Why are there NINE More Callaway Mavrik Drivers on the USGA Conforming List?
Drivers

Why are there NINE More Callaway Mavrik Drivers on the USGA Conforming List?

Why are there NINE More Callaway Mavrik Drivers on the USGA Conforming List?

Your read that headline right. Earlier this week, Callaway (and the USGA) put another NINE Mavrik heads on the conforming clubs list. That’s nine in addition to what was already there.

Let’s count together

  • Mavrik (Version 2) – one diamond
  • Mavrik (Version 2) (LH) – one diamond
  • Mavrik 440 (LH)
  • Mavrik Max (Tour)
  • Mavrik Max (Version 1)
  • Mavrik Max (Version 2) – one diamond
  • Mavrik Sub Zero (Tour)
  • Mavrik Sub Zero (Version 2) – one diamond
  • Mavrik Sub Zero (Version 2) (LH) – one diamond

Nine

Some of you may be fired up, but I’m going to ask everyone to chill out for just a minute and not just think rationally but to think about the future.

Obviously, there’s some redundancy here with the left-handed stuff, and anything with a diamond stamped on the hosel isn’t likely to see a retail shelf soon either.

The same is probably true for anything with Tour or Version 2 in the name. That left-handed 440 – that’s almost certainly intended for a specific guy.

That leaves us with Mavrik Max as the one that’s likely to be relevant to you and me…at least in the short term. The reasonable assumption here is that MAX will have the same meaning it does in the PING lineup – and based on some leaked photos, the same is probably true for TaylorMade as well.

It appears that Max now has an industry-wide agreed upon spec.

Cool.

Bottom line, Mavrik Max is likely to join the nondescript Mavrik and Mavrik Sub Zero in a trio of retail offerings.

Breaking it down, what we’ve seen so far suggests Mavrik is for the middle of the bell curve. Sub Zero will be for the better player, or the guy trying to kill spin. Max will serve the guy looking for increased (MAXimum) consistency, forgiveness, or whatever your preferred word for balls go to the same place (give or take) happens to be.

The Future of Driver Customization?

14 (the total number of Mavriks currently on the USGA List) would be absurd, but three models is perfectly reasonable (and manageable for the retail guys). But what’s the deal with the others?

The answer comes down to Callaway’s AI-drive Flash Face Technology. “This [AI] allows us to have essentially bespoke drivers in the purest sense,” says Sean Toulon, SVP at Callaway (and GM of OGIO).

The implication here is that, like everybody else’s, each of Callaway’s retail offerings are designed to fit a type of player, but through the power of AI, it has a growing capability to design for a specific player. The heads in this new and seemingly excessive basket of tour stuff may each be designed to fit one or maybe two players. They may look nearly the same, but there’s more to the individual heads than meets the eye.

“The differences in each of the heads is pretty significantly different in that we totally redesign the face (ai) depending on the mass properties of the head,” says Toulon. As Callaway continues to learn and its super-computers continue to eat inputs and spit out answers, some of what the company learns from tour pros could make its way to you and I…someday…maybe.

“We will have more designs on tour and decide over time we want to commercialize more of them, says Toulon. We have a lot more R&D capabilities now than ever before and are therefore capable of solving in ways that we could before. AI is fueling that. It’s honestly awesome and has a long runway.”

Let’s hope the plane doesn’t crash or skid off that runway before any of this matters.

It’s safe to assume it’s a long way off, but we could reach the point where customizing your Callaway driver will go far beyond choosing some paint colors. A few generations from now, tools might exist to fit golfers into the right combination of not just head and shaft, but also face.

It makes sense, but is it achievable?

We’ll see…

For You

For You

Golf Technology
Apr 25, 2024
Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
Golf Bag Carts
Apr 25, 2024
Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
News
Apr 24, 2024
Are You Wearing the Right Size Shoe?
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Mike

      4 years ago

      You’re going to need store reps / fitters that have “Callaway-certified” training, or “Callaway configured launch monitors” to figure out which MAVRIK head and face is best suited for every golfer.

