach has 18 different models on board so hop on, strap in and get ready for this wild ride.

If you are in the market for game improvement irons, the 2020 Most Wanted Game Improvement Iron test is for you.

Most Wanted: Titleist T300 and Mizuno JPX 921 Hot Metal

Performance Grades

Below is the Best Player’s Distance Iron 2020 broken down by performance grades for each iron length. The percentages displayed for each iron represent the frequency at which each was among the best performing irons for each tester across the test pool. For more information about how we arrive at these results, see our How We Test page.

Expert Consultant - Lou Stagner

Lou serves as the Director, Analytics at a multi-billion dollar privately held company. He has over 20 years of experience in analytics, data architecture, and machine learning across a variety of industries, including finance, manufacturing, and energy. Lou recently partnered with Scott Fawcett, creator of the DECADE system, where together, they use stats & analytics to help improve the games of professional and amateur golfers.

Follow @LouStagner on Twitter | PlayingLesson.com

Iron-Buying Considerations for Game Improvement Irons

Performance should be your primary concern when buying new irons but there are additional considerations to think about before you make your purchase.

SET MAKE-UP

Picture two scenarios: a shot into a long par-3 or a short to medium approach shot to a tucked pin that requires a soft landing. The proper set make-up can boost your confidence and performance with each of those scenarios and additional ones, too. Game improvement irons provide greater consistency across the face for better distance, more control and higher launch, which can lead to boosted confidence.

SHAFT SELECTION

The number of shaft options for irons is growing. It can be challenging to navigate the different models, weights and flexes to find the shaft that is right for you. The answer to the best-performing shaft question stretches well beyond graphite versus steel.

We recommend a professional fitting. If you don’t have the resources, ask your local golf shop if they have a Mizuno Shaft Optimizer. This advanced technology utilizes gyroscopes and strain gauges to measure club speed, tempo and how much the shaft is flexing at impact. It will then recommend a list of shafts based on the data collected. Additionally, it records lie angle. All in all, a multi-purpose fitting device.

Shafts in the game improvement category tend to be lighter so while we always recommend a proper fitting for everyone in the market for new irons, choosing the right shaft is especially important for faster, more aggressive swingers.

DISTANCE VERSUS FORGIVENESS

If you think “distance versus forgiveness” is an easier topic to maneuver in this category than the 2020 Most Wanted Players Distance Iron, think again. We all know game improvement irons equal eye-catching distance. More so, these irons are known for their forgiveness. Finding and discovering the proper balance between the two qualities is a daunting task. However, this test reveals leaders for both qualities. If you are looking for pure distance, Callaway Mavrik, Wilson Staff D7 and TaylorMade Sim Max OS are the leaders. If you are searching for forgiveness, the kings of the category are the Honma T//World XP-1 and the PING G410.

COST

Over the years, iron prices have steadily risen. However, the 2020 Most Wanted Game Improvement Iron test reveals some hope. The majority of the irons run between $800 and $1,000. The PXG 0311 XP GEN3 carries a hefty price tag: $299 per club. But the PXG 0211 is only $89 a club. If you’re looking to spend even less, the Tommy Armour 845 can be had for $449.99 for a seven-piece set.

Best Distance - Callaway Mavrik

Best Distance - Callaway Mavrik

Built utilizing AI Technology, the Callaway Mavrik led the field in distance. While our metrics focus on long and mid-iron distance, Mavrik's short irons were also longer than most. If more distance is at the top of your wish list, your search should begin with the Callaway Mavrik.

Field Notes – Game Improvement Irons

During each test, we look for  insight into where the market as a whole is moving. Furthermore, we analyze noteworthy changes manufacturers have made to improve year-over-year performance. Throughout testing, we solicit feedback from our testing pool. Although the testers’ subjective feedback is enlightening, it has zero impact on the overall rankings.

TRENDS AND TWEAKS

  • In all honesty, you want the power, you want the speed and you want the distance. The manufacturers brought the heat with thinner faces to increase ball speed.  Mizuno JPX 921 Hot Metal, PXG 0311 XP Gen3, PXG 0211 and TaylorMade Sim Max OS, each feature technology that allows for a thinner face for more distance. Mizuno has Chromoly. PXG has an impressive DuelCOR system to support its HT1770 steel face. Finally, TaylorMade’s SIM leverages Progressive Inverted Cone Technology to produce a an eight-percent thinner face than its TaylorMade M6. By some measure or another, nearly everyone is promising benefits from their take on thin faces.
  • Technology is constantly changing. Over the past couple of years, Callaway has pushed the envelope with AI-powered designs. The Callaway Mavrik irons are a prime example. Utilizing artificial intelligence, Callaway creates their Flash Face Cup Technology which boasts unique performance from each individual iron.
  • Once again, we are seeing manufacturers set a trend with hollow-body design in their game improvement irons. Manufacturers such as Tour Edge Exotics EXS 220, Honma T//World XP-1 and Cleveland Launcher UHX, all implement hollow-body design aspects, especially in their longer irons. On the other hand, Cobra KING Speedzone and PING G410 leverage cavity badges to enhance feel and sound.
  • Once upon a time, game improvement irons had respectable lofts. Nowadays, that is questionable, to say the least. Strengthened or jacked lofts continue to be a theme in the category. We measured the lofts in house and, for example, found pitching wedges with lofts as low as 41 degrees. Strong lofts can be great for distance but when pushed too far, performance can be put at risk.
Best Forgiveness - Honma T//World XP-1

Best Forgiveness - Honma T//World XP-1

There is always an under the radar performer. In this year's test, Honma T//World XP-1 was a bit of surprise as the most forgiving iron in the test. If you are looking to narrow the gap between your best shots and your worst, the Honma T//World XP-1 should be on your list.

