LAB – Teeless Golf Driver
Drivers

LAB – Teeless Golf Driver

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

LAB – Teeless Golf Driver

Teeless Driver

There’s a plethora of golf infomercials. Is the Teeless Golf Driver the one that actually helps golfers?

Let’s see what our testing proves. Read before you buy.

Teeless Driver – Who is it for?

 

Every infomercial golf product claims it can help golfers. Teeless is no different. It targets golfers who struggle with fairway woods and swing below 100 mph.

Despite being 13 degrees of loft, the Teeless Driver is designed to limit fat or chunky shots and essentially be a better option versus your current 3-wood or driver. Hitting the ball higher is the goal, especially from tight lies. Many higher-handicap golfers struggle with this.

In terms of where you can use the Teeless, it is more of a “where can you not use it?” Off the tee box, fairway, rough sand or even out of a divot, it is supposed to be forgiving and easy to hit.

Testing Parameters

We wanted to see if the newest Teeless Driver can live up to the standard set by the original, which we have tested in the past.

Our testing parameters for this are different than our general, Most Wanted Tests. For this test, we wanted to put this product through two real world scenarios or playing conditions. After all, the Teeless Driver is promoted to be hit from various types of lies. Shots were hit from a bunker and the turf. Each shot was assigned a pass, fail or neutral rating from each corresponding tester.

  • Pass – Distance, Launch, and Direction met the approval of the tester.
  • Neutral – As the name suggests, a neutral shot outcome. Simply put, testers would not want to re-hit the shot.
  • Fail – Distance, Launch, and Direction did not meet testers’ approval.

Testers hit their current gamer 3-wood and the Teeless Driver. Ten testers with swing speeds ranging from 80 to 95 mph each hit 10 shots with each club from all conditions.

Teeless Driver Lab Results

  • Gamer – 63% of shots receive a passing grade
  • Teeless – 49% of shots receive a passing grade

One of Teeless’s claims is hitting from various lies and getting the ball in the air. According to our data, shot outcomes out of the bunker did not confirm that.

  • Gamer – 71% of shots receive a passing grade
  • Teeless – 62% of shots receive a passing grade

Hitting off turf is challenging with a fairway wood or metalwood, let alone a driver. This is where the design of the Teeless shines. The likelihood of a fat shot is low.

Is Newer Better?

What differences are there between the first generation of the Teeless and the newest version? The newest addition’s face is made of maraging steel (aka “spring steel”). The purpose is simple: higher ball speeds. Faster ball speed is arguably the one thing the original Teeless Driver lacked.

Statistically, the Teeless Driver didn’t live up to the standards set by its predecessor, especially out of a bunker. It brings forth the reality that newer is not necessarily better. A few testers still game the original Teeless Driver as their fairway wood.

Seeing the two versions side by side was eye-opening.

Teeless Driver – A Closer Look

  • The newest version of the Teeless driver does not launch the ball higher than its predecessor. The ball flight on the current Teeless is much more penetrating and piercing versus the ballooning flight of the original. Now, there are individuals who like this performance or may benefit from this type of shot outcome.
  • There is a “right” bias for the new Teeless Driver. Our testing pool’s misses were predominantly to the right or “fading” for right-handers.
  • The forgiveness and design of the Teeless Driver is legitimate. One of the biggest issues with fairway woods is consistency off the turf or out of the bunker. If you struggle with heavy or fat shots with a fairway wood, Teeless might be your remedy.

Teeless Driver – Is It For You?

Look, this is a niche product. A beginner golfer or high-handicap golfer might benefit.

Its predecessor certainly has our backing. But this new iteration is lacking bona-fide improvements.

For a beginner golfer, the Teeless Driver might be worth a spot in your golf bag. You can use it as a driver or a fairway wood. Shoot, it can free up a spot in your bag since it can literally be your driver AND fairway wood.

If you are a higher handicap golfer and your tendency is to hit it high with lots of spin, the Teeless might be a great option for you. We saw it produce a lower trajectory which might benefit your game.

However, if there is a choice between this new version and the old one, the old one shouldn’t be leaving your bag.

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS


Amount

Frequency

For You

For You

First Look
May 9, 2024
Melin Hits the Green With Links Front 9 Collection
Golf Technology
May 9, 2024
We Tried It: SwingU Golf GPS and Shot-Tracking App
News
May 9, 2024
The Best Vintage Golf Shirts I Found on eBay
Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Cancer Survivor. Amputee Golfer. Essentially, a OneLeggedBoss. When he isn't facilitating testing or analyzing data, Phillip enjoys his family time, practicing and playing golf, unwinding with video games, capturing photos of nature, or devouring pretzels.

Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Driver Titleist TSR3 3 Wood Titleist TSR3
Driving Iron Titleist U505 Irons (5-6) Titleist T200
Irons (7-PW) Titleist T150 Wedges (50, 56, 60) Titleist Vokey SM10
Putter L.A.B. Mezz.1 Max Ball Titleist Pro V1x
Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Bob Dignan

      11 months ago

      I have one of these clubs. I am 79 and currently a 19.1 index but have been as low as a 10. I have been having problems with hooking my drives for years. I can carry my Taylormade M-1 about 190 to 210 yards. This club seems a bit shorter but seems to have less dispersion. Yesterday I hit 9 of 12 fairways on which I used it (still shot 93). The course I play is tight, and I usually manage only about 3 to 5 fairways. Tee shots (using a short or broken tee) do not seem to curve as much with this club as with the M-1. I also feel like I can get decent pop without swinging as hard, and if I want to I can swing harder with less risk. I got this club b for $100 out of a barrel, so it apparently did not work for its previous owner, but it is staying in my bag for now. I am glad this site reviews this type of club. I have taken many lessons, some of which have been helpful, but none have solved my LOFT problem (Lack Of F***ing Talent). I think this club is worth a shot for anyone who struggles persistently with their driver. I have not tried it as a fairway wood. I have a Taylormade Burner 3 wood that works pretty well for me. I probably will check this club out from the fairway at some point however.

      Reply

      Joel Halprin

      1 year ago

      This looks like a club that will fill a void for me. As a Sr golfer, with only a 73mpg speed. I’d like to test this club.

      Reply

      Jack Krayson

      1 year ago

      As a senior player with fading swing speed, would love to try this club. Hoping it will give me a little more oomph on the course.

      Reply

      Gary Goetz

      1 year ago

      As I’m getting older (72) I need something like this. Looks like it could really help me to get the ball up quick and would be easier to hit.
      Thanks, Gary

      Reply

      Rex Diamond

      1 year ago

      As a slower swing golfer I may fit the demographic for this. I’d love to test it.

      Reply

      Blair Criminger

      1 year ago

      Would love to try this out….but I know you never select women for testings new gear. I have a solid group of ladies in our mid 40’s, who play 3/4 times each week…most of us are 10-12 handicaps…happy to share with all and give multiple perspectives.

      Reply

      Jim vickroy

      1 year ago

      I would love to try this. Fairway woods are sometimes a problem. Looking for more distance.

      Reply

      Michael Cochran

      1 year ago

      I am to start testing. Senior, 85 mph driver speed. Be happy to test anything you have.

      Reply

      Steve Sowa

      1 year ago

      Steve S. – Pittsburgh
      Sign me up.
      I’m an older golfer losing distance. I’ll try or test anything if it wil help.

      Reply

      Jack Jordan

      1 year ago

      I would love to give this driver a try. I hit it shorter each passing year and need all the help I can get.

      Reply

      Weem Williams

      1 year ago

      Where the heck do you sign up ??

      Reply

      john young

      1 year ago

      Never know… just might help and old guy like me… THANKS

      Reply

      scott

      1 year ago

      No matter what new club that comes on the market, to fix your swing problem . It’s never the tool that’s the problem it’s the operator. who’s swinging the club.

      Reply

      Steven L. Hale Sr.

      1 year ago

      Nothing more than ANOTHER “FAILED” copy of the Original ADAMS GOLF Fairway Rescue Club(s), that ACTUALLY “WORKED”!!!

      Reply

      League Golfer

      1 year ago

      I have this club. A friend gave it to me because he didn’t like it. It’s ok, I want to game it, and I hit it well, but I hit others better. The shaft is stiffer than you would expect, so that is a detriment. I think the article should have included more than just two pictures of the club. The club does have a nicely cambered bottom the face from heal to toe, so that is good. A picture of the previous model would have been good for comparison sake. The “new” model has been available for quite a long time. I received mine in the summer of 2021 and I think it had been out for a long time at that point.
      Phillip, on a “pretzel note” try Unique Snacks Extra Salt pretzels. They are my favorite.

      Reply

      Ant

      1 year ago

      Why are there tee marks on the bottom of the (T)less driver…D’on

      Reply

      Chris

      1 year ago

      …and why are they so far apart? Nothing like heal and toe strikes to really see how a club will perform in my world.

      Reply

      Bob

      1 year ago

      Paying a qualified golf professional for lessons will always out perform any do all golf club

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      Philip, I guess no good deed goes unpunished. I’m not sure why people react SO to negatively to a review of an out-of-the-ordinary product. So what, you won’t use it. 98% of the clubs/specific items reviewed on MGS I wouldn’t use, but I usually read the articles anyway, just in the sense that it may be interesting.

