New Srixon Q-STAR Golf Balls: Premium Ionomer?
Golf Balls

New Srixon Q-STAR Golf Balls: Premium Ionomer?

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

New Srixon Q-STAR Golf Balls: Premium Ionomer?

Srixon Q-STAR Golf Balls – Key Takeaways

  • Srixon releases the sixth edition of its two-piece Q-STAR.
  • Lower compression than the previous model
  • $26.99 per dozen. Available starting today.

If all you take is a quick glance, the new, sixth edition of the Srixon Q-STAR golf ball isn’t all that different from the fifth edition. If you take a deeper dive, you’ll find your first glance is pretty much correct.

We’re talking about your basic two-piece ionomer-covered golf ball here. To its credit, Srixon packs an acceptable amount of technology into those two pieces. But realistically, the Q-STAR is what it is: a firmer, higher-spinning alternative to the decidedly softer $20 to $25 per dozen ionomer balls.

That makes it a “premium” two-piece ionomer-covered golf ball. That also makes it an oxymoron but we’ll tackle that later.

Srixon Q-STAR golf balls

Srixon Q-STAR Golf Balls

Don’t mistake the Q-STAR for its three-piece, urethane-covered cousin, the Q-STAR TOUR. That’s the urethane ball that’s been getting the two-toned DIVIDE treatment. This new edition of the Q-STAR has two key changes—Srixon calls them upgrades—from its predecessor.

First off, Srixon decided to make the Q-STAR softer, with compression dropping from 77 to 72. To get there, Srixon is using its latest FastLayer Core technology. To risk oversimplification, the FastLayer Core is kind of like a Tootsie Pop. Firmer on the outside and softer on the inside.

Srixon is part of the global tire giant Sumitomo and, like Bridgestone, leverages its corporate rubber know-how. Through variances in formula and in curing time and temperature, FastLayer Core actually acts like a core that has thousands of really thin layers. The inner softness promotes lower spin and a softer feel. The outer hardness helps with ball speed.

The other change (not sure it qualifies as an upgrade) is a new enhanced alignment line. It’s pretty much the same alignment line that’s on the 2020 Q-STAR TOUR but it’s the first time appearing on the Q-STAR. So I guess it’s notable.

Srixon Q-STAR golf balls

Spin Skin and Dimples

The new Q-STAR golf balls also feature the latest iteration of Srixon’s Spin Skin technology with SeRM which stands for Slide Ring Material. Spin Skin is a coating Srixon applies to enhance spin, particularly on partial shots around the green and from the rough. SeRM first made its appearance with the 2019 Z-STARs. It features a cross-linked molecular structure and increases friction even further while enhancing the durability of the coating.

The last Q-STAR version (released in June 2019) featured Spin Skin with SeRM. But it’s reasonable to presume the latest Spin Skin evolution from the 2021 Z-STARs has trickled down.

Srixon Q-STAR Golf Balls

The Q-STAR also features the same 338 Speed Dimple pattern as the previous version. Srixon says FastLayer works in tandem with Q-STAR’s 338 Speed Dimple Pattern for immense distance gains.

That, friends, is a direct quote from the press release.

Srixon Q-STAR Final Thoughts, Price and Availability

If you like ionomer balls, the Srixon Q-STAR will make you happy. It’s not a premium Tour-level ball and it’s not even a sub-premium urethane ball (like the Q-STAR TOUR) but it’s a decent ball. Its most direct competitor is the Bridgestone e12 Contact and others in the aforementioned “premium” ionomer category. The appeal to this category is a performance upgrade over plain-Jane two-piece ionomer balls with pricing lower than sub-premium urethane balls.

But direct-to-consumer brands Snell and Vice and kinda-sorta DTC brand MaxFli sell higher-performing urethane balls at close to the same price when bought in bulk. So it’s fair to ask if we need the “premium” ionomer category? The appeal seems to be lower compression and lower driver spin. While that doesn’t necessarily equate to more driver distance, it can mean the difference between the right rough and the right forest.

The new Srixon Q-STAR golf balls are available online and in stores starting today. They’re available on both Pure White and Tour Yellow and will retail for $26.99 per dozen.

For more information, visit Srixon.com

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John is an aging, yet avid golfer, writer, 6-point-something handicapper living back home in New England after a 22-year exile in Minnesota. He loves telling stories, writing about golf and golf travel, and enjoys classic golf equipment. “The only thing a golfer needs is more daylight.” - BenHogan

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

Shot Scope V5 Golf Watch
Apr 3, 2024 | 14 Comments
Driver Shopping Do’s and Don’ts
Mar 29, 2024 | 5 Comments
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Dan Cohen

      2 years ago

      I agree that the “premium ionomer” class is a bit silly. Either play a 2-piece ball or a urethane ball. The three-piece ionomer balls costing $35 and up is particularly absurd. I go back and forth from the TruFeel/Supersoft or Vice Pro/ProSoft/TourSpeed. But if I’m going to pay more than $25 for golf balls, it’s going to be urethane.

