Polarizing Products: PING Turbulators
News

Polarizing Products: PING Turbulators

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Polarizing Products: PING Turbulators

If you’ve ever picked up a PING driver, you’ve definitely noticed them. Those raised ridges along the crown, known as “turbulators”, have been a signature design feature since the G30 driver in 2014. PING claims they improve aerodynamics, increase clubhead speed and ultimately help golfers squeeze out a little extra distance. But not everyone is convinced. Even if they are, from a pure aesthetic aspect for many golfers, they are an instant turn-off. Are turbulators a true technological advantage or just a polarizing design choice that does more for branding than for performance?

Let’s break it down and see where golfers land on this debate.

The science behind the turbulators

PING says turbulators help reduce drag, allowing the clubhead to move faster through the air. By disrupting airflow over the crown, they create a smoother passage which could lead to increased swing speed without extra effort. For a period of time, nearly every company was featuring some sort of crown ridge to fit this narrative but only PING has stuck by it through the years.

Turbulators sound great on paper but do golfers actually feel the difference? If you swapped between a PING driver and one without turbulators, would you gain clubhead speed? Or is this the kind of thing that makes sense in a wind tunnel but not necessarily on the course?

The fans

When PING introduced turbulators with the G30 driver, they committed to the concept in a way no other brand has. While other manufacturers have experimented with ridges and shapes on the crowns of their drivers , PING has included turbulators on every driver release for the past decade.

And the results speak for themselves. PING drivers consistently perform well in MyGolfSpy’s Most Wanted Testing, often ranking among the most forgiving and stable options year after year. Could that success be linked to the aerodynamic benefits of turbulators? If they didn’t help, would PING still be using them 10 years later? Or is this just a case of sticking with a recognizable design?

The less talked-about side to turbulators is how they can help with alignment. It is simple but the way they are placed helps not only with the aerodynamic story but also helps golfers frame the club properly at address for more consistent results. If you are like me, you may even like the look of turbulators. Do you like them? Or find comfort in having them to help with alignment on your drives?

Best Drivers for 2020 - PING G410 LST

The skeptics

Some golfers aren’t convinced turbulators actually impact performance. If they were a total game-changer, wouldn’t we see other OEMs continuing to follow PING’s lead? Instead, most brands focus on weight distribution, face technology and other ways to increase clubhead speed.

Once again, we must talk about the visual factor as, for many golfers, the fact turbulators are included on the driver is a non-starter. They say turbulators are distracting, ugly and just not appealing to look at in any way, regardless of performance.

Are you in this camp? Do you need a driver that has a cleaner look at address? Have you tried a PING driver with turbulators and not seen the swing speed increase?

Where do you stand?

PING clearly believes in turbulators and plenty of golfers swear by them. But are they a real performance booster or just a way to make PING drivers stand out? Would you choose a driver because of its aerodynamic design or do other factors matter more?

Now it’s time for you to weigh in. Have you noticed a difference when gaming a PING driver or do you think aerodynamics in drivers is a little overblown? Drop your thoughts in the comments and let’s get the debate going.

For You

For You

Instruction
Jun 9, 2026
If You Still Play Long Irons, Copy This Thought From Ludvig Åberg
PLM 2025_Most Wanted_Foresight GC3 PLM 2025_Most Wanted_Foresight GC3
News
Jun 9, 2026
College Golf Tournament Prep Looks Nothing Like It Did When I Played
News
Jun 9, 2026
The Best Father’s Day Golf Gifts That Won’t Break the Bank
Jamie Danbrook

Jamie Danbrook

Jamie Danbrook

Jamie is the MyGolfSpy Forum Director. A Canadian living in Switzerland can often be found posting on the forum under the username GolfSpy_APH. When not on the forum he can be found on the course, or with his wife, two kids and three dogs hiking and exploring. He prides himself in being a lefty golfer and is still in search of his elusive first hole in one.

