Golf Course Operators Think They Know What Golfers Want. Do They?
News

Golf Course Operators Think They Know What Golfers Want. Do They?

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Golf Course Operators Think They Know What Golfers Want. Do They?

I grew up as a public golf course kid and getting to play somewhere new always felt like a special day. Frankly, it still does.

I’ve always felt that course design and conditions were the two things I remembered most after playing somewhere new, whether the experience was good or bad.

But after reading the 2026 Golf Business Pulse Report from the National Golf Course Owners Association (NGCOA), I started wondering whether there’s more to what makes us enjoy a course and want to come back.

The report looks at what course owners and operators believe matters most to golfers. Some of their answers lined up with what I’ve always valued. Others made me wonder whether golf courses and the golfers paying to play them are really on the same page.

What do golf course operators think matters most?

The NGCOA surveyed more than 200 golf facility owners and operators for its 2026 report. One section asked them to evaluate the importance of different elements of the golfer experience.

Here are the six factors highlighted in the report and the percentage of operators who rated each one as very important.

FactorVery important
Course conditioning95%
Physical beauty and aesthetics88%
Pace of play81%
Welcoming attitude toward women81%
Cost/value79%
Welcoming culture and programming73%

Source: 2026 NGCOA Golf Business Pulse Report

These aren’t rankings from golfers themselves. They’re the opinions of the people operating the courses we play.

Course conditioning (95%)

This one doesn’t surprise me. I’ve played courses with layouts I loved but conditions that made it difficult to appreciate the design.

Course conditioning doesn’t have to mean perfection, either. I’ve played affordable public courses that were far from pristine but maintained the areas that mattered most.

I recently spoke with Jay Karen, CEO of the NGCOA, about the report. He made an interesting point: sometimes golfers aren’t necessarily looking for something exceptional. They’re looking for the absence of something bad.

Karen compared it to the hotel industry. You can have great amenities, excellent service and wonderful food but one unpleasant detail in the room (like a hair in the bathtub) can change how you remember the entire stay.

The same applies to golf. As Karen put it, “Did you see those greens? They were horrible. Horrible. Nothing else matters.”

Physical beauty and aesthetics (88%)

This was one of the more interesting findings. In 2023, 77 percent of operators rated physical beauty and aesthetics as very important. That’s climbed to 88 percent.

I think there’s more to this than golfers wanting neatly manicured fairways.

Golf has always been an opportunity to get outside but I wonder if that has become even more valuable as people look for ways to escape the chaos of everyday life.

A course with coastal views, mountain scenery or even a few memorable holes surrounded by natural beauty offers something beyond golf itself.

Pace of play (81%)

I was recently talking with a friend with whom I played college golf. We both grew up in New York and the conversation turned to playing six-hour rounds at Bethpage State Park when we were kids.

Bethpage was fairly priced and, with multiple courses, there were opportunities to get out. But you had to be prepared for a serious time commitment.

I’m not suggesting every round at Bethpage took six hours but we certainly experienced some that did.

I loathe slow golf and I think some of that comes from those early experiences. Over the years, I’ve become a fast player, almost to a fault.

I’m not expecting every round to take three hours but if I know a course regularly takes five or six hours, I’ll have a hard time going back. There’s simply no reason for it.

A welcoming attitude toward women (81%)

This is probably a topic for an entirely separate article.

I’ve spent more than 30 years playing golf and working in the industry.

The intimidation factor for women who are new to golf can be incredibly high. Before even reaching the first tee, they’re already worrying about whether they’re good enough, whether they’ll hold someone up or whether they even belong there.

I’ve seen courses do a great job of making women feel comfortable. I’ve also seen how much work there is left to do.

Karen made an interesting point about representation. Walk into many golf clubhouses and you’ll see photos of Jack Nicklaus, Arnold Palmer and Tiger Woods. But how often do you see Peggy Kirk Bell or Kathy Whitworth?

It’s a small detail but it sends a message about who belongs.

Creating a welcoming environment isn’t necessarily about treating everyone exactly the same. Different golfers need different things to feel comfortable and sometimes it’s about removing the little things that make someone question whether they should be there.

Cost and value (79%)

This one surprised me a little, especially because it ranked behind physical beauty and aesthetics.

The same NGCOA report found that 78 percent of operators are concerned golf is becoming too expensive. It also found that 90 percent of facilities raised rates last year.

To me, value isn’t necessarily about finding the cheapest round. I’ve played inexpensive courses that weren’t worth the money and more expensive ones that I’d happily pay to play again.

But when green fees increase, so do expectations. If I’m paying more, I want to feel like the experience justifies the price.

I wonder whether golfers would place cost and value higher than fifth on this list.

Welcoming culture and programming (73%)

This one ties into something Karen emphasized during our conversation: golfers want to feel comfortable at the places they play.

It’s not always about having the friendliest staff or the most elaborate events calendar. Sometimes, it’s as simple as having someone acknowledge you when you arrive, answer a question or make you feel like you’re supposed to be there.