NOTES FROM THE TESTING POOL

We compiled the subjective feedback from our pool of 20 testers. While their insights are often thought-provoking, they don’t factor into our overall rankings.

  • A tester favorite by far, the Srixon Z585 was lauded for its outstanding feel and eye-catching design. The Honma T//World XP-1 was popular with the testers for similar reasons.
  • Testers were extremely pleased when long irons were easy to hit. Noticeable headliners were the Cleveland Launcher UHX, Cobra KING Speedzone, Cobra KING Speedzone ONE,and Wilson Staff D7. With its shorter length, Cobra’s ONE Length 5-iron had tremendous appeal to testers. 
  • Throughout the test, golfers were pleasantly surprised by the XXIO X Series. Multiple testers said it was the best XXIO iron they ever hit. According to one,  “This iron will be a dark horse in this year’s test. This is an incredibly appealing club.” 
  • When a phrase keeps getting repeated, you know there is substance. The Titleist T300 and the Mizuno JPX 921 Hot Metal were the two clubs first mentioned by a majority of testers in terms of checking all the boxes. Their feel, looks and performance were cited as positives.
  • Often, clubs receive mixed reviews. This year, it was the Epon AF-505. Some testers said they were some of the best-feeling, best-looking clubs in the test but there were others who disliked the feel and design, ranking them near the bottom.
  • In the golf world, direct-to-consumer products are the underdogs. New Level MODB-1 was not the club rolling off testers’ lips but it had its share of positive feedback, specifically for excellent feel. The shape of the toe was often cited as a negative.

2020 Most Wanted Game Improvement Irons Data

EXPERT TIP - SHAFT MATERIAL

Although steel shafts dominate the testing pool, graphite shafts are becoming more suitable for higher swing speed players. The perception is steel shafts are for stronger, faster swinging players. Whereas, graphite shafts are not. Be open minded towards the shaft material in your next set of irons. The appropriate shaft material can lead to tighter dispersion and tighter launch conditions, and graphite shafts might just be the ticket to those attributes.

More Tips

  • Distance sells but make sure you’re not trading high shots that land soft and hold greens for a few extra yards you may not need.
  • It’s not unusual to struggle with long irons. Instead of suffering unnecessarily, consider replacing your difficult-to-hit long irons with hybrids.
  • If you struggle to hit your scoring clubs high enough, consider switching to ONE Length. The longer short irons often produce higher trajectories and more stopping power.

HOW WE TEST

Our mission is to help you find the best Game Improvement Iron for your game.

We are 100% independent and unbiased, and always put the #ConsumerFirst

ABOUT OUR TESTERS

Our pool of testers consists of 20 golfers with handicaps ranging from plus to the mid-teens. As a group, they span a broad range of swing characteristics.

Over the course of several sessions, each golfer is required to hit PW, 7 Iron, and 5 Iron. Iron groupings and order are randomized on a per tester basis.

LIMITING VARIABLES AND GATHERING RELIABLE DATA

To minimize variables, all testers hit Bridgestone Tour B-X Golf Balls inside our dedicated Lab X testing facility located in Yorktown, Va.

While it doesn't affect the final results, subjective feedback on looks, feel and alignment is taken from each tester on every putter in the test.

CRUNCHING THE NUMBERS

To determine the Most Wanted Game Improvement Iron, we calculate the strokes gained value for each iron relative to the average strokes for each tester. Those values are aggregated and totaled with the Most Wanted iron being the one that produced the highest average strokes gained value across the test pool.

Product Specifications

2020 MW GI Product Specs

ProductPW LoftPW Length7 Iron Loft7 Iron Length5 Iron Loft5 Iron Length
Callaway Mavrik

Check Price
4135.526.7536.62521.538
Cleveland Launcher UHX

Check Price
44.2535.753037.12523.2538.375
Cobra KING Speedzone

Check Price
42.535.7527.7537.2523.7538.375
Cobra KING Speedzone ONE

Check Price
43.7537273723.2537
Epon AF-505

Check Price
44.7535.62531.536.87524.538
Honma T//World XP-1

Check Price
4335.37529.53723.2538
Mizuno JPX 921 Hot Metal

Check Price
43.7535.528.53721.7538.125
New Level MODB-1

Check Price
43.535.37529.7536.7522.7537.875
PING G410

Check Price
44.2535.5303723.538.25
PXG 0211

Check Price
45.2535.62530.253724.538.125
PXG 0311 XP Gen3

Check Price
42.535.87527.537.2521.2538.5
Srixon Z585

Check Price
4335.37530.536.87523.537.875
TaylorMade Sim Max OS

Check Price
4235.2526.5372238.125
Titleist T300

Check Price
42.7535.62528.753722.7537.875
Tommy Armour 845

Check Price
41.253528.536.7521.2537.75
Tour Edge Exotics EXS 220

Check Price
43.7535.52837.12522.2538
Wilson Staff D7

Check Price
4235.62527.7537.12521.7538.125
XXIO X Series

Check Price
41.7535.25283723.2537.875

FAQ

Q: How often should I buy new irons?

