Amazon Just Dropped a Golf Ball, and It’s Exactly What You’d Expect
Golf Balls

Amazon Just Dropped a Golf Ball, and It’s Exactly What You’d Expect

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Amazon Just Dropped a Golf Ball, and It’s Exactly What You’d Expect

Well, well, well. Look what showed up in my Amazon recommendations between the USB-C cables and the 64-pack of AA batteries I apparently need.

Amazon has entered the golf ball business with the Amazon Basics Core Soft, and honestly, we probably should have seen this coming. There’s a Basics version of damn near everything, and since I’m reasonably confident Alexa is always listening, the simple act of many of you wondering aloud why Amazon doesn’t have its own golf balls was enough to make it happen.

What exactly is the Amazon Basics Core Soft?

According to Amazon’s product description, the Core Soft is designed for “VERSATILE USE” (their caps, not mine). You can put pretty much any vaguery you’d like in a product description, but even by that low standard, it’s fairly uninformative.

The same holds true for the USGA spin rating, where the Core Soft is listed as offering medium driver spin and high short iron spin. If you’re expecting that rating to hold true for greenside performance, prepare for disappointment. Soft doesn’t spin. Ionomer doesn’t spin. And given that one of those is definitely true and the other might be, the Amazon Core Soft isn’t a viable option for golfers looking for stopping power.

What we do know is that Amazon is billing this as a low compression ball, and the “Core Soft” name certainly more than hints at a soft core. But that’s about as specific as it gets. We’re going to order some and throw them into our compression gauge to see where the Core Soft fits on the spectrum between Supersoft and Tour Soft.

The Amazon Basics difference

Here’s the thing about Amazon Basics: it’s a brand reserved for largely commoditized items like HDMI cables, AA batteries, and phone chargers—disposable stuff where even if it’s not everything you want it to be, the barrier for entry is so wonderfully low that it barely matters if it achieves anything beyond the bare minimum performance standard.

Cheap AF is the barrier to entry for the Basics line, and I’d argue the Core Soft fits that description perfectly.

Look, I’m going to tell you there are quantifiable, meaningful performance differences between golf balls. I’m also not lost on the fact that there’s a reasonably sized segment of recreational golfers who don’t give a damn about any of that.

The Basics ball should be a welcome addition for a growing audience of non-discerning golfers looking to spend as little as possible.

The price point play

With that, I suppose the most interesting thing about the Core Soft is the price. At just over $24 for a pack of two dozen ($14.49 for one dozen), it can be had for roughly half as much as Callaway’s Supersoft—the most popular budget option in the category.

Here’s the hard truth: short of Titleist, there’s not much in the ionomer market that’s particularly good quality to begin with, so you won’t find me recommending much of anything in the category. But if you’re only going to spend $12 per dozen, you should reasonably expect that the ceiling and floor are one and the same. Point being, you’re not going to do much better at this price point, and you’re also not likely to do any worse.

The manufacturing story

The Core Soft is produced by SM Global—the same factory that produces balls for Costco, PXG, and, for what it’s worth, Malbon. None of those guys currently offer a two-piece ionomer ball, so it’s at least interesting that Amazon went this route.

Is this the entirety of Amazon’s ball story or just the beginning?

It’s possible the factory could be contract limited, but it’s just as likely the entire point of this ball is to be cheap AF, and that all but demands ionomer construction—especially if part of the objective is to undercut Kirkland in the market it created.

Is the Amazon Core Soft for you?

One of the suggested questions for Amazon’s RUFUS AI assistant is “How do these compare to Titleist?” The AI’s response? The Core Soft is “a great practice option to complement your premium Titleist golf balls.”

Even Amazon’s artificial intelligence is throwing shade at its own product. You gotta love the honesty, I guess. But hey, if you’re looking for a knockaround beater ball—the kind of thing well-suited for an afternoon round with your kids or for beginners in general—it’s hard to argue with the value proposition.

The bottom line

The Amazon Basics Core Soft probably isn’t going to change your game. It’s not going to help you break 80, and it’s certainly not going to make your playing partners think you’ve suddenly gotten serious about golf.

What it will do is give you something to hit without breaking the bank. And for a certain segment of golfers—the ones who lose three balls per round and couldn’t care less about spin separation or launch conditions—that might be exactly what they need.