      Lighten up folks. No one stole your cheese.

      Reply

      Tim

      1 year ago

      Thanks Dad!

      Reply

      Steve S

      1 year ago

      Mike, we are being “negative” because MGS claims to be “datacentric” and the data shows that this “out of the ordinary product” doesn’t perform. But they say to try it anyway. Why?

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      I should have been clearer in my post.

      I have no idea why anyone would recommend it, I was merely commenting that the fact that the article they ran about an out of the ordinary product got so lambasted.

      Garry Delaplane

      1 year ago

      👍👍👍

      Reply

      Mike B

      1 year ago

      There’s a reason our Gamers are our Gamers, they work!

      I’m not surprised that the the infomercial “doall” club didn’t win. seems like every year or so a company pops up with a smaller, shorter driver with more loft, and promises of unlimited forgiveness, and very long, too. None of them fix a bad swing. I haven’t seen any that outperform clubs from Titleist, Ping, Callaway and TaylorMade.

      Reply

      Tim

      1 year ago

      Unnecessary review!

      Reply

      Paul

      1 year ago

      Not sure how it would help a beginner.

      Reply

      Tampon Woods

      1 year ago

      LOL why would you even consider looking at this silly thing? And then give it an improper, incomplete report?

      Reply

      Todd A

      1 year ago

      Look, not everything is as it seems…. sometimes there are strings attached (pun fully intended).

      People watch these infomercials and get excited. MGS does a great service of cutting through the BS with objective data based feedback.

      Don’t you wish they could have prevented you from buying those growth pills :-) (just busting chops, so please read as well intended humor).

      Reply

      Charlie

      1 year ago

      I picked up the 13* Teeless early last year. I use it mostly in the Fairways. But it is exceptional for punchiuts from the rough, it’s gotten me out from under trees and it still has enough oomph to get me a decent amount closer to the hole. It definitely takes some getting used to. I finally tried a 9 hole stretch using it off the tee. 7 out of 7 Fairways and set me up for an even par 9. Makes me wonder why I don’t do that all the time. It’s not quite as long as my driver, but straight every shot. I happen to like the penetrating flight which gives it more roll out in the soggy Northeast springs. It’s in my bag, and will be for awhile

      Reply

      steve s

      1 year ago

      OK, what am I missing? You are all about data and the data shows that the folks gamer 3 woods perform better than this infomercial special. Why wood you recommend it at all?

      Reply

      Ian

      1 year ago

      They are all about data, but don’t provide it any more. Waste of time reading their articles now in my opinion.

      Reply

      Dave Tutelman

      1 year ago

      Am I missing something here? The test seems to show the “gamer” 3-wood as being superior from the turf (71% to 62%). But the text, both about the test and for the rest of the article, seems to endorse the Teeless from turf. What am I missing?

      Reply

      Gene daigneault

      1 year ago

      Lab or no lab. Just leave the game of golf
      The way it’s supposed to be. Don’t ruin the best sport in the world bye using the concept of the treeless club. Let’s face it I’m 66 years young and at one time I was a 2
      Handy capper and a 97 percent off the tee tee tee tee ok you get it. Now let’s let the game stay the way it was ment to be played. And try to help the older golfers with new technology with new club design. All I’m asking you please leave the ball on the tee. And have fun with the way golf was intended to be played
      Please go in a different direction. And bye the way I love everything you guys have done for the golf world
      Keep up the professional and outstanding
      Work.

      Reply

      JJimbo

      1 year ago

      Hi Phillip Bishop: Thank you for publishing this review of the Teeless Driver… despite some critical comments here, i have been genuinely interested in this mini-driver/ ‘thriver’, and very much appreciate MGS’ coverage of not just mainstream OEMs but also infomercial clubs.

      I think this wide coverage is a differentiator for MyGolfSpy, and why i keep coming back to MGS as a trusted golf website

      … Conversely, a cynic might opine that the near-100% “only mainstream OEMs” focus on other golf review sites = a function of focussing on only the brands that provide them with advertising dollars??

      ====

      Hi Mr Tutelman: I’m guessing you are “the Dave Tutelman” (widely-honored as a golf =-technology ‘savant’!). Thanks for your generosity in publishing your research, which is oft-referenced on MGS, GolfWRX Forums, GolfDigest, etc.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    First Look
    May 9, 2024
    Melin Hits the Green With Links Front 9 Collection
    Golf Technology
    May 9, 2024
    We Tried It: SwingU Golf GPS and Shot-Tracking App
    News
    May 9, 2024
    The Best Vintage Golf Shirts I Found on eBay