Jamie Danbrook

Jamie Danbrook

Jamie Danbrook





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Pontius

      1 year ago

      I fell in love with Ping drivers ever since the G2, and the I25 was my favorite diver of all time. It had a matte finish and some cool looking black-on-black racing stripes (a better alignment feature than turbulators in my opinion). Once the face wore out I decided against going for another Ping because I find the turbulators distracting and unappealing in general. Matte black is my absolute favorite on any club because no chace of surprise sun glare at adress, but I’ll take gloss without turbulators over matte with turbulators any day. Still love my ping putters more than any others though.

      Reply

      Ace R. Rabbit

      1 year ago

      I know one guy who loves ’em

      Reply

      Todd

      1 year ago

      Hummm. Never swing a Ping with this technology but I would think if it worked for speed and stability then others manufacturers would copy. But none have. I do like the idea that it helps with alignment on the club face.

      Reply

      Peejer

      1 year ago

      Remember when Taylormade came out with a white driver and putters? It was an easy way to let everyone watching golf on TV know, it was a Taylormade product. The turbulators may be the same thing for Ping. They may not stand out as much as the white drivers, but for those in the know, it’s easy to see them and immediately thing of Ping. If that is it, it’s a great marketing move.

      Reply

      Zac

      1 year ago

      I am a loyal PING fan with irons and woods. I have the original G30 and then upgraded to the G425’s 2 years ago. I don’t mind the turbalors. PING is a family company still run by the family, deeply involved in the whole business. Might sound funny but I actually trust them – if they say they tested it and they it helps, I believe them, the spirit of Karsten is still there. If TaylorMade tells me again about this or that carbon thing doing something, i don’t believe them – they are just a marketing machine (yes the products are good but the non stop hype is unbearable for me). PING makes great products that are high quality and is quiet about that – I like that about them. They are subtle and humble but great at the same time when it comes to their products and their service. I don’t even notice the tubulators now. My bigger complaint with my G425 is the sound – has a weird hollowish type pop to it that I didn’t hear when I did the indoor fitting but noticed it when I got outside. Anyway I hit it far and reasonably straight so I am fine with it, maybe I will invest in a new G440 this year or the G430 MAX 10K from last year.

      Reply

      WYBob

      1 year ago

      Ping found that the turbuators are proven to delay flow separation over the driver crown by influencing the behavior of the boundary layer. The quantitative drag measurements indicated about a 25-percent reduction in drag for orientations and speeds toward the end of a typical downswing with a 100 mph impact club head speed. The result is an average increase in clubhead speed of “nearly” 1 mile per hour when compared with a similar head design without the crown features. That equates to about a 2-yard gain in distance, less if you swing at < 100 mph. Said another way, if you strike the ball perfectly you may gain 1-2 yards in additional distance. The question then is if those fugly bumps on the crown are worth a possible 1-2 yards? Each of us has to decide that for ourselves.

      Reply

      Spudhead

      1 year ago

      My G400 has a turbo?

      Reply

      Spudhead

      1 year ago

      And the G400 with the smaller head is giving me distance accuracy and control of shot making. Turbolators also aid in alignment
      What a great driver

      Reply

      Ray

      1 year ago

      It’s anew feature located next to the NOS button.

      Reply

      Nick

      1 year ago

      Engineer who focused on aerodynamics in college. Did a lot of CFD back then. Not involved in the golf industry. Biased towards liking the look.
      The turbulators absolutely will do two things to improve performance. They will increase the structure’s strength so Ping can use less carbon on the crown. They will reduce drag (if Ping is properly engineering every model for proper placement and shape). The drag improvement however is unlikely to be “felt” by any golfer though, where as the improvement to the weight distribution is likely helping with the forgiveness. The drag would be something a robot could measure *cough* mygolfspy *cough* and someone with some decent data analysis capability could suss out.
      Why can’t a golfer “feel” it? I mean so many reasons, I will need a check from mygolfspy to spend that much time on this.

