TaylorMade Tour Response and Soft Response Golf Balls
Golf Balls

TaylorMade Tour Response and Soft Response Golf Balls

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

TaylorMade Tour Response and Soft Response Golf Balls

The simple story behind the new TaylorMade Tour Response and Soft Response golf balls is that they’re made for you. The made for you thing comes from the fact that when TaylorMade asked golfers what features they want in a golf ball, the #1 answer was, “I want a golf ball that’s designed for me.”

Well, sure.

Allowing for the reality that nobody can design one, or even two golf balls that are ideal for everyone, the likely context here is that amateur/recreational golfers want balls designed for the realities of their games (and want to pay less for them).

A healthy portion of this particular group is made up of what the industry likes to refer to as moderate swing speed golfers. Moderate, as we’ve covered before, is code for slow-ish. Guys, they’re just being nice.

I’m not trying to mock anyone, because all this moderate stuff serves as both a reality check and an opportunity. A soft golf ball is slower than a firm golf ball, but as speed declines, the distance consequences of low compression all but disappear in the wash that is our own variability.

Tour Response Tech

TaylorMade Tour Response Construction

With Tour Response, TaylorMade’s is using what it calls a speed-increasing ultra-soft ZnO Flex Core. As we’ve touched on before, all soft materials aren’t created equal. There are faster soft materials and slower soft materials. Similar to the stories built around new versions of Titleist’s AVX and Callaway’s Chrome Soft, the TaylorMade-supplied info suggests a faster soft ball.

As was the case with those other balls, TaylorMade is surrounding its soft core with a firmer casing layer. TaylorMade calls it Speedmantle because god forbid you don’t brand every layer of the ball. It’s likely the combination of ZnO Flex Core and the Speedmantle that account for any speed gains.

Guys, I probably shouldn’t tell you this, but that firmer mantle is a necessity. A low compression core without a significantly firmer outer layer is how you make a really slow golf ball.

TaylorMade Tour Response Core

Urethane Cover

The bigger story here – and in fact, the point of differentiation for TaylorMade – is that, like Project a (and TP5), the TaylorMade Tour Response features a cast urethane cover. TaylorMade says golfers want a ball designed for me, but what we hear most often is that golfers want more greenside spin, and you’re not going to get that from the ionomer covers used in cheaper golf balls.

Let me lay this out as simply as I can. Urethane is better. Period. Hard stop.

Ionomer is cheaper and offers no performance advantage. Sorry. It is what it is.

The decision between the two is simply a matter of where you fall on the price vs. performance curve.

TaylorMade Tour Response

Affordable (by Market Standards)

Priced at $35, TaylorMade believes golfers will find value in Tour Response. When you consider that nearly every other mainstream OEM prices its urethane balls above $45, and the Ionomer-covered Titleist Tour Soft and Callaway ERC Soft are priced similarly to Tour Response, one could easily argue that TaylorMade presents the value proposition in this particular conversation.

Tour Response is offered in white and yellow. Retail availability begins on 2/28/2020.

TaylorMade Soft Response

TaylorMade Soft Response Box

For those of you for whom price considerations outweigh performance considerations, TaylorMade is offering the Soft Response golf ball. Billed as providing Effortless Compression & Dominant Distance, Soft Response boasts an ultra-low 35 compression core.

As a quick aside – you’re not going to find any real comparative value in manufacturer-provided compression numbers. Some give you ball compression, others give you core compression (typically used for bragging rights), and everyone measures with different equipment anyway. That’s not much of any real value to be learned.

It was me. I said it. I stand by it.

For Average Swing Speeds

TaylorMade designed Soft Response for average swing speed golfers who struggle to get the ball airborne. For those golfers, the benefit offered by Soft Response can be found in the dimple design. TaylorMade’s Extended Flight Dimple Pattern features shallow u-shaped dimples, which promotes lower spin and help keeps the ball airborne.

Again – consider what this might mean for your iron game.

The TaylorMade Soft Response golf ball will be available in white, yellow, and matte red. I recommend avoiding matte finishes. They look cool (especially the red), but they’re inherently less consistent when moisture is introduced, but then again, Soft Response isn’t really a performance-first ball choice anyway.

TaylorMade Soft Response Matte Red

TaylorMade Soft Response is available beginning 2/28/20. The retail price is $25.