I also think there’s a difference between visiting a course once and becoming a regular. A welcoming environment may not be the first thing you notice on a new course but it can certainly influence whether you decide this is a place where you could become a regular.

Are course operators and golfers on the same page?

I agree with much of what operators identified as important. Course conditioning, pace of play and value would all be high on my list.

But I also think course design deserves more attention. It’s one of the biggest things I remember after playing somewhere new, yet it isn’t a separate factor in these rankings.

The other thing that stood out to me is that many of these priorities are connected. A beautiful golf course with poor conditions isn’t especially appealing. Neither is a fairly priced course that takes six hours to play.

A course doesn’t have to be perfect to become one of your favorites. But it needs to get enough of these things right.

Now I’m curious whether golfers would rank these six factors the same way the operators did.

What matters most to you when choosing a golf course, and what’s the one thing that would keep you from coming back?

For You

For You

News
Nov 10, 2026
I Test Golf Shoes For A Living. Here’s What I Learned In 2026 And What I’m Changing In 2027
Motocaddy sold to private equity firm. Motocaddy sold to private equity firm.
News
Nov 10, 2026
Private Equity Buys Motocaddy: The Case For Cautious Optimism
Instruction
Nov 10, 2026
3 Mistakes Senior Golfers Make When They Start Losing Distance (And How To Fix Them)
Preferred Source
Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Britt Olizarowicz is a scratch golfer, former teaching professional and one of MyGolfSpy’s leading voices on equipment testing and golf performance. She has spent more than 15 years working at private clubs in New York and Florida and now specializes in translating test data and swing mechanics into practical advice for everyday golfers. Britt began playing at age 7 and has never left the game. When she’s not writing, you’ll find her on the course, playing pickleball, cooking, running or out on the boat with her family.

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz





      Glenn H

      3 weeks ago

      Course conditioning I agree with. I’m a member of a local course where trying to find a level place on the tee is a challenge. The game is hard enough without hitting off the tee on a down or upslope.
      The lack of ball washes is also annoying to me.
      I like travelling to other courses to see the different approaches to keeping the round interesting
      Cost to me is a relative thing. We have a course that use to be really nice. Unfortunately the person that now owns it is running it down because the land is valuable but still wants to charge the same for a round.

      Reply

      Sean

      3 weeks ago

      American tourists from what I’ve seen in Europe don’t give the slightest shit about “value”. In fact it’s a well reported fact that Yanks abroad won’t even look at a course that is less than the equivalent of $100, and as such a lot of really average courses have upped their prices to absurd levels for what they are, and the suckers that they are will pay because they associate cost with quality and aren’t caring for “value for money” in the slightest.
      You’re being ripped off and you brought it on yourself.

      Reply

      Mike

      3 weeks ago

      I’m sure that’s true. Many people who go to Europe to play golf are not on a budget & don’t care if it’s expensive since they’re only doing it once.

      I personally have no interest in traveling there & playing over-priced golf so luckily this is something I won’t ever have to deal with.

      Reply

      Sean

      3 weeks ago

      Then you’re missing out on some of the best golf courses in the world.
      Travel broadens the mind.

      Fake

      3 weeks ago

      Do you have a source for this well reported fact? I’ve seen several Americans who will look at cost when making decisions, and can spot a swindle. But this is merely anecdotal, and I’m always more interested in data. Cheers, mate.

      Reply

      Don

      3 weeks ago

      #1-5 PACE OF PLAY
      #6 Cost/Value. I refuse to play one of the nicest courses in our area because it is the place we refer to as “The place the 5 Hour round goes to die”. We also refused to play another course in summer which charging $65 , more expensive than others, and the conditions were not as good. Now that the rate is $30 for seniors on weekends we will play it. Our group are not golf snobs. We will play a course that is not in as good a condition as others as long as its PRICED ACCORDINGLY. Honestly I don’t care ONE LITTLE BIT, how nice your course is. If it takes our foursome more that 4.5 hours at the ABSOLUTE MAXIMUM, to play 18 holes, WE ARE OUT.

      Reply

      Heyweb

      3 weeks ago

      Conditions are first on the list. If this is off nothing else makes up for it. Free water for summer is a great deal. Options on the tee selection. Bunkers. If the course is good, but the sand is hard, or thin, it wrecks the round. Price is relative. Helpful staff when we arrive, both inside and outside make a difference. Finally pace of play.

      Reply

      Mike

      3 weeks ago

      Great points! But I don’t care about the free water in those jugs. Most courses do only a mediocre job of cleaning them & by later in the day, God knows how many germs the spouts have accumulated!

      Reply

      KJC

      3 weeks ago

      For regular weekly play:
      1. Cost/value
      2. Course conditioning
      2a. greens with solid base able to receive approach shots but not too soft (causes pitch marks golfers do not fix)
      2b. fairways and rough with no browned, dead, or soggy areas and divots filled
      2c. bunkers with sand, not mud or hard pan
      2d. tees that are level and have good grass, divots filled
      2e. water in ball washers and water stations
      3. pace of play (marshals that marshal)
      4. interesting design
      5. welcoming culture
      For special outings:
      1. course conditioning
      2. interesting design
      3. pace of play
      4. cost/value

      Reply

      Andrew the Great!

