Axis1 Putter – Collects More Awards!
News

Axis1 Putter – Collects More Awards!

Axis1 Putter – Collects More Awards!


Axis1 Putter Continues Getting Awards – {Test Drive 1 For 30 Days}

One of the things I enjoy the most about this job is being able to shine the light on products we feel deserve more recognition in the industry.  We get the chance to test out about every club and golf gadget you could imagine. Some make the grade…but more often then not they fail to impress.  Although every once in a while…which is far and few between one far exceeds our initial expectations.

And that brings us to a putter that we feel is one of the most ground breaking of all the putters we have tested to date here at MGS.   We first introduced the Axis1 Putter to MyGolfSpy readers back in December of 2008. This is when the MyGolfSpy crew predicted that the Axis 1 Putter would win the “Most Innovative Putter for 2009!” And guess what…Sports Illustrated agreed with us…because both of us voted them as the winner at the 2009 PGA Show.  But the putter didn’t stop there…it has done nothing but collect accolades and awards since.  Here is a list of just a few of the awards the Axis1 Putter has collected since that time:

Awards:

Most Innovative Putter 2009 – MyGolfSpy.com
Best in Show – Sports Illustrated Golf Edition
Best New Golf Product – Golf.com
Most Innovative Club – PGA Show
Bronze Medal Winner – IDEA® Most Innovative Products of 2010

axis 1 putters

The Industry Calls It “The Pyramid Of Influence”

But unfortunately awards and accolades don’t always lead to overwhelming success and popularity in the golf industry.  Too often what leads to a products success is how much money they have behind them to market the product and how many players on tour are playing the product when the TV’s are on for the weekend.  What the industry calls the “Pyramid of Influence” is a very powerful thing.  A products validation starts with what the Pros are playing….and flows a little something like this:

  • PGA Tour Players
  • Other Tours
  • Collegiate Players
  • PGA Professionals
  • Retailer
  • Customer

MyGolfSpy Wants To Help Level The Playing Field

Often times a product that had little to no innovation or effectiveness in improving someones game gets a huge “buzz” about it and catches on like wildfire at the retail level.  And the way this happens is by following the bullet point list you see above.  It truly is like David (vs) Goliath if you are just trying to make a name for yourself anymore in the golf world.  Which is unfortunate but that is the way it is.  And that is why at MGS we want to start focusing more and more on products like the Axis 1 Putter.  And do our job at leveling the playing field as much as we can for equipment like this.

Not to say that the big golf companies are not passionate about their equipment and don’t give it 110% to make the best product possible…but I love the underdog…always have.  And after getting to meet guys like Luis Pedraza (Developer/Designer of Axis1 Putter) and others like him you quickly learn why.  The passion these smaller companies have for their products are contagious…the excitement and enthusiasm they exude when they get the chance to show off their product is incredible.  And one of the reasons I originally wanted to start MyGolfSpy.  There are so many great products that just never get their time to shine that I felt it was my duty to offer golfers the chance to not only see these products but to also let them experience them through our eyes and ears.

“It’s Keeps Finding Its Way In My Bag…It Just Works.”

The Axis 1 Putter is a product that I have not only tested but one that has been in my bag as well.  Yes it has an odd shape and one many golfers are not accustomed to but remember so did the Ping Anser putter when it was first launched…although it was so revolutionary and effective that it soon became the most successful putter design of all-time.  Putting accounts for about 40% of all your strokes during a round…so when pro golfers started dropping strokes by using the Ping Anser on tour they seemed to get over the looks thing pretty quickly.

The Axis1 Putter is one of a short list of putters that I think every MyGolfSpy reader should at least try out for themselves.  And believe it or not they have a 30-Day Money Back Guarantee…so nothing to lose…go give one a shot and see what you think.

Interview With Axis1 Putter Designer – {INSIDER INTERVIEW}

Want to get the inside scoop about Axis1Golf and the Axis1 Putter? We had some of the MyGolfSpy readers send in their questions for the Axis1 Founder and the man behind the idea and design Luis Pedraza sat down and answered their questions.  ENJOY!

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

Luis Pedraza, Developer/Designer of the Axis 1 Putters answers questions from MyGolfSpy.

Q. Where did this idea for the Axis1 Putter come from?

I am a product designer by training and have always looked for ways to improve products for my clients. As I was playing golf one day and addressed the ball to putt, I relaxed my grip just a little bit and noticed that the club always flopped open. I asked a simple question: Why doesn’t a club hold its line when you address the ball? This insight lead to exploring ways to accomplish this feat and the Axis1 is the result of this effort.