      The only thing that sets the Q-Star apart is that the SpinSkin coating actually is a thin coating (they say a few microns thick) that is urethane. Today’s Golfer tested the AD333 (which is the same ball…I think) and got excellent wedge spin – up there with tour balls. I’m not sure how long that spin would last, if the coating is that thin. Of course, we could find out, but that would mean My GolfSpy testing ionomer balls, which isn’t going to happen anytime soon, if ever.

      Reply

      RT

      2 years ago

      WalMart But they have raised the price !!

      Reply

      P.J.

      2 years ago

      If we’ve learned anything from the MGS Golf Ball tests is that low compression balls = less distance. I love the Q-Star Tour Divide balls, but not even slightly interested in ionomer balls. May as well play Pinnacle or TopFlite balls…

      Reply

      Golfinnut

      2 years ago

      I’d like to see some numbers before I even think of trying them

      Reply

      Mike

      2 years ago

      Thanks for the review. For me, balls with isonomer or surlyn covers really don’t cut it, they just don’t check up enough to make my short game effective.

      Giving all the ball options now, if you’re a decent golfer & want to use urethene-covered balls, price can’t be a barrier anymore. There are many DTC urethane balls in the $25 range & you can find excellent condition Pro V1 type balls online for even less than that (I sell mint pro v’s for under $20 on eBay!).

      Reply

      Joey5Picks

      2 years ago

      “immense distance gains”. Between this ball and the TM Stealth driver, we’ll all be driving it 400+.

      Reply

      Jim

      2 years ago

      I stay with my Snell MTB and Get Summ (winter ball), don’t see any reason to switch personally but it may appeal to some people.

      Reply

      Duane

      2 years ago

      Curious to know how it compares to the Srixon soft feel two piece. The compression is about the same but is about $5 cheaper. I play it alot and find it comparable to the oncore elixir and Maxfli tour, which I find are pretty equal in my performance for me.

      Reply

      JIm

      2 years ago

      Just our experiences..my wife (over 60) 18 handicap… played the Q-star and Callaway soft isomer cover balls for years….then I bought her the Q-Star tour 2 years ago and what a difference…..now she has short game control that any 18 handicap would be proud to own…40, 50, 60 yard pitch no longer runs through the green….just saying if your using the Q-Star and want a better game go to the Q-Star tour worth the extra $6 bucks. NO distance difference I have seen…..just a better short game ball…

      Reply

      Scott Johnson

      2 years ago

      Found a scrixon lady ball last fall and it seemed like I killed it with driver .just turned 71 lost a lot of distance the last 2 years .was once a good golfer. Stopped regular tees last year still trying hybrid tees. Any thoughts ? Thanks

      Reply

      MarkM

      2 years ago

      All I needed to read was “Lower compression than the previous model” and I’m out LOL

      Reply

      David George

      2 years ago

      I’ve used the Q Star Tour this year but not the Q Star. I’m overwhelmed by the many and varied claims made by all the ball manufacturers. I’ve played Vice Pro and Pro Plus, Srixon Z Star, Q Star Tour, AD333 and Soft Feel, Kirkland Signature, Snell MTB, Calloway Chrome Soft, Taylor Made TP5 etc over the last couple of years and I couldn’t tell you that any of them made a significant difference to my score.. All golf balls are in trouble in the trees!
      I might give this one a go but am seriously considering just sticking with the 333 next year.

      Reply

      AlanSF

      2 years ago

      Just tried the Saintnine U-Pro ball. A two piece ball with a Urethane cover. Every good spin and check. This is another tire company making golf balls. $24.99 per dozen. My go to ball for now!

      Reply

      Jelopster

      2 years ago

      I would love to see some testing comparing these “premium ionomers” to a basic 2 piece like a Noodle to see if there is any performance difference between the two. Most MSG readers will know that substantial performance is gained by switching to a 3/4 piece urethane ball, but I think there would be a large number of readers interested in a cheap ball comparison, even if it was on a limited scale.

      Reply

      Boyo

      2 years ago

      I’ll stick with my Snell MTB-X.

      Reply

      Aart van der Molen

      2 years ago

      Is the Q-Star in USA exactly the same as the AD333 here in Europe?
      The AD333 is claimed to be one of the best reasonably priced balls for winter golf. (see multiple recent YouTube videos from UK, but that may be marketing)
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlVtigh0dc0

      Reply

      Carlos

      2 years ago

      Yes, this is what I’ve read in the past. It’s the US version of the European AD333

      Reply

      MGoBlue100

      2 years ago

      Nice write up as usual, JB. I won’t be buying any of these, but I’ll know what to expect when I find one (while looking for my own, LOLZ).

      Reply

      Foster Atteberry

      2 years ago

      Thanks JB, now tell me, what is the difference between the Q Star and the AD333?

      I suspect they are the same.

      Reply

      RT

      2 years ago

      The AD 333 with the spinskin is awesome !!! Wouldn’t play any other but the AD333. .. I tried the Q Star but it’s price and the performance isn’t near the performance and price as the AD333 it’s a top of the list in price and performance !!!!

      Reply

      Foster Atteberry

      2 years ago

      Where can you get the AD333 in the U.S.?

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.