Fitting Considerations

While faster soft balls are all the rage right now, it’s important to remember our key fitting considerations. In some cases, the lower spin properties of soft balls can make up for the speed penalty; however, they often bring with them lower spin, which can be problematic in the iron game.

For high speed, high spin players, lower spinning soft balls can work really well because the distance gained from spin reduction can more than offset the speed penalty. Those same high spin players typically don’t have issues generating enough iron spin.

For more information on Tour Response and Soft Response golf balls, visit TaylorMadeGolf.com.

For You

For You

Irons
Apr 24, 2024
PXG Irons: Model By Model
Putters
Apr 23, 2024
PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
News
Apr 23, 2024
Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Mark R

      3 years ago

      Considering on what I spend on annual club membership, indoor winter golf, new clubs, clothing, food, drinks, the cost of a golf ball is completely insignificant.

      Reply

      Richard Colvin

      4 years ago

      I just used the Tour Response for the first time today. It seems harder than the Project A, which I love. It also didn’t stay white, meaning that each dimple is now outlined in brown, the way that balls that have been sitting in the water for a long time look. It’s strange. Anyone else see this on their balls?

      Reply

      HAC

      4 years ago

      “Priced at $35, TaylorMade believes golfers will find value in Tour Response. When you consider that nearly every other mainstream OEM prices its urethane balls above $45, and the Ionomer-covered Titleist Tour Soft and Callaway ERC Soft are priced similarly to Tour Response, one could easily argue that TaylorMade presents the value proposition in this particular conversation.” Doesn’t the Srixon Q Star Tour have a urethane cover at a cheaper price – what makes this one better?

      Reply

      Teetime

      4 years ago

      Q Star has been my ball for the last year. My buddy had me try the new Tour Response. The TR’s urethane is cast whereas the Q Star is sprayed on. I believe the TR may provides more green side spin and definitely more durability..

      Reply

      Dan

      4 years ago

      The cover of the Q Star Tour is urethane, and it also has the coating applied to it. Both Z Stars also have the coating, as does the regular Q Star/Ad333. I think the Soft Feel is the only one without the coating.

      Bob

      4 years ago

      Seems like a lower quality ball for a higher price than you can pick up a box of last gen Srixon Z Star, Snell or last generation Bridgestone Tiger balls. Sucker purchase. Look online for good deals and you will find them. I just bought 3 boxes of Z Stars (gen 5) for $60 (two sleeves for $9.99 each). Can’t beat that deal.

      Reply

      MIKE

      4 years ago

      Seems they’re doing what Titleist did, replacing the NXT-Tour line w/ the Tour Soft. Also seems that every name change “ups” the price a bit. These day, you can buy SO many pro-caliber balls in the <$35 range (some much less), so why would I buy these? As for me, I find TONS of lost balls (i.e. Pro V1's) in great condition & sell them for a third of what these balls cost. You'd be surprised how many folks play (& more importantly pay for) balls that are well above their skill level.

      Reply

      Graham

      4 years ago

      Is the Tour Response a replacement for the Project A?

      Reply

      Gary Lewis

      4 years ago

      Looks like it is a replacement of the Project A based on the description.

      Reply

      Dakota

      4 years ago

      Buying golf balls through an OEM is like still paying for cable. It just doesn’t make any sense. Nothing impressive or new about this ball when you consider companies like Snell, Vice, Oncore…etc.

      Reply

      Doug

      4 years ago

      Unless you lose a massive number of balls I don’t understand why anyone would be willing to pay $3 (35) per ball but not $4.(48) for something better. And… if you did lose that many, how much would your score really change from $20 to $35 to $48?

      Not sure what to think honestly. I used to be in the camp of using whatever was in my bag but saw a big improvement in distance control when I decided to stick with one ball. It seems like I spend so much on golf between clubs, green fees, clothes, shoes, drinks :), etc, that spending an extra dollar per ball for the best just seems like an easy decision.

      What do you guys think?

      Reply

      Will B

      4 years ago

      I’m with you, I’d much rather have a top performer consistently (in my case Pro V1) and try to find cheaper versions of that, like logo overruns at your local “Worldwide Golf Shop” ($3) Or when they do the personalization sales over Christmas. My lost ball total also probably got cut in half when I switched to the Pro V1 too.

      Reply

      Peter

      3 years ago

      I’m sure there are those out there like me, where the difference between a $3 and a $4 ball is $1.