      I wonder if buyers are going to be patient enough to go through this fitting process, especially if they are considering multiple driver brands.

      Reply

      SV

      4 years ago

      I’m more of a Cobra rather than Callaway person, but I can think of at least one other person that might be interested in the Mavrik 440 (LH))!

      Reply

      TenBuck

      4 years ago

      My guess is that these clubs will be fitted with some kind of a different face for different swings/distances. Kind of smart on their part because it would limit the aftermarket club purchases unless your swing to face is matched. Just my guess.

      Reply

      George

      4 years ago

      Wow these look awful no thanks

      Reply

      John Monteagudo

      4 years ago

      I love Callaway and would love to see custom AI faces as part of the fitting process but I gotta say. These drivers look ugly.

      Reply

      Dave Winn

      4 years ago

      To me, the hottest driver is still the Titleist D917. The ball just explodes off the club face and it has 48 different adjustment settings. Some of the new drivers with the graphite head feel like your hitting the ball with a feather and the ball goes nowhere.. i bought a Ping G400 due to the MGS reviews and immediately lost 20 yards from the D917.

      Reply

      Dave’s Dad

      4 years ago

      Dave’s right….color TV and automatic transmissions haven’t necessarily produced better results.. I always enjoyed the experience of dial-up internet, “websites” say cable internet is faster, but not for me…or my son Dave.

      Get off my lawn!!!!!!

      Reply

      scott

      4 years ago

      I’m a Callaway guy they do make the best all around drivers on the market but doesn’t the bottom look like a Taylormade M2.

      Reply

      P.J.

      4 years ago

      What’s old is new again!! Innovation is about tapped out in golf drivers, so now it comes down to marketing.

      Reply

      HDTVMAN

      4 years ago

      Callaway “MAX” v Ping “MAX”…I’ll take the Ping!

      Reply

      Scott

      4 years ago

      I’m a California physic and I’m going to give you a one time only free reading…. I see in my minds eye, a full set of Ping clubs in the truck of your 5 year old Volvo.. with a bumper sticker that say’s Hillary in 2016

      Reply

      Danny

      4 years ago

      Haha awesome! Look up the definition of physic and tell me you really meant to use that word. Epic snark fail. How apropos.

      Holeinone

      4 years ago

      Scott
      Please grow up!

      daviddvm

      4 years ago

      Nice insite Tony!
      Keep up the great work.

      Reply

      Hank

      4 years ago

      I have been looking for a smaller headed driver to upgrade from my OptiForce 445. Looks like the only way is to start playing lefty..

      Reply

      JW

      4 years ago

      That one won’t be available at retail either.

      Reply

      cody

      4 years ago

      After playing the epic flash SZ triple diamond since it came out. I love that callaway released it and hope they do the same with the mav. I love that the are trying to reach as many players as possible and appeal to different playing styles.

      I just hope they get released and are not tour only versions.

      Reply

      Dave Tutelman

      4 years ago

      I don’t see the average, or even somewhat-better-than-average golfer being able to play clubs that were designed for one guy on tour. The skill levels are too different. The ideal driver for one will be very different from the ideal driver for the other. That doesn’t mean they won’t sell them; always customers who want to play exactly the club that their favorite player hits, even if it damages their game and score.

      I’m surprised that they are using the airplane-runway metaphor, especially in conjunction with naming their club a “MAX” variant of a successful design. One would think that, this year at least, you would be trying to avoid any mental association with Boeing.

      Reply

      Golfjones

      4 years ago

      Do you guys know who Dave Tutelman is? He is truly a genius, a polymath, a world’s expert on a large variety of golf topics. He is an engineer by training and a physics whiz. And a golfer.

      He has a fascinating website:
      https://www.tutelman.com/golf/

      If you are like me you will find it captivating and spend way too much time on the site going from topic to topic.

      Reply

      Dave Tutelman

      4 years ago

      Thank you, GolfJones.

