Top 10 Insights From Our 2024 Fitting Survey
News

Top 10 Insights From Our 2024 Fitting Survey

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Top 10 Insights From Our 2024 Fitting Survey

A month (maybe two) ago, we asked you to tell us about your most history with custom club fitting and your most recent fitting experience.

Rather than rehash every question and answer, we thought it might be better to share the most interesting findings from the survey and so here you go.

These are the 10 biggest insights from our 2024 fitting survey. And just like YouTube, if you stay ‘til the end, I’ll give you a special bonus insight.

1. Golfers think fitting is expensive

Before we talk about what happens when golfers get fitted, I wanted to start with the reasons why golfers don’t get fitted.

More than 40 percent of golfers who have never been fitted say it costs too much. Another 30 percent say they’re not good enough.

We addressed the latter in our recent episode of No Putts Given with Ian Fraser from TXG (see below).

As for the cost thing …

2. You’re NOT spending big money on fittings

Of the more than 80 percent of respondents who said they’ve been fitted at least once, 35 percent were fitted for free while in excess of another 30 percent had the cost of the fitting rolled into the purchase of the clubs. Effectively, that means more than 65 percent of golfers were fitted for free.

Another 10 percent paid less than $100 while just two percent paid more than $500.

The takeaway? While club fitting can be expensive, it doesn’t have to be.

3. Golfers don’t travel for fittings

We’ve talked before about the idea that club fitting can be an experience, not unlike playing a bucket list course. That said, very few golfers travel for fittings.

Forty-five percent of golfers who said they’ve been fitted traveled less than 10 miles for their most recent fitting. Another 33 percent traveled between 11 and 25 miles. In fact, more than 86 percent of your recent fittings were done within 50 miles from home.

Just over five percent said they’ve traveled more than 100 miles for a fitting. What we can take from that is that most golfers aren’t looking for the best possible fitting but rather the best of what’s around.

With that, it’s not a surprise that “It was close to my house” was cited 30 percent of the time as the reason the fitting location was chosen. Stocking the brands golfers are interested in was cited most often (38%). Fitter’s reputation (35%) was next.

4. Most golfers get fitted at off-course pro shops

Combing through responses for those of you who selected off-course pro shops from the options and those of you who chose to write in the name of your local shop, we’re confident that local off-course is where the majority of fittings take place.

Among the custom fitting chains, Club Champion is a dominant No. 1 with more than 14% percent of all fittings taking place at its locations.

Across big box stores, Golf Galaxy (excluding DICK’s) leads the way with five percent of reported fittings taking place in its stores. PGA TOUR Superstore isn’t far behind.

5. Fitters sometimes miss an important part of the fitting conversation

A strong majority of fitters discuss both performance objectives and your current equipment ahead of the fitting itself. It certainly makes sense to start the fitting conversation with what’s already in your bag and how you’re hoping to improve.

Still, only 25 percent of you said the fitter asked about your budget before the fitting started. I suppose there’s nothing inherently wrong with that but it does run the risk of fitting golfers into a perfect setup only to find out it’s well outside their price range.

This is something that was discussed on a recent episode of No Putts Given with Ian Fraser from TXG.

Discssing club fitting with TXG/Club Champion Canada’s Ian Fraser

With the where’s and why’s out of the way, let’s look at the fittings themselves.

6. Putters are the least fitted club in the bag*

Irons are the most fitted clubs in the bag with nearly 92 percent of you reporting being fitted for your irons at least once. That make sense since very few retail locations stock off-the-rack irons. The driver (80%) isn’t that far behind.

The least fitted clubs in the bag are, by the numbers, utility irons (less than 6.5%) and hybrids (31%), but the asterisk on those numbers is that not everyone carries a hybrid or a utility iron.

Of the clubs we can reasonably assume are in every golfer’s bag, putters (35%) are fitted slightly less often than wedges (37%).

I would suggest that, when done right, both clubs require specialized fitting. However, it’s not uncommon for a wedge fitting to piggyback on an iron fitting so there’s likely quite a bit of nuance between being fitted for wedges and really being fitted for wedges.