A: While on rare occasions there are quantifiable year-over-year breakthroughs, typically it takes three to five years for manufacturers to make significant performance gains. With the USGA further tightening restrictions on manufacturers, it’s possible, even likely, that it will take longer still moving forward. Our recommendation is to buy new irons only when they appreciably outperform what is already in your bag. Of course, if you want new irons because you want new irons, be our guest.

Q: How do I determine the right category of irons for me?

A: The four main categories of irons – player’s, player’s distance, game improvement  and super game improvement –  can easily be differentiated by your skill level as well as what you need in your game. First, be realistic about your skill level. If your handicap is above 10 and ball-striking is not a legitimate strength, consider game improvement or super game improvement. For more skilled players who hit the ball more consistently, a set of player’s irons or player’s distance irons may benefit your game the most.

Q: Does the shaft matter?

A: Absolutely. While changes to launch and spin differences are rarely massive, shaft changes frequently lead to improved accuracy, tighter dispersion, and greater overall consistency.

Q: What should I look for when testing irons?

A: While golfers have been conditioned to consider distance to the exclusion of nearly everything else, we recommend looking at the little numbers and looking for small circles. When comparing metrics like distance and ball speed, be sure to look at your standard deviations (the small numbers usually found under the big ones on the data screen). Smaller numbers mean better consistency which will usually mean more than an extra yard or two on the golf course. Similarly, look for tighter dispersion ellipses (small circles). We can’t overstate the importance of consistency with irons.

MOST WANTED

Q: How are the irons in the test fitted to each golfer?

A: We use a fitting process that we call fit from stock. Irons are fitted to each tester using the stock, no up-charge options from each manufacturer. We test one short iron, one mid-iron and one long iron from each set. While there are no irons in our testing that feature adjustability, we fit to flex for each tester in the pool. Occasionally, manufacturers will send multiple sets with different stock shafts that we can utilize to improve launch conditions.

Q: How do you determine in which category to test a given set of irons?

A: To ensure that we’re testing irons as alike as designers allow for, in addition to the design of the head itself (profile, sole width, etc.), we sort by length and loft. Our goal is to keep differences as minimal as possible within any test cohort. When an iron reasonably fits in more than one category, we defer to the manufacturer’s category choice.

Q: How is the Most Wanted- Best Game Improvement Iron 2020 determined?

A: To determine our rankings, we collect key performance metrics with Foresight GCQuad Launch Monitors. After eliminating outliers, we use a utilize a proprietary methodology to calculate Strokes Gained values for each combination of tester and golf club. The iron that produces the highest Strokes Gained values relative to the field average is our Most Wanted.

Q: How is the “longest” iron determined?

A: The process to determine the longest game improvement iron is similar to how we arrive at our overall rankings. For distance, our critical metric is Total Yards. We identify the iron that produced the most total yards with the long and middle irons relative to the field average.

Q: How is the “most forgiving” iron determined?

A: We’ve taken a practical approach to forgiveness. The club for which Strokes Gained values for the best shots are closest to the Strokes Gained value for the worst shots (relative to the field average) is the Most Forgiving.

Q: You discuss subjective feedback for things like looks, sound and feel. How much do those ratings factor into your rankings?

A: ZERO. Our rankings are based purely on launch monitor data and quantifiable performance metrics.

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS


Amount

Frequency

For You

For You

Golf Wedges
May 16, 2024
Wedge Fitting and the Web: PING’s Stake in the Ground
Golf Shoes
May 16, 2024
Pour One Out for NIKE’s Air Zoom Infinity Tour NRG
Golf Technology
May 16, 2024
18 Luxury Golf Gifts We’re Drooling Over
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Our mission is #ConsumerFirst. We are here to help educate and empower golfers. We want you to get the most out of your money, time and performance. That means providing you with equipment reviews you can trust, as well as honest reporting on the latest issues affecting the game today. #PowerToThePlayer

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Driver Ping G30 Hybrids PXG 0317
3/4 IRON PXG 0311XF 5-GW Srixon Z 565
SW PXG 0317 LW PXG 0311
Putter EVNROLL  
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      PJ Murrieta

      3 years ago

      What numbers of the irons are considered long/mid/short irons?

      Reply

      MSG

      3 years ago

      I just picked up the Srixon Z585. These irons are so good. Very forgiving but far from being chunky GI irons. The feel also is great, being forged irons.

      Reply

      Jesse H

      3 years ago

      Does anybody know what the definition of long/mid/short irons are in these tests? Thinking if “long” means something I’m likely to replace with a hybrid anyway that their performance isn’t that relevant to me.

      Reply

      Forty something

      3 years ago

      Obviously, there is a strong correlation between loft and distance. The “winner” as the longest 7 iron has a sub-27 degree loft. We are not idiots. I believe that loft on a more “traditional” loft scale is a minimum equivalent to a 6 iron and perhaps even slight stronger than that! This loft jacking is wrong and detrimental for the players. Fitters ask how far do you hit your 7 and do we now have to qualify it with “how old of a 7 iron are we talking about”?!??! MGS glosses over this like it doesn’t matter. You guys know better. Personally I am not buying anything with jacked lofts and will have whatever I settle on bent as weaker as the manufacturer offers (2 degrees usually.)

      Reply

      Joe

      4 years ago

      I see hot metal pro was #1 but, where does the hot metal pro fit?

      Reply

      Kevin D

      4 years ago

      What happened to Shot Area? Makes it difficult to compare irons from different categories over the last couple of years.