      MJ B

      4 years ago

      Perfect recommendation for the truly serious golf geeks. If you get into it, it also kills a few myths and misunderstandings. To truly understand it, you would benefit from having a basic knowledge about the laws of physics. :-)

      Stuart Anderson

      4 years ago

      For years I have gone back to this web site for information..You will better understand the game of golf just reading it.

      Bob Pegram

      4 years ago

      I recently bought an 816 Alpha DBD driver from Callaway Pre-owned. It looked brand new. I can move the center of gravity to the toe or heel, high or low.. There is also a changeable weight in the back of the sole. It is extremely adjustable as far as center of gravity as well as the hosel adjustments. I am surprised Callaway didn’t keep making heads with this amount of adjustability. Apparently they have started doing it again. Hopwever, what are the face differences on the Maveriks?
      By the way, the 816 driver works phenomenally well. I also got the matching 14 degree 3 wood and 18 degree 5 wood. They also work very well – much better than my old fairways.. Very easy to hit long and especially hit it straight.

      Reply

      Rich M

      4 years ago

      Nice Bottoms,. look forward to seeing the Tops.

      Reply

      Bob forberg

      4 years ago

      Where are these leaked photos of the new Taylor Made Max drivers?? Would love to take a peek!!

      Reply

      Robin

      4 years ago

      Even if my my whole club was a neon colored ,I would still only concentrate on the target then the ball… I have been through to much to let a golf club bother me.

      Reply

      Hawk

      4 years ago

      I’ve always thought that Callaway, for all of their attempts to push product like TM used to, makes good products that perform well in testing. I agree with Tony in the article that we will probably only see 3 of those drivers come to retail. And it really isn’t all that crazy when you look at Titleist and their 4 driver lineup. All of this being said, as someone who works in golf and does try to convince my members to buy products from me and not a big box store, I think this particular driver will suffer because it just doesn’t look like it will have the same shelf appeal as other drivers that they’ve come out with in the past. I won’t try to pass too many judgments until I get a change to see it in person tho.

      Reply

      TenBuck

      4 years ago

      It’s all about the sales, tech only plays a small part. Every year it’s farther, better forgiveness and more speed. COR hasn’t moved at all so marketing has to figure out how to sell more clubs.

      Reply

      PRM43616

      4 years ago

      Where is the moveable weight? Is that a think of the past?

      Reply

      Rick Nguyen

      4 years ago

      From a brand and P&L perspective, it’s a super smart move. Custom fitting is where the growth is on profitability. From a competitive standpoint, more skus means less for the competition if they can leverage their channel and take up available open to buy dollars from resellers. It’s a great brand position for the consumers as there are more options to fit the individual golfer. I gotta say this isn’t cheap to pull off and wonder what the product life cycle will be. If they adhere to what’s been happening in the industry then it’s a big risk in both inventory and marketing spend if this doesn’t shoot out of the gate. I give them a lot of credit for making this move and I’m sure their technology gives them the confidence to support this endeavor.

      Reply

      Kevin

      4 years ago

      It is really interesting that the face design changes with the head design. I would have assumed that the face design would stay pretty consistent even from driver to fairway wood. You just shrink your most forgiving face to fit, but apparently that’s not the case. I honestly had zero interest in Mavrik, but maybe there is something there under the not so good looking surface.

      Reply

      Caroline

      4 years ago

      Keep tweaking the balls, clubs and electronic swing aids until everyone is in the 70’s and the Pro’s cannot make a living because the cost of staying relevant and shooting in the 50’s is their only hope. Maybe the R@A and USGA need to step in and make the game a little more “SKILL” involved….Dear Ben Hogan where ever you are the game is still trying to produce your twin from a test tube.

      Reply

      shortside

      4 years ago

      Visit a public course any day of the week. That’s where the majority of golfers are found. Hang out by the 1st and 10th tee box for 1 hour each. Then do the same at 9th and 18th greens. Your concerns will be put to rest.

      Reply

      DRAINTHESWAMPGOLFER

      4 years ago

      ^Very true. Most golfers literally hit it all over the face and are looking for balls in the rough. I’m certain that they need all the help they can get. That being said, I’m all in for bifurcation of the ball and club regulation. for the pros. Hate to see some of those classic courses get shredded.