      Reply

      U the H

      1 year ago

      I disagree that you won’t feel the drag. I’ve had my g30 for about 9 years now. I bought it used and knew nothing about the turbulator technology until recently. I used my bro n laws new Taylormade last week just to try it and I noticed alot of drag. I told him i felt drag and he didnt believe me. I never realized how much less drag my club has compared to others. I use Cobra irons but I might stick with Ping when I get a new one.

      Reply

      Tyler

      1 year ago

      First ping I used was my dad’s g30. Hated it with a passion, in particular the sound and feel were just awful to me, and it was blue which is one of my least favorite colors. Only thing I liked was the turbulators, thought they looked cool and a little different. Had a bad taste in my mouth for ping ever since. Always considered them to be junky because of that first club. Besides that I’ve always had Callaway drivers, first a big Bertha v series that i loved, and currently have an epic max that I’m luke warm on.
      Recently tried the g440 at my local simulator when the owner was getting his demos in, I just happened to be there and he asked me to try it out. Still had my bias about it and it was blue, but I love the way it looked at address, and part of that was still really liking those turbulators. Was not hitting my driver well at all that day for one reason or another so I wasnt expecting much. He gave me the 10.5 first which was going too high but still straight. After a couple shots he gave me the 9, which is my normal loft, 10 drives, straight down the middle, 275-285 carry distance, felt amazing to hit, and the sound was really nice. Grabbed my regular driver, hit 4 or 5 shots with it, mostly hooked them, hit 1 ok. Went back to the ping, 5 shots again straight down the middle. Told him if I could carry my next one over 300 I’d buy the club as soon as it was available. 297 straight as an arrow. Almost but not quite. So while I’m not buying it immediately, I’m getting a full bag fitting for a bday present to myself this summer, and I feel like that g440 and it’s turbulators are gonna be a big contender.

      Reply

      KJC

      1 year ago

      You neglected to mention the “Fried Egg” video “Turbulators” on youtube. Everyone should see it.

      Reply

      Barry

      1 year ago

      I now game a Ping Driver, but have never been a fan of the turbulators visually. Having played the Driver for 6 + months now, I don’t even notice them. Performance wise, who knows whether it makes a difference, can’t be any worse than TM’s carbon face garbage.

      Reply

      Hopp Man

      1 year ago

      If turbulators were so great, every golf company would copy them and have some form of them on their clubs, and nobody else really does. If turbulators were so helpful Ping would have them on all their fwy woods and hybrids as well, but they don’t. They are a Ping gimmick that they have dig their heels in on.

      Reply

      Keith

      1 year ago

      I imagine they work to offset the heavier head weight of the Pings (5+ grams usually).

      Reply

      Doubleduhric

      1 year ago

      Maltby uses “SpeedFins”… although they removed them from their most recent releases. They’re out there, but I don’t know if anyone has had them as long as Ping.

      Reply

      OpMan

      1 year ago

      They perform, people play them. End of. Innit?

      Reply

      Dr Tee

      1 year ago

      All of the Ping drivers I have owned ( G400, 425 and 430) have had the matte finish and turbulators. Love the looks. Believe that Ping, long known for cutting edge club tech must have aerodynamic data supporting their inclusion (for years now) in their driver series–probably not emulated by others because of patents ! Orientation of the turbulators helps with centering ball position and alignment as well.

      Reply

      G. Shaffer

      1 year ago

      I had a G driver and fairways and recently traded up to G430s. I do really like the turbulators look and definitely use them at address for alignment. I was actually kinda disappointed to find that they are no longer on the fairways. And I do think they may improve stabilization. It might be all the other improvements but I noticed definite contact improvement when I went to the G from a different driver.

      Reply

      Hickory4ever

      1 year ago

      The aerodynamic argument doesn’t hold water IMO. If it did, everyone would use them. I also don’t have any on my Toyota Prius or see them on plane wings.

      It is the Ping look. I personally don’t like it.