      Reply

      Jack

      3 years ago

      I agree…without shot area or distance to center info how are we to know the accuracy of these irons ?

      Reply

      Scooter

      4 years ago

      I’ve learned more from reading these comments than I have from either this article or the manufacturers websites on clubs. I too, am discouraged by the misinformation that I see regarding new irons as if relates to loft. I’m searching for a replacement for my jpx800 pros with a 33 degree 7 iron. Of course I’m gonna hit every i other 7 iron today further cause it’s my 6. The writer talks about the “hot faces” and never once mentions that the distance gains are purely due to stronger lofts. You really do a disservice to the public imo. Perhaps the headline readers are enough to go buy a club based on your graphic but it’s not going to help anyone shoot lower scores.

      Reply

      Scott Smith

      4 years ago

      I’ll echo other folks comments that the distance issue is immaterial with loft jacking. The reviews need to focus on other criteria. or at least adjust for loft..

      Reply

      Bob Kirkwood

      4 years ago

      WAY jacked up lofts!

      Reply

      Marq

      4 years ago

      I wonder which OEM is going to come out with the “longest” putter?

      Reply

      JJ

      4 years ago

      This piece is interesting… until you look at the lofts of the irons. Two of the “longer” clubs (call mav and wilson) are lofted lower at each club than the others.

      The maverick 7 iron is lofted like most other clubs 6 iron and the wilson is about half way between.

      I’m not saying the clubs aren’t solid… and anyone who buys them won’t be happy with how they hit, but they aren’t longer.

      Reply

      Chris

      4 years ago

      There is a case to be made for “distance” irons though… for example, let’s say the players on the test pool are asked to hit to a pin 160 yds away… from the data set here (and data from the most wanted players distance iron category) they could hit any of the following clubs: Mavrik 7 iron, T300 6 iron, JPX 921 HM 6 iron, D7 Forged 6 iron or a PXG 0211 5 iron. From that distance, the Mavrik has the highest launch, steepest descent angle and third highest spin rate (120 revs lower than the D7)… Based on that,iIt should be the one stopping closest to the pin… therefore, when looking at spin and descent angles on the table, one may think that the strong lofted Mavrik does not fare well against the other “mid” or “long” irons and that it would be difficult to control the ball into the green, when in reality, if we look at those 2 categories against carry distance, the Mavrik actually shows numbers that are more “ideal” vs the other clubs

      Reply

      Mike

      4 years ago

      Do you know what the degrees are of loft in these clubs, they’re over a club stronger than anything on the market. You’re pitching wedge is stronger than my nine iron. If that’s great for ego, whatever, but I’ve learned to ignore the number on the club and just go with the law of degrees. So how many wedges are you going to carry now, five, six?

      Reply

      Sebastian

      4 years ago

      I recently switched from my 30+ year old blades to the Srixon 585s. I was impressed with their forgiveness from Toe-to-Heel. I found the launch angle to be shallower for the short irons, which can make it difficult to hold greens. The biggest problem I see with these type of GI irons is if you “pure” a shot the ball will often carry another 10+ yards in distance. This can be very frustrating when you strike efficiently, yet get a wide dispersion. This is an aspect of the GI iron category I believe is narrowly discussed.

      The fellas at TXG do a better job explain in this video here:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfKbkytvpmM

      Reply

      dr. bloor

      4 years ago

      I’ll bet you could put together a pretty nice combo set of XXIO X long/mid irons and Srixon X585 short irons if you’re a mid-capper who wants some extra help to go with short game precision.

      Reply

      Bruce

      4 years ago

      Bob it’s easy to see why this is the longest 7 iron you’ve ever it. You’re hitting a five iron. The loft of your 7-iron is 1° stronger than the loft of a T 100 five iron. My God your wedge has a loft of 38°, that’s the loft of an eight iron. All clubs in the Titleist T series are the same length so that has no bearing on distance.

      Reply

      Gerald Teigrob

      4 years ago

      I played the Cobra Bio Cell irons the last two summers. This year I upgraded to the Cobra F6 and F7 irons and hybrids plus 3/4 fairway wood. Considering the upgrades these clubs have been for me…I am already noticing an improvement in my game with the F7 irons so I wouldn’t upgrade to anything other than the Cobra Speedzone myself. I’m really not big on Srixon irons or Calway. Call me a Cobra guy. I’m sure the game improvement Cobra would put into the Speedzone is more my cup of tea and I don;t expect to lose anything in terms of clubhead speed anytime soon!

      Reply

      Mike

      4 years ago

      How do you like the F7 hybrids? I may need to replace my current ones and I’m not looking to spend a couple hundred bucks on a few new hybrids

      Reply

      Gerald Teigrob

      4 years ago

      Good thinking! Getting the latest irons isn’t always the ideal for players like us who can’t afford to put down $1k or more for an overpriced set of clubs. Having put the F7 irons in my golf bag, I am noticing significant gains. I nailed my 8 iron onto the green from 150 yards out…I ended up with a three putt, but at least I am reaching the green more often than not with these irons. I also have the 3/4 hybrid and 4/5 hybrid so I’m very pleased with how well they’re playing for me. If you’e on a budget like me, I would go out and look for these irons on a good site where they sell new or used demo clubs. I found mine on Kijiji and have yet to be disappointed1

      BeTheBall

      4 years ago

      I just spent big $ on Apex19 and love feel looks and GIR is very good BUT I hit my sons old AP1s much higher and seems much more forgiving for “my swing”, where would my Apex19 fit in this tests since its promoted as a “forged game improvement”? After hitting my sons AP1 so well and seeing this those 300s are tempting, keep up the good work!

