The Maxfli Tour Costs $15 Less Than A Pro V1. Ball Lab Shows You What That Difference Looks Like.
Labs

The Maxfli Tour Costs $15 Less Than A Pro V1. Ball Lab Shows You What That Difference Looks Like.

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

The Maxfli Tour Costs $15 Less Than A Pro V1. Ball Lab Shows You What That Difference Looks Like.

The Maxfli Tour is a $39.99 urethane golf ball sold exclusively at DICK’S Sporting Goods and Golf Galaxy and it’s one we’ve spent time with beyond just our Ball Lab. If you’ve read my piece on playing only Maxfli balls for 45 days, you already know the on-course story. What Ball Lab can tell you is what’s happening inside the box. We measured weight, diameter, compression, roundness and balance across 36 balls and three boxes to give you the manufacturing side of that picture.

Here’s what the 2025 Maxfli Tour looks like under the microscope.

Maxfli Tour

Pros

  • Diameter consistency rated B-plus and weight consistency rated B
  • Compression symmetry rated B-minus at 1.75 points; individual balls are internally consistent

Cons

  • Compression consistency rated C with a 13.7-point spread and a range running from 86 to 100
  • Two of 36 balls were flagged as bad — a 94.4% Good Ball rate is average

Our Verdict

The 2025 Maxfli Tour earns a Quality Score of 82 and a B-minus grade. Diameter consistency and weight consistency are the relative bright spots, both grading in the B range. Compression consistency grades at C and is the primary drag on the overall score, ranking in the bottom quartile of the database. Two of 36 balls were flagged as bad, bringing the Good Ball Rate to 94.4 percent and a grade of B-plus.

Product details

  • Price: $39.99/dozen
  • Construction: 3-piece urethane
  • Compression: 90 (Firm)
  • Factory: Foremost, Taiwan
  • Diameter: 1.6809 inches
  • Weight: 1.6042 ounces
  • Bad Balls: 2 of 36 (5.6%)

Test results

The 2025 Maxfli Tour scored 82 and earned a B-minus grade. The Maxfli Tour is dragged down by compression consistency that graded at C with a spread that lands in the bottom quartile of the database.

Good Ball Rate came in at 94.4 percent. Two of 36 balls were flagged as bad, neither tied to a specific category-level defect in cores, layers or covers. Both bad golf balls were related to compression and they were both found in the first box. Compression in boxes two and three was generally consistent.

Compression symmetry averaged 1.75 points, right in line with the field average of 1.9. Compression consistency is where the profile takes its hit, grading at C with a delta of 13.7 points and a spread running from 86.3 to 100.0. That is a wide window for a firm urethane ball and means balls at opposite ends of that range will perform differently.

Diameter consistency graded at B-plus. The sample showed no consistent pole-versus-seam pattern with 17 of 36 balls falling within gauge noise and no sample-wide shape bias identified. Weight consistency graded at B.

If not for the compression consistency issues, the Maxfli Tour would be a straightforward recommendation. The physical manufacturing profile holds up well. But compression is the category that matters most for ball-to-ball performance predictability and that is where the Maxfli Tour fell short.

With a score of 82, the 2025 Maxfli Tour does not earn a quality recommendation. Compression consistency is the primary reason it doesn’t score higher.

Find the Right Golf Ball for Your Game

Use the MyGolfSpy Golf Ball Selector to compare 48 golf balls using data from our 2026 robot test. Filter by swing speed and see how each ball performs from driver to wedge to find the best fit for your game.

Tony Covey
Tony Covey
Employee #2, Editor, Jack of All Trades

Compression

Compression is a measure of how much force is required to deform a golf ball; the higher the number, the firmer the ball. Consistency matters because a ball that compresses differently from shot to shot produces different results from shot to shot. Ball Lab measures every ball individually and tracks both the average and the spread across the sample.