Nevertheless, your responses reveal the shortest clubs in the bag are the most neglected from a fitting standpoint.

7. Fitters still rely on conventional metrics

Not surprisingly, distance is the most commonly discussed metric during fittings. It was part of the conversation 78 percent of the time. Other tried-and-true metrics like ball speed, launch angle, spin rate and dispersion came up in fittings between 67 and 72 percent of the time.

Perhaps more interesting is what is seldom discussed. Despite being where the golf stats world has landed, Strokes Gained was discussed only 1.4 percent of the time while peak height (36%) and descent angle (30%) weren’t discussed nearly as often as other key metrics.

The latter is arguably one of the most undervalued metrics in the fitting world as it’s generally a great indicator of when one or more other things aren’t where they need to be.

8) The excessive pressure to buy might be overstated

One of the most common complaints we hear is that fitters sometimes pressure golfers to buy expensive and sometimes unneeded upgrades. As we touched on, the best way to avoid this is to make sure budget is part of the initial conversation before the fitting starts.

That said, on our scale of 1-10 with 1 meaning no pressure, the average pressure score was just 2. That suggests while arm-twisting for upgrades certainly happens, it’s not as common as you might think.

9) Most golfers buy the clubs they’re fitted for

Does it surprise you to learn that 85 percent of golfers said they bought the clubs they were fitted for? Personally, while surprised might be overstating it a bit, it’s higher I would have thought.

Among the golfers who didn’t buy what they were fitted for, a reasonably high number said they wanted a brand-agnostic fitting before buying. The inference there is that most of those fittings were done by manufacturer fitting reps or at OEM-owned facilities.

Thirty-three percent said what they were fitted for was too expensive (or they could get it for less somewhere else). Fewer than 13 percent said they didn’t buy because they didn’t trust the recommendation or had a bad experience.

10) Golfers think there’s room for improvement in custom fitting

While more than a few commented that they felt their fitting experience was perfect, the most cited area for improvement (33%) was having the option of hitting more than one club from a set.

Also commonly cited (30%) was a different fitting environment, with the most common comments including a preference for hitting real (not range) golf ball off grass.

Twenty-eight percent would have preferred more head and shaft combinations.

Cycling back to point No. 8, only six percent said they would have liked less pressure to buy.

BONUS – The fitting environment needs work

We just touched on how golfers believe their fitting experience could have been better but your responses to a trio of questions helped identify additional shortcomings found in many fitting environments.

Sixty percent of you reported being fitted indoors. Forty-nine percent of those fittings were done using either a Trackman or FlightScope launch monitor but nearly 60 percent were done without using Titleist RCT (radar capture technology) golf balls. Without RCT, radar-based launch monitors struggle to accurately capture spin rates which is obviously an important detail in club fitting.

Good fitters will tell you they know when the spin rates are wrong and will eliminate those shots from the consideration set. With fatigue a real factor, no swing should be wasted. The best fitters should leverage the best available technology.

For You

For You

News
Jun 19, 2026
Scratch By 50: I Switched From The Worst-Rated Driver To The Best-Rated Driver
News
Jun 19, 2026
Everything Fell Apart On The 5th hole. Here’s How to Save Your Score Anyway.
News
Jun 18, 2026
AskMyGolfSpy: The Equipment We Use To Test Your Equipment
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Gary

      2 years ago

      Had two different fittings that lead to a purchase. First was a fitting company. Lots of options for clubs and shafts, indoor and outdoor options. Fit for woods too. Biggest surprise was they are there to sell upgraded shafts. No option to buy the club with stock shaft from OEM. It’s $50 to build each club. I also paid a charge for the fitting. The other fitting was a DTC. Only their product but all shaft variations available and I could hit the 9i and wedge too. No up charge to build the clubs. All indoor, and Quad 4 with my choice of golf balls. No charge for the fitting. I definitely think fittings are valuable but you need to be aware of the fitters goals and have some idea of what you want to see in your new club: feel, distance, spin, etc.