      Reply

      JJ

      4 years ago

      Can you explain how strokes gained is computed? The article notes that it is proprietary? So the test eliminates the objective data we golfers used to use to determine things like forgiveness (yards off center, distance from hole, etc.) and instead uses strokes gained, but then refuses to explain how you got to “strokes gained” in this context on the grounds that it is “proprietary”? Whats worse is the forgiveness metric isnt objective or really explained either because it is based on the best strokes gained v. worst strokes gained shots, but we still havent had how you got to strokes gained explained, so the MOST important factor for mos/many (forgiveness) is a complete mystery. Please help us understand this. If not, we are forced to use other tests, and more objective metrics used by your competitors. Thanks

      Reply

      Matt

      4 years ago

      100% agree here! When considering irons you talk about small circles being the most important factor. The last two years you include that in your data and I found it very enlightening. This year it is conspicuously left out of the reporting, right as I am getting ready to invest in a new set of irons…

      Can you reintroduce the yards from hole and/ or shot area size metrics?

      Reply

      JJ

      4 years ago

      no response from anyone at golfspy? This whole mysterious “proprietary” “forgiveness” metric is a farse, and is not only totally unhelpful, but actually misleading. By taking this approach, and refusing to respond to legitimate questions about it, you have destroyed the credibility, reliability, repeatability, and any legitimacy to this test on the most important metric for a game-improvement iron (forgiveness). Back to relying on Maltby’s objective MPF data, and I recommend anyone here looking for assistance with pure forgiveness data use the valuable MPF resource as well.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      4 years ago

      Regarding the calculations. There’s some proprietary stuff we do to account for the fact that irons within any given category can be expected to fly different distances. That’s especially true in the GI category where loft and length ranges are the widest. Once that’s sorted out it”s pretty standard strokes gained stuff. It’s lie condition and the remaining distance to the pin.

      The issue with the distance the hole metric is that it doesn’t take the lie condition into account, and so depending on the dispersion pattern, you will get proximity values that would don’t align with SG values. We know SG is the better metric. Pin proximity is antiquated and so we stopped using it.

      Similar story with our shot area metric. If you’re getting fit, it’s awesome. It works really well for an individual golfer. That said, it’s imperfect, specifically in that it can be inflated by a single shot. Aggregating values across 20+ golfers only exacerbate the issues. Again, strokes gained paints a more complete picture without being as prone to skew.

      The Maltby stuff is great, but I’d wager any club designer will tell you it doesn’t paint a complete picture of forgiveness. It’s heavily driven by geometry and MOI, and while that’s no unimportant, it doesn’t begin to tell you how consistently golfers will deliver a given club or where their particular miss tendencies will be.

      We wanted to simplify our forgiveness metric and make it meaningful in a way that correlates to what you might experience on a golf course.

      As explained in the FAQ, for each tester with each club, we compare the strokes gained differences between a golfer’s best shots and his worst shots. The club with the narrowest average gap between the best shots and the worst shots – the one that produces the most consistent results – is our most forgiving.

      JJ

      4 years ago

      In response to Tony’s response to my comments, I’ll say this: first, strokes gained is not your intellectual property. It was conceived by mark Brodie. So its not proprietary. Second, his general theory and point of that stat is that which gets you closer to the whole gains you strokes versus others. That will be different for every shot and will depend on a variety of factors, including distance most importantly. Without telling us the specifics of the hypothetical hole we are measuring each shot to, including the distance, strokes gained is meaningless, again. Third, lies shouldnt factor into this at all. We golfers want to know how forgiving the clubs are on mishits. Telling us it will result in more strokes gained on a hypothetical and unspecified hole means literally nothing, unless you include more information about this hypothetical hole, among many other things. If not, you are basically misusing, diluting, and dumbing down Brodie’s great work with this and wasting our time in the process.

      Tony Covey

      4 years ago

      Man…reading comprehension isn’t what it used to be. Nowhere did I say anything that should suggest we’ve cornered the market on strokes gained, or that it’s our intellectual property.

      Here’s what I said:

      “There’s some proprietary stuff we do to account for the fact that irons within any given category can be expected to fly different distances.”

      What’s ours is how we apply Mark Broadie’s work to a test environment in which irons are expected to fly different distances.

      Regarding the rest of what you said about lie conditions not being a factor and things being meaningless; all I can say is that basically everyone in golf R&D who we’ve discussed our methodologies with either explicitly disagrees with you, or hasn’t told me otherwise.

      Andrew

      4 years ago

      Boy, these lofts are jaaaacked. How do you compare distance when they aren’t going to a hold a green?

      Reply

      ryebread

      4 years ago

      Exactly. Before the marketing types come in and say “we adjust CG” or “the key is peak height” or “if lofts weren’t strong they’d go too high” or any of that other garbage, look at the data..

      If an iron doesn’t have a decent angle of 45 degrees (or slightly higher) it isn’t going to hold a green very well. There are only two “7” irons in this test that even get a person with this swing speed to 43 degrees. Those two irons still have roll out distance averaging 30 feet (which is the lowest in the test).

      The launch and spin on most of these “7” irons are around where one would expect a “5” iron to be. When viewed through that lens, are these “7” irons really “long” or are they just 5 irons in disguise? The lack of stopping power (decent angle) suggests the latter.