      Reply

      DegenerateGolf

      3 years ago

      Once I stopped losing a bunch of balls a round, it became more beneficial to start looking at the right balls for fit; but it’s a chicken egg situation for many. Do I wait to get better, or will a better ball make me better? In my case, it was both. I got better with fundamentals, and the better ball gave me a plus up to get more consistent.

      Personally, I found the Bridgestone Tour BX and haven’t looked back. Tour BX helped me with my left to right spin, which in turn made my driver more consistent. The green side spin helped me improve my short game. Changing balls I would guesstimate (between technology, consistency, and confidence) improved me 3-4 strokes per game. I haven’t been to a range in over a year, and play less than a round every three weeks — but I’ve been able to maintain my HCP due in large part to the consistency of the ball. If I was playing another I’d be regressing without any practice.

      Reply

      RT

      4 years ago

      Copying the Wilson duo Professional and the New Wilson duo soft+ !!!!!

      Reply

      Bob

      4 years ago

      Looks like it, doesn’t it? Wouldn’t mind head-to-head comparisons. Would love it if MGS did price bracket comparisons as well.

      Reply

      Alex

      4 years ago

      Maxfli Tour scored very high on the ball test (especially for under 90mph swing speed) and you can usually get them at DSG at 2 dozen for $50. I have found (but not others) that they are fairly easy to scuff (usually on a full SW for me). If possible, it would be a good comparison test (along with the Q star tour which didn’t do so hot in the ball test) of Battle of the Budget Moderate/slow swing urethane balls.

      Reply

      Berniez40

      4 years ago

      The Maxfli Tour scored big with me as well. Once I crunched the MGS Data that seemed to be the ball that fit my game. I find that the Matte Green are easy to see and don’t scuff up (at least not visibly)nearly as easily as the white ones do. Besides–they tend to go on sale sometimes at $19.99 a dozen, and even once saw them at 3 for $50….but those are flash sales so you have to react as if it were K-Mart Blue Light Special.

      Reply

      Oweno2

      4 years ago

      What happens to both the project a and project s balls. My wife plays the S and I play the A and we have been very happy with both the performance and price.

      Interesting note with the project S balls is that my wife can feel the difference between the white and matte balls and in wet, windy or cold conditions she switches to the white balls. As well I find I can play the white project s but not the matte balls. This seems to be consist with some of your findings

      Looking forward to your ball testing, I hope you include this tier of balls in your testing and of course “find it, cut it”

      Reply

      Tim

      4 years ago

      I hope this is not a project A all over again. That ball sucked

      Reply

      Alex

      4 years ago

      I loved the 2nd generation (it had a seam, black [a}). They raised the price of the next/last generation and I peace-ed out.

      Reply

      J

      4 years ago

      Is there a correlation between soft and less side spin? That was definitely something a lot of mid to high handicapper would like to know. What golf ball performs better when hit with an open or closed club face or off plane swing path, which type of golf ball finds more fairways..

      Reply

      Alex

      4 years ago

      I have been curious in the same topic. If the clubface is “cutting” across the ball, it seems like the cover would have more influence on side spin. Because it is a glancing blow, it seems to me that a urathene covered ball would grip the clubface better causing more side spin. However not sure how this would be influenced by compression which would also affect spin rates.. I would love to see something like this in the MGS ball test. Not sure if the robots can be adjusted for an open clubface and a slightly over the top swing…..

      Reply

      Gollie

      4 years ago

      This one actually made me chuckle. Love me some TC lol.

      Reply

      Alex

      4 years ago

      I am happy to see that MGS has had a bit of a shift in the messaging around soft golf balls. I feel like the previous messaging of “soft is slow”,has been adjusted with the caveat of “ distance gains could be recouped by high speed high spin players, especially by longer iron shots. Although there are certainly diminishing returns, as a player with low 100s driver ss, and very high spin irons, I feel like the Srixon Q star tour and Bridgestone tour B rx do not provide overall distance losses when considering the extra iron distance, AND still have adequate amounts of spin around the green (for me at least).

      Reply

      Kevin

      4 years ago

      Assuming this ball is a replacement for the Project (a) ball ? At the $35/dozen price , the Shell MTB/MTB-X is still a better & cheaper option IMO …

      Reply

      Paul

      4 years ago

      Is this not just a project a rebrand?

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Irons
    Apr 24, 2024
    PXG Irons: Model By Model
    Putters
    Apr 23, 2024
    PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
    News
    Apr 23, 2024
    Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.