Q. This is a very interesting concept. However, IMHO one of the key issues facing most “average” golfers is alignment. Numerous studies by noted putting teachers indicate that most amateurs (and many pros) are frequently misaligned. What is/are the advantage(s) of the Axis1 versus a more alignment-friendly design such as the SeeMore or similar designs?

Market research data, provided by Golf Datatech suggests that the more important attribute in a putter purchase is feel:

  • Feel        80%  total mentions
  • Alignment     50%  total mentions
  • Accuracy        30%  total mentions
  • Consistency    31%  total mentions

For over 20 years the golf industry  has focused on alignment features  as the main driver for putter designs. However, as alignment features have become more prevalent, the worse the balance of most of these putters has become.  Although deep alignment features may improve the initial set up by the golfer, the benefits are often lost once the golfer begins to swing the club and the face naturally tries to open up, due to being out of balance.  Our goal is to develop putters that start with feel and balance as the primary attributes and then expand our line to include alignment friendly designs that still offer our perfect balance technology.

Q. You have quite the following in the Japanese Market, what has been your secret for your success overseas?

The Japanese tend to be early adopters of new technology and they respond positively to the physics behind our approach to balance.  We were approached by a distributor in Japan that believes in our technology and they have done a wonderful job introducing the Axis1 to the Japanese market.

Q. When the Ping Anser was first released many thought it was a very odd looking putter but has now become the most accepted, widely used, and copied design of all time.  Once people found that it performed better then their old putters many made the switch.  Do you think that this might be the case for the Axis1 Putter?

We certainly hope so.  I was once told by an industry thought leader that in his opinion, there have only been four major innovations in club design. One was when Ping introduced perimeter weighted putters. Two, when Cobra introduced oversize irons. Three, when titanium heads were introduced by Callaway, and four, when tight lie woods were introduced by Adams.   Now, I’m sure there have been other major innovations and I can’t confirm the accuracy of who was the first to introduce oversize irons. However, his point was, he believes Axis1 can be one of those major innovations that change people’s perceptions of how a putter should perform. After all, why would you want to start putting with a putter that is trying to twist in your hands, when you can start with a putter that is perfectly balanced?

Q. Given that looks may be the most important determinant of a putter’s success (both in terms of sales and actual performance), and that a lot of golfers prefer “traditional” looking designs, how does Axis1 intend to overcome any possible aesthetics obstacles in making the Eagle more commonly accepted?

True innovation often comes with a departure in aesthetics. When the Odyssey two ball putter was introduced, mallet version putters were viewed as non traditional and now they have become the norm. History has shown that golfers will adapt to new technologies when they offer a real benefit.

Q. Since “most golfers want to play what the pros play,” how will Axis1 penetrate the pro tour market, especially considering how a lot of the top name golfers are already under contract with some of the bigger OEMs?

This is a classic David and Goliath story. It is always difficult for a small company to compete with the titans of the industry. However, we are making inroads into the pro tours and now have reps on both the PGA and  Nationwide tours. We are confident that our perfect balance putters are superior to current putters and serious golfers are always looking to shave a stroke (or two) off their game.  This is especially true on the Nationwide where they are not under contract and late in the season, when making the money list is so important. Two or three stokes per tournament can make a big difference in the size of their checks.

Q. Or if Axis1 is looking for a smaller niche market, how else besides the physical design attributes will Axis1 differentiate itself from other putter manufacturers?

We believe the technology behind Axis1 is so superior that coupled with our plans for product line extension we expect to have little difficulty differentiating ourselves from other putter manufacturers.

Q. Do you have any plans on any new designs that also incorporate this same technology?  And if so what can you tell us about it?

Yes, our technology can be applied to any shape and style putter be it blade or mallet putters. We are currently working on a line extension and a mallet version for next year.