      I honestly feel sorry for a beginner or a senior who picks up any of these sets. They’re likely to be lower in swing speed than this average tester and thus really need hybrids from about the “7” up. Those are really pricey sets if all you can use are 8 – gap wedge. My guess is the average player or beginner might not even recognize that and just be frustrated.

      I think the OEMs have jumped the shark on lofts…..

      Reply

      Joe D

      4 years ago

      Lofts don’t matter as much anymore, launch angle, and to an extent descent angle does.. Back when there were only blades etc yes, loft mattered. But now, with cavity backs, and all of this technology, the GI and SGI clubs (and heck, Players distance) launch higher and faster.

      Look at this article from this site. You have lofts from 35, all the way down to 30. But the variance in launch angle is 20..16 to 21.53, and descent angle, 46.45 to 47.71.

      The highest lofted club had a descent angle of 47.71, while the lowest lofted club (by 5 degrees) had a descent angle of 47.09, but went 19 yard further.

      These manufacturers all have launch monitors, I’m sure.. I’m also pretty sure they test a little. bit. When they put all that tech into making a ball launch higher (good for slower swingers) and faster ball speed, if they left them at traditional launch you’re going to get moon balls.

      Lofts only matter to that particular club, and your swing.
      http://mygolfspy.com/7iron-vs-7iron/

      And if that doesn’t convince you, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8liIXi0qIw

      Old P770 vs M2 vs M1. M2 and M1 did launch lower, but all 3 clubs had a descent angle of 50 degrees for him, with the P770 having 8 yards of rollout, M1 10 yards, M2 9 yards. And Michael Newton is a pretty strong swinger..

      2 yards is not going to cause you to lose the green.

      Again, with all this new tech, if they did not strengthen the lofts, everyone with decent swing speed would launch moon balls.

      Reply

      Mike

      4 years ago

      Honestly, I tell everyone to forget the number that stamped on the club and understand the loft as well as your loft gaps on your audience. Who cares if my iron is stamped with a “6” is 24 or 30 degrees, it’s how you fit that loft into your set. Nothing about irons is really uniform, every OEM has their own probably slightly different specs. And, it’s up to the golfer to see what works for them

      Eric

      4 years ago

      Very little you just said makes sense! Loft do matter… all mfg’g max-out the USGA ball speed, so a supposed 7 iron with 5 iron loft is going to hit a ball further.

      ryebread

      4 years ago

      JoeD: Go look at the mid iron data from this test. While you are correct that the short iron data has fine decent angles, the mid irons do not. There’s not a single one over 45 degrees (all are 43 or lower). There’s not a single long iron over 40 degrees.

      All this “high swing speed guys are going to hit moon balls” stuff is garbage. That might be true for 1-2% of golfers, but GI sets are designed to fit the middle 85% of the curve.

      This is just “winning the 7 iron distance in the store” games. You buy a set of 5-GW, can’t use beyond the 7. Then you need to buy 2 hybrids (more $$$). You “need” wedges below the gap (more $$$). This is about OEMs making more money. Simple as that.

      John

      4 years ago

      I got the PXG 0211’s earlier this year and have been telling my playing partners that they feel like they travel about one club shorter than the Titleist’s I switched from – so I’m glad to see that this test gave a similar conclusion. Disappointing though considering PXG markets their irons as being just as long, if not longer, than the competition

      Reply

      Barry

      4 years ago

      I love these tests- can anyone tell me if they are doing a most wanted fairway wood for 2020! Thanks

      Reply

      MIGREGB

      4 years ago

      Since the 2020 GI Most Wanted data doesn’t include ‘Yards from Center’ & ‘Distance from Hole’ like last year’s report, it’s a little tough to compare some details. But it looks like the only real difference between the 919 & 921 Hot Metal’s is increased spin which results in a shorter carry distance. for the new model So I’m guessing the 921 has improved consistency, otherwise I don’t know why Mizuno would have release them. Personally, I’m VERY happy with my 919 Hot Metal’s. IMHO they have a tough job making much of an improvement. I think going forward, subsequent tests will be easier to compare since they’ll all be done in the same new format. Thank you for the great work!

      Reply

      Dave Bolt

      4 years ago

      This is awesome. I was fitted with T300s in May. Glad to know we made a good choice!

      Reply

      chris

      4 years ago

      Hi, didn’t we use to have “yards from center” and “shot area” on the tableau chart? is this data available for these particular test?

      Reply

      Mike

      4 years ago

      Looking at the numbers, the average 7 iron distance was generally close to 170 yds??? We’re talking about people who use a game improvement iron here, not single digit players, right? I played at an upscale public course & I play with different people every time I go out. Unless they’re damn good golfers, they’re using more than a 7 iron to get out to 170 yds. As a reference, what was the driver speed of the folks you used in these tests? If you have a 90 mph swing speed, you sure as hell are not putting your 7 iron 170 out there unless your smash factor is out-of-this-world.

      BTW, was fitted for the title list t300 at phelp champion early this year. A complete freaking disaster (both the clubs and the experience there). They lasted about a month in my bag before I sold them on eBay (luckily I only bought two irons and not a full set).

      Reply

      JasonA

      4 years ago

      Interesting on distance. AFAICT the roll-out is huge. The 7-iron carry distance given is 158-147. I’m a pretty average golfer, carry for 7 iron is 150 yards with JPX 800 Pro’s. And the irons in test are “hotter”, so I can see average golfer in that test with 155 yards carry, OK. But constantly 11-12 yards roll out? That would be completely out of line for conditions I play in.