Is it the best ball on the market? We can be confident it isn’t. Is it the worst? Probably not. It’s Amazon Basics, which means it’s exactly what you’d expect: functional, forgettable, and cheap enough that you won’t feel bad about donating a sleeve to the water hazard on 16.

We’ll get our hands on some Core Soft balls soon and take a closer look. Until then, if you’re looking for a golf ball that costs less than your morning coffee and has about the same shelf life, Amazon has you covered.

For You

For You

Best Super Game-improvement irons of 2026 Best Super Game-improvement irons of 2026
Buyer's Guides
Jun 5, 2026
Best Super Game-Improvement Irons of 2026
Buyer's Guide
Jun 5, 2026
I Tested 5 Complete Golf Sets From $199 To $1,599. Here’s Where to Spend Your Money
News
Jun 5, 2026
Scratch by 50: How I Started Practicing Better
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Bryan

      7 months ago

      Is this article legit??
      Can’t seem to find these anywhere on Amazon

      Reply

      Connor Lindeman

      7 months ago

      They sold out!

      Reply

      JC

      8 months ago

      Are they no longer available? can’t find them on amazon.

      Reply

      Tom

      8 months ago

      I’m a plus 2.4 index currently and have played the soft fli all season.
      The lower compression feels better to me. As long as the ball is consistent you can score with it.

      Reply

      Bruce

      8 months ago

      I’ve tried just about every golf ball on the market. Any ball, and any club in the hands of an experienced golfer, will perform the same.

      By saying: “some way, some how, that golfer always tend to break 80

      It’s never the wand, it’s the experience of the magician.

      I’m 75 yrs old, 7 index play a two piece Callaway ball, can muster up enough club head speed 200 yd drives on a good day, 7 iron 130 yds
      Play white tees 5800-6000 yards. My fairway woods, wedges and hybrids get a lot of play time.

      It’s all about the SHORT game, wedges and putter, never the golf ball. Yeah, you guessed it, all golf balls can go OB, All golf balls tend to find hazard. My word of advice for those concern about a golf ball affecting their score?

      Just be the Magician around and on the greens !!

      It’s all about NOT pulling out your wallet at the end of the round…. SAVE THEM STROKES, get it up and down baby!!

      Reply

      Chas

      8 months ago

      A good deal of the enjoyment that many of us take from golf is simply hitting a good shot, no matter where exactly it lands. My definition of a good shot is a solid shot–one where the club contacts the ball in the center of the clubface, the shot sounds and feels good, it isn’t too far off line, your swing ends up with nice balance and a controlled finish, and the shot has a nice trajectory. It is a shot to recall when you are lying in bed that night, replaying your round (I suspect you do that also). We don’t give a darn if it spins a little less than other balls making its height is 8 feet lower than is optimal or if it goes two yards more left than you think it should because its predictability is a little less. That doesn’t decrease the deep and lasting enjoyment that comes from having made a solid shot.

      Reply

      Vito

      8 months ago

      Have to disagree. I tried the new Kirkland against the Maxfli Tour X and Supersoft. My driver speed varies between 85 and 90 depending on how much pain I’m in from arthritis in my back. I hit both the urethane high compression balls 5-7 yards farther than the Supersofts. I got lucky on a local course when no one was close to me on a par 5 and hit 6 balls each. The closest the supersoft was to the others was a mishit with the Tour X and it was still 5-6 feet further than the longest Supersoft shot. MGS continues to prove that high compression balls are still better even at lower swing speed.

      Reply

      Fake

      8 months ago

      I’m not a big hitter, myself, but I found similar results to you playing the higher compression balls that I believed were bad for my game.

      Granted, the nicer things do come at a cost. If a new player is going to be losing a bunch of balls no matter what, then playing a “good enough” ball to start with is probably just fine.

      Reply

      Fake

      8 months ago

      How did the Kirkland compare to the Tour X? Distance wise, it sounds like it was similar. How about green side, wedges, etc?

      Reply

      vito

      8 months ago

      They were both pretty consistent for distance. Of the six balls, each were longer and shorter than the other but not more than a couple yards. I think I hit the Tour X higher but really can’t be sure with out a Trackman. May do that test next time I rent a bay somewhere. Around the green I couldn’t see much of a difference. My putter has a “soft” insert so the feel was about the same. Wedges were similar. I would play either and be happy.