      Reply

      Mike

      2 years ago

      Gee, bet I can guess who the first fitter was

      Reply

      A King

      2 years ago

      I am not convinced that fittings are the scientific exercise that they purport to be. Every fitter seems to come up with a different make up. As a science guy I have always found that an equation always has the same answer and they don’t. Most of the ones I speak with don’t listen well. They want me in a whippy shaft that doesn’t really work for me. I like stiff shafts and tell them so, but they are the “experts” and poo-poo my point. I don’t think indoor fittings with one or two clubs actually works. Yes, they can show you numbers on a screen, but that doesn’t seem to translate to the course very well. Of course, I am not above taking a grinder, hacksaw, or lead tape to my clubs to make them work for me. I tend to adjust them as needed. If your swing isn’t repeatable then how is a fitting supposed to help? If you play in non-ideal conditions how do the indoor fittings help? They don’t have the time to try everything, and neither do you. It just seems like an expensive crap shoot. I know a number of people who got fitted and their game either didn’t change, got worse, or developed the notion that they would never improve. And, quite often I hear people ask the player if they communicated with the fitter well enough. No one seems to blame the process.

      Reply

      Michael J

      2 years ago

      Good point. When done correctly, a good unbiased scientific fitting can make a significant difference to an individuals performance. However, the quality and inconsistency of fittings across the board is a very big problem that reflects poorly on both the launch monitor suppliers and PGA’s. A lot more training needs to be given by these parties to standardise the process and remove bias.
      With regard to the results, I would like to know if the survey asked all golfers or just “core” golfers? There is a big difference.

      Reply

      Ryan

      2 years ago

      In several of these questions the “Other” is fairly large and should probably be examined. It is hard to get insights when “Other” is such a large % of the response.

      Reply

      Kuso

      2 years ago

      #4: what OTHER place are these people talking about? Where did they go, Outer Space? LOL
      #9: again, what OTHER reason? This one should have had a specific answer, such as “Because I didn’t see a big enough improvement” is what I think they mean when they choose OTHER.
      #10: Hit more than 1 club???? Yeah then you didn’t go to a real fitting, it was too casual, because you went to a free one or a real cheap one, and you also probably only did it for 30 minutes. If people expect to be able to hit everything new being sold from top to bottom with every head and shaft option available – people need to be ready to be there for 4 hours – but do they even practice hitting balls that much when they go to the range in the first place? And even 4 hours isn’t enough – are you willing to go back the next day, or even, go eat lunch and come back in the afternoon? Are you fit enough or strong enough to hit that many balls to know that your swing is consistent enough from minute 1 to the end of hour 4 to feel like you’re still swinging the same?
      One of the questions also should have been, “Did you go in with high expectations” or “Were you prepared to just trust the fitter and accept the results?” etc.
      Even with basic knowledge, anybody can generally see based on your swing, swing speed, and handicap, or your average score, how your game is, and so what players need to do is go into fittings not expecting a gigantic improvement but any kind of improvement, whether it be incremental and small. Look at the Tour pros – some of them they switch clubs to the new ones every year – even if it’s a minute incremental improvement = still see it as an improvement.

      Reply

      Fred

      2 years ago

      So for question #10, my assumption is that “they” are talking about hitting more than just a 6 or 7 iron in the fitting.
      I am hoping that this is the case not that someone just hit one club and was like that one is good.

      Reply

      Kuso

      2 years ago

      I think they mean they hit one club of one of the new ones available

      Mike

      2 years ago

      For me it was a 7 iron for the iron fitting, but referring to the longer comment above, I did multiple fittings, splitting up irons/wedges/driver/woods/putter, swinging all head/shaft combinations that the numbers suggested. I would’ve liked to maybe swing a 4 and a 9 along with the 7, something like that.