      Reply

      Mike

      4 years ago

      My comment followed a similar vein. I’ve read that the average golfers driver swing is very low 90s. At that speed there’s no way you’re hitting a 7 iron 170 yd unless the loss was completely jacked and/or you got a ton of roll. MGS, can you explain how you came up with those numbers for 7-iron,. If you’re using really good players, then say so. Average Joe’s in NO way are hitting the ball that far.

      Michael

      4 years ago

      Explain the strokes gained. If the best is .05 strokes a round better than the average then it is meaningless. If it is something other than strokes gained a round, please explain.

      Reply

      Dr. Morris Socoloff

      4 years ago

      The above article is absolutely great. A real contribution to golfers seeking the “right” informatiion. Keep up the good work.

      Reply

      James

      4 years ago

      Is the JPX 921 HM Pro considered GI?

      Reply

      Ryan

      4 years ago

      I just did an iron fitting within the last week or so, and I hit the T300, D7 Forged, Mavrik, G410, and 921 HMP. In talking with the fitter, his take was that the HMP is designed to be a GI iron – even if Mizuno claims it’s less GI.

      Based on the numbers, I would tend to agree, as I was getting very comparable numbers to the Mavrik and T300 in terms of distance, height, descent angle, dispersion, etc.

      Given my current abilities (getting back into playing after about a 7-8 year hiatus), I’m pretty confident that if the HMP were not GI in nature, the numbers would have strayed quite a bit from the other, clearly GI irons I tested.

      Reply

      Mat

      4 years ago

      MGS: If you need distance in your irons, look no further than a Mavrik
      Also MGS: Mavrik “pitching wedge” loft is 41º

      *facepalm*

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      4 years ago

      PW doesn’t factor into our distance equations.

      *Double facepalm*

      Reply

      GREG

      4 years ago

      Good review of the GI sector. What was most pleasing was the inclusion of the one piece forged Epon model AF 505 in the review. Epon is the premier forging house in the world. A comparison of the lofts tells the story. Is it any wonder that handicap golfers can’t attack tight pins when your ball is coming in hot and low. Distance is not king. One piece forged irons offer unsurpassed feel.

      Reply

      Ian

      4 years ago

      Great test, but why do you compare TM Sim Max OS (which is an SGI) to the Titleist 300? Shouldn’t it be. TM SIM Max instead? I was fitted for both (and Maverick too) and for me personally TM sim max with ns850 shaft was the best option, though titleist was close.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      4 years ago

      Unless the specifications for loft and length clearly put an iron in a different category, we typically defer to the manufacturer. In this case, TaylorMade said the SIM MAX should be classified as GI, not SGI.

      Reply

      dr. bloor

      4 years ago

      Along this line, it’s interesting that Srixon would describe their 5 series as a GI–last time I bought irons, it was a toss-up between the “Player’s Distance” Callaway CF16 and the 545s, and if anything, the Cally’s were a bit more forgiving and longer.

      I don’t think the Srixon brand reallly has a GI offering at the moment, nor do they really need one., as the company has the Cleveland UHX and the XXIO X series (which to me plays like a Cadillac version of the old Srixon 355).

      nakman7

      4 years ago

      Ordered my T300’s with a regular flex AMT black shaft . true temper states shaft’s decrease 3 grams per shaft. What they don’t tell you is they decrease in flex also. My golf shop told me my 6 iron frequency was barely over an A flex and my 5 iron was an A flex. Wondered why I couldn’t hit this set consistently. Don’t understand Titleist’s logic on making the shafts softer too. These irons didn’t work for me

      Reply

      Robert

      4 years ago

      AMT is a “technology” made through True Temper, not Titleist. CPM or Frequency is snake oil at it’s finest. There is no standardized rating for what is considered regular or stiff, or any other “flex” rating. Find a new golf shop, because the people you are seeking knowledge from aren’t providing good data. The reason the longer irons are different is to help you get the ball higher into the air, it’s a valid concept. A poor carpenter blames the hammer.

      Reply

      al berg

      4 years ago

      great review as usual but nice to know which are forged or cast——for some an important factor. I could have missed that info but didn’t see it—-thanks again for best equipment website ever.

      Reply

      George Batty

      4 years ago

      How about testing combo sets? I carry 6, 7 8, 9 irons; 4 wedges and 4 hybrids.

      Reply

      don

      4 years ago

      When a club like the Maverik goes a full club further than say the PXG you can’t compare 7i to 7i . Instead you have to use the PXG 6i because thats what I need to hit to get to the green.

      Reply

      alex

      4 years ago

      I know Sub70’s 739 irons were in last year’s test– and appeared to do well– did they submit for this year’s test?

      Reply

      David Silkroski

      4 years ago

      Any idea where a set of the Sub 70’s would fall in this comparison?

      Reply

      Max Johnson

      4 years ago

      Holy cow, Callaway has gone a full 2 club bump in loft for the Mavrik? 21 USED to be a 3 iron, now its commonly a 4 but theyre calling that a 5? and a 41 degree PW?