      Bradley Heacox

      8 months ago

      Amazon did not get to be where it is by sitting on the sidelines of anything. There is a good market for them here. The Average weekend golfer is out there to have some fun and spend time with friends. Can they improve their game ? Well, over time they might, but why shank golf balls into the pond or woods doing it. Yardage might be affected by cheaper balls. 220 drive with a cheap ball vs a 245 drive with a premium ball. So what……step down a club for shot #2. I haven’t figured out my index, but my average is around a 13 / 14 per 18. Im there for a good time with friends and some exercise. I started to take the game a bit more “serious” later in life, so it’s not going to get much better. I’ll be 61 here shortly, and now will be coming off shoulder surgery. So, these balls will have a market for the non-serious players. Actually, last year I was playing a ball off Amazon called “Eagle Ace Drive”; they run about $1 a ball. Maybe a little hard, but they work for me. Not a lot of side spin, I think, but they aren’t going to back up on the green either. You watch. Amazon will make a @#$* ton of money off these by the recreational golfer. Heck, next year when I start playing again, I will buy a box and give them a whack.

      Reply

      Walt

      8 months ago

      I agree. I definitely think they’ll sell truck-loads of them. There are plenty of folks that couldn’t care less about any ball characteristic other than price. Hell, there’s plenty of guys who consider the ball retriever their best club, and couldn’t walk past a pond if you held their first-born hostage. Lol.(I say that as having been that guy when I was brand new. It was expensive to be as bad as I was.) Seriously though, more competition in the ball market is a good thing. And I honestly don’t care what someone else is playing. Golf is supposed to be enjoyable. The beautiful part about it is we all get to decide for ourselves what we enjoy most about it, and it’s different for each of us. Best of luck on healing and rehabbing to get back playing without issue.

      Reply

      WYBob

      8 months ago

      Interesting play by Amazon to dip their toe into the proverbial (golfing) pool with their own branded product. That said, play what you are comfortable with. Frankly, who cares what someone else plays. This ball isn’t for me, but I know several folks who are just starting out playing where this could be an option. With the Amazon brand behind it, they will sell. Callaway, Taylormade, and Bridgestone are about to revamp their product lines in 1Q/26, so there will be a lot of cost attractive options across the board. As the knight in “Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade “says: “choose wisely.”

      Reply

      Fake

      8 months ago

      Who knows? Maybe Amazon branded clubs will be next.

      Reply

      Chris

      8 months ago

      I think this is a good move to target the softer compression. Costco has basically had the market cornered until recently for price-per-ball with good performance. However, the 93 compression rating and higher spin does not serve anyone swinging a driver slower than 95mph very well. I think this will be a truly beginner-friendly ball at half the price of the name brands.

      Reply

      Casper

      8 months ago

      Another advantage this Amazon ball will have over other brands is the “free shipping” option available to Prime members. Often, the discounted ball savings is offset by shipping costs or the need to purchase 3-4 dozen to reach the free shipping threshold.

      Reply

      Carm

      8 months ago

      I’m the type of golfer that they are speaking to. I play maybe once a month and I’m always looking for the best price to performance when it comes to equipment. My 18 hole score is usually around 100 and I’m just out there to have a good time. I fall into the high swing speed category so these balls aren’t for me but if they come out with a “Pro V1” competitor and it’s cheaper than the Costco ball, count me in.

      Reply

      Stevo

      8 months ago

      A cheaper route for my spouse and kids to lose balls on the course 🤣🤣🤣

      Reply

      Fake

      8 months ago

      If they’re out there playing with you, then load ‘em up.

      Reply

      Mark R

      8 months ago

      Like many of my fellow MGS readers, I spend a lot of money golf. Greens fees, equipment, travel, clothing, cigars, & 19th hole all add up. Even if you’re a crap golfer, playing a round isn’t cheap. Why do players want a POS $1.50 ball that putts like a rock when DTC urethane balls aren’t that much more?
      My point is, if you’re trying to shave $1 off the price of the golf ball, maybe you should be looking at a less expensive activity.

      Reply

      Rob

      8 months ago

      It has been coming… we all knew it. First Costco, then members mark, shoot, even walmart got on board with the “athletics” brand for cheap golf balls. I have no doubt that if these are “soft” then the snake eyes brand is the “hard” version. Just wait, they will be in DSG soon enough…

      Reply

      dr. bloor

      8 months ago

      However honest AI might be, it is–predictably–wrong. No one taking practice seriously would work on stuff like greenside work with a marshmallow.