      WYBob

      2 years ago

      Because of my location, it would have been over 120 miles to get an agnostic iron & wedge fitting (if those even exist given spiffs, etc.). To compensate I went to 6 different OEM fittings over 2.5 months. My observations are: 1) most of the OEM fitters were very qualified and offered good insights into my optimal choices without any pressure to buy, 2) Almost all of the irons & wedges were very good and reasonably comparable, 3) they used either a GCQuad or Trackman but were unfortunately limited to utilizing range balls, 4) each OEM had several shaft options to test but did not have their full array of shafts from their shaft matrix, 4) in the end I had to test shafts across all 6 OEM’s to get to an optimal shaft for my game and then extrapolate it to the other OEM iron offerings, 5) there is a disparity in shaft pricing between OEM’s which ranges from free to a $65/shaft upcharge which can significantly change the economics between comparable iron choices, 6) all the OEMs allowed me to test other clubs (i.e. driver, etc.) during the fitting. Although not the optimal way to get fit, it did prove invaluable. I was playing the wrong shaft in my previous irons that had too flat of a trajectory and I needed slightly more spin. As a result of this protracted way to get fit, I bought a new set of irons which I now feel will better fit my game. The bonus is that I also got my specs for a future driver purchase. I also realized that things change as I get older and not to assume what worked 5-6 years ago, still is best for me now!

      Reply

      JR

      2 years ago

      Point#5 indeed! The club manufacturer shaft offerings pair like auto makers with tire manufacturers.

      Reply

      Matt D

      2 years ago

      It’s nice for folks who had a good experience with fitting. For me, it was opposite. Judgemental attitude is what I received. Totally disrespectful. (Sorry, I’m not pro or a low handicap.) These fitters should be upbeat and try to make you feel positive and less nervous as possible and that didn’t happen with me. Fool me once…

      Reply

      Samuel

      2 years ago

      Every fitting I’ve done from True Spec to my local club to a private fitter has some fatal flaw. Many local fitters lack either knowledge, technology or product (shafts etc.). The big guys like True Spec, at least where I went at Pine Needles, still have you hitting off a mat with range balls. I don’t play golf off a mat nor do I play with range balls. Unfortunately, you are either paying a company like True spec out the wazoo to build your clubs or the manufacturer is building your clubs. A fitting is only as good as the build. If you are getting over length or under length clubs, frequently things like the swing weight is totally ignored by manufacturers and will not be the same as what you hit in the fitting. I have been fit many times, bought the clubs and what shows up feels totally different than what I hit in the fitting due to this. I spent a lot of time and money to find out what does not work that’s for certain. Can’t say I’ve landed on the ideal fitting scenario yet.

      Reply

      Jason S

      2 years ago

      For item 2, answer “rolled into club cost” needs to be expounded upon. Although places like Golf Galaxy only charges around $50 for a fitting and refunds that if you buy, places like Club Champion may roll that fitting cost into the club cost, but that amount will likely fit into the $400+ category which will make that number larger than it shows. So that answer, in my opinion, is a bit skewed.

      Reply

      Patrick Stowman

      2 years ago

      I drove 250 miles for a driver fitting in February. Hadn’t hit a ball for 4 months and hit mostly low hooks. Wound up with a Titleist TSR 1 and a $300 upgrade shaft. In May I found that I hit it straight and very high. About as far as my 5 wood. I asked to trade for a demo 10.5° and was told to come back to get fit again. NowI play a used Paradym 10. 5 that I hit quite well. And once in a while I play my $1000 driver and think WTF. Screwjob

      Reply

      Mike

      2 years ago

      Please tell us where that fitting took place. Please!!!

      Reply

      Mike

      2 years ago

      Trade request aside, isn’t it on you to not show up when rusty? The fitter can only “fit” to the swing you show up with. Seems like common sense.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Jun 19, 2026
    Scratch By 50: I Switched From The Worst-Rated Driver To The Best-Rated Driver
    News
    Jun 19, 2026
    Everything Fell Apart On The 5th hole. Here’s How to Save Your Score Anyway.
    News
    Jun 18, 2026
    AskMyGolfSpy: The Equipment We Use To Test Your Equipment