      I mean, I suppose I get it from a marketing standpoint, and its probably nice to tell your playing partners “I hit my 5 iron 215 yards” , and when a TOUR player is on TV hitting a “7” iron into a 195 yard hole, it probably helps sales on Monday, but…wow

      Reply

      Jake Claro

      4 years ago

      I think the testing results show the practical weakness of this approach. Negative strokes gained with long and short end of the bag – long irons with progressively stronger lofts would seem to me to be harder to hit for average player, whereas with scoring clubs distance control is going to be more important than pure distance, and getting the right distance/flight combo with a 41 degree pitching wedge that is probably pretty “hot” is going to be challenging as much as manufacturers try to control for these sort of changes. I can see mid-irons finding a sweet spot in a set like this where distance and flight hit an optimal window and perform well or as well as other weaker clubs.

      Reply

      Steve S

      4 years ago

      Your recommendation on iron selection is a good general start but the 10 handicap marker is not the end all for selection. I’ve been a 9-11 for the last couple years but 3 years ago I was hitting more greens, but I was not a very good putter. My putting is measurably better now, but lost distance on the driver so I’m not hitting as many greens. I guess the point is that GI and SGI irons are good choices unless your iron play is stellar or you are a single digit handicap THEN you may want to try blades or players distance irons.

      Reply

      Kevin

      4 years ago

      The problem with generalizations is that they’re generalizations. While blades may be the exclusive domain of great ball strikers, the players distance category fits a much wider range of handicaps than you give it credit for. Case in point, I’m a 20 handicap, and in my recent fitting I hit just about every GI iron on the shelf. They were OK, but far and away the best two irons for me — more height, more spin, more distance, tighter disperson — ended up being the Callaway Apex and Cobra King Forged Tec, both players distance irons. I have a slightly shallower swing (in part because of my height necessitating longer shafts), so the wider soles of GI irons (and especially SGI irons) cause my problems that PD irons avoid.

      Ultimately, the moral of the story is to get fit and don’t allow any preconceived notions of which club you “should” play stand in the way of the numbers.

      Reply

      Steve S

      4 years ago

      I guess I missed making my point. I said that the 10 was a good general start. Are you a 20 because you are a bad driver or a bad short game player? I’ll bet you are younger and have a relatively high swing speed if you can hit the players distance irons well. Strangely enough I hit the blades better the the PD irons because of the blades typically weaker lofts. With my swing speed I get virtually the same distance with much better trajectory. Like you said it’s all about your specific swing and a starting point.

      Brad

      4 years ago

      When does MGS anticipate releasing its Most Wanted Super Game Improvement iron for 2020? The 2019 release came in June 2019, and there has been quite a bit of movement in this space with hybrid irons and even the latest Big Bertha irons. I and many others look forward to hearing from MGS soon.

      Reply

      Phillip Bishop

      4 years ago

      Due to COVID, our testing schedule for the 2020 will be reduced (numerous factors with that). Super Game Improvement will be one of the remaining tests we publish and that will be end of October.

      Reply

      Frank

      4 years ago

      Any update on timing for MGS releasing its Most Wanted Super Game Improvement Iron for 2020?

      Brad

      4 years ago

      When will you release the Most Wanted Super Game Improvement Irons? The 2019 release was June of 2019. There has been quite an influx of hybrid-irons since the last Most Wanted list for Super Game Improvement.

      Thank you- I and others look forward to hearing from MGS soon!

      Reply

      JonD

      4 years ago

      I am perplexed by the relative lack of improvement in irons over the last 15 years.

      In my experience, Drivers have seen dramatic improvements during this period of time. However, irons., by comparison, have seen little if any improvement at best.

      Every couple of years, I go in and “try” to replace my irons.

      In 2015, I took 10 lessons from Golf Tec, at the time they also tried to sell me new irons. They didn’t have anything that performed as good as my circa 2006 gamers

      I remember how jacked I was when the Ping G400s came out in 2016. The marketing guys at Ping touted them as being two clubs longer and one club higher.

      I was so disappointed when I went in to try them only to find the performance was no better than mine..

      I tried again in 2018, got excited about the JPX 919 Hot Metals. but they really weren’t an improvement over my clubs, another disappointment.

      A couple of months ago, I scored my first ace. I had put down 50 cents and won a little over $1,200 in pro shop credit that I need to spend by the first of the year.

      So first on my list was a set of new irons. I figured to put Sims,, Mavriks, JPX 921s or one of the other usual suspects in my bag. I went in to my fitter and spent two hours over two sessions tried a number of clubs, hit tons of shots with multiple shaft configurations. This was head and shoulders above any fitting I had ever experienced.

      When all was said and done, we concluded, after reviewing all the numbers at length, that they just didn’t warrant buying a new set of irons. I was blown away..

      Instead he is going to adjust my lie upright a touch and reduce the loft a little on my 2006 Taylormade R7XDs and they are staying in the bag.

      I’m buying a new driver and one for my wife instead.

      Reply

      Steve S

      4 years ago

      JonD, the reason why you can’t seem to find an improved iron is because your 2006 R7XD’s are an early version of today’s “jacked loft” irons.

      Your 7 iron is 30 degrees with is the loft of my Mizuno MX25 5 iron. And halfway between my 5 and 6 iron Taylormade Burner Plus irons from 2009! Actually the lofts are stronger than the TM 2016 M2’s!

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Wedges
    May 16, 2024
    Wedge Fitting and the Web: PING’s Stake in the Ground
    Golf Shoes
    May 16, 2024
    Pour One Out for NIKE’s Air Zoom Infinity Tour NRG
    Golf Technology
    May 16, 2024
    18 Luxury Golf Gifts We’re Drooling Over