      Reply

      jjgolf

      8 months ago

      Wow… did he write that piece like it pained him to even mention Amazon. It is a good thing for golfers to have more competition in the ball market, and everywhere else. Look at what Titleist is charging (and will try to raise again) for their balls, and clearly they are running on a high margin as well.
      If you noticed, this year (and still now) almost all the ball producers are offering deals (ie. buy 2, get one free/buy 3 and get one free) and they didn’t do that nearly as much in years past. They have all raised their prices and it has opened the door for brands like Maxfli, Kirkland, Vice, and now Amazon.
      Even if you don’t play a 2 piece basic ball, you want them selling them in order to keep the other brands honest with their pricing.

      Reply

      dr. bloor

      8 months ago

      We’ll see. It earns the “keeping them honest” if it can perform on par with, say, a Callaway Supersoft. However, the absence of any detail re: performance or properties in the initial advertising hints at “lowering the floor.”

      Reply

      Paul

      8 months ago

      90% of golfers are not good enough for a ball to improve their round in a meaningful way. What improves their round is a less expensive round.

      OpMan

      8 months ago

      Errrrrrr Inflation, and Tariffs, and Titleist makes their balls in the US……

      Reply

      jjgolf

      8 months ago

      Half of their ProVs are made in Asia… And if you knew the real cost to make golf balls, you would be shocked. When you buy Titleist for $55/dozen, a big chunk of that is going into marketing which you see routinely on the Golf Channel and PGA Tour event coverage.
      Golf balls drive Acushnet’s (titleist) profit margins to solid levels, and more power to them. But as someone who appreciates the value of a competitive market, I want more players jumping into the ball market.

      OpMan

      8 months ago

      A soft range ball. Yay
      LMAO

      Reply

      Fake

      8 months ago

      Fair enough description, I’m sure. But I’m sure they will do nice sales, being so cheap. Anything that challenges the big name status quo is ok in my book.

      Who knows? Maybe they’ll get into the urethane game and surprise us single digit handicap guys who play so well.

      Reply

      OpMan

      8 months ago

      I’d like somebody to compare this ball to the Srixon Marathon range ball

      JohnB

      8 months ago

      Honestly, as a single digit golfer(around an 8), I shoot the same scores with cheap Pinnacle balls as I do with $70 pro-v1s. I live in MN, so our greens usually hold really well, so I don’t use expensive balls.

      Reply

      League Golfer

      8 months ago

      JohnB you are so correct. I am of the same opinion and observation as a 4 handicap. I play in Upstate NY and the greens are well watered and will hold any well struck shot with any ball type. Will the ionomer cover balls roll out a few feet more on full shots and a few feet even more on pitches? Probably, but plan and adjust for it. The only short coming of an ionomer golf ball is the less spin on a short sided pitch over a bunker or water hazard or the rough. How many short sided pitches or partial wedges do most golfers have in one round? So, maybe a urethane ball might save me a few feet on my comeback putt on a difficult pitch once in a while. I have seen where experts in the golf industry have begrudgingly had to admit that the lower spin of a ionomer golf ball vs a urethane ball will result in slightly straighter shots. I think almost all golfers would benefit more from slightly straighter shots with a ionomer ball more than shots that roll out less with a higher spin urethane ball. But the people and companies in the golf industry would certainly like for everyone to purchase their more expensive and higher profit margins balls instead of their less expensive balls.

      John J.

      8 months ago

      I’d say a little downward pressure on the price of golf balls is a good thing, and since Amazon is the largest retailer in the country, might just see some deals on other balls in a short time.

      I hope they sell the crap out of them and I hope they get good reviews.

      Reply

      Fake

      8 months ago

      Agreed. It’s not the ball for me, but nothing wrong with keeping it competitive. Nothing wrong with a 2 piece soft ball entering the market in the same way that Costco and Sam’s have with the urethane balls.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Best Super Game-improvement irons of 2026 Best Super Game-improvement irons of 2026
    Buyer's Guides
    Jun 5, 2026
    Best Super Game-Improvement Irons of 2026
    Buyer's Guide
    Jun 5, 2026
    I Tested 5 Complete Golf Sets From $199 To $1,599. Here’s Where to Spend Your Money
    News
    Jun 5, 2026
    Scratch by 50: How I Started Practicing Better