      3 weeks ago

      “What matters most to you when choosing a golf course, and what’s the one thing that would keep you from coming back?” Of the six metrics provided, in order of importance:

      1. Cost/value
      2. Pace of play (too many courses need rangers, or have ineffectual rangers)
      3. Course conditioning
      4. Physical beauty & aesthetics (I take pictures when it doesn’t slow things down, even courses I’ve played multiple times; but I won’t go back for the beauty if the place fails on any of my 1-3)
      6. Welcoming attitude/welcoming culture (I really don’t care; it’s nice when you get treated like royalty – Trump Doral and Merion come to mind – but otherwise, I’m not there to make friends with the pro shop staff)

      Failure would need to happen in any 2 of my 1-3, above, to keep me from going back. No single thing (except in the extreme, for example, the cost to play Pebble; or 6-hour rounds; or temporary greens) would keep me from going back.

      If the cost is right and the pace of play is good, I’ll accept subpar (no pun intended, since subpar in golf is good, but otherwise it’s bad… ) conditioning. Slow pace of play but good conditioning and good value, I’ll go back. Too expensive (i.e. Bahia Beach here in PR) but great conditioning and pace of play, I’ll go back (again, within reason) maybe once a year on my birthday (which is what I do with Bahia).

      Reply

      Andrew the Great!

      3 weeks ago

      “Walk into many golf clubhouses and you’ll see photos of Jack Nicklaus, Arnold Palmer and Tiger Woods. But how often do you see Peggy Kirk Bell or Kathy Whitworth?”

      I think that’s an unfair comparison. Instead of Peggy (whom I had to Google) and Kathy, IMO you should have referenced, for example, Nancy Lopez, Annika, and Lydia. Or Pat Bradley. Women whose familiarity in the women’s game is reasonably analogous to Jack, Arnie, and Tiger.

      Also, as an aside, the pro shops here in Puerto Rico are almost equally split between men’s merch and women’s merch.

      Reply

      Mark R

      3 weeks ago

      I prefer:
      – a challenging layout – a place that forces me to work the ball both ways off the tee
      – fast greens
      – good pace of play – a competent ranger on the course is nice
      Don’t care about:
      – conditions at $60 pubic course don’t need to be perfect, just decent
      – offerings in clubhouse or beer cart
      – less than great or unraked sand traps
      – if staff is friendly or not – they’re not playing in my group
      Dealbreakers:
      – “we’re running behind by 30 mins on tee times” as a regular occurrence
      – Youth on Course – it’s a great concept that grows the game, but I don’t want to play at a course that caters to kids
      – maintenance crews working on the course while players are on the hole
      – crappy or patchy greens
      – cart path only – slows everything down

      Reply

      dr. bloor

      3 weeks ago

      I think it’s possible if not probable that design isn’t considered in such surveys because respondents take their layouts as a “given,” and focus more on how to address player experience and revenue with what they have.

      I can think of a few places I avoid because the course doesn’t suit my game or is simply a lemon, but I’m more likely to avoid one if I consistently end up behind a foursome all taking triple bogeys and recording their scores on the green.

      Reply

      Mike

      3 weeks ago

      Those folks must be delusional! In what world, especially in today’s economy, does “physical beauty” become noticeably more important to golfers than cost/value & pace of play? I think pace of play is the biggest complaint among public course golfers. The mere fact that a course would have tee times less than 10 minutes apart shows they couldn’t give a crap about this as long as the course is packed & they’re generating revenue.

      Reply

      Duane

      3 weeks ago

      I would drop Physical beauty/aesthetics down to number 6. It may be because I’m in the mid-west where you are not going to get many great views, but I’m more interested in design, conditioning and pace of play. I also think welcoming to women could be lumped in with welcoming culture. For too many courses it seems like you are an intrusion when you walk in, whether you are man or woman.

      Reply

      Will

      3 weeks ago

      A great layout won’t save you if you’re charging like a premium course while your bunkers are full of golf ball sized rocks and your greens are half dead. And even if everything else is perfect, if the round’s over 4 hours I’m leaving a bad review. Pace of play and going out of your way to performatively show “a welcoming attitude toward women” aren’t even on the same planet in terms of importance.

      Reply

      Actual Golf Fan

      3 weeks ago

      Bad greens are a deal killer.

      Dog track conditions better come with a dog track green fee.

      Anything less than 10 minute tee times is a red flag.

      Unplayable rough is extremely aggravating.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Nov 10, 2026
    I Test Golf Shoes For A Living. Here’s What I Learned In 2026 And What I’m Changing In 2027
    Motocaddy sold to private equity firm. Motocaddy sold to private equity firm.
    News
    Nov 10, 2026
    Private Equity Buys Motocaddy: The Case For Cautious Optimism
    Instruction
    Nov 10, 2026
    3 Mistakes Senior Golfers Make When They Start Losing Distance (And How To Fix Them)