The 2025 Maxfli Tour averaged 90.4, in the firm range of our database. Compression consistency graded at C with a delta of 13.7 points and a spread running from 86.3 to 100.0. That’s well below the database average of 9.7. In simple terms, the firmest ball in the sample and the softest ball in the sample are not the same product.

Ball Lab also measures compression symmetry which tracks how evenly compression is distributed across three points on each individual ball. Is each ball consistent within itself? The Maxfli Tour averaged 1.75 points of deviation, right in line with the field average of 1.9. A neutral result that neither helps nor hurts.

The charts below detail the compression measurements in our sample.

Weight

Weight consistency is another metric Ball Lab tracks. Even small differences across a dozen balls can translate to inconsistent ball flight. Ball Lab weighs every ball to four decimal places.

The 2025 Maxfli Tour averaged 1.6042 ounces across 36 balls, on the lighter end of the database. Every ball cleared the USGA maximum of 1.6205 ounces with a range running from 1.5998 to 1.6074 and a standard deviation of 0.0019. No outliers and no violations.

Weight consistency grades out at B.

The charts below detail the weight measurements in our sample.

Diameter

A ball that isn’t uniform in shape can track offline on the putting green or produce inconsistent flight in the air. Ball Lab measures each ball across multiple axes to get a true picture of its shape.

The 2025 Maxfli Tour averaged 1.6809 inches, above the USGA minimum of 1.680, with a roundness deviation of 0.0006 inches. Every ball cleared the minimum and the sample showed no consistent pole-versus-seam pattern.

Diameter consistency graded out at B-plus, the strongest category on the card.

The charts below detail the diameter measurements in our sample.

Ball Lab report card

Each Quality Score is a weighted average of five grades: good ball rate, compression consistency, compression symmetry, diameter consistency, weight consistency. Our scoring system punishes defective balls more severely while giving greater weight to compression metrics than to weight and diameter.

Get more from MyGolfSpy

Create a free account to build your golfer profile and get personalized recommendations from our testing.

[uwp_register]

For You

For You

Bounty Club Bounty Club
News
Sep 14, 2026
I Played Justin Timberlake’s Ultra-Exclusive Nashville Course. It’s A Top-10 For Me.
Instruction
Sep 14, 2026
“Hit It Thin To Win.” Is That Even True?
Instruction
Sep 14, 2026
Should My Hands Be Behind the Ball With A Driver?
Preferred Source
Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Britt Olizarowicz is a scratch golfer, former teaching professional and one of MyGolfSpy’s leading voices on equipment testing and golf performance. She has spent more than 15 years working at private clubs in New York and Florida and now specializes in translating test data and swing mechanics into practical advice for everyday golfers. Britt began playing at age 7 and has never left the game. When she’s not writing, you’ll find her on the course, playing pickleball, cooking, running or out on the boat with her family.

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz





      Frank musolino

      3 weeks ago

      The only problem I had with one maxfli tour is I cracked it, and my club head speed is only 88 to 90 miles per hour. I called Dicks and they sent me a dozen for 16.00. I still like that model.

      Reply

      Tim H

      3 weeks ago

      Hey MGS folks, do you think that the compression inconsistency you measure in the lab is accurately reflected in the ball test data? If I look at the dashboard from the ball test, the Maxfli Tour had better measured dispersion than the Pro V1.
      Hmm….
      https://26balltest.mygolfspy.com/static/ball_compare.html?config_id=68&models=26BALL_Maxfli_Tour_X%2C26BALL_Titleist_Pro_V1%2C26BALL_Maxfli_Tour

      Reply

      storm3

      3 weeks ago

      I believe that these were a different sample vs what was included in the ball test. The poor lab result appears to be focused around a single box with the other two having above average variance. The sample used for the ball test could have been closer to the two “good” boxes which could explain the performance results. The point of measuring physical attribute consistency in addition to performance is that most of the time there can be a correlation.