For You

For You

Golf Apparel
Oct 4, 2024
adidas Drops Into Streetwear With Rolling Links Collection
Putters
Oct 4, 2024
L.A.B. Golf: The Science of the Forum Review
News
Oct 4, 2024
Fairways & Getaways: Part I – Bandon Solstice
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Our mission is #ConsumerFirst. We are here to help educate and empower golfers. We want you to get the most out of your money, time and performance. That means providing you with equipment reviews you can trust, as well as honest reporting on the latest issues affecting the game today. #PowerToThePlayer

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Driver Ping G30 Hybrids PXG 0317
3/4 IRON PXG 0311XF 5-GW Srixon Z 565
SW PXG 0317 LW PXG 0311
Putter EVNROLL  
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Jeff from Wisconsin

      13 years ago

      Here’s a technical question I can’t resolve: If the putter is perfectly balanced which I’m sure it is doesn’t this mean I’ll miss the hole 50 times to the left, 50 times to the right, and perhaps 50 dead center. Can’t perfect balance easily go in either direction? If another club has a decided direction preference, say right or left wouldn’t that ultimately be easier to predict? I’m not being critical, I’d really love one but I’m shy of being really disappointed.

      Reply

      bob

      14 years ago

      I finally got an Axis 1. I have been wanting one since I first heard of the product. Like many of you I was totally turned off by the $300 price tag. I kept watching ebay and just got a used one for $175.

      It is truely an awesome putter. It put a beautiful roll on the ball, gives very true feedback about your stroke and I am making more putts than ever. I have tried every putte out there and I feel like this one will be in my bag for a long time.

      Luis, lower the price…… you won’t be able to keep them in stock.

      Reply

      Doc

      14 years ago

      Phil….I asked earlier, What is the head weight?
      …will you be coming out with any variation regarding weight? I have several Cameron’s, but the only one I use is one that was originally a belly length, and I reshafted it to 35″, giving me a head weight of 370,( perfect for me).

      Reply

      Phil Long

      14 years ago

      Hello Doc,

      The head weight of the current model is 340.

      We are kicking around some different things weight wise for our line extension to be launched at the PGA Show but nothing definite right now. Stay tuned…

      Thanks for your time.

      Phil

      Reply

      Phil Long

      14 years ago

      Hello everyone,

      Thanks for your feedback.

      I wanted to make my self available here for any questions.

      Look forward to hearing from everyone.

      Thanks,
      Phil Long
      VP Sales & Marketing -Axis1 Golf

      Reply

      Gary Targett

      9 years ago

      Do they make a left hand Axis 1 putter, I really want one.

      Reply

      Grant Westthorp

      14 years ago

      Having been in the golf industry for 40 years I can believe in the influence that the big companies wield. Over the past 5 years I (based downunder) have been in partnership with a US putter designer and have tried to get our putter recognized in the market place. It is very difficult unless you have a fist full of dollars to throw at advertising. Good luck to the guys at Axis1.

      Reply

      Justin

      14 years ago

      Grant, that’s why they call it “brandwashing”- from heads to shafts to grips… they brandwash the whole market.

      Reply

      GI

      14 years ago

      what is the loft and lie of the standard model?
      are these adjustable?

      Reply

      Phil Long

      14 years ago

      GI,

      The product is not adjustable. The way the sole sits on the ground the product fits virtually anyone.

      Reply

      Doc

      14 years ago

      The first thing that comes to my mind when evaluating any new product…particularly if its golf related, is the items purpose. If I’m looking for a golf item, it first off must capture my attention. Now, because of the advent so many dynamic changes in drivers over the years, I am always aware or the constant bombardment of “new, longer, sleeker, more accurate,etc” in all manufatures ads. They have used up all the superlative adjectives to the point that before long clubs will be coming out with names like”Son of r7 or r9, and Son of Bomber, or Big Berthathe the 3rd, or the 4th.”.
      But with putters, well, there hasn’t been quite the degree of descriptive adjectives, so I’m perhaps still a little more “ripe” to be plucked again….Its always sort of neat to be in the forefront of any new design….when it turns out to be a successful item. Unfortunately, the few times I’ve tried to be in that group….well, I bought one of the first Edsels!

      Reply

      Grant Westthorp

      14 years ago

      Your “Pyramid of Influence” preface was on the money. Having been involved with trying to get a putter into the golf market I can understand the frustrations that small golf companies have to overcome. Our Quantum Putter has many positive features and has been independently tested and proven to work, all we lacked was $1m to throw at advertising.

      Reply

      Grant Westthorp

      14 years ago

      Your take of the pyramid of influence is on the money, we at Quantum Putters have been trying to get our small voice heard and it is near impossible. We have had our putter tested, tried and advertised in a golf magazine. It comes down to throwing $1m at advertising. I wish you luck with leveling the playing field.