      Mark M

      4 years ago

      OR even better, spend a couple of minutes watching golfers on the range. It’s a sight to behold. Only takes about 30 seconds to find out if there are any good players out there – the rest need all the help they can get.

      Dave Tutelman

      4 years ago

      I’m replying to Draintheswampgolfer…

      You’re my kind of guy. Bifurcation makes sense. It is done in many other sports, though not all.

      About 20 years ago, I had a conversation with Alastair Cochran, who was the chief technical adviser to the R&A. He said the R&A took a survey of its members, and the members emphatically opposed bifurcation. So that may be a non-starter. I would hope for a more recent survey, including the USA, and casual golfers, not just members of the governing body. But I don’t really expect that to happen. So…

      If not bifurcation, I’d rather see the Tour players “shred” the existing courses than accept equipment that reduces distance for EVERYBODY. Summary – I’d prefer, in order of choice:
      (1) Bifurcation.
      (2) No new limitations on distance.
      (3) Protect par from the tour pros, at any cost to the average golfer. Please don’t do #3.

      Bill

      4 years ago

      I think you’ll find that with all of the technology that’s been introduced over the years, handicaps have not gotten better.

      Reply

      scott

      4 years ago

      With all the high tech golf clubs on the market they won’t help unless you got a high tech swing… I shoot in the 70s and only once have I got close to the to shooting 69 and that day it was more about the putt then the driver.. . I do agree clubs are more forgiving but they’ll never make you play better. They might keep you from losing as many golf balls.

      Reply

      Bob Pegram

      4 years ago

      I have seen studies that show even tour pro scores have not gotten much better since the early 2000s. The only exception mentioned was a few lower scores by leaders that they could not produce consistently.. Unfortunately I don’t remember where I read it.

      Simon

      4 years ago

      You do realize that the R&A haven’t changed anything on the regulations relating to conformity of equipment. If you think that all the tech wizardry is really improving people then you are just following blindly the marketing. Look at driving distances on the PGA and it hasn’t really change for nearly 10 years – perhaps by 2-3 yards hardly a sport wrecker is it.

      Reply

      Berniez40

      4 years ago

      I’m guessing the logic is—“If you’re going to step into a huge steaming pile—you may as well go all the way.” I really hate dissing something so harshly out of the gate—but this thing is Coyote Ugly. It is going to have to do monstrously well on the MGS Most Wanted Drivers List just for me to dare be seen swinging this ugly stick.

      Reply

      Dan Weitzel

      4 years ago

      I keep hearing how ugly this club is, and I don’t get it. The sole is not my favorite but I have seen the clubs firsthand repeatedly (I am a Callaway custom fitter) and the only thing that really matters to me is the look at address, and I don’t see anything that glaring from that perspective. What am I missing?

      Reply

      Rick Nguyen

      4 years ago

      As a custom fitter, how is the performance from your perspective? Key take aways?

      Berniez40

      4 years ago

      THe sole is way to busy, and at your point, I am not a fan of Orange, Green, Blue, Yelllow, etc….. Drivers…….GIve me Grey, Black, or Merlot anyday. The pastel colours, even when not glossy, simply look cheap. After I drop that many dollars on a club I want it to look business-like…able to do its job. Cheezey, Bright, Feel Good Stuff doesn’t do it for me when I’m trying to concentrate on smacking something long and straight into the short grass.

      Jmarkus

      4 years ago

      agreed. i haven’t seen a pic at address yet.

      Dan Weitzel

      4 years ago

      hi Rick – too soon to tell – I have heads and finished clubs on order. I have heard really good things from the rep, but that is not a surprise. Contact me in a month or so and I can give you better feedback.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Technology
    Apr 25, 2024
    Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
    Golf Bag Carts
    Apr 25, 2024
    Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
    News
    Apr 24, 2024
    Are You Wearing the Right Size Shoe?
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.