      Reply

      CrashTestDummy77

      3 weeks ago

      If the Maxfli balls are good enough for Ben Griffin and Lexy Thompson to put in play on PGA and LPGA, it is good enough for me on the amateur circuits.

      Reply

      Donn Rutkoff

      3 weeks ago

      Has MGS done a similar deep test on any Volvik? Anybody out there use Volvik crystal much? Im going to try some because visibility counts for my situation.

      Reply

      Chris

      3 weeks ago

      Based on the letter based grade of B- that should be an indicate “not recommended”. B is above average, a D is passing but would make more sense as “not recommended”. Not sure why I care since I’m going to keep buying the Maxfli’s, unless I can buy Pro Vs for $30 a dozen or they want to send me some for free.

      Reply

      Stuart Braham

      3 weeks ago

      Been playing golf 60 years Maxfli was a pro ball back in the late ’60 and 70’s made by Dunlop Tour players used them Golf id too technical today If you like the ball then play it!

      Reply

      CD Osborne

      3 weeks ago

      In the compression test, it appears 1 box was all over the place. Was there any investigation to why that first box was bad, since the next two boxes seemed fine? Is there a way for a consumer to test a ball to determine it is bad?

      Reply

      Andrew the Great!

      3 weeks ago

      You can get 4 dozen at Dick’s for $30/dozen. Pro V1x Left Dash is $58/dozen. That’s a $28 difference, not $15, or more than $2 per ball. And from my limited comparison as an 8.7 index, there’s no performance difference.

      Reply

      mg

      3 weeks ago

      playing those could be the reason you are still a 8.7

      Reply

      Hopp Man

      3 weeks ago

      Titleist fan bot account incoming.

      Wes

      2 weeks ago

      Is golf still a gentleman’s game?

      Kevin Shaw

      1 week ago

      My index is 3.5. I play them and think they are a great ball. Used to be a ProV1 guy. Not anymore.

      Cuthy

      3 weeks ago

      Where are the numbers for the same measures on the Titleist ball? I expected this to be a comparison but, maybe just a “hit” piece on the Maxfli??

      What gives?

      Reply

      MarkT

      3 weeks ago

      I don’t know why these manufacturer’s can’t just leave a good thing alone. They continue to tweak the Maxfli Tour series, and according to the 2026 Ball Test, they’ve decreased in performance from the 2024 models. Now the quality also seems to be slipping. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it…

      Reply

      vito

      3 weeks ago

      You can blame the marketing guys. They are always pushing for something “new and improved” even though it might be in the weeds or actually worse. Also, some of this might be Foremost getting sloppy and Dick’s not checking quality records often enough.

      Reply

      Paul C

      3 weeks ago

      I think the real question is can any one over a 5HC, maybe 10HC even know the difference?

      Also, what is the difference in an actual shot from a slightly off ball metric wise?

      Reply

      Aidan

      3 weeks ago

      Slight variations have been proven to cause massive differences. I think an uneven core can cause something like a 30 yard dispersion difference. Alot of people would benefit from going cheaper on clubs and spend more on the only piece of equipment you use on ever shot.

      Reply

      Fake

      3 weeks ago

      I’ve never played the Tour, but the Tour X has been a great ball, for me.

      Reply

      RPP

      3 weeks ago

      Indeed the Tour X is good. Buy by the 4-dozen at Pecker’s and save big.

      Reply

      Fake

      3 weeks ago

      I get the joke. Good one.

      mg

      3 weeks ago

      another shag bag ball

      Reply

      Hopp Man

      3 weeks ago

      Say you are a titleist fan boy without saying it.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Bounty Club Bounty Club
    News
    Sep 14, 2026
    I Played Justin Timberlake’s Ultra-Exclusive Nashville Course. It’s A Top-10 For Me.
    Instruction
    Sep 14, 2026
    “Hit It Thin To Win.” Is That Even True?
    Instruction
    Sep 14, 2026
    Should My Hands Be Behind the Ball With A Driver?