      Reply

      Justin

      14 years ago

      I just had another thought… if price is so important, why did Adams get good reviews for their $80 putter? Is it because they’ve gotten to the “Oh, it’s Adams, so it HAS to be good” point (and if that’s true, why did their wedges fail)? Why is Jerry Kelly gaming a $70 putter that he picked up at a pro shop?

      Reply

      Phana24JG

      14 years ago

      One thing that might help Axis is to get an MGS-type group together at a SAM location and see if the group finds any benefit as a whole. Since it is simpler to analyze putting, you could use a larger group and perhaps get a more statistically meaningful result.

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      14 years ago

      I think that is a great idea Phana ;)

      Reply

      Neal

      14 years ago

      I’d call it UGLY… but Ping already has a lock on that name…

      Reply

      Justin

      14 years ago

      Speaking of Cleveland, they were a clone company when they first came out. Somewhere along the lines, they shifted their paradigm (and price point) to the point they were perceived as a “big time” OEM.

      Scratch is going through something similar. They weren’t a clone company, but they slogged through for a bit until people on the forums and Ryan Moore brought them to the forefront. Looks like Eidolon and Fourteen are doing the same things.

      Does it make them worth it? I don’t know for sure, but my instinct says no. I own an original Nike SQ, the SuMo 5000, a Callaway FT-5 and an Acer XK; I don’t perceive ANY playability differences. I can hit each 260+ yards. Not bad- the way people talk, the $60 driver should suck, while the other three should outshine it… but it doesn’t.

      People always perceive a higher price as meaning better. But is a Wal-Mart brand Q-Tip worse than a “real” Q-Tip? Does a $100 coffee maker brew better coffee than a $30 one? I don’t think so.

      Reply

      NP

      14 years ago

      yes, real brand Qtips are WAY BETTER quality than Walmart brand qtips. but does it perform any better… probably not.

      Reply

      Doc

      14 years ago

      All the above really does is amplify the reality of life….we all are beginning to perceive that perhaps this is truely an innovation, one that may be the “golden grail” we’ve been wanting.
      Unfortunatrely, we also now realize that it still comes down to “I want that new Caddy, but I can only afford to drive my old Ford”.
      I am one of those who will probably save up and bite the bullet at some point down the road….after it is determined if they will produce one with the heavier head that I’ve always preferred. At this point in time I can’t seem to find out just what the head weight is….

      Reply

      Jake

      14 years ago

      So very true. If you give the perception that you are in fact a premium product, then people are willing to pay it. Why do you think Cleveland can ask so much for a wedge? They are the premium in OEM wedges.

      Also, if a small company wants to attempt to undermine the big names and penetrate the market with a much lower price, they will more than likely lose almost all credability and won’t be able to recover from the consumer’s percieved bargain view. If you believe you are the best, then make yourself look like the best, and the best is the most expensive 99.99% of the time.

      Would I pay $300 for a putter? Nope. I’m perfectly content with my Ray Cook M1-X! lol!

      Reply

      Justin

      14 years ago

      “golfers pay $400 for drivers everyday that have little to no new innovation in them”

      “perception is a big thing in sales and it is not always the best idea to brand yourself as the cheapest or side by side with every other company”

      I KNEW it!!!

      Reply

      Tyk

      14 years ago

      I was all set, the combination of a MGS endorsement, a compelling technical sales pitch, and some “we’re just the little guys trying to break through” had me ready to go. Then I clicked the “buy it now” and and honestly laughed out loud a bit at the $300 price tag. Sorry David, but there’s not very many Goliaths out there charging $300 for a putter. For all thier star power and marketing muscle, the Nike Method is “only” $250, and I can go to any decent golf store and roll it around a putting green!

      I’m not arguing that this might be the greatest thing in golf, but when you’re a small company looking to break into the market you can’t price your product up in the rarefied air and sit around and wonder why they aren’t flying off the shelves. At least with a Scotty Cameron putter there’s a strong resale market backing up a purchase. And I don’t say that to justify Scotty Cameron’s products, I don’t own any of those either.

      Reply

      mygolfspy

      14 years ago

      Tyk,

      I understand your point but you also have to consider the following:

      1. I don’t think many consumers understand the cost of what it took to make a product like this or something similar. Many consumers just say well it only costs $45 to make the part so why would I pay $250 or $450. I have actually gone over many of the costs in the forum that relate to a similar type product and I think it would surprise you the total cost after all the R&D, patents, marketing, sales staff, website, packaging, etc. etc. etc. is done. I do agree that for a cast putter the price is high, but golfers pay $400 for drivers everyday that have little to no new innovation in them and that they only hit about 10-14 times a round.