      Reply

      Blkngld

      1 year ago

      Actually they are present on many wings. They’re called vortex generators.

      Reply

      Killer Carton

      1 year ago

      To echo Blkngld, many performance and race cars have vortex generators, which do create a performance benefit, but only if properly engineered. Just applying some peel and stick vortex generators on your personal vehicle because you think they look cool is not likely to bring any performance benefit. The sizes, spacing, and placement of these vortex generators on the vehicle (or turbulators on the club) are all critical when trying to reduce drag instead of creating more. Many planes have vortex generators, they are just fairly small compared to the size of an average commercial plane wing so they go unnoticed.

      My confidence is high that PING has done the necessary R&D here so the turbulators bring an actual performance benefit to the club and are not just there to look cool. Which personally, I think they look super cool, but I can understand them being a no go for other golfers.

      If we consider the average club speed for a driver across a large population of golfers, say 85 mph – 135 mph, those are speeds at which the club head will see a fair amount of aero resistance. Now lets consider holding our hand out the car window on the highway at only 70 mph, we feel a lot of resistance. Think of your palm as the club head, your fingers the turbulators. As you adjust the angle of your hand and the spacing between your fingers you will feel more or less resistance, much like how aerodynamic the shape of a clubhead is and how optimal the turbulators are designed to reduce drag.

      Reply

      Ric W

      1 year ago

      Tons and tons of BS marketing that for no reason keeps people buying the product swearing it’s the best(only because they own it). Find something that works for you and use it. I think I’ll buy the hype around the NEW cobra DS Adapt 9 thousand ways to screw up your driver settings… geezz.

      Reply

      Sonoma Valley Tom

      1 year ago

      Currently use the Ping G425 Max driver. Turbulators actually help me visually align the face towards the target. My former driver was TM Stealth 2. The Ping is longer, straighter and more forgiving.

      Reply

      Clay Rouse

      1 year ago

      I have played Ping drivers for years simply because they work for me. We know from automobile design that aerodynamics are real and provide benefits. However, in the case of the turbulators, I suspect the difference in club head speed for the average golfer is so small as to be unnoticeable.

      Reply

      John M.

      1 year ago

      I would never buy a Ping driver with these ugly turbulators. I also prefer a gloss finish, but that’s just me.

      Reply

      Patrick Patterson

      1 year ago

      They are not for aero they are to stiffen the crown just like jail break technology you guys keep buying the ping aero stuff when the real reason is to stiffen the crown

      Reply

      Bazza

      1 year ago

      No they’re not. Why do you think they’re called “turbulators”?

      Reply

      Golf2Much

      1 year ago

      I’ve owned Ping G30, G400 SFT and G430 Max HL drivers over the last several years (due to developing a crack in the G30 and G400 SFT).
      Wow, crack two drivers you would think I have a killer swing speed. No, it’s a whopping low to mid 70’s. With that meager swing speed, any percentage improvement due to club head aerodynamics would likely be lost in the random changes in my swing speed over a round. I’m not banking on that extra clubhead speed to yield any appreciable distance.
      Personally, having turbulator features on the crown is not a distraction. In fact, I think they do provide an interesting alignment aide. With no other graphic on the crown, it does focus my attention to the sweet spot while addressing the ball. I think that result of the turbulators may be understated.

      Reply

      PapaTangoMike

      1 year ago

      I agree wholeheartedly. I have a G425 Max. Haven’t cracked it yet. My swing speed is about 5 mph faster but not enough to make a difference.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Instruction
    Jun 9, 2026
    If You Still Play Long Irons, Copy This Thought From Ludvig Åberg
    PLM 2025_Most Wanted_Foresight GC3 PLM 2025_Most Wanted_Foresight GC3
    News
    Jun 9, 2026
    College Golf Tournament Prep Looks Nothing Like It Did When I Played
    News
    Jun 9, 2026
    The Best Father’s Day Golf Gifts That Won’t Break the Bank