      2. Ping had many innovative products and they never lowered their prices because they knew what they had was better then their competition for one but they also did not want to brand themselves as a company in the middle or bottom of the pack brand wise. Perception is a big thing in sales and it is not always the best idea to brand yourself as the cheapest or side by side with every other company.

      3. So just because you are a small company absolutely does not mean you should be cheaper then your competition…often times it is the exact opposite…you need to separate yourself somehow in this business and going cheaper is often the nail in the coffin right out of the gates for many…not just because of the perception but also because you have to be profitable to stay in this business.

      Reply

      Tyk

      14 years ago

      I get it. Really, I do. But, you know what? The reality is, I was ready to buy. The had it. They had: a new, innovative design, a compelling sales pitch, and an endorsement from a source I trust. Three very important things they had right there, in the bag.

      And I click “buy it now” and I didn’t just cringe, I laughed. And look, I’m not the guy that casually spends $300 on a driver, or a putter, or anything,so maybe I’m not “thier guy”. But I’m a golfer. Not just a casual golfer. I log a bunch of rounds a year. I carry a handicap, I play competitive rounds, I’m a memmber at a club. What is my breaking point? I don’t know. I think I would have paid $150. I just paid $150 for an STX sight unseen, and I’m not thrilled with it, but its not thier fault, its a good product and I havent’ given up on it or them as a company. Why? Because I trust them and I’ve played thier products. Axis doesn’t have that relationship with me. I hope they have it with enough others to hopefully allow them to make a go of it so I can someday see thier putter in a golf shop and try it and if I’m convinced, I’ll buy. But if you want me to sight unseen shuck out $300 based on even 3 compelling factors, well, sorry, you lost me. And yes, there’s lots of golfers that pay more than I would for a golf club. I love those guys, because they drive the innovation that eventually trickles down to me, the discretionary buyer that doesn’t buy into the hype and doesn’t buy the brand, but is willing to pay for performance. Axis didn’t make the sale, despite a compelling pitch. I’m the consumer, it’s my buck, so sorry.

      Bob

      14 years ago

      I totally agree. Many of us putter junkies would have jumped at this putter for $150, but $300….. I don’t care about a try and buy..$300 is too much for a cast putter with no resale value. If you want market acceptance set the price so the market will try it. If you want a big price get a big name to play it. I don’t care what there R&D costs are you are going to make them up if you set the price so high no one buys it.

      Just bought the “backstryke” for $200 great putter, I believe they are piggy backing on the axis 1. I would have bought an axis 1 a year ago if it was priced right.

      Reply

      Justin

      14 years ago

      Not for $300… I haven’t found a putter worth more than $100 (my Odyssey White Hot #7, and only then because it was a gift from my wife).

      Reply

      John Duval

      14 years ago

      You know me, I’m a sucker for innovation, and being a putter whore, I would love to try this one out. I’ll have to reach out and get a review unit!

      Reply

      PinHigh Golf

      14 years ago

      Loved the Pyramid of Influence part, learn something new everyday on here. Going to go try one of these out. If you say it works I know it does, you have not failed me yet.

      Reply

      GolfAddictt

      14 years ago

      Bought this putter because of your first article and it is still in the bag. Great article Spy.

      Reply

      Phana24JG

      14 years ago

      Great interview and your “Pyramid of Influence” preface was outstanding. As I read his answer to my question I was about to skewer him until the second paragraph with his balance argument. I could care less what the sheep use as criteria to buy a putter, I want one that improves my game. IMHO, he makes a powerful case for trying an Axis-1.

      Unfortunately, as a ‘Noreasterner looking at the end of the season in about six weeks with a preference for mallets, and currently very happy with my SeeMore mallet performance, I will wait until next year to evaluate either the mallet or the line extension putter. However, it is definitely in the FY2011 Golf Budget.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Apparel
    Oct 4, 2024
    adidas Drops Into Streetwear With Rolling Links Collection
    Putters
    Oct 4, 2024
    L.A.B. Golf: The Science of the Forum Review
    News
    Oct 4, 2024
    Fairways & Getaways: Part I – Bandon Solstice